2005 California Problem Gambling Situational Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2005 California Problem Gambling Situational Assessment SITUATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF PROBLEM GAMBLING SERVICES IN CALIFORNIA This assessment was developed under contract by the California Council on Problem Gambling on behalf of the Office of Problem Gambling, Program Services Division, California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs Contract #03-00227 Primary Authors: Rachel A. Volberg Lori Rugle Richard J. Rosenthal Tim Fong March 2005 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project was developed under contract by the California Council on Problem Gambling (CCPG). The authors gratefully acknowledge the substantial efforts of the staff, members and directors of CCPG who administered the contract and prepared summaries of the various activities in which the Council has engaged to assist problem gamblers and their families over the past five years. We also greatly appreciate the work done by Bensinger DuPont & Associates to carry out a substantial Email and telephone survey to help assess the extent and quality of problem gambling services in California. This project was commissioned and funded by the Office of Problem Gambling, California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs. Finally, we thank all of the individuals who took the time to respond to our questions and surveys and provide information about services for problem gamblers in California. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs, the Office of Problem Gambling or the Office of the Governor of California. Suggested Citation: Volberg, R.A., Rugle, L., Rosenthal, R.J. & Fong, T. (2004). Situational Assessment of Problem Gambling Services in California. Sacramento, CA: Office of Problem Gambling, California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. i 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Defining the Terms .........................................................................................................2 1.2. The Importance of Strategic Planning ............................................................................ 3 1.3. Purpose of Situational Assessments................................................................................ 4 1.4. Best Practices vs. Current Practices................................................................................ 5 1.5. A Brief History of Legal Gambling................................................................................ 5 1.6. Overview of Report....................................................................................................... 10 2. METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................... 11 2.1. Literature Reviews........................................................................................................ 11 2.2. Assessing Services for Problem Gamblers in California.............................................. 12 3. CURRENT PRACTICES IN PROBLEM GAMBLING SERVICES.................................. 15 3.1. The Prevalence of Gambling Problems in the Community .......................................... 15 3.2. Risk Factors for Problem Gambling ............................................................................. 21 3.3. Regulation and Policy as Prevention Strategies............................................................ 30 3.4. Funding and Organization of Problem Gambling Services .......................................... 36 3.5. Public Education and Awareness Campaigns............................................................... 38 3.6. Training Programs for Professionals and Industry ....................................................... 47 3.7. Helplines ....................................................................................................................... 53 3.8. Treatment ...................................................................................................................... 55 4. CURRENT PRACTICES IN PROBLEM GAMBLING SERVICES IN CALIFORNIA ... 69 4.1. Regulation and Policy as Prevention Strategies............................................................ 69 4.2. Prevalence Research in California................................................................................ 69 4.3. The California Surveys ................................................................................................. 71 4.4. Public Awareness and Education Activities ................................................................. 78 4.5. Training Programs for Professionals and Industry ....................................................... 83 4.6. Helplines ....................................................................................................................... 87 4.7. Treatment: Coverage of Costs ...................................................................................... 90 4.8. Research and Evaluation............................................................................................... 92 5. CONCLUSION..................................................................................................................... 93 5.1. Limitations of Report.................................................................................................... 93 5.2. General Conclusions ..................................................................................................... 94 6. REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................... 98 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Telephone Survey Sample Characteristics ..................................................................... 13 Table 2: Spending on Problem Gambling Services, 2004 ............................................................ 37 Table 3: Spending on Problem Gambling Services in the U.S..................................................... 37 Table 4: Calls Received by the NCPG Helpline........................................................................... 53 Table 5: Criteria for Three National Gambling Counselor Certifications .................................... 61 Table 6: Comparing Problem Gambling Prevalence Rates .......................................................... 70 Table 7: Comparing Non-Problem Gamblers and Problem Gamblers in California.................... 71 Table 8: Survey Respondents and Topic Areas ............................................................................ 72 Table 9: Problem Gambling Awareness & Education.................................................................. 73 Table 10: Attended Problem Gambling Training in Last 5 Years................................................ 75 Table 11: Law Enforcement Referrals.......................................................................................... 76 Table 12: Problem Gamblers Receiving Treatment in California, Past Year............................... 77 Table 13: Characteristics of Callers with Problem, 2003 ............................................................. 88 Table 14: Primary Gambling Preference Among CCPG Callers with Problem........................... 89 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction The purpose of this report is to assist the Office of Problem Gambling in implementing the provisions of Assembly Bill 673 (Chapter 210, 2003 Statutes) which authorized the establishment of problem gambling services in California. The report identifies the current status of problem gambling research, programs and services in California and internationally and is the first step in California’s problem gambling strategic planning. Throughout this report, the term problem gambling is used to refer to the entire spectrum of gambling-related difficulties that individuals experience. At its most severe end, this continuum includes pathological gambling, a recognized psychiatric disorder. The gambling industry in California has grown exponentially over the last twenty years, with revenues rising five-fold since 1997, from $2.5 billion to an estimated $13 billion in 2003. For most people, gambling is an occasional and enjoyable experience. For some people, however, gambling leads to debilitating problems that can also result in harm to people close to them and to the wider community. Some forms of gambling, most notably those that are continuous in nature and involve an element of skill or perceived skill, have a particularly strong association with problem gambling. While it is generally estimated that between 2 percent and 5 percent of the adult population are problem or pathological gamblers in jurisdictions with ‘mature’ gambling markets, prevalence rates among regular gamblers can be as high as 25 percent. Although legal gambling is well-established in California and promises continued rapid growth, little is known about Californians who experience problems related to their gambling or what measures would most effectively minimize or mitigate their problems. The most promising way of preventing and mitigating problem gambling is through a public health approach that encompasses a broad range of activities. The range of activities can be grouped into six major areas: 1. Identifying and maintaining key indicator data which will serve to monitor regular gambling behavior and problem gambling. 2. Strategic planning/coordination
Recommended publications
  • Hearing Transcript
    R O U G H D R A F T Senate Committee on Governmental Organization Roderick D. Wright, Chair Examining the Public Policy and Fiscal Implications Related to the Authorization of Intrastate Internet Poker in California Tuesday, February 9, 2010 State Capitol, Room 4203 SENATOR RODERICK D. WRIGHT: ...with our informational hearing. I’ll be the referee. I want everybody to obey my commands at all times. There will be no saving by the bell, except after Round 10. After Round 10, you will be able to be saved by the bell. No rabbit punches. And again, obey my commands at all times. (Pause) Okay. I’m going to give a couple more minutes for our members to get here. At this morning’s presentation, the part of Steve Rittvo will be played by—Mr. Rittvo got stuck in snow in Washington, D.C., so he will not be here this morning. Again, as you can see from the agenda, we have kind of an ambitious agenda, but I think it’s necessary for the scope of what we’re trying to do. We’re going to schedule to try to have approximately a 30-minute break, and we hope we can wrap up by about 4 o’clock. Now given the nature of what we’re doing, we’re going to set up a little pool as to what time we get out. (Laughter) You know, depending on who wins the pool, maybe we can give the money to somebody’s charity. But you can’t filibuster in order to extend the time if you bet on one side or the other.
    [Show full text]
  • 31 March 2015 1
    GAMBLING PREVALENCE OF THE RECIPIENTS OF OLD AGE SOCIAL GRANT FROM THE EASTERN CAPE PROVINCE 31 March 2015 1 RESEARCH REPORT ON GAMBLING PREVALENCE OF THE RECIPIENTS OF OLD AGE SOCIAL GRANT FROM THE EASTERN CAPE PROVINCE Prepared for: By Solid Uloyiso Joint Venture (JV) This research project was conducted under the leadership and guidance of the Eastern Cape Gambling and Betting Board (ECGBB) and its partners, i.e. South African Social Security Agency (SASSA) and Eastern Cape Department of Social Development (ECDSD). ECGBB as the leading entity was represented by: Mr. Luvuyo Tshoko Head: Strategic Management Services Mrs. Pumeza George Communication, Marketing and Research Specialist Solid Uloyiso JV team: Mrs. Nomhle Gwanya Research Project Co-ordinator Mrs. Zoliswa Benya Research Specialist Dr. Noncedo Khewu (PhD) Educationist, Ethicist and Researcher Specialised Services and Acknowledgements Specialised Services: Prof. Emmanuel Olusola Adu (PhD) Data Analyst Mrs. Nothemba Ndawo Educationist and Social Facilitator Mr. Litha Mpiyakhe Graphic Designer Prof. N Duku (PhD) Validator Mr. B. Carlson Editor 1 Acknowledgements South African Social Security Agency Eastern Cape Department of Social Development Gambling sector Licensees: Casinos, Bingos, Tabs, V slots, Pioneer Slots offices Older Persons Forums Youth Groups Community Leaders Community Based Organisations (CBO’s) Faith Based Organisations (FBO’s) Institutions of Higher Learning Gambling Participants Data Collectors 2 CONTENTS PAGE Pages Research report on gambling prevalence of the
    [Show full text]
  • Wake Forest Journal of Business and Intellectual Property Law
    WAKE FOREST JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW ! VOLUME!14! WINTER!2014! NUMBER!2! THE TECHNOLOGICAL AND BUSINESS EVOLUTION OF MACHINE-BASED GAMBLING IN AMERICA Darren A. Prum† and Carlin McCrory† I. INTRODUCTION. ............................................................. 237! II. HISTORICAL ROOTS OF GAMBLING IN THE UNITED STATES ............................................................................. 239! A.!THE THREE WAVES OF GAMBLING ........................... 240! B.!GAMBLING ON NATIVE AMERICAN RESERVATIONS . 250! III. MACHINE-BASED GAMING ........................................ 254! A.!SLOT MACHINES ........................................................ 254! B.!PLAYERS’ POOLS, BINGO MACHINES, AND VIDEO LOTTERY TERMINALS ................................................. 260! 1.!Players’ Pools .......................................................... 260! 2.!Class II Machines .................................................... 261! 3.!Video Lottery Terminals .......................................... 264! IV. APPROACHES TO THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF GAMING ........................................................................... 265! A.!CASINO GAMING ........................................................ 266! B.!NATIVE AMERICAN GAMING ..................................... 267! C.!RACINOS .................................................................... 270! V. LEGAL ISSUES AND ANALYSIS .................................... 271! A.!DECEIT ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Impact of Gambling in South Africa
    THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF GAMBLING IN SOUTH AFRICA A quantitative perspective 2013 © 2013 National Gambling Board Page 1 SOCIAL IMPACT OF GAMBLING IN SOUTH AFRICA A quantitative perspective Study commissioned by the National Gambling Board 2013 © National Gambling Board, 2013 Page 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The following people and institutions are acknowledged for their inputs during the various phases of the research project: Members of the Research & Ethics Committee (NGB) for their feedback and guidance in terms of the finalisation of the report; Executive and top management of the board for their guidance and leadership in terms of the scope and objectives of the research project; IPSOS/Markinor who was responsible for fieldwork, collection and processing of data (IPSOS Khayabus, wave 2 of 2012); and Ms Anneke Greyling (Sentinel Research and Strategy Consulting) who assisted in the finalisation of the questionnaire, analysis, compilation of this report and presentation of findings to the board, as well as the professional way and dedication in which this project was executed. EXCLUSION OF CLAIMS Despite all efforts to ensure accuracy in the assembly of information and data or the compilation thereof, the National Gambling Board is unable to warrant the accuracy of the information, data and compilations as contained in this report. Readers are deemed to have waived and renounced all rights to any claim against the abovementioned institutions and their officers for any loss or damage of any nature whatsoever arising from the use or reliance upon such information, data or compilations. © 2013 National Gambling Board Page i FOREWORD Chairperson of the National Gambling Board Prof Linda de Vries Conducting regular research to determine the socio-economic impact of gambling in South Africa is one of the mandatory functions of the National Gambling Board (NGB).
    [Show full text]
  • Flynt V. Harris Complaint 11.30.2016.Pdf
    Case 2:16-cv-02831-JAM-EFB Document 1 Filed 11/30/16 Page 1 of 25 1 PAUL J. CAMBRIA, JR. (State Bar No. 177957) ERIN E. MCCAMPBELL 2 [email protected] [email protected] 3 LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP 4 1631 West Beverly Blvd., Second Floor Los Angeles, CA 90026 5 Telephone: (323) 883-1807 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7 Larry C. Flynt, Haig Kelegian, Sr., 8 and Haig T. Kelegian, Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO BRANCH 10 LARRY C. FLYNT, HAIG KELEGIAN, SR., 11 and HAIG T. KELEGIAN, JR., 12 Plaintiffs, vs. CIVIL CASE NO. 13 14 KAMALA D. HARRIS, in her official capacity as ATTORNEY GENERAL of the STATE of 15 CALIFORNIA, WAYNE QUINT, JR., in his official capacity as the CHIEF of the 16 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT of JUSTICE, BUREAU of GAMBLING CONTROL, an COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY 17 agency of the STATE of CALIFORNIA, and AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF JIM EVANS, TIFFANY E. CONKLIN, 18 ROGER DUNSTAN, LAUREN HAMMOND, 19 and TRANG TO, in their official capacities as members of the CALIFORNIA GAMBLING 20 CONTROL COMMISSION, an agency of the STATE of CALIFORNIA, 21 Defendants. 22 23 24 25 Plaintiffs Larry C. Flynt, Haig Kelegian, Sr., and Haig T. Kelegian, Jr. 26 27 (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), by their undersigned attorneys, bring the instant civil 28 action for declaratory and injunctive relief, and allege as follows: -1- COMPLAINT Case 2:16-cv-02831-JAM-EFB Document 1 Filed 11/30/16 Page 2 of 25 1 INTRODUCTION 2 1. This is a civil action wherein Plaintiffs pray for a declaratory judgment and a 3 permanent injunction to restrain and enjoin the named Defendants, as well as their 4 5 agents, employees, and representatives, from acting under color of state law to 6 deprive Plaintiffs of their rights, privileges, and immunities secured to them by the 7 8 United States Constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • V. List of References
    LIST OF REFERENCES General Gambling Information Abt, V., Smith, J., and Christiansen, E. The Business of International Gaming Institute, University of Nevada, Las Risk: Commercial Gambling in Mainstream America. Vegas. The Gaming Industry: Introduction and Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas (1985). Perspectives. New York: John Wiley & Sons (1996). Minnesota Planning. Minnesota Gambling 1993. St. Paul, Blakey, G. and Kurland, H. Development of the Federal MN: Minnesota Planning (May 1993). Law of Gambling. Cornell Law Review, 63:923 (1978). Kusyszyn, Igor. “The Psychology of Gambling,” Annals of Brenner, R. and Brenner, G. Gambling and Speculation: A the American Academy of Political and Social Science Theory, a History and a Future of Some Human Decisions. 474:133-145 (July 1984). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press (1990). Public Agenda. Gambling: Is it a Problem? What Should Christiansen, E. The United States Gross Annual Wager. We Do? An Issue Book for National Issues Forums. International Gaming & Wagering Business. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company (1998) Cozic, C. and Winters, P. (eds.) Gambling. San Diego, Rose, I. Gambling and the Law. Los Angeles: Gambling CA: Greenhaven Press (1995). Times (1986). Davis, Bertha. Gambling in America: A Growth Industry. Rose, I. The Impact of American Laws on Foreign Legal An Impact Book. New York: Franklin Watts (1992). Gambling, New York Law School Journal of International and Comparative Law, 8(1):129-166 (1986). Detlefsen, Robert R. Wagers of Sin. Reason, pp. 24-30 (December 1997). Rose, I. The Rise and Fall of the Third Wave: Gambling Will Be Outlawed in Forty Years. In Eadington (ed.) Detlefsen, Robert R.
    [Show full text]
  • Allow New Types of Gambling in California. Initiative Constitutional Amendment
    University of California, Hastings College of the Law UC Hastings Scholarship Repository Initiatives California Ballot Propositions and Initiatives 8-6-2018 Allow New Types of Gambling in California. Initiative Constitutional Amendment. Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ca_ballot_inits Recommended Citation Allow New Types of Gambling in California. Initiative Constitutional Amendment. California Initiative 1854 (2018). https://repository.uchastings.edu/ca_ballot_inits/2131 This Initiative is brought to you for free and open access by the California Ballot Propositions and Initiatives at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Initiatives by an authorized administrator of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. August 16, 2018 Initiative 18-0003 (Amdt. #1) The Attorney General of California has prepared the following title and summary of the chief purpose and points of the proposed measure: ALLOWS NEW TYPES OF GAMBLING IN CALIFORNIA. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Allows federally recognized Native American tribes to operate roulette and craps games on tribal lands, subject to compacts negotiated by the Governor and ratified by the Legislature. Allows licensed gambling establishments, such as card rooms, to conduct on-site sports wagering and to operate Nevada-style card games, and may result in authorization of sports wagering on tribal lands because of federal law. Prohibits Governor from approving gaming on newly acquired off-reservation tribal lands and negotiating gaming compacts with non-federally recognized tribes. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: Unclear net fiscal impact, as it would depend primarily on how the measure is interpreted and implemented as well as the extent to which businesses and members of the public participate in the new gaming activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Extent and Nature of Internet Gambling in Gauteng
    MEASURING THE EXTENT AND NATURE OF INTERNET GAMBLING IN GAUTENG Report prepared for the Gauteng Gambling Board and the National Responsible Gambling Programme 2014 Prepared by: Dr L Scott, UCT Prof GDI Barr, UCT GGB & NRGP Project prepared for GGB – Dr LD Scott & Prof GDI Barr - October 2013 GGB & NRGP Project prepared for GGB – Dr LD Scott & Prof GDI Barr - October 2013 Ethical Clearance: All human studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in this study. TABLE OF CONTENTS Project Title: Measuring the Extent and Nature of Internet Gambling in Gauteng Table of Contents ..............................................................................................................................................1 List of Tables .....................................................................................................................................................2 List of Figures ...................................................................................................................................................3 Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................................................4 Background .....................................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • THE PROPOSED NEW GAMBLING TAX in SOUTH AFRICA By
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by South East Academic Libraries System (SEALS) THE PROPOSED NEW GAMBLING TAX IN SOUTH AFRICA by JUSTIN ESROM ROBERTS Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MAGISTER COMMERCII (TAXATION) in the FACULTY OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC SCIENCES at NELSON MANDELA METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY SUPERVISOR: PROFESSOR AJN BRETTENNY CO-SUPERVISOR: MR D JOUBERT Table of Contents Table of contents i Declaration ii Summary iii Chapter I Introduction and research goals 1 Chapter II Withholding tax 7 Chapter III Gambling in South Africa 12 Chapter IV Foreign jurisdictions policy on withholding taxes on gambling 29 Chapter V Potential short-comings of the proposed gambling tax 38 Chapter VI Conclusion 52 References 59 i Declaration This project is an original piece of work which is made available for photocopying, and for inter-library loan. Signed ................................................................... Date ................................................................... ii Summary In the 2011/2012 Budget Speech delivered by the Minister of Finance, Pravin Gordhan, it was announced that a 15% withholding tax on gambling winnings above R 25 000 was to be introduced with effect from 1 April 2012. This treatise was undertaken to critically analyse the different elements of the proposed new withholding tax. It was established that the fiscus already benefits significantly from the gambling industry and levies and taxes from the gambling industry dwarf the revenue SARS collect from other forms of taxes such as Donations tax and Estate Duty tax. The necessity, therefore, of taxing gambling winnings in the hands of the individual is debatable. A comparison with the three foreign countries used by the Minister as an example of countries who have successfully implemented a withholding tax on gambling winnings exposed operational or other characteristics which bear no significant relationship to the situation in which the industry operates in South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LEGALITY of BANNING ONLINE GAMBLING in SOUTH AFRICA: IS ONLINE GAMBLING NOT a COMPONENT of GAMBLING? Segoane Lawrence Monnye*
    THE LEGALITY OF BANNING ONLINE GAMBLING IN SOUTH AFRICA: IS ONLINE GAMBLING NOT A COMPONENT OF GAMBLING? Segoane Lawrence Monnye* I. INTRODUCTION Gambling has undergone a metamorphosis from being immoral, to becom- ing amoral,1 and from being a leisure activity, to becoming an income-generat- ing recreational activity. In South Africa, the regulation of gambling is no longer based on morality, but on a set of principles ranging from income-gener- ation through taxes, job creation, and economic empowerment2, as well as pro- motion of tourism and other recreational activities.3 That legalization of gambling has become, and still is, motivated by its revenue-generating capabil- ity is evident from the amounts exchanging hands in this industry. In the fiscal year 2009-2010, the total amount of money wagered in South Africa-including money wagered from winnings-amounted to almost US $375 million (an equivalent of 2.8 billion ZAR).4 In the European Union the annual revenues generated in 2008 by the gambling service sector, measured on the basis of * Senior Lecturer of Law, University of South Africa and Attorney of the High Court of South Africa. LLB (University of Limpopo), LLM (University of Witwatersrand) & LLM (University of Wisconsin-Madison). I wish to thank Professor Dana van der Merwe for his insightful comments and the editors of UNLV Gaming Law Journal for their intelligent edit of this work. 1 See I. Nelson Rose, Gambling and the Law: The International Law of Remote Wagering, 40 J. MARSHALL L. REV. 1159, 1160 (2006) (a US professor in trademark regards gambling as a morally suspect industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Voter Information Guide for 2000, Primary
    University of California, Hastings College of the Law UC Hastings Scholarship Repository Propositions California Ballot Propositions and Initiatives 2000 Voter Information Guide for 2000, Primary Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.uchastings.edu/ca_ballot_props Recommended Citation Voter Information Guide for 2000, Primary (2000). http://repository.uchastings.edu/ca_ballot_props/1188 This Proposition is brought to you for free and open access by the California Ballot Propositions and Initiatives at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Propositions by an authorized administrator of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BALPAM COVER NO PROPOSITION 24 FILE CONTENTS Pages Introduction Legislative Constitutional Amendment Prop. 1A Gambling on Tribal Lands. .......................................................................... 4 – 7 Bond Acts Prop. 12 Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000. (The Villaraigosa-Keeley Act). ................. 8 – 11 Prop. 13 Safe Drinking Water, Clean Water, Watershed Protection, and Flood Protection Bond Act. ................................................................................. 12 – 15 Prop. 14 California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2000. .................................... 16 – 19 Prop. 15 The Hertzberg-Polanco Crime Laboratories Construction Bond Act of 1999...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Toward Consumer Protection in the Gambling Industry Kurt Eggert
    Maryland Law Review Volume 63 | Issue 2 Article 3 Truth in Gaming: Toward Consumer Protection in the Gambling Industry Kurt Eggert Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr Part of the Consumer Protection Law Commons, and the Gaming Commons Recommended Citation Kurt Eggert, Truth in Gaming: Toward Consumer Protection in the Gambling Industry, 63 Md. L. Rev. 217 (2004) Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr/vol63/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Academic Journals at DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maryland Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MARYLAND LAW REVIEW VOLUME 63 2004 NUMBER 2 © Copyright Maryland Law Review, Inc. 2004 Articles TRUTH IN GAMING: TOWARD CONSUMER PROTECTION IN THE GAMBLING INDUSTRY KURT EGGERT* I. INTRODUCTION ............................................. 218 II. THE RAPID EXPANSION OF LEGAL GAMBLING IN THE UNITED STATES ............................................ 221 III. THE SCOPE OF PROBLEM GAMBLING ....................... 224 IV. CALCULATING THE AVERAGE PRICE OF A WAGER .......... 232 V. THE ABSENCE OF EFFECTIVE PRICE DISCLOSURE FOR SLOT MACHINES ................................................. 235 VI. MANY GAMBLERS, INCLUDING PROBLEM AND PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLERS, WOULD LIKELY USE AND BENEFIT FROM GAMBLING PRICE INFORMATION IF IT WERE PROVIDED EFFECTIVELY .................................... 244 A. Informational Regulation of Gambling.................. 245 B. The Command and Control Approach to the Regulation of Gam bling............................................ 246 C. The Laissez-FaireApproach to the Regulation of Gam bling............................................ 248 * © Kurt Eggert, 2004. Associate Professor of Law, Chapman University School of Law. J.D., University of Califor- nia-Berkeley (Boalt Hall).
    [Show full text]