DOCSLIB.ORG

Unrorsity ]Hten)Âtloiial

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Unrorsity ]Hten)Âtloiial U nrorsity IVficrofilnis ]hten)âtLOiial 1.0 3AA 1112.8 2.5 2.2 2.0 l.l 1.8 1.25 1.4 1.6 MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS STANDARD REFERENCE MATERIAL 1010a (ANSI and ISO TEST CHART No. 2) University Microfilms Inc. 300 N. Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106 INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a manuscript sent to us for publication and microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to pho­ tograph and reproduce this manuscript, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. Pages in any manuscript may have indistinct print. In all cases the best available copy has been filmed. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. Manuscripts may not always be complete. When it is not possible to obtain missing pages, a note appears to indicate this. 2. When copyrighted materials are removed from the manuscript, a note ap­ pears to indicate this. 3. Oversize materials (maps, drawings, and charts) are photographed by sec­ tioning the original, beginning at the upper left hand comer and continu­ ing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each oversize page is also filmed as one exposure and is available, for an additional charge, as a standard 35mm slide or in black and white paper format. * 4. Most photographs reproduce acceptably on positive microfilm or micro­ fiche but lack clarity on xerographic copies made from the microfilm. For an additional charge, all photographs are available in black and white standard 35mm slide format.* *For more information about black and white slides or enlarged paper reproductions, please contact the Dissertations Customer Services Department. ’IMversHy T Micnmhna M . IhterDadkmal 8603514 Maluf, Ram ez Bahige JEAN ANTOINE NOLLET AND EXPERIMENTAL NATURAL PHILOSOPHY IN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY FRANCE The University of Oklahoma Ph.D. 1985 University Microfilms Internetionel300 N. ze e b Road. Ann Arbor,Ml48106 Copyright 1985 by Maluf, Ramez Bahige All Rights Reserved PLEASE NOTE: In all cases this material has been filmed In the best possible way from the available copy. Problems encountered with this document have been identified herewith a check mark V Glossy photographs or pages. 2. Colored illustrations, paper or______ print 3. Photographs with dark background_____ 4. Illustrations are poor copy______ 5. Pages with black marks, not original copy. 6. Print shows through as there is text on both sides of page. 7. Indistinct, broken or small print on several pages 8. Print exceeds margin requirements______ 9. Tightly bound copy with print lost _______in spine 10. Computer printout pages with indistinct print. 11. Page(s)____________ lacking when material received, and not available from school or author. 12. Page(s) 134 seem to be missing in numbering only as text follows. 13. Two pages num tjered . Text follows. 14. Curling and wrinkled pages______ 15. Dissertation contains pages with print at a slant, filmed as received_________ 16. Other______________________________ ___________________________ ___ University Microfilms International THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE JEAN ANTOINE NOLLET AND EXPERIMENTAL NATURAL PHILOSOPHY IN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY FRANCE A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By RAMEZ BAHIGE MALUF Norman, Oklahoma 1985 JEAN ANTOINE NOLLET AND EXPERIMENTAL NATURAL PHILOSOPHY IN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY FRANCE A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE B . l ' à X t Z - ® 1985 Ramez Bahige Maluf All rights reserved PREFACE In my first year as a graduate I had an argument with a class­ mate over whether or not Nobel prize laureates in science would be con­ sidered the great scientists of our age by future historians. The discus­ sion revolved around these two points: If contemporaries were to decide what made for great scientific achievements and who was responsible for them, then historians would be deprived of the discretion of judging dif­ ferently. But, on the other hand, if historians disregarded the judge­ ment of contemporaries their narratives would run the risk of being ana­ chronistic . I have since then conquered most of my love for historical dilemmas, pseudo-dilemmas and "Great Scientists" theories of history. However, my initial interest in the Abbé Jean Antoine Nollet stemmed pre­ cisely from a desire to understand the reasons for the esteem he enjoyed in his lifetime, for I believed his physics to be too simple, his ideas commonsensical, and his diligence commendable but not the source of im­ portant scientific achievements. The more I looked into the matter the more I concurred with Voltaire's assessment of the Abbé: Nollet was not himself a great scientist but he knew more than great scientists of the past did. I hope that the following pages will justify this assessment. The reading copy of this dissertation was presented to members of the faculty of the History of Science Department at the University of iv Oklahoma in January of 1982 and defended the following month. I was asked then by the dissertation committee to make a few minor changes and corrections before submitting a final copy. One week later I flew back home to Beirut, Lebanon, believing I would send back the corrected ver­ sion in a few days, or a few weeks. In fact, it would be a few years before I did so. While it had taken me about fourteen months to prepare the reading copy, it was to take me over three years to turn it into a final copy. Throughout these three years Beirut offered a sharply dif­ ferent environment from Norman, Oklahoma, and I had many occasions to sorely miss the tranquility and wealth of resources available to me at the History of Science Collections during my student days. Because of these circumstances, literature relevant to the dis­ sertation published since 1982 is not, for the most part, incorporated into the dissertation. In translating passages from the French I have often opted for a literal rendering, preferring to sacrifice style rather than meaning. A recurring problem was the translation of the French word expérience. Eighteenth-century French writers did not have to distinguish between "experiment" and "experience" when they spoke of experimental physics, for the French word expérience may refer to both concepts, or either. When the distinction is not made in French, the translator into English has to force a certain interpretation sometimes judging "experiment" was meant and at others, "experience," I hope that on the numerous occa­ sions I have had to make this decision I was right more often than not. One of the pleasures the completion of the dissertation offers me is the opportunity to thank those whose help made a difference. I va would like first of all to express my appreciation to the members of the dissertation committee: Professors John Biro, David B. Kitts, Duane H. D. Roller, Thomas Smith, and Kenneth L. Taylor. I am grateful for their interest, patience, and suggestions. Professor Smith read more than one draft of some chapters which profited greatly from his perspicacious editorial pen. Professor Marcia Goodman, librarian in charge of the History of Science Collections, helped to solve many problems some of which appeared to me insurmountable. Her expert and kind help is acknowledged fondly. The chairman of my dissertation committee. Professor Taylor, offered precise and clear suggestions, constructive and inspiring cri­ ticisms. His adroit guidance was instrumental in the development of the thesis offered here. Putting the finishing touches on the dis­ sertation from Beirut would have been impossible without his patient help in Norman. I wish also to thank Professor Mary Jo Nye for her kind assis­ tance in checking some materials for my benefit at the Bibliothèque Nationale in Paris. Valli Powell's willingness to type this dissertation to help me meet a deadline is appreciated. My thanks also go to members of my family, Dalai, Zena and May for their financial and moral support. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PREFACE ...... ................... ........... ...... iv Chapter I. JEAN ANTOINE NOLLET (1700-1770) 1 II. NOLLET'S POSITION IN THE CARTESIAN-NEWTONIAN DEBATE . 27 III. NOLLET AND EXPERIMENTAL M E T H O D ............................... 80 IV. NOLLET AND ELECTRICITY ........................................ 115 V. CONCLUSION ...................................................... 163 APPENDIX 174 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................ 177 vil JEAN ANTOINE NOLLET AND EXPERIMENTAL NATURAL PHILOSOPHY IN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY FRANCE RAMEZ BAHIGE MALUF ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the scientific career of the Abbé Jean Antoine Nollet (1700-1770) and attempts to throw some light on his work in the context of eighteenth-century physics. A central theme of the dissertation is that Nollet enjoyed the esteem of contemporary scientists and savants because he preached and practised a type of physics that was considered beyond controversy, believed to be grounded on observation, experiments and those truths of science around which scientists were agreed. Nollet also helped popularize experimental physics by building its instruments, designing experiments, and advancing theories based on them. His most important theoretical contribution was in the field of electricity— the eighteenth-century experimental science par excellence. The theory of electricity he presented in 1745 provides an illustration of his method and work. It was formulated to explain a vast array of experimental and observational data and it relied heavily on the senses? it also relied on Nollet's notion of a science built on non-controversial facts, a science of consensus. The theory can be seen as a methodical viii arrangement of those ideas about electricity shared by a large number of students of the field and the many observations he performed. Nollet saw his work as part of a collective process that pre­ supposed standardization of instruments and procedures.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Discovering Electricity
    THE LEYDEN JAR 0. THE LEYDEN JAR - Story Preface 1. EARLY PIONEERS 2. EARLY EXPERIMENTS 3. THE LEYDEN JAR 4. LIGHTNING in a BOTTLE 5. ELECTRICITY and the TORPEDO FISH 6. MEET GALVANI and VOLTA 7. WHAT MAKES a FROG'S LEG TWITCH? 8. THE WORLD'S FIRST BATTERY 9. THE END and BEGINNING of an ERA In 1746, while visiting Professor Pieter van Musschenbroek’s lab in Leiden (The Netherlands), Andreas Cuneus (a Dutch lawyer, scientist and erstwhile Professor’s assistant) received an extremely powerful shock. This artist’s conception depicts Cuneus, in the lab, attempting to condense electricity in a glass of water. When he tried to pull the wire out of the water, Cuneus was stunned by the magnitude of the shock he received (since it was much worse than that produced by an electrostatic generator, seen on the right side of the drawing). It took him two days to recover. The illustration is Figure 382, at page 570 of Elementary Treatise on Natural Philosophy, Part 3: Electricity and Magnetism, by Augustin Privat Deschanel (translated and edited by J. D. Everett), published in New York, during 1876, by D. Appleton and Co. Online via Google Books. Early experimenters, trying to understand electricity, wondered about its properties: If electricity flows (like water), could it be stored (like water)? Since glass is an insulator, could electricity be stored in a glass jar? If we pour water into a glass jar, then we position a metal wire into the water-containing jar - hooked, at the top, to a Hauksbee electrostatic generator - what would happen? Pieter Van Musschenbroek (a Professor working at Leiden University, in The Netherlands) was particularly keen to store electricity.
    [Show full text]
  • Newton.Indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 16-11-12 / 14:45 | Pag
    omslag Newton.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 16-11-12 / 14:45 | Pag. 1 e Dutch Republic proved ‘A new light on several to be extremely receptive to major gures involved in the groundbreaking ideas of Newton Isaac Newton (–). the reception of Newton’s Dutch scholars such as Willem work.’ and the Netherlands Jacob ’s Gravesande and Petrus Prof. Bert Theunissen, Newton the Netherlands and van Musschenbroek played a Utrecht University crucial role in the adaption and How Isaac Newton was Fashioned dissemination of Newton’s work, ‘is book provides an in the Dutch Republic not only in the Netherlands important contribution to but also in the rest of Europe. EDITED BY ERIC JORINK In the course of the eighteenth the study of the European AND AD MAAS century, Newton’s ideas (in Enlightenment with new dierent guises and interpre- insights in the circulation tations) became a veritable hype in Dutch society. In Newton of knowledge.’ and the Netherlands Newton’s Prof. Frans van Lunteren, sudden success is analyzed in Leiden University great depth and put into a new perspective. Ad Maas is curator at the Museum Boerhaave, Leiden, the Netherlands. Eric Jorink is researcher at the Huygens Institute for Netherlands History (Royal Dutch Academy of Arts and Sciences). / www.lup.nl LUP Newton and the Netherlands.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 16-11-12 / 16:47 | Pag. 1 Newton and the Netherlands Newton and the Netherlands.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 16-11-12 / 16:47 | Pag. 2 Newton and the Netherlands.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 16-11-12 / 16:47 | Pag.
    [Show full text]
  • Lorentz – Function Follows Form and Theory Leads to Experiment
    Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/22522 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation. Author: Weiss, Martin Paul Michael Title: The masses and the muses : a history of Teylers Museum in the Nineteenth Century Issue Date: 2013-11-27 The Masses and the Muses A History of Teylers Museum in the Nineteenth Century Front cover: The Oval Room, drawing by Johan Conrad Greive, 1862 (Teylers Museum, Haarlem, DD042b) Back cover: The First Art Gallery, drawing by Johan Conrad Greive, 1862 (Teylers Museum, Haarlem, DD042d) The Masses and the Muses A History of Teylers Museum in the Nineteenth Century Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van Doctor aan de Universiteit Leiden, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. mr. C.J.J.M. Stolker, volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties te verdedigen op woensdag 27 november 2013 klokke 15.00 uur door Martin Paul Michael Weiss geboren te Hannover in 1985 Promotiecommissie Prof. Dr. F.H. van Lunteren (promotor, Universiteit Leiden) Prof. Dr. D. van Delft (Universiteit Leiden) Prof. Dr. P.J. ter Keurs (Universiteit Leiden) Dr. D.J. Meijers (Universiteit van Amsterdam) Prof. dr. W.W. Mijnhardt (Universiteit Utrecht) Prof. Dr. H.J.A. Röttgering (Universiteit Leiden) Prof. Dr. L.T.G. Theunissen (Universiteit Utrecht) Dr. H.J. Zuidervaart (Huygens Instituut voor Nederlandse Geschiedenis) Prof. Dr. R. Zwijnenberg (Universiteit Leiden) Acknowledgements This PhD was not written in isolation. Throughout the course of this project I received an unquantifiable amount of support – intellectual, financial and moral – from innumerable colleagues and friends. Some of them I hope to be able to acknowledge here.
    [Show full text]
  • – by Julia Cipo, Holger Kersten –
    THE GAS DISCHARGE PHYSICS IN THE 18th CENTURY – by Julia Cipo, Holger Kersten – Francis Edmond Hauksbee Halley * 1666 in Colchester, Great Britain † April/ May 1713 in London * November 8th, 1656 in Haggerston, London † January 25th, 1742 in Greenwich Francis Hauksbee was a british scientist, lab assistant of Isaac Newton *4 and an elected member of the Royal Society for researches in science. Edmond Halley was a british astro- ric (height) formula. In 1716 a bright physicist, meteorologist, mathemati- Aurora Borealis (Northern Lights) ing from the North Pole to the South Inspired by Picard’s and Bernoulli’s results on the luminosity of mercu- cian and member of the Royal So- was sighted in Germany, England, Pole. Even though this wasn’t correct, ry in barometric tubes, Hauksbee continued experimenting with mercu- ciety. As the earth’s magnetic fi eld France and Holland. Halley began he determined that the aurora’s arc ry with one difference: he examined the probe in a vacuum vessel. In fascinated him, he worked on this searching for a scientifi c explana- did not course along the geographic his 1709 publicated work topic during the years 1683-1710 tion of this phenomena. He suggest- pole, but along the magnetic pole. *1 called “Physio-mechanical and discovered the line profi le of the ed that the aurora was caused by an experiments on various Hauksbee’s generator magnetic fi eld as well as the baromet- evaporation of magnetic liquid mov- subjects touching light and electricity” he described that after placing mercu- ry in the glass vessel and then evacuating the air, a bright glow could be sight- ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Jean-Baptiste Sarlandie`Re's Mechanical Leeches (1817–1825): an Early Response in the Netherlands to a Shortage of Leeches
    Medical History, 2009, 53: 253–270 Jean-Baptiste Sarlandie`re’s Mechanical Leeches (1817–1825): An Early Response in the Netherlands to a Shortage of Leeches TEUNIS WILLEM VAN HEININGEN* Introduction At the end of the eighteenth century there was a rapidly growing demand for leeches in Europe. Western European and Central European freshwater species had been mainly used until then but now more and more different species were introduced.1 England imported large numbers from Eastern Europe and the Levant, and Pondicherry in Southern India was an important centre for the shipment of these animals whose application was considered a mild form of bloodletting.2 In the autumn of 1825 the Algemeene Konst- en Letterbode, a Dutch weekly journal, drew attention to a shortage, informing its readers that large numbers, kept for medical purposes, had died without an apparent cause,3 possibly through an unknown infective agent. It also printed information by a German pharmacist from Kassel on the proper method of keeping leeches alive as long as possible in large aquaria, by including water plants.4 One solution to the problem had already been invented—the artificial leech of Jean- Baptiste Sarlandie`re. At their annual general meeting, held on 21 May 1821, the officers of the Dutch Society of Sciences (Hollandsche Maatschappij der Wetenschappen, founded in 1752), on learning of Sarlandie`re’s invention through Martinus van Marum, the Society’s secretary, decided to hold a competition on its serviceability.5 They were persuaded by the increasing demand for leeches, as well as by the fascinating and pro- mising aspects and originality of Sarlandie`re’s invention.
    [Show full text]
  • Cover Page the Handle
    Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/22522 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation. Author: Weiss, Martin Paul Michael Title: The masses and the muses : a history of Teylers Museum in the Nineteenth Century Issue Date: 2013-11-27 Chapter II: The Birth of a Musaeum I The Museum’s Pre-History 1. Martinus van Marum & the Beginning of the Age of Museums In a letter to the Dutch minister of the interior Anton Reinhard Falck posted in July 1819, the ornithologist and collector Coenraad Jacob Temminck left no doubt as to what he thought two of his colleagues really wanted to do to him, if the opportunity ever presented itself: “Both”, he wrote, “would stop at nothing to clear me out of the way”.1 He was referring to Sebald Justinus Brugmans, professor of botany and director of the botanical gardens in Leiden, and Martinus van Marum, the director of Teylers Museum and secretary of the Holland Society of Sciences in Haarlem. This was more than just a letter of complaint. Temminck himself was no angel, and at the time was in fact pursuing his own political agenda. He had dined with Falck just a few days earlier, and the two men had discussed the establishment of a national museum of natural history in the Netherlands – of which Temminck was to be handed the directorship. Just 13 months later, Temminck’s highly valuable and widely recognised personal ornithological collection, consisting of more than 4000 stuffed birds, had indeed been merged with both the University of Leiden’s natural history collections and the former Royal Cabinet of Natural History in Amsterdam, to form the new National Museum of Natural History (Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie) based in Leiden.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Atwood's Machine
    Advances in Historical Studies 2014. Vol.3, No.1, 68-81 Published Online February 2014 in SciRes (http://www.scirp.org/journal/ahs) http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ahs.2014.31007 Spreading Newtonian Philosophy with Instruments: The Case of Atwood’s Machine Salvatore Esposito1, Edvige Schettino2 1I.N.F.N., Naples Unit, Naples, Italy 2Department of Physics, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy Email: [email protected], [email protected] Received June 13th, 2013; revised July 20th, 2013; accepted July 29th, 2013 Copyright © 2014 Salvatore Esposito, Edvige Schettino. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In accordance of the Creative Commons Attribution Li- cense all Copyrights © 2014 are reserved for SCIRP and the owner of the intellectual property Salvatore Esposito, Edvige Schettino. All Copyright © 2014 are guarded by law and by SCIRP as a guardian. We study how the paradigm of Newton’s science, based on the organization of scientific knowledge as a series of mathematical laws, was definitively accepted in science courses—in the last decades of the XVIII century, in England as well as in the Continent—by means of the “universal” dynamical machine invented by George Atwood in late 1770s just for this purpose. The spreading of such machine, occurring well before the appearance of Atwood’s treatise where he described the novel machine and the experi- ments to be performed with it, is a quite interesting historical case, which we consider in some detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Cum Ferme Omnes Ante Cartesium Arbitrarentur, Primam Humanae
    General Theses from Physics As Taught in the Clementine College Don Alexandro Malaspina of the Imperial Marquisate of Mulazzo, Member of the said College. Facta cuilibet singulas impugnandi facultate. [Great deeds are achieved by attacking them singly.] ____________________________________________________________________ Rome 1771 From the Press of Lorenzo Capponi. ___________________________________________ With the Sanction of the Higher Authorities. 1 Of the Principles of Education in Physics Since the serious study of a philosophical man looks above all to this end, that he might achieve certainty and clear knowledge of things, we ourselves have taken pains at the outset to render an account according to reason, so that through our careful investigation of physics, the mind might thus be drawn towards Nature. Of physicists, we consider, with John Keill,a,1 four schools to be pre-eminent among the rest, the first being the Pythagoreans and Platonists; another has its origin in the Peripatetic School;2 the third tribe of Philosophisers pursues the experimental method; and the final class of physicists is commonly known as the Mechanists. While not all that is propounded by these schools is worthy of assent, yet in each there are certain things of which we approve, abhorring as we do the fault with which Leibniz charges the Cartesians,b,3 namely that of judging the ancient authors with contempt, punishing them, as it were, according to one’s own law. And since Those things last long, and are fixed firmly in the mind, Which we, once born, have imbibed from our earliest years, we select what will be of most use in the future, and of all this we present to our scholars an ordered account: no one would think it suitable for us to hear or read anything contrary to method,c,4 for in general it is through habit, and especially through philosophical habit, that youth is first instructed in the colleges.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics English Final
    General Theses from Physics As Taught in the Clementine College Don Alexandro Malaspina of the Imperial Marquisate of Mulazzo, Member of the said College. Facta cuilibet singulas impugnandi facultate. [Great deeds are achieved by attacking them singly.] ____________________________________________________________________ Rome 1771 From the Press of Lorenzo Capponi. ___________________________________________ With the Sanction of the Higher Authorities. 1 Of the Principles of Education in Physics Since the serious study of a philosophical man looks above all to this end, that he might achieve certainty and clear knowledge of things, we ourselves have taken pains at the outset to render an account according to reason, so that through our careful investigation of physics, the mind might thus be drawn towards Nature. Of physicists, we consider, with John Keill,a,1 four schools to be pre-eminent among the rest, the first being the Pythagoreans and Platonists; another has its origin in the Peripatetic School;2 the third tribe of Philosophisers pursues the experimental method; and the final class of physicists is commonly known as the Mechanists. While not all that is propounded by these schools is worthy of assent, yet in each there are certain things of which we approve, abhorring as we do the fault with which Leibniz charges the Cartesians,b,3 namely that of judging the ancient authors with contempt, punishing them, as it were, according to one’s own law. And since Those things last long, and are fixed firmly in the mind, Which we, once born, have imbibed from our earliest years, we select what will be of most use in the future, and of all this we present to our scholars an ordered account: no one would think it suitable for us to hear or read anything contrary to method,c,4 for in general it is through habit, and especially through philosophical habit, that youth is first instructed in the colleges.
    [Show full text]
  • The Physics Cabinet of the University of Padua. at the Crossroads Between Veneto and Europe
    OPUSCULA MUSEALIA 26 2019 doi:10.4467/20843852.OM.18.010.11003 s. 157–172 FANNY MARCON https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9361-157X GIULIO PERUZZI https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8331-1864 SOFIA TALAS https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1971-8680 University of Padua The Physics Cabinet of the University of Padua. At the crossroads between Veneto and Europe ABSTRACT At the beginning of the eighteenth century, new lectures in natural philosophy based on direct and immediate demonstrations began to spread through Europe. Within this context, a chair of experimental philosophy was created at the University of Padua in 1738, and the new pro- fessor, Giovanni Poleni, established a Cabinet of Physics, which became very well known in eighteenth-century Europe. In the following two centuries, Poleni’s successors continued to acquire thousands of instruments used for teaching and research, which today are held at the Museum of the History of Physics of the University of Padua. The present paper describes the main peculiarities of the collection, comprising instruments from the Renaissance to the twentieth century. We also discuss the current acquisition policy of the museum, aimed at collecting material evidence of the research and teaching activities in physics that are carried out in Padua today. We will outline both the local peculiarities of the collection and its inter- national dimension, based on the contacts that have been established throughout the centuries between Padua and the international scientific community. Some aspects of the circulation of scientific
    [Show full text]
  • Kant's Dynamic Theory of Matter in 1755
    Kant’s dynamic theory of matter in 1755, and its debt to speculative Newtonian experimentalism Michela Massimi Dept. of Science and Technology Studies University College London Abstract This paper explores the scientific sources behind Kant’s early dynamic theory of matter in 1755, with a focus on two main Kant’s writings: Universal Natural History and Theory of the Heavens and On Fire. The year 1755 has often been portrayed by Kantian scholars as a turning point in the intellectual career of the young Kant, with his much debated conversion to Newton. Via a careful analysis of some salient themes in the two aforementioned works, and a reconstruction of the scientific sources behind them, this paper shows Kant’s debt to an often overlooked scientific tradition, i.e. speculative Newtonian experimentalism. The paper argues that more than the Principia, it was the speculative experimentalism that goes from Newton’s Opticks to Herman Boerhaave’s Elementa chemiae via Stephen Hales’ Vegetable Staticks that played a central role in the elaboration of Kant’s early dynamic theory of matter in 1755. Keywords: Kant, repulsive force, ether, Newton, Hales, Boerhaave 1. Introduction In 1786, in Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, Kant famously introduced attraction and repulsion as two fundamental forces in nature, within the context of his own defence of a “dynamical natural philosophy”. The purpose of a “dynamical natural philosophy” is to explain natural phenomena in terms of “moving forces of attraction and repulsion originally inherent in them”,1 by contrast with the “mechanical natural philosophy” which “under the name of atomism or the 1 Kant (1786); English translation (2004), p.
    [Show full text]
  • Spreading Scientific Philosophies with Instruments: the Case of Atwood's
    SPREADING SCIENTIFIC PHILOSOPHIES WITH INSTRUMENTS: THE CASE OF ATWOOD'S MACHINE S. ESPOSITO AND E. SCHETTINO Abstract. We study how the paradigm of Newton's science, based on the or- ganization of scientific knowledge as a series of mathematical laws, was defini- tively accepted in science courses - in the last decades of the XVIII century, in England as well as in the Continent - by means of the \universal" dynamical machine invented by George Atwood in late 1770s just for this purpose. The spreading of such machine, occurred well before the appearance of Atwood's treatise where he described the novel machine and the experiments to be performed with it, is a quite interesting historical case, which we consider in some detail. In particular, we focus on the \improvement" introduced by the Italian Giuseppe Saverio Poli and the subsequent “simplifications” of the machine, underlying the ongoing change of perspective after the definitive success of Newtonianism. The case studied here allows to recognize the relevant role played by a prop- erly devised instrument in the acceptance of a new paradigm by non-erudite scholars, in addition to the traditional ways involving erudite scientists, and thus the complementary role of machine philosophy with respect to mathe- matical, philosophical or even physical reasoning. 1. Introduction The XVIII century was characterized by a widespread interest for natural phi- losophy, driven by public lecture courses and the publication of popular texts in addition to the traditional forms of transmission of knowledge. The scientific soci- eties and academies created during the scientific revolution played an increasingly larger role than universities, thus becoming the cornerstone of organized science [1].
    [Show full text]