2396_AWL_Bennett_Ch16 6/26/03 1:58 PM Page 521
16 Properties of Stars
LEARNING GOALS
16.1 Snapshot of the Heavens 16.5 The Hertzsprung–Russell Diagram • How can we learn about the lives of stars, which last • What is the Hertzsprung–Russell (H–R) diagram? millions to billions of years? • What are the major features of the H–R diagram? • What are the two main elements in all stars? • How do stars differ along the main sequence? • What two basic physical properties do astronomers • What determines the length of time a star spends on use to classify stars? the main sequence? • What are Cepheid variable stars, and why are they 16.2 Stellar Luminosity important to astronomers? • What is luminosity, and how do we determine it? • How do we measure the distance to nearby stars? 16.6 Star Clusters • How does the magnitude of a star relate to its • What are the two major types of star cluster? apparent brightness? • Why are star clusters useful for studying stellar evolution? 16.3 Stellar Surface Temperature • How do we measure the age of a star cluster? • How are stars classified into spectral types? • What determines a star’s spectral type? 16.4 Stellar Masses • What is the most important property of a star? • What are the three major classes of binary star systems? • How do we measure stellar masses?
521 2396_AWL_Bennett_Ch16 6/26/03 1:58 PM Page 522
“All men have the stars,” he answered, mysterious points of light in the sky. We now know that all “but they are not the same things for stars form in great clouds of gas and dust. Each star begins different people. For some, who are its life with roughly the same chemical composition: About travelers, the stars are guides. For others three-quarters of the star’s mass at birth is hydrogen, and they are no more than little lights in the about one-quarter is helium, with no more than about 2% sky. For others, who are scholars, they consisting of elements heavier than helium. During most are problems. For my businessman they of any star’s life, the rate at which it generates energy de- were wealth. But all these stars are pends on the same type of balance between the inward pull silent. You—you alone—will have the of gravity and the outward push of internal pressure that stars as no one else has them.” governs the rate of fusion in our Sun. Despite these similarities, stars appear different from Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, from The Little Prince one another for two primary reasons: They differ in mass, and we see different stars at different stages of their lives. The key that finally unlocked these secrets of stars was n a clear, dark night, a few thousand stars an appropriate classification system. Before the twentieth are visible to the naked eye. Many more century, humans classified stars primarily by their bright- ness and location in our sky. The names of the brightest become visible through binoculars, and O stars within each constellation still bear Greek letters desig- with a powerful telescope we can see so many stars nating their order of brightness. For example, the brightest that we could never hope to count them. Like indi- star in the constellation Centaurus is Alpha Centauri, the second brightest is Beta Centauri, the third brightest is vidual people, each individual star is unique. Like the Gamma Centauri, and so on. However, a star’s brightness human family, all stars share much in common. and membership in a constellation tell us little about its true Today, we know that stars are born from clouds nature. A star that appears bright could be either extremely luminous or unusually nearby, and two stars that appear of interstellar gas, shine brilliantly by nuclear fusion right next to each other in our sky might not be true neigh- for millions or billions of years, and then die, some- bors if they lie at significantly different distances from Earth. times in dramatic ways. This chapter outlines how Today, astronomers classify a star primarily according to its luminosity and surface temperature. Our task in this we study and categorize stars and how we have come chapter is to learn how this extraordinarily effective classi- to realize that stars, like people, change over their fication system reveals the true natures of stars and their lifetime. life cycles. We begin by investigating how to determine a star’s luminosity, surface temperature, and mass.
ypla om ce n . o c r o
t m
s
a Measuring Cosmic Distances Tutorial, Lesson 2 16.1 Snapshot of the Heavens Imagine that an alien spaceship flies by Earth on a simple 16.2 Stellar Luminosity but short mission: The visitors have just 1 minute to learn A star’s luminosity is the total amount of power it radiates everything they can about the human race. In 60 seconds, into space, which can be stated in watts. For example, the they will see next to nothing of each individual person’s Sun’s luminosity is 3.8 1026 watts [Section 15.2].We can- life. Instead, they will obtain a collective “snapshot” of hu- not measure a star’s luminosity directly, because its bright- manity that shows people from all stages of life engaged in ness in our sky depends on its distance as well as its true their daily activities. From this snapshot alone, they must luminosity. For example, our Sun and Alpha Centauri A piece together their entire understanding of human beings (the brightest of three stars in the Alpha Centauri system) and their lives, from birth to death. are similar in luminosity, but Alpha Centauri A is a feeble We face a similar problem when we look at the stars. point of light in the night sky, while our Sun provides Compared with stellar lifetimes of millions or billions enough light and heat to sustain life on Earth. The differ- of years, the few hundred years humans have spent study- ence in brightness arises because Alpha Centauri A is ing stars with telescopes is rather like the aliens’ 1-minute about 270,000 times farther from Earth than is the Sun. glimpse of humanity. We see only a brief moment in any More precisely, we define the apparent brightness of star’s life, and our collective snapshot of the heavens con- any star in our sky as the amount of light reaching us per sists of such frozen moments for billions of stars. From this unit area (Figure 16.1). (A more technical term for appar- snapshot, we try to reconstruct the life cycles of stars while ent brightness is flux.) The apparent brightness of any light also analyzing what makes one star different from another. source obeys an inverse square law with distance, similar Thanks to the efforts of hundreds of astronomers to the inverse square law that describes the force of grav- studying this snapshot of the heavens, stars are no longer ity [Section 5.3].Ifwe viewed the Sun from twice Earth’s
522 part V•Stellar Alchemy 2396_AWL_Bennett_Ch16 6/26/03 1:58 PM Page 523
COMMON MISCONCEPTIONS Luminosity is the total amount of power (energy per second) Photos of Stars the star radiates into space.
Photographs of stars, star clusters, and galaxies convey a great deal of information, but they also contain a few arti- facts that are not real. For example, different stars seem to have different sizes in photographs, but stars are so far away that they should all appear as mere points of light. Stellar sizes in photographs are an artifact of how our instruments record light. Because of the problem of overexposure, brighter stars tend to appear larger than dimmer stars. Overexposure can be a particular problem for photo- graphs of globular clusters of stars and photographs of galaxies. These objects are so much brighter near their centers than in their outskirts that the centers are al- most always overexposed in photographs that show the Apparent brightness is the amount of starlight outskirts. That is why globular clusters and galaxies often Not to scale! reaching Earth (energy look in photographs as if their central regions contain a per second per square single bright blob, when in fact the centers contain many meter). individual stars separated by vast amounts of space. Figure 16.1 Luminosity is a measure of power, and apparent Spikes around bright stars in photographs, often brightness is a measure of power per unit area. making the pattern of a cross with a star at the center, are another such artifact. These spikes are not real but rather are created by the interaction of starlight with the supports holding the secondary mirror in the telescope [Section 7.2]. The spikes generally occur only with point sources of light like stars, and not with larger objects like galaxies. When you look at a photograph showing many galaxies (for example, Figure 20.1), you can tell which objects are stars by looking for the spikes.
2 distance, it would appear dimmer by a factor of 2 4. If 1 AU we viewed it from 10 times Earth’s distance, it would ap- 2 AU pear 102 100 times dimmer. From 270,000 times Earth’s distance, it would look like Alpha Centauri A—dimmer 3 AU by a factor of 270,0002,or about 70 billion. Figure 16.2 shows why apparent brightness follows an inverse square law. The same total amount of light must pass through each imaginary sphere surrounding the star. Figure 16.2 The inverse square law for light. At greater distances If we focus our attention on the light passing through a from a star, the same amount of light passes through an area that small square on the sphere located at 1 AU, we see that the gets larger with the square of the distance. The amount of light same amount of light must pass through four squares of per unit area therefore declines with the square of the distance. the same size on the sphere located at 2 AU. Thus, each 1 1 square on the sphere at 2 AU receives only 22 4 as much light as the square on the sphere at 1 AU. Similarly, the same nosity, and distance of any light source. We will call it the amount of light passes through nine squares of the same luminosity–distance formula: size on the sphere located at 3 AU. Thus, each of these luminosity 1 1 squares receives only 2 as much light as the square apparent brightness 3 9 4p (distance)2 on the sphere at 1 AU. Generalizing, we see that the amount of light received per unit area decreases with increasing dis- Because the standard units of luminosity are watts, the tance by the square of the distance—an inverse square law. units of apparent brightness are watts per square meter. This inverse square law leads to a very simple and Because we can always measure the apparent brightness important formula relating the apparent brightness, lumi- of a star, this formula provides a way to calculate a star’s
chapter 16 • Properties of Stars 523 2396_AWL_Bennett_Ch16 6/26/03 1:58 PM Page 524
luminosity if we can first measure its distance or to calcu- When we measure the apparent brightness in visible late a star’s distance if we somehow know its luminosity. light, we can calculate only the star’s visible-light luminosity. (The luminosity–distance formula is strictly correct only Similarly, when we observe a star with a spaceborne X-ray if interstellar dust does not absorb or scatter the starlight telescope, we measure only the apparent brightness in X rays along its path to Earth.) and can calculate only the star’s X-ray luminosity. We will Although watts are the standard units for luminosity, use the terms total luminosity and total apparent bright- it’s often more meaningful to describe stellar luminosities ness to describe the luminosity and apparent brightness we in comparison to the Sun by using units of solar luminos- would measure if we could detect photons across the entire 26 ity: LSun 3.8 10 watts. For example, Proxima Cen- electromagnetic spectrum. (Astronomers refer to the total tauri, the nearest of the three stars in the Alpha Centauri luminosity as the bolometric luminosity.) system and hence the nearest star besides our Sun, is only about 0.0006 times as luminous as the Sun, or 0.0006L . Sun Measuring Distance Through Stellar Parallax Betelgeuse, the bright left-shoulder star of Orion, has a luminosity of 38,000LSun, meaning that it is 38,000 times Once we have measured a star’s apparent brightness, the more luminous than the Sun. next step in determining its luminosity is to measure its distance. The most direct way to measure the distances Measuring Apparent Brightness to stars is with stellar parallax, the small annual shifts in a star’s apparent position caused by Earth’s motion around We can measure a star’s apparent brightness by using a the Sun [Section 2.6]. detector, such as a CCD, that records how much energy Recall that you can observe parallax of your finger by strikes its light-sensitive surface each second. For example, holding it at arm’s length and looking at it alternately with such a detector would record an apparent brightness of first one eye closed and then the other. Astronomers mea- 2.7 10 8 watt per square meter from Alpha Centauri A. sure stellar parallax by comparing observations of a nearby The only difficulties involved in measuring apparent bright- star made 6 months apart (Figure 16.3). The nearby star ness are making sure the detector is properly calibrated appears to shift against the background of more distant and, for ground-based telescopes, taking into account the stars because we are observing it from two opposite points absorption of light by Earth’s atmosphere. of Earth’s orbit. The star’s parallax angle is defined as half No detector can record light of all wavelengths, so we the star’s annual back-and-forth shift. necessarily measure apparent brightness in only some small Measuring stellar parallax is difficult because stars are range of the complete spectrum. For example, the human so far away, making their parallax angles very small. Even eye is sensitive to visible light but does not respond to the nearest star, Proxima Centauri, has a parallax angle of ultraviolet or infrared photons. Thus, when we perceive only 0.77 arcsecond. For increasingly distant stars, the paral- a star’s brightness, our eyes are measuring the apparent lax angles quickly become too small to measure even with brightness only in the visible region of the spectrum. our highest-resolution telescopes. Current technology
Mathematical Insight 16.1 The Luminosity–Distance Formula
We can derive the luminosity–distance formula by extending the Example: What is the Sun’s apparent brightness as seen from idea illustrated in Figure 16.2. Suppose we are located a distance d Earth? from a star with luminosity L. The apparent brightness of the star 26 Solution: The Sun’s luminosity is LSun 3.8 10 watts, and is the power per unit area that we receive at our distance d. We Earth’s distance from the Sun is d 1.5 1011 meters. Thus, the can find this apparent brightness by imagining that we are part Sun’s apparent brightness is: of a giant sphere with radius d, similar to any one of the three L 3.8 1026 watts spheres in Figure 16.2. The surface area of this giant sphere is 4p d2, and the star’s entire luminosity L must pass through 4p d2 4p (1.5 1011 m)2 this surface area. (The surface area of any sphere is 4 radius2.) p 1.3 103 watts/m2 Thus, the apparent brightness at distance d is the power per unit area passing through the sphere: The Sun’s apparent brightness is about 1,300 watts per square meter at Earth’s distance. It is the maximum power per unit area star’s luminosity apparent brightness that could be collected by a detector on Earth that directly faces surface area of imaginary sphere the Sun, such as a solar power (or photovoltaic) cell. In reality, solar L collectors usually collect less power because Earth’s atmosphere absorbs some sunlight, particularly when it is cloudy. 4p d2 This is our luminosity–distance formula.
524 part V•Stellar Alchemy 2396_AWL_Bennett_Ch16 6/26/03 1:58 PM Page 525
distant stars By definition, the distance to an object with a parallax angle of 1 arcsecond is 1 parsec,abbreviated pc.(The word parsec comes from the words parallax and arcsecond.) With Every January, Every July, a little geometry and Figure 16.3 (see Mathematical Insight we see this: we see this: 16.2), it is possible to show that: nearby star 1 pc 3.26 light-years 3.09 1013 km
p If we use units of arcseconds for the parallax angle, a simple formula allows us to calculate distances in parsecs: d 1 d (in parsecs) p (in arcseconds) For example, the distance to a star with a parallax 1 angle of 2 arcsecond is 2 parsecs, the distance to a star with 1 AU 1 Not to scale a parallax angle of 10 arcsecond is 10 parsecs, and the dis- 1 tance to a star with a parallax angle of 100 arcsecond is July January 100 parsecs. Astronomers often express distances in par- Figure 16.3 Parallax makes the apparent position of a nearby secs or light-years interchangeably. You can convert quickly star shift back and forth with respect to distant stars over the between them by remembering that 1 pc 3.26 light-years. course of each year. If we measure the parallax angle p in arc- 1 Thus, 10 parsecs is about 32.6 light-years; 1,000 parsecs, seconds, the distance d to the star in parsecs is p. The angle in this figure is greatly exaggerated: All stars have parallax angles or 1 kiloparsec (1 kpc), is about 3,260 light-years; and 1 mil- of less than 1 arcsecond. lion parsecs, or 1 megaparsec (1 Mpc), is about 3.26 mil- lion light-years. Enough stars have measurable parallax to give us a allows us to measure parallax only for stars within a few fairly good sample of the many different types of stars. hundred light-years—not much farther than what we call For example, we know of more than 300 stars within about our local solar neighborhood in the vast, 100,000-light-year- 33 light-years (10 parsecs) of the Sun. About half are diameter Milky Way Galaxy. binary star systems consisting of two orbiting stars or
Mathematical Insight 16.2 The Parallax Formula
Here is one of several ways to derive the formula relating a star’s We need one more fact from geometry to derive the parallax distance and parallax angle. Figure 16.3 shows that the parallax formula given in the text. As long as the parallax angle, p, is small, angle p is part of a right triangle, the side opposite p is the Earth– sin p is proportional to p. For example, sin 2 is twice as large as 1 Sun distance of 1 AU, and the hypotenuse is the distance d to the sin 1 , and sin 2 is half as large as sin 1 .(You can verify these 1 object. You may recall that the sine of an angle in a right triangle examples with your calculator.) Thus, if we use 2 instead of 1 for is the length of its opposite side divided by the length of the the parallax angle in the formula above, we get a distance of 2 pc 1 hypotenuse. In this case, we find: instead of 1 pc. Similarly, if we use a parallax angle of 10 ,we get a distance of 10 pc. Generalizing, we get the simple parallax for- length of opposite side 1AU sin p mula given in the text: length of hypotenuse d 1 If we solve for d, the formula becomes: d (in parsecs) p (in arcseconds) 1 AU d Example: Sirius, the brightest star in our night sky, has a mea- sin p sured parallax angle of 0.379 .How far away is Sirius in parsecs? By definition, 1 parsec is the distance to an object with In light-years? a parallax angle of 1 arcsecond (1 ), or 1/3,600 degree (be- Solution: From the formula, the distance to Sirius in parsecs is: cause that 1° 60 and 1 60 ). Substituting these numbers into the parallax formula and using a calculator to find that 1 d (in pc) 2.64 pc sin 1 4.84814 10 6,we get: 0.379 1 AU 1 AU Because 1 pc 3.26 light-years, this distance is equivalent to: 1 pc 206,265 AU 6 sin 1 4.84814 10 light-years 2.64 pc 3.26 8.60 light-years That is, 1 parsec 206,265 AU, which is equivalent to 3.09 pc 1013 km or 3.26 light-years. (Recall that 1 AU 149.6 million km.)
chapter 16 • Properties of Stars 525 2396_AWL_Bennett_Ch16 6/26/03 1:58 PM Page 526
multiple star systems containing three or more stars. Most magnitudes, and a few bright stars have apparent magni- are tiny, dim red stars such as Proxima Centauri—so dim tudes less than 1—which means brighter than magnitude 1. that we cannot see them with the naked eye, despite the For example, the brightest star in the night sky, Sirius, has fact that they are relatively close. A few nearby stars, such an apparent magnitude of 1.46. Appendix F gives the ap- as Sirius (2.6 parsecs), Vega (8 parsecs), Altair (5 parsecs), parent magnitudes and solar luminosities for nearby stars and Fomalhaut (7 parsecs), are white in color and bright and the brightest stars. in our sky, but most of the brightest stars in the sky lie far- The modern magnitude system also defines absolute ther away. Because so many nearby stars appear dim while magnitudes as a way of describing stellar luminosities. A many more distant stars appear bright, their luminosities star’s absolute magnitude is the apparent magnitude it must span a wide range. would have if it were at a distance of 10 parsecs from Earth. For example, the Sun’s absolute magnitude is about 4.8, The Magnitude System meaning that the Sun would have an apparent magnitude of 4.8 if it were 10 parsecs away from us—bright enough Many amateur and professional astronomers describe stellar to be visible, but not conspicuous, on a dark night. brightness using the ancient magnitude system devised by Understanding the magnitude system is worthwhile the Greek astronomer Hipparchus (c. 190–120 B.C.). The because it is still commonly used. However, for the cal- magnitude system originally classified stars according to how culations in this book, it’s much easier to work with the bright they look to our eyes—the only instruments avail- luminosity–distance formula, so we will avoid using able in ancient times. The brightest stars received the desig- magnitude formulas in this book. nation “first magnitude,”the next brightest “second magni- ypla om ce n . o c r o
t m
tude,”and so on. The faintest visible stars were magnitude 6. s
a The Hertzsprung–Russell Diagram Tutorial, Lessons 1–3 We call these descriptions apparent magnitudes because they compare how bright different stars appear in the sky. Star charts (such as those in Appendix J) often use dots of 16.3 Stellar Surface Temperature different sizes to represent the apparent magnitudes of stars. The second basic property of stars (besides luminosity) In modern times, the magnitude system has been ex- needed for modern stellar classification is surface tempera- tended and more precisely defined (see Mathematical In- ture. Measuring a star’s surface temperature is somewhat sight 16.3). As a result, stars can have fractional apparent easier than measuring its luminosity because the measure-
Mathematical Insight 16.3 The Modern Magnitude Scale
The modern magnitude system is defined so that each difference Solution: We imagine that our eye sees “Star 1” with magnitude 5 of 5 magnitudes corresponds to a factor of exactly 100 in bright- and the telescope detects “Star 2” with magnitude 30. Then we ness. For example, a magnitude 1 star is 100 times brighter than compare: a magnitude 6 star, and a magnitude 3 star is 100 times brighter apparent brightness of Star 1 than a magnitude 8 star. Because 5 magnitudes corresponds to a (1001/5)30 5 (1001/5)25 factor of 100 in brightness, a single magnitude corresponds to a apparent brightness of Star 2 factor of (100)1/5 2.512. 1005 1010 The following formula summarizes the relationship between 10 stars of different magnitudes: The magnitude 5 star is 10 ,or 10 billion, times brighter than the magnitude 30 star, so the telescope is 10 billion times more sensi- apparent brightness of Star 1 m m tive than the human eye. (1001/5) 2 1 apparent brightness of Star 2 Example 2: The Sun has an absolute magnitude of about 4.8. Polaris, the North Star, has an absolute magnitude of 3.6. where m1 and m2 are the apparent magnitudes of Stars 1 and 2, respectively. If we replace the apparent magnitudes with absolute How much more luminous is Polaris than the Sun? magnitudes (designated M instead of m), the same formula ap- Solution: We use Polaris as Star 1 and the Sun as Star 2: plies to stellar luminosities: luminosity of Polaris (1001/5)4.8 ( 3.6) (1001/5)8.4 luminosity of Star 1 (1001/5)M 2 M1 luminosity of Sun luminosity of Star 2 1001.7 2,500 Example 1: On a clear night, stars dimmer than magnitude 5 are Polaris is about 2,500 times more luminous than the Sun. quite difficult to see. Today, sensitive instruments on large tele- scopes can detect objects as faint as magnitude 30. How much more sensitive are such telescopes than the human eye?
526 part V•Stellar Alchemy 2396_AWL_Bennett_Ch16 6/26/03 1:58 PM Page 527
Figure 16.4 This Hubble Space Telescope view through the heart of our Milky Way Galaxy reveals that stars emit light of many different colors. VIS
ment is not affected by the star’s distance. Instead, we de- Spectral Type termine surface temperature directly from the star’s color or spectrum. One note of caution: We can measure only a The emission and absorption lines in a star’s spectrum star’s surface temperature, not its interior temperature. (In- provide an independent and more accurate way to measure terior temperatures are calculated with theoretical models its surface temperature. Stars displaying spectral lines of highly ionized elements must be fairly hot, while stars dis- [Section 15.3].) When astronomers speak of the “tempera- ture” of a star, they usually mean the surface temperature playing spectral lines of molecules must be relatively cool unless they say otherwise. [Section 6.4].Astronomers classify stars according to surface A star’s surface temperature determines the color of temperature by assigning a spectral type determined from the spectral lines present in a star’s spectrum. light it emits [Section 6.4].A red star is cooler than a yellow star, which in turn is cooler than a blue star. The naked The hottest stars, with the bluest colors, are called spec- eye can distinguish colors only for the brightest stars, but tral type O, followed in order of declining surface tempera- colors become more evident when we view stars through ture by spectral types B, A, F, G, K, and M. The time-honored binoculars or a telescope (Figure 16.4). mnemonic for remembering this sequence, OBAFGKM, Astronomers can determine the “color” of a star more is “Oh Be A Fine Girl/Guy, Kiss Me!” Table 16.1 summarizes precisely by comparing its apparent brightness as viewed the characteristics of each spectral type. Each spectral type is subdivided into numbered sub- through two different filters [Section 7.3].For example, a cool star such as Betelgeuse, with a surface temperature of about categories (e.g., B0, B1,...,B9). The larger the number, the 3,400 K, emits more red light than blue light and therefore cooler the star. For example, the Sun is designated spectral looks much brighter when viewed through a red filter than type G2, which means it is slightly hotter than a G3 star but when viewed through a blue filter. In contrast, a hotter star cooler than a G1 star. such as Sirius, with a surface temperature of about 9,400 K, emits more blue light than red light and looks brighter through a blue filter than through a red filter.
chapter 16 • Properties of Stars 527 2396_AWL_Bennett_Ch16 6/26/03 1:58 PM Page 528
THINK ABOUT IT Table 16.1 The Spectral Sequence Invent your own mnemonic for the OBAFGKM sequence. To help get you thinking, here are two examples: (1) Only Bungling Spectral Temperature Astronomers Forget Generally Known Mnemonics; and (2) Only Type Example(s) Range Business Acts For Good, Karl Marx. O Stars of >30,000 K Orion’s Belt History of the Spectral Sequence You may wonder why the spectral types follow the peculiar BRigel 30,000 K–10,000 K order of OBAFGKM. The answer lies in the history of stel- lar spectroscopy. Astronomical research never paid well, and many astron- ASirius 10,000 K–7,500 K omers of the 1800s were able to do research only because of family wealth. One such astronomer was Henry Draper (1837–1882), an early pioneer of stellar spectroscopy. After FPolaris 7,500 K–6,000 K Draper died in 1882, his widow made a series of large do- nations to Harvard College Observatory for the purpose of building upon his work. The observatory director, Edward GSun, Alpha 6,000 K–5,000 K Pickering (1846–1919), used the gifts to improve the facili- Centauri A ties and to hire numerous assistants, whom he called “com- puters.”Pickering added money of his own, as did other KArcturus 5,000 K–3,500 K wealthy donors. Most of Pickering’s hired computers were women who had studied physics or astronomy at women’s colleges such as Wellesley and Radcliffe. Women had few opportunities to MBetelgeuse, <3,500 K Proxima advance in science at the time. Harvard, for example, did not Centauri allow women as either students or faculty. Pickering’s project of studying and classifying stellar spectra provided plenty of work and opportunity for his computers, and many of the Harvard Observatory women ended up among the most prominent astronomers of the late 1800s and early 1900s. One of the first computers was Williamina Fleming glance. During her lifetime, she personally classified over (1857–1911). Following Pickering’s suggestion, Fleming clas- 400,000 stars. She became the first woman ever awarded an sified stellar spectra according to the strength of their hy- honorary degree by Oxford University, and in 1929 the drogen lines: type A for the strongest hydrogen lines, type B League of Women Voters named her one of the 12 greatest for slightly weaker hydrogen lines, and so on to type O, for living American women. stars with the weakest hydrogen lines. Pickering published Fleming’s classifications of more than 10,000 stars in 1890. As more stellar spectra were obtained and the spec- tra were studied in greater detail, it became clear that the classification scheme based solely on hydrogen lines was inadequate. Ultimately, the task of finding a better classifi- cation scheme fell to Annie Jump Cannon (1863–1941), who joined Pickering’s team in 1896 (Figure 16.5). Building on the work of Fleming and another of Pickering’s computers, Antonia Maury (1866–1952), Cannon soon realized that the spectral classes fell into a natural order—but not the alphabetical order determined by hydrogen lines alone. Moreover, she found that some of the original classes over- lapped others and could be eliminated. Cannon discovered that the natural sequence consisted of just a few of Picker- ing’s original classes in the order OBAFGKM and also added the subdivisions by number. Figure 16.5 Women astronomers pose with Edward Pickering Cannon became so adept that she could properly clas- at Harvard College Observatory in 1913. Annie Jump Cannon is sify a stellar spectrum with little more than a momentary fifth from the left in the back row.
528 part V•Stellar Alchemy 2396_AWL_Bennett_Ch16 6/26/03 1:58 PM Page 529
Brightest Key Absorption Wavelength Line Features (color) Typical Spectrum
Lines of ionized <97 nm hydrogen helium, weak (ultraviolet)* hydrogen lines O Lines of neutral 97–290 nm helium, moderate (ultraviolet)* B hydrogen lines Very strong 290–390 nm hydrogen lines (violet)* A
Moderate hydrogen 390–480 nm lines, moderate lines (blue)* F of ionized calcium Weak hydrogen 480–580 nm lines, strong lines (yellow) G of ionized calcium Lines of neutral and 580–830 nm K singly ionized metals, (red) some molecules
Molecular lines >830 nm M strong (infrared) ionized titanium sodium titanium calcium oxide oxide
*All stars above 6,000 K look more or less white to the human eye because they emit plenty of radiation at all visible wavelengths.
The astronomical community adopted Cannon’s levels, ionized hydrogen can neither emit nor absorb its system of stellar classification in 1910. However, no one usual specific wavelengths of light. At the other end of the at that time knew why spectra followed the OBAFGKM spectral sequence, M stars are cool enough for some par- sequence. Many astronomers guessed, incorrectly, that ticularly stable molecules to form, explaining their strong the different sets of spectral lines reflected different com- molecular absorption lines. Payne-Gaposchkin described positions for the stars. The correct answer—that all stars her work and her conclusions in a dissertation published in are made primarily of hydrogen and helium and that a star’s 1925. A later review of twentieth-century astronomy called surface temperature determines the strength of its spec- her work “undoubtedly the most brilliant Ph.D. thesis ever tral lines—was discovered by Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin written in astronomy.” (1900–1979), another woman working at Harvard ypla om ce n . o c r o
t m
Observatory. s
a The Hertzsprung–Russell Diagram Tutorial, Lessons 1–3 Relying on insights from what was then the newly develop- ing science of quantum me- 16.4 Stellar Masses chanics, Payne-Gaposchkin The most important property of a star is its mass, but stellar showed that the differences in masses are harder to measure than luminosities or surface spectral lines from star to star temperatures. The most dependable method for “weigh- merely reflected changes in the ing” a star relies on Newton’s version of Kepler’s third law ionization level of the emitting [Section 5.3].This law can be applied only when we can atoms. For example, O stars have measure both the orbital period and the average distance weak hydrogen lines because, between the stars (semimajor axis) of the orbiting star at their high surface tempera- Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin system. Thus, in most cases we can measure stellar masses tures, nearly all their hydrogen only in binary star systems in which we have determined is ionized. Without an electron to “jump” between energy the orbital properties of the two stars.
chapter 16 • Properties of Stars 529 2396_AWL_Bennett_Ch16 6/26/03 1:58 PM Page 530
Mizar is a visual binary. Alcor Mizar B
Mizar Spectroscopy shows that each of the visual “stars” is itself a binary.
Mizar A
Figure 16.6 Mizar looks like one star to the naked eye but is actually a system of four stars. Through a telescope Mizar appears to be a visual binary made up of two stars, Mizar A and Mizar B, that gradually change positions, indicating that they orbit every few thousand years. However, each of these two “stars” is actually a spectroscopic binary, making a total of four stars. (The star Alcor appears very close to Mizar to the naked eye but does not orbit it.)
A
B
1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 Figure 16.7 Each frame represents the relative positions of Sirius A and Sirius B at 10-year intervals from 1900 to 1970. The back-and-forth “wobble” of Sirius A allowed astronomers to infer the existence of Sirius B even before the two stars could be resolved in telescopic photos.
Types of Binary Star Systems sky as if it were a member of a visual binary, but its companion is too dim to be seen. For example, slow About half of all stars orbit a companion star of some kind. shifts in the position of Sirius, the brightest star in the These star systems fall into three classes: sky, revealed it to be a binary star long before its com- panion was discovered (Figure 16.7). ● A visual binary is a pair of stars that we can see dis- tinctly (with a telescope) as the stars orbit each other. ● An eclipsing binary is a pair of stars that orbit in the Mizar, the second star in the handle of the Big Dipper, plane of our line of sight (Figure 16.8). When neither is one example of a visual binary (Figure 16.6). Some- star is eclipsed, we see the combined light of both stars. times we observe a star slowly shifting position in the When one star eclipses the other, the apparent bright-
We see light We see light We see light We see light from both from all of B, from both only from A. A and B. some of A. A and B.
B B
B
A AA A
Figure 16.8 The apparent brightness of brightness apparent an eclipsing binary system drops when either star eclipses the other. time
530 part V•Stellar Alchemy 2396_AWL_Bennett_Ch16 6/26/03 1:58 PM Page 531
ness of the system drops because some of the light is Star B spectrum at time 1: 1 blocked from our view. A light curve, or graph of ap- approaching, therefore blueshifted approaching us parent brightness against time, reveals the pattern of B the eclipses. The most famous example of an eclipsing binary is Algol, the “demon star” in the constellation Perseus (algol is Arabic for “the ghoul”). Algol becomes to Earth A three times dimmer for a few hours about every 3 days as the brighter of its two stars is eclipsed by its dimmer companion. ● If a binary system is neither visual nor eclipsing, we B may be able to detect its binary nature by observing 2 Doppler shifts in its spectral lines [Section 6.5].Such Star B spectrum at time 2: receding from us systems are called spectroscopic binary systems. If one receding, therefore redshifted star is orbiting another, it periodically moves toward Figure 16.9 The spectral lines of a star in a binary system are us and away from us in its orbit. Its spectral lines show alternately blueshifted as it comes toward us in its orbit and red- shifted as it moves away from us. blueshifts and redshifts as a result of this motion (Fig- ure 16.9). Sometimes we see two sets of lines shifting back and forth—one set from each of the two stars Measuring Masses in Binary Systems in the system (a double-lined spectroscopic binary). Other times we see a set of shifting lines from only one Even for a binary system, we can apply Newton’s version of star because its companion is too dim to be detected Kepler’s third law only if we can measure both the orbital (a single-lined spectroscopic binary). Each of the two period and the separation of the two stars. Measuring orbital stars in the visual binary Mizar is itself a spectroscopic period is fairly easy. In a visual binary, we simply observe binary (see Figure 16.6). how long each orbit takes (or extrapolate from part of an
Orbital Separation and Newton’s Version Mathematical Insight 16.4 of Kepler’s Third Law
Measurements of stellar masses rely on Newton’s version of Kep- Star 2. What are the masses of the two stars? Assume that each of ler’s third law [Section 5.3],for which we need to know the orbital the two stars traces a circular orbit around their center of mass. period p and semimajor axis a. As described in the text, it’s gen- Solution: We will find the masses by using Newton’s version of erally easy to measure p for binary star systems. We can rarely Kepler’s third law, solved for the masses: measure a directly, but we can calculate it in cases in which we 4p2 4p2 a3 can measure the orbital velocity of one star relative to the other. p2 a3 ⇒ (M M ) 1 2 2 If we assume that the first star traces a circle of radius a G(M1 M2) G p around its companion, the circumference of its orbit is 2pa. Be- We are given the orbital period p 6.2 107 s, and we find the cause the star makes one circuit of this circumference in one orbital semimajor axis a of the system from the given orbital velocity v: period p, its velocity relative to its companion is: 7 pv (6.2 10 s) (100,000 m/s) distance traveled in one orbit 2pa a v 2p 2p period of one orbit p 9.9 1011 m Solving for a, we find: Now we calculate the sum of the stellar masses by substituting the pv values of p, a, and the gravitational constant G [Section 5.3] a into 2p the mass equation above: 4 2 (9.9 1011 m)3 Once we know both p and a, we can use Newton’s version p (M1 M2) 3 7 2 of Kepler’s third law to calculate the sum of the masses of the two m (6.2 10 s) 6.67 10 11 stars (M1 M2). We can then calculate the individual masses kg s2 of the two stars by taking advantage of the fact that the relative 32 velocities of the two stars around their common center of mass 1.5 10 kg are inversely proportional to their relative masses. Because the lines of Star 1 shift twice as far as those of Star 2, Example: The spectral lines of two stars in a particular eclipsing we know that Star 1 moves twice as fast as Star 2, and hence that binary system shift back and forth with a period of 2 years (p Star 1 is half as massive as Star 2. In other words, Star 2 is twice 6.2 107 seconds). The lines of one star (Star 1) shift twice as far as massive as Star 1. Using this fact and their combined mass of as the lines of the other (Star 2). The amount of Doppler shift 1.5 1032 kg, we conclude that the mass of Star 2 is 1.0 1032 kg indicates an orbital speed of v 100,000 m/s for Star 1 relative to and the mass of Star 1 is 0.5 1032 kg.
chapter 16 • Properties of Stars 531 2396_AWL_Bennett_Ch16 6/26/03 1:58 PM Page 532
orbit). In an eclipsing binary, we measure the time between Hertzsprung and Russell based their diagrams on the eclipses. In a spectroscopic binary, we measure the time it spectral sequence OBAFGKM. takes the spectral lines to shift back and forth. ● The vertical axis represents stellar luminosity, in units Determining the average separation of the stars in a of the Sun’s luminosity (L ). Stellar luminosities binary system is usually much more difficult. Except in rare Sun span a wide range, so we keep the graph compact by cases in which we can measure the separation directly, we can making each tick mark represent a luminosity 10 times calculate the separation only if we know the actual orbital larger than the prior tick mark. speeds of the stars from their Doppler shifts. Unfortunately, a Doppler shift tells us only the portion of a star’s velocity Each location on the diagram represents a unique that is directly toward us or away from us [Section 6.5].Be- combination of spectral type and luminosity. For example, cause orbiting stars generally do not move directly along the dot representing the Sun in Figure 16.10 corresponds our line of sight, their actual velocities can be significantly to the Sun’s spectral type, G2, and its luminosity, 1LSun. greater than those we measure through the Doppler effect. Because luminosity increases upward on the diagram and The exceptions are eclipsing binary stars. Because these surface temperature increases leftward, stars near the upper stars orbit in the plane of our line of sight, their Doppler left are hot and luminous. Similarly, stars near the upper shifts can tell us their true orbital velocities.* Eclipsing right are cool and luminous, stars near the lower right are binaries are therefore particularly important to the study cool and dim, and stars near the lower left are hot and dim. of stellar masses. As an added bonus, eclipsing binaries allow us to measure stellar radii directly. Because we know THINK ABOUT IT how fast the stars are moving across our line of sight as one eclipses the other, we can determine their radii by timing Explain how the colors of the stars in Figure 16.10 help indi- how long each eclipse lasts. cate stellar surface temperature. Do these colors tell us anything about interior temperatures? Why or why not?
THINK ABOUT IT The H–R diagram also provides direct information Suppose two orbiting stars are moving in a plane perpendicular about stellar radii, because a star’s luminosity depends on to our line of sight. Would the spectral features of these stars both its surface temperature and its surface area or radius. appear shifted in any way? Explain. Recall that surface temperature determines the amount ypla om ce n . o c r o
t m
s of power emitted by the star per unit area: Higher tempera-
a The Hertzsprung–Russell Diagram Tutorial, Lessons 1–3 ture means greater power output per unit area [Section 6.4]. Thus, if two stars have the same surface temperature, one 16.5 The Hertzsprung–Russell can be more luminous than the other only if it is larger in Diagram size. Stellar radii therefore must increase as we go from the high-temperature, low-luminosity corner on the lower left During the first decade of the twentieth century, a similar of the H–R diagram to the low-temperature, high-luminosity thought occurred independently to astronomers Ejnar Hertz- corner on the upper right. sprung, working in Denmark, and Henry Norris Russell, working in the United States at Princeton University: Each decided to make a graph plotting stellar luminosities on one Patterns in the H–R Diagram axis and spectral types on the other. Such graphs are now Figure 16.10 also shows that stars do not fall randomly called Hertzsprung–Russell (H–R) diagrams.Soon after throughout the H–R diagram but instead fall into several they began making their graphs, Hertzsprung and Russell distinct groups: uncovered some previously unsuspected patterns in the prop- erties of stars. As we will see shortly, understanding these ● Most stars fall somewhere along the main sequence, patterns and the H–R diagram is central to the study of stars. the prominent streak running from the upper left to the lower right on the H–R diagram. Our Sun is a main- A Basic H–R Diagram sequence star. ● The stars along the top are called supergiants because Figure 16.10 displays an example of an H–R diagram. they are very large in addition to being very bright. ● The horizontal axis represents stellar surface tempera- ● Just below the supergiants are the giants,which are ture, which, as we’ve discussed, corresponds to spectral somewhat smaller in radius and lower in luminosity type. Temperature increases from right to left because (but still much larger and brighter than main- sequence stars of the same spectral type). *In other binaries, we can calculate an actual orbital velocity from the ● velocity obtained by the Doppler effect if we also know the system’s orbital The stars near the lower left are small in radius and inclination. Astronomers have developed techniques for determining appear white in color because of their high tempera- orbital inclination in a relatively small number of cases. ture. We call these stars white dwarfs.
532 part V•Stellar Alchemy 2396_AWL_Bennett_Ch16 6/26/03 1:59 PM Page 533
When classifying a star, astronomers generally report sequence stars, and luminosity classes II and IV are inter- both the star’s spectral type and a luminosity class that mediate to the others. For example, the complete spectral describes the region of the H–R diagram in which the star classification of our Sun is G2 V. The G2 spectral type means falls. Table 16.2 summarizes the luminosity classes: Lumi- it is yellow in color, and the luminosity class V means it is nosity class I represents supergiants, luminosity class III a main-sequence star. Betelgeuse is M2 I, making it a red represents giants, luminosity class V represents main- supergiant. Proxima Centauri is M5 V—similar in color and
10 2 10 3 Solar Radii Solar Radii 10 6 60MSun 30M 10 Solar Radii Sun Deneb
10 5 Centauri Rigel SUPERGIANTS Spica Canopus Betelgeuse Lifetime 10M 4 Sun 10 10 7 yrs Bellatrix Antares 1 Solar Radius Polaris 3 10 MAIN 6MSun Achernar GIANTS
Lifetime SEQUENCE Aldebaran 8 3M Arcturus 10 2 10 yrs Sun Vega Pollux 0.1 Solar Radius Sirius Procyon 10 1.5M Altair Sun Lifetime Centauri A 10 9 yrs 1 Sun 1MSun Centauri B Eridani Sirius Ceti luminosity (solar units) 10 2 Solar Radius 61 Cygni A 0.1 61 Cygni B Lifetime Lacaille 9352 10 10 yrs 0.3MSun Gliese 725 A Sirius B 10 2 WHITE Gliese 725 B 0.1M DWARFS Lifetime Barnard’s Star Sun 10 3 11 Ross 128 Solar Radius 10 yrs 10 3 Wolf 359 Proxima Centauri Procyon B DX Cancri
10 4
10 5
30,000 10,000 6,000 3,000 increasing temperature surface temperature (Kelvin) decreasing temperature
Figure 16.10 An H–R diagram, one of astronomy’s most important tools, shows how the surface tem- peratures of stars (plotted along the horizontal axis) relate to their luminosities (plotted along the ver- tical axis). Several of the brightest stars in the sky are plotted here, along with a few of those closest to Earth. They are not drawn to scale—the diagonal lines, labeled in solar radii, indicate how large they are compared to the Sun. The lifetime and mass labels apply only to main-sequence stars (see Figure 16.11). (Star positions on this diagram are based on data from the Hipparcos satellite.)
chapter 16 • Properties of Stars 533 2396_AWL_Bennett_Ch16 6/26/03 1:59 PM Page 534
surface temperature to Betelgeuse, but far dimmer because Table 16.2 Stellar Luminosity Classes of its much smaller size. White dwarfs are usually designated with the letters wd rather than with a Roman numeral. Class Description
ISupergiants The Main Sequence II Bright giants The common trait of main-sequence stars is that, like our III Giants Sun, they are fusing hydrogen into helium in their cores. Because stars spend the majority of their lives fusing hydro- IV Subgiants gen, most stars fall somewhere along the main sequence VMain sequence of the H–R diagram. Why do main-sequence stars span such a wide range of luminosities and surface temperatures? By measuring the masses of stars in binary systems, astronomers have dis- The nuclear burning rate, and hence the luminosity, is very covered that stellar masses decrease downward along the sensitive to mass. For example, a 10MSun star on the main main sequence (Figure 16.11). At the upper end of the main sequence is about 10,000 times more luminous than the Sun. sequence, the hot, luminous O stars can have masses as The relationship between mass and surface tempera- high as 100 times that of the Sun (100MSun). On the lower ture is a little subtler. In general, a very luminous star must end, cool, dim M stars may have as little as 0.08 times the either be very large or have a very high surface tempera- mass of the Sun (0.08MSun). Many more stars fall on the ture, or some combination of both. Stars on the upper end lower end of the main sequence than on the upper end, of the main sequence are thousands of times more lumi- which tells us that low-mass stars are much more common nous than the Sun but only about 10 times larger than the than high-mass stars. Sun in radius. Thus, their surfaces must be significantly The orderly arrangement of stellar masses along the hotter than the Sun’s surface to account for their high lu- main sequence tells us that mass is the most important minosities. Main-sequence stars more massive than the attribute of a hydrogen-burning star. Luminosity depends Sun therefore have higher surface temperatures than the directly on mass because the weight of a star’s outer layers Sun, and those less massive than the Sun have lower sur- determines the nuclear burning rate in its core. More weight face temperatures. That is why the main sequence slices means the star must sustain a higher nuclear burning rate diagonally from the upper left to the lower right on the in order to maintain gravitational equilibrium [Section 15.3]. H–R diagram.
Mathematical Insight 16.5 Calculating Stellar Radii