DOCSLIB.ORG

The Distribution and Ecology of the Freshwater

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE DISTRIBUTION AND ECOLOGY OF THE FRESHWATER MOLLUSCS OF NORTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA by Jacqueline S. Lee B.Sc., Simon Fraser University, 1 98 1 THESIS SüBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE in BIOLOGY O Jacqueline S. Lee THE UNIVERSI'W OF NORTHERN BRITISH COLUMBiA Apil2ooo AU ri@ reserved. This work may not be rcproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or oula means, without the permission of the author. The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence ailowing the exclusive permettant la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationaie du Canada de reproduce, loan, distri'bute or sel reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/nlm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format 6lectronique. The author retainw ownenhtp of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette &&se. thesis nor substantial extracts fkom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced *out the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. ABSTRACT Molluscs (i.e., snails, clams and mussels) are cornmon inhabitants of fteshwater habitats in norihan British Columbia (north of approximately 54W), yet little work has been done on these animals in this area. A large-sale study recorded 55 taxa of fnshwater molluscs in aorthem BC comprising 32 snail, 2 mussel and 21 clam taxa. Some of the factors that apped to affect the distribution of these molluscs were climate, dispersal barriers, glacial history and water chemistry. Cornparisons of mollusc oommunity structure were made between historic and contempomy collections to monitor habitat change ova tirne. Diversity was generally found to be higher in contemporary collections, likely due to sampling bias, or incomplete processing and archiving of histonc collections. This emphasizes the need for stsndatdized collection and processing techniques in order to sustain consavation efforts. A small-sale study was undden in the Lower Torpy River watershed to assess the effects of forest practices on fieshwata mollusc habitat. Lentic (standing water) habitats haà similar clam densities (Pisidium carertanum), water oonditions and mollusc community stnictun whaher nahiral or createù by forest pnctices (e.g., rosd building). The case was sirniiar for lotic (fiowing water) habitats, alihough lotic and lentic habitats were signifimtly diffèrent in several ways. Lentic habitats had higher densities of clams, higher water ternpcrahirrs, lower dissolved oxygen levels end lower pH. Forest pradices in this watershed are intapnted to have increased the abundance of Pisidum carertanum by the aeation of additional habitats. This work contributes to our ability to conserve the freshwater molluscs of northem British Columbia through better undentauding of their diversity, distribution and acology. TABLE OF CONTENTS CEIAPTER 2 - DIVERSITY, DISTRIBUTION AND ECOLOGY OF FRESHWATER MOLLUSC IN NORTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA: CLIMATIC, GEOGRAPHIC, POST-GLACIAL AND O'I'EER ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONSo oooowoeooeweoeoeoooooeooooooeeeooooooooooeooooooooo 12 CEAPTER 3 - COMPARISON OF CONTEMPORARY AND HlSTORIC COLLECTIONS OF FRESHWATER MOLLUSCS AS A MEANS OF ASSESSING ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIWo~~oo~e~o~eoooooeeeooooo~ooooooeoooeeooeo65 Conclusions .......................... ..o.oo...ooo.......o.o...oo..o.....o........o........o.ooooo.....oo...o......o 79 CHAPTER 4 - THE EFFECTS OF FOREST PRACTICES ON FRESHWATER MOLLUSC HABITAT: A CASE STUDY FROM THE TORPY RIVER WATERSEED IN EAST-CENTRAL BRITISH COLUMBIA oooooooooooooaoooooeoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooeoeoooaooooo 81 Study Area ................... .... .... ....................m........................................................83 Habitat Classification ....................................................................................... 84 Sampling ................... .......................................................................................85 Lotic Habitats ...............e.e..e.........................e.............e.................~..................... 87 Lentic Habitats ...................e...........~.................................................................. 89 Ldc vs. Lentic Habitats ..........................++.+..................................................... 90 Community Composition ..~.~~~.~~..~~~~~~~.~~~mm8~~~m~~s~ss~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+8Ss~~~~.~..m9 1 LIST OF TABLES Table 1- 1. Systematic listing of freshwater mollusc found in northem British Columbia (according to Clarke 198 1). ......................................................................................2 Table 2- 1. Group numbers, group composition, table of significant t-tesb and figure numbers for range plots and Canonical Correspondence Analysis of the enviromnental. data for the Grshwater molluscc collected at ecological sites in northern Bntrsh Columbia............................................. ...........................................2 1 Table 2-2. Record types, location map figure number, number of records, number of collections and dates of collection of hhwater molluscs fiom northern British Columbia. ................................................................................................................ 24 Table 23. Systematic list of the hhwater molluscs of northem British Columbia. 44*99 indicates taxa not found at ecological sites.............. .. ............................... 25 Table 24. Number of freshwater mollusc collection sites in the drainages, major watersheds and biogeoclimatic zones in northem British Columbia. ....................... .............26 Table 2-5. Summary of altitude and climate information for the biogeoclimatic zones in northern British Columbia (Meidinger and Pojar 1991). BWBS = Boreal White and Black Spruce; CWH = Coastal Westem Hanlock; ESSF = Engelmann Spruce - Subalpine Fir. ICH = Interior Cedar - Hemlock; SWB = Spruce - Willow - Birch; SBS = Sub-Boreal Spruce. ............................................................ 27 Table 26. Sample size, mean, staaderd cmw and range for the environmental variables mdat the ecological sites in northan British Columbia. ..................... ......... 34 Table 2-7. Significant difleretlces and degrees of Worn(df) in means of environmental variabks found witbin the groups or subgroups of fnshwater mollusc compared. Table 2-7 (cont.) Significant diffkmces and degrees of Worn (df) in means of environmental variables found within the pups or subgroups of fkshwater mollusc compand. ....................... ...... .... .... .................................... 36 Table 2-8. Sunrmary of the distribution and ecology of the bhwater molluscs from ecological sites in northem British Columbia. ..................... ................................... 60 Table 2-9. Proportions of Wwater molluscs froin ecological sites in northem British Columbia as cornpad to the proportions offbhwater molluscs in Britain in relation to dissolved calcium content as described by Russell-Hunter (1978). Northern British Columbia hhwater molluscs d in this oomparison were those with n >2 plus the endemic species, Pljaela wrighti .................... ........ 62 Table 3-1. Species lists for historical and contemponry collections made at sites in northem British Columbia "*" indicates co11ections that were made within the same water body but not at the same sites. Taxa found in both years are indicated in bold. .........69 Table 3-2. Cornparis of collection times (i.e. person-hours) and results of Sormson's Index of .Community Similarjty made been(1) contemporary collections and (2) hrstonc. collections. ...............................................................................................72 Table 3-3. Comparison of number of species and percentage of total number of species of the four fimctiod feeding groups of -water molluscs. Group 1 - Grazers (snails); Group 2 = Suspension fders (mussels and clams of the genera Sphoenum and Mwctrlium); Gmup 3 - Deposit Feeders (clams of the genera Sphaerium and Mwctllium); Group 4 =Infaunal fadas (clams of the genus Pisidurn). .........74 Table 3-5. Species noted by Clarke (1972,1973a) as occurring at sites listed that are not confirmed by voucher specimens at the Canadian Mwum of Nature.. ................78 Table 4-1. Average clam daisity and environmentai conditions (mean f SE [standard emr]) in al1 categories of habitat and riparian condition in the Lower Toqy Riva I watersbed ......................................................................................................................88 Table 4-2. Culvert and upstream densities of Pisidium casertanum. "*" indicates deasity is significantly differait than culvert density at P < 0.05. ............................................. 88 Table 4-3. Results of ANOVA of density of Pisidium cusertunum at culvert pools and various combinations of upstream riparian conditions in the Lower Torpy River watemhexi.. ................4.................................................................................................-89 Table 4-4. Cornparison of lotic and lentic habitats (mean ISE) in the Lowa Torpy River Watershed and probability level of differences in means. .......................................... 90 Table 4-5. List of freshwata
Recommended publications
  • December 2015

    December 2015

    Ellipsaria Vol. 17 - No. 4 December 2015 Newsletter of the Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society Volume 17 – Number 4 December 2015 Cover Story . 1 Society News . 5 Regional Meetings . 9 Upcoming Meetings . 14 Contributed Articles . 15 Obituary . 28 Lyubov Burlakova, Knut Mehler, Alexander Karatayev, and Manuel Lopes-Lima FMCS Officers . 33 On October 4-8, 2015, the Great Lakes Center of Buffalo State College hosted the Second International Meeting on Biology and Conservation of Freshwater Committee Chairs Bivalves. This meeting brought together over 80 scientists from 19 countries on four continents (Europe, and Co-chairs . 34 North America, South America, and Australia). Representation from the United States was rather low, Parting Shot . 35 but that was expected, as several other meetings on freshwater molluscs were held in the USA earlier in the year. Ellipsaria Vol. 17 - No. 4 December 2015 The First International Meeting on Biology and Conservation of Freshwater Bivalves was held in Bragança, Portugal, in 2012. That meeting was organized by Manuel Lopes-Lima and his colleagues from several academic institutions in Portugal. In addition to being a research scientist with the University of Porto, Portugal, Manuel is the IUCN Coordinator of the Red List Authority on Freshwater Bivalves. The goal of the first meeting was to create a network of international experts in biology and conservation of freshwater bivalves to develop collaborative projects and global directives for their protection and conservation. The Bragança meeting was very productive in uniting freshwater mussel biologists from European countries with their colleagues in North and South America. The meeting format did not include concurrent sessions, which allowed everyone to attend to every talk and all of the plenary talks by leading scientists.
  • Freshwater Mussels of the Pacific Northwest

    Freshwater Mussels of the Pacific Northwest

    Freshwater Mussels of the Pacifi c Northwest Ethan Nedeau, Allan K. Smith, and Jen Stone Freshwater Mussels of the Pacifi c Northwest CONTENTS Part One: Introduction to Mussels..................1 What Are Freshwater Mussels?...................2 Life History..............................................3 Habitat..................................................5 Role in Ecosystems....................................6 Diversity and Distribution............................9 Conservation and Management................11 Searching for Mussels.............................13 Part Two: Field Guide................................15 Key Terms.............................................16 Identifi cation Key....................................17 Floaters: Genus Anodonta.......................19 California Floater...................................24 Winged Floater.....................................26 Oregon Floater......................................28 Western Floater.....................................30 Yukon Floater........................................32 Western Pearlshell.................................34 Western Ridged Mussel..........................38 Introduced Bivalves................................41 Selected Readings.................................43 www.watertenders.org AUTHORS Ethan Nedeau, biodrawversity, www.biodrawversity.com Allan K. Smith, Pacifi c Northwest Native Freshwater Mussel Workgroup Jen Stone, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Columbia River Fisheries Program Offi ce, Vancouver, WA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Illustrations,
  • Freshwater Mussels Pacific Northwest

    Freshwater Mussels Pacific Northwest

    Freshwater Mussels of the Pacifi c Northwest Ethan Nedeau, Allan K. Smith, and Jen Stone Freshwater Mussels of the Pacifi c Northwest CONTENTS Part One: Introduction to Mussels..................1 What Are Freshwater Mussels?...................2 Life History..............................................3 Habitat..................................................5 Role in Ecosystems....................................6 Diversity and Distribution............................9 Conservation and Management................11 Searching for Mussels.............................13 Part Two: Field Guide................................15 Key Terms.............................................16 Identifi cation Key....................................17 Floaters: Genus Anodonta.......................19 California Floater...................................24 Winged Floater.....................................26 Oregon Floater......................................28 Western Floater.....................................30 Yukon Floater........................................32 Western Pearlshell.................................34 Western Ridged Mussel..........................38 Introduced Bivalves................................41 Selected Readings.................................43 www.watertenders.org AUTHORS Ethan Nedeau, biodrawversity, www.biodrawversity.com Allan K. Smith, Pacifi c Northwest Native Freshwater Mussel Workgroup Jen Stone, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Columbia River Fisheries Program Offi ce, Vancouver, WA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Illustrations,
  • NEPA-EA-Acls-Coral-R

    NEPA-EA-Acls-Coral-R

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE Pacific Islands Regional Office 1845 Wasp Blvd. Bldg.176 Honolulu, Hawaii 96818 (808) 725-5000 • Fax (808) 725-5215 Environmental Assessment Specification of Annual Catch Limits and Accountability Measures for Pacific Island Coral Reef Ecosystem Fisheries in Fishing Years 2015 through 2018 (RIN 0648-XD558) August 12, 2015 Responsible Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Pacific Islands Regional Office (PIRO) Responsible Official: Michael D. Tosatto Regional Administrator, PIRO 1845 Wasp Blvd., Bldg 176 Honolulu, HI 96818 Tel (808)725-5000 Fax (808)725-5215 Responsible Council: Western Pacific Fishery Management Council 1164 Bishop St. Suite 1400 Honolulu, HI 96813 Tel (808)522-8220 Fax (808)522-8226 Abstract: The Western Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) recommended NMFS specify multi-year annual catch limits (ACL) and accountability measures (AM) effective in fishing years 2015-2018, the environmental effects of which are analyzed in this document. NMFS proposes to implement the specifications for fishing year 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018 separately prior to each fishing year. The specifications pertain to ACLs for coral reef ecosystem fisheries in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ or federal waters; generally 3-200 nautical miles or nm) around American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI), Guam, and Hawaii, and a post-season AM to correct the overage of an ACL if it occurs. Because of the large number of individual coral reef ecosystem management unit species (CREMUS) in each island area, individual species were aggregated into higher taxonomic groups, generally at the family level.
  • Biodiversity and Coarse Woody Debris in Southern Forests Proceedings of the Workshop on Coarse Woody Debris in Southern Forests: Effects on Biodiversity

    Biodiversity and Coarse Woody Debris in Southern Forests Proceedings of the Workshop on Coarse Woody Debris in Southern Forests: Effects on Biodiversity

    Biodiversity and Coarse woody Debris in Southern Forests Proceedings of the Workshop on Coarse Woody Debris in Southern Forests: Effects on Biodiversity Athens, GA - October 18-20,1993 Biodiversity and Coarse Woody Debris in Southern Forests Proceedings of the Workhop on Coarse Woody Debris in Southern Forests: Effects on Biodiversity Athens, GA October 18-20,1993 Editors: James W. McMinn, USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Athens, GA, and D.A. Crossley, Jr., University of Georgia, Athens, GA Sponsored by: U.S. Department of Energy, Savannah River Site, and the USDA Forest Service, Savannah River Forest Station, Biodiversity Program, Aiken, SC Conducted by: USDA Forest Service, Southem Research Station, Asheville, NC, and University of Georgia, Institute of Ecology, Athens, GA Preface James W. McMinn and D. A. Crossley, Jr. Conservation of biodiversity is emerging as a major goal in The effects of CWD on biodiversity depend upon the management of forest ecosystems. The implied harvesting variables, distribution, and dynamics. This objective is the conservation of a full complement of native proceedings addresses the current state of knowledge about species and communities within the forest ecosystem. the influences of CWD on the biodiversity of various Effective implementation of conservation measures will groups of biota. Research priorities are identified for future require a broader knowledge of the dimensions of studies that should provide a basis for the conservation of biodiversity, the contributions of various ecosystem biodiversity when interacting with appropriate management components to those dimensions, and the impact of techniques. management practices. We thank John Blake, USDA Forest Service, Savannah In a workshop held in Athens, GA, October 18-20, 1993, River Forest Station, for encouragement and support we focused on an ecosystem component, coarse woody throughout the workshop process.
  • Patterns of Mekong Mollusc Biodiversity

    Patterns of Mekong Mollusc Biodiversity

    water Article Patterns of Mekong Mollusc Biodiversity: Identification of Emerging Threats and Importance to Management and Livelihoods in a Region of Globally Significant Biodiversity and Endemism Ratha Sor 1,2,3,* , Peng Bun Ngor 3,4 , Pieter Boets 5,6 , Peter L. M. Goethals 5, Sovan Lek 7, Zeb S. Hogan 3,8 and Young-Seuk Park 9 1 Graduate School, Chea Sim University of Kamchaymear, No. 157, Preah Norodom Blvd, Khan Chamkarmon, Phnom Penh 12300, Cambodia 2 Centre for Biodiversity Conservation, Royal University of Phnom Penh, Russian Boulevard, Phnom Penh 12000, Cambodia 3 Wonders of the Mekong Project, c/o IFReD, No. 186, Preah Norodom Blvd., Khan Chamcar Morn, Phnom Penh 12300, Cambodia; [email protected] (P.B.N.); [email protected] (Z.S.H.) 4 Inland Fisheries Research and Development Institute (IFReDI), Fisheries Administration, No. 186, Preah Norodom Blvd., Khan Chamkar Morn, Phnom Penh 12300, Cambodia 5 Aquatic Ecology Research Group, Ghent University, Campus Coupure Building F, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; [email protected] (P.B.); [email protected] (P.L.M.G.) 6 Provincial Centre of Environmental Research, Godshuizenlaan 95, 9000 Ghent, Belgium 7 SEVAB Doctoral School, Laboratoire Evolution & Diversité Biologique, Université Paul Sabatier—Toulouse III, UMR 5174, 118 route de Narbonne, CEDEX 4, 31062 Toulouse, France; [email protected] 8 Global Water Center & Department of Biology, University of Nevada, 1664 N. Virginia Street, Reno, NV 89557, USA 9 Department of Biology, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 12 August 2020; Accepted: 11 September 2020; Published: 18 September 2020 Abstract: The Lower Mekong Basin (LMB) is a key biodiversity hotspot.
  • Freshwater Molluscs

    Freshwater Molluscs

    WILDLIFE IN BRITISH ACOLUMBIAT RISK Freshwater Molluscs Many freshwater Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks mollusc species are at risk due to loss and degradation of aquatic habitats. mussels directly or may reduce the avail- different than that of oceans. In the ability of host fish that they depend ocean, tides result in complex water upon to disperse their young. The intro- flow patterns, whereas inland waters duction of non-native mollusc species are always ultimately flowing in one What are freshwater molluscs? can result in unnatural competition for direction – toward the ocean. In ithin the large group of animals food and habitat, as has occurred in east- order to live in fresh water, molluscs known as molluscs, three subgroups ern North America with the introduc- had to evolve reproductive adapta- – snails, mussels and clams – have tion of the Zebra Mussel. So little is tions that would ensure their eggs Wrepresentatives that live in fresh known about the B.C. freshwater mol- and sperm could meet and that lar- water. Because all freshwater molluscs lusc fauna that it is difficult to assess vae and juveniles could disperse have hard shells that are often washed up which species are currently at risk. without being drawn into that one- on shores, they are some of the most con- way flow to the sea. spicuous of the freshwater invertebrates. Where do they live? About 180 species of freshwater mol- reshwater molluscs live in all types of Freshwater snails luscs are known to occur in Canada. Of wet habitats from large lakes and nails have shells that come in a vari- these, at least 85 species, including 54 rivers to roadside ditches and back- ety of shapes, from flattened, cone- snails, 5 mussels and 26 clams, are found Fyard ponds.
  • Curriculum Vitae David Zanatta, Ph.D

    Curriculum Vitae David Zanatta, Ph.D

    Curriculum Vitae David Zanatta, Ph.D. Address (work): Central Michigan University Department of Biology Institute for Great Lakes Research Biosciences 2408 Mount Pleasant, MI 48859 USA Address (home): 1208 East Broadway St Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 USA Telephone (Office): (989) 774-7829 Telephone (Cell): (989) 444-9130 Fax: (989) 774-3462 Email: [email protected] Homepage: http://people.cst.cmich.edu/zanat1d/ Citizenship: U.S.A. and Canada Academic Positions: Professor, Biology • Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI USA. August 2017-present. Associate Professor, Biology • Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI USA. August 2013-August 2017. Assistant Professor, Biology • Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI USA. August 2008-August 2013. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada, Postdoctoral Fellow • Trent University, Peterborough, ON Canada, sponsor: Dr. C. Wilson. Nov. 2007-July 2008. Education: University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada • Ph.D. in Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, conferred: June 2008, supervisor Dr. R. Murphy. University of Guelph, Guelph, ON Canada • M.Sc. in Zoology, conferred: February 2001, supervisor Dr. G. Mackie Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON Canada • B.Sc. (Hons.), Biology, conferred: June 1998 Research: Peer-reviewed Articles and Book Chapters (including submitted, in review, in revision, and in press; * indicates CMU student author): 1. Layer, M.L.*, T.J. Morris, and D.T. Zanatta. Submitted. Morphometric analysis and DNA barcoding to improve identification of four lampsiline mussel species (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in the Great Lakes region. Freshwater Mollusk Biology and Conservation. 2. Bucholz, J.R.*, N.M. Sard, N.M. VanTassel*, J.D. Lozier, T.J. Morris, A. Paquet, and D.T.
  • Mariana-FEP-SAFE-Rep

    Mariana-FEP-SAFE-Rep

    ANNUAL STOCK ASSESSMENT AND FISHERY EVALUATION REPORT: MARIANA ARCHIPELAGO FISHERY ECOSYSTEM PLAN 2016 Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council 1164 Bishop St., Suite 1400 Honolulu, HI 96813 PHONE: (808) 522-8220 FAX: (808) 522-8226 www.wpcouncil.org The ANNUAL STOCK ASSESSMENT AND FISHERY EVALUATION REPORT for the MARIANA ARCHIPELAGO FISHERY ECOSYSTEM 2016 was drafted by the Fishery Ecosystem Plan Team. This is a collaborative effort primarily between the Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council, NMFS-Pacific Island Fisheries Science Center, Pacific Islands Regional Office, Division of Aquatic Resources (HI) Department of Marine and Wildlife Resources (AS), Division of Aquatic and Wildlife Resources (Guam), and Division of Fish and Wildlife (CNMI). This report attempts to summarize annual fishery performance looking at trends in catch, effort and catch rates as well as provide a source document describing various projects and activities being undertaken on a local and federal level. The report also describes several ecosystem considerations including fish biomass estimates, biological indicators, protected species, habitat, climate change and human dimensions. Information like marine spatial planning and best scientific information available for each fishery are described. This report provides a summary of annual catches relative to the Annual Catch Limits established by the Council in collaboration with the local fishery management agencies. Edited By: Marlowe Sabater, Asuka Ishizaki, Rebecca Walker, and Sylvia Spalding, WPRFMC This document can cited as follows: WPRFMC 2017. Annual Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation Report for the Mariana Archipelago Fishery Ecosystem Plan 2016. Sabater, M., Ishizaki, A., Walker, R., Spalding, S. (Eds.) Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council.
  • Viet-Nam) I S 1959, 223-283

    Viet-Nam) I S 1959, 223-283

    Tire a part des Annales de la Faculte des de 1959 par RIN S iGON (VIET-NAM) I S 1959, 223-283. g ) pa:r MONd SAIJRIN Rfamvr.E. - Cette note etudie la faune de Pyramidellides de la baie de Nha­ 'Trang et de ses abords, recueillie soit dans les sables littoraux, soit dans des dragages effectues par l'Institut oceanographique de Nha-Trang. Cette faune est tres riche et ne comprend pas moins de 210 especes, dont 55 seulement ont pu etre assimilees a des especes deja connues, et qui se repartissent comme suit : 7 Pyramidellinae, J 2 Tiberiinae, 20 Syrnolinae, 27 Odostommiinae, parmi lesquelles predominent les Megastomia, 5 Odostomellinae, 63 Pyrgulininae avec Pyr9ulina tres nombreuses et Besla nombreuses, 5 Menesthinae, 61 Turbonillinae avec les genres dominants Chemnitzia, Pyrgiscus, Pyrgiscilla, 3 Cingulinae, et 7 Eulimellinae. ABSTTIACT. -- This record is working at the Pyramidellid fauna from the bay of Nha-Trang and vicinity, collected in beach sands or dredged by « Institut oceanographique ». This fauna is very prolific and includes no less than 210 species, among these 55 only could be assimilated to already known species. There are 7 Pyramidellinae, 12 Tiberiinae, 20 Syrnolinae, 2~ Odostomiinae with prevailing subgenus M egastomi.a. 5 Odostomellinae, 63 PyrguJininae with very numerous Pyr­ gulina and numerous Besla, 5 Menesthinae, 61 Turbonillinae with leading genera Chemnitzia. Pyrgiscus, Pyrgisciila, 3 Cingulininae, and 7 Eulimellinae. Les Pyramidellidae decrits ou mentionnes clans cette note proviennent de la baie de Nha-Trnng (Sud Viet-Nam) et de ses abords. Ils ont ete recueillis, d'une part, dans les sables littoraux de diverses plages, d'autre part, dans des t~chantillons de fonds drague:::.
  • The Newsletter of the Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society Volume 12 – Number 2 August 2010

    The Newsletter of the Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society Volume 12 – Number 2 August 2010

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olume 12, No. 2 http://www.molluskconservation.org August 2010 President’s Message Transitions It’s been an exciting past several months as I, your Executive Committee, and your Board have all worked to help transition FMCS into a new era of member services and support and outward visibility. Specifically, through the dedication of Greg Zimmerman, Heidi Dunn, Andy Roberts, and many others in the Society, coupled with the expertise and of hard work of Sophie Binder with Sophie Binder Designs, we have unveiled our new Society web site and presence at http://www.molluskconservation.org. I encourage every member to visit the site and look around at what we have to offer. There is information there for people wishing to learn more about mollusks, as well as a new members-only section that with time will allow you to pay dues, register for meetings, access newsletters, update your contact information and submit a manuscript for publication in the Society Journal, among others.
  • Freshwater Mollusc Assemblages and Habitat Associations in the Danube River Drainage, Hungary

    Freshwater Mollusc Assemblages and Habitat Associations in the Danube River Drainage, Hungary

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repository of the Academy's Library AQUATIC CONSERVATION: MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS Aquatic Conserv: Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. (2015) Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com). DOI: 10.1002/aqc.2585 Freshwater mollusc assemblages and habitat associations in the Danube River drainage, Hungary ERIKA BÓDISa,*, BENCE TÓTHa and RONALDO SOUSAb,c aMTA Centre for Ecological Research, Danube Research Institute, Karolina, Budapest, Hungary bInterdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research (CIIMAR/CIMAR), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal cCBMA – Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology, Department of Biology, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal ABSTRACT 1. Native freshwater mollusc diversity has been declining over the past decades. For developing efficient conservation management plans for molluscs, it is especially important to identify areas with high native biodiversity. 2. The River Danube is one of the most important freshwater ecosystems in Europe and should receive special attention. The main objective of this work was to characterize the composition, diversity and conservation status of freshwater molluscs occurring in the Hungarian Danube River Drainage in five river habitat types (main channel of the Rivers Danube and Tisza, side channels of River Danube, tributaries of Rivers Danube and Tisza). 3. In total, 53 mollusc species were identified including 10 invasive species and 12 species of conservation concern. The main determining factors of mollusc composition were sediment characteristics, current velocity and oxygen content. Nitrate–nitrogen, ammonium–nitrogen, and calcium content also play a key role. 4. Overall, density, species richness and diversity showed significant differences between habitat types.