DOCSLIB.ORG

Xenophon (Oxford Readings in Classical Studies)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Xenophon (Oxford Readings in Classical Studies) OXFORD READINGS IN CLASSICAL STUDIES The series provides students and scholars with a representative se- lection of the best and most inXuential articles on a particular author, work, or subject. No single school or style of approach is privileged: the aim is to oVer a broad overview of scholarship, to cover a wide variety of topics, and to illustrate a diversity of critical methods. The collections are particularly valuable for their inclusion of many important essays, which are normally diYcult to obtain, and for the Wrst-ever translations of some of the pieces. Many articles are thoroughly revised and updated by their authors or are provided with addenda taking account of recent work. Each volume includes an authoritative and wide-ranging introduction by the editor survey- ing the scholarly tradition and considering alternative approaches. This pulls the individual articles together, setting all the pieces included in their historical and cultural contexts and exploring sig- niWcant connections between them from the perspective of contem- porary scholarship. All foreign languages (including Greek and Latin) are translated to make the texts easily accessible to those without detailed linguistic knowledge. OXFORD READINGS IN CLASSICAL STUDIES Aeschylus Edited by Michael Lloyd Ovid Edited by Peter E. Knox The Attic Orators Edited by Edwin Carawan Lucretius Edited by Monica R. Gale Catullus Edited by Julia Haig Gaisser Seneca Edited by John G. Fitch Vergil’s Eclogues Edited by Katharina Volk Vergil’s Georgics Edited by Katharina Volk Homer’s Odyssey Edited by Lillian E. Doherty Livy Edited by Jane D. Chaplin and Christina S. Kraus Horace: Odes and Epodes Edited by Miche`le Lowrie Horace: Satires and Epistles Edited by Kirk Freudenburg Thucydides Edited by JeVrey S. Rusten Lucan Edited by Charles Tesoriero, with Frances Muecke and Tamara Neal Xenophon Edited by Vivienne J. Gray All available in paperback Oxford Readings in Classical Studies Xenophon Edited by VIVIENNE J. GRAY 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford ox2 6dp Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With oYces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York q Oxford University Press 2010 The moral rights of the authors have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2010 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose the same condition on any acquirer British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Data available Typeset by SPI Publisher Services, Pondicherry, India Printed in Great Britain on acid-free paper by CPI Antony Rowe, Chippenham, Wiltshire ISBN 978–0–19–921617–8 (Hbk) 978–0–19–921618–5 (Pbk) 13579108642 Contents Preface ix Introduction 1 V. J. Gray I. STATUS AND GENDER 1. Slavery in the Greek Domestic Economy in the Light of Xenophon’s Oeconomicus 31 S. B. Pomeroy 2. Xenophon’s Foreign Wives 41 Emily Baragwanath 3. Xenophon on Male Love 72 CliVord Hindley II. DEMOCRACY 4. Le Programme de Xe´nophon dans les Poroi (Xenophon’s Programme in the Poroi) 113 Philippe Gauthier 5. Virtuous Toil, Vicious Work: Xenophon on Aristocratic Style 137 Steven Johnstone 6. The Seductions of the Gaze: Socrates and his Girlfriends 167 Simon Goldhill III. SOCRATES 7. Xenophon’s Socrates as Teacher 195 D. R. Morrison vi Contents 8. Der Xenophontische Sokrates als Dialektiker (Xenophon’s Socrates as Dialectician) 228 Andreas Patzer 9. The Dancing Sokrates and the Laughing Xenophon, or the Other Symposium 257 Bernhard Huss 10. L’exe´ge`se strausienne de Xe´nophon: le cas paradigmatique de Me´morables IV 4 (The Straussian Exegesis of Xenophon: The Paradigmatic Case of Memorabilia IV 4) 283 Louis-Andre´ Dorion IV. CYROPAEDIA 11. L’ide´e de monarchie imperiale dans la Cyrope´die de Xe´nophon (The Idea of Imperial Monarchy in Xenophon’s Cyropaedia) 327 Pierre Carlier 12. Fictional Narrative in the Cyropaideia 367 Philip Stadter 13. Die Frage nach dem ´ˇ ¯Õ˜`Ì˝. Die Begegnung zwischen Kyros und Kroisos bei Xenophon (The Question of the ´ˇ ¯Õ˜`Ì˝: The Encounter between Cyrus and Croesus in Xenophon) 401 Eckard Lefe`vre 14. Xenophon’s Cyropaedia and the Hellenistic Novel 418 Michael Reichel 15. The Death of Cyrus: Xenophon’s Cyropaedia as a Source for Iranian History 439 Heleen Sancisi-Weerdenburg V. HISTORICAL WRITING 16. The Sources for the Spartan Debacle at Haliartus 457 H. D. Westlake 17. Xenophon’s Anabasis 476 Hartmut Erbse Contents vii 18. You Can’t Go Home Again: Displacement and Identity in Xenophon’s Anabasis 502 John Ma 19. Irony and the Narrator in Xenophon’s Anabasis 520 P. J. Bradley 20. Interventions and Citations in Xenophon’s Hellenica and Anabasis 553 V. J. Gray Bibliography 573 This page intentionally left blank Preface Note on translation. Translations of the contributions in French and German are based on those provided by Oxford University Press. Quotations in Greek and Latin in the original versions of the con- tributions have been edited and/or translated in square brackets where significant, as have quotations in modern languages other than English. Acknowledgements. My thanks to the community of Xenophontic scholars, who have made this volume possible, and have made assembling it such a pleasure. The bibliography is largely the work of Simon Oswald, an alumnus of Auckland University, who also unicoded the Greek. Referencing is Harvard style. Abbreviations are according to the method of the original paper. This page intentionally left blank Introduction Vivienne J. Gray XENOPHON’S WORKS AND CONTROVERSIES ABOUT HOW TO READ THEM Xenophon is a major voice of the fourth century bc.1 His works innovate within existing literary genres and they pioneer entirely new ones. Anabasis and Hellenica develop the tradition of historical writing, while Memorabilia, Oeconomicus, Symposium, and Hiero develop the literary dialogue. Cyropaedia is our Wrst focused example of ‘mirror of princes’ literature, and Agesilaus sets a pattern for encomiastic biography. Xenophon left us our Wrst example of politeia literature, which describes the laws and customs that made Sparta successful (Respublica Lacedaemoniorum (RL)), our earliest work on economic reform (Poroi), and our Wrst technical handbooks, on horses and hunting with hounds (de Re Equestri, Hipparchicus, Cynegeticus). In short, his literary innovations were so many that it is diYcult to do them justice in a single volume of Oxford Readings. He was so highly regarded that all of his writings were preserved, and one (Respublica Atheniensium) credited to him as an extra.2 1 The works are translated with English titles in Loeb Classical Library, Penguin Classics, Oxford World Classics and in various editions and commentaries. 2 Ath.Pol. is not directly covered in this volume; see Gray (2007a) 49–58 for introduction and commentary. 2 Introduction In detail, Anabasis describes Xenophon’s own experiences with the Ten Thousand Greek mercenaries recruited by the Persian prince Cyrus the Younger for the war against his brother the King Artaxerxes in 401/400 bc; it is the Wrst account in which an author is shown playing a large part in the events he describes, and it examines the problems of leadership through the narrator’s self-representation, as well as the presentation of Cyrus and other leaders of the mercenar- ies; it is a rich source for our knowledge of the western Persian empire. Hellenica is our main source for Greek history from the closing years of the Peloponnesian War down to the battle of Man- tinea in 362 bc; it continues Thucydides and makes an issue of the problem of praise and blame in historical writing.3 Memorabilia is a new literary vehicle for the presentation of Socrates; it combines a rhetorical defence against the charges of his trial (that he corrupted the young and harmed the polis by not worshipping in the prescribed manner) with a series of short self-contained conversations describ- ing how he helped his fellow citizens to achieve virtue and manage their aVairs as leaders of their households and of Athens; it oVers an image of Socrates very diVerent from Plato’s. This is also the image found in his other Socratic works: Oeconomicus, which is our earliest account of the management of a farming estate, Symposium, an account of Socrates and his companions at play in a drinking party, and the Defence of Socrates, which justiWes Socrates’ refusal to deliver a proper defence at his trial.4 Hiero is a dialogue on whether the ruler has greater happiness than his subjects, being the only extant treatment of this popular topic and one of the few extant dialogues in which Socrates does not Wgure.5 Agesilaus sets a pattern for encomiastic biography with its combination of a narrative of the career of the Spartan King Agesilaus followed by separate sections on each of his virtues.6 RL systematically praises the laws that were introduced by Lycurgus to produce the social and military practices that made Sparta successful.7 Cyropaedia reveals the secrets 3 See the section on historical writing in this volume for Anabasis and Hellenica.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Moderately Ironic Reading of Xenophon's Oeconomicus
    David M. JOHNSON Ischomachus the Model Husband? A Moderately Ironic Reading of Xenophon's Oeconomicus Xenophon's Oeconomicus is usually considered a treatise on household management masquerading as a Socratic dialogue (Pomeroy). But for others the reverse is true (Strauss and the Straussians; see also Mackenzie and Nails in EMC 1985, Too's review of Pomeroy in CR 1995, and the less orthodox Straussian Stevens). How one comes down on this issue will obviously affect one's evaluation of Ischomachus' relationship with his wife, and of Xenophon as a Socratic writer. I argue that the Oeconomicus is both Socratic and economic, both didactic and ironic. Xenophon chose Ischomachus because both his virtues and his vices have much to teach Critobulus, Socrates' immediate interlocutor, and Xenophon's readers. Our Ischomachus is probably the man whose wife went on to become the Chrysilla who would marry and bear a son to her son-in-law Callias, driving her daughter to attempt suicide (Andocides 1.124-127). There may be evidence for this in Oeconomicus itself. Callias would fall for Chrysilla again when she was "an old battleaxe" (Andocides 1.127); Ischomachus promises his wife that she can maintain her status even in old age (Oec. 7.20). The scandals which would beset Chrysilla and her children may shed light on Ischomachus' otherwise odd failure to say much about children to the wife he had married in large part for the sake of children. There are other ironies. Ischomachus hardly shares Socrates' understanding of property as that one knows how to use. Critobulus, in fact, is evidently already rich enough in conventional terms: he needs another sort of help.
    [Show full text]
  • Oikos and Economy: the Greek Legacy in Economic Thought
    Oikos and Economy: The Greek Legacy in Economic Thought GREGORY CAMERON In the study of the history of economic thought, there has been a tendency to take the meaning of the term “economics” for granted. As a consequence, when considering economic thought in ancient Greece, we turn to what the Greeks said about wealth, about money or about interest. This seems relatively straightforward. Problems emerge when we consider that the term “economics” had a different meaning in ancient Greece than it does today. As a rule, we project back onto history what we mean by “economics” and more or less ignore what it meant during the period in question. On one level, there is nothing wrong with this way of proceeding; after all we have no choice, ultimately, but to study the past with the concepts that are at our disposal. But the procedure can have certain drawbacks. The tendency of positive investigations is that they risk overlooking the kinds of transformations that give rise to our own concerns and even what is essential to our own thought and assumptions. The term “economics” has a long and varied history; the following is a brief attempt to turn things on their head and consider the history of economics not from the perspective of the modern notion of economics, but from the perspective of its ancient Greek ancestor and to begin to indicate the non-obvious ways in which the Greek legacy continues to inform even our most recent economies. As such, while brief mention is made of some modern economic historians, the primary focus is on the meaning of PhaenEx 3, no.
    [Show full text]
  • Agorapicbk-17.Pdf
    Excavations of the Athenian Agora Picture Book No. 17 Prepared by Mabel L. Lang Dedicated to Eugene Vanderpool o American School of Classical Studies at Athens ISBN 87661-617-1 Produced by the Meriden Gravure Company Meriden, Connecticut COVER: Bone figure of Socrates TITLE PAGE: Hemlock SOCRATES IN THE AGORA AMERICAN SCHOOL OF CLASSICAL STUDIES AT ATHENS PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY 1978 ‘Everything combines to make our knowledge of Socrates himself a subject of Socratic irony. The only thing we know definitely about him is that we know nothing.’ -L. Brunschvicg As FAR AS we know Socrates himselfwrote nothing, yet not only were his life and words given dramatic attention in his own time in the Clouds of Ar- istophanes, but they have also become the subject of many others’ writing in the centuries since his death. Fourth-century B.C. writers who had first-hand knowledge of him composed either dialogues in which he was the dominant figure (Plato and Aeschines) or memories of his teaching and activities (Xe- nophon). Later authors down even to the present day have written numerous biographies based on these early sources and considering this most protean of philosophers from every possible point of view except perhaps the topograph- ical one which is attempted here. Instead of putting Socrates in the context of 5th-century B.C. philosophy, politics, ethics or rhetoric, we shall look to find him in the material world and physical surroundings of his favorite stamping- grounds, the Athenian Agora. Just as ‘agora’ in its original sense meant ‘gathering place’ but came in time to mean ‘market place’, so the agora itself was originally a gathering place I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Roman Army (200 BC – AD 476)
    Impact of Empire 6 IMEM-6-deBlois_CS2.indd i 5-4-2007 8:35:52 Impact of Empire Editorial Board of the series Impact of Empire (= Management Team of the Network Impact of Empire) Lukas de Blois, Angelos Chaniotis Ségolène Demougin, Olivier Hekster, Gerda de Kleijn Luuk de Ligt, Elio Lo Cascio, Michael Peachin John Rich, and Christian Witschel Executive Secretariat of the Series and the Network Lukas de Blois, Olivier Hekster Gerda de Kleijn and John Rich Radboud University of Nijmegen, Erasmusplein 1, P.O. Box 9103, 6500 HD Nijmegen, The Netherlands E-mail addresses: [email protected] and [email protected] Academic Board of the International Network Impact of Empire geza alföldy – stéphane benoist – anthony birley christer bruun – john drinkwater – werner eck – peter funke andrea giardina – johannes hahn – fik meijer – onno van nijf marie-thérèse raepsaet-charlier – john richardson bert van der spek – richard talbert – willem zwalve VOLUME 6 IMEM-6-deBlois_CS2.indd ii 5-4-2007 8:35:52 The Impact of the Roman Army (200 BC – AD 476) Economic, Social, Political, Religious and Cultural Aspects Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop of the International Network Impact of Empire (Roman Empire, 200 B.C. – A.D. 476) Capri, March 29 – April 2, 2005 Edited by Lukas de Blois & Elio Lo Cascio With the Aid of Olivier Hekster & Gerda de Kleijn LEIDEN • BOSTON 2007 This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC 4.0 License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
    [Show full text]
  • Divine Narratives in Xenophon's Anabasis
    Histos 10 (2016) 85–110 DIVINE NARRATIVES IN XENOPHON’S ANABASIS* Abstract: This paper builds on recent work that has focused on the interplay between Xeno- phon the narrator and Xenophon the character in the Anabasis. It illustrates how crucial the divine is in the construction of Xenophon’s character and the overall shape of the narrative. By referring to oracles, dreams and sacrifices, as well as his divine estate at Scillus, Xeno- phon the narrator contributes substantively towards wider thematic concerns in the narra- tive: the meaningful rôle of the divine in warfare; Xenophon’s stellar record during this opaque foreign campaign, and the signal connection between piety and good leadership. Keywords: Xenophon, Anabasis, divine, leadership, narrator, religion οὐ μόνον ἐς Πέρσας ἀνέβη Ξενοφῶν διὰ Κῦρον, ἀλλ' ἄνοδον ζητῶν ἐς Διὸς ἥτις ἄγοι. Not only on account of Cyrus did Xenophon march up towards Persia, but also seeking a road that would lead to Zeus. —Diogenes Laertius1 begin this paper by quoting from one of Xenophon’s most influential modern readers, J. K. Anderson, specifically his interpretation of Xeno- Iphon’s attitude towards supernatural phenomena: Xenophon’s education in religion and politics, whatever it may have owed to Socrates, was, like his moral instruction, not complicated by abstract speculations. Throughout his life, Xenophon remained the sort of conservative whose acceptance of the doctrines and principles that he has inherited seems either unintelligent, or dishonest, or both, to those who do not share them.2 * A special vote of thanks must go to Joe Skinner and the Classics and Ancient History department at the University of Newcastle for first inviting me to give this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Sophrosyne in Xenophon’S Oeconomicus
    166 ECONOMIC SELF- RESTRAINT An interpretation of Ischomachus’ use of sophrosyne in Xenophon’s Oeconomicus MA Thesis Classics and Ancient Civilizations Supervisor: Dr. T.A. van Berkel Second reader: Dr. A.M. Rademaker Word count: 16.494 Date of submission: 12-08-2019 Aniek Vink s1665235 [email protected] Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Chapter 1: a semantic study of sophrosyne ............................................................................................. 4 1.1. General uses ................................................................................................................................. 4 1.2. Plato’s philosophical uses ............................................................................................................ 8 1.3. Relation to enkrateia .................................................................................................................... 9 Chapter 2: Socrates’ sophrosyne ........................................................................................................... 11 2.1. Good sense to avoid harming others .......................................................................................... 11 2.1.1. Xenophon’s apologetic definition ....................................................................................... 11 2.1.2. Socrates’ philosophical definition ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • De Novis Libris Iudicia 247 XENOPHON: Hiero the Tyrant And
    De novis libris iudicia 247 XENOPHON: Hiero the Tyrant and Other Treatises. Translated by ROBIN WATERFIELD, with introductions and notes by PAUL CARTLEDGE. Penguin Books, London – New York 1997. ISBN 0-14-044682-6. xxxi, 248 pp. GBP 7.99 / USD 13.95. Waterfield had previously published, together with H. Tredennick, the Memoirs of Socrates in 1990 in a volume entitled Conversations of Socrates in the same Penguin Classics. Now he presents a new translation of Hiero, Agesilaus, Hipparchicus, De re equestri, Cynegeticus, and Poroi. The six treatises are translated from Marchant's Oxford edition from 1920 (he would have had some more recent editions at his disposal, but neglecting them may not have caused any great harm); at the end of the volume the reader is offered some textual notes. Waterfield's translations seem to be – if a non-native speaker of English be permitted to judge – clear and accurate. The volume is opened by Paul Cartledge's succinct and well-written Introduction. Heikki Solin MELISSA S. LANE: Method and Politics in Plato's Statesman. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1998. ISBN 0-521-58229-6. 229 pp. GBP 35. Until quite recently, the interest in Plato's so-called late dialogues has been considerably weaker than in the dialogues considered earlier. In the latter, language, style and drama are often more elaborate, and thus they are more enjoyable to read as well as, sometimes, easier to understand. Even among the less entertaining late dialogues, the Statesman has sometimes been judged as exceptionally dull. With the new interest in the philosophical content of the late dialogues, several studies have shown that an assiduous inquiry into this neglected side of Plato has much to offer.
    [Show full text]
  • Cicero on the Philosophy of Religion
    CICERO ON THE PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION: DE NATURA DEORUM AND DE DIVINATIONE. A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by John Patrick Frederick Wynne January 2008 CICERO ON THE PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION: DE NATURA DEORUM AND DE DIVINATIONE. John Patrick Frederick Wynne, Ph. D. Cornell University, 2008 Cicero wrote de Natura Deorum (dND), de Divinatione (Div.) and de Fato (Fat.) in succession and describes the latter two as continuations of the first. I argue that the three dialogues form a trilogy, in which Cicero as author indicates a stance on the material he presents (but that too little of the fragmentary Fat. remains to be useful for my purposes). There are much-debated attributions of preferences to Cicero’s propriae personae at the conclusions of dND and Div.; I take these preferences to express Cicero’s authorial stance. I examine relevant parts of the speeches to which they react and, first, make philosophical interpretations of each (often comparing other sources for Hellenistic thought) and, second, pay attention to the interaction of Cicero’s characterization of each speaker with the arguments the speaker gives. I find that Balbus in dND advocates the avoidance of superstition and the reform of religious beliefs in line with Stoic physics and that Cotta has a strong commitment to traditional Roman religious views consistent with his sceptical epistemology. Cotta’s scepticism is elusive in its details but perhaps yields a kind of fideism. I find that Quintus Cicero’s advocacy in Div.
    [Show full text]
  • A Companion to Socrates
    A Companion to Socrates i ACTA01 1 22/11/05, 12:05 PM Blackwell Companions to Philosophy This outstanding student reference series offers a comprehensive and authoritative survey of philosophy as a whole. Written by today’s leading philosophers, each volume provides lucid and engaging coverage of the key figures, terms, topics, and problems of the field. Taken together, the volumes provide the ideal basis for course use, representing an unparalleled work of refer- ence for students and specialists alike. Already published in the series: 19. A Companion to Environmental Philosophy 1. The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy, Edited by Dale Jamieson Second Edition 20. A Companion to Analytic Philosophy Edited by Nicholas Bunnin and Eric Tsui-James Edited by A. P. Martinich and David Sosa 2. A Companion to Ethics 21. A Companion to Genethics Edited by Peter Singer Edited by Justine Burley and John Harris 3. A Companion to Aesthetics 22. A Companion to Philosophical Logic Edited by David Cooper Edited by Dale Jacquette 4. A Companion to Epistemology 23. A Companion to Early Modern Philosophy Edited by Jonathan Dancy and Ernest Sosa Edited by Steven Nadler 5. A Companion to Contemporary Political 24. A Companion to Philosophy in Philosophy the Middle Ages Edited by Robert E. Goodin and Philip Pettit Edited by Jorge J. E. Gracia and 6. A Companion to Philosophy of Mind Timothy B. Noone Edited by Samuel Guttenplan 25. A Companion to African-American 7. A Companion to Metaphysics Philosophy Edited by Jaegwon Kim and Ernest Sosa Edited by Tommy L. Lott and John P.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Indices Index locorum Achilles Tatius 8.10-13, 164 1.1.2-1.2.1, 181 8.25-9.10, 261 1.15.1-2, 175 11.1.1, 245 3.5.6-4.19, 231 11.28.6, 296 3.10.6, 177 Aristoteles 3.23.4, 177 Rh. 1357a-b, 27 4.12.1, 178 1416b, 21 5.15.3-5.16.7, 180 Augustinus 5.15-17.1, 232 Ep. 138.19, 273 7.1.3, 107 Beroaldus Aelius Aristides 1500 comm. Apul. Met. 1vo, 273 49.38, 137 Apul. Met. 150vo, 279 Alciphron Apul. Met. 154vo, 277 ep. 1.22, 181 Apul. Met. 160vo, 281 Alexander Romance Apul. Met. 164, 286 3.2, 168 Apul. Met. 166vo, 275 Aphthonius Chariton Progymn. 2, 21 1.1.1, 13, 37, 52 Apocolocyntosis 1.1.2-3, 51 1.1-2, 4 1.11.1-3, 226 Apuleius 2.3.10, 71 Apol. 4.1, 259 2.5.2, 73 Fl. 13.3, 247 2.9.4-5, 58 20.5-6, 244 3.4.18, 55 Met. 1.1.4, 296 3.7.1-3, 62 1.2.5, 262 3.10.2, 62 1.6.2, 274 5.1, 226 2.12, 164 5.1.3-7, 227 2.28.3, 292 5.2.1, 70 4.35.4, 253 5.3.9, 70 5.19.5, 254 5.3.10, 67 5.22.6, 246 5.9.3, 75 5.26.6, 288 6.3-5, 10 5.30.1, 255 6.8.6-7, 72 6.18.6, 257 7.1.9, 76 6.29.3, 278 7.3.4, 72 7.15.3, 277 7.6.9, 107 7.23.3, 281 8.1.4, 39 7.27.5, 286 8.2.1-3, 57 350 INDICES 8.3.2, 74 Krinagoras 8.7, 41 AP 6.25, 143 8.8.13-14, 42 Letters of Apollonios of Tyana 8.8.16, 37 no.
    [Show full text]
  • The Art of Horsemanship
    m fW^^M^m-M JBB"' XENOPHON ON HORSEMANSHIP. THE ART OF HORSEMANSHIP. BY XENOPHON. TRANSLATED, WITH CHAPTERS ON THE GREEK RIDING-HORSE AND WITH NOTES, BY MORRIS H. MORGAN, Ph.D. Assistant Professor in Harvard University. Proficies nihil hoc, caedas licet usque, flagello. BOSTON: LITTLE, BROWN, AND COMPANY. 1893. Copyright, 1893, By Morris H. Morgan. Uniijcrsitg Pass: John Wilson and Son, Cambridge, U.S.A. PREFACE. Among technical treatises, that of Xeno- phon on Horsemanship is almost unique in one particular. Even after more than twenty- three centuries it is still, in the main, a sound and excellent guide for so much of the field as it covers. This fact, together with the simple and delightful manner in which the subject is treated, has led me to think that some who are not able or do not care to approach the book in the original Greek, might like to read a translation of the earli- est known work on the horse and how to ride him. To be sure, there have already been versions in English ; but these seem to me, and have seemed to others, unsatisfactory. My translation is made from the Greek text of Dindorf's Oxford edition. Two well-known special editions of the treatise I ; VI PREFACE. have found very useful. These are by Courier, with notes and a translation into French, first published in Paris in 1813, and by Jacobs, with notes and a German version, Gotha, 1825. Hermann's essay, **De verbis quibus Graeci incessum equorum indicant," is indispensable for the study of certain parts of the treatise.
    [Show full text]
  • Homo Oeconomicus: Useful Abstraction Or Perversion of Reality?
    BEHAVIOURAL ECONOMICS Homo Oeconomicus: Useful Abstraction or Perversion of Reality? Sophie Donnelly, Senior Sophister Grounded upon a theoretical basis, this paper draws into a fundamen- tal critique of a key assumption made in most economic theory, and that is the constructed homo oeconomicus or economic man. This paper conducts this evaluation by delving into the beginning of the economic man and its common applications in the field of economics. Then subse- quently discussing its advance from its origins in the writings of Smith and Mill to the modern day. Following this the argument will consider- ing two key criticisms of economic man through both behavioural and feminist economists, before lastly evaluating the potential alternatives we can use instead of the economic man in the context of an increasing- ly complex, diverse and globalised economic landscape. Introduction ine years before The Wealth of Nations, the English economist Sir James NSteuart wrote: Were everyone to act for the public, and neglect himself, the statesman would be bewildered (Steuart, 1767: 221; cited in Brockway, 1993: 26). In the same way that Steuart s statesman prefers self-centred constituents as he believes their behaviour to be predictable in any situation, so too do econo- mists predict the behaviours of their most ubiquitous theoretical construct, eco- nomic man1. This self-maximising being, postulated initially by Adam Smith and fleshed out more thoroughly by Mill and his successors, was intended as a tool to generalise the complexity of human behaviour into a coherent economic science (Monbiot, 2016). Ha-Joon Chang articulates the common neoclassical concep- tion of economics as a study of rational choice [...] made on the basis of deliber- ate, systematic calculation of the maximum extent to which the ends can be met 95 STUDENT ECONOMIC REVIEW VOL.
    [Show full text]