sign in sign up
<<
Home , Pedro de Ampudia, Zachary Taylor

Felice Flanery Lewis. Trailing Clouds of Glory: 's Mexican War Campaign and His Emerging Civil War Leaders. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2010. 352 pp. $35.00, cloth, ISBN 978-0-8173-1678-5.

Reviewed by John M. Belohlavek

Published on H-CivWar (May, 2011)

Commissioned by Martin P. Johnson (Miami University Hamilton)

As the sesquicentennial of the Civil War com‐ bat (at least initially), friendships made, and mences, Americans will engage with renewed vig‐ friends lost. or in one of their favorite past times--arguing over Taylor is clearly the hero of the volume. “Old the talent level of numerous Yankee and Confed‐ Zach,” as Lewis repeatedly dubs him, is dispas‐ erate generals. Devotees of the epic struggle are sionate and compassionate. A thoughtful, practi‐ well aware that the Mexican-American War of cal, and down-to-earth commander, he bore an af‐ 1846-48 served as a training ground for many of fection for his men and little animosity towards those ofcers. Except for the few who endured the the enemy. No wonder that he was widely ad‐ heat and mosquitoes of the recent Second Semi‐ mired by both friend and foe. Taylor nobly did his nole War in Florida, the well-scrubbed graduates duty in dealing with the Mexican army, but want‐ of West Point had little or no combat experience. ed a quick end to the war and moved on several Felice Flanery Lewis seeks to place these men, occasions to achieve a compromise settlement. at least those who fought in northern with James K. Polk is the villain of the volume. The Zachary Taylor, in historical perspective. To her meddlesome president had little respect for “Old credit, the author makes no exaggerated claims Rough and Ready,” rarely took him into his conf‐ for the learning curve of her subjects. Instead, she dence in terms of war planning, and sought to argues that while they obtained valuable experi‐ marginalize him as quickly as possible. Even as he ence in the confict, it is difcult to project partic‐ completed his triumphant stint in late 1847, Tay‐ ular lessons learned in the smaller context upon lor failed to receive the recognition he well de‐ the grander stage of the Civil War. Diaries and let‐ served from either Polk or the War Department. ters infrequently refect on such schooling, but Lewis opens her tale in the spring of 1844 rather emphasize the passionate desire for com‐ with Taylor assembling a sizeable force of regu‐ H-Net Reviews lars at Ft. Jesup, . His mission was to and leadership. Lewis candidly discusses the guard the border and provide reassurance strengths and weaknesses of Old Zach’s subordi‐ for wary Texans as they awaited the ratifcation of nates, but remains defensive of Taylor himself a proposed treaty of annexation to the United whether considering his role at or his States. The reason President selected controversial decision to ofer Mexican comman‐ Taylor for this duty is unclear. While the sixty- der an eight-week armistice. year-old ofcer had fought small groups of Indi‐ An infuriated Polk viewed the armistice as a lost ans in the Old Northwest and Florida, his career opportunity to bring the Mexican army to heel had not been one of great notoriety. When the U.S. and further advance American territorial gains. Senate overwhelmingly rejected the Texas treaty In the president’s mind, the action further dimin‐ in June 1844, tensions along the border only tem‐ ished Taylor’s already shaky reputation. porarily abated. Tyler fnessed an annexation While Taylor’s army remained in occupation agreement by joint resolution from the Congress in Monterrey, Lewis uses the lull to discuss John in March 1845. The newly inaugurated Polk dis‐ Wool’s aborted expedition to take Chihuahua in patched Taylor and almost 3,500 soldiers to dis‐ the fall of 1846, and Stephen Watts Kearny’s tri‐ puted territory: frst to Corpus Christi in July and umphant (and fortunate) advance from Kansas then to the in January 1846. through to . Since Ameri‐ Lewis discusses in great detail the activities can victories had produced no peace settlement, and movements of Taylor and his men as they es‐ the administration decided to proceed with the tablished supply lines at Point Isabel on the Gulf planned Vera Cruz-to- operation to be coast and maneuvered into position across the led by Winfeld Scott. The victorious Taylor was river from Matamoros--and a Mexican army--in thus twice insulted; frst, by being ignored for the the spring. Throughout the work, she frequently new command and second, by having 4,700 regu‐ takes the opportunity to draw biographical lar soldiers stripped from his army. In August sketches of soldiers who would become famous 1862, a corporal in McClellan’s Union Army stum‐ (among them, George Gordon Meade, George B. bled across a small bundle of cigars in a McClellan, Thomas J. Jackson, , feld that outlined the order of march of Lee’s di‐ , Robert E. Lee, and U.S. Grant) and vided army towards Antietem. In a somewhat many others who would die in obscurity. The au‐ similar incident in January 1847, Mexican soldiers thor emphasizes that the Americans, while told killed an American dragoon and discovered sensi‐ that their presence on “Mexican soil” constituted tive dispatches from Taylor to Scott detailing up‐ an act of war, still believed that bloodshed was coming U.S. operations. Arguably, General Santa unlikely. Anna acted with greater dispatch than “Little When American dragoons were ambushed Mac” in seizing the moment. and sixteen killed in April along the north bank of Americans generally view the resultant Battle the Rio Grande, Polk had his casus belli. The au‐ of Buena Vista, then and now, as a great victory. A thor does not deal with the struggle between the twenty-page chapter explores this engagement, president and Congress, but keeps her focus on analyzing how the badly outnumbered Americans the battlefeld. Each of Taylor’s engagements managed to seize victory from the jaws of poten‐ which gained the Americans control of northeast‐ tial defeat. Leadership counted, especially at criti‐ ern Mexico--Palo Alto (May 8), Resaca de la Palma cal points, and so did the devastatingly efective (May 9), and Monterrey (September 21-23)--are artillery. The author makes the interesting point examined very carefully in terms of both tactics that Jeferson Davis’s celebrated stand with his

2 H-Net Reviews

Mississippi Rifes has been much overblown. Nei‐ with current scholarship, a point refected in her ther were his tactics brilliant nor did he make a extensive bibliography and throughout the vol‐ great contribution to the victory. While the Ameri‐ ume where she parries thrusts against the mili‐ can public lauded Taylor’s triumphs and the talk tary reputation of Old Zach. Polk, nevertheless, of his presidential candidacy accelerated, Polk more than Winfeld Scott or Secretary of War marginalized him and his army, both of which William Marcy, remains Taylor’s chief antagonist. had largely “outlived their usefulness” (p. 217). The president has his defenders, but Lewis does Old Zach, disgruntled but loyal, waited until Sep‐ not fully address their arguments made in some tember 1847, when Scott took Mexico City, before studies, such as Robert W. Merry’s A Country of asking for a six-month leave from command and Vast Designs: James K. Polk, the Mexican War and embarking on the road to the . the Conquest of the North American Continent Studies of the Mexican-American War have (2009). While Lewis contends that her fne ac‐ grown steadily over the past decade. While classic count is about the budding and uneven early ca‐ military history has not been left behind (Martin reers of more than 170 future generals, concur‐ Dugard’s The Training Ground: Grant, Lee, Sher‐ rently, it is also the most able narrative and de‐ man, and Davis in the Mexican War, 1846-1848 fense of Zachary Taylor’s command in Mexico [2008] and Christopher Dishman’s A Perfect that has been recently published. Gibraltar: The Battle for Monterrey, Mexico, 1846 [2010] consider some of the same issues as Lewis), fresh topics have received consideration as well. Paul Foos, in A Short, Ofhand, Killing Afair: Sol‐ diers and Social Confict in the Mexican War (2002), ofers an unfattering portrayal of the av‐ erage American soldier, while Brian De Lay’s War of a Thousand Deserts: Indian Raids and the U.S.- Mexican War (2008) reveals the extraordinary na‐ ture of the “Indian problem” in the provinces of northern Mexico. Timothy Henderson, in A Glori‐ ous Defeat: Mexico and Its War with the United States (2008), provides a welcome Mexican per‐ spective. Readers who enjoy a more traditional ap‐ proach, however, will delight in Lewis’s volume. By design, the narrative emphasizes regulars and ofcers. She details the dated arrival and depar‐ ture of various companies and regiments, along with the deployment, command, retirement, in‐ jury, and death among ofcers ranked from gen‐ eral to lieutenant. Her research is most impres‐ sive, the footnotes rich in primary sources, con‐ gressional and War Department documents, but especially the personal papers and diaries of the participants. She is also aware of and engaged

3 H-Net Reviews

If there is additional discussion of this review, you may access it through the network, at https://networks.h-net.org/h-civwar

Citation: John M. Belohlavek. Review of Lewis, Felice Flanery. Trailing Clouds of Glory: Zachary Taylor's Mexican War Campaign and His Emerging Civil War Leaders. H-CivWar, H-Net Reviews. May, 2011.

URL: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=32229

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.

4