DOCSLIB.ORG

AGRICULTURE in LOWLAND MESOPOTAMIA in the LATE URUK^EARLY DYNASTIC PERIOD by MICHAEL P. CHARLES Thesis Submitted in Fulfillment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AGRICULTURE in LOWLAND MESOPOTAMIA in the LATE URUK^EARLY DYNASTIC PERIOD by MICHAEL P. CHARLES Thesis Submitted in Fulfillment AGRICULTURE IN LOWLAND MESOPOTAMIA IN THE LATE URUK^EARLY DYNASTIC PERIOD by MICHAEL P. CHARLES Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Ph.D in the Institute of Archaeology, University College, London 1989 1 "Much is known about the archaeology and history of this land. Most studies however do not give a good description of agriculture as almost nothing is known on the subject. History is made in the cities. A golden age in history is not always a golden age in agriculture!" (Buringh 1960 p. 60) \ 2 Abstract The thesis reviewed the current state of archaeobotanical research in Mesopotamia and considered its significance for the study of Bronze Age agriculture of Lowland Mesopotamia. The climate, natural hydrology and geology of the area were described, with a view to assessing the impact of irrigation on the soils. The traditional irrigation practices of southern Iraq were discussed in relation to modern theory of irrigation and the applicability of the traditional system to that of the Sumerian * s. The types of agriculture practised in the irrigated arid region of Mesopotamia were examined with reference to modern irrigation agriculture theory. This centered on the agricultural systems seen in Lowland Mesopotamia in the early part of the twentieth-century and the way in which they were adapted to the particular local environmental conditions. The recovery, nature and possible modes of arrival of the Tell Abu Salabikh plant remains were considered in the light of the seasonality, ecology and potential uses of the plants. The characteristics of the weed seeds used to group the plants according to crop processing behaviour for the statistical analysis were explained. Statistical analyses of the Abu Salabikh plant remains were undertaken and comparisons were made with data from modern ethnographic studies. The implications of plant material derived from animal dung on the interpretation of crop husbandry and environmental conditions from plant remains recovered from archaeological sites were discussed. The data generated was used to consider currently held views on irrigation agriculture in Bronze Age Lowland Mesopotamia, which have used the existing plant remains and the information derived from the archaeological and cuneiform records. 3 Contents Chapter 1 Archaeobotany in Lowland Mesopotamia 21 1.1 The Area of Study 23 1.2 Climate, Physiography and Vegetation of Mesopotamia 25 1.2.1 Upland Mesopotamia 25 1.2.1.1 The Mountain Region 25 1.2.1.2 The Upper Plains and Foothills Region 26 1.2.1.3 The Desert Plateau Region 27 1.2.2 Lowland Mesopotamia 27 1.2.2.1 The Lower Mesopotamia Region 28 1.3 ’Traces of Plant Remains* 29 1.3.1 ’Revolutions* in Archaeobotany 30 1.3.1.1 Large-scale Recovery of Charred Plant Remains Using Water Flotation 30 1.3.1.2 Ethnological Study of Traditional Agricultural Practices 32 1.4 Mesopotamian Plant Remains. 32 1.4.1 Upland Mesopotamia - The Sourceof Crop Plants 33 1.4.2 The Plant Remains of Lowland Mesopotamia 35 1.4.2.1 The Material 36 1.4.2.2 The Method and Scale of Charred Plant Recovery 37 1.4.2.3 Identifications - Reliability and Cross Applicability 38 1.4.2.4 Discussion of the Lowland Mesopotamian Plant Remains 39 1.4.2.5 Conclusions - Agriculture in Lowland Mesopotamia 41 Chapter 2 Irrigation in Lowland Mesopotamia 54 2.1 Introduction 54 2.2 Climate 54 4 2.2.1 Rainfall 55 2.2.1.1 Effective Rainfall 56 2.2.1.2 Rainfall and Sowing 57 2.2.2 Water and Plant Development 57 2.2.2.1 Rainfall and Germination 58 2.2.2.2 Rainfall and Vegetative Growth 59 2.2.2.3 Flowering and Fruiting 59 2.2.2.4 Conclusions 60 2.2.3 Temperature 60 2.2.3.1 Climate arid Evaporation 60 2.2.3.2 Temperature and Vegetation 62 2.3 Hydrology 63 2.3.1 Stages of the River 65 2.3.1.1 Flood Plains 65 2.3.1.2 Delta Plains 66 2.3.2 River Borne Material 66 2.3.2.1 Sediment 66 2.3.2.2 Salt 67 2.3.3 River Soils 67 2.3.3.1 Flood Plain 67 2.3.3.2 Delta Plain 68 2.3.3.3 Agricultural Suitability of River Soils 69 2.4 Irrigation Theory 69 2.4.1 Introduction 69 2.4.2 Types of Irrigation in S.Iraq 70 2.4.2.1 Surface or Flood Irrigation 70 2.4.2.2 Sub-surface Irrigation 71 2.4.3 Factors Affecting Irrigation Decisions 72 2.4.3.1 Hydraulic Factors 72 2.4.3.2 Soil Factors 73 2.4.4 Movement of Water into the Rooting Zone 73 2.5 Irrigation Practice in S.Iraq 1900-60 (A.D.) 75 2.5.1 Description of the Irrigation Methods 76 5 2.5.1.1 Wild Flooding 76 2.5.1.2 Border Strip Irrigation 77 2.5.1.3 Basins 7 7 2.5.1.4 Furrow Irrigation 79 2.5.2 Water Lifting Machinery 80 2.5.3 Water Stress and the Frequency of Irrigation 81 2.5.4 Winter, Spring and Summer Cultivation 82 2.6 Soils and Irrigation in S.Iraq 83 2.6.1 Soil Texture and Structure 83 2.6.2 The Mechanical Action of Water on Soil 84 2.6.3 Irrigation soils 85 2.7 The Impact of Irrigation on the soils of the Lower Mesopotamian Plain 87 2.7.1 Salt and Irrigation Agriculture 89 2.7.2 Amelioration of Soil Salinity 92 2.7.2.1 Tillage and Salinity 92 2.7.2.2 Soil Fertility and Salinity 93 2.7.3 Leaching and Drainage 95 2.7.3.1 Leaching Requirement 96 2.7.3.2 Method of Leaching 96 2.7.4 Silt and Irrigation Agriculture 97 2.7.4.1 Sediment Deposition 97 2.7.4.2 The Impact of Fine Sediment on the Soils of the Lower Mesopotamian Plain 98 2.7.5 The Life Expectancy of soils of the Lower Mesopotamian Plain under Irrigation 99 Chapter 3 Agriculture in Lowland Mesopotamia 103 3.1 Introduction 103 3.2 Extensive farming; Winter Field Crops 107 3.2.1 Pre-sowing Tillage 107 6 3.2.2 Sowing to Harvest 109 3.2.2.1 Sowing 109 3.2.2.2 Irrigation 112 3.2.2.3 Manuring 113 3.2.2.4 Weeds and Weeding 114 3.2.2.5 Harvest 116 3.2.3 Post Harvest Events 117 3.2.4 Summer Field Crops 119 3.3 More Intensive Crop Growing Practices 120 3.3.1 Semi-intensive Cultivation 120 3.3.2 Intensive Cultivation 120 3.3.2.1 Winter Crops 122 3.3.2.2 Spring Crops 122 3.3.2.3 Summer Crops 122 3.4 Alternatives to Field Based Cultivation 123 3.4.1 Date Palm Orchards 123 3.4.1.1 Date Palm Cultivation 124 3.5 The Cultivation of Seasonally Exposed Soils 127 3.5.1 Rivers and Canal Banks 127 3.5.2 Cultivation of Marsh Edges 127 3.6 Other Aspects of Tradtional S.Iraqi Farming 129 3.6.1 Fallow 129 3.6.1.1 Fallow and Soil Fertility 130 3.6.2 Pasture, Grazing and Fodder 131 3.6.2.1 Pasture and Grazing 131 3.6.2.2 Cereal Grain as Fodder 132 Chapter 4 Abu Salabikh; site, sampling and plant recovery (The origin, identification and preliminary comments on the plant remains at Abu Salabikh) 135 4.1 The Site of Abu Salabikh 135 4.1.1 Location 135 4.1.2 Climate 136 4.1.3 Soils 136 4.1.4 Archaeology 136 4.1.4.1 Date of the Material 137 4.2 Archaeobotanical Sampling at Abu Salabikh 138 4.2.1 Introduction 138 4.2.2 Contexts Sampled 138 4.2.3 Method of flotation 140 4.2.4 Sample Sorting 142 4.3 The Abu Salabikh Plant Remains 142 4.3.1 Preservation 143 4.3.2 Identification 144 4.3.3 Identification Criteria 144 4.3.3.1 Cultivated Plants 144 4.3.3.2 Non Cultivated Plants 149 4.4 Non Cultivated Plants at Abu Salabikh 158 4.4.1 ’Modes of Arrival* 158 4.5 Seasonality 161 4.6 Habitat Preference and Plant Distribution 165 4.6.2.1 Winter Plants 167 4.6.2.2 Early Summer Plants 168 4.6.2.3 Summer Growing Plants 168 4.7 The Uses of Non Cultivated Plants 169 4.7.1 Crop Weeds 169 4.7.2 Plants Collected as Human Food Plants 170 4.7.3 Plants used in Manufacture and Furnishings 170 4.7.4 Miscellaneous Uses of Plants 170 4.7.5 Fodder species; Grazing Potential 171 4. 7.5.1 Winter Plants 172 4. 7. 5.2 Early Summer Plants 172 8 4.7.5.3 Summer Plants 172 4.7.5.4 Crop Weed and Fodder 173 4.7.5.5 Fodder and Fuel Plants 174 4.8 Weed Seed Categories 174 4.8.1 Seed Size 175 4.8.2 Headedness 176 4.8.3 Aero-dynamics 176 4.8.4 The Effect of Glume Wheat Processing on Weed Seeds 176 4.9 Miscellaneous Non Seed Material 178 4.9.1 Reed Culm Node Fragments 178 4.9.2 Cyperus rotundus Tuber 179 4.9.3 Culm Nodes and Non Cereal Grasses 180 4.9.4 Animal Dung Material 180 4.10 Cultivated Plants (Non Cereal) 181 Chapter 5 Analysis of the Abu Salabikh Plant Remains 191 5.1 Preliminary Comments on the Cereal Remains 191 5.1.1 Barley Material 191 5.1.2 Wheat Material 194 5.1.3 The Cereal Remains as a Whole 196 5.2 Introduction to the Computer Aided Analysis of the Abu Salabikh Plant Remains; Internal and External Analysis 198 5.2.1 Internal Analyses 198 5.2.1.1 Principal Components Analysis (P.C.A.) 199 5.2.1.2 Cluster Analysis 200 5.2.2 External Analysis 200 5.2.2.1 Discriminant Analysis - Canonical Variates Analysis method 200 5.3 Cereal Material 201 9 5.3.1 Percentage Square Root (Statistical analysis of the nine cereal types) 201 5.3.2 Unidentified Cereal Items Removed 203 5 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Writing and City Life
    29 THEME2 writing and city life CITY life began in Mesopotamia*, the land between the Euphrates and the Tigris rivers that is now part of the Republic of Iraq. Mesopotamian civilisation is known for its prosperity, city life, its voluminous and rich literature and its mathematics and astronomy. Mesopotamia’s writing system and literature spread to the eastern Mediterranean, northern *The name Syria, and Turkey after 2000 BCE, so that the kingdoms of Mesopotamia is that entire region were writing to one another, and to the derived from the Pharaoh of Egypt, in the language and script of Mesopotamia. Greek words mesos, Here we shall explore the connection between city life and writing, and then look at some outcomes of a sustained meaning middle, tradition of writing. and potamos, In the beginning of recorded history, the land, mainly the meaning river. urbanised south (see discussion below), was called Sumer and Akkad. After 2000 BCE, when Babylon became an important city, the term Babylonia was used for the southern region. From about 1100 BCE, when the Assyrians established their kingdom in the north, the region became known as Assyria. The first known language of the land was Sumerian. It was gradually replaced by Akkadian around 2400 BCE when Akkadian speakers arrived. This language flourished till about Alexander’s time (336-323 BCE), with some regional changes occurring. From 1400 BCE, Aramaic also trickled in. This language, similar to Hebrew, became widely spoken after 1000 BCE. It is still spoken in parts of Iraq. Archaeology in Mesopotamia began in the 1840s. At one or two sites (including Uruk and Mari, which we discuss below), excavations continued for decades.
    [Show full text]
  • SUMERIAN LITERATURE and SUMERIAN IDENTITY My Title Puts
    CNI Publicati ons 43 SUMERIAN LITERATURE AND SUMERIAN IDENTITY JERROLD S. COOPER PROBLEMS OF C..\NONlCl'TY AND IDENTITY FORMATION IN A NCIENT EGYPT AND MESOPOTAMIA There is evidence of a regional identity in early Babylonia, but it does not seem to be of the Sumerian ethno-lingusitic sort. Sumerian Edited by identity as such appears only as an artifact of the scribal literary KIM RYHOLT curriculum once the Sumerian language had to be acquired through GOJKO B AR .I AMOVIC educati on rather than as a mother tongue. By the late second millennium, it appears there was no notion that a separate Sumerian ethno-lingui stic population had ever existed. My title puts Sumerian literature before Sumerian identity, and in so doing anticipates my conclusion, which will be that there was little or no Sumerian identity as such - in the sense of "We are all Sumerians!" ­ outside of Sumerian literature and the scribal milieu that composed and transmitted it. By "Sumerian literature," I mean the corpus of compositions in Sumerian known from manuscripts that date primarily 1 to the first half of the 18 h century BC. With a few notable exceptions, the compositions themselves originated in the preceding three centuries, that is, in what Assyriologists call the Ur III and Isin-Larsa (or Early Old Babylonian) periods. I purposely eschew the too fraught and contested term "canon," preferring the very neutral "corpus" instead, while recognizing that because nearly all of our manuscripts were produced by students, the term "curriculum" is apt as well. 1 The geographic designation "Babylonia" is used here for the region to the south of present day Baghdad, the territory the ancients would have called "Sumer and Akkad." I will argue that there is indeed evidence for a 3rd millennium pan-Babylonian regional identity, but little or no evidence that it was bound to a Sumerian mother-tongue community.
    [Show full text]
  • "Oval" Temples in Southern Mesopotamia
    Dorota Ławecka Early Dynastic "Oval" Temples in Southern Mesopotamia Światowit : rocznik poświęcony archeologii przeddziejowej i badaniom pierwotnej kultury polskiej i słowiańskiej 9 (50)/A, 35-47 2011 Ś wiATowiT · IX (L)/A · 2011 D o r o t a L a w e c k a E a r l y D y n a s t i c “ O v a l ” T e m p l e s in S o u t h e r n M e s o p o t a m i a Three sanctuaries surrounded by an oval perimeter The spot, where the temple was erected, had been wall and dating from tire Early Dynastic Period are known carefully prepared, with a large expenditure of work. The from Southern Mesopotamia.1 One (at Khafajah) is locat­ nearly oval temenos is enclosed with a double line of walls. ed in die Diyala Valley, die remaining two have been dis­ A courtyard stretches between the two walls, near to the covered at die southern sites of Al-Ubaid and Al-Hiba. entrance into the sacred precinct; a house located there Due to their general similarity, these structures are often (called “House D”) is interpreted by P. Delougaz as tire seen and discussed as a single type or interpreted as the dwelling of a priest. The surface of the courtyard raises ca. upshot of a common Mesopotamian tradition of religious 0.7 m above the surrounding ground, so it is accessed via architecture. In bodi case, emphasis is laid on the similari­ four stone steps.
    [Show full text]
  • Eblaites - Oxford Reference
    Eblaites - Oxford Reference https://www-oxfordreference-com.ezaccess.libraries.psu.edu/view/10.10... The Oxford Encyclopedia of Archaeology in the Near East Edited by Eric M. Meyers Publisher: Oxford University Press Print Publication Date: 1997 Print ISBN-13: 9780195065121 Published online: 2011 Current Online Version: 2011 eISBN: 9780199892280 Eblaites. Scholars utilize the ethnonym Eblaites to refer to the people of Ebla, a major Bronze Age city-state in northern Syria. Discussions about the identity of peoples, especially in the Near East, typically rely on factors such as the identification of the language utilized and the gods worshiped. Thus, because the eblaite language is Semitic and many of the gods worshiped at Ebla occur elsewhere in the pantheons of other Semitic peoples, it is generally accepted that the Eblaites were a Semitic people. However, a host of problems specific to refining this statement continues to be debated. The classification of the Eblaite language within the Semitic family of languages is the center of a sharp debate. Some scholars view Eblaite as a dialect of Old Akkadian, in which case it would be proper to speak of the Eblaites as a branch of the East Semites (Akkadians, Assyrians, and Babylonians). Other scholars view Eblaite as a branch of West Semitic, with an especially close relationship to other West Semitic languages utilized in Syria (in particular, the roughly contemporary Amorite and the later-attested Aramaic). The majority of the evidence favors the latter opinion. To cite one example, the Eblaite first-person independent pronoun I is 'ana, exactly as in Amorite and Aramaic.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relevance of the Diyala Sequence to South Mesopotamian Sites
    Ii>' THE RELEVANCE OF THE DIYALA SEQUENCE TO SOUTH MESOPOTAMIAN SITES HE Chicago Oriental Institute excavations in the Diyala region have con- T tributed much to our knowledge of the latter part of the Uruk period (including the Jamdat Nasr phase) as well as to more than six later stages of Mesopotamian history. The ceramic material of these periods has been thoroughly presented in Delougaz's long and valuable publication, Pottery from the Diyala Region. Some early and middle Uruk sherds were found, but not in their proper stratigraphical context; the earliest pottery excavated in situ dates from phases ' c ' and ' d ' of what Delougaz calls the ' Proto literate Period ',1 and these are equivalent to the late Uruk or Jamdat Nasr phase, which extends, in the E-anna sequence, from the end ofWarka IV to the beginning ofWarka II. This material comes from three sites: Tell Asmar, Tell Agrab, and Khafajah. At the two former sites deep soundings driven to virgin soil produced sherds of Protoliterate ' d " but the stratigraphical value of these soundings is limited, as the floor-levels could not be distinguished and the sequence had therefore to be determined by depth. Protoliterate' d ' material also came from in and under the earliest Abu Temple at Tell Asmar. Khafajah, however, produced much well-stratified material, especially from the Sin Temple; this was founded on debris of Protoliterate ' c ' during the same phase, and continuously repaired and rebuilt at least until ED III b. The long sequence based on the Sin Temple stratification is particularly important, as the pottery of Protoliterate ' c ' and , d ' is rather poorly represented at the type-site of Warka itself, and is fortu- nately amplified by reference to the Diyala material.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID Proceedings of the 5Th
    UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID Proceedings of the 5th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Proceedings of the 5th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East Madrid, April 3-8 2006 Edited by Joaquín Mª Córdoba, Miquel Molist, Mª Carmen Pérez, Isabel Rubio, Sergio Martínez (Editores) Madrid, 3 a 8 de abril de 2006 Actas del V Congreso Internacional de Arqueología del Oriente Próximo Antiguo VOL.I Centro Superior de Estudios sobre el Oriente Próximo y Egipto Madrid 2008 Colección Actas © ISBN (OBRA COMPLETA): 978-84-8344-140-4 ISBN (VOL. I): 978-84-8344-141-1 Depósito legal: GU-64/2008 Realiza: Palop Producciones Gráficas. Impreso en España. Diseño de cubierta: M.A. Tejedor. 5th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East V Congreso Internacional de Arqueología del Oriente Próximo Antiguo Scientific Committee Scientific Steering Committee Comité Científico Organizador Comité Científico Permanente Joaquín Mª Córdoba Manfred Bietak Sergio Martínez Barthel Hrouda (honorary member) Miquel Molist Hartmut Kühne Mª Carmen Pérez Jean-Claude Margueron Isabel Rubio Wendy Matthews Paolo Matthiae Diederik Meijer Ingolf Thuesen Irene J. Winter Executive Commission Comisión Ejecutiva Ana Arroyo, Carmen del Cerro, Fernando Escribano, Saúl Escuredo, Alejandro Gallego, Zahara Gharehkhani, Alessandro Grassi, José Manuel Herrero †, Rodrigo Lucía, Montserrat Mañé, Covadonga Sevilla, Elena Torres Technical collaborators Colaboradores técnicos Virginia Tejedor,
    [Show full text]
  • " King of Kish" in Pre-Sarogonic Sumer
    "KING OF KISH" IN PRE-SAROGONIC SUMER* TOHRU MAEDA Waseda University 1 The title "king of Kish (lugal-kiski)," which was held by Sumerian rulers, seems to be regarded as holding hegemony over Sumer and Akkad. W. W. Hallo said, "There is, moreover, some evidence that at the very beginning of dynastic times, lower Mesopotamia did enjoy a measure of unity under the hegemony of Kish," and "long after Kish had ceased to be the seat of kingship, the title was employed to express hegemony over Sumer and Akked and ulti- mately came to signify or symbolize imperial, even universal, dominion."(1) I. J. Gelb held similar views.(2) The problem in question is divided into two points: 1) the hegemony of the city of Kish in early times, 2) the title "king of Kish" held by Sumerian rulers in later times. Even earlier, T. Jacobsen had largely expressed the same opinion, although his opinion differed in some detail from Hallo's.(3) Hallo described Kish's hegemony as the authority which maintained harmony between the cities of Sumer and Akkad in the First Early Dynastic period ("the Golden Age"). On the other hand, Jacobsen advocated that it was the kingship of Kish that brought about the breakdown of the older "primitive democracy" in the First Early Dynastic period and lead to the new pattern of rule, "primitive monarchy." Hallo seems to suggest that the Early Dynastic I period was not the period of a primitive community in which the "primitive democracy" was realized, but was the period of class society in which kingship or political power had already been formed.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology of Mesopotamia Syllabus
    AE0037 Archaeology of Mesopotamia Fall 2006 Artemis A.W. and Martha Sharp Joukowsky Institute for Archaeology and the Ancient World Brown University Syllabus MWF 12:00-12:50 (The so-called E-hour) Salomon Center Room 203 Instructor: Ömür Harmansah (Visiting Assistant Professor) Office Hours: Tuesday 10-12 am. (Or by appointment) Office: Joukowsky Institute (70 Waterman St.) Room 202 E-mail: [email protected] Tel: 401-863-6411 Course website where the up-to-date syllabus can be downloaded: http://www.brown.edu/Departments/Joukowsky_Institute/Harmansah/teach.html Course Description This course offers an analytical survey of the social and cultural history of the Near East, tracing the variety of cultural developments in the region from prehistory to the end of the Iron age (ca. 300 BC). Both archaeological evidence and textual sources are examined as relevant. The material culture and social practices of Mesopotamian societies constitute the main focus of the course. Archaeological landscapes, urban and rural sites, excavated architectural remains and artifacts are critically investigated based on archaeological, anthropological and art-historical work carried out in the region. Relevant ancient texts (mostly in Sumerian, Akkadian, and Luwian in translation) are studied as part of the material culture. Geographically the course will cover Mesopotamia proper, Syria, Anatolia and the Levantine coast (mostly staying within the boundaries of modern-day Iraq, Syria, and Turkey). In order to study the material evidence from antiquity critically, scholars frequently involve interpretive theories in their work. Throughout the semester, along with the detailed reading of various bodies of archaeological evidence, we will investigate a variety of theoretical approaches and concepts used within the field of Near Eastern archaeology.
    [Show full text]
  • Ideology, Social Space & Power in Uruk Societies
    IDEOLOGY, SOCIAL SPACE & POWER IN URUK SOCIETIES. – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NORTH AND SOUTH MESOPOTAMIAN SETTLEMENTS IN THE 4th MILLENNIUM B.C. KJETIL SUNDSDAL MASTERTHESIS IN ARCHAEOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN MAY 2008 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all I would like to thank my dearest girlfriend Veslemøy for endless listening to wining about social theories, ideology and material culture. Her patience and support has been indispensable. She has been responsible for getting me up in the morning, and without her I would never have made it! I owe a special thanks to Nils Anfinset. His inspiring lesson about the Uruk culture caught my interest in the subject, and his guidance has been most valuable. Without him this thesis would not have been written. I would like to thank Professor of Religion Einar Thomassen for discussions and literature about Mesopotamian religion. I would also like to thank my English teacher Elisabeth Hornemann who has corrected my endless mess of fouls, learned and guided me in use of the English language, and Kari Nordmo at the library, who has helped me with orders of books and articles. To my fellow students, and especially Lars Aas and Kjetil Lofsgaarden, I thank you for useful discussions, help and a pleasant working environment. Mr Aas has also lightened the office with inspiring songs. I will thank the archaeological football association for gymnastic lessons between all the studying, and Tor Arne Waraas for a discussion about Gordon Childe. I will thank Professor Guillermo Algaze at university of California, San Diego, Professor Roger Matthews at UCL, Professor Hans Nissen at Freie Universität Berlin and Whiting Professor Glen Schwartz at the John Hopkins University, who have responded to questions on e-mail, and for their inspiring and essentials works.
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture and the City in the Ancient Near East CGS Course / Department of the History of Art/ Fall 2004
    ARTH 224. Architecture and the City in the Ancient Near East CGS Course / Department of the History of Art/ Fall 2004 Instructor : Ömür Harmanşah Depatment of the History of Art University of Pennsylvania Syllabus Class schedule: Wednesdays 5:30 ‐ 8: 30 pm. at Meyerson Hall B6 Office hours: Fridays 10‐12 pm. Jaffe building (by appointment, please e‐mail). E‐mail: [email protected] Blackboard site: https://courseweb.library.upenn.edu/ (Log‐in with your Pennkey) Course web page: http://www.sas.upenn.edu/˜harmansa/arth224.html Course Definition This course is an attempt to provide a selective and analytical survey of the architectural history in the Ancient Near East. Lectures and discussions will particularly focus on the development of urban and architectural traditions in their socio‐cultural and economical context. The extensive geography of the Near Eastern world and the variety of its archaeological landscapes from prehistory into the Hellenistic period will be explored, with particular emphasis on Southern and Northern Mesopotamia, Syria and the Central Anatolian plateau. In the ancient world, unlike the built environments of modernity, monuments were considered as bearers of both textual and pictorial representations. These texts and visual narratives were effective tools in the construction of social identity and historical consciousness among the public. Especially throughout the history of the Near Eastern world, the construction of buildings coincided precisely with the writing of history, a fundamental challange to their makers and their audience alike. This course intends to see the production of architectural space in this light, as a social enterprise, a festive event where the economic and socio‐cultural resources of a society are diverted into a productive undertaking.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sumerian Takeoff
    UC Irvine Structure and Dynamics Title The Sumerian Takeoff Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/76r673km Journal Structure and Dynamics, 1(1) Author Algaze, Guillermo Publication Date 2005-09-18 DOI 10.5070/SD911003264 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Introduction Economic geographers seeking to understand how substantial variations in population concentration and economic activity are created across the landscape correctly note that, except in cases of colonial imposition, such variations are always the result of cumulative processes whereby initial natural advantages of particular sites or areas are extended and compounded by socially created technologies and institutions delivering increasing returns to scale. In this manner, they argue, self-reinforcing processes of accumulation, exchange, agglomeration, and innovation are created that ultimately determine the varying developmental trajectories of different regions and the location, number, and rate of growth of cities within them (Krugman 1991, 1995, 1998; Pred 1966). The economist Paul Krugman (1996a) vividly illustrates this process in reference to the process of expansion of Chicago in the 19th century, as outlined by the historian William Cronon (1991) in his book Nature’s Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West. Cronon insightfully distinguishes between two settings in which the evolution of Chicago took place. The first was its “natural landscape,” entirely determined by geography and environment. The second was what he terms the “created landscape,” which resulted from human innovations and institutions that substantially altered and reshaped Chicago’s natural setting and significantly expanded the advantages of the city’s initial location for human settlement. Cronon argues that in the modern world the created landscape has become more important than the natural landscape as a determinant of urban location and regional developmental rates.
    [Show full text]
  • A STUDY of DIET in MESOPOTAMIA (C.3000
    A STUDY OF DIET IN MESOPOTAMIA (c.3000 - 600 BC) AND ASSOCIATED AGRICULTURAL TECHNIQUES AND METHODS OF FOOD PREPARATION by Elizabeth Rosemary Ellison Institute of Archaeology Thesis submitted to the University of London in the Faculty of Arts for the Degree of Doctor of.Philosophy May 1978 IBIBiN (LONDIN. UNIV. ABSTRACT This study has been undertaken in order to find out what were the main foodstuffs consumed by the people of Mesopotamia, whether they would have provided an adequate diet containing all the essential nutrients, and whether the foodstuffs could have been supplied locally. Agricultural techniques have been looked at to see how efficiently and in what quantities food crops were produced and the methods of food preparation have been examined in order to see in what form the food- stuffs were consumed. The modern climate and countryside are outlined and the evidence for the ancient climate and changes in the courses of the rivers are set against them. The sources of evidence used can be divided into three main categories. These are: direct evidence of food sources from excava- tions - that is, botanical and zoological remains indicating the existence of specific cereals, vegetables, meat-animals etc, at a given place and at a . given point of time; indirect evidence from excavations such as tools and artefacts which could have been used in the production and preparation of food, representations of plants, animals, food- preparation and consumption on cylinder seals, stone reliefs, pottery, inlay work, jewellery etc; and evidence from cuneiform tablets of the variety of foodstuffs known, and in many cases, of the amounts of foodstuffs eaten.
    [Show full text]