The Foundation Fit Is One of These “Underground'' Manu

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Foundation Fit Is One of These “Underground'' Manu 1833889 Platonov Foundation pit POCKET REMOVE FROM NOT DO CAROS LIBRARY ALLEN MO. -=ORT WAYNE AND / ALLEh PUBLIC LIBRARY 3 1833 00641 6728 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2017 with funding from Kahle/Austin Foundation https://archive.org/details/foundationpitOOplat Much as Herman Melville’s greatness was discovered long after his death, Andrey Platonov's reputation has been growing since the posthumous publica- tion of a small collection of his stories in 1958. Despite the Soviet authorities' refusal to publish his more experimental and critical works, the extensive under- ground circulation of his manuscripts has established his right to be considered one of the foremost writers in Russian of this century. The Foundation Fit is one of these “underground'' manu- scripts. Set in a small town in early post- Revolutionary Russia, it describes a group of workmen and low-level bu- reaucrats engaged in digging the foun- dation pit for what is to become a grand, central structure to house all the town's inhabitants. But, asks Voschev, the dreamer, “Don't people decrease in their sense of life when buildings in- crease? Man will make a building and unmake himself. W ho will live in it then?” Mirra Ginsburg writes in the Intro- duction: “(He) creates a surrealist landscape— a landscape of myth or nightmare. Every man becomes Everyman, . and the novel assumes a larger than life, almost legendary qual- ity.” And Professor Victor Erlich of Yale comments: “Platonov is an impor- tant and a remarkable writer. His brand of humanism is unique and moving. His prose is deliberately and effectively in- congruous. It takes a translator of Mirra Ginsburg's skill to render this quality into equally effective English.” By Audrey Platonov The Fierce and Beautiful World The Foundation Pit The Foundation Pit Andreu Platonov Translated by Mirra Ginsburg E. P. DUTTON & CO., INC. NEW YORK 1975 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING IN PUBLICATION DATA Platonov, Andrei Platonovich, 1899-1951. The foundation pit. Translation of Kotlovan. I. Title. PZ3.P6953F06 [PG3476.P543] 891.7'3'42 73-122788 Copyright © 1968 by Alex Flegon English translation Copyright © 1975 by E. P. Dutton & Co., Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. First Edition 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system now known or to be invented, without permission in writing from the publisher, except by a reviewer who wishes to quote brief passages in connection with a review written for inclusion in a magazine, newspaper or broadcast. Published simultaneously in Canada by Clarke, Irwin & Company Limited, Toronto and Vancouver ISBN: 0-525-10775-4 Designed by Dorothea von Elbe 183388 Translator’s Introduction “Beauty,” wrote Platonov, “does not exist separately, by itself. It is the property of all . beauty is all days, and all things.” He also wrote, “We grow out of the earth, out of all its impurities, and everything that is on earth is also in us.” Andrey Platonov, a unique and extraordinary writer, came into Russian literature in the 1920s, at a time when it abounded in unique and extraordinary talents. Like the others in that brilliant array—Zamyatin, Bulgakov, Babel, Pilnyak, Olesha, Zoshchenko, all of them silenced or de- stroyed at the height of their powers—he became a victim of his time, one more example of the vicissitudes of litera- ture under dictatorship. Yet his fate, like his talent and his origins, followed a pattern of its own. Less spectacular than the others, less flashing, more muted, he was also less European, less worldly, more Rus- sian. His origins were not in a cosmopolitan and intellec- tual middle-class milieu, but in a world of urban working people, of artisans just recently emerged from the peas- antry. The locale of most of his stories was his native province of Voronezh, in the black earth belt some two hundred miles south of Moscow, where he was born in 1899, the eldest son of a railway mechanic. At the age of fifteen, Platonov went to work to help his father support what was by then a family of ten. He worked in many places at many trades. Nevertheless, after the revolution and service in the Red Army, he continued his schooling and graduated in 1924 from the Voronezh Polytechnical Institute with a de- gree in electrical engineering. From 1923 to 1926 he worked in the field of electrification and land reclamation in various provinces in central Russia. Here he became thoroughly familiar with the devastated postrevolutionary village and the peasants—their life, their attitudes, their speech. Throughout these years he contributed poems, stories, and articles to a number of local newspapers. In 1927 he went to Moscow and devoted himself entirely to literary work. A late arrival, he missed much of the brilliant and varied flowering of early Soviet literature. He came in time to witness the beginning of its ruthless extermina- tion. The RAPP (Russian Association of Proletarian Writ- ers) and its notorious leader Leopold Averbakh were just about to be entrusted with the destruction of everything original and alive, and very soon Platonov himself became their target. For a short time, Platonov joined the Pereval group, which consisted of peasant and working class writers, as well as fellow travelers, and advocated service to the revo- lution while preserving the earlier cultural and literary values and creative freedom. On the whole, however, he never became “acculturated” in the literary world of the capital, but remained a solitary figure, going his own way —in his subject matter, his characters, his language, his style, his own brand of irony, his own humor, and his own sadness. His work did not fit into any “mainstream.” And, al- though he was a Communist, his communism was closer to early Christianity than to the brutal state religion that was being forcibly imposed on Russia. Under attack almost from the very first, he was accused of a bevy of sins: pessimism, anarchism, nihilism, anti- vi realism, symbolism, petty-bourgeois and kulak psychology, failure to understand the larger purposes of Communist construction which justified the sacrifice of the individual, hostile mockery of the revolution, and even Trotskyist deviations. Barred from book publication for long periods, he was reduced to virtual non-being as a writer through most of his lifetime, earning a bare living as a book reviewer writ- ing under several pen names. The stretches of enforced silence as an artist were punctuated by the occasional ap- pearance of a story in a magazine or a slender collection, usually followed by renewed outbursts from party critics. Between 1929 and 1943, only one small collection appeared. Indeed, except for the periods when he was subject to in- tense vilification, his name and his work were almost un- known to Russian readers. Despite the hostile atmosphere, Platonov continued writing in his own manner, which obstinately refused to fit into the requisite forms and requisite moods. He remained a Communist, but he held up his early Communist vision —the vision expressed in the simplest terms by many of his characters—to the realities of the time, and clearly found them wanting. The satirical vein in his writing manifested itself most strongly in the late 1920s and early 1930s. In the story “Doubting Makar,” published in 1929 in the magazine Oktyabr Platonov’s hero falls asleep, “and his , suffering passed into a dream: in the dream he saw a moun- tain or some elevation, and on the mountain stood a man of science . the man stood silently, without seeing the grieving Makar and thinking only about the general scale of things, not about the private Makar. The face of that most learned man was lit by the glow of faraway mass life spreading in the distance beneath him, and his eyes were terrible and dead from being on such a height and looking too far.” The story provoked a vitriolic reply by Averbakh, re- plete with charges of antisocial individualism, anti-collec- Vll — tivism, pseudo-humanism, nihilism, kulak deviations and anarchic hostility to the Soviet state. After the publication of another satire, “Vprok,” in Kras- naya Nov in 1931, Platonov was arrested and expelled for a time from Moscow. In 1934, the Literary Encyclopedia wrote that Platonov showed “the Soviet state apparatus not as a form of the participation of workers and peasants in governing the country, but as a mechanical apparatus of coercion, of the leveling down of the individual. Objectively, Platonov’s story [“Doubting Makar’’ tr.] reinforced the Trotskyist attack on the party and on proletarian dictatorship.’’ The appearance of a small collection, The Potudan River , in 1937, was met with the usual criticism, this time for Platonov’s “obsession with suffering’’ when the country needed “positive and optimistic works.’’ Miraculously, Platonov escaped prosecution during the purges of the 1930s, but in 1938 his only son, a boy of fifteen, was arrested and sent to a concentration camp. All efforts to obtain the boy’s release were unavailing. In 1940 he came home, dying of tuberculosis. Platonov nursed him through his final illness, contracting the disease himself. During World War II, he volunteered to serve as a war correspondent. He reported from various fronts and pub- lished a number of stories, dealing chiefly with the war and later issued in two collections. Postwar publication of the warm and tender story “Homecoming” in Novy Mir (1946), which was, incredibly, attacked for “maligning” the Soviet soldier, marked the virtual end of Platonov as a writer.
Recommended publications
  • Tolstoy, Khlebnikov, Platonov and the Fragile Absolute of Russian Modernity
    Three Easy Pieces: Tolstoy, Khlebnikov, Platonov and the Fragile Absolute of Russian Modernity The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:37945016 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Three Easy Pieces: Tolstoy, Khlebnikov, Platonov and the Fragile Absolute of Russian Modernity A dissertation presented by Alexandre Gontchar to The Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Slavic Languages and Literatures Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts January 2017 ©2017– Alexandre Gontchar All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisor: William M. Todd Alexandre Gontchar Three Easy Pieces: Tolstoy, Khlebnikov, Platonov and the Fragile Absolute of Russian Modernity Abstract This dissertation shows how three Russian authors estranged and challenged the notion of human freedom as self-determination—the idea that meaningful self-authorship is possible in view of the finitude that every human being embodies under different aspects of his existence, such as the individual and collective awareness of the inevitability of death, as well as the narrative inclusion of any existential project within multiple contexts of history, culture, and language, all of which are always given already. At first glance to be free is to transcend these multiple limits.
    [Show full text]
  • Platonov and the Soviet Natural World in the 1930S Carly Tozian Faculty Advisor
    Tozian 1 Challenging Stalinist Exploitation: Platonov and the Soviet Natural World in the 1930s Carly Tozian Faculty Advisor: Professor James Goodwin Honors Thesis in Russian Studies 20 April 2021 Tozian 2 Introduction The 1920s and 1930s were not a time of literary liberty in the Soviet Union, nor were they a time for environmental protection. Under Stalin, the literary world and the natural world suffered similar prescriptions of exploitation. Stalin implemented policies such as the First Five Year Plan and the Belomor canal project which had detrimental effects upon the natural landscape. These plans were tailored for political and economic gain, no matter the cost of human or other life. In the literary sphere, writers were published only if they agreed to represent the progression of society into the ideal socialist world by adhering to the genre of Socialist Realism. For this reason, many works from well-known writers remained unpublished from the beginning of the1930s until Stalin’s death in 1953, chief among them, Andrei Platonov. Those of his works that were not published in his lifetime include The Foundation Pit, his short novel “The Juvenile Sea,” as well as other film scripts and plays. His novella “For Future Use” was published, but immediately received harsh criticism from other writers and even from Stalin (Pit 156-7). Through his unique style, Platonov “documented” the experiences he witnessed during the time of the First Five Year plan and the implementation of other Stalinist policies throughout his fictional works. I argue that Platonov fashions his own “real” socialist realist method in contrast to the prescribed one, which was committed to the party line.
    [Show full text]
  • A Companion to Andrei Platonov's the Foundation
    A Companion to Andrei Platonov’s The Foundation Pit Studies in Russian and Slavic Literatures, Cultures and History Series Editor: Lazar Fleishman A Companion to Andrei Platonov’s The Foundation Pit Thomas Seifrid University of Southern California Boston 2009 Copyright © 2009 Academic Studies Press All rights reserved ISBN 978-1-934843-57-4 Book design by Ivan Grave Published by Academic Studies Press in 2009 28 Montfern Avenue Brighton, MA 02135, USA [email protected] www.academicstudiespress.com iv Effective December 12th, 2017, this book will be subject to a CC-BY-NC license. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. Other than as provided by these licenses, no part of this book may be reproduced, transmitted, or displayed by any electronic or mechanical means without permission from the publisher or as permitted by law. The open access publication of this volume is made possible by: This open access publication is part of a project supported by The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Humanities Open Book initiative, which includes the open access release of several Academic Studies Press volumes. To view more titles available as free ebooks and to learn more about this project, please visit borderlinesfoundation.org/open. Published by Academic Studies Press 28 Montfern Avenue Brighton, MA 02135, USA [email protected] www.academicstudiespress.com CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE Platonov’s Life . 1 CHAPTER TWO Intellectual Influences on Platonov . 33 CHAPTER THREE The Literary Context of The Foundation Pit . 59 CHAPTER FOUR The Political Context of The Foundation Pit . 81 CHAPTER FIVE The Foundation Pit Itself .
    [Show full text]
  • Fifty Works of Fiction Libertarians Should Read
    Liberty, Art, & Culture Vol. 30, No. 3 Spring 2012 Fifty works of fiction libertarians should read By Anders Monsen Everybody compiles lists. These usually are of the “top 10” Poul Anderson — The Star Fox (1965) kind. I started compiling a personal list of individualist titles in An oft-forgot book by the prolific and libertarian-minded the early 1990s. When author China Miéville published one Poul Anderson, a recipient of multiple awards from the Lib- entitled “Fifty Fantasy & Science Fiction Works That Social- ertarian Futurist Society. This space adventure deals with war ists Should Read” in 2001, I started the following list along and appeasement. the same lines, but a different focus. Miéville and I have in common some titles and authors, but our reasons for picking Margaret Atwood—The Handmaid’s Tale (1986) these books probably differ greatly. A dystopian tale of women being oppressed by men, while Some rules guiding me while compiling this list included: being aided by other women. This book is similar to Sinclair 1) no multiple books by the same writer; 2) the winners of the Lewis’s It Can’t Happen Here or Robert Heinlein’s story “If This Prometheus Award do not automatically qualify; and, 3) there Goes On—,” about the rise of a religious-type theocracy in is no limit in terms of publication date. Not all of the listed America. works are true sf. The first qualification was the hardest, and I worked around this by mentioning other notable books in the Alfred Bester—The Stars My Destination (1956) brief notes.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Soul by Andrei Platonov Andrei Platonov: the Genius Who Supported Communism but Mocked the Soviet System
    Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Soul by Andrei Platonov Andrei Platonov: The genius who supported communism but mocked the Soviet system. Nobel Prize-winning poet Joseph Brodsky described Platonov as an “outstanding writer of our time”, and one of the major figures of 20th century literature, placing the blue-chip Soviet author alongside Marcel Proust, Franz Kafka, Robert Musil, William Faulkner and Samuel Beckett. But here is the thing, Platonov was someone who supported the Bolshevik Revolution and joined the Communist Party while his multi-layered, richly detailed books showed no mercy, exposing the totalitarian society built around a lie. Platonov’s characters buried themselves in communism but found no relief. Early career. The son of a railway worker was born in the town of Voronezh in 1899. Platonov was originally Andrei Klimentov. He created his pen name in 1920 to pay homage to his father, Platon Klimentov, who had some inventions to his credit. The oldest in a family of eleven children, Andrei took his first job as an errand-boy. He was 13. Around that age, he also began writing poetry. Following in his father’s footsteps, the teen worked as an engineer’s assistant for the South-Eastern railway, a symbol of Soviet industrial might at the time. One of Platonov’s most recurrent images, pointing metaphorically toward the theme of revolution and utopia, became that of the train or locomotive. Andrei Platonov, 1925. Like many other young people of his generation, Platonov welcomed the Revolution of October 1917 with palpable enthusiasm. When the Civil War broke out, he was a locomotive driver assistant on trains delivering ammunition to the Red Army.
    [Show full text]
  • The Novel at Work
    THE NOVEL AT WORK REFLECTIONS ON ART AND POLITICS IN SELECTED COUNTER-TOTALITARIAN NOVELS, 1920-70 Patricia Harris This thesis is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Murdoch University For books are not absolutely dead things, but do contain a potency of life in them to be as active as that soul was whose progeny they are; nay, they do preserve as in a vial the purest efficacy and extraction of that living intellect that bred them … Who kills a man kills a reasonable creature, God’s image; but he who destroys a good book, kills reason itself, kills the image of God, as it were in the eye. (John Milton, Areopagitica, 1644) I declare that this thesis is my own account of my own research. It contains as its main content work that has not previously been submitted for a degree at any university. Patricia Harris Acknowledgements Words fail when you most want them to succeed, and this is no exception. So my following attempts to express my gratitude for the wisdom, support and friendship of those who have assisted me through this thesis remain paltry and inadequate. May I first acknowledge the extraordinary skills and support of my supervisory team. To Professor Helena Grehan, my principal supervisor, thank you many times over for the care and patience with which you have watched over this project; your willingness to read draft after draft of half-finished work; your acute yet sympathetic readings of my arguments; and your willingness to be there in total, when fits of anxiety threatened to throw me off course.
    [Show full text]
  • V. Makarov A. Guseynov A. Grigoryev
    ss3-2012:Ss4-2009.qxd 06.08.2012 21:52 Страница 252 E D I T O R I A L C O U N C I L V. MAKAROV A. GUSEYNOV Chairman Editor-in-Chief Academician of RAS Academician of RAS A. GRIGORYEV Deputy Editor-in-Chief M E M B E R S O F T H E C O U N C I L L. ABALKIN, Academician V. STEPIN, Academician A. DEREVYANKO, Academician V. TISHKOV, Academician T. ZASLAVSKAYA, Academician Zh. TOSHCHENKO, Corr. Mem., RAS V. LEKTORSKY, Academician A. DMITRIYEV, Corr. Mem., RAS A. NEKIPELOV, Academician I. BORISOVA, Executive Secretary G. OSIPOV, Academician Managing Editor: Oleg Levin; Production Manager: Len Hoffman SOCIAL SCIENCES (ISSN 0134-5486) is a quarterly publication of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS). The articles selected by the Editorial Council are chosen from books and journals originally prepared in the Russian language by authors from 30 institutes of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Statements of fact and opinion appearing in the journal are made on the responsibility of the authors alone and do not imply the endorsement of the Editorial Council. Reprint permission: Editorial Council. Address: 26, Maronovsky pereulok, Moscow, 119991 GSP-1, Russia. SOCIAL SCIENCES (ISSN 0134-5486) is published quarterly by East View Information Services: 10601 Wayzata Blvd., Minneapolis, MN 55305, USA. Vol. 43, No.3, 2012. Postmaster: Send address changes to East View Information Services: 10601 Wayzata Blvd., Minneapolis, MN 55305, USA. Orders are accepted by East View Information Services. Phone: (952) 252-1201; Toll-free: (800) 477-1005; Fax: (952) 252-1201; E-mail: [email protected] as well as by all major subscription agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Platonov's Life
    Platonov’s Life Chapter 1 Platonov’s Life 1 For someone justly considered one of the major figures of twentieth- century literature, Platonov left behind a surprisingly meager collec- tion of written or other materials from which his biography can be reconstructed. The paucity of biographical materials in his case is mostly a legacy of the Stalin period of Soviet history in which he lived most of his life, when private documents could be turned into incriminating evidence in the event of a search by the agents of the NKVD (the Stalinist secret police). But even against this background the material is sparse. Platonov kept a series of notebooks in which he wrote down ideas for literary works and technical inventions, and these have been published in recent years; but they reveal almost nothing of his private life and even relatively little about the composition of his literary works. He is not known to have kept a diary, though many of his contemporaries did, sometimes prolifically (see, for example, those collected in Garros, et al., Intimacy and Terror. Soviet Diaries of the 1930s and those discussed in Hellbeck, Revolution on My Mind. Writing a Diary under Stalin). Some letters by and to him have survived and been published, but not very many. Reminiscences by some of his acquaintances have also been published, but few of their authors seems to have known Platonov particularly closely—or, since some of these reminiscences were published in the Soviet era, to have been willing to say much about Platonov’s views. At various times from the 1920s–1940s Platonov filled out questionnaires for one or another journal or literary organization, but the information in them is sometimes contradictory and we lack even a full account of his non-literary employment for various land-reclamation agencies in the 1920s and 1930s.
    [Show full text]
  • Art and Protest in Putin's Russia
    Art and Protest in Putin’s Russia The Pussy Riot protest and the subsequent heavy-handed treatment of the protes- tors grabbed headlines, but this was not an isolated instance of art being noticeably critical of the regime. As this book, based on extensive original research, shows, there has been gradually emerging over recent decades a signifi cant counter- culture in the art world which satirises and ridicules the regime and the values it represents, at the same time putting forward, through art, alternative values. The book traces the development of art and protest in recent decades, discusses how art of this kind engages in political and social protest, and provides many illustrations as examples of art as protest. The book concludes by discussing how important art has been in facilitating new social values and in prompting political protests. Lena Jonson is Senior Research Fellow and Head of the Russia Research Program at the Swedish Institute of International Affairs, Stockholm. Routledge Contemporary Russia and Eastern Europe Series 1 Liberal Nationalism in Central 8 The Development of Capitalism Europe in Russia Stefan Auer Simon Clarke 2 Civil-Military Relations in 9 Russian Television Today Russia and Eastern Europe Primetime drama and comedy David J. Betz David MacFadyen 3 The Extreme Nationalist Threat 10 The Rebuilding of Greater in Russia Russia The growing influence of Putin’s foreign policy towards the Western Rightist ideas CIS countries Thomas Parland Bertil Nygren 4 Economic Development in 11 A Russian Factory Enters
    [Show full text]
  • Lasha Matiashvili in a Rich and Idiosyncratic Literary Tradition of The
    Brolly. Journal of Social Sciences 4 (1) 2021 ANDREY PLATONOV AND THE BIOPOLITICS OF FAILED COMMUNISM Lasha Matiashvili Associate Professor, Free University of Tbilisi, Georgia [email protected] Abstract. In what follows, I will interpret the works of post-revolutionary Russian writer Andrey Platonov through the lenses of critical theory and assume that there is a certain biopolitical element in his literature. Platonov’s fictional characters represent the "creaturely dimension" of "bare life" constructed by the Soviet governmental machine. They experience a shattering sense of longing for lost revolutionary ideals and manifest some kind of existential alert to the upcoming total colonization of private, as well as social life. What do the notions of "bare life" and "creaturely life" mean and how are these concepts interrelated? To what extent one can apply them to interpret the works of Andrey Platonov? "Bare life" is the conceptual construction, meaning an extra-juridical dimension of existence, produced by sovereign decision. It represents the zero degrees of life without a legal and political framework, where excluded subjects are, like other creatures, living in a natural environment under the constant sense of ontological insecurity. Platonov’s literary experiments are not mimetic reflections of reality. Apart from purely existential themes, his texts are imbued with the nihilistic atmosphere of Soviet social and political order and manifest the real and symbolic structure of power. Keywords: power, soviet literature, foundation pit, biopolitics, Platonov I. POOR CREATURES OF THE SOVIET POWER In a rich and idiosyncratic literary tradition of the totalitarian twentieth century, the Soviet government silenced many authors; among them was Andrey Platonov, whose main texts saw the daylight in Russian only during the period of Perestroika.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foundation Pit Itself
    Chapter 5 The Foundation Pit Itself A note on Platonov’s title: because the word “pit” in some English translations of the Bible appears as a synonym for hell or the underworld (see, for example, Psalms 16:10 and 49:9), the English title The Foundation Pit has a more ominous ring to it than does the original Russian, Kotlovan. Because it is part of the vocabularly of building, the word “kotlovan” has a more prospective ring to it. It denotes the pit or hole in which the foundation for a building is to be laid—and certainly motifs of the pit and the grave come into play in Platonov’s tale—but something like “The Building Site” would capture more of its at least provisional air of optimism. THE GENERIC CONTEXT OF PLATONOV’S TALE: THE ‘PRODUCTION NOVEL’ The events Platonov portrays in The Foundation Pit involving the excavation of a foundation pit as part of a plan to construct a “proletarian home” and the formation of a collective farm in the nearby countryside patently mimic the structure and thematic concerns of a type of novel that had become increasingly prominent in Soviet literature over the course of the 1920s: the “production” novel, whose staple theme was industrialization, which it typically represented as efforts of one kind or another to restart a factory idled by the civil war, to increase production dramatically within an existing factory, or heroically to create a vast new factory complex from scratch—all always as part of an effort to meet or 105 Chapter Five still better to exceed the Party’s economic plans (after 1928, the Five-Year Plan).
    [Show full text]
  • Western Canon
    Western Canon “If we read the Western Canon in order to form our social, political, or personal moral values, I firmly believe we will become monsters of selfishness and exploitation. To read in the service of any ideology is not, in my judgment, to read at all. The reception of aesthetic power enables us to learn how to talk to ourselves and how to endure ourselves. The true use of Shakespeare or of Cervantes, of Homer or of Dante, of Chaucer or of Rabelais, is to augment one’s own growing inner self. Reading deeply in the Canon will not make one a better or worse person, a more useful or more harmful citizen. All that the Western Canon can bring one is the proper use of one’s own solitude, that solitude whose final form is one’s confrontation with one’s own mortality.” − The Western Canon: The Books and School of the Ages, Harold Bloom The School of Resentment The late Harold Bloom (1930-2019), Professor of Humanities, Yale University, coined the term "The Schools of Resentment" (TSOR) in the 1970s to describe those who are preoccupied with political social activism and social change at the expense of aesthetic values. According to Bloom TSOR is associated with Marxist critical theory, including African American studies, Marxist literary criticism, New Historicist criticism, feminist criticism, and poststructuralism — specifically as promoted by Jacques Lacan (1901-1981), Jacques Derrida (1930-2004) and Michel Foucault (1926-1984). Bloom contends that TSOR threatens the nature of the canon itself and may lead to its eventual demise.
    [Show full text]