DOCSLIB.ORG

Mire Ecosystems in Northern Europe: Diversity, Dynamics, Carbon Balance, Resources and Conservation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mire Ecosystems in Northern Europe: Diversity, Dynamics, Carbon Balance, Resources and Conservation Institute of Biology RAS Karelian Research Centre Branch of Biological Sciences Russian Academy of Sciences Finnish Environment Institute Mire Ecosystems in Northern Europe: Diversity, Dynamics, Carbon Balance, Resources and Conservation Proceedings of International Symposium (Petrozavodsk: August 30 – September 2, 2005) Petrozavodsk, 2006 Институт биологии Карельского научного центра РАН Отделение Биологических Наук Российской академии наук Институт окружающей среды Финляндии Болотные экосистемы севера Европы: разнообразие, динамика, углеродный баланс, ресурсы и охрана Материалы международного симпозиума (Петрозаводск, 30 августа – 2 сентября 2005 г.) Петрозаводск, 2006 УДК [581.526:551.481.2]574.4/5(48) Болотные экосистемы севера Европы: разнообразие, динамика, углеродный баланс, ресурсы и охрана: Материалы международного симпозиума (Петрозаводск, 30 августа – 2 сентября 2005 г.). Петрозаводск: Карельский научный центр РАН, 2006. – 396 с. В сборнике материалов международного симпозиума «Болотные экосистемы севера Европы: разнообразие, динамика, углеродный баланс, ресурсы и охрана» приведены результаты научных исследований российских и зарубежных специалистов в области изучения болотных экосистем северных регионов Европы. Приведены данные многолетних исследований флоры и растительности болот, динамики болотных экосистем, материальных биоресурсов, углеродного баланса. Освещены современные проблемы охраны болот. ISBN 5-9274-0216-X © Институт биологии КарНЦ РАН, 2006 СОДЕРЖАНИЕ Предисловие …………………………………………………………………… 9 Г. А. Елина, О. Л. Кузнецов. История и современное состояние исследований болот Карелии (55 лет лаборатории болотных экосистем)….. 11 В. К. Антипин. Болота биосферного национального парка «Водлозерский» и их природоохранное значение……………………………………………….. 35 Н. А. Березина, Е. М. Воронцова. Древовидные формы можжевельника (Juniperus communis L.) на торфяных болотах национального парка "Рус- ский север" (Вологодская область)…………………………………..………… 42 С. Э. Вомперский, А. Г. Ковалев, Т. В. Глухова, М. В. Смагина, А. Е. Ерофеев, М. Ю. Зазнобин. О методике оценки современного прироста торфа болот. ………………………………………………………….. 48 О. В. Галанина. Опыт использования двух основных клас-сификационных подходов для крупно-масштабного картографирования растительности болот………………………………………………….…….…………………….. 60 С. И. Грабовик. Постмелиоративная динамика структуры и биологиче- ской продуктивности мезотрофных травяно-сфагновых болот южной Карелии………………………………………………….……………………….. 73 В. П. Денисенков, Г. М. Чернова. Болота северо-западного приладожья и их динамика (на примере Ладожской учебно-географической базы СПБГУ)……………………………………………………………………..……. 83 Т. Ю. Дьячкова. Мониторинг состояния популяций редких видов расте- ний болот……………………………………………………………….…. 91 Т. Г. Ивченко. Флористический состав, структура и особенности распре- деления растительных сообществ болот низкогорной части южного Урала (на примере Ильменского заповедника)………………………….……………. 99 Е. В. Кармазина. Бриофлора болот национального парка «Русский Север» (Вологодская область) ……………………………………………..……….…... 111 В. А. Коломыцев. Потенциал заболачивания таежных ландшафтов Карелии……………………………………………………………………..……. 121 А. В. Кравченко. Флора болот природного парка «Кожозерский» (Архан- гельская бласть)……………………..………………..…………………………. 129 О. Л. Кузнецов. Флора и растительность болот Карелии…………..……….. 145 С. А. Кутенков. Растительность болотных лесов среднетаежной подзоны Карелии………………………………………………………………………….. 159 О. А. Маракаев, В. В. Горохова..Охрана генофонда орхидных на болотах Ярославской области…………………………………………………………… 172 В. Ю. Нешатаева, В. Ю. Нешатаев. Растительность болот–плащей Западной Камчатки и Северной Европы: сравнительный анализ……….…... 181 И. М. Нестеренко. Влияние мелиорации болотных почв на режим грунто- вых и поверхностных вод………………………………………………………. 193 5 С. М. Новиков. Гидролого–экологические аспекты проблемы хозяйствен- ного освоения болот…………………………………………………..………… 196 В. В. Панов. Стркутурно-динамические особенности развития микрорель- ефа моховых болот……………………………………………………………… 210 В. И. Саковец. Лесоводственная эффективность и биосферная роль осу- шенных лесоболотных экосистем в условиях Карелии……….……………… 226 В. А. Смагин. Евтрофные болота таежной зоны европейской части России: типология и растительный покров………….………………….…….. 231 П. Н. Токарев. Разработка методики дешифровки на космоснимках основ- ных типов болотных участков Карелии по материалам наземных и дистан- ционных исследований……………………………………………….………… 243 М. А. Фадеева. К флоре лишайников болот и заболоченных лесов Карель- ского берега Белого моря……………………………………………………….. 248 Д. А. Филиппов. Ресурсы болотных экосистем Вологодской области и их охрана………………………………………………………………………..…… 255 Ю. Л. Шиляева. Предварительные итоги изучения верховых и переход- ных болот в Удмуртской Республике………………………………….………. 267 Т. К. Юрковская. Широтная дифференциация болот в пределах меридио- нальных секторов на западе России………………………………..………….. 271 P. Hanhela & S. Eurola .The ecological criteria of the vascular mire flora of the mire conservation areas in the southern and middle part of Finland……….. 279 R. Heikkilä, O. Kuznetsov, T. Lindholm, M. Mäkilä & A. Maksimov. Bio- diversity and Holocene development of Ypäyssuo mire system (north of the Republic of Karelia)……………………………………………………………… 282 J. Laitinen, A. Huttunen, R. Sakari, S. Rehel & T. Lindholm. Towards a Finnish typology for classifying boreal mire complexes and systems: a morphological approach………………………………………………………… 296 T. Lindholm, R. Heikkilä. The mire protection process in Finland during the 20 th century…………………………………………………………….………… 304 T. Lindholm, E. Kaakinen & A. Kokko. Threatened mire habitats in Finland. .. 313 M. Mäkilä. Peat increment in Finland………………………………………...…. 321 A. Moen. Regional variation and protection of mires in Norway………………... 328 R. Ruuhijärvi & T. Lindholm. The Finnish mire site type classification system…………………………………………………………………………….. 338 T. Sallantaus. Water source quality analyses as a tool in mire restoration - im- pacts of restoration on water quality……………………………………….…….. 348 K. Tolonen & A. Pitkänen. Reliable postglacial fire record of boreal forests from peat stratigraphical data…………………………………………………….. 356 H.Vasander. The use of peatlands in Finland a special emphasis on restoration .. 365 О. Л. Кузнецов, М. Мякиля , А. В . Кравченко, М. А. Бойчук, А. И. Максимов. Путеводитель экскурсии по болотам к западу от пос. Матросы…………………………………………………………..……………… 378 Список авторов………………………………………………………………… 396 6 CONTENTS Introduction………………………………………………………………………. 9 G. A. Elina & O. L. Kuznetsov. The history and current status of mire research in Karelia. 55 years to Mire Ecosystems Laboratory. ……………………………. 11 V. K. Antipin. Mires biosphere national park " Vodlozersky " and their nature protection value………………………………………….………………………... 35 N. A. Berezina, E. M . Vorontsova. Arboreous junipers (Juniperus communis L.) on the mires of national park “Russkiy sever” (Vologda region)……………... 42 S. E. Vompersky, A. G. Kovalev, T. V. Glukhova, M. V. Smagina, A. E. Erofeev, M. Y. Zaznobin. About a technique of an estimation of contem- porary apparent rate of peat accumulation………………………………………… 48 O. V. Galanina Results of application of two main classification approaches to large scale mapping of bog vegetation……………………………………………. 60 , S. I. Grabovik. Dynamics mesotrophic herb-sphagnum mires structure and pro- ductivity after drainage in south Karelia………………………………………….. 73 V .P. Denisenkov, G. M. Chernova.The bogs North-West Ladoga region and dynamic of vegetation draining bogs and paludified land (on the example of Ladozhskaya field station)……………………….……………………………….. 83 T. Yu. Dyachkova. The permanent observations on populations of rare mire plant species……………………………………………………………………….. 91 T. G. Ivchenko. Flora, structure and features of distribution of mire's vegetation communities of southern Ural (On the example of the Ilmensky Nature Reserve) 99 E. V. Karmasina. Mosses flora of mires of National Park «Russkyi Sever» (Vo- logda district) ……………………………………………………………………... 111 V. A. Kolomytsev. Роtеntial of paludification in taiga landscapes of Karelia …... 121 A. V. Kravchenko. Flora of mires in Nature Reserve “Kozhoserskyi” (Ar- hangelsk district) ………………………………………………………………….. 129 O. L. Kuznetsov. Flora and vegetation of mires in Karelia…….………………… 145 S. A. Kutenkov. The vegetation of forested mires in middle taiga of Karelia …... 159 O. A. Marakaev, V. V. Gorokhova. Conservation of orchids genofund on mires of the Yaroslavl region ………………………….………………………………... 172 V. Yu. Neshatayeva, V. Yu. Neshatayev.The vegetation cover of the western Kamchatka and the northern Europe blanket–bogs: a comparative analysis …….. 181 I. M. Nesterenko. Influence peatlands reglamation on the regime of ground – and surface waters………………………………………….……………………… 193 S. M .Novicov. Hydrological and ecological aspects of problem of bogs´ eco- nomic development…………………………………….………………………….. 196 V. V. Panov. The spatial structure and dynamics of Sphagna mires on small forms of relief…………………………………………………………………….. 210 7 V. I. Sakovets. Drained forest and mire ecosystems importance for forestry and biosphere in Karelia……………………………………….……………………… 226 V.A. Smagin. The typology and vegetation of eutrophic fens of forest zone of European Russia…………………………………………………………………... 231 P. N. Tokarev. The development of method for designation of main mire types from space images with using data of land surface and distant sampling based on GIS technologies…………………………………………………………………..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 02Eae3eadc3f06674007a7ea3f3
    Nature Conservation Research. Заповедная наука 2021. 6(Suppl.1): 1–4 https://dx.doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2021.031 =================== EDITORIAL =================== ============== СЛОВО РЕДАКТОРА =============== RESEARCH IN THE KOSTOMUKSHA STATE NATURE RESERVE (RUSSIA) AND OTHER PROTECTED AREAS OF NORTHERN EUROPE Evgeny P. Ieshko1,* , Oleg L. Kuznetsov1 , Konstantin F. Tirronen1 , Sergey V. Tarkhov2 1Institute of Biology of Karelian Research Centre of RAS, Russia *e-mail: [email protected] 2Kostomuksha State Nature Reserve, Russia Received: 21.12.2020. Revised: 08.04.2021. Accepted: 10.04.2021. Protected Areas (PAs) perform essential biological and landscape diversity conservation functions. They also serve as na- ture labs and experimental grounds for various sorts of monitoring research around the world. An object for environmen- tal co-operation between neighbouring countries is an international PA, such as the Finnish-Russian Friendship Nature Reserve with Kostomuksha State Nature Reserve as its component part. Research in its Russian part has been conducted by scientists from the Russian Academy of Sciences, and Russian universities and PAs in collaboration with their foreign colleagues. This special issue of the journal Nature Conservation Research celebrates an anniversary of the foundation of the international Friendship Nature Reserve. It reports some results and current data on the state of ecosystems and their components both in the Kostomuksha State Nature Reserve and in some other PAs of Russia and Finland. Key words: biodiversity, monitoring, rare and endangered species, boreal zone, terrestrial and aquatic commu- nities, Valdai ice sheet Kostomuksha State Nature Reserve is a ProtectProtect-- of specialists from several institutes, formed the basis ed Area (PA), founded on 14.12.1983.
    [Show full text]
  • Translation Series No.2137
    FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA Translation Series No. 2137 • Salmon of Lake Onega • by YU. A. Smirnov -Original title: •Losost onezhskogo ozera Biologiya vosproiFvodstvo ispOliziovapie From: Lososi onezhskogo ozera Biolop.iya vosproizvodstvc* ispoll .zovanie (Salmon of Lake Onega), : 1-143, 1Q71 Translated by the Translation Bureau-( PH) . Foreign Languages Division Department of the Secretary of . State of Canada Department of the-Environment- Fisheries Research Board of Canada Biological Station. Nanaimd, b... Biological Station, St. Andrews, X. S. Biological Station, St. John's, Nfld. 19 72 195 & pages typescript lleibliography 7:7 1 OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE s E DEPAR'RENT c R F.Pr r; D'iT A T • TRANSLATION BUREAU bUREAU DES RADUCTIONS N iq E DES, E LANGUES GAN A DA. 1C D!.\fî5i N L. TA9SLATED FROM — TRADUCTION DE INTO — EN Fusq .d. P.n Elish AU rtiop. AuTuun rnov Yu. "FITLE FI•LISH — TITRE ANGLAIS salmon of Lake Onega l bioloy reprouction - utilizetion Title in foreign language (transliterate foreign characters) Loos' onezhskoiy) ozera biolos,j_ya vosproizvoCts1;vo ispol";:.ovP.nie ------ RE'FrE..- RENCE IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE (NAME OF BOOK OR PUBLICATION) IN FULL. TRANSLITERATE FOREIG4 CHA.RACTERS. rzr,-FE,.PENCE EN LANGUE ÉTRANGÉRE (NOM DU LIVRE OU PUBLICATION), AU COMPLET. TRANSCRIRE EN CARACTÉFiES PHONÉTIQUES. • REFERENcE IN ENGLISH — RÉFÉRENCE EN ANGLAIS Ao above PUBLISH ER —.ÉDITEUR PAGE NUMBERS IN ORIGINAL DATE OF PUBLICATION NUMÉROS DES PAGES DANS DATE DE PUBLICATION L'ORIGINAL yauka Press 3 143 YEAR ISSUE NO. VOLUME ANNÉE NUMERO PLACE OF PUBLICATION NUMBER OF TYPED PAGES LIEU DE PUBLICATION NOMBRE DE-PAGES DAÇTYLOGRAPHIÉEs 195 (exclusive of Lenirw.rad IWR 1971 Bibliographmj REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Environment TRANSLATION BUREAU NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Typology and Cultural-Chronological Variability of Bifacially Worked Implements of Siliceous Rocks from the Territory of Russian Karelia
    Typology and cultural-chronological variability of bifacially worked implements of siliceous rocks from the territory of Russian Karelia Alexey TARASOV Bifacially worked implements made of siliceous rocks constitute one of the most sig­ nificant groups of lithic tools from archaeological sites in present-day Karelia from the Neolithic to the Early Metal Period. In the present paper a generalised description of these artefacts during the whole period of their existence is given and the typology of these implements is discussed. The spread of bifacial industry, which was followed by the disappearance of blade industries, can be considered an epochal phenomenon, one of composing parts of the "Neolithic package" along with pottery production. The main tendencies in the development of bifacial industry were common for a very large territory of the forested zone of eastern Europe. Artiklis antakse ulevaade silikaatsetest kivimitest labatehnikas valmistatud esemetest, mis on uks peamisi leiuruhmi neoliitikumist kuni varase metalliajani tanapaeva Karjala alal. Kirjeldatakse esemete iseloomulikke jooni ning arutletakse nende tunnuste alusel loodud tiipoloogia iile. Labatehnika levik, mille jarel laasttehnika haabus, oli epohhi loov fenomen, mis koos keraamika valmistamise oskusega oli uks olulisimaid osi ,,ne- oliitilisest komplektist". Labatehnikas toodeldud esemete arengujooned on sarnased laiadel aladel Ida-Euroopa metsavootmes. Kev words: bifacial knapping technology, bifacially worked implements, siliceous rock, typology, Russian Karelia, Neolithic, Early Metal Period Votmesonad: labatehnika, labatehnikas valmistatud esemed, silikaatsed kivimid, tupoloogia, Vene Karjala, neoliitikum, varane metalliaeg, Institute for Language, Literature and History, Karelian Research Centre of RAS, Petrozavodsk, Russia; [email protected] 347 Alexey TARASOV Introduction Bifacially worked implements made of siliceous rocks constitute one of the most significant groups of lithic tools from archaeological sites of Neolithic — Early Metal Periods from present-day Karelia.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Unesco Biosphere Reserves Within the Barents Region
    Pilot study of UNESCO Biosphere Reserves within the Barents Region and the possibilities for collaboration Laplandskiy BR Vindelälven-Juhttátahkka BR Metsola BR Vodlozerskiy BR North Karelian BR Kenozerskiy BR January 2021 Anders Esselin, Man & Nature AB Johanna MacTaggart, the Swedish Man and Biosphere Programme SWEDISH FOREST AGENCY Foreword Barents Euro-Arctic Council (BEAC) is a forum for intergovernmental cooperation on issues concerning the Barents region. The objective of Barents cooperation is to strengthen peace, stability and sustainable development by improving opportunities for cooperation across the region’s borders. The chairmanship rotates every second year between Norway, Finland, Russia and Sweden. The aim of the Working Group on Barents Forest Sector (WGBFS) is to promote sustainable management and utilization of forest resources and ecosystem services in line with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, the United Nations Strategic Plan for Forests as well as the Paris Climate Agreement. The forest sector is an important part of the economic, social and environmental development in the Barents region and the forest plays a central role in the transition to a bio-based circular society. Priorities for the Norwegian chairmanship of the Working Group on Barents Forest Sector are to focus on the forest-based bioeconomy and the transition to a low-carbon society. Norway has given priority to knowledge creation by involving research organizations present in the region and strive to strengthen regional cooperation in the Barents region. Searching for new platforms for regional cooperation is a part of this effort. The pilot study was initiated in order to analyze the possibilities to use the Barents Cooperation as a potential platform to establish collaboration between Biosphere Reserve areas within the Barents region.
    [Show full text]
  • Arkhangelsk Region, Northwest Russia)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Journals from University of Tartu Folia Cryptog. Estonica, Fasc. 53: 111–121 (2016) http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/fce.2016.53.13 The lichens of forest rocky communities of the hill Muroigora (Arkhangelsk Region, Northwest Russia) Viktoria N. Tarasova1, Angella V. Sonina1, Vera I. Androsova1, Irina S. Stepanchikova2,3 1Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, Petrozavodsk State University, 33 Lenin St., 185910 Petrozavodsk, Russia. E-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 2Department of Botany, St. Petersburg State University (SPbSU), 7–9 Universitetskaya emb., 199034 St.-Petersburg, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 3Laboratory of Lichenology and Bryology, Komarov Botanical Institute RAS, 2 Professor Popov St., 197376 St. Petersburg, Russia Abstract: The present study reports 188 species and 2 subspecies of lichens and allied fungi from forest rocky communities of the hill Muroigora situated in the Arkhangelsk part of the National park “Vodlozersky” (Arkhangelsk Region, NW Russia). Lepraria ecorticata is new to Russia, and 13 more species are new for the mainland area of the Arkhangelsk Region: Arthonia mediella, Arthonia vinosa, Bacidia igniarii, Bryoria vrangiana, Chaenothecopsis pusiola, Cladonia caespiticia, Lecidea plana, Lepraria borealis, Micarea misella, Pertusaria pustulata, Schaereria cinereorufa, Xanthoparmelia pulla and Xylographa trunciseda. Two lichen species, Bryoria fremontii and Lobaria pulmonaria, are in the Red Data Books of the Arkhangelsk Region and Russian Federation. A total of 89 species are reported as new for the Vodlozersky National Park. Keywords: lichen list, old-growth forest, Vodlozersky National Park INTRODUCTION Rocky forest communities are typical for the The park is located on the eastern edge of territory of Fennoscandia.
    [Show full text]
  • Mires from Pole to Pole
    THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT 38 | 2012 NATURE Mires from pole to pole Tapio Lindholm and Raimo Heikkilä (eds.) Finnish Environment Institute THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT 38 | 2012 Mires from pole to pole Tapio Lindholm and Raimo Heikkilä (eds.) Helsinki 2012 FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT 38 | 2012 The Finnish Environment Institute Natural Environment Centre Layout: Pirjo Appelgren Cover: Tapio Lindholm, Olvassuo mire This publication is also available on the Internet at www.environment.fi/syke/publications Edita Prima Oy, Helsinki 2013 ONM IR EN NV T E A L IC L ISBN 978-952-11-4106-5 (pbk) A D B R E O L ISBN 978-952-11-4107-2 (PDF) N ISBN 978 -952-11- 4113 -3 (CD) ISSN 1238-7312 (print) 441 002 ISSN 1796-1637 (online) PEFC/02-31-135 Printed matter CONTENTS Towards the understanding of the variety of mires and their conservation in different countries ............................................................ 7 Tapio Lindholm and Raimo Heikkilä Patterns in polygon mires in north-eastern Yakutia, Siberia: The Role of Vegetation and Water ...........................................................19 Norman Donner, Merten Minke, Pim de Klerk, Roman Sofronov and Hans Joosten Mires on the map of Russia ........................................................................ 31 Tatiana Yurkovskaya Development of large-scale aapa mire hydrotopography on land-uplift coastland in northern Finland ................................................39 Sakari Rehell, Antti Huttunen†, Hanna Kondelin and Jarmo Laitinen The development of
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas of High Conservation Value Areas, and Analysis of Gaps And
    3. ANALYSIS OF DELIMITATION OF HCV AREAS AND ASSESSMENT OF REPRESENTATIVENESS OF PROTECTED AREA NETWORK IN NORTHWEST RUSSIA Elena Esipova, Konstantin Kobyakov, Andrey Korosov, Anton Korosov & Aleksander Markovsky Editor: Konstantin Kobyakov 3.1. Network of existing ered together with the zakazniks to which they protected areas are closest and have similar status and protection regime. A complete list of protected areas in the six regions of this study is presented in the Appendix, 3.1.1. Distribution of protected with total surface areas and year of establishment. areas by category Titles of protected areas on the maps correspond to those in the list of protected areas of Arkhangelsk The network of protected areas in the six admin- Region (A), Vologda Region (B), Leningrad Region istrative regions of northwest Russia(four regions, (C), the City of St. Petersburg (D), the Republic of one republic and City of St. Petersburg) that are Karelia (E), and Murmansk Region (F). included in this study is described in Chapter 1. Below we will discuss the representativeness of the It should be noted that the data on the total area areas of high conservation value (HCV areas) in the of protected areas with respect to the total area of protected area network in each of these regions. the administrative region are approximate, as the exact boundaries for several nature monuments The total number of protected areas (federal and in Arkhangelsk Region, as well as for some pro- regional levels) in the study area is 641: tected areas in Vologda Region and the Republic • 8 strict nature reserves or zapovedniks (five of Karelia, were not determined at the moment of with protected buffer zones) writing for various reasons (see notes in the Ap- • 5 national parks (one with protected buffer zone) pendix).
    [Show full text]
  • The Liverwort Flora of Karelian Part of the Vodlozersky National Park (Russia)
    Folia Cryptog. Estonica, Fasc. 56: 77–85 (2019) https://doi.org/10.12697/fce.2019.56.08 The liverwort flora of Karelian part of the Vodlozersky National Park (Russia) Eugene A. Borovichev1 & Ekaterina V. Shorohova2 1Institute of the Industrial Ecology Problems of the North of the Kola Science Center of RAS, 184209 Apatity, Russia E-mail: [email protected] 2Forest Research Institute of the Karelian Research Centre, Russian Academy of Science, 185910 Petrozavodsk, Russia E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: An updated list of liverworts in the Karelian part of Vodlozersky National Park is presented, containing 52 species. Twenty-three species were recorded in the National Park for the first time. Heterogemma capitata was found in Karelia for the first time; Calypogeia fissa and Tritomaria exsecta were reported for the second time in the region. The observations of the three species form the northern limit of their global range. New localities are reported for five Karelian red-listed species (Calypogeia suecica, Geocalyx graveolens, Pellia endiviifolia, Scapania apiculata, Syzygiella autumnalis). Keywords: liverworts, Vodlozersky National Park, Republic of Karelia, biodiversity, rare species INTRODUCTION Vodlozersky National Park is located between The climate is temperate continental with an 62°10’ N and 63°30’ N in the eastern part of oceanic influence. Mean annual temperature is the Republic of Karelia (Pudozh District) and +1.5 °C; mean January temperature is –11.5 °C, in the bordering western part of Archangelsk mean July temperature is +16 °C. The highest Region (Onega District) (Fig. 1). The protected recorded temperature is +32 °C, and the lowest area covers 468,300 ha, of which 130,600 ha is is –50 °C.
    [Show full text]
  • Documentation on World Heritage Properties (Natural)
    WHC-98/CONF.202/INF.5 Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage Documentation on World Heritage Properties (Natural) Bureau of the World Heritage Committee Twenty-second Extraordinary Session 27-28 November 1998- Kyoto, Japan Prepared by International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources 1196 Gland, Switzerland 10 October 1998 Site evaluations extracted from Document WHC- 98/CONF.203/INF.10 for twenty-second session of the World Heritage Committee WORLD HERITAGE NOMINATION - IUCN TECHNICAL EVALUATION RAVINES OF THE SLOVAK PARADIS AND THE DOBSINSKA ICE CAVE (SLOVAKIA) 1. DOCUMENTATION (i) IUCN/WCMC Data Sheet ( 6 references) (ii) Additional Literature Consulted: Lalkovic, M. 1995. On the Problems of the Ice Filling in the Dobsina Ice Cave. Acta Carsologica. Krasoslovni Zbornik XXIV; Courbon, P., C. Chabert, P. Bosted & K. Lindsley. 1989. Atlas of the Great Caves of the World; Waltham, T. 1974. Caves. Macmillan; Juberthie, C. 1995. Underground Habitats and their Protection. Nature and Environment No. 72. Council of Europe Press; Middleton, J. & T. Walthan. 1986. The Underground Atlas: A Gazetteer of The World's Cave Regions. St Mattin's Press; Watson, J. et al. 1997. Guidelines for Cave and Karst Protection. IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas' Working Group on Cave and Karst Protection. IUCN; Stanners, D. & Bourdeau, P. Eds. 1995. Europe's Environment The Dobris Assessment European Environment Agency; Esping, L. 1998. Potential Natural World Heritage Sites in Europe. Report on Parks for Life: Action for Protected Areas in Europe Priority Project 14a. IUCN- WCPA Europe/FNNPE-Europarc Federation. (iii) Consultations: 22 external reviewers, Slovensky raj National Park staff and Slovak Government Officials.
    [Show full text]
  • M.G. Kosmenko and I.S. Manjuhin ANCIENT IRON PRODUCTION IN
    Fennoscandia archaeolociga XVI (1999) M.G. Kosmenko and I.S. Manjuhin ANCIENT IRON PRODUCTION IN KARELIA Abstract In this paper some information about 61 sites with iron slag is given, and the remains of 26 furnaces from 14 sites in Karelia are described and classified. They belonged to the cultures of hunters and fishers of the Iron Age - Early Middle Ages and are dated to between 500 BC and 1300 AD. The furnaces for making raw iron are grouped into 4 types: 1. Ground ones, perhaps, with a construction of wood, dating back to the Iron Age in SE Karelia; 2. Original furnaces in the shape of rectangular stone boxes in W and NW Karelia of the Iron Age - Early Middle Ages; 3. 1\vo types of ground clay furnaces and pit furnaces built of stones, dated to the Iron Age - Early Middle Ages in South­ ern Karelia. Some issues are discussed; in particular, the disparity between relatively well developed raw iron pro­ duction in Karelia and the total lack of blacksmith's implements and smithies in the archaeological record. Keywords: iron production, iron slag, furnaces. M.G. Kosmenko and I.S. Manjuhin,lnstitute of Language, Literature and History, Karelian Research Centre RAS. Pushkinskaya II, 185610 Petrozavodsk, Russia. INTRODUCTION In the Early Middle Ages (10-14 centuries AD) the appearance of the material culture and the pattern of This survey of the present state of knowledge about iron cultural interactions changed radically. Most of Kare­ production in the territory of Russian Karelia, which is lia was occupied by an aceramic culture which in Fen­ situated in eastern Fennoscandia, is limited to the local noscandia is usually identified as Saami, but in the hunting-fishing cultures of the Iron Age - Early Middle southern part of the Lake Onega basin the culture which Ages.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Folia Cryptog. Estonica, Fasc. 57: 85–100 (2020) https://doi.org/10.12697/fce.2020.57.10 New and rare lichens and allied fungi from Arkhangelsk region, North-West Russia Viktoria N. Tarasova1, Liudmila A. Konoreva2, Mikhail P. Zhurbenko3, Tatiana N. Pystina4, Sergei V. Chesnokov5, Vera I. Androsova1, Angella V. Sonina1, Natalia A. Semenova4, Andrei A. Valekzhanin6 1Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, Petrozavodsk State University, 33 Lenin Str., 185910 Petrozavodsk, Russia. E-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 2Polar-alpine Botanical Garden-Institute, 184250 Murmansk Region, Kirovsk. E-mail: [email protected] 3Laboratory of the Systematics and Geography of Fungi, Komarov Botanical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 2 Professor Popov Str., 197376 St. Petersburg, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 4Department of Flora and Vegetation of the North, Institute of Biology of Komi Scientific Centre of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 28 Kommunisticheskaya Str., 167982 Syktivkar, Russia. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 5Laboratory of Lichenology and Bryology, Komarov Botanical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 2 Professor Popov Str., 197376 St. Petersburg, Russia 6N. Laverov Federal Center for Integrated Arctic Research RAS (FCIARctic), 23 Severnoy Dviny Embenkment, 163000 Arkhangelsk, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Thirty-one lichen-forming fungi, 12 lichenicolous fungi, and 5 non-lichenized fungi are reported as new for Arkhangelsk Region; 7 species are new for its mainland area. Micarea fallax is reported for the first time for Russia;M. laeta and M. pusilla are new for the European part of Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER GAP-Analysis Please Make Sure That You Have Adobe Acrobat Reader Version 6.0 Or Later Downloaded on Your Computer
    Forest and Nature in Northwest Russia Finnish-Russian Development Programme on Sustainable Forest Management and Conservation of Biological Diversity in Northwest Russia NEWSLETTER GAP-analysis Please make sure that you have Adobe Acrobat Reader version 6.0 or later downloaded on your computer. If not, you can download it free of charge at www.adobe.com Photo: Roman Polshvedkin NEWSLETTER 2012 Forest and Nature in Northwest Russia Finnish-Russian Development Programme on Sustainable Forest Management and Conservation of Biological Diversity in Northwest Russia The Finnish-Russian development programme on sustain- Karelia and the City of St. Petersburg. One of the projects, De- able forest management and conservation of biodiversity in velopment of Regional Protected Areas in Northwest Russia, Northwest Russia began in 1997. In Finland the cooperation aimed to develop administrative structures, train personnel has been governed by two ministries: Ministry of the Environ- and make management plans for regional protected areas. As ment and Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. In Russia the the regions had recently become responsible for the manage- 2....... Forest and Nature in Northwest highest authorities involved have been the Ministry of Natural ment of these territories, the timing was good. Russia Resources and Environment and the Federal Forestry Agency (Rosleshoz) - although the names of the responsible organisa- Another major project was GAP-analysis in Northwest Rus- tions in Russia have varied over the past fourteen year. For the sia – assessment of the representativeness and deficiencies of 3....... GAP-analysis in Northwest Russia most part, the forestry and nature conservation sections of the the protected area networks in the same six regions.
    [Show full text]