New Occurrence Records for Stygobiontic Invertebrates from the Edwards and Trinity Aquifers in West-Central Texas, USA
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Download This PDF File
Last Name of Authors Examples: Smith Smith & Meyer Smith et al. GUIDELINES FOR MANUSCRIPT PREPARATION Journal Scope. Speleobiology Notes specializes on brief observations on the natural history of subterranean organisms, such as predation events, episodes of reproduction, occurrence in unusual habitats or microhabitats, localized population extinctions, range extensions, new records of species at a given location, and many other natural history phenomena. The journal aims to serve as the primary outlet for much interesting and important information on subterranean fauna contained in the field notes of many speleobiologists, information deemed too fragmented, too brief, too basic, or simply too irrelevant to be included within full-length, traditional scientific journal articles. General Formatting. Manuscripts must be in English. If English is not your native language, please have your manuscript reviewed by a native English-speaking person(s). Manuscripts should be limited to 2500 words or less (not including title, authors and affiliations, key words, and literature cited). The manuscript file should be saved in the native format of the word processing software used (please save as .doc or .docx). To avoid unnecessary errors, you are strongly encouraged to use the ʻspell- checkʼ and ʻgrammar-checkʼ features of your word processing software. The text should be in single-column format. The manuscript should be single-spaced with 2.54 cm (1 inch) margins and 12-point Helvetica font (unless noted otherwise below). For review purposes, please include consecutive page numbers in the page footer and use continuous line numbering throughout the document. Present tables and figure legends on separate pages at the end of the manuscript. -
Downloaded from Brill.Com10/02/2021 05:23:45PM Via Free Access 24 R
Contributions to Zoology, 70 (1) 23-39 (2001) SPB Academic Publishing bv, The Hague Hierarchical analysis of mtDNA variation and the use of mtDNA for isopod (Crustacea: Peracarida: Isopoda) systematics R. Wetzer Invertebrate Zoology, Crustacea, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007, USA, [email protected] Keywords: 12S rRNA, 16S rRNA, COI, mitochondrial DNA, isopod, Crustacea, molecular Abstract Transition/transversion bias 30 Discussion 32 Nucleotide composition 32 Carefully collected molecular data and rigorous analyses are Transition/transversionbias 34 revolutionizing today’s phylogenetic studies. Althoughmolecular Sequence divergences 34 data have been used to estimate various invertebrate phylogenies Rate variation across 34 lor lineages more than a decade,this is the first ofdifferent study survey Conclusions 35 of regions mitochondrial DNA in isopod crustaceans assessing Acknowledgements 36 sequence divergence and hence the usefulness ofthese regions References 36 to infer phylogeny at different hierarchical levels. 1 evaluate three loci fromthe mitochondrial ribosomal RNAs genome (two (12S, 16S) and oneprotein-coding (COI)) for their appropriateness in inferring isopod phylogeny at the suborder level and below. Introduction The patterns are similar for all three loci with the most speciose suborders ofisopods also having the most divergent mitochondrial The crustacean order Isopoda is important and nucleotide sequences. Recommendations for designing an or- because it has a broad dis- der- or interesting geographic suborder-level molecular study in previously unstudied groups of Crustacea tribution and is diverse. There would include: (1) collecting a minimum morphologically are of two-four species or genera thoughtto be most divergent, (2) more than 10,000 described marine, freshwater, sampling the across of interest as equally as possible in group and terrestrial species, ranging in length from 0.5 terms of taxonomic representation and the distributionofspecies, mm to 440 mm. -
A Biological Inventory of Eight Caves in Northwestern Georgia with Conservation Implications
Kurt A. Buhlmann - A biological inventory of eight caves in northwestern Georgia with conservation implications. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies 63(3): 91-98. A BIOLOGICAL INVENTORY OF EIGHT CAVES IN NORTHWESTERN GEORGIA WITH CONSERVATION IMPLICATIONS KURT A. BUHLMANN1 University of Georgia, Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, Aiken, SC 29802 USA A 1995 biological inventory of 8 northwestern Georgia caves documented or re-confirmed the presence of 46 species of invertebrates, 35 considered troglobites or troglophiles. The study yielded new cave records for amphipods, isopods, diplurans, and carabid beetles. New state records for Georgia included a pselaphid beetle. Ten salamander species were in the 8 caves, including a true troglobite, the Tennessee cave salamander. Two frog, 4 bat, and 1 rodent species were also documented. One cave contained a large colony of gray bats. For carabid beetles, leiodid beetles, and millipeds, the species differed between the caves of Pigeon and Lookout Mountain. Diplurans were absent from Lookout Mountain caves, yet were present in all Pigeon Mountain caves. A comparison between 1967 and 1995 inventories of Pettijohns Cave noted the absence of 2 species of drip pool amphipods from the latter. One cave had been contaminated by a petroleum spill and the expected aquatic fauna was not found. Further inventory work is suggested and the results should be applied to management strategies that provide for both biodiver- sity protection and recreational cave use. Georgia is a cave-rich state, with most caves occurring in 29 July; Nash Waterfall Cave [NW] on 5 August; and Pigeon two distinct physiographic regions, the Cumberland Plateau Cave [PC] on 16 July (a) and 30 July (b). -
Platyhelminthes, Tricladida, Kenkiidae) from Great Smoky Mountains National Park
Journal of the North Carolina Academy of Science, 131(1), 2015, pp. 15–17 A CAVE PLANARIAN, SPHALLOPLANA PERCOECA, (PLATYHELMINTHES, TRICLADIDA, KENKIIDAE) FROM GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK BENNY GLASGOW1 and PAULA PIERCE2 1Principal investigator, Park study GRSM-00341, 101 William Street, Vernon, AL 35592 Email: [email protected] 2Excalibur Pathology, Inc., 5830 N Blue Lake Dr., Norman OK 73069 Email: [email protected] Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/jncas/article-pdf/131/1/15/1818171/2167-5872-131_1_15.pdf by guest on 27 September 2021 Abstract: Five cave planarians collected from Gregory’s Cave, Blount Co., TN, Great Smoky Mountains National Park, were analyzed using stained serial sections and two are identified as Sphalloplana percoeca (Packard 1879). Notes on specimen characteristics and habitat are given, two photographs are provided, and the species’ taxonomy and distribution are discussed. Key Words: Sphalloplana percoeca; Kenkiidae; Gregory’s Cave. INTRODUCTION 1978, pers. comm. 2010). Aquatic amphipods may be The Great Smoky Mountains National Park’s ongo- food sources for cave planarians (Reeves 2000; Carpen- ing All Taxa Biodiversity Inventory, to determine ter 1982). Bats, amphibians, amphipods, millipedes, and presence and distribution of Park species or discover insects were observed in the cave during Park study new species, elicits this report on an obligate cave GRSM-00341 collections. Mays (2001) reported amphi- planarian belonging to family Kenkiidae (Hyman 1937). pods, millipedes, and spiders inhabiting the cave. Larvae Cave planarians are not well known and there could be of the Long-tailed Salamander (Eurycea longicauda) new species yet undiscovered. Gregory’s Cave was were reported in the cave’s rimstone pools (Dodd et al. -
Working Copy of Thesis
MACROINVERTEBRATE STRUCTURE AND DRIFT IN THE BLANCO RIVER: A KARST TEXAS STREAM SUBJECT TO HYDROLOGIC VARIABILITY THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of Texas State University-San Marcos in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of SCIENCE by David Pendergrass, B.A. San Marcos, Texas December 2006 MACROINVERTEBRATE STRUCTURE AND DRIFT IN THE BLANCO RIVER: A KARST TEXAS STREAM SUBJECT TO HYDROLOGIC VARIABILITY Committee Members Approved: __________________________________ Dr. Timothy H. Bonner, Chair __________________________________ Dr. Thomas L. Arsuffi __________________________________ Dr. Alan W. Groeger _____________________________________ Dr. Glenn Longley Approved: ________________________ Dr. J. Michael Willoughby Dean of the Graduate College ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Jesus is the author of the Blanco River and the ultimate source of the pleasure and success I have enjoyed in this study. Thank you for giving me this opportunity and teaching me joy in every circumstance. My sincere gratitude goes to my professors who were unrelenting in their desire to see me produce quality work. Casey Williams, thank you for the mentoring and friendship. Pete Diaz, Sarah Frey, Brad Caston and the many others who offered field and lab time: my sincerest thanks. The Nature Conservancy, Texas State University-San Marcos and private donors paved the way for this research and put food on my table. Finally, to my wife Krista: you bore the weight of this thesis too. I knew when we married that you loved me but your persistent support these last three years has raised my understanding of your love to unimaginable heights. This manuscript was submitted on November 11, 2006. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.............................................................................................. -
Crustacea-Arthropoda) Fauna of Sinop and Samsun and Their Ecology
J. Black Sea/Mediterranean Environment Vol. 15: 47- 60 (2009) Freshwater and brackish water Malacostraca (Crustacea-Arthropoda) fauna of Sinop and Samsun and their ecology Sinop ve Samsun illeri tatlısu ve acısu Malacostraca (Crustacea-Arthropoda) faunası ve ekolojileri Mehmet Akbulut1*, M. Ruşen Ustaoğlu2, Ekrem Şanver Çelik1 1 Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Fisheries Faculty, Çanakkale-Turkey 2 Ege University, Fisheries Faculty, Izmir-Turkey Abstract Malacostraca fauna collected from freshwater and brackishwater in Sinop and Samsun were studied from 181 stations between February 1999 and September 2000. 19 species and 4 subspecies belonging to 15 genuses were found in 134 stations. In total, 23 taxon were found: 11 Amphipoda, 6 Decapoda, 4 Isopoda, and 2 Mysidacea. Limnomysis benedeni is the first time in Turkish Mysidacea fauna. In this work at the first time recorded group are Gammarus pulex pulex, Gammarus aequicauda, Gammarus uludagi, Gammarus komareki, Gammarus longipedis, Gammarus balcanicus, Echinogammarus ischnus, Orchestia stephenseni Paramysis kosswigi, Idotea baltica basteri, Idotea hectica, Sphaeroma serratum, Palaemon adspersus, Crangon crangon, Potamon ibericum tauricum and Carcinus aestuarii in the studied area. Potamon ibericum tauricum is the most encountered and widespread species. Key words: Freshwater, brackish water, Malacostraca, Sinop, Samsun, Turkey Introduction The Malacostraca is the largest subgroup of crustaceans and includes the decapods such as crabs, mole crabs, lobsters, true shrimps and the stomatopods or mantis shrimps. There are more than 22,000 taxa in this group representing two third of all crustacean species and contains all the larger forms. *Corresponding author: [email protected] 47 Malacostracans play an important role in aquatic ecosystems and therefore their conservation is important. -
Lazare Botosaneanu ‘Naturalist’ 61 Doi: 10.3897/Subtbiol.10.4760
Subterranean Biology 10: 61-73, 2012 (2013) Lazare Botosaneanu ‘Naturalist’ 61 doi: 10.3897/subtbiol.10.4760 Lazare Botosaneanu ‘Naturalist’ 1927 – 2012 demic training shortly after the Second World War at the Faculty of Biology of the University of Bucharest, the same city where he was born and raised. At a young age he had already showed interest in Zoology. He wrote his first publication –about a new caddisfly species– at the age of 20. As Botosaneanu himself wanted to remark, the prominent Romanian zoologist and man of culture Constantin Motaş had great influence on him. A small portrait of Motaş was one of the few objects adorning his ascetic office in the Amsterdam Museum. Later on, the geneticist and evolutionary biologist Theodosius Dobzhansky and the evolutionary biologist Ernst Mayr greatly influenced his thinking. In 1956, he was appoint- ed as a senior researcher at the Institute of Speleology belonging to the Rumanian Academy of Sciences. Lazare Botosaneanu began his career as an entomologist, and in particular he studied Trichoptera. Until the end of his life he would remain studying this group of insects and most of his publications are dedicated to the Trichoptera and their environment. His colleague and friend Prof. Mar- cos Gonzalez, of University of Santiago de Compostella (Spain) recently described his contribution to Entomolo- gy in an obituary published in the Trichoptera newsletter2 Lazare Botosaneanu’s first contribution to the study of Subterranean Biology took place in 1954, when he co-authored with the Romanian carcinologist Adriana Damian-Georgescu a paper on animals discovered in the drinking water conduits of the city of Bucharest. -
Report for the Northern Virginia Well Amphipod (Stygobromus Phreaticus) August 2019 Version 1.1
Species Status Assessment (SSA) Report for the Northern Virginia Well Amphipod (Stygobromus phreaticus) August 2019 Version 1.1 Stygobromus phreaticus. Photo provided by: Michelle Brown, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Northeast Region ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research for this document was prepared by Jacob Osborne (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)—North Attleboro Fish Hatchery) with technical assistance from Krishna Gifford (USFWS—Northeast Regional Office). We greatly appreciate the assistance of the following individuals who provided helpful information and/or review of the draft document: • Chris Hobson and William Orndorff (Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Natural Heritage Program) • Dorothy Keough, John Pilcicki, Christopher Manikas, and Lindsey David (U.S. Army Garrison Fort Belvoir) • Robert Denton (Geoconcepts Engineering, Inc.) • Cindy Schulz , Sumalee Hoskin, Susan Lingenfelser, and Serena Ciparis (USFWS— Virginia Ecological Services Field Office (VAFO) • Anthony Tur and Jean Brennan (USFWS—Northeast Regional Office) • Meagan Kelhart (formerly, USFWS—Headquarters) We also thank our peer reviewers: • Steve Taylor (Colorado College) • Dave Culver (American University, retired) • Dan Fong (American University) • Olivia DeLee (U.S. Geological Survey, Northeast Climate Adaptation Science Center) Suggested reference: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2019. Species status assessment for the Northern Virginia Well Amphipod (Stygobromus phreaticus). Version -
A Checklist and Annotated Bibliography of the Subterranean Aquatic Fauna of Texas
A CHECKLIST AND ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE SUBTERRANEAN AQUATIC FAUNA OF TEXAS JAMES R. REDDELL and ROBERT W. MITCHELL Texas Technological College WATER RESOURCES \ CENTER Lubbock, Texas WRC 69-6 INTERNATIONAL CENTER for ARID and August 1969 SEMI-ARID LAND STUDIES A CHECKLIST AND ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE SUBTERRANEAN AQUATIC FAUNA OF TEXAS James R. Reddell and Robert W. Mitchell Department of Biology Texas Tech University Lubbock, Texas INTRODUCTION In view of the ever-increasing interest in all studies relating to the water resources of Texas, we have found it timely to prepare this guide to the fauna and biological literature of our subterranean waters. The value of such a guide has already been demonstrated by Clark (1966) in his "Publications, Personnel, and Government Organizations Related to the Limnology, Aquatic Biology and Ichthyology of the Inland Waters of Texas". This publication dea ls primarily with inland surface waters, however, barely touching upon the now rather extensive literature which has accumulated on the biology of our subterranean waters. To state a n obvious fact, it is imperative that our underground waters receive the attention due them. They are one of our most important resources. Those subterranean waters for which biological data exi st are very un equally distributed in the state. The best known are those which are acces sible to collection and study via the entrances of caves. Even in cavernous regions there exist inaccessible deep aquifers which have yielded little in formation as yet. Biological data from the underground waters of non-cave rn ous areas are virtually non-existant. -
DRAFT 8/8/2013 Updates at Chapter 40 -- Karstology
Chapter 40 -- Karstology Characterizing the mechanism of cavern accretion as "force" tends to suggest catastrophic attack, not a process of subtle persistence. Publicity for Ohio's Olentangy Indian Caverns illustrates the misconception. Formed millions of years ago by the tremendous force of an underground river cutting through solid limestone rock, the Olentangy Indian Caverns. There was no tremendous event millions of years ago; it's been dissolution at a rate barely discernable, century to century. Another rendition of karst stages, this time in elevation, as opposed to cross-section. Juvenile Youthful Mature Complex Extreme 594 DRAFT 8/8/2013 Updates at http://www.unm.edu/~rheggen/UndergroundRivers.html Chapter 40 -- Karstology It may not be the water, per se, but its withdrawal that initiates catastrophic change in conduit cross-section. The figure illustrates stress lines around natural cavities in limestone. Left: Distribution around water-filled void below water table Right: Distribution around air-filled void after lowering water table. Natural Bridges and Tunnels Natural bridges begin as subterranean conduits, but subsequent collapse has left only a remnant of the original roof. "Men have risked their lives trying to locate the meanderings of this stream, but have been unsuccessful." Virginia's Natural Bridge, 65 meters above today's creek bed. George Washington is said to have surveyed Natural Bridge, though he made no mention it in his journals. More certain is that Thomas Jefferson purchased "the most sublime of nature's works," in his words, from King George III. Herman Melville alluded to the formation in describing Moby Dick, But soon the fore part of him slowly rose from the water; for an instant his whole marbleized body formed a high arch, like Virginia's Natural Bridge. -
Distribution of Three Intertidal Cirolanid Isopods (Flabellifera : Cirolanidae) on a South African Sandy Beach
Cah. Biol. Mar. (1992), 33: 147- 168 Roscoff Distribution of three intertidal cirolanid isopods (Flabellifera : Cirolanidae) on a South African sandy beach. A.M.C. De Ruyck, T.E. Donn, jr and A. McLachlan Zoology Department and Institute for Coastal Research, University of Port Elizabeth, P.O. Box 1600, Port Elizabeth, 6000, South Africa Ab5tract : The vertical zonation pattern of Eurydice IOllgicomis. P011loge/oides lalipcs and E.rciro/ana llata/ellSis, cirolanid isopods co-existing on Sundays River Beach, was studied, and differed l'rom Dahl 's, Salvat's and Trevallion Cl al.'s schemes. In view of the apparent differences in zonation both in the present study and the litera ture, the use of cirolanid isopods as indicators of zones is questionable. Environmental factors are suspected to be more important th an biological interactions as cause for the observed zonation patterns of the three species. This study suggests longshore distributional differences in the cirolanid iso pod populations bQth on a large scale along a log-spiral bay and on a 5mall scale along a mega-cusp system. Seasonal changes ln distribution seem to occur in ail three species as weil as semilunar zonation changes in E. l/CIta/cllS is. The t1exible zonation patterns exhibited by the cirolanid isopods at Sundays River Beach may be an adaptation for survival in the dynamic, unstable conditions of a high energy, microtidal beach. Résumé: L'arrangement de la zonation verticale des isopodes cirolanides coexistants sur la plage de Sundays River a été étudiée; il s'agit des Eurydice /ollgicomis (Stüder, 1883), des POllloge/oides laripes (Barnard, 1914 b) et des E.rcirolm/CI llata/cllSis (Vanh6ffen, 1914). -
Conservation Assessment for Hoffmaster's Cave Flatworm
Conservation Assessment for Hoffmaster’s Cave Flatworm (Macrocotyla hoffmasteri) (from Kenk, 1975) USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region December 2001 Julian J. Lewis, Ph.D. J. Lewis & Associates, Biological Consulting 217 W. Carter Avenue Clarksville, IN 47129 [email protected] This Conservation Assessment was prepared to compile the published and unpublished information on Macrocotyla hoffmasteri. It does not represent a management decision by the U.S. Forest Service. Though the best scientific information available was used and subject experts were consulted in preparation of this document, it is expected that new information will arise. In the spirit of continuous learning and adaptive management, if you have information that will assist in conserving the subject community and associated taxa, please contact the Eastern Region of the Forest Service Threatened and Endangered Species Program at 310 Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203. Conservation Assessment for Hoffmaster’s Cave Flatworm (Macrocotyla hoffmasteri) 2 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................... 4 NOMENCLATURE AND TAXONOMY .................................................. 4 DESCRIPTION OF SPECIES .................................................................... 4 LIFE HISTORY............................................................................................ 5 HABITAT ...................................................................................................... 5 DISTRIBUTION