7367-7373 Derailment Case

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

7367-7373 Derailment Case NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD RAIL SAFETY SECTION PTSB CASES #7367 AND #7373 INVESTIGATION OF TWO DERAILMENTS INVOLVING THE MTA - LONG ISLAND RAIL ROAD ON #73 SWITCH IN JAY INTERLOCKING, JAMAICA, NEW YORK ON JANUARY 23, 2003 AND JANUARY 25, 2003 SYNOPSIS On Thursday, January 23, 2003 eastbound equipment train #3800 derailed in the Jay Interlocking which is located in Jamaica, Queens, New York. The rear wheel set on the third car and the lead set on the fourth car derailed as they passed over #73 switch. Two days later, on Saturday, January 25, 2003, eastbound equipment train #8738 derailed four wheels on the lead truck of the first coach car (the second car in the consist) as it too passed over #73 switch. Neither train was carrying passengers at the time it derailed. In both cases, at least one car passed over #73 switch before the derailments occurred. Both derailments caused moderate damage to the track and car equipment. The cause of the derailments was not determined until after the second derailment on January 25, 2003 when the investigation discovered that a newly installed switch point on #73 switch's right hand switch point was not manufactured to the correct specifications . The defective switch point and its companion stock rail were installed one day before the first derailment on January 22, 2003 . INVESTIGATION Accident Scene : The Jay Interlocking is located west of Jamaica Station, in Queens, New York. The station and interlocking is one of the railroads busiest hubs with all trains routed through this interlocking going to the various branch lines . The speed limit throughout the interlocking is 15 mph. The #73 switch is a left hand, straight split switch with a Sampson undercut point. Number 73 switch rests on a 1 .8 percent descending grade sloping towards the station and is on a 4 degree curve to the left. A super- elevation of one inch exists between the rails of the diverging routes. On January 22, 2003, a work order was completed by LIRR Track Department personal which included replacing the right side sections of the #73 switch including the thirty-nine foot-long right hand straight stock rail and a 16'- 6" right hand curved switch point. Accident Descriptions : First Derailment - January 23, 2003 At approximately 6 :51 a.m., train #3800 made up of eight M-3 type coach cars and carrying no passengers, left from track #17 at Penn Station heading to Long Beach Station. The trip prior to Jay Interlocking was normal and uneventful . Train #3800, traveling east at approximately 13 mph, entered Jay Interlocking on main track #4 and was routed by the operator in Jay Tower via #73 switch to Jamaica Station track #6 . As the train approached the station platform, the engineer received a derailment hand signal from a track worker in the interlocking and a simultaneous radio message from the Jay Tower operator to immediately stop the train. The engineer applied the train's emergency brakes in response to the communications received. As the B-end truck of coach car #9252 negotiated the left turnout of #73 switch, the wheel flange of the first south wheel climbed the right hand switch point resulting in the wheel riding up on top of the rail . The wheel traveled across the top of the rail for a distance of approximately two feet, then dropped to the south side of the turnout rail, adjacent to the insulated joint at the south heel block, approximately 12 feet past the switch point. The following set of wheels took the same route as the first wheels to derail. Simultaneously, the left hand side wheels of the B-end truck dropped inside the gauge. The B-end truck of the following coach car #9251 also climbed the right switch point causing the wheel to ride up and across the rail, dropping to the south of the turnout at about the same spot as the first truck to derail. The train traveled approximately 150 feet before stopping causing significant damage to the track, railroad ties, third rail, third rail protection boards, switch mechanisms, and signal wires. Car equipment damage included damage to the two trucks, wheels, and undercar equipment of coach cars #9252 & #9251 . The track and third rail damage caused by the derailment was repaired, and the switch and surrounding track was returned to service at 4:03 p .m. that same day. The Railroad estimated that there were over thirty train movements made safely across the #73 switch from the time the new switch point was installed until the first derailment. The coach cars (#9252 & #9251) involved were taken out of service and sent to a Maintenance Facility for further inspection and repairs . The weather at the time of this incident was partly cloudy and cold, with a temperature around 10 degrees . Based on a review of all track measurements, equipment measurements and operating moves, no conclusive decision as to why the train derailed was determined and the track was returned to service after all repairs were made. Second Derailment - January 25, 2003 At approximately 7:14 p .m., eastbound train #873 8, carrying no passengers, left the Morris Park Yard bound for Speonk Station. The train consist was made up of a duel power locomotive (#401) pulling four C-3 type coach cars. The train was routed through Jay Interlocking over switch #73 in a facing move for Jamaica Station track #5 . The engineer was operating from the locomotive and was traveling at approximately 13 mph as the train approached the station. The engineer stated that after passing over the #73 switch, he felt the train shake violently and he immediately applied the emergency brakes. As the wheels of coach car #4005 passed over the switch, the wheel flange of the B-end truck climbed up onto the right hand switch point, similar to that of the derailment two days earlier. Investigation showed that the wheels dropped off the track adjacent to the #2 switch rod, approximately two feet from the end of the switch point. All four wheels of the B-end truck on coach car #4005 dropped to the ground on the south side of the turnout rails. The derailment caused minimal damage to the B-end truck, wheels, drawbar assembly and undercar equipment of coach car #4005. Track damage was also termed as minor. The equipment was sent to a Maintenance Facility for repair. The #73 switch was immediately taken out of service and an in depth investigation ensued. The weather at the time of both derailments was clear and cold, with the temperature around 30 degrees. Derailment Investigation: The initial investigation after the first derailment on January 23, 2003 did not find a definitive cause for the derailment . Post accident measurements taken by the LIRR Track Department showed that the track gauge through the turnout was within LIRR standards for Class I track. The track profile and alignment leading up to and beyond #73 switch also met with LIRR standards. The Railroad's Track Geometry Car tested the tracks in the interlocking one week prior to the first derailment with no exceptions taken. Since all measurements taken met with LIRR track specifications, and there was nothing which indicated a problem with #73 switch, the investigation shifted from a track related problem to a potential car equipment problem involving the wheels or trucks. The suspected equipment problem was short lived however and, after the second derailment on January 25, 2003, the investigation shifted back to the track and particularly #73 switch. Wheel markings left in grease that was applied to the right hand switch point after the first derailment indicated that the point of derailment was at the switch point. At this time, a decision was made to replace the switch point and stock rail that was only installed just three days earlier on January 22, 2003 . On January 26, 2003, the recently installed 3 9' section of the right hand straight stock rail and the 16' 6" right hand curved switch point of the #73 switch was removed and replaced. A visual inspection of the right hand curved switch point after it was removed showed that the switch point taper appeared to be different from the other switch point being installed. The point taper appeared too thick, instead of the knife edge taper that was normal for this type of switch installation. The excessive thickness of the switch point caused a narrowing of the gauge at the critical point where the wheels deflect past the switch point on to the diverging route. The narrowing ofthe gauge, along with a combination of track geometry, local gradient, and track super-elevation all contributed to allowing wheel climb on the right hand curved switch point at slow speeds. Split Switch Design: A switch point is used to deflect the wheels of a train from the tracks upon which they are riding to the tracks of a diverging route . Switches are designated either right-handed or left handed, as determined by which way the equipment diverges. The switch points are the movable rails of a turnout which actually cause the train's wheels to diverge. To protect the switch point from wheel batter, the companion stock rail is milled away and the switch point is beveled to fit snugly against the milled area of the stock rail. This style of switch point is known as a Sampson undercut. A bend in the stock rail is made on the turnout side at a predetermined distance in front the switch point. This measurement is referred to as the vertex distance .
Recommended publications
  • New York State Public Transportation Safety Board Rail Safety Section Abbreviated Report Case Number: 9531
    NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD RAIL SAFETY SECTION ABBREVIATED REPORT CASE NUMBER: 9531 DATE OF ACCIDENT: October 14, 2007 CARRIER: MTA Long Island Rail Road TYPE OF ACCIDENT: Collision SYNOPSIS: On Sunday, October 14, 2007, at approximately 6:22 p.m., the conductor on board westbound train #8709 operating on the Montauk Branch east of Southampton Station reported to the train’s engineer that he heard a loud banging noise outside the rear end of the first passenger car. The eight car train was made up of six coach cars and two locomotives and was traveling at a speed of approximately 40 mph in an area where the maximum allowable speed is 65 mph. There were approximately 250 passengers on board the train and the train crew consisted of an engineer, a conductor, and an assistant conductor. Approximately eight minutes later, when the train arrived at the next scheduled stop in Southampton, the conductor detrained and visually inspected the outside of the train. The conductor found damage consistent with being struck by an object along the side of four of the six coach cars and an automobile wiring harness hanging from one of the coach cars. At 6:35 p.m., the conductor radioed the Long Island Rail Road Movement Bureau of the damage he discovered. The Movement Bureau ordered the train to continue on to Speonk Station and to hold there for MTA Police and LIRR supervisory personnel to further inspect the train. Passengers on board the train were discharged at Speonk Station at 6:48 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • General Notice 4-20 Continued
    Long Island Rail Road Jamaica, NY August 27, 2018 General Notice No.4-20 Effective 3:29 AM Monday, August 27, 2018 (A) Entire Railroad Timetable Special Instruction 1103-A General Notice replacement pages for Special Instruction 1103-A On Page I-45, Special Instruction 1103-A has been revised as follows: A keying device to interrupt crossing signals has been added at the following location: “Executive Drive, Deer Park. Located on east end of station platform on No. 2 track only.” Employees must discard Special Instructions Pages I-45 and I-46 and replace with Replacement Pages “I-45 and I-46” attached to and part of this General Notice. (B) Entire Railroad Timetable Special Instruction 1103-H General Notice replacement pages for Special Instruction 1103-H On Page I-49, Special Instruction 1103-H has been revised as follows: 11th row information relating to Commack road “Direction” has been changed to Both, under “Location” 1st crossing west of JS Interlocking has been added Employees must discard Special Instructions Pages I-49 and I-50 and replace with Replacement Pages “I-49 and I-50” attached to and part of this General Notice. (C) Entire Railroad Mainline Branch – Wyandanch Passenger Station Renovation of the of north side platform at Wyandanch Passenger Station has been completed. Newly installed westward and eastward 6/8/10 & 12 car markers located on the platform. All westward trains will platform twelve “12” cars. All eastward trains will platform twelve “12” cars. (D) Entire Railroad Timetable Authority – General Notices General Notice 4-5, Paragraph (D) is annulled.
    [Show full text]
  • New York State Public Transportation Safety Board Rail Safety Section Abbreviated Report Case Number: 9600
    NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD RAIL SAFETY SECTION ABBREVIATED REPORT CASE NUMBER: 9600 DATE OF ACCIDENT: December 13, 2007 CARRIER: MTA –Long Island Rail Road TYPE OF ACCIDENT: Grade Crossing ACCIDENT SYNOPSIS: At 2:51 p.m. on Thursday, December 13, 2007, LIRR train #2709 departed Montauk Station. The train, operated by an engineer, conductor, assistant conductor, and ticket collector, consisted of six bi-level coach cars and one locomotive. As the westbound train approached the Gleason Drive grade crossing in East Quogue, New York, the engineer reported seeing a vehicle without its lights on obstructing the tracks. The engineer repeatedly sounded the train’s horn and placed the train’sbrakes in emergency but could not avoid striking the automobile on the crossing. According to police reports, at approximately 4:06 p.m., the driver stated that while traveling northbound on Gleason Drive the vehicle skidded on the slick roadway and slid off the east end of the crossing pad surface becoming stuck. The driver claimed he attempted to free the stuck vehicle for approximately ten minutes but was unsuccessful. When the driver heard the horn of the approaching train, he exited the vehicle and moved a safe distance away. The vehicle was struck and knocked approximately forty feet across the crossing striking the signal case on the southwest side of the crossing and came to rest. The speed of the train at the time of the impact was estimated to be 55 MPH. Damage to rail equipment was minimal and consisted of damage to the brake piping, step ladder, snow plow and brake hoses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long Island Rail Road
    Long Island Rail Road Jamaica, NY September 10, 2018 General Notice No.4-23 Effective 12:01 AM Monday, September 10, 2018 (A) Entire Railroad Timetable Special Instruction 1901-B General Notice replacement pages for Special Instruction 1901-B On Pages I-92 and I-96, Special Instruction 1901-B has been revised as follows: On Pages, I-92 and I-96 under MAIN LINE Kew gardens and Forest Hills, in Sta. Cap. column, “4” has been changed to “6”, in the “6” car column, “H-4” has been changed to “*” and in the 8, 10, 12 car column, “H-4” has been changed to “H-6”. Employees must discard Special Instruction Pages I-91, I-92, I- 95, and I-96 and replace with Replacement Pages “I-91, I-92, I- 95, and I-96” attached to and part of this General Notice. (B) Entire Railroad Timetable Authority – General Notices General Notice 4-21 Paragraph (A1) is annulled General Notice 4-21 Paragraph (A2), 12 switch cross over paragraph – delete “(blocked and spiked normal)” and delete the last two paragraphs in their entirety. General Notice 4-21 Paragraphs (A3), (A4) and (A5) delete “see map on page 12” General Notice 4-21 Paragraph (A6) delete “see map on page 11-13” General Notice 4-21 Paragraphs (A9) and (A10) delete “see map on page 13” General Notice 4-21 Paragraph (C4) delete “6th row containing information related to Giaquinto has been removed.” (C) Entire Railroad Timetable Station Pages Employees must make the following changes in ink: On Page III, Main line Branch, change “FARM 1 R-From Divide” to read “FARM R-From Divide” and change “FARM 2 R-From Divide” to read “PW R-From Divide”.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Recommended Changes to the Executive Budget
    SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO THE EXECUTIVE BUDGET STATE FISCAL YEAR 2018‐19 TABLE OF CONTENTS Financial Plan and Revenue ............................................................................................................... 1 Summary of Recommended Changes by Agency PUBLIC PROTECTION & GENERAL GOVERNMENT .................................................................. 1‐1 EDUCATION, LABOR & FAMILY ASSISTANCE ........................................................................ 30‐1 HEALTH & MENTAL HYGIENE ............................................................................................... 44‐1 TRANSPORTATION, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION ..... 53‐1 JUDICIARY ............................................................................................................................. 70‐1 DEBT SERVICE ....................................................................................................................... 71‐1 FINANCIAL PLAN Financial Plan On an All‐Funds basis, the SFY 2018‐19 Enacted Budget is estimated to total $168.3 billion, for annual growth of 2.8 percent. The Enacted Budget projects State Operating Funds spending of $100.1 billion, which is an increase of $1.94 billion or 2.0 percent over SFY 2017‐18. Total State fund spending (including Special Revenue Funds and Capital Projects) is projected at $112.6 billion for growth of $5.6 billion or 5.3 percent over last year. General Fund spending is projected at $75.5 billion, an 8.3 percent increase over SFY 2017‐18 with
    [Show full text]
  • V. Land Use Strategies (PDF)
    V. LAND USE STRATEGIES WHB\Southampton Master Plan 85 File: report.doc THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK WHB\Southampton Master Plan 86 File: report.doc V. LAND USE STRATEGIES A. Preservation and Smart Growth The construction of single-family homes is one of the primary driving forces generating the current increase in traffic during the peak summer season. The increase in new home construction permitted over a 10% or 23,000 person increase in year round and seasonal residents and guests during the same nine year period. In addition, the construction of over 500 houses per year represents thousands of jobs spread out to construction sites all over the South Fork. The increase in the number of homes built between 1991 and 2000 dramatically increased the number of jobs devoted to single-family home construction and increased the flow of traffic during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. There is some evidence that as the number of houses being constructed fell off following 2000, that increases in A.M. and P.M. weekday peak hour of a traffic flow stabilized and possibly decreased temporarily, while total daily traffic flows continued to rise. As these new single-family homes are occupied, they on average, generate 10 or more daily trips when in use. The residents generate trips to stores, schools, recreation and work activities. Service providers generate trips for fuel oil deliveries, landscaping, sanitation, cleaning services and others. Many of these additional trips occur outside of the weekday A.M. and P.M. peak hours and thus, have contributed to the continuing increase in total daily traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • Finance Committee Meeting January 2017
    Finance Committee Meeting January 2017 Committee Members L. Schwartz, Chair F. Ferrer, Vice Chair D. Jones C. Moerdler J. Molloy M. Pally J. Samuelson P. Trottenberg V. Vanterpool J. Vitiello P. Ward C. Wortendyke N. Zuckerman Finance Committee Meeting 2 Broadway, 20th Floor Board Room New York, NY 10004 Monday, 1/23/2017 12:30 - 1:45 PM ET 1. PUBLIC COMMENTS PERIOD 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – DECEMBER 12, 2016 Finance Committee Minutes Dec 2016 Final - Page 4 3. 2017 COMMITTEE WORK PLAN 2017 Work Plan - Page 12 4. BUDGETS/CAPITAL CYCLE BudgetWatch (Handout) Finance Watch Finance Watch - Page 20 5. MTA HEADQUARTERS & ALL-AGENCY ITEMS Action Items Municipal Finance Disclosure Policies and Procedures - Page 30 Report and Information Items Special Report: Finance Department 2016 Year-End Review Presentation (Available in the Exhibit Book and MTA.Info) MTA Financial Statements 3rd Quarter for the Nine-Months Ended September 2016 (Available in the Exhibit Book and MTA.Info) Procurements MTAHQ Procurement Report - Page 42 MTAHQ Non-Competitive Procurement - Page 44 MTAHQ Competitive Procurements - Page 46 6. METRO-NORTH RAILROAD (No Items) 7. LONG ISLAND RAIL ROAD, and MTA CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION (No Items) 8. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT and MTA BUS OPERATIONS NYCT Procurements - Page 48 9. BRIDGES AND TUNNELS B & T Procurement - Page 50 10. FIRST MUTUAL TRANSPORTATION ASSURANCE COMPANY (No Items) 11. MTA CONSOLIDATED REPORTS Mid-Year Forecast and November Forecast vs. Actual Results - Page 52 Statement of Operations - Page 55 Overtime - Page 64 Subsidy, Interagency Loans and Stabilization Fund Transactions - Page 69 Debt Service - Page 77 Positions - Page 79 Farebox Operating and Recovery Ratios - Page 82 MTA Ridership - Page 83 Fuel Hedge - Page 107 12.
    [Show full text]
  • 91 Montauk Highway Brochure
    28.8 ACRE DEVELOPMENT SITE FOR SALE 91 Montauk Highway East Moriches, NY 11940 Offering Summary Property Overview Sale Price: Price Upon Request Calling All Developers! 28.8 Acres Situated On Montauk Highway In East Moriches, New York. Incredible Opportunity To Take Advantage Of People Lot Size: 28.8 Acres Flocking To Eastern Long Island And To Bring A New Residential Development To The South Shore Of Long Island. This site is made up of 4 Zoning: A1 Residential individual parcels. Situated within minutes of Sunrise Highway, (Route 27) County: Suffolk with easy access to other major throuroghfares. East Moriches is considered a gateway to the Hamptons and has extremely strong A1 Residential/J2 Zoning: Business demographics. DO NOT MISS THIS RARE OPPORTUNITY! Traffic Count: 12,000 Property Highlights 28.8 Acres Total Minutes From Sunrise Highway Ideal Location at The Gateway to the Hamptons For More Information: Michael G. Murphy Dennis Gandley Executive Vice President Licensed Real Estate Salesperson Head of Operations 631.858.2406 631.858.2460 [email protected] [email protected] Click for Agent Profile Click for Agent Profile WWW.ELLIMANCOMMERCIAL.COM 110 WALT WHITMAN ROAD, HUNTINGTON STA., NY 11746. 631.549.7401. © 2021 DOUGLAS ELLIMAN COMMERCIAL, LLC. ALL MATERIAL PRESENTED HEREIN IS INTENDED FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. WHILE THIS INFORMATION IS BELIEVED TO BE CORRECT, IT IS REPRESENTED SUBJECT TO ERRORS, OMISSIONS, CHANGES OR WITHDRAWAL WITHOUT NOTICE. ALL PROPERTY INFORMATION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO SQUARE FOOTAGE, ROOM COUNT, ZONING IN THE LISTING SHOULD BE VERIFIED BY YOUR OWN ATTORNEY, ARCHITECT OR ZONING EXPERT.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B the Existing Transportation System Elements
    Appendix B The Existing Transportation System Elements and Deficiencies B-1 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK B-2 THE EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ELEMENTS 1. Rail Transportation Existing Service and Ridership There are five train stations currently serving the Town of Southampton on the Long Island Rail Road’s Montauk Branch. These stations are located in Speonk, Westhampton, Hampton Bays, Southampton and Bridgehampton1. The train station stops at Quogue and Southampton College were discontinued in 1996 by the LIRR reportedly due to low ridership. Water Mill was previously closed. The entire Long Island Rail Road Service Map is shown in Figure B-1. Service on the Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) is summarized in Table B-1 and B-2. The additional summer service includes extra trains added primarily on Friday afternoons and evening in the eastbound direction and on Sundays and holidays in the westbound direction. Leave Penn Speonk Westhampto Hampton Southampton Bridgehampto Montauk Station n Bays n Weekday 12:35 A.M. 2:47 A.M. 2:53 A.M. 3:03 A.M. 3:13 A.M. 3:21 A.M. 3:58 A.M. 7:49 A.M. 9:44 A.M. 9:50 A.M. 10:00 A.M. 10:10 A.M. 11:18 A.M. 11:53 A.M. 11:04 A.M. 1:15 P.M. 1:21 P.M. 1:31 P.M. 1:41 P.M. 1:49 P.M. 1:59 P.M. 1:54 P.M. – -- 3:41 P.M. 3:50 P.M. 4:02 P.M. 4:10 P.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Finance Committee Meeting
    Finance Committee Meeting April 2018 Committee Members L. Schwartz, Chair F. Ferrer, Vice Chair N. Brown* I. Greenberg* D. Jones C. Moerdler J. Molloy M. Pally S. Rechler P. Trottenberg V. Vanterpool J. Vitiello P. Ward C. Weisbrod C. Wortendyke N. Zuckerman Finance Committee Meeting 2 Broadway, 20th Floor Board Room New York, NY 10004 Monday, 4/23/2018 12:15 - 1:30 PM ET 1. PUBLIC COMMENTS PERIOD 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – MARCH 19, 2018 Finance Committee Minutes - Page 4 3. 2018 COMMITTEE WORK PLAN 2018 Work Plan - Page 10 4. BUDGETS/CAPITAL CYCLE BudgetWatch (Handout) Finance Watch Finance Watch - Page 18 5. MTA HEADQUARTERS & ALL-AGENCY ITEMS Action Item MTA 2017 Annual Investment Report (Full Report Available in the Exhibit Book and MTA.Info) - Page 28 Report and Information Items Annual Report of Variable Rate Debt Presentation (Exhibit Book & MTA.Info) DRAFT MTA Financial Statements Fiscal Year-End Twelve-Months Ended December 2017 (Exhibit Book & MTA.Info) Procurements MTAHQ Procurement Report - Page 30 MTAHQ Competitive Procurements - Page 32 MTAHQ Ratifications - Page 37 6. METRO-NORTH RAILROAD & LONG ISLAND RAIL ROAD LIRR Procurement - Page 45 7. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT, and MTA BUS OPERATIONS NYCT Procurements - Page 47 8. BRIDGES AND TUNNELS B&T Procurements - Page 49 9. FIRST MUTUAL TRANSPORTATION ASSURANCE COMPANY Capital Market Based Re Insurance - Page 53 10. MTA CONSOLIDATED REPORTS Statement of Operations - Page 57 Overtime - Page 63 Subsidy, Interagency Loans and Stabilization Fund Transactions - Page 68 Debt Service - Page 77 Positions - Page 79 Farebox Operating and Recovery Ratios - Page 82 MTA Ridership - Page 83 Fuel Hedge Program - Page 107 11.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long Island Rail Road
    Long Island Rail Road Jamaica, NY September 4, 2018 General Notice No. 4-21 General Notice 4-21 contains information related to and supersedes General Notices 4-1 through 4-20. General Notices 4-1 through 4-20 are to be discarded. Effective 12:01 AM Tuesday, September 4, 2018 (A1) Entire Railroad Physical Characteristics – Farm Interlocking No 2 track Between Farm 1 and Farm 2 Int. has been converted to a stub ended track with a barricade erected 2280 feet east of SB 2 Farm 1 Int. This stub ended track accommodates 25 cars and is accessible only from the west end of Farm 1 Int. No. 2 track to be reconfigured as part of the double track project. Pinelawn Long Siding has been converted to a stub ended track with a barricade erected 180 feet west of the second facing point hand thrown switch west of long siding electric lock (hand thrown switch toward JD Posillico Materials siding). This stub ended track is accessible only from the east end via the long siding electric lock. Pinelawn long siding to be reconfigured as part of the double track project. 2E signal (Farm 2 westerly limit). out of service to be removed. 3W signal (Farm 2 easterly limit). out of service to be removed. All Dual Control switches in Farm 2 Int. out of service and removed. (21 and 13 switches). See Map on Page 10. (A2) Entire Railroad Physical Characteristics – JS Interlocking Reconfigured JS Interlocking R-Divide in service and relocated as follows: 1841 feet west from the west end of Deer Park Psgr.
    [Show full text]
  • East End Transportation Study Final Report September 17, 2009
    East End Transportation Study Final Report September 17, 2009 U.S. Department of Transportation Research and Innovative Technology Administration John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center This report was prepared with funds provided by the New York Department of State under the Shared Municipal Services Grant Program. Notes This document has been prepared by the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center on behalf of the Towns of East Hampton, Riverhead, Shelter Island, Southampton, and Southold. Funding was provided through a New York Department of State Shared Municipal Services Incentive Grant for a study of the “Creation of a Coordinated Rail & Bus Network on Eastern Long Island.” The Town of Southampton acted as lead municipality for grant administration and project management purposes. Contents Notes __________________________________________________________ ii Contents ________________________________________________________1 Executive Summary______________________________________________3 1. Introduction___________________________________________________8 Background ________________________________________________________ 8 Structure of this Report _____________________________________________ 9 2. Operational Issues ___________________________________________11 New Service Concept_______________________________________________ 11 Track Conflicts with High-Volume LIRR Service ______________________ 17 3. Institutional and Financial Options ____________________________19 Current Arrangements______________________________________________
    [Show full text]