Interspecific Competition in : Observations at a Feeder

Samuel S. Snow,1,2* Daniel J. Field,2,3,4 and Jacob M. Musser1,2

1 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, P.O. Box 208106, New Haven, CT 06520-8106 USA *Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Division of Vertebrate Zoology, Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, P.O. Box 208118, New Haven, CT 06520-8118 USA 3 Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, P.O. Box 208109, New Haven, CT 06520-8109 USA 4Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560 USA

ABSTRACT We describe an aggressive interaction between the extremely rare Jocotoco (Grallaria ridgelyi) and a close relative, the Chestnut-naped Antpitta (Grallaria nuchalis). Since first discov- ered in 1997, ecological information about the has begun to accrue; however, much remains to be learned about this rare in its limited native range. The observations described here advance our knowledge of the behavioral ecology of this elusive species and con- tribute more broadly to our knowledge of interspecific competition in antpittas in general. We show that in avian systems in which playback experiments fail to detect competition, competition may still be prevalent, in this case manifesting in a nonvocal, physically aggressive interaction. We also raise new questions about the potential for temporal variation in interspecific competition in grallariids due to increased resource demands during nestling provisioning.

KEYWORDS Grallariidae, Jocotoco Antpitta, interspecific competition, playback experiments, endangered species, Tapichalaca

Introduction In doing so, we contribute to the knowledge of the habits of a unique, threatened, and little-known First discovered in 1997, the rare and extremely species, while also adding to our currently limited local Jocotoco Antpitta (Grallaria ridgelyi) is understanding of antpitta behavioral ecology. among the least numerous and least studied of the Intraspecific aggression in the Jocotoco antpittas (Passeriformes: Grallariidae) (Krabbe Antpitta has been observed only once. F. Men- et al. 1999; Krabbe and Schulenberg 2003). doza, a park ranger at the Tapichalaca Biological Because of their extremely secretive nature, rela- Reserve (lat 04°30ЈS, long 79°10ЈW; elevation tively little about general antpitta ecology and approximately 2,500 m) in southeastern Ecuador, behavior has been documented, beyond what can happened to encounter two Jocotoco Antpittas be gleaned from individual sightings and the apparently fighting over territory. He first heard study of breeding biology at active nest sites the two giving “challenging contact calls” (Krabbe and Schulenberg 2003; Greeney et al. and then, when they emerged onto the trail ahead 2008; Freile et al. 2010; Greeney 2012). Here we of him, he described the interaction between the describe, for the first time, direct competitive two individuals as reminiscent of two domestic interactions between G. ridgelyi and a close rela- fighting-cocks (Gallus gallus gallus): “The strong tive, the Chestnut-naped Antpitta (G. nuchalis). bill was used for fierce blows, and the victorious

Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History 56(1):89–93, April 2015. © 2015 Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University. All rights reserved. • http://peabody.yale.edu 90 Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History 56(1) • April 2015 furiously followed its enemy, attacking its determining the range and distribution of the back and rump, until both birds disappeared in Jocotoco Antpitta (G. ridgelyi). However, Heinz the undergrowth again” (pers. comm. in Heinz (2002) concluded that there was no direct sup- 2002). Similar intense intraspecific aggression in port for this hypothesis: he documented signifi- other antpitta species has been previously docu- cant territorial overlap between the two species, mented, albeit rarely. For example, a direct fight and a distinct lack of response by each species to between a pair of wild Rufous Antpittas (Grallaria the territorial calls of the other. Anecdotally, only rufula) was observed, which resulted in the birds mild aggression between the Jocotoco Antpitta “rolling down the slope as a ball” (Krabbe and and other birds at worm-feeders has been previ- Schulenberg 2003). In captivity at the Bronx Zoo, ously reported. Worm-feeders are a recently a male Rufous-faced Antpitta (Grallaria erythro- developed phenomenon driven by the eco- tis) purportedly killed its female partner in a fight tourism industry as reliable means for tourists (Bell and Bruning 1976). to see generally furtive species such as antpittas. The increasing prevalence of these feeding sta- Ecology tions may encourage the association of antpittas and other vermivorous birds (Greeney 2012). Interspecific aggression in all antpittas, and in the Greeney (2013) suggested that in such settings Jocotoco Antpitta in particular, has rarely been the Jocotoco Antpitta is “apparently not aggres- directly documented. However, there is consider- sive towards the similarly-sized Chestnut-naped able circumstantial evidence to suggest that the Antpitta...” In contrast to these findings, our Jocotoco Antpitta and its close relative the Chest- observations provide the first concrete evidence nut-naped Antpitta (Krabbe et al. 1999) may com- for interspecific competition between G. ridgelyi pete for resources and territory. The Jocotoco and G. nuchalis. Antpitta is found on steep slopes of the Andes, in wet montane forest with a low canopy and exten- Materials and Methods sive cover between 2,300 and 2,680 m in elevation. This species primarily exploits the lower The events described here took place on the part of the forest (below 4 m), and is often seen morning of 19 March 2013 in the vicinity of a on the ground (Ridgely and Greenfield 2001; worm-feeder adjacent to the Tapichalaca Biolog- Heinz et al. 2005; Greeney 2013). The Chestnut- ical Reserve (see Greeney and Juiña 2010 for a naped Antpitta occurs in a more extensive geo- detailed site description). The Fundación de Con- graphical range (and a greater elevational range of servación Jocotoco (www.fjocotoco.org) estab- 2,000 to 3,000 m), but it occupies nearly identical lished the worm-feeder discussed here in 2005, habitat, and is found in sympatry with the Joco- specifically to attract Jocotoco Antpittas (Woods toco Antpitta where the latter species exists et al. 2011). (Krabbe et al. 1999; Ridgely and Greenfield 2001). We arrived at the feeder at 1006 h ECT Interestingly, both Grallaria ridgelyi and G. (Ecuador Time) accompanied by a guide from the nuchalis (along with several others in this ) Fundación de Conservación Jocotoco. During our have been reported to engage facultatively in feed- visit we observed two adult Jocotoco Antpittas, a ing associations, periodically following army ant single Chestnut-naped Antpitta, and direct com- swarms, as well as large mammals (including petitive interactions between these two species humans) that are crashing through vegetation (Figure 1). The first adult Jocotoco Antpitta was (Greeney 2012). Stomach content analysis of G. already present at the feeder on our arrival. It ridgelyi and G. nuchalis has revealed nearly iden- began collecting earthworms that were regularly tical diets, including millipedes, beetles, ants, and tossed onto a stone platform by the guide. A sec- arthropod larvae (Krabbe and Schulenberg 2003). ond Jocotoco Antipitta adult soon joined the first, In spite of these ecological similarities, previ- and they alternated gathering worms from the ous work has failed to show any association feeder until the supply was exhausted at 1048 h between the two species. Heinz (2002) hypothe- (see Figure 1B). A typical feeding cycle consisted of sized that Grallaria ridgelyi and G. nuchalis may the antpitta ingesting some worms, followed by a compete for resources, with implications for period of gathering worms to store in the bill or Interspecific Competition in Grallaria Antpittas • Snow et al. 91

FIGURE 1. Jocotoco Antpitta, Grallaria ridgelyi, and Chestnut-naped Antpitta, G. nuchalis, at a worm-feeder at the Tapichalaca Reserve, southern Ecuador, on 19 March 2013. A, Adult G. ridgelyi performing characteristic hoo-coo call, 1034 h ECT. B, Adult G. ridgelyi collecting the last remaining worms from the feeding platform, 1048 h ECT. C, Adult G. nuchalis approaching empty feeding platform, 1055 h ECT, with feathers ruffled in response to approach from G. ridgelyi. D, Adult G. nuchalis standing at empty feeding platform at 1104 h ECT, immedi- ately before being chased away by an adult G. ridgelyi.

perhaps crop, and then leaving for several minutes grrr call has been described as a territorial chal- before returning and repeating this process. Our lenge-seeking call (Heinz 2002). Our observations companion from the Fundación Jocotoco, who suggest that this call may also be used as a contact was familiar with these local birds, indicated that call within pairs. these two adults were a mated pair carrying worms One individual Chestnut-naped Antpitta first to a nestling nearby, which we did not directly appeared in the area at 1053 h, attracted by whis- observe. Throughout this interval the two Joco- tles from the Fundación Jocotoco guide. It toco Antpitta individuals often called to one approached tentatively from the opposite side of another with the characteristic hoo-coo call, to the clearing relative to the Jocotoco Antpittas at a which they owe their common name (Ridgely and moment when no Jocotoco Antpittas were pres- Greenfield 2001; see Figure 1A). We noted that ent. The Chestnut-naped Antpitta remained at the one individual would always call first, followed empty feeding platform until 1055 h, and within seconds by a response with the same call departed quickly when a Jocotoco Antpitta from the second individual. This hoo-coo or ho- arrived (see Figure 1C). 92 Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History 56(1) • April 2015

At 1059 h, again when no Jocotoco Antpittas others (Woods et al. 2011; Greeney 2013). The were visible, a Chestnut-naped Antpitta appeared Jocotoco Antpittas we observed were purportedly and approached tentatively, taking a few steps and provisioning a nestling at the time. It may be that then pausing for several seconds, becoming erect competition for food is at its highest during the and alert before again proceeding forward another nestling provisioning period, and that previous few steps. It advanced in this way until it arrived at reports derive from nonbreeding periods. If this the feeder at 1103 h (see Figure 1D). At 1104 h, a is the case, it could indicate previously underap- Jocotoco Antpitta emerged from the ground veg- preciated temporal variation in interspecific com- etation and began to run toward the Chestnut- petition in grallariids. Future research may focus naped Antpitta, which quickly retreated. The on whether sympatric antpittas stagger breeding Jocotoco Antpitta did not pursue the Chestnut- periods so as not to overlap during this potentially naped Antpitta out of sight, and the chase ended as demanding time. soon as the Chestnut-naped Antpitta disappeared into the underbrush at the edge of the clearing. Acknowledgments The third and final interaction between the two species occurred when the Chestnut-naped We would like to thank our friends at the Fun- Antpitta returned to find a Jocotoco Antpitta at dación de Conservación Jocotoco and the Tapicha- the empty feeding platform at 1109 h. At the laca Biological Reserve for their admirable work appearance of the Chestnut-naped Antpitta, the to conserve these fascinating birds. We would also Jocotoco Antpitta became visibly agitated, ruffled like to thank Dr. Kristof Zyskowski of the Yale its feathers, and chased the Chestnut-naped Peabody Museum of Natural History and Dr. Antpitta far from the clearing at high speed, fol- Harold Greeney of the Yanayacu Biological Sta- lowing it up a slope and out of sight. It was unclear tion for reviewing this manuscript and provid- whether both or just one of the adult Jocotoco ing many helpful comments. The authors Antpittas engaged in this aggressive behavior. acknowledge the following sources of funding: Yale University (Snow, Musser, and Field); National Discussion Sciences and Engineering Research Council Canada Graduate Scholarship D and Smithsonian This aggressive interaction is a curious window Predoctoral Fellowship (to Field); and National into the ecology of an extremely rare and little- Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow- known bird. In contrast to previous findings, the ship under grant no. DGE-1122492 (Snow and Jocotoco Antpitta may indeed engage in resource Musser). competition with other closely related, sympatric Grallaria antpittas. Though playback experiments Received 30 May 2014; revised and accepted 19 have failed to reveal interspecific aggression December 2014. between these two species, we have observed directly that they do interact aggressively, with the Literature Cited larger Jocotoco Antpitta appearing to represent the BELL, J., AND D. BRUNING. 1976. Hatching and handrearing the dominant combatant (Heinz 2002). It could be that Rufous-faced Antpitta. Notes on antbirds kept at the New in certain contexts playback experiments may sim- York Zoological Park. Avicultural Magazine 82:119–122. ply be inconclusive, failing to reveal physical con- FREILE, J.F., J L. PARRA AND C.H. GRAHAM. 2010. Distribution flict over food resources, as opposed to mere vocal and conservation of Grallaria and Grallaricula antpittas conflict. In this case we have shown that aggres- (Grallariidae) in Ecuador. Bird Conservation International 20(4):410–431. sive interactions between G. ridgelyi and G. GREENEY, H.F. 2012. Antpittas and worm-feeders: A match nuchalis apparently consist of silent chasing and made by evolution? Evidence for a possible commensal for- posturing rather than vocalizing. These would nat- aging relationship between antpittas (Grallariidae) and urally be overlooked in a playback experiment. mammals. Neotropical Biology and Conservation 7(2):140– Perhaps more curious is the contrast between 143. —2013. Jocotoco Antpitta (Grallaria ridgelyi). Neotropical our findings of violent interspecific aggression Birds Online. T.S. Schulenberg, ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Lab between Grallaria ridgelyi and G. nuchalis and of . Available from: http://neotropical.birds.cor those of previous observations at this feeder and nell.edu/portal/species/overview?p_p_spp ϭ 404361 Interspecific Competition in Grallaria Antpittas • Snow et al. 93

GREENEY, H.F., R.C. DOBBS, P.R. MARTIN AND R.A. GELIS. 2008. KRABBE, N., D.J. AGRO, N.H. RICE, M. JACOME, L. NAVARRETE The breeding biology of Grallaria and Grallaricula antpit- AND F. S ORNOZA M. 1999. A new species of antpitta (Formi- tas. Journal of Field Ornithology 79:113–129. cariidae: Grallaria) from the southern Ecuadorian Andes. GREENEY, H.F. AND M.E. JUIÑA J. 2010. First description of the The Auk 116:882–890. nest of Jocotoco Antpitta (Grallaria ridgelyi). Wilson Journal KRABBE, N. AND T. S CHULENBERG. 2003. Family Formicariidae of Ornithology 122:392–395. (Ground-antbirds). In: J. del Hoyo, A. Elliott and J. Sargatal, HEINZ, M. 2002. Ecology, habitat, and distribution of the Joco- eds. Handbook of the Birds of the World. Volume 8, Broad- toco Antpitta (Formicariidae: Grallaria ridgelyi) in south bills to Tapaculos. Barcelona, Spain: Lynx Edicions. pp. Ecuador [dissertation]. Münster: Institute of Landscape 682–731. Ecology, University of Münster. Available from the author. RIDGELY, R.S. AND P. J. G REENFIELD. 2001. Birds of Ecuador. HEINZ, M., V. SCHMIDT AND M. SCHAEFER. 2005. New distrib- Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. utional record for the Jocotoco Antpitta Grallaria ridgelyi in WOODS, S., N. ATHANAS AND S. OLMSTEAD. 2011. Antpitta par- south Ecuador. Cotinga 23:24–26. adise: A 2010 update. Birding 8:4–10.