SSSI Supporting Info Blackmore Vale Commons and Moors

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SSSI Supporting Info Blackmore Vale Commons and Moors West Pennine Moors SSSI Supporting Information A supplement to the notification document Issued by Natural England’s Cheshire, Greater Manchester, Merseyside & Lancashire Team on 17 November 2016 Contact points and further information This supplementary information to the West Pennine Moors SSSI notification document is issued on request by Natural England’s Cheshire, Greater Manchester, Merseyside & Lancashire Team and is intended to be read in conjunction with the notification document for owners, occupiers and other notified parties. Our address for correspondence is: Our address for correspondence is: West Pennine Moors SSSI Team Natural England Second floor, Arndale House The Arndale Centre Manchester M4 3AQ Telephone: 0300 060 0050 Email: [email protected] Online: please visit the following website and search for ‘West Pennine Moors’: https://consult.defra.gov.uk/consultation_finder/ Your contact point for enquiries relating to this notification is: the West Pennine Moors SSSI Team consisting of Rosemary Budd, Karen Rogers, Ben Hibbins and Amy Cowburn. Page 2 Contents 1. Summary 2. Information used to support the selection of the West Pennine Moors SSSI 3. Explanation of how the West Pennine Moors meets the SSSI selection guidelines 4. Site boundary determination 5. Assessment of the current condition of the West Pennine Moors SSSI 6. Selection of ‘operations requiring Natural England’s consent’ 7. Site unit maps 8. Distribution of priority habitats and other features within the West Pennine Moors 9. Photographs Page 3 1. Summary The West Pennine Moors SSSI is notified under section 28C of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended). The site supports an extensive mosaic of upland and upland-fringe habitats. It is of special interest for the following nationally important features that occur within and are supported by the wider habitat mosaic: • blanket bogs; • wet and dry heathlands; • acid and lime-rich flushes; • rush pastures and mire grasslands; • acid grasslands; • neutral hay meadows and pastures; • wet and dry broadleaved woodlands and scrub; • diverse assemblages of upland moorland, in-bye and woodland breeding birds; • breeding black-headed gulls Chroicocephalus ridibundus, Mediterranean gulls Larus melanocephalus and grey herons Ardea cinerea; and • populations of starry Alchemilla acutiloba and large-toothed lady’s-mantles A. subcrenata and floating water-plantain Luronium natans. Page 4 2. Information used to support the selection of the West Pennine Moors SSSI Feature Data Source Author Date Content General Guidelines for the Selection Nature 1989- National selection of Biological SSSIs. Part 2: Conservancy 1994 guidelines for biological Detailed Guidelines for Council SSSIs (re-published Habitats and Species (NCC)/JNCC online by JNCC in 2012) Groups. Chapters: 2a. Woodlands; 7. Fens; 8. Bogs; 9. Uplands; 11. Vascular plants. Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough British Plant Communities. Rodwell, J.S. 1991 National Vegetation Volume 1: Woodlands and (ed). Classification (NVC) for Scrub. Cambridge University woodlands and scrub Press communities British Plant Communities. Rodwell, J.S. 1991 National Vegetation Volume 2: Mires and Heaths. (ed). Classification (NVC) for Cambridge University Press fen-meadow communities British Plant Communities: Rodwell, J.S. 1992 National Vegetation Volume 3: Grasslands and (ed). Classification (NVC) for Montane Communities. lowland grassland Cambridge University Press communities British Plant Communities. Rodwell, J.S. 1995 National Vegetation Volume 4: Aquatic (ed). Classification NVC for communities, swamps and aquatic communities, tall-herb fens. Cambridge swamps and tall-herb University Press. fens West Pennine Moors: A Jepson, P., 2007 Discussion regarding the Conspectus for Statutory Melling, T. & proposal to designate the Designation. West Pennine Martin, S.J WPM as an SSSI Moors Biodiversity Group Addendum to West Pennine Jepson, P., 2008 Additional information Moors: A Conspectus for Martin, S.J supplementing the above Statutory Designation. West paper Pennine Moors Biodiversity Group. Guidelines for selection of Joint Nature 2013 Rationale, Operational biological SSSIs. Part 1: Conservation Approach and Criteria for Rationale, Operational Committee Site Selection Approach and Criteria for (JNCC) Site Selection Vegetation survey of the Skelcher, G. 2013 NVC survey, including West Pennine Moors Ecological quadrat data and maps moorland fringe. Report to Consultant Natural England Vegetation Survey of West Ross, S. (Penny 2014 NVC survey, including Pennine Moors pSSSI. Anderson field notes, quadrat data, Report to Natural England Associates) aerial photos, maps, records of rare/scarce plants and lichens Page 5 Feature Data Source Author Date Content Vegetation survey of twelve Skelcher, G. 2014 NVC survey, including sites considered for addition Ecological quadrat data and maps to the West Pennine Moors Consultant pSSSI. Report to Natural England Upland Nature Conservation Review Ratcliffe, D.A. 1977 Descriptors for the range habitats – Volume 1. Published by and feature of the British NCC uplands An Illustrated Guide to British Averis, B. et al. 2004 Upland vegetation Upland Vegetation. JNCC, Peterborough Consultation and production GeoData 2011 Description of survey of a recommended set of Institute methods and guidance standards for UK BAP habitat (University of regarding NVC type data. Volume 1: Southampton) choice. Specification for field survey and mapping to BAP Priority Habitats and Annex 1 Habitats; Volume 2: Translation frameworks and sample case studies; Volume 3: Definitions and rule bases for BAP Priority Habitats. Report to Natural England UK Biodiversity Action Plan – BRIG (ed. 2008 Descriptions of priority Priority Habitat Descriptions. Maddock, A.) update habitats Biodiversity Reporting and 2011 Information Group (BRIG) Specialist support for Crowle, A. 2016 Support for notifying the notification of West Pennine site for upland habitats Moors as a SSSI for uplands from Natural England’s senior uplands specialist Grassland A study into the effects of Jepson, P 1984 Records of plant species change in management on used for comparison. grasslands in the West Pennine Moors (Post- graduate diploma in Countryside Management 1st year project). Manchester Polytechnic English Nature Grassland English Nature 1986 Records of plant species Inventory; Quadrat data for used for comparison. Sunnyhurst Meadows, Darwen Neutral grassland sites in Stewart, A 1994 Records of plant species Lancashire to 1993. English (English Nature) used for comparison. Nature internal report Upland survey Higher MacDonal, D. 2003 Records of plant species Wenshead Farm. Lancashire used for comparison Rural Futures report Page 6 Feature Data Source Author Date Content Guidelines for the Selection Jefferson, R.G., 2014 National selection of Biological SSSIs. Part 2: Smith, S.L.N. & guidelines for SSSIs for Detailed Guidelines for MacKintosh, E.J. lowland grasslands Habitats and Species Groups. Chapter 3. Lowland grasslands. JNCC, Peterborough Specialist support for Jefferson, R.G. 2016 Support for notifying the notification of West Pennine site for grassland Moors as a SSSI for features from Natural grassland England’s senior grassland specialist Woodland Woodland surveys in north Stewart, A., 1993 Information on west England using the Donnison, E. & woodlands within the National Vegetation Dalton, A. wider Area of Search. Classification [and] Supplement: distribution maps of woodland NVC types north-west England 1992. English Nature internal report Longworth Clough – National Pennine 1999 NVC survey of Vegetation Classification Ecological Longworth Clough 1999. Report to Lancashire Wildlife Trust Specialist support for Goldberg, E. 2016 Support for notifying the notification of West Pennine site for woodland Moors as a SSSI for features from Natural woodland England’s senior woodland specialist Flowering Vascular plant survey. Jepson, P. 2012 Confirms presence of plants Report to Natural England rare species Alchemilla subcrenata in Walker, K. 2014 Confirms status of Lancashire. Email (Botanical Alchemilla species correspondence Society of Britain & Ireland ) Specialist support for Martin, J.P. 2016 Support for notifying the notification of West Pennine site for vascular plant Moors as a SSSI for vascular features from Natural plants England’s senior vascular plant specialist Birds Belmont Reservoir Gull Martin, S.J. 2011 Records of breeding Survey 2011. Report to gulls on Belmont United Utilities reservoir Belmont Reservoir Gull Martin, S.J. 2012 Records of Breeding Survey 2012 gulls on Belmont reservoir Belmont Reservoir Gull Martin, S.J. 2013 Records of Breeding Survey 2013. Report to gulls on Belmont United Utilities. reservoir Belmont Reservoir Gull Martin, S.J. 2014 Records of Breeding Survey 2014. Report to gulls on Belmont United Utilities. reservoir Page 7 Feature Data Source Author Date Content The state of Lancashire’s White, S. et al., 2013 Tetrad record data for birds: an atlas survey of the breeding birds, available breeding and wintering birds online of Lancashire and North http://www.lacfs.org.uk/L Merseyside, 2007-2011. ancs%20Birds.html Lancashire and Cheshire Fauna Society, Riston BTO national data set BTO 2013 Data regarding the Lower House Plantation Heronry Population Estimates of birds Musgrove et al. 2013 National population in Great Britain and the levels United Kingdom. British Birds 106: 57-102 Supplementary bird Johnson,
Recommended publications
  • Walshaw Moor Withdrawal and Modification of Consent
    South Pennine Moors Site of Special Scientific Interest, West Yorkshire, Lancashire,Greater Manchester, North Yorkshire. (“the SSSI”), South Pennine Moors Special Area of Conservation ("SAC"), South Pennine Moors Special Area of Conservation ("SPA") NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OR MODIFICATION OF CONSENT Section 28E(6) Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended and inserted by section 75 and Schedule 9 of the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000) To: Mr R Bannister Walshaw Moor Estate Ltd Vivary Way Colne Lancashire BB8 9NW Whereas: A. The SSSI was duly notified on 26th September 1994. South Pennine Moors SSSI is a nationally important site as it is the largest area of unenclosed moorland within West Yorkshire and contains the most diverse and extensive examples of upland plant communities in the county. Extensive areas of blanket bog occur on the upland plateaux and are punctuated by species rich acidic flushes and mires. There are also wet and dry heaths and acid grasslands. Three habitat types which occur on the site are rare enough within Europe to be listed on Annex 1 of the EC habitats and Species Directive (92/43) EEC. These communities are typical of and represent the full range of upland vegetation classes found in the South Pennines. This mosaic of habitats supports a moorland breeding bird assemblage which, because of the range of species and number of breeding birds it contains, is of regional and national importance. The large numbers of breeding merlin Falco columbarius, golden plover Pluvialis apricaria and twite Carduelis flavirostris are of international importance. B. The SSSI comprises 164 units of land.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Regulations Assessment of the Rossendale Borough Council Local Plan
    Habitat Regulations Assessment of the Rossendale Borough Council Local Plan Appropriate Assessment July 2018 Habitat Regulations Assessment of the Rossendale Local Plan Appropriate Assessment LC-367 Document Control Box Client Rossendale Borough Council Title HRA Appropriate Assessment of the Rossendale Local Plan Status Final Filename LC-367 Rossendale HRA Appropriate Assessment_3_060718JE.docx Date July, 2018 Author JE Reviewed CW Approved NJD Photo: Twite (Carduelis flavirostris) by Imran Shah About this report & notes for the reader Lepus Consulting Ltd (Lepus) has prepared this No attempt to verify secondary data sources have report for the use of Rossendale Borough Council. been made and they are assumed to be accurate There are a number of limitations which should be as published. borne in mind when considering the results and Every attempt has been made to predict effects as conclusions of this report. No party should alter or accurately as possible using the available change this report without written permission from information. Many effects will depend on the size Lepus. and location of development, building design, ©Lepus Consulting Ltd construction, proximity to sensitive receptors and the range of uses that takes place. The report was This document constitutes a Habitat Regulations prepared April – July 2018 and is subject to, and Assessment Appropriate Assessment of the limited by, the information available during this Regulation 19 Rossendale Local Plan. HRA is a tool time. for predicting potential significant effects. The actual effects may be different from those The report is not intended to be a substitute for identified. Prediction of effects if made using an Environmental Impact Assessment or Strategic evidence based approach and incorporates a Environmental Assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Hra Screening Matrix - 47
    This page is intentionally blank Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent Joint Waste Core Strategy DPD Habitats Regulations Assessment Screening of Draft Issues and Options September 2008 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION - 1 - 1.1. The requirement to Undertake Habitats Regulations Assessment of Development Plans - 2 - 1.2. What are Natura 2000 sites? - 2 - 1.3. Stages of the Habitats Regulations Assessment - 2 - 1.4. Structure of the HRA Screening Report - 4 - 2 STAFFORDSHIRE AND STOKE-ON-TRENT WASTE CORE STRATEGY DPD - 5 - 2.1. Structure of the Waste Core Strategy - 5 - 3 HRA SCREENING METHODOLOGY - 8 - 3.1. Task 1: Identification of Natura 2000 sites which may be affected by the Waste Core Strategy and the factors contributing to and defining the integrity of these sites - 8 - 3.2. Task 2: Description of the Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent Joint Waste Core Strategy DPD - 18 - 3.3. Task 3: Identification of other plans and projects which may have ‘in-combination’ impacts - 18 - 3.4. Task 4: Assessment of ‘likely significant impacts’ of the Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent Joint Waste Core Strategy - 18 - 3.5. Task 5: Preparation of the HRA Screening Report - 19 - 4 ASSUMPTIONS FOR DETERMINING POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON NATURA 2000 SITES - 21 - 4.0. Strategy for screening and impact avoidance - 21 - 4.1. Potential impacts from waste management activities - 21 - 4.2. Screening for likely significant impacts - 27 - 5 OTHER RELEVANT PLANS AND PROJECTS - 31 - 6 SCREENING ASSESSMENT OF THE WASTE CORE STRATEGY - 37 - 6.0. Introduction - 37 - 6.1. Summary of HRA screening findings - 37 - 7 CONCLUSIONS AND NEXT STEPS - 44 - 7.1.
    [Show full text]
  • VISITOR MANAGEMENT PLAN 1.4 Produce
    SCHEDULE OF ACTIONS MATTER 1 (LEGAL AND PROCEDURAL MATTERS) (Action 1.4) VISITOR MANAGEMENT PLAN 1.4 Produce a short note about the Visitor Management Plan, setting out how it will be produced and when. 1 Introduction 1.1 This note has been prepared to provide further information to the Inspectors regarding the Visitor Management Plan for the South Pennine Moors Phase 2 Special Protection Area (SPA) and South Pennine Moors Special Area of Conservation (SAC) referred to in Policy ENV4 (Biodiversity, Geodiversity and Ecological Networks) of the submitted Local Plan. 2 The Visitor Management Plan and the Rossendale Local Plan 2.1 Rossendale’s Local Plan refers to the Visitor Management Plan as the Habitat Regulations Assessment (HRA) is unable to rule out in-combination effects on the SPA/SAC as a result of visitor pressure to the designated area arising from the number of new homes being allocated albeit the Local Plan for Rossendale will not have a significant effect alone. 2.2 Given Rossendale’s commitment to participating in the wider South Pennines Management Plan, the HRA concludes, “It is considered unlikely that the Rossendale Local Plan will lead to adverse effects on site integrity at either the South Pennine Moors SAC or South Pennine Moors Phase 2 SPA in- combination with other plans.” 2.3 The extract from the Local Plan relating to the Visitor Management Plan, taken from the Submission Version of the Local Plan, is set out below. Please note that there have been changes proposed which will be consulted on during the Main Modifications consultation.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment – Thematic Policies and Strategic Sites
    Habitats Regulations Assessment (draft) of the Greater Manchester Spatial Framework Consultation Report – Thematic Policies and Strategic Sites December 2018 3 Prepared by The Greater Manchester Ecology Unit Clarence Arcade Stamford Street Clarence Arcade Ashton-under-Lyne OL6 6DL [email protected] For: GM Combined Authority December 2018 4 [Type text] TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction 2 Brief Description of the Plan 3 Identification of European designated sites concerned 4 The Nature Conservation Interests of the “Screened In” European Sites 5 Initial Screening Opinion – Policies and Strategic Sites 6 Assessment of Impacts and Available Mitigation – Policies 7 Assessment of Impacts and Available Mitigation – Strategic Sites 8 Consideration of ‘In Combination’ Effects with Other Plans and Proposals 9 Overall Conclusions and Recommendations For Further Screening / Appropriate Assessment References APPENDIX 1: Other Plans considered in this Assessment as part of in-combination Assessment HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT OF THE GREATER MANCHESTER SPATIAL FRAMEWORK – THEMATIC POLICIES AND STRATEGIC SITES 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Paragraph 6(3) of the European Habitats Directive dealing with the conservation of European protected sites states that: 6(3).—(1) A competent authority, before deciding to undertake, or give any consent, permission or other authorisation for, a plan or project which— (a) is likely to have a significant effect on a European site or a European offshore marine site (either alone or in combination with other plans or projects), and (b) is not directly connected with or necessary to the management of that site, must make an appropriate assessment of the implications of the plan or project for that site in view of that site’s conservation objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is a Boggart Hole?1 Simon Young ISI, Florence (Italy)
    What is a Boggart Hole?1 Simon Young ISI, Florence (Italy) INTRODUCTION The boggart—a word of uncertain origins (OED, ‘Boggard, -art’; Nodal and Milner 1875, 126; Wright 1898–1905, I, 326)—was once a much feared bogey in the midlands and the north of England. By the nineteenth century it had come to be associated, above all, with what might be called a ‘greater Lancashire’: the County Palatine, the south Pennines and the northern fringes of Cheshire and Derbyshire. Relative to the amount of writing that survives, most of it from the 1800s and much in Lancashire dialect, the boggart is perhaps Britain’s most understudied supernatural creature. This is true of the nineteenth century (Thornber 1837, 38, 99–104 and 329–34; Harland and Wilkinson 1867, 49–62; 1873, 10–12 and 141– 42; Hardwick 1872, 124–42; Bowker 1883, 27–36, 52–58, 63–72, 77–82, 131–39, 152–58, 174–88, 212–20 and 238–42; McKay 1888), and of recent years (Billingsley 2007, 69–74; Turner-Bishop 2010; Roberts 2013, 95–105; Young 2014b). Boggart place-names have particularly been neglected. In fact, there is, to the best of the present writer’s knowledge, no study of boggart toponyms, despite the existence of tens of boggart place-names, many still in use today.2 1 I would like to thank John Billingsley, David Boardman, Ffion Dash, Anna Garrett, Richard Green, Denise Jagger, Stephen Lees, Wendy Lord, Eileen Ormand and the anonymous reviewer for help with the writing and with the improvement of this article.
    [Show full text]
  • Authority Monitoring Report 6
    Monitoring Report Part of the Blackburn with Darwen Local Development Framework 6 December 2010 Blackburn with Darwen Annual Monitoring Report 6 – 2009-2010 PLANNING ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT December 2010 Blackburn with Darwen Annual Monitoring Report 6 – 2009-2010 CONTENTS PAGE Executive Summary 2 1. Introduction 3 2. Local Development Scheme: Milestones 4 3. An Introduction to Blackburn with Darwen 6 4. Economy 10 5. Housing 17 6. Protecting and enhancing the environment 27 7. Quality of place 34 8. Access to jobs and services 38 9. Monitoring the Borough’s Supplementary Planning Documents 50 10. References 59 11. Glossary 60 Appendix I: Development on Allocated Town Centre Sites 63 Appendix II: Priority Habitats and Species 65 Appendix III: Policies to be retained/superseded from the Blackburn with Darwen Borough Local Plan 66 1 Blackburn with Darwen Annual Monitoring Report 6 – 2009-2010 Executive Summary This is the sixth Annual Monitoring Report for Blackburn with Darwen and includes monitoring information covering the period 1st April 2009 - 31st March 2010. The Local Development Framework, which will eventually replace the current adopted Local Plan is still in the development stage and as a result there are areas where monitoring of this is not possible. The report is, however, as comprehensive as is possible at this point and provides a ‘snap- shot’ of the borough. The monitoring has been completed using a set of indicators – Contextual, Core Output, Local Output and Significant Effect indicators. The Core Output Indicators used in the monitoring report are those set by Government and will ensure consistent monitoring data is produced each year.
    [Show full text]
  • Ramblers Gems a Spring Vale Rambling Class Publication
    Ramblers Gems A Spring Vale Rambling Class Publication Volume 1, Issue 22 3rd October 2020 For further information or to submit a contribution email: [email protected] Web Site http://www.springvaleramblers.co.uk/ One such example, named ‘Limersgate’ traversed from I N S I D E T H I S I SSUE Haslingden Grane into the Darwen valley, over to Tockholes and on towards Preston. The trail entered 1 A Local Packhorse Trail Darwen at Pickup Bank Heights, and down into Hoddlesden via Long Hey Lane, past Holker House 2 Wordsearch (1591), and over Heys Lane, crossing Roman Road. It 3 Walking in South Lakeland then dropped down Pole Lane to Sough, crossing the River Darwen by a ford at Clough, and climbing to pass 4 Alum Scar White Hall (1557). The trail then dropped into Print 5 Harriers and Falcons Shop crossing Bury Fold and past Kebbs Cottage to Radfield Head, thence into the wooded valley that became Bold Venture Park. A Local Packhorse Trail In the 16th-18th centuries, Darwen was at the crossroads of several packhorse trails that crisscrossed the region. These were narrow, steep and winding, being totally unsuitable for wheeled traffic. Much earlier, the Roman XX (20th) Legion had built a road from Manchester to Ribchester and onward to The Old Bridge at Cadshaw Hadrian’s Wall. However, due to frequent marauding The carters and carriers who oversaw the packhorses attacks by local brigands they constructed few East to and mules, overnighted in Inns at strategic distances West roads. The packhorse trails were developed to enable trains of packhorses and mules, sometimes as along the trails.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Report
    Monitoring Report Part of the Blackburn with Darwen Local Development Framework 4 December 2008 Blackburn with Darwen Annual Monitoring Report 4 – 2007-2008 PLANNING ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT December 2008 Blackburn with Darwen Annual Monitoring Report 4 – 2007-2008 CONTENTS PAGE Executive Summary 3 1. Introduction 4 2. Local Development Scheme: Milestones 6 3. An Introduction to Blackburn with Darwen 8 Population 8 Ethnicity 8 Deprivation 8 Education 10 SWOT Analysis of Borough 10 4. Economy 12 Worklessness 12 Unemployment 12 Socio-Economic Profile 12 Weekly Earnings 13 COI: Total Amount of Additional Floorspace – by Type 13 COI: Total Amount of Employment Floorspace on PDL 13 COI: Employment Land Available 14 COI: Total Amount of Floorspace for ‘Town Centre Uses’ 15 LOI: Protection and Reuse of Employment Sites 15 5. Housing 18 Council Tax Bandings 18 Household Composition 18 Housing Fitness 19 Quality of residential “offer” 20 COI: Plan Period and Housing Targets 20 COI: Net Additional Dwellings – in previous years 21 COI: Net Additional Dwellings – for the reporting year 21 COI: Net Additional Dwellings – in future years 21 COI: Managed Delivery Target 22 COI: % of New and Converted Dwellings on PDL 23 COI: Net Additional Pitches (Gypsy & Traveller) 23 COI: Gross Affordable Housing Completions 23 LOI: Density of Housing Development 24 6. Accessibility and Transport 28 Infrastructure 28 Car Ownership 28 Modal Choice 28 Accessibility 29 LOI: % new residential development within 30 mins public transport 29 time of a GP, hospital, primary and secondary school, employment and a major retail centre 7. Town Centres and Retailing 34 Retailing Survey 34 Retail Change 35 LOI: Amount of completed Retail, Office and Leisure Development Page 1 Blackburn with Darwen Annual Monitoring Report 4 – 2007-2008 Respectively 35 8.
    [Show full text]
  • First Ascents List Lancashire Rock
    2 / First Ascents First Ascents / 3 FIRST ASCENTS LIST LANCASHIRE ROCK Lancashire Rock First Ascents Lancashire Rock First Ascents Introduction This document is an online resource to its companion BMC guidebook, Lancashire Rock. It gives all first ascent details Although the first climbs in Lancashire were described by list is a reasonably accurate record of the first claimed for the routes contained in that book. Laycock in 1913, which gives a timeline for some of the ascents. So apologies to anyone who sees someone else’s early climbing, by the early sixties there was still relatively name against a climb they did earlier, but if you do have The decision was made to produce this information as a separate, freely-downloadable document in order to save space little information about the routes themselves and even an earlier claim, if routes you did are not attributed, or if in the face of ever-increasing numbers of routes and more space being devoted to larger topos and photos. less about the climbing history. At that time, small groups you can supply any more details, please get in touch. of climbers were exploring their nearby gritstone quar- It is also hoped that this can allow first ascent information, a notoriously changable series of “facts”, to be more dynamic ries, but this was very informal and low key. The climbs and updatable as new information comes along. they did were often not named, and even if they were, it Format of First Ascent Lists was not considered necessary to record any descriptions, The guidebook can be purchased from the BMC, www.thebmc.co.uk/shop.
    [Show full text]
  • 01629 816581 Or [email protected]
    Mapping at a landscape-scale The challenge of working across the multiple boundaries in the South Pennines Special Area for Conservation Moors for the Future Partnership works across the South Pennines Special Area for Conservation, across multiple boundaries that include: 1 Special Area for Conservation 1 National Park Authority Area 4 Natural Character Areas 3 Environment Agency Water Areas 11 Drinking Water Safeguard Zones 88 River Waterbody Catchments 51 Local Authorities 249 Environmental Stewardship Scheme Agreements 779 Sites of Special Scientific Interest Mapping these boundaries is only the start of the process. The boundaries represent some of the different interests in the landholdings and the permissions that need to be sought from the different bodies before conservation and science works can take place. Some more figures about these boundaries Vast areas of bare peat will be revegetated The South Pennine Moors SAC: 648.2 Km2 Natural Character Areas: South West Peak, Dark Peak, Southern Pennines and Derbyshire Peak Fringe and Lower Derwent. Environment Agency: North West, North East and Midlands Drinking Water Safeguard Zones: these are areas of interest to Seven Trent Water, United Utilities and Yorkshire Water. The 88 River Waterbody Catchments include the following Catchments: Aire and Calder Derwent Derbyshire Don and Rother Dove Ribble Upper Mersey Weaver and Gowy Wharfe and Lower Ouse Local Authority: Our working area is close to 3 major surrounding populations in the cities of Manchester, Leeds and Sheffield. Contact us: www.moorsforthefuture.org.uk T: 01629 816581 or [email protected] @moorsforfuture Moors for the Future A Moors for the Future Partnership project in the EU designated South Pennine Moors Special Area of Conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Lancashire: a Chronology of Flash Flooding
    LANCASHIRE: A CHRONOLOGY OF FLASH FLOODING Introduction The past focus on the history of flooding has been mainly with respect to flooding from the overflow of rivers and with respect to the peak level that these floods have achieved. The Chronology of British Hydrological Events provides a reasonably comprehensive record of such events throughout Great Britain. Over the last 60 years the river gauging network provides a detailed record of the occurrence of river flows and peak levels and flows are summaried in HiflowsUK. However there has been recent recognition that much flooding of property occurs from surface water flooding, often far from rivers. Locally intense rainfall causes severe flooding of property and land as water concentrates and finds pathways along roads and depressions in the landscape. In addition, intense rainfall can also cause rapid rise in level and discharge in rivers causing a danger to the public even though the associated peak level is not critical. In extreme cases rapid rise in river level may be manifested as a ‘wall of water’ with near instantaneous rise in level of a metre or more. Such events are usually convective and may be accompanied by destructive hail or cause severe erosion of hillsides and agricultural land. There have been no previous compilations of historical records of such ‘flash floods’or even of more recent occurrences. It is therefore difficult to judge whether a recent event is unusual or even unique in terms of the level reached at a particular location or more broadly of regional severity. This chronology of flash floods is provided in order to enable comparisons to be made between recent and historical floods, to judge rarity and from a practical point of view to assess the adequacy of urban drainage networks.
    [Show full text]