DOCSLIB.ORG

November 2013 Polaris Metals Pty Ltd J4 Mine and Haul

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
November 2013 Polaris Metals Pty Ltd J4 Mine and Haul NOVEMBER 2013 POLARIS METALS PTY LTD J4 MINE AND HAUL ROAD TERRESTRIAL AND SUBTERRANEAN FAUNA ASSESSMENT Polaris Metals Pty Ltd J4 Mine and Haul Road Terrestrial and Subterranean Fauna Assessment This page has been left blank intentionally November 2013 i Polaris Metals Pty Ltd J4 Mine and Haul Road Terrestrial and Subterranean Fauna Assessment Document Status Approved for Issue Rev Author/s Reviewer/s Date Name Distribute to Date 0 A Heidrich D. Cancilla 25/11/13 K. Bauer‐Simpson J. Hesford 26/11/13 C Knuckey D. Temple‐Smith ecologia Environment (2013). Reproduction of this report in whole or in part by electronic, mechanical or chemical means, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, in any language, is strictly prohibited without the express approval of Polaris Metals NL and ecologia Environment. Restrictions on Use This report has been prepared specifically for Polaris Metals NL. Neither the report nor its contents may be referred to or quoted in any statement, study, report, application, prospectus, loan, or other agreement document (with the exception of when this document is required to be publicly released as part of a statutory approval process), without the express approval of Polaris Metals NL and ecologia Environment. ecologia Environment 1025 Wellington Street WEST PERTH WA 6005 Phone: 08 9322 1944 Fax: 08 9322 1599 Email: [email protected] November 2013 i Polaris Metals Pty Ltd J4 Mine and Haul Road Terrestrial and Subterranean Fauna Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... IX 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................ 1 1.2 LEGISLATION AND POLICY ......................................................................................................... 3 1.3 SURVEY OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................. 5 1.4 BACKGROUND SUMMARY OF FAUNAL GROUPS ...................................................................... 5 2 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT .................................................................................................. 9 2.1 CLIMATE .................................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 BIOGEOGRAPHY, GEOLOGY AND SOILS ..................................................................................10 2.3 HYDROGEOLOGY .....................................................................................................................15 2.4 PREVIOUS SURVEYS ................................................................................................................15 3 METHODS ....................................................................................................................... 27 3.1 DETERMINATION OF SURVEY SAMPLING DESIGN AND INTENSITY ........................................27 3.2 STUDY TEAM ...........................................................................................................................28 3.3 SURVEY TIMING ......................................................................................................................29 3.4 SITE SELECTION .......................................................................................................................29 3.5 FAUNA HABITAT MAPPING ....................................................................................................37 3.6 SAMPLING TECHNIQUES .........................................................................................................37 3.7 SURVEY EFFORT SUMMARY ....................................................................................................47 3.8 DATA ANALYSIS .......................................................................................................................49 3.9 LIKELIHOOD OF OCCURRENCE OF CONSERVATION SIGNIFICANT FAUNA ..............................50 3.10 DETERMINING SRE STATUS .....................................................................................................51 3.11 TAXONOMY AND NOMENCLATURE OF VERTEBRATE FAUNA ................................................53 3.12 TAXONOMY AND NOMENCLATURE OF INVERTEBRATE FAUNA .............................................53 3.13 ANIMAL ETHICS .......................................................................................................................53 4 RESULTS .......................................................................................................................... 55 4.1 FAUNA HABITATS ....................................................................................................................55 4.2 FAUNA HABITAT ANALYSIS .....................................................................................................62 4.3 FAUNA ASSEMBLAGE ..............................................................................................................64 4.4 SURVEY ADEQUACY ................................................................................................................82 5 DISCUSSION .................................................................................................................... 87 5.1 HABITATS AND ASSOCIATED FAUNA ......................................................................................87 November 2013 ii Polaris Metals Pty Ltd J4 Mine and Haul Road Terrestrial and Subterranean Fauna Assessment 5.2 FAUNA HABITAT ANALYSIS .....................................................................................................91 5.3 FAUNA ASSEMBLAGE ..............................................................................................................92 5.4 SURVEY ADEQUACY ............................................................................................................. 133 5.5 SURVEY LIMITATIONS AND CONSTRAINTS .......................................................................... 133 6 IMPACTS TO FAUNA HABITATS AND ASSEMBLAGES ...................................................... 135 6.1 THREATENING PROCESSES ................................................................................................... 135 6.2 IMPACTS ON FAUNA HABITATS ........................................................................................... 137 6.3 IMPACTS ON FAUNAL ASSEMBLAGES .................................................................................. 137 7 CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................................. 139 8 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 141 November 2013 iii Polaris Metals Pty Ltd J4 Mine and Haul Road Terrestrial and Subterranean Fauna Assessment TABLES Table 2.1 – Rainfall averages for Southern Cross weather station (BoM 2013a) .................................... 9 Table 2.2 – Vegetation Association of the impact area .........................................................................11 Table 2.3 – Vegetation units within the impact area .............................................................................11 Table 2.4 – Geology of the impact area .................................................................................................14 Table 2.5 – Fauna databases ..................................................................................................................15 Table 2.6 – Previous biological survey reports within 35 km of the impact area ..................................16 Table 2.7 – Waterbirds with very low likelihood to occur within the impact area ................................17 Table 2.8 – Potential SRE species recorded from previous surveys .......................................................19 Table 2.9 – Troglofauna potentially occuring within the impact area ...................................................20 Table 3.1 – Factors likely to influence survey design (EPA 2004) ..........................................................27 Table 3.2 – Experience and qualifications of staff involved in the survey .............................................28 Table 3.3 – External specialists used for identification of select groups ...............................................28 Table 3.4 – Summary of survey timing and duration .............................................................................29 Table 3.5 – Previous survey Troglofauna trapping methodology ..........................................................30 Table 3.6 – Survey effort per sampling technique .................................................................................38 Table 3.7 – Activity of Malleefowl mounds as published by Malleefowl Preservation Group ..............42 Table 3.8 – Survey effort for Subterranean fauna .................................................................................44 Table 3.9 – Survey effort for conservation significant fauna .................................................................48 Table 3.10 – Likelihood of occurrence categories ..................................................................................50 Table 3.11 – Western Australian Museum
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Tales of Two Geckos: Does Dispersal Prevent Extinction In
    Molecular Ecology (2007) 16, 3299–3312 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03352.x TheBlackwell Publishing Ltd tales of two geckos: does dispersal prevent extinction in recently fragmented populations? M. HOEHN,*† S. D. SARRE† and K. HENLE* *Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research — UFZ, Department of Conservation Biology, Permoserstrasse 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany, †Applied Ecology Research Group, University of Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia Abstract Although habitat loss and fragmentation threaten species throughout the world and are a major threat to biodiversity, it is apparent that some species are at greater risk of extinction in fragmented landscapes than others. Identification of these species and the characteristics that make them sensitive to habitat fragmentation has important implications for conser- vation management. Here, we present a comparative study of the population genetic structure of two arboreal gecko species (Oedura reticulata and Gehyra variegata) in fragmented and continuous woodlands. The species differ in their level of persistence in remnant vegetation patches (the former exhibiting a higher extinction rate than the latter). Previous demographic and modelling studies of these two species have suggested that their difference in persistence levels may be due, in part, to differences in dispersal abilities with G. variegata expected to have higher dispersal rates than O. reticulata. We tested this hypothesis and genotyped a total of 345 O. reticulata from 12 sites and 353 G. variegata from 13 sites at nine micro- satellite loci. We showed that O. reticulata exhibits elevated levels of structure (FST = 0.102 vs. 0.044), lower levels of genetic diversity (HE = 0.79 vs. 0.88), and fewer misassignments (20% vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Eg the Short Range-Endemics of the Pilbara Bioregion
    Appendix 3 Supporting Technical Studies Earl Grey Lithium Project SRE and Subterranean Fauna Desktop Assessment Prepared for: Covalent Lithium January 2019 Final Report May 2017 Earl Grey SRE & Subterranean Fauna Kidman Resources Ltd Earl Grey Lithium Project SRE and Subterranean Fauna Desktop Assessment Bennelongia Pty Ltd 5 Bishop Street Jolimont WA 6014 P: (08) 9285 8722 F: (08) 9285 8811 E: [email protected] ABN: 55 124 110 167 Report Number: 298 Report Version Prepared by Reviewed by Submitted to Client Method Date Draft Anton Mittra Stuart Halse Email 31 May 2017 Final Stuart Halse Email 24 November 17 Final V2 Anton Mittra Email 14 January 2019 BEC_Mt Holland_SRE_final_V2_10i2019.docx This document has been prepared to the requirements of the Client and is for the use by the Client, its agents, and Bennelongia Environmental Consultants. Copyright and any other Intellectual Property associated with the document belongs to Bennelongia Environmental Consultants and may not be reproduced without written permission of the Client or Bennelongia. No liability or responsibility is accepted in respect of any use by a third party or for purposes other than for which the document was commissioned. Bennelongia has not attempted to verify the accuracy and completeness of information supplied by the Client. © Copyright 2015 Bennelongia Pty Ltd. i Earl Grey SRE & Subterranean Fauna Kidman Resources Ltd EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Covalent Lithium proposes to mine lithium at the Earl Grey deposit (the Proposal) approximately 100 km southeast of Southern Cross in Western Australia. This desktop review examines the likelihood that short-range endemic (SRE) invertebrates and listed terrestrial invertebrate species occur in the Proposal area and whether these species are likely to be impacted by proposed development.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Society of Herpetologists
    1 THE AUSTRALIAN SOCIETY OF HERPETOLOGISTS INCORPORATED NEWSLETTER 48 Published 29 October 2014 2 Letter from the editor This letter finds itself far removed from last year’s ASH conference, held in Point Wolstoncroft, New South Wales. Run by Frank Lemckert and Michael Mahony and their team of froglab strong, the conference featured some new additions including the hospitality suite (as inspired by the Turtle Survival Alliance conference in Tuscon, Arizona though sadly lacking of the naked basketball), egg and goon race and bouncing castle (Simon’s was a deprived childhood), as well as the more traditional elements of ASH such as the cricket match and Glenn Shea’s trivia quiz. May I just add that Glenn Shea wowed everyone with his delightful skin tight, anatomically correct, and multi-coloured, leggings! To the joy of everybody in the world, the conference was opened by our very own Hal Cogger (I love you Hal). Plenary speeches were given by Dale Roberts, Lin Schwarzkopf and Gordon Grigg and concurrent sessions were run about all that is cutting edge in science and herpetology. Of note, award winning speeches were given by Kate Hodges (Ph.D) and Grant Webster (Honours) and the poster prize was awarded to Claire Treilibs. Thank you to everyone who contributed towards an update and Jacquie Herbert for all the fantastic photos. By now I trust you are all preparing for the fast approaching ASH 2014, the 50 year reunion and set to have many treats in store. I am sad to not be able to join you all in celebrating what is sure to be, an informative and fun spectacle.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentals of Biogeography
    FUNDAMENTALS OF BIOGEOGRAPHY Fundamentals of Biogeography presents an engaging and comprehensive introduction to biogeography, explaining the ecology, geography, and history of animals and plants. Defining and explaining the nature of populations, communities and ecosystems, the book examines where different animals and plants live and how they came to be living there; investigates how populations grow, interact, and survive, and how communities are formed and change; and predicts the shape of communities in the twenty-first century. Illustrated throughout with informative diagrams and attractive photos (many in colour), and including guides to further reading, chapter summaries, and an extensive glossary of key terms, Fundamentals of Biogeography clearly explains key concepts, life systems, and interactions. The book also tackles the most topical and controversial environmental and ethical concerns including: animal rights, species exploitation, habitat fragmentation, biodiversity, metapopulations, patchy landscapes, and chaos. Fundamentals of Biogeography presents an appealing introduction for students and all those interested in gaining a deeper understanding of the key topics and debates within the fields of biogeography, ecology and the environment. Revealing how life has and is adapting to its biological and physical surroundings, Huggett stresses the role of ecological, geographical, historical and human factors in fashioning animal and plant distributions and raises important questions concerning how humans have altered Nature, and how biogeography can affect conservation practice. Richard John Huggett is a Senior Lecturer in Geography at the University of Manchester ROUTLEDGE FUNDAMENTALS OF PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY SERIES Series Editor: John Gerrard This new series of focused, introductory textbooks presents comprehensive, up-to-date introductions to the fundamental concepts, natural processes and human/environmental impacts within each of the core physical geography sub-disciplines: Biogeography, Climatology, Hydrology, Geomorphology and Soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Zt03383p038.Pdf
    Zootaxa 3383: 15–38 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Molecular and morphological characterisation of new species in the trapdoor spider genus Aname (Araneae: Mygalomorphae: Nemesiidae) from the Pilbara bioregion of Western Australia FRANCES S. B. HARVEY1, VOLKER W. FRAMENAU2,3,6, JANINE M. WOJCIESZEK3,7, MICHAEL G. RIX2 & MARK S. HARVEY2,3,4,5 1Shenton College, 227 Stubbs Terrace, Shenton Park, Western Australia 6008, Australia 2Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Western Australia 6986, Australia 3School of Animal Biology, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia 4 Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 49th Street, New York, NY 10024-5192, USA; and California Academy of Sciences, Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, CA 94103-3009, USA 5Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] 6Current address: Phoenix Environmental Sciences, 1/511 Wanneroo Road, Balcatta, Western Australia 6021, Australia 7Current address: School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Murdoch University, South Street, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia Abstract A study of selected species in the nemesiid spider genus Aname L. Koch, 1873 from the Pilbara bioregion of Western Aus- tralia was undertaken using molecular and morphological techniques. Bayesian and parsimony analyses of mitochondrial sequence data from the Cytochrome c Oxidase subunit I (COI) gene found evidence for four species, confirming our initial morphological examination of adult male specimens. These four species are here described as A. mellosa n.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Animal Species List
    Native animal species list Native animals in South Australia are categorised into one of four groups: • Unprotected • Exempt • Basic • Specialist. To find out the category your animal is in, please check the list below. However, Specialist animals are not listed. There are thousands of them, so we don’t carry a list. A Specialist animal is simply any native animal not listed in this document. Mammals Common name Zoological name Species code Category Dunnart Fat-tailed dunnart Sminthopsis crassicaudata A01072 Basic Dingo Wild dog Canis familiaris Not applicable Unprotected Gliders Squirrel glider Petaurus norfolcensis E04226 Basic Sugar glider Petaurus breviceps E01138 Basic Possum Common brushtail possum Trichosurus vulpecula K01113 Basic Potoroo and bettongs Brush-tailed bettong (Woylie) Bettongia penicillata ogilbyi M21002 Basic Long-nosed potoroo Potorous tridactylus Z01175 Basic Rufous bettong Aepyprymnus rufescens W01187 Basic Rodents Mitchell's hopping-mouse Notomys mitchellii Y01480 Basic Plains mouse (Rat) Pseudomys australis S01469 Basic Spinifex hopping-mouse Notomys alexis K01481 Exempt Wallabies Parma wallaby Macropus parma K01245 Basic Red-necked pademelon Thylogale thetis Y01236 Basic Red-necked wallaby Macropus rufogriseus K01261 Basic Swamp wallaby Wallabia bicolor E01242 Basic Tammar wallaby Macropus eugenii eugenii C05889 Basic Tasmanian pademelon Thylogale billardierii G01235 Basic 1 Amphibians Common name Zoological name Species code Category Southern bell frog Litoria raniformis G03207 Basic Smooth frog Geocrinia laevis
    [Show full text]
  • A Molecular Phylogenetic Study of Ecological Diversification in the Australian Lizard Genus Ctenophorus
    JEZ Mde 2035 JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ZOOLOGY (MOL DEV EVOL) 291:339–353 (2001) A Molecular Phylogenetic Study of Ecological Diversification in the Australian Lizard Genus Ctenophorus JANE MELVILLE,* JAMES A. SCHULTE II, AND ALLAN LARSON Department of Biology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130 ABSTRACT We present phylogenetic analyses of the lizard genus Ctenophorus using 1,639 aligned positions of mitochondrial DNA sequences containing 799 parsimony-informative charac- ters for samples of 22 species of Ctenophorus and 12 additional Australian agamid genera. Se- quences from three protein-coding genes (ND1, ND2, and COI) and eight intervening tRNA genes are examined using both parsimony and maximum-likelihood analyses. Species of Ctenophorus form a monophyletic group with Rankinia adelaidensis, which we suggest placing in Ctenophorus. Ecological differentiation among species of Ctenophorus is most evident in the kinds of habitats used for shelter. Phylogenetic analyses suggest that the ancestral condition is to use burrows for shelter, and that habits of sheltering in rocks and shrubs/hummock grasses represent separately derived conditions. Ctenophorus appears to have undergone extensive cladogenesis approximately 10–12 million years ago, with all three major ecological modes being established at that time. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 291:339–353, 2001. © 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc. The agamid lizard genus Ctenophorus provides ecological categories based on whether species abundant opportunity for a molecular phylogenetic shelter in rocks, burrows, or vegetation. Eight spe- study of speciation and ecological diversification. cies of Ctenophorus are associated with rocks: C. Agamid lizards show a marked radiation in Aus- caudicinctus, C. decresii, C. fionni, C.
    [Show full text]
  • A List of the Vertebrates of South Australia
    VERTEBRATES OF SOUTH AUSTRALI,A ?s BDITBD BY !líi C.H.S. WATTS ie4 l i ` er'P^{q L' C" /PA', o s VERTEBRATES OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA EDITED BY C.H.S. WATTS South Australian Museum Prepared by the curators of vertebrates at the South Australian Museum and officers of the Information Systems Branch, Department of Environment and Planning Published by the Biological Survey Coordinating Committee and the Department of Environment and Planning, South Australia. Adelaide 1990 ® Department of Environment and Planning South Australia 1990 First edition (edited by H.J. Aslin) published 1985 Second edition (edited by C.H.S. Watts) published 1990 Design and layout by Technical Services Division Department of Environment and Planning ISBN 0 7308 0482 8 Index no. 11821 Introduction 1 Environmental Provinces of South Australia 5 Mammals 7 Birds 21 Reptiles & Amphibians 55 Freshwater Fishes 69 Index of Common Names 79 Index of Generic Names 81 SYMBOLS USED Ex =Extinct 2 E = Endangered 2 V = Vulnerable 2 R= Rare 2 I = Indeterminate Status 3 C= Common (used in Mammal and Bird section only) 3 U= Uncommon (used in Mammal and Bird section only) 3 O= Occasional (used in Mammal and Bird section only) 3 * Introduced Species + = Only nominate subspecies in South Australia ()= No specimen in S.A. Museum collections # = Only recorded from artificial habitats (p.69) (Fishes only) ? = Questionable Record 1 This list includes all species of vertebrate animals reliably reported to have occurred in South Australia as free- living forms during the period of European settlement of the State. It has been prepared from a variety of published sources, (the major ones of which are cited in the various sections), and from the specimen collections held by the South Australian Museum, and, in some cases, other Australian museums.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Techniques in Bird Studies Course Report
    Field Techniques in Bird Studies Course Report Nov. 22nd – Nov 28th 2015- Lauren Gilson & Joe Porter Each year a small group of ornithologists meets at the Eyre Bird Observatory for a short course on techniques for studying birds. In 2015, course leader Tegan Douglas was presenting her own bird study results to ornithologists at the Australasian Ornithological Conference and Society for Comparative Physiology and Biochemistry conference, and so the course was led by Lauren Gilson. Bush fires almost blocked the southern migration of participants, but after determining that we would be safe from fire danger and smoke at Newman Rocks, Lauren and four of this year’s participants departed for our rendezvous with herpetologist/naturalist Joe Porter. At the Observatory, students William Oversby (supported by BirdLife WA), Angus McFarlane (supported by the Sowilo Community High School), Annika Baynham, and Hayden Ajduk were joined by former EBO caretakers/current course participants Danie and Delene van Dyk, and current EBO caretakers/former course participants, Alan and Wendy Pilkington. Wendy instructing Angus while Lauren records Surveying along Kanidal Beach Alan with Danie, Hayden & Annika The mist-netting session got everyone’s hands onto some birds, with New Holland Honeyeaters and Silvereyes volunteering in equal numbers to help train our flocks in extracting and processing captured birds. A single Blue-breasted Fairy-wren and White-browed Scrubwren provided a modicum of variety, with three Singing Honeyeaters and three Welcome Swallows completing the species list. Seven of 51 processed birds were recaptures, with most having been recently banded in the preceding months (the oldest from 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology, Life-History, and Behavior in the Australian Scincid Genus Egernia, with Comments on the Evolution of Complex Sociality in Lizards
    Herpetological Monographs, 17, 2003, 145–180 Ó 2003 by The Herpetologists’ League, Inc. ECOLOGY, LIFE-HISTORY, AND BEHAVIOR IN THE AUSTRALIAN SCINCID GENUS EGERNIA, WITH COMMENTS ON THE EVOLUTION OF COMPLEX SOCIALITY IN LIZARDS 1 DAVID G. CHAPPLE School of Botany and Zoology, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia ABSTRACT: Squamate reptiles generally have been ignored in the search for a unified theory for the evolution of sociality due to the perception that they exhibit little social behavior beyond territoriality and dominance hierarchies and display polygynous mating systems. However a growing body of research has revealed unsuspected levels of social complexity and diversity in mating systems within the squamate lineage, particularly among the members of the Australian Scincid genus Egernia. Several species of Egernia are amongst the most highly social of all squamate reptiles, exhibiting stable social aggregations and high levels of long-term social and genetic monogamy. Social complexity is widespread within the Egernia genus, with reports of social aggregations in 23 of the 30 described species. The purpose of this review was to examine the potential for the Egernia genus as a model system for study of the evolution of sociality and monogamy within squamate reptiles. Current evidence indicates there is substantial variability in social complexity both within and between species, with social organization covering the spectrum from solitary to highly social. Four highly social Egernia species are known to live in stable social aggregations consisting of closely related individuals (adults, subadults, juveniles; i.e., ‘family’ groups) that appear to utilize chemical cues to recognize group members (kin recognition).
    [Show full text]
  • A LIST of the VERTEBRATES of SOUTH AUSTRALIA
    A LIST of the VERTEBRATES of SOUTH AUSTRALIA updates. for Edition 4th Editors See A.C. Robinson K.D. Casperson Biological Survey and Research Heritage and Biodiversity Division Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia M.N. Hutchinson South Australian Museum Department of Transport, Urban Planning and the Arts, South Australia 2000 i EDITORS A.C. Robinson & K.D. Casperson, Biological Survey and Research, Biological Survey and Research, Heritage and Biodiversity Division, Department for Environment and Heritage. G.P.O. Box 1047, Adelaide, SA, 5001 M.N. Hutchinson, Curator of Reptiles and Amphibians South Australian Museum, Department of Transport, Urban Planning and the Arts. GPO Box 234, Adelaide, SA 5001updates. for CARTOGRAPHY AND DESIGN Biological Survey & Research, Heritage and Biodiversity Division, Department for Environment and Heritage Edition Department for Environment and Heritage 2000 4thISBN 0 7308 5890 1 First Edition (edited by H.J. Aslin) published 1985 Second Edition (edited by C.H.S. Watts) published 1990 Third Edition (edited bySee A.C. Robinson, M.N. Hutchinson, and K.D. Casperson) published 2000 Cover Photograph: Clockwise:- Western Pygmy Possum, Cercartetus concinnus (Photo A. Robinson), Smooth Knob-tailed Gecko, Nephrurus levis (Photo A. Robinson), Painted Frog, Neobatrachus pictus (Photo A. Robinson), Desert Goby, Chlamydogobius eremius (Photo N. Armstrong),Osprey, Pandion haliaetus (Photo A. Robinson) ii _______________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Targeted Fauna Assessment.Pdf
    APPENDIX H BORR North and Central Section Targeted Fauna Assessment (Biota, 2019) Bunbury Outer Ring Road Northern and Central Section Targeted Fauna Assessment Prepared for GHD December 2019 BORR Northern and Central Section Fauna © Biota Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 2020 ABN 49 092 687 119 Level 1, 228 Carr Place Leederville Western Australia 6007 Ph: (08) 9328 1900 Fax: (08) 9328 6138 Project No.: 1463 Prepared by: V. Ford, R. Teale J. Keen, J. King Document Quality Checking History Version: Rev A Peer review: S. Ford Director review: M. Maier Format review: S. Schmidt, M. Maier Approved for issue: M. Maier This document has been prepared to the requirements of the client identified on the cover page and no representation is made to any third party. It may be cited for the purposes of scientific research or other fair use, but it may not be reproduced or distributed to any third party by any physical or electronic means without the express permission of the client for whom it was prepared or Biota Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd. This report has been designed for double-sided printing. Hard copies supplied by Biota are printed on recycled paper. Cube:Current:1463 (BORR North Central Re-survey):Documents:1463 Northern and Central Fauna ARI_Rev0.docx 3 BORR Northern and Central Section Fauna 4 Cube:Current:1463 (BORR North Central Re-survey):Documents:1463 Northern and Central Fauna ARI_Rev0.docx BORR Northern and Central Section Fauna BORR Northern and Central Section Fauna Contents 1.0 Executive Summary 9 1.1 Introduction 9 1.2 Methods
    [Show full text]