FLOWERS and INSECTS LISTS of Vlslloks of FOUR HUNDRED and FIFTY-TIIRFE FLOWERS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FLOWERS and INSECTS LISTS of Vlslloks of FOUR HUNDRED and FIFTY-TIIRFE FLOWERS LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN 581.16 R54f •I...C ^7 Biology tmsmau 'I'he i)ers()n charpinjj this material is re- si)(>nsil)le for its return to the library from whiih it was withdrawn on or before the Latest Date stamped below. Theft, mutilation, and underlining of booki art reotoni for dixiplinary action and may roult In dismiiial from the Univerilty. To renew call Telephone Center, 333-8400 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN 4m AUG 211997 AUG 1 3 2001 ^ ? 2U09 "RR^?lD APR 1 7 1991 MAR 03 1992 MAY 1 c 199^ L161—01096 FLOWERS AND INSECTS LISTS OF VlSllOKS OF FOUR HUNDRED AND FIFTY-TIIRFE FLOWERS By CHARLES ROBERTSON CARUNVILLE, ILUNOIS \')1H THE SCIENCE PEESS FEINTING COMPANY LANCASTEE, PA. Copyrighted 1929 By Charles Robertson M01.0«l u //. / (i> -Ti^^ PREFACE Beginning September, 1S87, and ending July, 1899, the papers mentioned in the bibliography record 7,817 visits to 278 flowers. The i)resent work records 15,172 visits to 441 flowers, nearly twice as many, excluding visits to 12 wind flowers. Mueller's "Fertilisa- tion of flowers" records 5,231 \isits, and his " Alpenblumen" gives 8,491. The ob.senations were made within ten miles of Carlinville. The number of species of bees found on flowei-s at Carlinville is 296: compared with New York, 189; Connecticut, 231; New Jersey, 250. The list of visitors contains types of 232 new species of insects. In identifying insects assistance has been afforded in Hyraenop- tera by W. H. Ashmead, Nathan Banks, J. C. Crawford, E. T. Cresson, R. A. Cushman, A. B. Gahan, W. J. Fox, L, 0. Howard, Thco Pergande, and S. A. Rohwer; in Diptera by J. M. Aldrich, D. W. Coquillett, C. W. Johnson, J. R. Malloch, R. R. Parker, C. H. T. Townsend, and S. W. Williston; in Lepidoptera by G. H. French and C. A. Hart; in Coleoptera by C. A. Frost, C. A. Hart, Charles Liebeck, and Samuel Hen.shaw; in Hemiptera by C. A. Hart, H. M. Parshley, and P. R. Uhler; in Neuroi)tera by Nathan Banks and J. C. Crawford. In 1887 names were rather readily obtained for Syri)hidae, Bombyliidae, and Conopidae. In 1888 for 384 specimens of Diptera, estimated as 89 species, but certainly containing many more, only 17 specific determinations were received. It was hard to get names for Tachinidae until 1891-2 when Townsend supplied them. By Coquillett the Empididae were identified in 1894-5, and many Tachinidae and other Diptera in 1896-1901. For Sar- cophagidae only a few names, some erroneous, were obtained until 1920 when they were determined by Parker. In 1892-1901 many non-aculeate IlNTnenoptcra were identified by Ashmead. Many manuscript names were supplied by him. Some of these have never been described, while others have been described under other names. Particular difficulty was experienced in the ca.se of the bees, by far the most important for the investigation. Of the bees recognized only about 39.8 per cent are mentioned in Cresson 's catalogue of 1887, and of those only about 46.6 per cent were identified for both sexes. At present I know both sexes in 81.7 per cent of the local bees. 3 705533 4 FLOWERS AND INSECTS—XXVI Generally, determinations of bees are unreliable except when both sexes of all of the species are known. When only one sex is known the other is probably mixed with that of another species. Formerly in Agapostemon four species had been distinguished in the females but the males were referred to another species, A. tricolor. There was little chance of separating another real species and this condition had the advantage of indicating five species instead of four. Sometimes the species are separated only in the males and the females ignored. Determinations of the females are twice as important as those of the males since they make twice as many flower visits. On account of the impossibility of getting all of the bees identi- fied it was necessary to describe the new species and match the sexes, thus making a digression which interrupted the study and involved an intrusion into a field which there was no inclination to cultivate. Of all bees the bumblebees are the easiest to collect and identify. Eight species occur at Carlinville. Two species, Bomhus ameri- canorum and Bomhias auricomus, had the females mixed under the name of Bomhus pennsylvanicus and were referred to the male of Bomhias auricomus, while the male of Bomhus americanorum was referred to another genus as Apathus? elatus. The female of another species was identified for me as Bomhus ridingsii. The worker was mentioned in 13, 579, 1891, and the male in 4, 65, 1891. But Bomhus ridingsii turned out to be a sex name of Bomhus hi- maculatus, the prior name of the male of the same species. From my experience I think that a specialist is competent to make determinations, or compare types, only at the time when he is making a careful study of a particular group. In 32 cases I re- ceived two different specific names for the same insect. Your species monger describes the obvious and easy cases, the males and females as distinct species, and passes on the difficulties to some one else. North America is a large region and entomology, or even an order of insects, is a large subject. A specialist's relia- bility bears an inverse relation to the size of the region and the extent of the subject in which he affects authority. Students of bees describe species from all over North America, and even farther, but any one of them, and all of them together, can not identify both sexes of the bees of any locality. All of the observations given here were made for the purpose of ascertaining the different kinds of insect visitors. Collectors ' notes are worthless as data of anthecology because the collector is looking out for particular kinds of insects and not for aU of the kinds which CHARLES ROUERTSUS 5 occur on the flowers. They are worthless as data of insect habits because the collector is certain to select the llowei-s which are most favorable for obsen'ation and which are most attractive to the kinds of insects he is after. Collectoi-s' notes almost invariably fail to indicate what the insects are doiuf? on the flowei-s and whether they affect pollination or not. The followinj? persons made additions to the local lists of the plants mentioned—Prof. I. H. Benham: Blephilia hirsula, Eupa- torium perfoliatum, Teucrium canadense; Georpe T. Palmer: Erujeron ramosus, Sftachys palustris; Robertson Palmer: Ellisia nyctflaca, Jlypoiis hirsutn, Pohmonium rcpfans, Smnbucus cana- densL<:, ScutcUana imrvula; H. B. Parks: Achillea viilU folium, Apocynum cannabinum, Blephilia ciliata. Cassia chamaccrista, Ceanothiis americanus, Cicuta ma^ulafa, Cucurhita pepo, Eryngium yuccifolium, Eulophtts amencanus, Lcpachys jrinnata, Monarda fistulosa, Pastinaca satira, Polyyala sanguinea, Prunus americana, P. serotina, Pycnantheminn flesuosum, P. pilosum, Rhus copallina, R. glabra, Rosa humilis, R. setigera, Salix nigra, Samhucus cana- densis, Stenanthixim august ifolimn, Veronica inrginica. In some cases the lists were based on the older nomenclature, so that I did not care to rewrite and rearrange them. In the pre- liminary' list some of the later specific names are given in paren- thesis. After changing Danais archippus to Aiiosia plcxippus it is a little tiresome to change it back to former name, and then to Danaus. An3'how, biological nomenclature is s\nion}Tnical. not bi- nomial. The older names usually have more important relation to anthecological literature. Authors will have to use them whether they like them or not. Often the synon^Tny is a subject of con- troversy. Of 455 plants mentioned here, about 70 have their names chanircl in fJrav's Manual. Flowers and Insects Signs, Abbreviations, Etc. ab = abundant; c = collecting pollen; cf = collecting and feeding on pollen ; csp = collecting stray pollen ; cult = cultivated ; expl = ex- ploratory visit; f= feeding on pollen; fq = frequent; fsp = feeding on stray pollen; gn = gnawing; in cop = in copula; int = introduced, not indigenous; Ip = labial palps; Ma = non-social long-tongued bee flower; Mas = social long-tongued bee flower; Mi = non-social short- tongued bee flower; Mis = social short-toiigued bee flower; mp = maxillary palps; n = non-pollinating; = ornithophilous; ol = oli- golege ; = Pol polytropic ; pred = predaceous ; R = red and all dark colors; S = sphingophilous ; sc = sucking nectar and collecting pol- len sf = ; ; sucking nectar and feeding on pollen ; W = white Y = yel- low, greenish to orange = = = ; (^ male ; $ female ; $ worker. When no other indications are used after a name, the insect is counted as sucking nectar legitimately and effecting pollination. Dates connected by a dash after "visitors observed" do not indicate the number of days, but only the period within which the observa- tions were made. Signs in parentheses after a group name mean that the signs belong to each one of the insects mentioned in the group. For example, "Halict. ($, c)" means that all of the fol- lowing Ilalictidae are females and all collecting pollen. After family names the ending "idae" is not repeated, as Ifalict. for Halictidae. When only one species of a genus was ob- served, the specific name is not repeated in the lists. Thus Apis = Apis mellifera $. This avoids repeating mellifera 216 times. Four hundred and forty-four genera have only one species each, which it is not necessary to repeat. The plant names used are those of the 7tli edition of Gray's Manual of Botany, 1908. Numbers in parentheses, for example (12: 459), refer to the titles and pages in the bibliography, or to species and individuals.
Recommended publications
  • Vol. 16, No. 2 Summer 1983 the GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST
    MARK F. O'BRIEN Vol. 16, No. 2 Summer 1983 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST PUBLISHED BY THE MICHIGAN EN1"OMOLOGICAL SOCIErry THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Published by the Michigan Entomological Society Volume 16 No.2 ISSN 0090-0222 TABLE OF CONTENTS Seasonal Flight Patterns of Hemiptera in a North Carolina Black Walnut Plantation. 7. Miridae. J. E. McPherson, B. C. Weber, and T. J. Henry ............................ 35 Effects of Various Split Developmental Photophases and Constant Light During Each 24 Hour Period on Adult Morphology in Thyanta calceata (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) J. E. McPherson, T. E. Vogt, and S. M. Paskewitz .......................... 43 Buprestidae, Cerambycidae, and Scolytidae Associated with Successive Stages of Agrilus bilineatus (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) Infestation of Oaks in Wisconsin R. A. Haack, D. M. Benjamin, and K. D. Haack ............................ 47 A Pyralid Moth (Lepidoptera) as Pollinator of Blunt-leaf Orchid Edward G. Voss and Richard E. Riefner, Jr. ............................... 57 Checklist of American Uloboridae (Arachnida: Araneae) Brent D. Ope II ........................................................... 61 COVER ILLUSTRATION Blister beetles (Meloidae) feeding on Siberian pea-tree (Caragana arborescens). Photo­ graph by Louis F. Wilson, North Central Forest Experiment Station, USDA Forest Ser....ice. East Lansing, Michigan. THE MICHIGAN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY 1982-83 OFFICERS President Ronald J. Priest President-Elect Gary A. Dunn Executive Secretary M. C. Nielsen Journal Editor D. C. L. Gosling Newsletter Editor Louis F. Wilson The Michigan Entomological Society traces its origins to the old Detroit Entomological Society and was organized on 4 November 1954 to " ... promote the science ofentomology in all its branches and by all feasible means, and to advance cooperation and good fellowship among persons interested in entomology." The Society attempts to facilitate the exchange of ideas and information in both amateur and professional circles, and encourages the study of insects by youth.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016
    Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016 April 1981 Revised, May 1982 2nd revision, April 1983 3rd revision, December 1999 4th revision, May 2011 Prepared for U.S. Department of Commerce Ohio Department of Natural Resources National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Division of Wildlife Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management 2045 Morse Road, Bldg. G Estuarine Reserves Division Columbus, Ohio 1305 East West Highway 43229-6693 Silver Spring, MD 20910 This management plan has been developed in accordance with NOAA regulations, including all provisions for public involvement. It is consistent with the congressional intent of Section 315 of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, and the provisions of the Ohio Coastal Management Program. OWC NERR Management Plan, 2011 - 2016 Acknowledgements This management plan was prepared by the staff and Advisory Council of the Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve (OWC NERR), in collaboration with the Ohio Department of Natural Resources-Division of Wildlife. Participants in the planning process included: Manager, Frank Lopez; Research Coordinator, Dr. David Klarer; Coastal Training Program Coordinator, Heather Elmer; Education Coordinator, Ann Keefe; Education Specialist Phoebe Van Zoest; and Office Assistant, Gloria Pasterak. Other Reserve staff including Dick Boyer and Marje Bernhardt contributed their expertise to numerous planning meetings. The Reserve is grateful for the input and recommendations provided by members of the Old Woman Creek NERR Advisory Council. The Reserve is appreciative of the review, guidance, and council of Division of Wildlife Executive Administrator Dave Scott and the mapping expertise of Keith Lott and the late Steve Barry.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Stink Bug Feeding Damage in Louisiana Soybean
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2012 Assessment of stink bug feeding damage in Louisiana soybean: use of a no-choice feeding field protocol Jessica Leigh Parker Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Parker, Jessica Leigh, "Assessment of stink bug feeding damage in Louisiana soybean: use of a no-choice feeding field protocol" (2012). LSU Master's Theses. 809. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/809 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ASSESSMENT OF STINK BUG FEEDING DAMAGE IN LOUISIANA SOYBEAN: USE OF A NO-CHOICE FEEDING FIELD PROTOCOL A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in The Department of Entomology by Jessica Leigh Parker B.S. Texas A&M University, 2008 May, 2012 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to express my appreciation to the Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, the faculty and staff of the Louisiana State University Department of Entomology, and the personnel at the Macon Ridge Research Station. Thanks to the numerous student workers of the Macon Ridge Research Station for many hours of hard work collecting stink bugs and executing infestations in the humid Louisiana heat, without their help completion of this project would have been nearly impossible.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Raupenfliegen (Diptera: Tachinidae) Mitteleuropas: Bestimmungstabellen Und Angaben Zur Verbreitung Und Ökologie Der Einzelnen Arten
    5 download Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde Serie A (Biologie) Herausgeber: 4fr für Naturkunde, RosensteinV 70 19 l; , Staatliches Museum 1, D- r Stuttgart Stuttgarter Beitr. Naturk. Ser. A Nr. 506 170 S ,4. 9. 19.94 Professor Dr. Bernhard Ziegler zum 65. Geburtstag Die Raupenfliegen (Diptera: Tachinidae) Mitteleuropas: Bestimmungstabellen und Angaben zur Verbreitung und Ökologie der einzelnen Arten The Tachinids (Diptera: Tachinidae) of Central Europe: Identification Keys for the Species and Data on Distribution and Ecology Von Hans-Peter Tschorsnig und Benno Herting, Stuttgart Mit 291 Abbildungen Summary Keys are given for all central and northern European species of Tachinidae (Diptera). The most important data on distribution and ecology (mainly habitat, phenology, and host-range) are listed for the central European species. Zuammenfassung Es werden Bestimmungsschlüssel für alle in Mittel- und Nordeuropa vorkommenden Arten der Tachinidae (Diptera) gegeben. Für jede mitteleuropäische Art werden die wichtigsten Kenndaten zur Verbreitung und Ökologie (vor allem Habitat, Flugzeit und Wirtskreis) aufge- listet. Inhalt 1. Einleitung 2 2. Beg'iff.c erklärungen 4 2.1. Allgemeines 4 2.2. Kopf 5 2.3. Thorax 7 2.4. Flügel 8 2.5. Beine 9 2.6. Abdomen 10 2.7. Bereifung 11 2.8. Färbung . 11 download Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ 2 STUTTGARTER BEITRÄGE ZUR NATURKUNDE Ser. A, Nr. 506 2.9. Körpergröße 11 2.10. Abkürzungen 11 3. Schlüssel für die Gattungen 12 4. Schlüssel für die Arten . 42 4.1. Subfamilie Exoristinae 42 4.2. Subfamilie Tachininae 63 4.3. Subfamilie Dexiinae 79 4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Larose Forest Bioblitz Report 2010 the Ottawa Field-Naturalists' Club 31 St.Paul Street Box 35069 Westgate PO, Ottawa on K1Z 1A2 P.O
    Larose Forest BioBlitz Report 2010 The Ottawa Field-Naturalists' Club 31 St.Paul Street Box 35069 Westgate PO, Ottawa ON K1Z 1A2 P.O. Box 430 613- 722-3050 Alfred, ON K0B 1A0 www.ofnc.ca 613-679-0936 www.intendanceprescott-russell.org/stewardship_council.php The Prescott-Russell Stewardship Council was established in 1998 as part of the Ontario Stewardship Program an initiative of the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. This program has 42 Stewardship Councils, volunteers groups of representative landowners and land interest groups who determine the environmental priorities for a given area, usually a county, in Ontario. The Prescott-Russell Stewardship Council has projects and operational funding which act as the catalyst to ensure that good ideas can be translated into projects. Some of the projects implemented by the Prescott-Russell Stewardship Council are: the re-introduction of wild turkeys in Prescott-Russell; seminars for woodlot owners; greening programs; the French Envirothon; the Water Well Identification Program; and the Alfred Birding Trail, among others. The Ottawa Field-Naturalists’ Club was founded in 1879. The club promotes appreciation, preservation and conservation of Canada’s natural heritage. The OFNC produces two quarterly publications: the peer- reviewed journal, The Canadian Field-Naturalist, reporting research in Canadian natural history, and Trail and Landscape, providing articles on natural history of the Ottawa Valley. This report was commissioned by the Prescott-Russell Stewardship Council and The Ottawa Field-Naturalists’ Club Written and prepared by Christine Hanrahan. Thank you to the United Counties of Prescott-Russell for supporting this report Photographs provided by : Joffre Cote, Christine Hanrahan, Diane Lepage, Gillian Mastromatteo 2010 - © Prescott-Russell Stewardship Council / Ottawa Field-Naturalists’ Club THE LAROSE FOREST BIOBLITZ - 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary ...............................................................3 Introduction ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomoidea
    VIVIANA CAUDURO MATESCO SISTEMÁTICA DE THYREOCORIDAE AMYOT & SERVILLE (HEMIPTERA: HETEROPTERA: PENTATOMOIDEA): REVISÃO DE ALKINDUS DISTANT, MORFOLOGIA DO OVO DE DUAS ESPÉCIES DE GALGUPHA AMYOT & SERVILLE E ANÁLISE CLADÍSTICA DE CORIMELAENA WHITE, COM CONSIDERAÇÕES SOBRE A FILOGENIA DE THYREOCORIDAE, E MORFOLOGIA DO OVO DE 16 ESPÉCIES DE PENTATOMIDAE COMO EXEMPLO DO USO DE CARACTERES DE IMATUROS EM FILOGENIAS Tese apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, como requisito parcial à obtenção do Título de Doutor em Biologia Animal. Área de concentração: Biologia Comparada Orientadora: Profa. Dra. Jocelia Grazia Co-Orientador: Prof. Dr. Cristiano F. Schwertner UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL PORTO ALEGRE 2014 “Sistemática de Thyreocoridae Amyot & Serville (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomoidea): revisão de Alkindus Distant, morfologia do ovo de duas espécies de Galgupha Amyot & Serville e análise cladística de Corimelaena White, com considerações sobre a filogenia de Thyreocoridae, e morfologia do ovo de 16 espécies de Pentatomidae como exemplo de uso de caracteres de imaturos em filogenias” VIVIANA CAUDURO MATESCO Tese apresentada como parte dos requisitos para obtenção de grau de Doutor em Biologia Animal, área de concentração Biologia Comparada. ________________________________________ Prof. Dr. Augusto Ferrari (UFRGS) ________________________________________ Dra. Caroline Greve (CNPq ex-bolsista PDJ) ________________________________________ Prof. Dr. Cláudio José Barros de Carvalho (UFPR) ________________________________________ Profa. Dra. Jocelia Grazia (Orientadora) Porto Alegre, 05 de fevereiro de 2014. AGRADECIMENTOS À minha orientadora, Profa. Dra. Jocelia Grazia, pelos ensinamentos e por todas as oportunidades que me deu durante os treze anos em que estive no Laboratório de Entomologia Sistemática. Ao meu co-orientador, Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Invasive Species Action Plan
    Oregon Invasive Species Action Plan June 2005 Martin Nugent, Chair Wildlife Diversity Coordinator Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife PO Box 59 Portland, OR 97207 (503) 872-5260 x5346 FAX: (503) 872-5269 [email protected] Kev Alexanian Dan Hilburn Sam Chan Bill Reynolds Suzanne Cudd Eric Schwamberger Risa Demasi Mark Systma Chris Guntermann Mandy Tu Randy Henry 7/15/05 Table of Contents Chapter 1........................................................................................................................3 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 What’s Going On?........................................................................................................................................ 3 Oregon Examples......................................................................................................................................... 5 Goal............................................................................................................................................................... 6 Invasive Species Council................................................................................................................. 6 Statute ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 Functions .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Insects of Larose Forest (Excluding Lepidoptera and Odonates)
    Insects of Larose Forest (Excluding Lepidoptera and Odonates) • Non-native species indicated by an asterisk* • Species in red are new for the region EPHEMEROPTERA Mayflies Baetidae Small Minnow Mayflies Baetidae sp. Small minnow mayfly Caenidae Small Squaregills Caenidae sp. Small squaregill Ephemerellidae Spiny Crawlers Ephemerellidae sp. Spiny crawler Heptageniiidae Flatheaded Mayflies Heptageniidae sp. Flatheaded mayfly Leptophlebiidae Pronggills Leptophlebiidae sp. Pronggill PLECOPTERA Stoneflies Perlodidae Perlodid Stoneflies Perlodid sp. Perlodid stonefly ORTHOPTERA Grasshoppers, Crickets and Katydids Gryllidae Crickets Gryllus pennsylvanicus Field cricket Oecanthus sp. Tree cricket Tettigoniidae Katydids Amblycorypha oblongifolia Angular-winged katydid Conocephalus nigropleurum Black-sided meadow katydid Microcentrum sp. Leaf katydid Scudderia sp. Bush katydid HEMIPTERA True Bugs Acanthosomatidae Parent Bugs Elasmostethus cruciatus Red-crossed stink bug Elasmucha lateralis Parent bug Alydidae Broad-headed Bugs Alydus sp. Broad-headed bug Protenor sp. Broad-headed bug Aphididae Aphids Aphis nerii Oleander aphid* Paraprociphilus tesselatus Woolly alder aphid Cicadidae Cicadas Tibicen sp. Cicada Cicadellidae Leafhoppers Cicadellidae sp. Leafhopper Coelidia olitoria Leafhopper Cuernia striata Leahopper Draeculacephala zeae Leafhopper Graphocephala coccinea Leafhopper Idiodonus kelmcottii Leafhopper Neokolla hieroglyphica Leafhopper 1 Penthimia americana Leafhopper Tylozygus bifidus Leafhopper Cercopidae Spittlebugs Aphrophora cribrata
    [Show full text]
  • Identification, Biology, Impacts, and Management of Stink Bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) of Soybean and Corn in the Midwestern United States
    Journal of Integrated Pest Management (2017) 8(1):11; 1–14 doi: 10.1093/jipm/pmx004 Profile Identification, Biology, Impacts, and Management of Stink Bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) of Soybean and Corn in the Midwestern United States Robert L. Koch,1,2 Daniela T. Pezzini,1 Andrew P. Michel,3 and Thomas E. Hunt4 1 Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, 1980 Folwell Ave., Saint Paul, MN 55108 ([email protected]; Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jipm/article-abstract/8/1/11/3745633 by guest on 08 January 2019 [email protected]), 2Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected], 3Department of Entomology, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, 210 Thorne, 1680 Madison Ave. Wooster, OH 44691 ([email protected]), and 4Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska, Haskell Agricultural Laboratory, 57905 866 Rd., Concord, NE 68728 ([email protected]) Subject Editor: Jeffrey Davis Received 12 December 2016; Editorial decision 22 March 2017 Abstract Stink bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) are an emerging threat to soybean and corn production in the midwestern United States. An invasive species, the brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Sta˚ l), is spreading through the region. However, little is known about the complex of stink bug species associ- ated with corn and soybean in the midwestern United States. In this region, particularly in the more northern states, stink bugs have historically caused only infrequent impacts to these crops. To prepare growers and agri- cultural professionals to contend with this new threat, we provide a review of stink bugs associated with soybean and corn in the midwestern United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera) of the Czech Republic
    © Entomologica Fennica. 30 March 2009 Annotated host catalogue for the Tachinidae (Diptera) of the Czech Republic Jaromir Vafihara*, Hans-Peter Tschorsnig, Benno Herting’r, Petr Mfickstein & Veronika Michalkova J P. & V. Vanhara, ., Tschorsnig, H.-P., Herting, B., Miickstein, Michalkova, 2009: Annotated host catalogue for the Tachinidae (Diptera) of the Czech Re- public. — Entomol. Fennica 20: 22—48. An annotated host catalogue is given for the Tachinidae ofthe Czech Republic. It comprises 149 of476 tachinid species which are currently known from this coun- try (included the two new records cited below). 195 hosts are listed. The first host records ofTachinidae date back to the second halfofthe 19th century. The bibli- ography for the host records consists of 1 16 papers of 55 researchers. Several re- cords of hitherto unpublished material are included. Phryxe setifacies and Anthomyiopsis plagioderae are first records for the Czech Republic. J. Vanhara (*corresponding author), Masaryk University, Faculty ofScience, Kotlarska 2, CZ—6I I 3 7 Brno, Czech Republic, [email protected] H.—P. Tschorsnig, Staatliches Museumflir Naturkunde, Rosenstein I, D— 70 191 Stuttgart, Germany, tschorsnig.smns@naturkundemuseum—bw.de P. Muckstein Administration of the Protected Landscape Area Zd’drske' vrchy, Brnenska 39, CZ—591 01 Zd’dr nad Sazavou, Czech Republic, muchstein @email.cz V. Michalkova, Masaryk University, Faculty ofScience, Kotlarska 2, CZ—6I I 3 7 Brno, Czech Republic, [email protected] Received 22 August 200 7, accepted 21 January 2008 1. Introduction The tachinid species are listed in their actual valid nomenclature; probable misidentifications Tachinidae are a very large and important dipter- are — if possible — tentatively corrected, but the an family of (mainly) insect parasitoids.
    [Show full text]
  • Tobacco Cutworms
    TECHNICAL BULLETIN NO. 88 MAY, 1929 TOBACCO CUTWORMS BY S. E. CRUMB Entomologist, Division of Truck-Crop Insects Bureau of Entomology LIBRARY! RECEIVED \ • AUG3 0 1929 •! UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, WASHINGTON, D. C. 0. S. «OVEllliMElIT PI(IMT1N6 OFPlCBt Itt» TECHNICAL BULLETIN NO. 88 MAY, 1929 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE • WASHINGTON, D. C TOBACCO CUTWORMS By S'. E. CRUMB Entomologist, Division of Truck-Crop Insects, Bureau of Entomology ^ CONTENTS Page Page -General consideration of tobacco cut- Consideration of the species 52 worms 1 The Feltia group __. 52 Distribution 3 The Euxoa group 86 Coloration of larvae 6 Genus Polia 115 Anatomy of larvae 7 The C-nigrum group 132 Outline for description of a cut- Genus Prodenia 142 worm 26 Remedial control of cutworms 156 Key to the cutworms which at- Poisons applied to plants 156 tack tobacco 26 Poisoned baits 158 Eggs and first-instar larvae 29 Other control methods 171 Pupae of tobacco cutworms 31 Literature cited 176 Breeding methods 33 Seasonal history 37 Natural control of cutworms 38 GENERAL CONSIDERATION OF TOBACCO CUTWORMS Tobacco is one of those crops, grown in plant beds and trans- planted to the open field, which are especially vulnerable to cut- worm attack.» Agricultural practice has accentuated its liability to injury by supplying conditions in the preceding crop (clover, grass, or weeds) which favor the multiplication of cutworms. With some types of tobacco it is desirable that all of the plants in a field ripen at about the same time. In such cases cutworm damage at trans- plajiting time may be unusually important.
    [Show full text]
  • VOL. LIII. GUELPH, MAY, 1921. No. 5 A. G. POPULAR and PRAC
    - - -- - -- _ --- -- -- - A -- - -- VOL. LIII. GUELPH, MAY, 1921. No. 5 - -- ------- - - - - - - - - -- -- -- - - _ --_- JOHN MXCOUN ME;\IORIAL. At the request of natulalists generally throughout Canada, the Ottawa Field-Naturalists' Club has decided to receive subscriptions for a permanent lne~llorialin honor of the late Prof. Jol111 SIacolul~.Naturalist of the Geological Survey of Canada, who died at Sidney, R. C., on July 18, 1920. The wide field of natural hisiory 1~0rlito which John Macoun devoted his life is well known, II~Lonly throughout Canada but in other countries as well. He specialized particularly in botal~yand was the founder of the Canadian Ka- tional herbarium. Other sciences, however, especially zoology, were also greatly enriched by him; he will always he remembered as a great pioneer in Canadian natural history. Many friends of the late John Macoun, particularly ill Toronto and Ottawa, have thought that the ~nemorialshould take the form of a painted por- trait to be hung in the Victoria Aleinorial J!Iuseuln. Such a inelnorial has now been decided upon and a painiitlg will be n~atleby Mr. Franklin Rrownell of Ottawa, the well-known portrait painter. Expenses in connection therewith wlll he about $70. Subscriptions to this fund should he forn~ardeclto Mr. Arthur Gibson, Dominion Entomologist, Ottawa. Should the ltst be oversubscribed arrangeinents may be made whereby those subscribing above a certain stun, which now cannot be defined, will receive a reproduction of the painting. A. G. POPULAR AND PRAC'STCXL ENTOMOT,OCY. PARASITESOF t17~r: PALE: \VI+S*I~~RN CUTWORRT IN AI,RERTA. BY F:. H.
    [Show full text]