DOCSLIB.ORG

Foundation Report 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Foundation Report 2020 This is a joint local government, central government and Iwi project and will deliver a 30 year spatial plan for the region with a list of projects and investment requirements. Wellington Regional Growth Framework | 1 Introduction Ka ora te wai If the water is healthy The process for developing the Framework will develop Significant investment in housing, urban development, Ka ora te whenua the land will be nourished and test possible future scenarios for the region transport and three waters infrastructure and services over the next 30 to 100 years. It will test the need for as well as regional and district planning and policy Ka ora te whenua If the land is nourished significant infrastructure and other investments and changes will be needed to support future growth Ka ora te tangata the people will be provided for recommend a prioritised regional programme of work, reflected in a regional spatial plan, that will require Whilst the Framework is primarily a spatial plan that Mo te iti - mo te rahi For the little - for the large joint action and investment. This Foundation Report will describe a long-term vision for how the region will provides background for the Framework and outlines grow, change and respond to key urban development the challenges that need to be addressed regionally. challenges and opportunities, all of the above challenges will need to be resolved for the future, not This is the Foundation Report for the Wellington The region has an immediate issue relating to a lack just where and how to develop more housing. Regional Growth Framework (the Framework). The of housing supply, a limited range of housing options document outlines the context for the development of and declining housing affordability, particularly for first These are regional issues that are best dealt with the Framework (a regional spatial plan) and identifies home buyers. together and not individually. Many of these issues the key challenges for growth in the region. cross local council boundaries (e.g. investment in Increasing numbers of vehicles on the roads, capacity water or transport), and maximum benefit can be had For the purpose of the Framework and this Foundation and reliability issues associated with buses and trains from planning and investing in these together and not Report the region includes the territorial authorities of and network resilience issues are straining the regional individually and with central government and mana Masterton, Carterton, South Wairarapa, Upper Hutt, transport system and may not result in the necessary whenua. This work on the Wellington Regional Growth Lower Hutt, Wellington, Porirua, Kāpiti Coast and transport system shifts that we are seeking such as Framework provides an opportunity to further build on Horowhenua. This project is a collaboration between improving safety and access, reducing emissions and established relationships and partnerships with mana these councils, the Greater Wellington Regional Council, reducing reliance on private vehicle travel. whenua of the region. central government and mana whenua of the region. Other issues facing the region include projected sea This Foundation Report is a key milestone in the This report has been developed based on readily level rise, severity of weather events, environmental Wellington Regional Growth Framework project. The available data. Some parts of this report do not have stewardship pressure and natural hazards. All of which project partners will continue to work collectively and complete or consolidated information that extends are creating challenges as well as uncertainty. with other stakeholders on developing the Framework. to Horowhenua (as it may be based on the Greater The next phase of the project is development of an Wellington Regional Council area). We expect that Community infrastructure will also need more Options Report and work on this is currently underway. more up to date data will become available during coordinated investment to accommodate growth development of the Framework and additional work including open spaces, community facilities, schools may be commissioned. and health care facilities. Wellington Regional Growth Framework | 2 Contents Introduction ...........................................................................................................................2 Challenge 2: Impacts of natural hazards and climate change, improving resilience and enhancing the natural environment 29 The Wellington Regional Growth Framework ........................................................... 4 Natural Hazards and Climate Change 29 What is the Wellington Regional Growth Framework? 4 Assets at Risk 30 Why are we developing a Wellington Regional Growth Framework? 5 Natural Environment 32 Who is developing the Wellington Regional Growth Framework? 6 Challenge 3: Inequitable access 34 Building on the Wellington Regional Investment Plan and links to current projects 7 Inequitable Access 34 Context ....................................................................................................................................8 Access to Social Infrastructure 38 Tangata Whenua 8 Access to educational opportunities 39 Development of the Region 10 Challenge 4: Mana whenua and Māori access to affordable housing 40 The Region Today 11 Regional Profile 40 Our People 12 Why is poor access to housing a problem? 41 Our Housing 13 Housing development 41 Our Economy 15 Next Steps 42 Our Transport System 17 This Foundation Report 42 The Three Waters Infrastructure 20 Scenario Development 44 Our Environment, Natural Hazards and Climate Change 21 Shared Evidence Base – Technical Reports ............................................................. 45 Our Challenges ................................................................................................................... 23 Glossary ............................................................................................................................... 47 Challenge 1: Lack of sufficient and affordable housing supply and choice, investment needed in infrastructure 24 Housing – Affordability, Supply and Choice 24 Enabling Three Waters Infrastructure 27 Enabling Transport Infrastructure 28 Wellington Regional Growth Framework | 3 The Wellington Regional Growth Framework What is the Wellington Regional Growth Framework? The Wellington Regional Growth Framework (the resilience and natural hazards. It will seek to reflect the This Foundation Report completes the end of Phase Framework) is a spatial plan that will describe a long- housing and urban development aspirations of mana 1 of the project. It sets out our regional context, our term vision for how the region will grow, change and whenua in the region. initial evidence base using existing data sources, our respond to key urban development challenges and regional challenges, and presents the case for change. opportunities in a way that gets the best outcomes and It will draw on and incorporate the local and regional maximises the benefits across the region. planning and engagement work on growth that has During development of the Framework we expect that been undertaken already and be aligned with the more up to date data will become available and that It will develop and test possible future scenarios for the Transport Outcomes Framework and Government our partnership with mana whenua will evolve, so we region over the next 30 to 100 years. It will test the need Policy Statement on Land Transport Funding, the may commission additional work. for significant infrastructure and other investments and proposed National Policy Statements on Urban recommend a prioritised regional programme of work Development, Highly Productive Land, Freshwater Treaty of Waitangi obligations will be upheld by the that will require joint action and investment. Management and Biodiversity and the Governments’ Framework. Active engagement and collaboration between Urban Growth Agenda. project partners will be central to the development The Framework will identify where areas for housing, of the Framework. This includes a commitment to public transport and roads, three waters infrastructure Central Government, councils from the region and mana actively engage with mana whenua in good faith and (stormwater, wastewater and drinking water), whenua are working together to develop the Framework with a commonality of purpose. The Framework seeks businessesDiagram and 1: jobs, Phases are recommended of Wellington in the Regional context Growthand build an enduring regional growth partnership. to reflect mana whenua perspectives and recognises of issuesFramework such as housing affordability, climate change, the special relationship that tangata whenua have with The phases of the Framework are shown below. the environment and their role as kaitiaki. Diagram 1: Phases of Wellington Regional Growth Framework PHASE 4 PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 Finalise Develop Develop Develop Growth Foundation draft Growth Options Framework for Report Framework Report consultation Wellington Regional Growth FrameworkPHASE 4 | 4 PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 Finalise Develop Develop Develop Growth Foundation draft Growth Options Framework for Report Framework Report consultation Why are We Developing a Wellington Regional Growth Framework? The region is growing faster than it has done for many Community infrastructure will also need more override the Framework’s commitment to providing for decades and is facing immediate and longer-term coordinated
Recommended publications
  • Making a Community: Filipinos in Wellington

    Making a Community: Filipinos in Wellington

    Making a Community: Filipinos in Wellington September 2017 ISBN 978-0-9941409-4-4 (PDF) Making a Community: Filipinos in Wellington About the Author As an American living in New Zealand, I’ve been observing the debate here on immigration and multiculturalism. I arrived in Wellington last year with my Kiwi husband and three-year old son – and while settling in we’ve spent a lot of time discovering the delights of the city and its people. The experience also gave me some perspective on being a migrant far from home. I have a professional interest in South East Asian history, languages and culture - I just completed a PhD on the subject. I speak some Filipino, and am fascinated by the Philippines’ complex history. One of the major phenomena in the Philippines since the 1970s has been the growth of the global Filipino diaspora. That story has often been full of sadness. So I was intrigued by anecdotes of positivity and success from Wellington. Writing about how the migrant Filipino community has settled in New Zealand has been more than just a research project. It has highlighted how migration plays a role in community building. It also has meaning for me and my family’s future here. I really wanted to share some of the stories that I think reflect successful outcomes from immigration over the past thirty years. By Dr Rebecca Townsend 1 Key Points 1. 2. 3. Filipinos comprise 1 percent of Filipinos are a vital part of Most Filipinos in New Zealand are New Zealand’s population – the New Zealand’s dairy, healthcare, not Overseas Filipino Workers third largest Asian ethnic group construction, nursing, aged care, (OFW).
  • Local Government Leaders' Climate Change Declaration

    Local Government Leaders' Climate Change Declaration

    Local Government Leaders’ Climate Change Declaration In 2015, Mayors and Chairs of New Zealand declared an urgent need for responsive leadership and a holistic approach to climate change. We, the Mayors and Chairs of 2017, wholeheartedly support that call for action. Climate change presents significant opportunities, challenges and risks to communities throughout the world and in New Zealand. Local and regional government undertakes a wide range of activities that will be impacted by climate change and provides infrastructure and services useful in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and enhancing resilience. We have come together, as a group of Mayors and Chairs representing local government from across New Zealand to: 1. acknowledge the importance and urgent need to address climate change for the benefit of current and future generations; 2. give our support to the New Zealand Government for developing and implementing, in collaboration with councils, communities and businesses, an ambitious transition plan toward a low carbon and resilient New Zealand; 3. encourage Government to be more ambitious with climate change mitigation measures; 4. outline key commitments our councils will take in responding to the opportunities and risks posed by climate change; and 5. recommend important guiding principles for responding to climate change. We ask that the New Zealand Government make it a priority to develop and implement an ambitious transition plan for a low carbon and resilient New Zealand. We stress the benefits of early action to moderate the costs of adaptation to our communities. We are all too aware of challenges we face shoring up infrastructure and managing insurance costs.
  • Hawke's Bay Three Waters Detailed Analysis

    Hawke's Bay Three Waters Detailed Analysis

    Hawke’s Bay Three Waters © Morrison Low Business Case of Three Waters Service Delivery Options Except for all client data and factual information contained herein, this document is the copyright of Morrison Low. All or any partJuly of 20it 20 may only be used, copied or reproduced for the purpose for which it was originally intended, except where the prior permission to do otherwise has been sought from and granted by Morrison Low. Prospective users are invited to make enquiries of Morrison Low concerning using all or part of this copyright document for purposes other than that for which it was intended. Document status Ref Approving Director Date 2484 Dan Bonifant 17 May 2019 2484v2 Dan Bonifant 22 May 2019 2484v3 Dan Bonifant 21 June 2019 2484v4 Dan Bonifant 19 June 2020 2484v5 Dan Bonifant 03 July 2020 2484 Final Dan Bonifant 29 July 2020 © Morrison Low Except for all client data and factual information contained herein, this document is the copyright of Morrison Low. All or any part of it may only be used, copied or reproduced for the purpose for which it was originally intended, except where the prior permission to do otherwise has been sought from and granted by Morrison Low. Prospective users are invited to make enquiries of Morrison Low concerning using all or part of this copyright document for purposes other than that for which it was intended. Contents Executive Summary 1 Purpose of this review 1 The case for change 3 Introduction 21 National context - a timeline of reform 21 Regional context 24 Covid-19 25 Methodology 26 Project
  • Forbes Ecology

    Forbes Ecology

    Forbes Ecology South Wairarapa District Council WWTP, April 2013 Summary of Freshwater Periphyton Sample Processing & Results prepared by Ryder Consulting June 2013 Forbes Ecology South Wairarapa District Council WWTP: Freshwater Periphyton Summary April 2013 2 Forbes Ecology South Wairarapa District Council WWTP, April 2013 Summary of Freshwater Periphyton Sample Processing & Results prepared by Brian Stewart, PhD. Ben Ludgate, MSc. Ryder Consulting June 2013 Ryder Consulting Limited PO Box 1023 Dunedin New Zealand Ph: 03 477 2119 Fax: 03 477 3119 Ryder Consulting Forbes Ecology South Wairarapa District Council WWTP: Freshwater Periphyton Summary April 2013 3 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Background...................................................................................................................4 1.2 Objectives .....................................................................................................................4 2. Laboratory Analysis .......................................................................................................... 4 2.1 General..........................................................................................................................4 2.2 Chlorophyll a analysis ..................................................................................................4 2.3 Ash-Free Dry Mass (AFDM) .......................................................................................4
  • 13 Spring Creek

    13 Spring Creek

    Marlboroughtown Marshlands Rapaura Ravenscliff Spring Creek Tuamarina Waikakaho Wairau Bar Wairau Pa Marlboroughtown (1878- 1923) Spring Creek (1923-) Pre 1878 1873 4th June 1873 Marlborough Provincial Council meeting included: This morning petitions were presented by Mr Dodson in favour of a vote for. Marlboroughtown School; from 15 ratepayers, against the annexation of a portion of the County of Wairau to the Borough of Blenheim another vote of £100 for a Library and Public Room in Havelock was carried. Mr Dodson moved for a vote of £50 for the School in Marlboroughtown, but a vigorous discussion arose upon it regarding Educational finance, in which Mr Seymour announced that Government would not consent to the various items for school buildings, and upon the particular subject being put to the vote it was lost. 11th June 1873 The following petition, signed by fourteen persons, was presented .to the Provincial Council by Mr George Dodson; To his Honor the Superintendent and Provincial Council of Marlborough, in Council assembled We, the undersigned residents of Spring Creek and Marlboroughtown, do humbly beg that your Honorable Council will take into consideration this our humble petition. That we have for some years felt the necessity of establishing a school in our district, and having done so we now find a great difficulty in providing the necessary funds for its maintenance, and we do humbly pray that your Honorable Council will grant such assistance as will enable us to carry on the school successfully, as without your assistance the school must lapse, We have a Teacher engaged at a salary of Fifty (50) Pounds per annum, and since the commencement of the school the attendance has been steadily increasing showing at the present time a daily average of twenty (20) children.
  • Whaitua Te Whanganui-A-Tara

    Whaitua Te Whanganui-A-Tara

    Whaitua te Whanganui-a-Tara An overview of the Wellington City, Hutt Valley and Wainuiomata Wastewater and Stormwater networks and considerations of scenarios that were assessed to improve water quality Image courtesy of Wellington Water Limited – Moa Point Wastewater Treatment Plant James Blyth - Collaborations Report prepared by: Contractor for Greater Wellington 15 June 2020 Regional Council (GWRC) Report reviewed by: GWRC and Wellington Water Limited 20 June 2020 Final version released: 29 July 2020 DISCLAIMER This report has been prepared by an independent contractor (‘the contractor’, whom is a Director of Collaborations) working for Greater Wellington Regional Council (GWRC) and as such does not constitute Council policy. The document has been prepared for the Whaitua te Whanganui-a-Tara Committee using information collated from various sources, including Wellington Water, local councils (within the Whaitua) and national and international data. The purpose of the report is to provide the Committee an overview of the stormwater and wastewater networks to help guide recommendations and objective setting. In preparing this report, the author has used the best currently available data that was accessible during the project timeline, and has exercised all reasonable skill and care in presenting and interpreting these data. Nevertheless, the contractor and GWRC does not accept any liability, whether direct, indirect, or consequential, arising out of the provision of the data and associated information within this report for any use outside of its intended purpose. Furthermore, continuous improvement and collection is occurring on some of the data analysed and presented in this report, which may not represent the most current state or understanding of an issue.
  • District Plan Definition of Minimum Yard Requirements

    District Plan Definition of Minimum Yard Requirements

    DISTRICT PLAN DEFINITION OF MINIMUM YARD REQUIREMENTS This information sheet explains the District Plan Rules in relation to yard requirements, and how these should be measured to ensure that they comply with the City of Lower Hutt District Plan, or with an approved Resource Consent. Yard requirements should be measured from the property boundary to the closest part of the building, to include any cladding. It is therefore necessary to site the building slab and frame to ensure that cladding does not encroach upon the yard requirement. District Plan Interpretation Reason for yard rule in the City of Lower What this means is that no building, inclusive of Hutt District Plan its cladding, can be closer than 1.0 metre from The reason quoted in the District Plan for the yard the side and rear property boundaries, or 3.0 rule is as follows: metres from the front property boundary. This The yard spaces provide space around dwellings means that no part of a building (except those and accessory buildings to ensure the visual listed in the exceptions above in the definition of amenity values of the residential environment are building, or in the exceptions listed in the yard rule maintained or enhanced, to allow for maintenance above) can be closer. of the exterior of buildings, and provide a break Architectural drawings sometimes show between building frontages. measurements from the slab edge or building The front yard space is to ensure a setback is frame. However, in the case of resource consent provided to enhance the amenity values of the drawings the dimensions need to be shown from streetscape, and to provide a reasonable degree the cladding, if they are not, the yard requirements of privacy for residents.
  • Waikanae Park Population and Household Forecasts 2013 to 2043

    Waikanae Park Population and Household Forecasts 2013 to 2043

    Kāpiti Coast District Waikanae Park Population and household forecasts 2013 to 2043 population forecast Compiled and presented in forecast.id®. http://forecast.id.com.au/kapiti Table of contents About the forecast areas 1 Drivers of population change 6 Population summary 7 Population, households and dwellings 9 Population and age structure 12 Household types 14 Dwellings and development map 16 Population and age structure map 18 Household types map 20 Residential development 21 Net migration by age 22 Non-private dwellings 23 About the forecasts 24 Factors of population change 25 Household and suburb life cycles 27 Forecast modelling process 30 Glossary 32 copyright © 2017 .id Consulting Pty Ltd ACN 084 054 473. All rights reserved. Please read our Report Disclaimer and Copyright Notice which governs your use of this Report. Waikanae Park About the forecast areas Waikanae Park is bounded by the area above Ngarara Road and the locality of Waikanae Beach – Peka Peka to the north, the area bordering Nga Manu Nature Reserve, Waikanae Park and the locality of Waikanae-Reikorangi to the east, the Waikanae River to the south and the area close to Rutherford Drive and the locality of Waikanae Beach- Peka Peka to the west. The place name Waikanae is derived from the river of kanae (mullet) Hau saw while following Wairaka. Important Population 2017 Population 2043 Change 2017-43 Statistics 1,914 4,368 128.26% Forecast areas Waikanae Park Legend Kāpiti Coast Small areas v17.09.06-1.0.0 Source: Population and household forecasts, 2013 to 2043, prepared by .id, the population experts, February 2017.
  • Water Supply Annual Report for the Year Ended 30 June 2005 Contents

    Water Supply Annual Report for the Year Ended 30 June 2005 Contents

    Water supply annual report For the year ended 30 June 2005 Contents Introduction 2 Financial performance 3 Environmental performance 3 Social performance 6 Financial overview 13 Financial statements 14 Notes to the fi nancial statements 17 Performance indicators 23 Benchmarking of costs 27 Water sources 27 Resource consents 30 Distribution shutdowns 30 Water supplied to customers 30 Water quality 32 Quality management system 34 Environmental management system 39 Utility Services Committee members 45 Cover In the foreground, Old Haywards Road can be seen at the northern boundary of Transpower’s Haywards sub-station, running from Haywards Hill Road (at right) most of the way to State Highway 2. This route approximates the alignment of our Te Marua to Wellington water main. Roughly a third of the region’s reticulated water supply fl ows through the main at this point, which is relatively vulnerable to movement on the Wellington Fault. Plans to ‘toughen’ this section of the pipeline were fi nalised in June 2005. Construction of the new section, which will skirt the southern boundary of the substation, is under way. Credit: the Photo Library at GNS Science 1 Introduction Reporting scope Governance and organisation structure This report covers the main achievements and Greater Wellington’s water supply role is defi ned challenges for Greater Wellington Regional by the Wellington Regional Water Board Act Council’s bulk water supply activity (Greater (1972). Regional councillors are responsible Wellington Water), for the 12 months to 30 June for setting water supply policy; the regional 2005. council’s Utility Services Committee oversees the work programmes that we carry out.
  • EPA Board of Enquiry Hon Sir John Hanley David Bunting, Environment

    EPA Board of Enquiry Hon Sir John Hanley David Bunting, Environment

    EPA Board of Enquiry Hon Sir John Hanley David Bunting, Environment Commissioner Glenice Paine Mark Appledoorn Intro My name is Ruben Blok and I live at 79 Belvedere Ave, Waikanae. I am a Business Intelligence consultant with a private local firm and I create analytic reporting solutions for major private and public sector organisations throughout the Australasia. I am usually not too worried about government decisions but given my field of expertise and what I have witnessed with this project something very wrong is happening here and the information does simply not add up. I oppose the NZTA Makays to Peka Peka proposal and would like to tell you my experience and explain my findings. Lead Up We moved from Auckland to Kapiti (originally to Raumati South) in 2007 to start a family and fell in love with the community and surroundings. The combination of bush, beach, and lifestyle was an easy decision. We heard about KCDCs initial proposal to create a new alternate road and bridge to Waikanae I quite liked the idea. It seems a little crazy that you can almost walk to Waikanae from Paraparaumu Beach faster than you can drive (we tested it the other day). A year or two later we received the notification from NZTA that as part of the Roads of National Significance project they were planning to upgrade the existing SH1 to future proof the national grid. We again quite optimistic when we saw the proposals (WO and EO only) and chose option EO, upgrade the existing SH1, as it had minimal impact on the existing community leaving SH1 as close to its original location as possible.
  • Communitrak™ Survey

    Communitrak™ Survey

    COMMUNITRAK™ SURVEY PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS OF COUNCIL SERVICES AND REPRESENTATION PREPARED AS PART OF THE PUBLIC FEEDBACK PROGRAMME FOR: WHAKATĀNE DISTRICT COUNCIL MAY / JUNE 2019 National Research Bureau Ltd PO Box 10118, Mt Eden, Auckland, New Zealand P (09) 6300 655, www.nrb.co.nz CONTENTS Page No. A. SITUATION AND OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................. 1 B. COMMUNITRAK™ SPECIFICATIONS ................................................................................. 2 C. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 6 D. MAIN FINDINGS ..................................................................................................................... 26 1. Council Services/Facilities ............................................................................................ 27 a. Satisfaction With Council Services And Facilities ........................................... 28 i. Parks And Reserves .................................................................................. 28 ii. Sportsfields ................................................................................................ 31 iii. Street Lighting ........................................................................................... 34 iv. Public Toilets ............................................................................................. 37 v. Footpaths ..................................................................................................
  • Horowhenua District Council Independent Assessment Report | July 2017*

    Horowhenua District Council Independent Assessment Report | July 2017*

    Horowhenua District Council Independent assessment report | July 2017* An independent assessment report issued by the Independent Assessment Board for the CouncilMARK™ local government excellence programme. For more information visit www.councilmark.co.nz * Period of assessment: October 2016 Horowhenua District Council assessment report 1 Assessment Summary AT A GLANCE A growing and changing district with disparity of income, young/old age profile, and increasingly diverse ethnic make-up. The current situation Horowhenua District Council is in a period of transition. Assumptions of low growth were used in the Council’s Long Term Plan for 2015-25 and in its internal strategic plan. However, recent remodelling work has seen adjustments made to increase Horowhenua’s population projections, its housing demands, and employment and economic growth forecasts. These projections were lifted to better reflect: > the Wellington Northern Corridor, one of the Roads of National Significance (RoNS), whose completion is expected after 2024; Period of assessment The assessment looked at the current state of the Council and, > anticipated growth of small to medium-sized businesses, with given the changing environment, it also considered the likely Levin promoted as a service centre for the lower North Island; future demands of the community as well as the Council’s needs. and > the increasing attraction of the district for retail, lifestyle, The assessment occurred immediately before the October 2016 housing and retirement. elections, which saw a change of mayor and three new councillors elected (out of a total of 10 councillors). Because of these The Council is currently assessing where and how that growth will changes, an additional interview was conducted with the new occur.