DOCSLIB.ORG

General Enquiries on This Form Should Be Made

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
General Enquiries on This Form Should Be Made General Enquiries on the form should be made to: Defra, Procurements and Commercial Function (Evidence Procurement Team) E-mail: [email protected] Evidence Project Final Report Note In line with the Freedom of Information Project identification Act 2000, Defra aims to place the results of its completed research projects in the public domain wherever possible. 1. Defra Project code FFG1207 The Evidence Project Final Report is designed to capture the information on 2. Project title the results and outputs of Defra-funded Adding tree health value to UK monitoring networks research in a format that is easily publishable through the Defra website An Evidence Project Final Report must be completed for all projects. 3. Contractor Plymouth University This form is in Word format and the organisation(s) boxes may be expanded, as appropriate. ACCESS TO INFORMATION The information collected on this form will be stored electronically and may be sent 54. Total Defra project costs £29878 to any part of Defra, or to individual researchers or organisations outside (agreed fixed price) Defra for the purposes of reviewing the project. Defra may also disclose the 5. Project: start date ................ 1 December 2012 information to any outside organisation acting as an agent authorised by Defra to 31 March 2013 process final research reports on its end date ................. behalf. Defra intends to publish this form on its website, unless there are strong reasons not to, which fully comply with exemptions under the Environmental Information Regulations or the Freedom of Information Act 2000. Defra may be required to release information, including personal data and commercial information, on request under the Environmental Information Regulations or the Freedom of Information Act 2000. However, Defra will not permit any unwarranted breach of confidentiality or act in contravention of its obligations under the Data Protection Act 1998. Defra or its appointed agents may use the name, address or other details on your form to contact you in connection with occasional customer research aimed at improving the processes through which Defra works with its contractors. EVID4 Evidence Project Final Report (Rev. 06/11) Page 1 of 37 6. It is Defra‟s intention to publish this form. Please confirm your agreement to do so. ..................................................................................... YES X NO (a) When preparing Evidence Project Final Reports contractors should bear in mind that Defra intends that they be made public. They should be written in a clear and concise manner and represent a full account of the research project which someone not closely associated with the project can follow. Defra recognises that in a small minority of cases there may be information, such as intellectual property or commercially confidential data, used in or generated by the research project, which should not be disclosed. In these cases, such information should be detailed in a separate annex (not to be published) so that the Evidence Project Final Report can be placed in the public domain. Where it is impossible to complete the Final Report without including references to any sensitive or confidential data, the information should be included and section (b) completed. NB: only in exceptional circumstances will Defra expect contractors to give a "No" answer. In all cases, reasons for withholding information must be fully in line with exemptions under the Environmental Information Regulations or the Freedom of Information Act 2000. (b) If you have answered NO, please explain why the Final report should not be released into public domain Executive Summary 7. The executive summary must not exceed 2 sides in total of A4 and should be understandable to the intelligent non-scientist. It should cover the main objectives, methods and findings of the research, together with any other significant events and options for new work. Project Rationale The frequency with which invasive tree pests have become established in the UK has increased in recent years. One interpretation of this observation is that, against a background of changes to global trade patterns, current pest surveillance systems are no longer sufficient to deliver biosecurity by themselves. This project considered the potential for introducing an additional level of surveillance, using existing monitoring networks. Project Objectives 1. review existing insect monitoring and sampling schemes (professional and amateur) and evaluate their potential to contribute to enhanced plant health surveillance; 2. evaluate a wide range of trapping and sampling methods (e.g. canopy entomology) targeted at the major insect orders and pests included in the EPPO A1 and A2 lists,in particular; 3. assess the potential for using new technologies (e.g. next generation sequencing) to resolve detection and identification issues anticipated to arise when adapting existing monitoring and sampling methods; 4. identify existing and potential mathematical modelling approaches that can support the cost-effective design of surveillance systems (similar to those used for the Defra Phytophthora programme); 5. consider the process of data recording and timely delivery of information about potential threats Project Activities A desk study was undertaken to identify and evaluate existing insect and other monitoring schemes. A total of 287 such networks were identified. In addition, a meeting was held with Tim Elliot of the Meteorological Office to consider the potential of utilising EVID4 Evidence Project Final Report (Rev. 06/11) Page 2 of 37 the well-established network of volunteers contributing to the Climate Network. The EPPO A1 and A2 pest lists were critically examined and evaluated for their potential risk to UK trees. Additional species of concern to the Forestry Commission were also incorporated to provide a working „risk register‟ for this project. A total of 73 species spanning five insect orders were identified as potential threats. Of these, 57 had records of some form of attractant having been identified and specific traps were reported for 39 species. The species on the risk register were used to evaluate the range of potential insect trap types. We explored the potential for next generation sequencing to provide timely information about species presence and spread, and the possibilities for mathematical modelling to be used in deciding how many and where traps should be located, through meetings with experts. A critical constraint in any monitoring system is the delivery of timely information and problems relating to location and identification of target organisms that appear at low frequency in large multi-species trap catches often represents a significant time-limiting step. A meeting was held with the sequencing and bioinformatics groups at The Genomic Analysis Centre (TGAC) in Norwich to evaluate the potential of next generation sequencing and metagenomics for resolving this issue. The requirements for mathematical modelling to support the design of surveillance systems were discussed in meetings with the Gilligan laboratory (Cambridge University) and the van den Bosche group at Rothamsted. A workshop was held on 20 March 2013 to consider and test ideas emerging from the project and confirm identified research gaps. Project Conclusions 1. No suitable network exists for straightforward adaptation to provide an additional level of biosecurity surveillance. 2. Most insect trapping methods are tailored to specific taxa. There is some evidence that combining characteristics of different trap types increases the diversity of captured insects but only suction traps are known to be taxonomically neutral with respect to the species that they catch. 3. Next generation technologies are capable of determining (rapidly and cost- effectively) if a known species is present within a mixed species sample. 4. Sample preparation rather than processing is the greater constraint for DNA-based methods; a turnaround time of one week from receipt is feasible. 5. Epidemiological models developed to forecast the spread of pests and diseases can be adapted to support additional biosecurity surveillance by forecasting insect dispersal, and hence be used to examine permutations of trapping networks. 6. The concept of a new national monitoring network, complimenting existing Plant Health procedures by providing timely information about the presence or absence of targeted pest species, is scientifically and technically viable. Research Gaps In order to test the feasibility of a new national pest monitoring network, the following research requirements have been identified: 1. Development of a simple, robust and functional multi-taxa insect trap. EVID4 Evidence Project Final Report (Rev. 06/11) Page 3 of 37 2. Testing and demonstration that specific sequences can be detected from whole trap catch DNA extraction. 3. Determination of characteristics associated with volunteers operating long-term, sustainable scientific networks. 4. Mathematical models to optimise the geographic location of traps. 5. Optimisation of species-specific trapping methods for all targets on a national risk register. 6. Evaluation of multi-species lure mixtures to potentiate traps for risk register species. Project Report to Defra Project consortium The consortium brought together expertise in plant health (Walters), national insect surveillance (Harrington), and insect spatial ecology/dispersal and the functioning of trapping systems (Blackshaw).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • And Pityogenes Knechteli (Swaine) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in Lodgepole Pine
    " "SEMIOCHEMICAL-BASED COMMUNICATION IN INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTIONS BETWEEN IPS PINI (SAY) AND PITYOGENES KNECHTELI (SWAINE) (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE) IN LODGEPOLE PINE . THERESE M. POLAND and JOHN H. BORDEN Centre forPest Management,Department of Biological Sciences, SimonFraser University, Bumaby, l BritishColumbia,Canada V5A 1S6 ,_._, _ ::._.., _.,.... Abstract The Canadian Entomologist 126:269-276 (1994) .,:.... _ , . , a The pine engraver, Ips pini Say, and Pityogenes knechteli Swaine often co-exist in " , lodgepole pine, Pinus contorta var. latifolia Engelmann. We tested the hypotheses that ,.. " P. knechteli produces an attractive pheromone and that the attraction of P. knechteli and _%_'.. • I. pini to conspecifics is inhibited by the presence of the other species. Pityogenes ._:,: knechteli males and females were attracted to bolts infested with conspecific males and •. , , to bolts infested with I. pini males; however, there was no significant cross-attraction of ...... •: _ - I. pini males or females to bolts infested with P. knechteli males. Attraction ofP. knechteli " :;• _ ..... ,and I. pini males and females to bolts infested with conspecific males was not inhibited • ,. ._ in the presence of bolts infested with males of the other bark beetle species. Pityogenes .... knechteli has no potential for compe.titive displacement of I. pini but may enhance the adverse effectof I. pini on.the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins. ; Poland, T.M., et J.H. Borden. 1994. Communication s6mio-chimique lors des interactions _e.. ., intersp6cifiquesentreIpspini (Say)et Pityogenesknechteli (Swaine) (Coleoptera:Scolytidae) " " chez le Pin de Murray.The Canadian Entomologist 126:269-276 ? R_sum_ • _ ' Les scolytes Ips pini Say et Pityogenes knechteli Swaine cohabitent souvent dans des ' '_7:.':_ ......:'_:_::'_ Pins de Murray Pinus contorta var.
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonality and Lure Preference of Bark Beetles (Curculionidae: Scolytinae) and Associates in a Northern Arizona Ponderosa Pine Forest
    COMMUNITY AND ECOSYSTEM ECOLOGY Seasonality and Lure Preference of Bark Beetles (Curculionidae: Scolytinae) and Associates in a Northern Arizona Ponderosa Pine Forest 1,2 1 3 1 M. L. GAYLORD, T. E. KOLB, K. F. WALLIN, AND M. R. WAGNER Environ. Entomol. 35(1): 37Ð47 (2006) ABSTRACT Ponderosa pine forests in northern Arizona have historically experienced limited bark beetle-caused tree mortality, and little is known about the bark beetle community in these forests. Our objectives were to describe the ßight seasonality and lure preference of bark beetles and their associates in these forests. We monitored bark beetle populations for 24 consecutive months in 2002 and 2003 using Lindgren funnel traps with Þve different pheromone lures. In both years, the majority of bark beetles were trapped between May and October, and the peak captures of coleopteran predator species, Enoclerus (F.) (Cleridae) and Temnochila chlorodia (Mannerheim), occurred between June and August. Trap catches of Elacatis (Coleoptera: Othniidae, now Salpingidae), a suspected predator, peaked early in the spring. For wood borers, trap catches of the Buprestidae family peaked in late May/early June, and catches of the Cerambycidae family peaked in July/August. The lure targeted for Dendroctonus brevicomis LeConte attracted the largest percentage of all Dendroc- tonus beetles except for D. valens LeConte, which was attracted in highest percentage to the lure targeted for D. valens. The lure targeted for Ips pini attracted the highest percentage of beetles for all three Ips species [I.pini (Say), I. latidens (LeConte), and I. lecontei Swaine] and the two predators, Enoclerus and T. chlorodia.
    [Show full text]
  • Alien Invasive Species and International Trade
    Forest Research Institute Alien Invasive Species and International Trade Edited by Hugh Evans and Tomasz Oszako Warsaw 2007 Reviewers: Steve Woodward (University of Aberdeen, School of Biological Sciences, Scotland, UK) François Lefort (University of Applied Science in Lullier, Switzerland) © Copyright by Forest Research Institute, Warsaw 2007 ISBN 978-83-87647-64-3 Description of photographs on the covers: Alder decline in Poland – T. Oszako, Forest Research Institute, Poland ALB Brighton – Forest Research, UK; Anoplophora exit hole (example of wood packaging pathway) – R. Burgess, Forestry Commission, UK Cameraria adult Brussels – P. Roose, Belgium; Cameraria damage medium view – Forest Research, UK; other photographs description inside articles – see Belbahri et al. Language Editor: James Richards Layout: Gra¿yna Szujecka Print: Sowa–Print on Demand www.sowadruk.pl, phone: +48 022 431 81 40 Instytut Badawczy Leœnictwa 05-090 Raszyn, ul. Braci Leœnej 3, phone [+48 22] 715 06 16 e-mail: [email protected] CONTENTS Introduction .......................................6 Part I – EXTENDED ABSTRACTS Thomas Jung, Marla Downing, Markus Blaschke, Thomas Vernon Phytophthora root and collar rot of alders caused by the invasive Phytophthora alni: actual distribution, pathways, and modeled potential distribution in Bavaria ......................10 Tomasz Oszako, Leszek B. Orlikowski, Aleksandra Trzewik, Teresa Orlikowska Studies on the occurrence of Phytophthora ramorum in nurseries, forest stands and garden centers ..........................19 Lassaad Belbahri, Eduardo Moralejo, Gautier Calmin, François Lefort, Jose A. Garcia, Enrique Descals Reports of Phytophthora hedraiandra on Viburnum tinus and Rhododendron catawbiense in Spain ..................26 Leszek B. Orlikowski, Tomasz Oszako The influence of nursery-cultivated plants, as well as cereals, legumes and crucifers, on selected species of Phytophthopra ............30 Lassaad Belbahri, Gautier Calmin, Tomasz Oszako, Eduardo Moralejo, Jose A.
    [Show full text]
  • Checkered Beetle Thanasimus Dubius (Fabricius)
    adult larva The Bugwood Network and USDA Forest Service adult larva The Bugwood Network and USDA Forest Service checkered beetle Thanasimus dubius (Fabricius) Checkered beetles in the family Cleridae are among the most important insect predators attacking forest insect pests. Adults of most species are active, antlike, brightly colored, hairy beetles that prey on adult beetles. Larvae live in the galleries and tunnels of bark beetles and woodborers and destroy the immature stages of these insects. Thanasimus dubius is one of the most important predators of destructive bark beetles in the Eastern United States. The adult is 7 to 10 mm long with the head, thorax, and base of the wing covers being a dull red. The antennae and legs are red to black, and the wing covers are mostly black with crossbands of whitish hairs. The larva is elongate, spindle-shaped, and purplish with several dark brown hardened areas on the body. Winter is spent in the larval, pupal, or adult stages. In early spring, the adults emerge and fly to bark beetle-infested trees or logs and feed on the adult prey as they emerge from hibernation. Eggs are deposited in entrances to bark beetle galleries. Young checkered beetle larvae feed on bark beetle eggs; older ones feed on host larvae, pupae, and adults. Pupation occurs in cells in the outer bark. checkered beetle Thanasimus dubius (Fabricius) Checkered beetles in the family Cleridae are among the most important insect predators attacking forest insect pests. Adults of most species are active, antlike, brightly colored, hairy beetles that prey on adult beetles.
    [Show full text]
  • Dendroctonus Beetles and Old-Growth Forests in the Rockies
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Quinney Natural Resources Research Library, The Bark Beetles, Fuels, and Fire Bibliography S.J. and Jessie E. 1992 Dendroctonus Beetles and Old-Growth Forests in the Rockies J M. Schmid G D. Amman Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/barkbeetles Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Entomology Commons, Forest Biology Commons, Forest Management Commons, and the Wood Science and Pulp, Paper Technology Commons Recommended Citation Schmid, J. and Amman, G. (1992). Dendroctonus beetles and old-growth forests in the Rockies. In: MR Kaufmann, WH Moir and WH Bassett (tech.eds) Old-growth Forest in the Southwest and Rock Mountain Regions, Proceedings of a Workshop (pp. 51-59). USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RM-GTR-213. This Contribution to Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Quinney Natural Resources Research Library, S.J. and Jessie E. at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Bark Beetles, Fuels, and Fire Bibliography by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dendroctonus Beetles and Old-Growth Forests in the Rockies1 J. M. Schmid and G. D. Amman2 Abstract.-Dendroctonus beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) are a major mortality agent in old growth pine, spruce-fir, and Douglas-fir forests of the Rocky Mountains. The frequency of recurring bark beetle epidemics depends on the size of the area being considered, how extensively the stand(s) was decimated by a previous epidemic(s), and how fast the stand(s) grows into the hazardous condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Psw 2020 Fettig006 Audley.Pdf
    Forest Ecology and Management 475 (2020) 118403 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Forest Ecology and Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco Impacts of mountain pine beetle outbreaks on lodgepole pine forests in the T Intermountain West, U.S., 2004–2019 ⁎ Jackson P. Audleya, Christopher J. Fettiga, , A. Steven Munsonb, Justin B. Runyonc, Leif A. Mortensond, Brytten E. Steede, Kenneth E. Gibsone, Carl L. Jørgensenf, Stephen R. McKelveya, Joel D. McMilling, Jose F. Negrónh a Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 1731 Research Park Drive, Davis, CA95618,USA b Forest Health Protection, USDA Forest Service, 4746 South 1900 East, Ogden, UT 84403, USA c Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 1648 South 7th Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA d Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 2480 Carson Road, Placerville, CA 95667,USA e Forest Health Protection, USDA Forest Service, 26 Fort Missoula, Missoula, MT 59804, USA f Forest Health Protection, USDA Forest Service, 1249 South Vinnell Way, Suite 200, Boise, ID 83709, USA g Forest Health Protection, USDA Forest Service, 2500 South Pine Knoll Drive, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA h Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 240 West Prospect Road, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), is the most important forest Bark beetles insect in western North America. We determined causes and rates of tree mortality and changes in forest Climate change structure and composition associated with D. ponderosae outbreaks in the Intermountain West, U.S. during Dendroctonus ponderosae 2004–2019 based on a network of 125 0.081-ha circular plots installed in Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Utah and Disturbance Wyoming.
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTHERN PINE BEETLE (Dendroctonus Frontalis Zimmermann)
    SOUTHERN PINE BEETLE (Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmermann): SEMIOCHEMICAL ECOLOGY, RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN OUTBREAK POPULATIONS AND LIGHTNING STRIKE, AND ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS OF SUPPRESSION AND CONTROL TECHNIQUES. by JENNY C. STAEBEN (Under the Direction of Kamal J. K. Gandhi) ABSTRACT The economically damaging southern pine beetle (Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmermann) is one of the most destructive insect pests in southeastern United States. SPB populations are monitored using a racemic kairomone, α-pinene, and pheromone, frontalin to capture SPB and predator, Thanasimus dubius (Fabricius). I assessed whether SPB and T. dubius differentiate between enantiomers of α-pinene. Results indicated the response of female and male SPB to α-pinene enantiomers did not significantly differ, although males were somewhat more responsive to (+)-α-pinene. Captures of T. dubius increased with volumes of α-pinene, and T. dubius did not differentiate between enantiomers. Typically SPB infest pines other southern pine bark beetle guild (SPBBG) members (which include Dendroctonus terebrans (Olivier) and Ips beetle species). Colonizing Ips species release either ipsdienol and/or ipsenol. I assessed the inter- and intraspecies attraction among SPBBG and their predators. Results indicate SPB and T. dubius are not attracted to Ips attractants and vice versa. BTB and Ips calligraphus (Germar) were attracted to Ips attractants. SPBBG predators (other than Pycnomerus sulcicollis LeConte) did not differentiate between SPB and Ips attractants. Using linear regression, I assessed the relationship between lightning strike and SPB infestations. Results indicated a relationship between SPB infestations developing within 100-250 m of a negatively-charged lightning strike with a magnitude of > 150 kilo amps. There was no relationship between the basal area pine stands and the likelihood of lightning strike.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Infestation of Fire- Injured'trees in the Greater Yellowstone Area
    /11... United States Department of Agriculture Insect Infestation of Fire­ Forest Service Injured'Trees in the • Intermountain Research Station Research Note Greater Yellowstone Area INT-398 September 1991 Gene D. Amman1 Kevin c. Ryan2 ABSTRACT Survival of conifers following fire depends on the type and degree of injuries sustained, initial tree Permanent plots were established in the Greater vigor, and the postfire environment, including Yellowstone Area (GYA,) following the 1988 fires to weather and insect and disease population dynam­ determine response of bark beetles to fire-injured ics (Ryan 1982, 1990). As fire injuries increase, the conifers. Within 2 years (1989 and 1990), 67 percent probability of tree death increases. Numerous of the Douglas-(z.r had been infested by bark beetles authors (compare Peterson 1985; Peterson and (primarily the Douglas-fir beetle) and wood borers; Arbaugh 1986, 1989; Ryan 1990; Ryan and others 44 percent of the lodgepole pine were infested (prima­ 1988) have identified the proportion of crown killed rily by the pine engraver); 82 percent of the Engel­ as the key injury contributing to death of most mann spruce were infested (mostly by spruce beetle); trees, but injuries to bole cambium or roots or both and 71 percent of the subalpine fir were infested may dominate in some cases (Ferguson and others (mostly by wood borers). Bark beetle infestation 1960; Ryan and others 1988; Ryan and Reinhardt usually occurred in trees having 50 percent or more 1988). Resistance to cambium injury increases with • basal girdling by fire. However, uninjured Douglas­ the square of the bark thickness (compare Martin fir also had 46 percent of the trees infested in 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • Improved Population Monitoring of Bark Beetles and Predators by Incorporating Disparate Behavioral Responses to Semiochemicals
    BIOLOGICAL CONTROL Improved Population Monitoring of Bark Beetles and Predators by Incorporating Disparate Behavioral Responses to Semiochemicals 1 2 1 BRIAN H. AUKEMA, DONALD L. DAHLSTEN, AND KENNETH F. RAFFA Environ. Entomol. 29(3): 618Ð629 (2000) ABSTRACT Estimating populations of both pest and natural enemy species is important in the planning and implementation of biological control. For example, synthetic pheromone lures are used to sample bark beetles, and sometimes their predators, in forest ecosystems. However, insect attraction to natural pheromone sources may differ from attraction to synthetic pheromone lures. Moreover, these differences may vary systematically between the target pest and some important natural enemies. Thus, the accuracy of both absolute and relative abundances of bark beetles and predators could vary with lure selection. We evaluated a series of synthetic lures to determine which lure gave the closest approximation to actual numbers of Ips pini (Say) and predators arriving at hosts infested with I. pini in Wisconsin. We deployed synthetic lures containing various ratios of the (ϩ) and (Ϫ) enantiomers of the principal I. pini pheromone component, ipsdienol, with or without an additional component, lanierone. I. pini showed strong preferences for speciÞc enantiomeric ratios of ipsdienol, and these responses were synergized by lanierone. Predators showed equally strong attraction to ipsdienol, but preferred different ratios of the stereoisomers. The addition of lanierone had no effect on predators. The most abundant predator, Thanasimus dubius (F.), showed greater preference for host material infested with I. pini than any synthetic lure. These disparities in responses, combined with strong disparities in seasonal ßight patterns, provided estimates of pest to predator ratios that varied by as little as 12% to as much as 12 times, from pest:predator ratios arriving at host material infested with I.
    [Show full text]
  • A Field Guide to Diseases and Insect Pests of Northern and Central
    2013 Reprint with Minor Revisions A FIELD GUIDE TO DISEASES & INSECT PESTS OF NORTHERN & CENTRAL ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONIFERS HAGLE GIBSON TUNNOCK United States Forest Service Department of Northern and Agriculture Intermountain Regions United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service State and Private Forestry Northern Region P.O. Box 7669 Missoula, Montana 59807 Intermountain Region 324 25th Street Ogden, UT 84401 http://www.fs.usda.gov/main/r4/forest-grasslandhealth Report No. R1-03-08 Cite as: Hagle, S.K.; Gibson, K.E.; and Tunnock, S. 2003. Field guide to diseases and insect pests of northern and central Rocky Mountain conifers. Report No. R1-03-08. (Reprinted in 2013 with minor revisions; B.A. Ferguson, Montana DNRC, ed.) U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, State and Private Forestry, Northern and Intermountain Regions; Missoula, Montana, and Ogden, Utah. 197 p. Formated for online use by Brennan Ferguson, Montana DNRC. Cover Photographs Conk of the velvet-top fungus, cause of Schweinitzii root and butt rot. (Photographer, Susan K. Hagle) Larvae of Douglas-fir bark beetles in the cambium of the host. (Photographer, Kenneth E. Gibson) FIELD GUIDE TO DISEASES AND INSECT PESTS OF NORTHERN AND CENTRAL ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONIFERS Susan K. Hagle, Plant Pathologist (retired 2011) Kenneth E. Gibson, Entomologist (retired 2010) Scott Tunnock, Entomologist (retired 1987, deceased) 2003 This book (2003) is a revised and expanded edition of the Field Guide to Diseases and Insect Pests of Idaho and Montana Forests by Hagle, Tunnock, Gibson, and Gilligan; first published in 1987 and reprinted in its original form in 1990 as publication number R1-89-54.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Improved Pest Risk Analysis Techniques for Quarantine Pests, Using Pinewood Nematode, Bursaphelenchus Xylophilus, in Portugal As a Model System
    PHRAME Final Report Page 1 QLK5-CT-2002-00672: Development of improved pest risk analysis techniques for quarantine pests, using pinewood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, in Portugal as a model system PHRAME – Plant Health Risk And Monitoring Evaluation FINAL REPORT, JULY 2007 Chapter 1 Membership of the PHRAME Consortium and authorship of Chapters and Sections......................7 Chapter 2 Introduction............................................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Background and context .................................................................................................................. 9 2.2 The pest problem ............................................................................................................................. 9 2.3 Approach adopted.......................................................................................................................... 10 Chapter 3 Identification and distribution of nematodes in the genus Bursaphelenchus in Europe................... 12 3.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 12 3.2 Materials and Methods................................................................................................................... 12 3.2.1 Nematode sampling and isolation.............................................................................................. 12 3.2.2 Morphological
    [Show full text]
  • Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of a Tree-Killing Beetle and Its Predator
    Ecography 40: 221–234, 2017 doi: 10.1111/ecog.02046 © 2016 The Authors. Ecography © 2016 Nordic Society Oikos Subject Editor: John Spence. Editor-in-Chief: Jens-Christian Svenning. Accepted 15 February 2016 Spatio-temporal dynamics of a tree-killing beetle and its predator Aaron S. Weed, Matthew P. Ayres, Andrew M. Liebhold and Ronald F. Billings A. S. Weed ([email protected]), National Park Service, 120 Chatham Lane, Fredericksburg, VA 22405, USA. – M. P. Ayres and ASW, Dept of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA. – A. M. Liebhold, USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 180 Canfield St., Morgantown, WV 26505, USA. – R. F. Billings, Texas A&M Forest Service, 200 Technology Way, Suite 1281, College Station, TX 77845, USA. Resolving linkages between local-scale processes and regional-scale patterns in abundance of interacting species is impor- tant for understanding long-term population stability across spatial scales. Landscape patterning in consumer population dynamics may be largely the result of interactions between consumers and their predators, or driven by spatial variation in basal resources. Empirical testing of these alternatives has been limited by the lack of suitable data. In this study, we analyzed an extensive network of spatially replicated time series to characterize the local and regional processes affecting spatio-temporal dynamics of a tree-killing bark beetle (Dendroctonus frontalis or SPB) and its key predator (Thanasimus dubius) across the southeastern United States. We first used a mechanistic model to evaluate factors affecting the stability of 95 predator–prey time series and then conducted spatial analyses to evaluate scale dependence in the factors affecting the geographical patterning of this system.
    [Show full text]