Retinal Growth in Foveated Teleosts: Nasotemporal Asymmetry Keeps the Fovea in Temporal Retina

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Retinal Growth in Foveated Teleosts: Nasotemporal Asymmetry Keeps the Fovea in Temporal Retina The Journal of Neuroscience, June 1992. 12(6): 2381-2392 Retinal Growth in Foveated Teleosts: Nasotemporal Asymmetry Keeps the Fovea in Temporal Retina Stephen S. Easter, Jr. Department of Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1048 and Vision, Touch, and Hearing Research Centre, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4067, Australia Fish retinas continue to grow throughout life by adding neu- the inflation of the eye, and active, as new cells are added. Rods rons at the margin, with the result that cells born at a pe- are added interstitially throughout the retina (Johns and Fer- ripheral site are steadily displaced toward the center of the nald, 1981; Raymond and Rivlin, 1987) but all the other cell enlarging retina. This presents a functional problem for fish types are added at the margin, where stem cells proliferate to with specialized temporal areas such as a fovea-how to produce more stem cells and postmitotic neuroblasts (Muller, reconcile continual growth with the maintenance of a tem- 1952; Hollyfield, 1972; Johns, 1977). The stem cells continue poral location for the fovea. One possibility is that the retina to proliferate on the margin; the postmitotic cells remain just grows asymmetrically, with most new retina added nasally, inside it, and differentiate into the various types of retinal neu- relatively little temporally. ron. The new neurons thus form an annulus around the edgeof I have tested this hypothesis by evaluating retinal growth the eye, central to the marginal germinal zone from which they in marine teleosts from 15 families, both foveated and un- recently emerged,and peripheral to the preceding generation of foveated. The pattern of growth was revealed by exploiting neurons (Scholes, 1979; Rusoff and Easter, 1980). the fact that each new generation of ganglion cells sends Such appositional addition of new annuli provides an inter- its axons into the optic nerve as a cohort; small grains of esting complication for vision, In goldfish, for example, the eyes the carbocyanine dye 1 ,l’-dioctadecyl-3,3,3’,3’-tetramethyl- of large and small fish are conformal; in both, the retina subtends indocarbocyanine were applied to various sites in the cross the samevisual angle, about half of a hemisphere,and the optic section of the optic nerves of adults, and the retrogradely disk lies approximately at the center (Easter et al., 1977). These labeled cell bodies in the retina were visualized in whole- facts, coupled with the annular mode of cell addition, imply mounts. The labeled cells lay in annuli, each one a generation that as the eye grows, the receptive fields of retinal neurons must of ganglion cells. continually move from the periphery toward the center of the Representatives of seven of the families showed clearly retina’s visual field. For instance, a ganglion cell born on the asymmetric growth: the labeled annuli were close together temporal margin would initially have its receptive field in front on the temporal side and more distant nasally, the embryonic of the fish, but as new cells are added to the margin, this same fissure curved from its ventral origin toward the temporal cell’s receptive field would shift laterally and posteriorly. How side, and in six of these families, labeled fibers from tem- the brain managesthis ever-changing relationship with the out- poral retina skirted the fovea. Members of the other eight side world is completely unknown, but the problem is slightly families, without specialized areas, had more symmetric ret- simplified by the fact that the goldfish retina lacks a specialized inal growth: labeled annuli were equally spaced on all sides, urea; that is, a region of high cell density (RHCD) (Johns and the embryonic fissure was vertical, and there were no skirt- Easter, 1977). Becausecell density varies relatively little with ing fibers. position, one part of the retina is probably functionally equiv- The following hypothesis is supported: the retina grows alent to another, and the retinal modules that are added at the asymmetrically, and maintains the area for acute vision ori- edge resemblethose everywhere elsein the retina. ented toward the anterior field. The problem of reconciling annular growth with vision is more complicated in those fish with an RHCD. Walls (1942, p The retina of a teleost fish grows throughout much of the ani- 304) lists 24 teleost species,from 13 genera, that have a fovea mal’s life (Muller, 1952; Johns and Easter, 1977; Meyer, 1978). (an RHCD marked by a pit in the inner limiting membrane), The enlargement is both passive, as the retina is stretched by and notes that many others have areue that are RHCDs not associatedwith a pit (for examples, see Collin and Pettigrew, 1988a,b). Presumably these RHCDs-fovea or area-are spe- Received Dec. 4, 199 1; accepted Jan. 16, 1992. cialized for high resolution (Collin and Pettigrew, 1989), as in This work was carried out while on sabbatical leave at the Vision, Touch, and the human eye. The fish fovea differs structurally from the hu- Hearing Centre, with support from the Australian Research Council and NIH man fovea, however, in that it has all the retinal layers present Research Grant EY-00168. I thank Prof. Jack Pettigrew, Dr. David Vaney, and others at the Centre for their help and hospitality. I thank Ms. Rita Collins and except that of the optic fibers. The ganglion cell layer lies at the Celeste Malinoski for doing the histology, and Drs. David Cameron, Peter Hitch- bottom of the pit, the walls of which are formed by the mounded cock, Jack Pettigrew, Pamela Raymond, John Scholes, Steve Wilson, Ms. Riva optic axons. Marcus, and Mr. John Burrill for their comments on the manuscript. Correspondence should be addressed to Stephen S. Easter, Jr., Department of In almost all fish that have one, the RHCD is in far temporal Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48 109- 1048. retina, and this location is vulnerable to the effects of annular Copyright 0 1992 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/92/122381-12$05.00/O growth. How can a temporal RHCD remain temporal, and avoid 2382 Easter - Asymmetric Retinal Growth Table 1. Types of fish examined in this study, grouped according to et al., 198 l), so if a smallquantity of retrogradetracer is appliedto a whether the retina grew symmetrically or asymmetrically (see Results) fascicle, an annulus ofganglion cells is labeled (Rusoff and Easter, 198 1). Most of the fish described below had ribbon-shaped optic nerves (Tapp, 1973; Anders and Hibbard, 1974), in which sequential generations of Symmetric growth axons are laid out linearly along the ribbon, oldest at the central end, 1. Acanthuridae (surgeon fish) youngest at the peripheral (ventral) end (Scholes, 1979). Thus, it was a. Purucun~hurus hepatus (blue tang) (1) possible to apply tracer at a particular site in the cross section of the 2. Blenniidae (blennies) nerve and predict the approximate retinal location of the labeled cells. a. Sulurius sinuosus (fringelip blenny) (2) Fish were obtained by netting at the Heron Island Research Station b. Zstiblennius edentulu (rippled rockskipper) (2) on the Great Barrier Reef, in a trawl on Moreton Bay, and by purchase 3. Chaetodontidae (butterfly fish and coral fish) from a local pet store. Individual fish were anesthetized by immersion a. Chelmon rostrutus (beaked coral fish) (2) in a 0.1% solution of tricaine methane sulfonate, and after the aorta 4. Gobiidae (gobies) was cut, both eyes were removed with a stump of the optic nerve at- a. Buthygobiusfuscus (common goby) (2) tached. The cornea, lens, and iris were removed, and the fish’s standard 5. Mullidae (goatfish) length and lens diameter were recorded. Both eye cups were fixed by a. Upeneus trugulu (freckled goatfish) (2) immersion in 2% or 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer 6. Opistognathidae Cjawfish) at room temperature for 4 hr to 2 weeks. The dye l,l’-dioctadecyl- a. Unidentified (1) 3,3,3’,3’-tetramethylindocarbocyanine (DiI; obtained from Molecular 7. Pomacentridae (damselfish) Probes) (Honig and Hume, 1986), which diffuses in the plasma mem- a. Duscyllus uruanus (humbug dascyllus) (1) brane in fixed tissue (Godement et al., 1987), was applied to one or b. Chrysiptera unimuculatu (one-spot damselfish) (1) more sites on the optic nerve stumps, or intraretinally, and the tissue 8. Syngnathidae (pipe fish and sea horses) was returned to fix at 37°C. After a suitable interval (4 d to 2 weeks, a. Truchyrhumphus bioarctutus (short-tailed pipefish) (1) determined by examining the intact tissue in a fluorescence microscope), b. Hippocampus kudu (spotted sea horse) (1) the tissue was prepared for whole-mounting. The retina and adherent c. Unidentified (sea horse) (1) pigmented epithelium were dissected away as a unit from the rest of Asymmetric growth the eye, relaxing cuts were made to allow it to lie flat, and it was mounted 1. Callionymidae (dragonets) with the inner limiting membrane up, in 50% phosphate buffer, 50% a. Unidentified (3) glycerol, and coverslipped. The intersection of the embryonic fissure 2. Cirrhitidae (hawkfish) with the margin was taken as the ventral pole, and all whole-mounts a. Cirrhitichthys falco (dwarf hawkfish) (1) are shown with the ventral pole below, the dorsal pole up, and the 3. Iabridae (wrasses) nasotemporal axis horizontal. Some eyes were embedded in glycomethacrylate, sectioned, and stained a. Mucropharygodon negrosensis (black wrasse) (1) 4. Monacanthidae (leatherjackets) with toluidine blue. a. Unidentified (8) Slides were viewed and photographed on a Zeiss Universal compound 5. Pinguipedidae (sand perch) microscope with rhodamine-cube epiillumination. Table 1 lists the 15 teleost families, and where possible the genera a. Parupercis cylindricu (sharpnose sand perch) (4) b. Purupercis nebulosu (barred sand perch) (10) and species, included in this study.
Recommended publications
  • Alcolapia Grahami ERSS
    Lake Magadi Tilapia (Alcolapia grahami) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, March 2015 Revised, August 2017, October 2017 Web Version, 8/21/2018 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Bayona and Akinyi (2006): “The natural range of this species is restricted to a single location: Lake Magadi [Kenya].” Status in the United States No records of Alcolapia grahami in the wild or in trade in the United States were found. The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission has listed the tilapia Alcolapia grahami as a prohibited species. Prohibited nonnative species (FFWCC 2018), “are considered to be dangerous to the ecology and/or the health and welfare of the people of Florida. These species are not allowed to be personally possessed or used for commercial activities.” Means of Introductions in the United States No records of Alcolapia grahami in the United States were found. 1 Remarks From Bayona and Akinyi (2006): “Vulnerable D2 ver 3.1” Various sources use Alcolapia grahami (Eschmeyer et al. 2017) or Oreochromis grahami (ITIS 2017) as the accepted name for this species. Information searches were conducted under both names to ensure completeness of the data gathered. 2 Biology and Ecology Taxonomic Hierarchy and Taxonomic Standing According to Eschmeyer et al. (2017), Alcolapia grahami (Boulenger 1912) is the current valid name for this species. It was originally described as Tilapia grahami; it has also been known as Oreoghromis grahami, and as a synonym, but valid subspecies, of
    [Show full text]
  • Humboldt Bay Fishes
    Humboldt Bay Fishes ><((((º>`·._ .·´¯`·. _ .·´¯`·. ><((((º> ·´¯`·._.·´¯`·.. ><((((º>`·._ .·´¯`·. _ .·´¯`·. ><((((º> Acknowledgements The Humboldt Bay Harbor District would like to offer our sincere thanks and appreciation to the authors and photographers who have allowed us to use their work in this report. Photography and Illustrations We would like to thank the photographers and illustrators who have so graciously donated the use of their images for this publication. Andrey Dolgor Dan Gotshall Polar Research Institute of Marine Sea Challengers, Inc. Fisheries And Oceanography [email protected] [email protected] Michael Lanboeuf Milton Love [email protected] Marine Science Institute [email protected] Stephen Metherell Jacques Moreau [email protected] [email protected] Bernd Ueberschaer Clinton Bauder [email protected] [email protected] Fish descriptions contained in this report are from: Froese, R. and Pauly, D. Editors. 2003 FishBase. Worldwide Web electronic publication. http://www.fishbase.org/ 13 August 2003 Photographer Fish Photographer Bauder, Clinton wolf-eel Gotshall, Daniel W scalyhead sculpin Bauder, Clinton blackeye goby Gotshall, Daniel W speckled sanddab Bauder, Clinton spotted cusk-eel Gotshall, Daniel W. bocaccio Bauder, Clinton tube-snout Gotshall, Daniel W. brown rockfish Gotshall, Daniel W. yellowtail rockfish Flescher, Don american shad Gotshall, Daniel W. dover sole Flescher, Don stripped bass Gotshall, Daniel W. pacific sanddab Gotshall, Daniel W. kelp greenling Garcia-Franco, Mauricio louvar
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of Arctic Marine Fishes: Taxonomy and Zoogeography
    Mar Biodiv DOI 10.1007/s12526-010-0070-z ARCTIC OCEAN DIVERSITY SYNTHESIS Biodiversity of arctic marine fishes: taxonomy and zoogeography Catherine W. Mecklenburg & Peter Rask Møller & Dirk Steinke Received: 3 June 2010 /Revised: 23 September 2010 /Accepted: 1 November 2010 # Senckenberg, Gesellschaft für Naturforschung and Springer 2010 Abstract Taxonomic and distributional information on each Six families in Cottoidei with 72 species and five in fish species found in arctic marine waters is reviewed, and a Zoarcoidei with 55 species account for more than half list of families and species with commentary on distributional (52.5%) the species. This study produced CO1 sequences for records is presented. The list incorporates results from 106 of the 242 species. Sequence variability in the barcode examination of museum collections of arctic marine fishes region permits discrimination of all species. The average dating back to the 1830s. It also incorporates results from sequence variation within species was 0.3% (range 0–3.5%), DNA barcoding, used to complement morphological charac- while the average genetic distance between congeners was ters in evaluating problematic taxa and to assist in identifica- 4.7% (range 3.7–13.3%). The CO1 sequences support tion of specimens collected in recent expeditions. Barcoding taxonomic separation of some species, such as Osmerus results are depicted in a neighbor-joining tree of 880 CO1 dentex and O. mordax and Liparis bathyarcticus and L. (cytochrome c oxidase 1 gene) sequences distributed among gibbus; and synonymy of others, like Myoxocephalus 165 species from the arctic region and adjacent waters, and verrucosus in M. scorpius and Gymnelus knipowitschi in discussed in the family reviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Fishes of Sydney Harbour 2019
    Table of Fishes of Sydney Harbour 2019 Family Family/Com Species Species Common Notes mon Name Name Acanthuridae Surgeonfishe Acanthurus Eyestripe close s dussumieri Surgeonfish to southern li mit Acanthuridae Acanthurus Orangebloch close to olivaceus Surgeonfish southern limit Acanthuridae Acanthurus Convict close to triostegus Surgeonfish southern limit Acanthuridae Acanthurus Yellowmask xanthopterus Surgeonfish Acanthuridae Paracanthurus Blue Tang not included hepatus in species count Acanthuridae Prionurus Spotted Sawtail maculatus Acanthuridae Prionurus Australian Sawtail microlepidotus Ambassidae Glassfishes Ambassis Port Jackson jacksoniensis glassfish Ambassidae Ambassis marianus Estuary Glassfish Anguillidae Freshwater Anguilla australis Shortfin Eel Eels Anguillidae Anguilla reinhardtii Longfinned Eel Antennariidae Anglerfishes Antennarius Freckled Anglerfish southern limit coccineus Antennariidae Antennarius Giant Anglerfish close to commerson southen limit Antennariidae Antennarius Shaggy Anglerfish southern limit hispidus Antennariidae Antennarius pictus Painted Anglerfish Antennariidae Antennarius striatus Striate Anglerfish Table of Fishes of Sydney Harbour 2019 Antennariidae Histrio histrio Sargassum close to Anglerfish southen limit Antennariidae Porophryne Red-fingered erythrodactylus Anglerfish Aploactinidae Velvetfishes Aploactisoma Southern Velvetfish milesii Aploactinidae Cocotropus Patchwork microps Velvetfish Aploactinidae Paraploactis Bearded Velvetfish trachyderma Aplodactylidae Seacarps Aplodactylus Rock Cale
    [Show full text]
  • Observation on the Urinogenital Papilla and Sexual Dimorphism in Some Indian Gobiids (Gobiidae: Teleostei)
    Observation on the urinogenital papilla and sexual dimorphism in some Indian gobiids (Gobiidae: Teleostei) Item Type article Authors Har, S.P. Download date 05/10/2021 03:51:48 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/32378 Journal of the Indian Fisheries Association 7 27,2000, 7-17 OBSERVATION ON THE URINOGENITAL PAPILLA AND SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN SOME INDIAN GOBIIDS (GOBIIDAE: TELEOSTEI) SAKTI HAR Department of Zoology, Ranwnanda College, Bishnupur, Bankura-722122. W. Bengal, India. ABSTRACT A thorough comparative study on the urinogenital papilla and sexual dimorphism has been made for the first time in both the sexes of twelve Indian gobiids- Glassogobius giuris (Han1ilton); Acentrogobius cyanomos (Bleeker); Eleotriodes muralis (Valenciennes); Parapocryptes serperaster (Richardson); Apocryptes bato (Hamilton); Scartclaos viridis (Hamilton); Boleophthalmus boddarti (Pallas), Periophthalmus schlosseri (Pallas); P. koelreuteri (Pallas); Taenioides anguillaris (Linnaeus); T. buchanani (Day); Odontamblyopus rubicundus (Hamilton). The urinogenital papilla, originating as a free muscular organ from the ventral surface of the body-wall and shortly behind anus, is present in both the sexes. It is an important organ of primary sex recognition in all species. In case of male the papilla is conical, broad at the base and in female it is either flattened, distally truncated or bluntly rounded. The presence of permanent colour mark over the specific region of the body surface is another secondary sexual character in a few species. Besides, colouration may also be a nuptial secondary sex character developed in some during peak breeding season. The enlargement and colouration of the organ is subject to seasonal variations parallel to the seasonal gonadal cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals
    Jelle Atema Richard R. Fay Arthur N. Popper William N. Tavolga Editors Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals Springer-Verlag New York Berlin Heidelberg London Paris Tokyo JELLE ATEMA, Boston University Marine Program, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA Richard R. Fay, Parmly Hearing Institute, Loyola University, Chicago, Illinois 60626, USA ARTHUR N. POPPER, Department of Zoology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA WILLIAM N. TAVOLGA, Mote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota, Florida 33577, USA The cover Illustration is a reproduction of Figure 13.3, p. 343 of this volume Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Sensory biology of aquatic animals. Papers based on presentations given at an International Conference on the Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals held, June 24-28, 1985, at the Mote Marine Laboratory in Sarasota, Fla. Bibliography: p. Includes indexes. 1. Aquatic animals—Physiology—Congresses. 2. Senses and Sensation—Congresses. I. Atema, Jelle. II. International Conference on the Sensory Biology - . of Aquatic Animals (1985 : Sarasota, Fla.) QL120.S46 1987 591.92 87-9632 © 1988 by Springer-Verlag New York Inc. x —• All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer-Verlag, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York 10010, U.S.A.), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of Information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, Computer Software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Digenea: Opecoelidae
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Scott aG rdner Publications & Papers Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of 2017 Pseudopecoelus mccauleyi n. sp. and Podocotyle sp. (Digenea: Opecoelidae) from the Deep Waters off Oregon and British Columbia with an Updated Key to the Species of Pseudopecoelus von Wicklen, 1946 and Checklist of Parasites from Lycodes cortezianus (Perciformes: Zoarcidae) Charles K. Blend Corpus Christi, Texas, [email protected] Norman O. Dronen Texas A & M University, [email protected] Gábor R. Rácz University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Scott yL ell Gardner FUonilvloerwsit ythi of sN aendbras akdda - Litiionncolaln, slwg@unlorks a.etdu: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/slg Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, Biodiversity Commons, Biology Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Marine Biology Commons, and the Parasitology Commons Blend, Charles K.; Dronen, Norman O.; Rácz, Gábor R.; and Gardner, Scott yL ell, "Pseudopecoelus mccauleyi n. sp. and Podocotyle sp. (Digenea: Opecoelidae) from the Deep Waters off Oregon and British Columbia with an Updated Key to the Species of Pseudopecoelus von Wicklen, 1946 and Checklist of Parasites from Lycodes cortezianus (Perciformes: Zoarcidae)" (2017). Scott aG rdner Publications & Papers. 3. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/slg/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scott aG rdner Publications & Papers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Blend, Dronen, Racz, & Gardner in Acta Parasitologica (2017) 62(2). Copyright 2017, W. Stefański Institute of Parasitology.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Coastal Marine Fishes of California
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME FISH BULLETIN 157 GUIDE TO THE COASTAL MARINE FISHES OF CALIFORNIA by DANIEL J. MILLER and ROBERT N. LEA Marine Resources Region 1972 ABSTRACT This is a comprehensive identification guide encompassing all shallow marine fishes within California waters. Geographic range limits, maximum size, depth range, a brief color description, and some meristic counts including, if available: fin ray counts, lateral line pores, lateral line scales, gill rakers, and vertebrae are given. Body proportions and shapes are used in the keys and a state- ment concerning the rarity or commonness in California is given for each species. In all, 554 species are described. Three of these have not been re- corded or confirmed as occurring in California waters but are included since they are apt to appear. The remainder have been recorded as occurring in an area between the Mexican and Oregon borders and offshore to at least 50 miles. Five of California species as yet have not been named or described, and ichthyologists studying these new forms have given information on identification to enable inclusion here. A dichotomous key to 144 families includes an outline figure of a repre- sentative for all but two families. Keys are presented for all larger families, and diagnostic features are pointed out on most of the figures. Illustrations are presented for all but eight species. Of the 554 species, 439 are found primarily in depths less than 400 ft., 48 are meso- or bathypelagic species, and 67 are deepwater bottom dwelling forms rarely taken in less than 400 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Fish Taxonomic Key 2017 Edition
    Minnesota Fish Taxonomic Key 2017 Edition Pictures from – NANFA (2017) Warren Lamb Aquatic Biology Program Bemidji State University Bemidji, MN 56601 Introduction Minnesota’s landscape is maze of lakes and river that are home to a recorded total of 163 species of fish. This document is a complete and current dichotomous taxonomic key of the Minnesota fishes. This key was based on the 1972 “Northern Fishes” key (Eddy 1972), and updated based on Dr. Jay Hatch’s article “Minnesota Fishes: Just How Many Are There?” (Hatch 2016). Any new species or family additions were also referenced to the 7th edition of the American Fisheries society “Names of North American Fishes” (Page et al. 2013) to assess whether a fish species is currently recognized by the scientific community. Identifying characteristics for new additions were compared to those found in Page and Burr (2011). In total five species and one family have been added to the taxonomic key, while three have been removed since the last publication. Species pictures within the keys have been provide from either Bemidji State University Ichthyology Students or North American Native Fish Association (NANFA). My hope is that this document will offer an accurate and simple key so anyone can identify the fish they may encounter in Minnesota. Warren Lamb – 2017 Pictures from – NANFA (2017) References Eddy, S. and J. C. Underhill. 1974. Northern Fishes. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. 414 pp. Hatch, J. 2015. Minnesota fishes: just how many are there anyway? American Currents 40:10-21. Page, L. M. and B. M. Burr. 2011. Peterson Field Guide to Freshwater Fishes of North America North of Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • A Check-List of the Fishes of the Great Lakes and Tributary Waters, with Nomenclatorial Notes and Analytical Keys
    UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY Miscellaneous Publications No. 15 A Check-List of the Fishes of the Great Lakes and Tributary Waters, with Nomenclatorial Notes and Analytical Keys BY CARL L. HUBBS ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN ,PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY July 7, 1926 UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY Miscellaneous Publications No. 15 A Check-List of the Fishes of the Great Lakes and Tributary Waters, with Nomenclatorial Notes and Analytical Keys BY CARL 1,. HUBBS ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN PUBLISI-IED BY TI-IE UNIVERSITY July 7, 1926 The publications of the RXuseuin of Zoology, University of INichigan, consist of two serics-the Occasional Papers and the Miscellaneous Publi- cations. Both series were founded by Dr. Bryant JTTall~e~,Mr. Bradshaw I-I. Swalcs and Dr. W. W. Newcomb. The Occasional Papers, publication of which was begun in 1913, scrve as a medium for the publicatioil of brief original papers based principally upon the collrctions i11 the Museum. The papers arc issued separately to libraries and specialists, and when a sufficient number of pages have been printed to malie a volume, a titlc page, index, and table of contcnts arc sup- plied to libraries and individuals on the mailing list lor the entire scries. The Aliscellaneous Publications include papers on ficld and museum technique, monographic studies and other papers not within the scope of the Occasional Papers. The papers arc published separately, and, as it is not intended that they shall be grouped into volumes, each nuillher has a title page and, when izccessary, a table of contents. ALEXANDERG. RUTHVEN, Director of the Museum of Zoology, TJniversity of Michigan.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Dissection Guide
    Fish dissection guide Internal Anatomy: 1. Incision at anus . Begin by inserting a fine scalpel blade 4. Cut along isthmus . Use scissors to cut anteriorly through into the anus (also called the vent) of the fish. The anus is located the bones attached to the pelvic fins. Cut forward along the just anterior to (in front of) the anal fin, on the ventral (lower) side narrow, fleshy space beneath the head and between the gill of the fish in most fishes. covers. The gill covers (also known as operculae) are flaps which lie along both sides of the head and protect the underlying gills. 2. Cutting anteriorly. The incision is then extended anteriorly along the fish's belly towards the head. 5. Body cavity. Pull apart the two walls of the body cavity and expose the internal organs (see next image for names). The neat incision now runs from the anus forward between the two pelvic fins and along the isthmus. 3. Cut between pelvic fins . The incision passes anteriorly between the pelvic (ventral) fins. Depending on the type of fish, these paired fins are used to stabilise the fish when swimming and also for braking. The pelvic fins are supported by the bones of the . Some of the ventrally located internal pelvic girdle which are anchored in the belly muscles. 6. Internal organs organs: 1 heart, 2 Liver, 3 Pyloric caecae, 4 adipose (fatty) tissue 7. Pull aside gut. Here the adipose tissue (1) and gut (2) are 10. Swim bladder exposed. The other organs have been pulled aside to expose the swim bladder (3), gonads (4) and removed to expose the swim bladder at the top of the body kidneys (5).
    [Show full text]
  • Wetlands of Wallis and Futuna 2017
    WETLANDS OF WALLIS AND FUTUNA 2017 WETLANDS OF WALLIS AND FUTUNA 2017 Michael J. B. Dyer Akiko Hamada-Ano Mathilde Kraft Warren Lee Long Prepared with the financial assistance of Fonds Pacifique Copyright: The publishers and sponsors have waived copyright. ISBN: 978–982–04–0747–3 (print) 978–982–04–0748–0 (e-copy) CIP: 1. Wetlands – Directory – Wallis and Futuna. 2. Wetlands – Baseline inventories – Wallis and Futuna. I. Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP). II. Title 333.918 961 6 Cover illustration: Lake Lalolalo © Vainuupo Jungblut Maps prepared by: Michael J.B. Dyer, Akiko Hamada-Ano and Ryan Wright. Typeset by: The Little Design Company, Wellington, New Zealand Citation: Dyer, M.J.B., Hamada-Ano, A., Kraft, M. and Lee Long, W.J. Wetlands of Wallis and Futuna – 2017. Apia, Samoa: SPREP, 2018. 1993 Publication: Scott DA, Asian Wetland Bureau, International Waterfowl and Wetlands Research Bureau. 1993. A directory of wetlands in Oceania. Slimbridge, U.K.: Kuala Lumpur: International Waterfowl and Wetlands Research Bureau; Asian Wetland Bureau. Available from: Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP), P.O. Box 240, Apia, Samoa Ph: +685 21929 Fax: +685 20231 Email: [email protected] www.sprep.org DISCLAIMER The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of SPREP, Service de l’Environnement or contributory organisations. The designations employed and the presentation of material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of SPREP, Service de l’Environnement or contributory organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory or city or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]