Oreochromis Lepidurus (A Tilapia, No Common Name) Ecological Risk Screening Summary

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Oreochromis Lepidurus (A Tilapia, No Common Name) Ecological Risk Screening Summary Oreochromis lepidurus (a tilapia, no common name) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, March 2012 Revised, June 2018 Web Version, 5/14/2020 Organism Type: Fish Overall Risk Assessment Category: Uncertain 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2018): “Africa: lower Congo River basin in Democratic Republic of the Congo [Trewavas 1983]. Also reported from Angola [Thys van den Audenaerde 1963, 1964; Trewavas 1983], where it probably occurs in the lower Congo River and/or coastal rivers between the lower Congo and Bengo [Trewavas 1983].” “Lectotype from Angola, but without further details; however, as species is absent from Bengo and Quanza rivers, lectotype probably came from either the Angolan lower Congo River or from coastal rivers between this and the Bengo [Trewavas 1983] (M'Bridge, Loge, Dande). Present in northern Angolan coastal rivers according to [Thys van den Audenaerde 1964].” “Known from the lower Congo River [Democratic Republic of the Congo] [Boulenger 1915; Nichols and Griscom 1917; Thys van den Audenaerde 1963, 1964; Trewavas 1983], probably 1 only in brackish water [Trewavas 1983]. Reports from the middle Congo River [Boulenger 1915; Pellegrin 1928] questionable and unconfirmed by [Trewavas 1983], probably based in misidentified specimens.” Status in the United States No records of Oreochromis lepidurus in the wild or in trade in the United States were found. The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission has listed the tilapia O. lepidurus as a prohibited species. Prohibited nonnative species (FFWCC 2018), "are considered to be dangerous to the ecology and/or the health and welfare of the people of Florida. These species are not allowed to be personally possessed or used for commercial activities. Means of Introductions in the United States No records of Oreochromis lepidurus in the United States were found. Remarks No additional remarks. 2 Biology and Ecology Taxonomic Hierarchy and Taxonomic Standing According to Eschmeyer et al. (2018), Oreochromis lepidurus (Boulenger 1899) is the valid name for this species. From ITIS (2018): Kingdom Animalia Subkingdom Bilateria Infrakingdom Deuterostomia Phylum Chordata Subphylum Vertebrata Infraphylum Gnathostomata Superclass Actinopterygii Class Teleostei Superorder Acanthopterygii Order Perciformes Suborder Labroidei Family Cichlidae Genus Oreochromis Species Oreochromis lepidurus (Boulenger, 1899) Size, Weight, and Age Range From Froese and Pauly (2018): “Max length : 19.0 cm TL male/unsexed; [Boulenger 1915]” 2 Environment From Froese and Pauly (2018): “Freshwater; brackish; benthopelagic.” Climate From Froese and Pauly (2018): “Tropical” Distribution Outside the United States Native From Froese and Pauly (2018): “Africa: lower Congo River basin in Democratic Republic of the Congo [Trewavas 1983]. Also reported from Angola [Thys van den Audenaerde 1963, 1964; Trewavas 1983], where it probably occurs in the lower Congo River and/or coastal rivers between the lower Congo and Bengo [Trewavas 1983].” “Lectotype from Angola, but without further details; however, as species is absent from Bengo and Quanza rivers, lectotype probably came from either the Angolan lower Congo River or from coastal rivers between this and the Bengo [Trewavas 1983] (M'Bridge, Loge, Dande). Present in northern Angolan coastal rivers according to [Thys van den Audenaerde 1964].” “Known from the lower Congo River [Democratic Republic of the Congo] [Boulenger 1915; Nichols and Griscom 1917; Thys van den Audenaerde 1963, 1964; Trewavas 1983], probably only in brackish water [Trewavas 1983]. Reports from the middle Congo River [Boulenger 1915; Pellegrin 1928] questionable and unconfirmed by [Trewavas 1983], probably based in misidentified specimens.” Introduced No records of Oreochromis lepidurus introductions were found. Means of Introduction Outside the United States No records of Oreochromis lepidurus introductions were found. Short Description From Froese and Pauly (2018): “Dorsal spines (total): 15 - 17; Dorsal soft rays (total): 9-12; Anal spines: 3; Anal soft rays: 8 - 9; Vertebrae: 28. Diagnosis: mature male with tuberculate genital papilla, some of the tubercles prolonged into filaments [Trewavas 1983]. Caudal fin of adults densely scaled, usually with a reticulate melanin pattern [Thys van den Audenaerde 1964; Trewavas 1983]. 28 vertebrae; total 3 dorsal rays 24-27; 19-24 lower gill-rakers; in adults snout long, preorbital bone deep and blade of lower pharyngeal 2-2.3 times the median length of the toothed area; outer teeth of jaws bicuspid unless by wearing down of minor cusp [Trewavas 1983].” “Description: […] Mouth rather small [Boulenger 1915]. Maxillary extending to between nostril and eye [Boulenger 1899, 1901, 1915; Pellegrin 1904; Thys van den Audenaerde 1964]. […] Scales on cheek in 2 or usually 3 rows [Boulenger 1899, 1901, 1915; Trewavas 1983], width of scaly part less than diameter of eye [Boulenger 1915]. Eye equal to or a little less than preorbital depth [Boulenger 1915]. […]; 5 scales between bases of pectoral and pelvic fins [Trewavas 1983]. Opercular scales large [Boulenger 1899, 1901; Pellegrin 1904]. […] 17-21 scales in upper part of lateral line, 11-13 in lower part [Boulenger 1915]. Last dorsal fin spine longest; third anal fin spine nearly as long as last dorsal fin spine [Boulenger 1899, 1901, 1915]. Dorsal fin almost reaching base of caudal fin in juveniles anterior third of caudal fin in adults; anal fin reaching as far as dorsal fin [Thys van den Audenaerde 1964]. Pectoral fin as long as or a little longer than head [Boulenger 1899, 1901, 1915; Pellegrin 1904], reaching vent [Thys van den Audenaerde 1964]. Pelvic fins never reaching anal fin but generally reaching a little further than pectoral fins [Thys van den Audenaerde 1964]. Caudal fin densely scaled [Boulenger 1899, 1901, 1915; Pellegrin 1904; Thys van den Audenaerde 1964; Trewavas 1983], with straight posterior border and hardly rounded corners [Thys van den Audenaerde 1964]. Caudal peduncle deeper than long [Boulenger 1899, 1901, 1915; Pellegrin 1904]. Bifid tassel of tubercles and filaments on the male genital papilla [Trewavas 1983].” “Coloration: […] In life: upper part of head and back green-brown; flanks paler brownish yellow; 6-8 dark brownish vertical bands on upper flanks; scales on flanks with brownish red spot in the middle; chest and belly yellowish, turning reddish when sexually mature; dorsal fin pale green-brown with a pale horizontal band; soft dorsal with irregular pale stripes or spots; Tilapia-mark clearly present but vaguely outlined; anal fin olive-green to brown, with less spots than dorsal fin; caudal fin brown with irregular light stripes or spots; juveniles silvery [Thys van den Audenaerde 1964].” Biology From Froese and Pauly (2018): “Microphagous, using plankton [Thys van den Audenaerde 1964; Trewavas 1983]. Maternal, ovophilic mouthbrooder [Lamboj 2004].” Human Uses From Moelants (2010): “This species is harvested for human consumption.” Diseases No records of OIE-reportable diseases (OIE 2020) were found for Oreochromis lepidurus. Poelen et al. (2014) list Gyrodactylus niloticus and G. shariffi as parasites of O. lepidurus. 4 Threat to Humans From Froese and Pauly (2018): “Harmless” 3 Impacts of Introductions No records of Oreochromis lepidurus introductions were found. O. lepidurus is a prohibited species in Florida (FFWCC 2018). 4 History of Invasiveness Oreochromis lepidurus is a tilapia species native to the lower Congo River basin in Democratic Republic of Africa. No known successful introductions exist. History of invasiveness is No Known Nonnative Population. 5 Global Distribution Figure 1. Known global distribution of Oreochromis lepidurus. Locations are in Angola and Democratic Republic of the Congo. Map from GBIF Secretariat (2018). 5 Figure 2. Additional known global distribution of Oreochromis lepidurus. Locations are in Democratic Republic of the Congo. Map created with data from Froese and Pauly (2018). 6 Distribution Within the United States No records of Oreochromis lepiuruds in the United States were found. 6 7 Climate Matching Summary of Climate Matching Analysis The climate match for Oreochromis lepidurus was mostly low for the contiguous United States. Southern peninsular Florida had a medium match. The Climate 6 score (Sanders et al. 2018; 16 climate variables; Euclidean distance) for the contiguous United States was 0.001, low (scores between 0.000 and 0.005, inclusive, are classified as low). The individual climate 6 score for Florida was medium; all other States had low climate scores. Figure 3. RAMP (Sanders et al. 2018) source map showing weather stations in western central Africa selected as source locations (red; Angola, Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Republic of the Congo) and non-source locations (gray) for Oreochromis lepidurus climate matching. Source locations from Froese and Pauly (2018) and GBIF Secretariat (2018). Selected source locations are within 100 km of one or more species occurrences, and do not necessarily represent the locations of occurrences themselves. 7 Figure 4. Map of RAMP (Sanders et al. 2018) climate matches for Oreochromis lepidurus in the contiguous United States based on source locations reported by Froese and Pauly (2018) and GBIF Secretariat (2018). Counts of climate match scores are tabulated on the left. 0/Blue = Lowest match, 10/Red = Highest match. The High, Medium, and Low Climate match Categories are based on the following
Recommended publications
  • Alcolapia Grahami ERSS
    Lake Magadi Tilapia (Alcolapia grahami) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, March 2015 Revised, August 2017, October 2017 Web Version, 8/21/2018 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Bayona and Akinyi (2006): “The natural range of this species is restricted to a single location: Lake Magadi [Kenya].” Status in the United States No records of Alcolapia grahami in the wild or in trade in the United States were found. The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission has listed the tilapia Alcolapia grahami as a prohibited species. Prohibited nonnative species (FFWCC 2018), “are considered to be dangerous to the ecology and/or the health and welfare of the people of Florida. These species are not allowed to be personally possessed or used for commercial activities.” Means of Introductions in the United States No records of Alcolapia grahami in the United States were found. 1 Remarks From Bayona and Akinyi (2006): “Vulnerable D2 ver 3.1” Various sources use Alcolapia grahami (Eschmeyer et al. 2017) or Oreochromis grahami (ITIS 2017) as the accepted name for this species. Information searches were conducted under both names to ensure completeness of the data gathered. 2 Biology and Ecology Taxonomic Hierarchy and Taxonomic Standing According to Eschmeyer et al. (2017), Alcolapia grahami (Boulenger 1912) is the current valid name for this species. It was originally described as Tilapia grahami; it has also been known as Oreoghromis grahami, and as a synonym, but valid subspecies, of
    [Show full text]
  • Humboldt Bay Fishes
    Humboldt Bay Fishes ><((((º>`·._ .·´¯`·. _ .·´¯`·. ><((((º> ·´¯`·._.·´¯`·.. ><((((º>`·._ .·´¯`·. _ .·´¯`·. ><((((º> Acknowledgements The Humboldt Bay Harbor District would like to offer our sincere thanks and appreciation to the authors and photographers who have allowed us to use their work in this report. Photography and Illustrations We would like to thank the photographers and illustrators who have so graciously donated the use of their images for this publication. Andrey Dolgor Dan Gotshall Polar Research Institute of Marine Sea Challengers, Inc. Fisheries And Oceanography [email protected] [email protected] Michael Lanboeuf Milton Love [email protected] Marine Science Institute [email protected] Stephen Metherell Jacques Moreau [email protected] [email protected] Bernd Ueberschaer Clinton Bauder [email protected] [email protected] Fish descriptions contained in this report are from: Froese, R. and Pauly, D. Editors. 2003 FishBase. Worldwide Web electronic publication. http://www.fishbase.org/ 13 August 2003 Photographer Fish Photographer Bauder, Clinton wolf-eel Gotshall, Daniel W scalyhead sculpin Bauder, Clinton blackeye goby Gotshall, Daniel W speckled sanddab Bauder, Clinton spotted cusk-eel Gotshall, Daniel W. bocaccio Bauder, Clinton tube-snout Gotshall, Daniel W. brown rockfish Gotshall, Daniel W. yellowtail rockfish Flescher, Don american shad Gotshall, Daniel W. dover sole Flescher, Don stripped bass Gotshall, Daniel W. pacific sanddab Gotshall, Daniel W. kelp greenling Garcia-Franco, Mauricio louvar
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of Arctic Marine Fishes: Taxonomy and Zoogeography
    Mar Biodiv DOI 10.1007/s12526-010-0070-z ARCTIC OCEAN DIVERSITY SYNTHESIS Biodiversity of arctic marine fishes: taxonomy and zoogeography Catherine W. Mecklenburg & Peter Rask Møller & Dirk Steinke Received: 3 June 2010 /Revised: 23 September 2010 /Accepted: 1 November 2010 # Senckenberg, Gesellschaft für Naturforschung and Springer 2010 Abstract Taxonomic and distributional information on each Six families in Cottoidei with 72 species and five in fish species found in arctic marine waters is reviewed, and a Zoarcoidei with 55 species account for more than half list of families and species with commentary on distributional (52.5%) the species. This study produced CO1 sequences for records is presented. The list incorporates results from 106 of the 242 species. Sequence variability in the barcode examination of museum collections of arctic marine fishes region permits discrimination of all species. The average dating back to the 1830s. It also incorporates results from sequence variation within species was 0.3% (range 0–3.5%), DNA barcoding, used to complement morphological charac- while the average genetic distance between congeners was ters in evaluating problematic taxa and to assist in identifica- 4.7% (range 3.7–13.3%). The CO1 sequences support tion of specimens collected in recent expeditions. Barcoding taxonomic separation of some species, such as Osmerus results are depicted in a neighbor-joining tree of 880 CO1 dentex and O. mordax and Liparis bathyarcticus and L. (cytochrome c oxidase 1 gene) sequences distributed among gibbus; and synonymy of others, like Myoxocephalus 165 species from the arctic region and adjacent waters, and verrucosus in M. scorpius and Gymnelus knipowitschi in discussed in the family reviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Observation on the Urinogenital Papilla and Sexual Dimorphism in Some Indian Gobiids (Gobiidae: Teleostei)
    Observation on the urinogenital papilla and sexual dimorphism in some Indian gobiids (Gobiidae: Teleostei) Item Type article Authors Har, S.P. Download date 05/10/2021 03:51:48 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/32378 Journal of the Indian Fisheries Association 7 27,2000, 7-17 OBSERVATION ON THE URINOGENITAL PAPILLA AND SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN SOME INDIAN GOBIIDS (GOBIIDAE: TELEOSTEI) SAKTI HAR Department of Zoology, Ranwnanda College, Bishnupur, Bankura-722122. W. Bengal, India. ABSTRACT A thorough comparative study on the urinogenital papilla and sexual dimorphism has been made for the first time in both the sexes of twelve Indian gobiids- Glassogobius giuris (Han1ilton); Acentrogobius cyanomos (Bleeker); Eleotriodes muralis (Valenciennes); Parapocryptes serperaster (Richardson); Apocryptes bato (Hamilton); Scartclaos viridis (Hamilton); Boleophthalmus boddarti (Pallas), Periophthalmus schlosseri (Pallas); P. koelreuteri (Pallas); Taenioides anguillaris (Linnaeus); T. buchanani (Day); Odontamblyopus rubicundus (Hamilton). The urinogenital papilla, originating as a free muscular organ from the ventral surface of the body-wall and shortly behind anus, is present in both the sexes. It is an important organ of primary sex recognition in all species. In case of male the papilla is conical, broad at the base and in female it is either flattened, distally truncated or bluntly rounded. The presence of permanent colour mark over the specific region of the body surface is another secondary sexual character in a few species. Besides, colouration may also be a nuptial secondary sex character developed in some during peak breeding season. The enlargement and colouration of the organ is subject to seasonal variations parallel to the seasonal gonadal cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals
    Jelle Atema Richard R. Fay Arthur N. Popper William N. Tavolga Editors Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals Springer-Verlag New York Berlin Heidelberg London Paris Tokyo JELLE ATEMA, Boston University Marine Program, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA Richard R. Fay, Parmly Hearing Institute, Loyola University, Chicago, Illinois 60626, USA ARTHUR N. POPPER, Department of Zoology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA WILLIAM N. TAVOLGA, Mote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota, Florida 33577, USA The cover Illustration is a reproduction of Figure 13.3, p. 343 of this volume Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Sensory biology of aquatic animals. Papers based on presentations given at an International Conference on the Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals held, June 24-28, 1985, at the Mote Marine Laboratory in Sarasota, Fla. Bibliography: p. Includes indexes. 1. Aquatic animals—Physiology—Congresses. 2. Senses and Sensation—Congresses. I. Atema, Jelle. II. International Conference on the Sensory Biology - . of Aquatic Animals (1985 : Sarasota, Fla.) QL120.S46 1987 591.92 87-9632 © 1988 by Springer-Verlag New York Inc. x —• All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer-Verlag, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York 10010, U.S.A.), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of Information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, Computer Software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Digenea: Opecoelidae
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Scott aG rdner Publications & Papers Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of 2017 Pseudopecoelus mccauleyi n. sp. and Podocotyle sp. (Digenea: Opecoelidae) from the Deep Waters off Oregon and British Columbia with an Updated Key to the Species of Pseudopecoelus von Wicklen, 1946 and Checklist of Parasites from Lycodes cortezianus (Perciformes: Zoarcidae) Charles K. Blend Corpus Christi, Texas, [email protected] Norman O. Dronen Texas A & M University, [email protected] Gábor R. Rácz University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Scott yL ell Gardner FUonilvloerwsit ythi of sN aendbras akdda - Litiionncolaln, slwg@unlorks a.etdu: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/slg Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, Biodiversity Commons, Biology Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Marine Biology Commons, and the Parasitology Commons Blend, Charles K.; Dronen, Norman O.; Rácz, Gábor R.; and Gardner, Scott yL ell, "Pseudopecoelus mccauleyi n. sp. and Podocotyle sp. (Digenea: Opecoelidae) from the Deep Waters off Oregon and British Columbia with an Updated Key to the Species of Pseudopecoelus von Wicklen, 1946 and Checklist of Parasites from Lycodes cortezianus (Perciformes: Zoarcidae)" (2017). Scott aG rdner Publications & Papers. 3. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/slg/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scott aG rdner Publications & Papers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Blend, Dronen, Racz, & Gardner in Acta Parasitologica (2017) 62(2). Copyright 2017, W. Stefański Institute of Parasitology.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Coastal Marine Fishes of California
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME FISH BULLETIN 157 GUIDE TO THE COASTAL MARINE FISHES OF CALIFORNIA by DANIEL J. MILLER and ROBERT N. LEA Marine Resources Region 1972 ABSTRACT This is a comprehensive identification guide encompassing all shallow marine fishes within California waters. Geographic range limits, maximum size, depth range, a brief color description, and some meristic counts including, if available: fin ray counts, lateral line pores, lateral line scales, gill rakers, and vertebrae are given. Body proportions and shapes are used in the keys and a state- ment concerning the rarity or commonness in California is given for each species. In all, 554 species are described. Three of these have not been re- corded or confirmed as occurring in California waters but are included since they are apt to appear. The remainder have been recorded as occurring in an area between the Mexican and Oregon borders and offshore to at least 50 miles. Five of California species as yet have not been named or described, and ichthyologists studying these new forms have given information on identification to enable inclusion here. A dichotomous key to 144 families includes an outline figure of a repre- sentative for all but two families. Keys are presented for all larger families, and diagnostic features are pointed out on most of the figures. Illustrations are presented for all but eight species. Of the 554 species, 439 are found primarily in depths less than 400 ft., 48 are meso- or bathypelagic species, and 67 are deepwater bottom dwelling forms rarely taken in less than 400 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Fish Taxonomic Key 2017 Edition
    Minnesota Fish Taxonomic Key 2017 Edition Pictures from – NANFA (2017) Warren Lamb Aquatic Biology Program Bemidji State University Bemidji, MN 56601 Introduction Minnesota’s landscape is maze of lakes and river that are home to a recorded total of 163 species of fish. This document is a complete and current dichotomous taxonomic key of the Minnesota fishes. This key was based on the 1972 “Northern Fishes” key (Eddy 1972), and updated based on Dr. Jay Hatch’s article “Minnesota Fishes: Just How Many Are There?” (Hatch 2016). Any new species or family additions were also referenced to the 7th edition of the American Fisheries society “Names of North American Fishes” (Page et al. 2013) to assess whether a fish species is currently recognized by the scientific community. Identifying characteristics for new additions were compared to those found in Page and Burr (2011). In total five species and one family have been added to the taxonomic key, while three have been removed since the last publication. Species pictures within the keys have been provide from either Bemidji State University Ichthyology Students or North American Native Fish Association (NANFA). My hope is that this document will offer an accurate and simple key so anyone can identify the fish they may encounter in Minnesota. Warren Lamb – 2017 Pictures from – NANFA (2017) References Eddy, S. and J. C. Underhill. 1974. Northern Fishes. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. 414 pp. Hatch, J. 2015. Minnesota fishes: just how many are there anyway? American Currents 40:10-21. Page, L. M. and B. M. Burr. 2011. Peterson Field Guide to Freshwater Fishes of North America North of Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • A Check-List of the Fishes of the Great Lakes and Tributary Waters, with Nomenclatorial Notes and Analytical Keys
    UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY Miscellaneous Publications No. 15 A Check-List of the Fishes of the Great Lakes and Tributary Waters, with Nomenclatorial Notes and Analytical Keys BY CARL L. HUBBS ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN ,PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY July 7, 1926 UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY Miscellaneous Publications No. 15 A Check-List of the Fishes of the Great Lakes and Tributary Waters, with Nomenclatorial Notes and Analytical Keys BY CARL 1,. HUBBS ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN PUBLISI-IED BY TI-IE UNIVERSITY July 7, 1926 The publications of the RXuseuin of Zoology, University of INichigan, consist of two serics-the Occasional Papers and the Miscellaneous Publi- cations. Both series were founded by Dr. Bryant JTTall~e~,Mr. Bradshaw I-I. Swalcs and Dr. W. W. Newcomb. The Occasional Papers, publication of which was begun in 1913, scrve as a medium for the publicatioil of brief original papers based principally upon the collrctions i11 the Museum. The papers arc issued separately to libraries and specialists, and when a sufficient number of pages have been printed to malie a volume, a titlc page, index, and table of contcnts arc sup- plied to libraries and individuals on the mailing list lor the entire scries. The Aliscellaneous Publications include papers on ficld and museum technique, monographic studies and other papers not within the scope of the Occasional Papers. The papers arc published separately, and, as it is not intended that they shall be grouped into volumes, each nuillher has a title page and, when izccessary, a table of contents. ALEXANDERG. RUTHVEN, Director of the Museum of Zoology, TJniversity of Michigan.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Dissection Guide
    Fish dissection guide Internal Anatomy: 1. Incision at anus . Begin by inserting a fine scalpel blade 4. Cut along isthmus . Use scissors to cut anteriorly through into the anus (also called the vent) of the fish. The anus is located the bones attached to the pelvic fins. Cut forward along the just anterior to (in front of) the anal fin, on the ventral (lower) side narrow, fleshy space beneath the head and between the gill of the fish in most fishes. covers. The gill covers (also known as operculae) are flaps which lie along both sides of the head and protect the underlying gills. 2. Cutting anteriorly. The incision is then extended anteriorly along the fish's belly towards the head. 5. Body cavity. Pull apart the two walls of the body cavity and expose the internal organs (see next image for names). The neat incision now runs from the anus forward between the two pelvic fins and along the isthmus. 3. Cut between pelvic fins . The incision passes anteriorly between the pelvic (ventral) fins. Depending on the type of fish, these paired fins are used to stabilise the fish when swimming and also for braking. The pelvic fins are supported by the bones of the . Some of the ventrally located internal pelvic girdle which are anchored in the belly muscles. 6. Internal organs organs: 1 heart, 2 Liver, 3 Pyloric caecae, 4 adipose (fatty) tissue 7. Pull aside gut. Here the adipose tissue (1) and gut (2) are 10. Swim bladder exposed. The other organs have been pulled aside to expose the swim bladder (3), gonads (4) and removed to expose the swim bladder at the top of the body kidneys (5).
    [Show full text]
  • The Causes and Consequences of Variation in Agonistic Behavior in the Bluebanded Goby (Lythrypnus Dalli)
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Neuroscience Institute Dissertations Neuroscience Institute 12-18-2014 The Causes and Consequences of Variation in Agonistic Behavior in the Bluebanded Goby (Lythrypnus dalli) Tessa Solomon-Lane Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/neurosci_diss Recommended Citation Solomon-Lane, Tessa, "The Causes and Consequences of Variation in Agonistic Behavior in the Bluebanded Goby (Lythrypnus dalli)." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2014. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/neurosci_diss/14 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Neuroscience Institute at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Neuroscience Institute Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF VARIATION IN AGONISTIC BEHAVIOR IN THE BLUEBANDED GOBY (LYTHRYPNUS DALLI) by TESSA K. SOLOMON-LANE Under the Direction of Matthew S. Grober, Ph.D. ABSTRACT Social species are faced with the challenge of navigating a lifetime of dynamic social contexts. Social behavior is a critical target for natural selection because expressing behaviors appropriate for a given social context has important fitness consequences. Context-specific behavior is promoted by proximate regulators that are reciprocally influenced by behavioral expression and the social environment, such as hormones and social experience. This dissertation utilizes an integrative approach to investigate the causes and consequences of variation in agonistic behavior in the bluebanded goby (Lythrypnus dalli) across a range of relevant social contexts. This highly social, sex changing fish forms linear hierarchies of a dominant male and multiple subordinate females, and patterns of agonistic interaction are strongly linked to reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogenetic Analysis of the AIG Family in Vertebrates
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Communication Molecular Phylogenetic Analysis of the AIG Family in Vertebrates Yuqi Huang 1,†, Minghao Sun 2,† , Lenan Zhuang 2,* and Jin He 1,* 1 Department of Animal Science, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; [email protected] 2 Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (L.Z.); [email protected] (J.H.); Tel.: +86-15-8361-28207 (L.Z.); +86-17-6818-74822 (J.H.) † These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: Androgen-inducible genes (AIGs), which can be regulated by androgen level, constitute a group of genes characterized by the presence of the AIG/FAR-17a domain in its protein sequence. Previous studies on AIGs demonstrated that one member of the gene family, AIG1, is involved in many biological processes in cancer cell lines and that ADTRP is associated with cardiovascular diseases. It has been shown that the numbers of AIG paralogs in humans, mice, and zebrafish are 2, 2, and 3, respectively, indicating possible gene duplication events during vertebrate evolution. Therefore, classifying subgroups of AIGs and identifying the homologs of each AIG member are important to characterize this novel gene family further. In this study, vertebrate AIGs were phyloge- netically grouped into three major clades, ADTRP, AIG1, and AIG-L, with AIG-L also evident in an outgroup consisting of invertebrsate species. In this case, AIG-L, as the ancestral AIG, gave rise to ADTRP and AIG1 after two rounds of whole-genome duplications during vertebrate evolution.
    [Show full text]