DOCSLIB.ORG

The London School of Economics and Political Science National

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The London School of Economics and Political Science National The London School of Economics and Political Science National institutional contexts and domestic discourse during proposed transformative policy change. The case of telecoms' privatization in Greece and the Republic of Ireland. Christos Dimas A thesis submitted to the European Institute of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, October 2009. 1 UMI Number: U511576 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U511576 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 r Uorarn a**L & » V d'Pr"'" ' 0 ^ W J ; Sc*™** _J Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of the author. I warrant that this authorization does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. 2 Abstract This thesis attempts to unravel the relationship between the national institutional contexts on the one hand, and the forms of the domestic discourse on the other and analyze how that in turn affects the overall policy-making process, in terms of ideas promoted, applied and rejected, during proposed transformative policy change. It maps the pattern linking a nation’s institutional arrangement and its discursive process. Such an approach is valuable as it illustrates why and how the diverse institutional contexts of different countries shape the way transformative changes are publicly legitimized within the policy-making process. It tests the theory of discursive institutionalism, as defined by Vivien Schmidt, by examining the nature of the telecoms privatization discourse in Greece and the Republic of Ireland. This is carried out through a qualitative analysis of primary sources including newspapers, parliamentary archives, documentations of political foundations, manifestos of political parties, press releases by labour unions and industrialist confederations and personal interviews. The goal is to attribute a particular type of discourse depending on the institutional settings within which it takes place. The argument put forward is the following: in simple polities -like Greece- privatization is justified principally on a pro-market ideological basis or an expressed strategic objective. In compound polities -like Ireland- privatization is presented as a socially acceptable managerial adjustment to market needs with minimum references to ideology or strategic objectives. The examination of the privatization discourse exemplifies the various complex issues entailed within the political process of a polity when dealing with transformative changes. It has important implications not only for the two countries under investigation or privatization politics but even for other societies facing large-scale transformative changes as it provides guidance on how the pathways for legitimizing such changes are likely to differ according to the different institutional contexts. 3 Acknowledgements I would like to thank: My academic supervisor Professor Kevin Featherstone, not only because he was always accessible and there for me when I needed him, but mainly for his psychological support when things were heading towards the wrong direction. My advisor Dr Eiko Thielemann for all of the time he spent reading and re-reading numerous drafts but always coming up with good comments and giving me courage to continue. The Alexander S. Onassis Public Benefit Foundationfor its invaluable support throughout the years. My parents, as nothing would have been possible without them. My sister Antigone and my brother Costas for standing by me and their overall support throughout my studies. Mr loannis Palaiokrassas, because in a moment of panic, he was there to save the day. The Constantine Mitsotakis Foundation for its excellent studying environment and because it gives students the opportunity to access important files instantly without bureaucratic delays. Professor Theodore Kouloumbis, Dr Bob Hancke, Dr Mark Thatcher, Dr Giorgos Pagoulatos, Dr Sotiria Theodoropoulou and Dr Andreas Antoniades for the time each of them spent, in order to give me helpful advice. All of my friends but especially: Ellie, Costas and Avgoustinos for their patience, tolerance and hospitality. Mr Konstantin Kostopoulos for his kindness to help me find access to some of the data which was much needed. 4 To my mother Alkistis and my father Stavros 5 Table of Contents A. Declaration B. Abstract C. Acknowledgments D. Table of Contents E. Table of Figures F. Abbreviations Chapter 1: Discursive Institutionalism and Transformative Policy Changes like Privatization 1. Purpose of chapter 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Privatization, national institutional contexts and particular types of discourse 1.3 Hypothesis 1.4 Dependent variable: Arguments in the discourse as a means to legitimate privatization 1.4.1 Ideological grounds 1.4.2 Strategic reasons: Financial motives and EU constraints 1.4.3 Financial reasons 1.4.4 EU as a perceived constraint 1.4.5 Managerial adjustment to market needs 1.5 Privatization politics: actors, strategies and methods 1.5.1 Privatization actors 1.5.2 Privatization Strategies 1.5.3 Privatization methods 1.6 Sector selection: telecoms 1.7 New Institutionalism 1.8 Discursive institutionalism as a theoretical framework 1.9 Contribution, Methodology and possible different approaches 1.10 Conclusion Chapter 2: Ireland and Greece: Two Most Similar Cases in the ‘80s with Different Outcomes in the ‘90s 2. Purpose of Chapter 2.1 Justifying the selection of the time-frame 6 2.2 Ireland and Greece: Parallel paths in the 1980s 2.3 Ideological standings of Irish political parties 2.4 Ideological standings of Greek political parties 2.5 Political and economic mismanagement in Ireland 2.6 Political and economic mismanagement in Greece 2.7 Conclusion Chapter 3: Ireland 1987-1992. from Simple to Compound Polity 3. Introduction 3.1 The run-up to the 1987 elections: Privatization and neo-liberalism on the agenda 3.2 Institutional metamorphosis in Ireland: from simple to compound polity 3.3 Telecom Eireann (TE) during the ‘Smurfit years’ (1983-1991) and privatization 3.4 First privatizations 3.5 From Haughey to Reynolds 3.6 Conclusion Chapter 4: Greece 1990-1993: Privatization in the Name of European Integration 4. Introduction 4.1 Lack of a coordinative privatization discourse 4.2 Communicative privatization discourse 4.3 Failing to privatize OTE 4.4 OTE privatization politics 4.5 Conclusion Chapter 5: Ireland 1992-1997. TE’s Privatization as an Adjustment to the Market Needs 5. Introduction 5.1 The pro and anti-privatization agenda in the 1992 elections 5.2 TE’s alleged strategic alliance 5.3 Forming the ‘Rainbow Coalition’ and agreeing on the TE strategic alliance 5.4 TE’s privatization 5.5 Conclusion 7 Chapter 6: PASOK’s Europeanization and the Unsuccessful Attempts to Privatize OTE 6. Introduction 6.1 PASOK’s adjustment to Europeanization 6.2 Setting the government agenda and (re)adjusting it to the EU requirements 6.3 Failing to privatize OTE again and again 6.4 Conclusion Chapter 7: Ireland 1997-2000. Social Actors Requesting More Rather than Less TE Privatization 7. Introduction 7.1 The pattern of the privatization discourse in the 1997 electoral campaign 7.2 The FF-PD coalition and the agreement on the TE privatization 7.3 Privatization of TE, part II 7.4 Conclusion Chapter 8: Greece 1996-2000 Privatizing in the Run-up to EMU 8. Introduction 8.1 The strategic objective of EMU membership and the first OTE privatization 8.2 Increasing the privatization pace, aiming at EMU participation 8.3 Privatization as a tool to achieve EMU participation 8.4 Conclusion Chapter 9: Conclusions 9. Thesis purpose 9.1 Testing discursive institutionalism 9.2 Testing the hypothesis 9.2.1 Simple polity (Greece): Gathering privatization momentum from Europe 9.2.2 Compound polity (Ireland): Privatization as a managerial adjustment to market needs 9.2.3 Conclusion of the empirical findings 9.3 Recent developments in Greece and Ireland 9.4 Discourse analysis and comparative politics 9.5 Conclusion 8 X. Bibliographical References Appendix 1 Personal Interviews Table of Figures Chapter 1 1.1 Arenas-Fora Continuum 1.2 Governance Practices in Simple and Compound Polities 1.3 Coordinative & Communicative Discourse in Simple & Compound Polities 1.4 1st part of hypothesis: simple polities 1.5 2nd part of hypothesis: compound polities 1.6 EU Member States: Privatization Methods in Telecoms (1984-2000) 1.7 Telecom Privatization Revenues among EU Member States (1984-2000) Chapter 2 2.1 GDP Growth Rate 2.2 Unemployment Rate by
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Analyzing the Telecoms Privatization in Greece from a ‘Discursive Institutionalist’ Perspective
    Privatization in the Name of ‘Europe’: analyzing the telecoms privatization in Greece from a ‘discursive institutionalist’ perspective Christos Dimas GreeSE Paper No 41 Hellenic Observatory Papers on Greece and Southeast Europe NoveNovembermber 2010 All views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Hellenic Observatory or the LSE © Christos Dimas _ Table of Contents ABSTRACT ______________________________________________________ iii 1. Introduction______________________________________________________ 1 2. Theoretical Background ____________________________________________ 4 2.1. Discursive institutionalism _______________________________________ 4 2.2. Europe as a legitimating factor ___________________________________ 6 3. The case-study ___________________________________________________ 10 3.1. The pro and anti European politics in Greece during the 1970s and 1980s 10 3.2. The Greek disjointed corporatist system ____________________________ 15 3.3. OTE as a case study ___________________________________________ 17 4. Empirical Analysis _______________________________________________ 19 4.1. The Mitsotakis government 1990-1993 ____________________________ 19 4.2. Papandreou governments 1993-1996 ______________________________ 24 4.3. The Simitis governments 1996-2004 ______________________________ 32 4.4. The Karamanlis governments 2004-2009 __________________________ 37 5. Conclusion______________________________________________________ 41 References ________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • West European Politics the Transformation of the Greek Party
    This article was downloaded by: [Harvard University] On: 11 July 2010 Access details: Access Details: [subscription number 915668586] Publisher Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37- 41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK West European Politics Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713395181 The transformation of the Greek party system since 1951 Takis S. Pappasa a Politics at the Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece To cite this Article Pappas, Takis S.(2003) 'The transformation of the Greek party system since 1951', West European Politics, 26: 2, 90 — 114 To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/01402380512331341121 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402380512331341121 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Greek Economic and Military Mobilization of the 1909-1923 Period.1
    Journal of Military and Strategic VOLUME 20, ISSUE 1 Studies The Economic forces of victory versus those of defeat: An analysis of the Greek Economic and Military Mobilization of the 1 1909-1923 period. Dr. Ioannis-Dionysios Salavrakos (*) Introduction. The intellectual aspiration of the paper is to highlight the economic forces, which played an immense role in the wars in which Greece participated during the 1909-1923 period. These were four major conflicts: The two Balkan wars of 1912-1913 against the Ottoman Empire and Bulgaria; the First World War (1914-1918) and the Greek-Turkish war of 1919-1922. The tragic period started with Greek victories and ended with the greatest defeat of the modern Greek state. Although these conflicts were different, there is a clear nexus between them. In the Greek as well as the international bibliography, the majority of studies highlight the strategic, tactical, operational, diplomatic, psychological dimensions of the conflicts of the period, as well as, the personal motives of political and military leaders. Under this intellectual framework, the economic forces of the conflict are marginalized by most academics. The final conflict of the period is primarily known as the ‘Campaign of Asia-Minor’ in the Greek bibliography, whereas in the Turkish bibliography it is considered as ‘the Great Patriotic War.’ Thus in this article we aim to demonstrate that the conflicts of the period are connected and also that the Greek defeat 1 This article is dedicated to the memory of my beloved grandmother Stavroula Poulea Koutsikou (1921- 2019) who passed away. She had lived the Second World War and had told me many stories from that era.
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining Change in Greek Policy on EU-Turkey Relations 1996-1999: the Prime Minister’S Leadership Style and the Formulation of the Helsinki Strategy
    1 The London School of Economics and Political Science Explaining Change in Greek Policy on EU-Turkey Relations 1996-1999: The Prime Minister’s Leadership Style and the Formulation of the Helsinki Strategy Kyriakos Moumoutzis A thesis submitted to the European Institute of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, July 2009 UMI Number: U615703 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615703 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 -11 j* j i i y & M ) : ? -a - +x 'S -< -1 12.155M- 2 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made.
    [Show full text]
  • George C. Bitros
    WORKING PAPER SERIES 06-2017 Germany and Greece: A mapping of their great divide and its EU implications George C. Bitros Πατησίων 76, 104 34 Αθήνα. Tηλ.: 210 8203303‐5 / Fax: 210 8238249 76, Patission Street, Athens 104 34 Greece. Tel.: (+30) 210 8203303‐5 / Fax: (+30) 210 8238249 E‐mail: [email protected] / www.aueb.gr 1 Germany and Greece: A mapping of their great divide and its EU implications By George C. Bitros Emeritus Professor of Political Economy Athens University of Economics and Business Abstract The economic constitutions of Germany and Greece have resulted in the postwar period in two economies that are based on two vastly different philosophies. Germany has built a highly competitive, outward looking economy based essentially on the principles of the so-called “Social Market Economy”, whereas Greece has set up a “state-managed econ- omy” by drawing on the principles of central planning and administrative controls. This divide is equally stark, if assessed on the basis of the performance of the two economies. For, as it is known by now, Germany has become once again the powerhouse of Europe while Greece has gone bankrupt. As to the implications of this great divide for the future of the EU, its identification and mapping helps understand why convergence criteria on the basis of economic performance and living standards should be abandoned in favor of criteria based on the widening and deepening of the four European freedoms. A multi- speed Euroland enmeshed in these freedoms is going to be more democratic, more cohe- sive and a much happier union for the European citizens to call homeland.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Elections 2012: a Political Crisis As an Anti-Marketing Tool for Traditional Parties
    American International Journal of Contemporary Research Vol. 3 No. 1; January 2013 Greek Elections 2012: A Political Crisis as an Anti-Marketing Tool for Traditional Parties Dr. Nasios Orinos European University Cyprus Kastorias 6A, Lykavitos, 1055, Nicosia, Cyprus Abstract This article strives to answer the question how a political crisis can be an anti-marketing tool for traditional parties. It presents a road map of the 2012 Greek Parliamentary Elections. It begins with a discussion of the context within which the elections have taken part, explaining how the memorandum and the bailout agreement imposed have impacted the country. It reviews the Greek election law and discusses the campaign strategies and tactics that have been used historically. But foremost the article tries to bridge between the two elections, 6th of May 2012 and 17th of June 2012, presenting the strategies used in those, while discussing and analyzing the campaigns used by the two major parties now in Greece, New Democracy and SYRIZA. It concludes by presenting the results of the two elections noting the huge percentage drop of PASOK and the end of two-party system, synthesizing it with the impact these results will have on the country. Keywords: Pasok , Syriza, New Democracy, Memorandum 1. Introduction Newman (1999) highlighted that marketing strategy lies at the heart of electoral success because it induces a campaign to put together, in a relatively short period of time, a forceful organization that mobilizes support and generates a winning coalition of disparate and sometimes conflicting groups. Garecht (2010) has posed a question. Why on earth would we want to get involved in politics? As he noted, the political lifestyle seems enjoyable.
    [Show full text]
  • Technocratic Governments: Power, Expertise and Crisis Politics in European Democracies
    The London School of Economics and Political Science Technocratic Governments: Power, Expertise and Crisis Politics in European Democracies Giulia Pastorella A thesis submitted to the European Institute of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy London, February 2016 1 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 86852 words, excluding bibliography, appendix and annexes. Statement of joint work Chapter 3 is based on a paper co-authored with Christopher Wratil. I contributed 50% of this work. 2 Acknowledgements This doctoral thesis would have not been possible without the expert guidance of my two supervisors, Professor Sara Hobolt and Doctor Jonathan White. Each in their own way, they have been essential to the making of the thesis and my growth as an academic and as an individual. I would also like to thank the Economic and Social Research Council for their generous financial support of my doctoral studies through their scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • Stan Draenos
    UNITED STATES FOREIGN POLICY AND THE LIBERAL AWAKENING IN GREECE, 1958-1967 Stan Draenos ABSTRACT: This paper traces the evolution and outcome of the US opening to the Greek Center triggered by the May 1958 parliamentary elections. It focuses on the role which that opening played in the liberal awakening that took shape under the banner of the Center Union (CU) party, founded in September 1961. After John F. Kennedy assumed the US presidency (January 1961), New Frontier liberals, including Andreas Papandreou, son of CU leader George Papandreou, pushed more aggressively for this opening, which was validated by the Center Union’s rise to power in November 1963, the same month as the Kennedy assassination. During the Johnson Administration, US liberal policies in Greece were tested and found wanting, as Cold War fears trumped the US embrace of reform and change in Greece. The American retreat drove US policies towards bankruptcy, culminating in an uneasy acceptance of the 1967 Greek military dictatorship, wreaking permanent damage on Greek–US relations. The US enunciation of the Truman Doctrine on March 12, 1947 was a defining moment for the two countries most directly involved: the United States and Greece. For the US, intervention to defeat the Greek Left in the Civil War (1946-1949) marked the advent of its Cold War rivalry with the Soviet Union. For Greece, it marked the beginning of a deep and complicated dependency relationship with the global super power that had replaced Great Britain as the protector of Western interests in the Eastern Mediterranean.1 As President Dwight D.
    [Show full text]
  • Koliastasis P Phd 280714.Pdf
    Title The permanent campaign strategy of Greek Prime Ministers (1996–2011) Candidate Panagiotis Koliastasis Degree This thesis is submitted in fulfillment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 4 Abstract Various academic authors have analysed the implementation, the causes and the impact of the permanent campaign strategy by political executives in presidential and parliamentary systems, notably the United States and United Kingdom. This study builds on this literature and extends the research on the permanent campaign in the European parliamentary majoritarian context by examining contemporary Greece as a national case study. In particular, the study addresses three questions. First, did contemporary Greek Prime Ministers adopt the permanent campaign strategy? Second, why did they do so? Third, what impact did the implementation of the permanent campaign have on their public approval? The research focuses on the cases of three successive Prime Ministers in Greece: Costas Simitis (1996–2004), Kostas Karamanlis (2004–2009) and George Papandreou (2009-2011). Simitis and Papandreou were leaders of the centre-left PASOK, while Karamanlis was the leader of the centre-right New Democracy. The study finds that all three Prime Ministers undertook the permanent campaign strategy in order to maintain public approval, aligning themselves with their British and American counterparts. They established new communication units within the primeministerial apparatus, consulted with communication professionals to form a coherent communication
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Varied & Holistic Models in The
    ISSN: 2186-845X ISSN: 2186-8441 Print アシエン ヅロナル オフ メネゲメント サイネセゾ アナド エグケサン Vol. 1. No. 2. July 2012 THE DEVELOPMENT OF VARIED & HOLISTIC MODELS IN THE GREEK ECONOMY FROM POST WWII TO THE PRESENT AND BEYOND Dimitrios Nikolaou Koumparoulis1, Kit Chee Wong2, Nik Chong Teck Siong3, Naganathan Venkatesh4 1Professor of Economics, UGSM-Monarch Business School SWITZERLAND, 2 Adjunct (Visiting) Professor of Management, UGSM-Monarch Business School, Zug SWITZERLAND, 2Adjunct Faculty University of Wales UK, 3Adjunct Faculty, Anglia Ruskin University UK 3University of Glamorgan UK, 3Staffordshire University UK, 4NITTTR, INDIA. [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT Over the past 50 years Greece has grown much faster than most of the countries that had comparable per capita GDP’s in 1950, reaching a per capita GDP of $30,603 today. In 1950, Greece was ranked 28th in the world for per capita GDP, while in 1970 it was ranked 20th. During the 80s, despite membership in the EC, Greece suffered from poor macroeconomic performance due to expansionary fiscal policies that led to a tripling of the debt-to-GDP ratio, which went from the modest figure of 34.5% in 1981 to the triple digits by the 90s. The second oil shock after the Iranian Revolution hurt Greece, and the 80s were racked by high inflation as politicians pursued populist policies. The average rate of inflation in Greece during the 80s was 19%, which was three times the EU average. The Greek budget deficit also rose very substantially during the 80s, peaking at 9% in 1985.
    [Show full text]
  • Unisci Dp 23
    UNISCI Discussion Papers, Nº 23 (May / Mayo 2010) ISSN 1696-2206 TURKISH-GREEK RELATIONS AND THE CYPRUS QUESTION: QUO VADIS? 1 Fuat Aksu 2 Yildiz Technical University Abstract: It can be claimed that the most disruptive factor in the intransigent relations between Turkey and Greece is the absence of a platform for dialogue and negotiation where constructive relations might be developed. The efforts made towards dialogue and negotiation, initiated from time to time, were inadequate given the absence of trust and security between the two countries. The process of moderate dialogue and confidence building measures initiated after the crisis of the 1990s created the basis for the bilateral détente in 1999. During this period, once the EU conferred candidate status on Turkey, the questions between Turkey and Greece were moved from the traditional sphere to the European platform. In other words, relations and disputes were “Europeanized”. In the post-1999 period, bilateral relations were developed under the axis of conditionality and Europeanization. Even though this situation created an appropriate basis for the development of dialogue and cooperation, it was not able to mark an improvement in solving the fundamental questions. In particular, the acceptance of the Greek Cypriots into the European Union despite their rejection of the Annan Plan altered the balance against Turkish Cypriots and Turkey, and thus Turkish criticism of the European Union increased. The détente process reinforced the opinion that it was possible to live with the over-securitized problems of the past and increase the level of tolerance in bilateral realtions. However, tense relations which the “European anchor” can prevent at present might take shape in the foreseeable future, if the European Union cannot provide full membership to Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Unisci Dp 23
    ISSN 1696-2206 Nº 23 May /Mayo 2010 TURKEY/TURQUÍA (Mustafa Aydin, Coord.) UNISCI Nur Bilge Criss Parameters of Turkish Foreign Policy under the AKP Governments UNIDAD DE Gencer Özcan The Changing Role of Turkey’s Military in Foreign Policy- INVESTIGACIÓN Making Process SOBRE SEGURIDAD Y Gokhan Bacik The Rise of Identity Politics in Turkey COOPERACIÓN INTERNACIONAL Bican Şahin & Transnational Advocacy Networks in Perspective: Mete Yıldız Democratization, Human Rights and NGOs in Turkey Ahmet K. Han From “Strategic Partnership” to “Model Partnership”: AKP, RESEARCH Turkish-US Relation and the Prospects under Obama UNIT ON INTERNATIONAL Mert Bilgin Turkey’s energy strategy: What difference does it make to SECURITY AND become an energy transit corridor, hub or center? COOPERATION Sinem Akgül Cycles of Europeanization in Turkey: Açıkme şe The Domestic Impact of EU Political Conditionality Meliha Benli Turkey’s Changing Middle East Policy Altunı şık Özlem Tür Turkish-Syrian Relations – Where are we going? Mustafa Aydın Turkey´s Caucasus Policy Diba Nigar Goksel The Rubik’s Cube of Turkey - Armenia Relations Fuat Aksu Turkish-Greek Relations and the Cyprus Question: Quo Vadis? n CENTRAL ASIA / ASIA CENTRAL Licinia Simao An improbable partnership: Spanish and Kazakh efforts to bring Central Asia to the fore of European politics Disponible on -line: Available on-line: www.ucm.es/ info/unisci UNISCI Discussion Papers UNISCI Discussion Papers (ISSN 1696-2206) es una revista científica de acceso abierto, con sistema de evaluación por pares, sobre Relaciones Internacionales y Seguridad; ambas entendidas en sentido amplio y desde un enfoque multidimensional, abierto a diferentes perspectivas teóricas. La revista es publicada tres veces al año —enero, mayo y octubre— por la Unidad de Investigación sobre Seguridad y Cooperación Internacional (UNISCI) de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
    [Show full text]