Supporting Information 2 3 Supplementary Text: Figures 4

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Supporting Information 2 3 Supplementary Text: Figures 4 1 SUPPORTING INFORMATION 2 3 SUPPLEMENTARY TEXT: FIGURES 4 5 6 Figure S1 Phylogenetic tree with 56 species of canids used during our analyses. This tree 7 was constructed by adding 19 extinct species to the phylogeny of extant canids of Porto 8 et al. (2019). The three major clades of Caninae are identified by the colors red (Wolves), 9 blue (Foxes), and green (South American canids). 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 16 17 Figure S2 Phylogenetic tree and ancestral range reconstruction for the whole tree under 18 DIVALIKE + J. The ancestral areas of the lineages are indicated at the nodes of the tree 19 and the color-coded circles at the tips represent the current areas occupied by each lineage. 20 The colors represent the different biogeographic regions as indicated in the legend (left). 2 21 22 Figure S3 Phylogenetic tree and ancestral range reconstruction for the whole tree under 23 BAYAREALIKE + J. The ancestral areas of the lineages are indicated at the nodes of the 24 tree and the color-coded circles at the tips represent the current areas occupied by each 25 lineage. The colors represent the different biogeographic regions as indicated in the 26 legend (left). 27 3 28 29 Figure S4 Phylogenetic tree and ancestral range reconstruction for the whole tree under 30 DIVALIKE. The ancestral areas of the lineages are indicated at the nodes of the tree and 31 the color-coded circles at the tips represent the current areas occupied by each lineage. 32 The colors represent the different biogeographic regions as indicated in the legend (left). 33 4 34 35 Figure S5 Phylogenetic tree and ancestral range reconstruction for the whole tree under 36 DEC. The ancestral areas of the lineages are indicated at the nodes of the tree and the 37 color-coded circles at the tips represent the current areas occupied by each lineage. The 38 colors represent the different biogeographic regions as indicated in the legend (left). 39 5 40 41 Figure S6 Phylogenetic tree and ancestral range reconstruction for the whole tree under 42 BAYAREALIKE. The ancestral areas of the lineages are indicated at the nodes of the 43 tree and the color-coded circles at the tips represent the current areas occupied by each 44 lineage. The colors represent the different biogeographic regions as indicated in the 45 legend (left). 46 6 47 48 Figure S7 Extinction rates for the whole tree (A) and for the three major clades of 49 Caninae: wolves (B), foxes (C), and South American canids (D). 50 51 SUPPLEMENTARY TEXT: TABLE LIST 52 53 Table S1. List of the 56 species of Canidae included in our study with the distribution 54 areas that they belong based on our eight biogeographical regions (Fig. 1 in the main text). 55 The original descriptor is also specified. Species marked with (*) are the 19 extinct canids 56 include in the tree of Porto et al. (2019). Species Biogeographic area Descriptor Canis lupus ACE Linnaeus, 1758 Canis anthus D Cuvier, 1820 Canis aureus C Linnaeus, 1758 Canis simensis D Rüppell, 1840 Canis rufus A Audubon and Bachman, 1851 Canis latrans A Say, 1823 7 Cuon alpinus E Pallas, 1811 Lycaon pictus D Temminck, 1820 Canis adustus D Sundevall, 1847 Canis mesomelas D Schreber, 1775 Lycalopex vetulus B Lund, 1842 Lycalopex sechurae B Thomas, 1900 Lycalopex gymnocercus B Fischer, 1814 Lycalopex culpaeus B Molina, 1782 Lycalopex fulvipes B Martin, 1837 Lycalopex griseus B Gray, 1837 Cerdocyon thous B Linnaeus, 1766 Atelocynus microtis B Sclater, 1883 Dusicyon australis † B Kerr, 1792 Chrysocyon brachyurus B Illiger, 1815 Speothos venaticus B Lund, 1842 Vulpes rueppellii DC Schinz, 1825 Vulpes vulpes ACE Linnaeus, 1758 Vulpes ferrilata E Hodgson, 1842 Vulpes corsac E Linnaeus, 1768 Vulpes velox A Say, 1823 Vulpes macrotis A Merriam, 1888 Vulpes lagopus AE Linnaeus, 1758 Vulpes chama D Smith, 1833 Vulpes bengalensis E Shaw, 1800 Vulpes pallida D Cretzschmar, 1826 8 Vulpes zerda D Zimmermann, 1780 Vulpes cana C Blanford, 1877 Nyctereutes procyonoides E Gray, 1834 Otocyon megalotis D Desmarest, 1822 Urocyon littoralis A Baird, 1857 Urocyon cinereoargenteus A Schreber, 1775 *Canis dirus † AB Leidy, 1858 *Canis armbrusteri † A Gidley, 1913 *Leptocyon vafer † A Leidy, 1858 *Leptocyon vulpinus † A Matthew, 1907 *Cuon javanicus † E Desmarest, 1820 *Canis ferox † A Miller and Carranza-Castaneda, 1998 *Canis edwardii † A Gazin, 1942 *Lycaon magnus † D Ewer and Singer, 1956 *Canis lepophagus † A Johnston, 1938 *Vulpes riffautae † D de Bonis et al., 2007 *Cerdocyon avius † AB Torres and Ferrusquia, 1981 *Chrysocyon nearcticus † A Tedford et al., 2009 *Dusicyon avus † B Burmeister, 1866 *Canis nehringi † B Ameghino, 1902 *Protocyon troglodytes † B Lund, 1838 *Protocyon scagliorum † B Giebel, 1855 *Nyctereutes donnezani † E Depéret, 1890 *Nyctereutes megamastoides † E Pomel, 1842 9 *Speothos pacivorus † B Lund, 1839 57 58 59 10 .
Recommended publications
  • Mammalia, Felidae, Canidae, and Mustelidae) from the Earliest Hemphillian Screw Bean Local Fauna, Big Bend National Park, Brewster County, Texas
    Chapter 9 Carnivora (Mammalia, Felidae, Canidae, and Mustelidae) From the Earliest Hemphillian Screw Bean Local Fauna, Big Bend National Park, Brewster County, Texas MARGARET SKEELS STEVENS1 AND JAMES BOWIE STEVENS2 ABSTRACT The Screw Bean Local Fauna is the earliest Hemphillian fauna of the southwestern United States. The fossil remains occur in all parts of the informal Banta Shut-in formation, nowhere very fossiliferous. The formation is informally subdivided on the basis of stepwise ®ning and slowing deposition into Lower (least fossiliferous), Middle, and Red clay members, succeeded by the valley-®lling, Bench member (most fossiliferous). Identi®ed Carnivora include: cf. Pseudaelurus sp. and cf. Nimravides catocopis, medium and large extinct cats; Epicyon haydeni, large borophagine dog; Vulpes sp., small fox; cf. Eucyon sp., extinct primitive canine; Buisnictis chisoensis, n. sp., extinct skunk; and Martes sp., marten. B. chisoensis may be allied with Spilogale on the basis of mastoid specialization. Some of the Screw Bean taxa are late survivors of the Clarendonian Chronofauna, which extended through most or all of the early Hemphillian. The early early Hemphillian, late Miocene age attributed to the fauna is based on the Screw Bean assemblage postdating or- eodont and predating North American edentate occurrences, on lack of de®ning Hemphillian taxa, and on stage of evolution. INTRODUCTION southwestern North America, and ®ll a pa- leobiogeographic gap. In Trans-Pecos Texas NAMING AND IMPORTANCE OF THE SCREW and adjacent Chihuahua and Coahuila, Mex- BEAN LOCAL FAUNA: The name ``Screw Bean ico, they provide an age determination for Local Fauna,'' Banta Shut-in formation, postvolcanic (,18±20 Ma; Henry et al., Trans-Pecos Texas (®g.
    [Show full text]
  • Entre Chien Et Loup
    ANNEE 2003 THESE : 2003 – TOU 3 – 4102 ENTRE CHIEN ET LOUP : ETUDE BIOLOGIQUE ET COMPORTEMENTALE _________________ THESE pour obtenir le grade de DOCTEUR VETERINAIRE DIPLOME D’ETAT présentée et soutenue publiquement en 2003 devant l’Université Paul-Sabatier de Toulouse par Laurent, Sylvain, Patrice NEAULT Né, le 7 janvier 1976 à BELFORT (Territoire de Belfort) ___________ Directeur de thèse : M. le Professeur Roland DARRE ___________ JURY PRESIDENT : M. Henri DABERNAT Professeur à l’Université Paul-Sabatier de TOULOUSE ASSESSEUR : M. Roland DARRE Professeur à l’Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de TOULOUSE M. Guy BODIN Professeur à l’Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de TOULOUSE MINISTERE DE L'AGRICULTURE ET DE LA PECHE ECOLE NATIONALE VETERINAIRE DE TOULOUSE Directeur : M. P. DESNOYERS Directeurs honoraires……. : M. R. FLORIO M. J. FERNEY M. G. VAN HAVERBEKE Professeurs honoraires….. : M. A. BRIZARD M. L. FALIU M. C. LABIE M. C. PAVAUX M. F. LESCURE M. A. RICO M. A. CAZIEUX Mme V. BURGAT M. D. GRIESS PROFESSEURS CLASSE EXCEPTIONNELLE M. CABANIE Paul, Histologie, Anatomie pathologique M. CHANTAL Jean, Pathologie infectieuse M. DARRE Roland, Productions animales M. DORCHIES Philippe, Parasitologie et Maladies Parasitaires M. GUELFI Jean-François, Pathologie médicale des Equidés et Carnivores M. TOUTAIN Pierre-Louis, Physiologie et Thérapeutique PROFESSEURS 1ère CLASSE M. AUTEFAGE André, Pathologie chirurgicale M. BODIN ROZAT DE MANDRES NEGRE Guy, Pathologie générale, Microbiologie, Immunologie M. BRAUN Jean-Pierre, Physique et Chimie biologiques et médicales M. DELVERDIER Maxence, Histologie, Anatomie pathologique M. EECKHOUTTE Michel, Hygiène et Industrie des Denrées Alimentaires d'Origine Animale M. EUZEBY Jean, Pathologie générale, Microbiologie, Immunologie M. FRANC Michel, Parasitologie et Maladies Parasitaires M.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidebook Contains Preliminary Findings of a Number of Concurrent Projects Being Worked on by the Trip Leaders
    TH FRIENDS OF THE PLEISTOCENE, ROCKY MOUNTAIN-CELL, 45 FIELD CONFERENCE PLIO-PLEISTOCENE STRATIGRAPHY AND GEOMORPHOLOGY OF THE CENTRAL PART OF THE ALBUQUERQUE BASIN OCTOBER 12-14, 2001 SEAN D. CONNELL New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources-Albuquerque Office, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, 2808 Central Ave. SE, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106 DAVID W. LOVE New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, NM 87801 JOHN D. SORRELL Tribal Hydrologist, Pueblo of Isleta, P.O. Box 1270, Isleta, NM 87022 J. BRUCE J. HARRISON Dept. of Earth and Environmental Sciences, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, NM 87801 Open-File Report 454C and D Initial Release: October 11, 2001 New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, NM 87801 NMBGMR OFR454 C & D INTRODUCTION This field-guide accompanies the 45th annual Rocky Mountain Cell of the Friends of the Pleistocene (FOP), held at Isleta Lakes, New Mexico. The Friends of the Pleistocene is an informal gathering of Quaternary geologists, geomorphologists, and pedologists who meet annually in the field. The field guide has been separated into two parts. Part C (open-file report 454C) contains the three-days of road logs and stop descriptions. Part D (open-file report 454D) contains a collection of mini-papers relevant to field-trip stops. This field guide is a companion to open-file report 454A and 454B, which accompanied a field trip for the annual meeting of the Rocky Mountain/South Central Section of the Geological Society of America, held in Albuquerque in late April.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF File
    1.08 1.19 1.46 Nimravus brachyops Nandinia binotata Neofelis nebulosa 115 Panthera onca 111 114 Panthera atrox 113 Uncia uncia 116 Panthera leo 112 Panthera pardus Panthera tigris Lynx issiodorensis 220 Lynx rufus 221 Lynx pardinus 222 223 Lynx canadensis Lynx lynx 119 Acinonyx jubatus 110 225 226 Puma concolor Puma yagouaroundi 224 Felis nigripes 228 Felis chaus 229 Felis margarita 118 330 227 331Felis catus Felis silvestris 332 Otocolobus manul Prionailurus bengalensis Felis rexroadensis 99 117 334 335 Leopardus pardalis 44 333 Leopardus wiedii 336 Leopardus geoffroyi Leopardus tigrinus 337 Pardofelis marmorata Pardofelis temminckii 440 Pseudaelurus intrepidus Pseudaelurus stouti 88 339 Nimravides pedionomus 442 443 Nimravides galiani 22 338 441 Nimravides thinobates Pseudaelurus marshi Pseudaelurus validus 446 Machairodus alberdiae 77 Machairodus coloradensis 445 Homotherium serum 447 444 448 Smilodon fatalis Smilodon gracilis 66 Pseudaelurus quadridentatus Barbourofelis morrisi 449 Barbourofelis whitfordi 550 551 Barbourofelis fricki Barbourofelis loveorum Stenogale Hemigalus derbyanus 554 555 Arctictis binturong 55 Paradoxurus hermaphroditus Genetta victoriae 553 558 Genetta maculata 559 557 660 Genetta genetta Genetta servalina Poiana richardsonii 556 Civettictis civetta 662 Viverra tangalunga 661 663 552 Viverra zibetha Viverricula indica Crocuta crocuta 666 667 Hyaena brunnea 665 Hyaena hyaena Proteles cristata Fossa fossana 664 669 770 Cryptoprocta ferox Salanoia concolor 668 772 Crossarchus alexandri 33 Suricata suricatta 775
    [Show full text]
  • Pliocene and Early Pleistocene) Faunas from New Mexico
    Chapter 12 Mammalian Biochronology of Blancan and Irvingtonian (Pliocene and Early Pleistocene) Faunas from New Mexico GARY S. MORGAN1 AND SPENCER G. LUCAS2 ABSTRACT Signi®cant mammalian faunas of Pliocene (Blancan) and early Pleistocene (early and medial Irvingtonian) age are known from the Rio Grande and Gila River valleys of New Mexico. Fossiliferous exposures of the Santa Fe Group in the Rio Grande Valley, extending from the EspanÄola basin in northern New Mexico to the Mesilla basin in southernmost New Mexico, have produced 21 Blancan and 6 Irvingtonian vertebrate assemblages; three Blancan faunas occur in the Gila River Valley in the Mangas and Duncan basins in southwestern New Mexico. More than half of these faunas contain ®ve or more species of mammals, and many have associated radioisotopic dates and/or magnetostratigraphy, allowing for correlation with the North American land-mammal biochronology. Two diverse early Blancan (4.5±3.6 Ma) faunas are known from New Mexico, the Truth or Consequences Local Fauna (LF) from the Palomas basin and the Buckhorn LF from the Mangas basin. The former contains ®ve species of mammals indicative of the early Blancan: Borophagus cf. B. hilli, Notolagus lepusculus, Neo- toma quadriplicata, Jacobsomys sp., and Odocoileus brachyodontus. Associated magnetostra- tigraphic data suggest correlation with either the Nunivak or Cochiti Subchrons of the Gilbert Chron (4.6±4.2 Ma), which is in accord with the early Blancan age indicated by the mam- malian biochronology. The Truth or Consequences LF is similar in age to the Verde LF from Arizona, and slightly older than the Rexroad 3 and Fox Canyon faunas from Kansas.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Cenozoic Large Mammal and Tortoise Extinction in South America
    Cione et al: Late Cenozoic extinction Rev.in South Mus. America Argentino Cienc. Nat., n.s.1 5(1): 000, 2003 Buenos Aires. ISSN 1514-5158 The Broken Zig-Zag: Late Cenozoic large mammal and tortoise extinction in South America Alberto L. CIONE1, Eduardo P. TONNI1, 2 & Leopoldo SOIBELZON1 1Departamento Científico Paleontología de Vertebrados, 'acultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Paseo del Bosque, 1900 La Plata, Argentina. 2Laboratorio de Tritio y Radiocarbono, LATYR. 'acultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Paseo del Bosque, 1900 La Plata, Argentina. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. Corresponding author: Alberto L. CIONE Abstract: During the latest Pleistocene-earliest Holocene, South American terrestrial vertebrate faunas suffered one of the largest (and probably the youngest) extinction in the world for this lapse. Megamammals, most of the large mammals and a giant terrestrial tortoise became extinct in the continent, and several complete ecological guilds and their predators disappeared. This mammal extinction had been attributed mainly to overkill, climatic change or a combination of both. We agree with the idea that human overhunting was the main cause of the extinction in South America. However, according to our interpretation, the slaughtering of mammals was accom- plished in a particular climatic, ecological and biogeographical frame. During most of the middle and late Pleis- tocene, dry and cold climate and open areas predominated in South America. Nearly all of those megamammals and large mammals that became extinct were adapted to this kind of environments. The periodic, though rela- tively short, interglacial increases in temperature and humidity may have provoked the dramatic shrinking of open areas and extreme reduction of the biomass (albeit not in diversity) of mammals adapted to open habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • New Canid Remains from Dolores Formation, Late Pleistocene-Early Holocene, Uruguay
    J Mammal Evol DOI 10.1007/s10914-017-9387-8 ORIGINAL PAPER New Canid Remains from Dolores Formation, late Pleistocene-early Holocene, Uruguay Aldo Manzuetti1 & Daniel Perea1 & Andrés Rinderknecht2 & Martín Ubilla1 # Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017 Abstract The fossil record of carnivorous mammals in Introduction Uruguay is scarce and fragmentary, but informative. In the present contribution, two new records of canids allocated in The fossil record of placental mammals with a carnivorous diet sediments of the Dolores Formation (late Pleistocene-early (Order Carnivora) in Uruguay is formed mostly by fragmentary Holocene) are described. These records, based on their and relatively scarce, but informative, remains that include skulls anatomical-comparative study and multivariate analysis, cor- and mandibles, isolated teeth, and a diversity of long bones. respond to two foxes: one of medium size, Cerdocyon thous, Particularly, the fossil record of canids includes few taxa, the late conforms to the first record of this taxon in the country, mean- Pleistocene Dusicyon avus Burmeister, 1866, Protocyon while the other one, of larger size, is referred to Dusicyon avus troglodytes Lund, 1838, and Lycalopex gymnocercus Fischer, and is the first fossil record of this animal in the south of the 1814, and the Holocene Canis Linnaeus, 1758 (Prevosti et al. territory and the second record in the whole country. Until 2009 and references therein), with variations in body size and now, the only carnivorous mammals registered in this forma- level of carnivory. tion were the hunters of large herbivores (Arctotherium sp. Most of the canid findings (Dusicyon, Protocyon,and and Smilodon populator).
    [Show full text]
  • Bayesian Phylogenetic Estimation of Fossil Ages Rstb.Royalsocietypublishing.Org Alexei J
    Downloaded from http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 20, 2016 Bayesian phylogenetic estimation of fossil ages rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org Alexei J. Drummond1,2 and Tanja Stadler2,3 1Department of Computer Science, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand 2Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, Eidgeno¨ssische Technische Hochschule Zu¨rich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland Research 3Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (SIB), Lausanne, Switzerland Cite this article: Drummond AJ, Stadler T. Recent advances have allowed for both morphological fossil evidence 2016 Bayesian phylogenetic estimation of and molecular sequences to be integrated into a single combined inference fossil ages. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371: of divergence dates under the rule of Bayesian probability. In particular, 20150129. the fossilized birth–death tree prior and the Lewis-Mk model of discrete morphological evolution allow for the estimation of both divergence times http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0129 and phylogenetic relationships between fossil and extant taxa. We exploit this statistical framework to investigate the internal consistency of these Accepted: 3 May 2016 models by producing phylogenetic estimates of the age of each fossil in turn, within two rich and well-characterized datasets of fossil and extant species (penguins and canids). We find that the estimation accuracy of One contribution of 15 to a discussion meeting fossil ages is generally high with credible intervals seldom excluding the issue ‘Dating species divergences using rocks true age and median relative error in the two datasets of 5.7% and 13.2%, and clocks’. respectively. The median relative standard error (RSD) was 9.2% and 7.2%, respectively, suggesting good precision, although with some outliers.
    [Show full text]
  • Genus/Species Skull Ht Lt Wt Stage Range Abacinonyx See Acinonyx Abathomodon See Speothos A
    Genus/Species Skull Ht Lt Wt Stage Range Abacinonyx see Acinonyx Abathomodon see Speothos A. fossilis see Icticyon pacivorus? Pleistocene Brazil Abelia U.Miocene Europe Absonodaphoenus see Pseudarctos L.Miocene USA A. bathygenus see Cynelos caroniavorus Acarictis L.Eocene W USA cf. A. ryani Wasatchian Colorado(US) A. ryani Wasatchian Wyoming, Colorado(US) Acinomyx see Acinonyx Acinonyx M.Pliocene-Recent Europe,Asia,Africa,N America A. aicha 2.3 m U.Pliocene Morocco A. brachygnathus Pliocene India A. expectata see Miracinonyx expectatus? Or Felis expectata? A. intermedius M.Pleistocene A. jubatus living Cheetah M.Pliocene-Recent Algeria,Europe,India,China A. pardinensis 91 cm 3 m 60 kg Astian-Biharian Italy,India,China,Germany,France A. sp. L.Pleistocene Tanzania,Ethiopia A. sp. Cf. Inexpectatus Blancan-Irvingtonian California(US) A. studeri see Miracinonyx studeri Blancan Texas(US) A. trumani see Miracinonyx trumani Rancholabrean Wyoming,Nevada(US) Acionyx possibly Acinonyx? A. cf. Crassidens Hadar(Ethiopia) Acrophoca 1.5 m U.Miocene-L.Pliocene Peru,Chile A. longirostris U.Miocene-L.Pliocene Peru A. sp. U.Miocene-L.Pliocene Chile Actiocyon M-U.Miocene W USA A. leardi Clarendonian California(US) A. sp. M.Miocene Oregon(US) Adcrocuta 82 cm 1.5 m U.Miocene Europe,Asia A. advena A. eximia 80 cm 1.5 m Vallesian-Turolian Europe(widespread),Asia(widespread) Adelphailurus U.Miocene-L.Pliocene W USA, Mexico,Europe A. kansensis Hemphillian Arizona,Kansas(US),Chihuahua(Mexico) Adelpharctos M.Oligocene Europe Adilophontes L.Miocene W USA A. brachykolos Arikareean Wyoming(US) Adracodon probably Adracon Eocene France A. quercyi probably Adracon quercyi Eocene France Adracon U.Eocene-L.Oligocene France A.
    [Show full text]
  • 1: Beast2.1.3 R1
    1: Beast2.1.3_r1 0.93 Canis adustus 0.89 Canis mesomelas 0.37 Canis simensis Canis arnensis 1 Lycaon pictus 1 Cuon javanicus 0.57 Xenocyon texanus 0.91 Canis antonii 0.96 0.35 Canis falconeri 1 Canis dirus 1 Canis armbrusteri 0.060.27 Canis lupus Canis chihliensis Canis etruscus 0.98 0.99 0.26 Canis variabilis 0.11 Canis edwardii 0.93 Canis mosbachensis 0.68 0.58 Canis latrans Canis aureus 0.94 Canis palmidens 0.94 Canis lepophagus 1 0.41 Canis thooides Canis ferox 0.99 Eucyon davisi 0.8 Cerdocyon texanus Vulpes stenognathus Leptocyon matthewi 0.98 Urocyon cinereoargenteus 0.85 Urocyon minicephalus 0.96 1 Urocyon citronus 1 Urocyon galushi 0.96 Urocyon webbi 1 1 Metalopex merriami 0.23 Metalopex macconnelli 0.68 Leptocyon vafer 1 Leptocyon leidyi Leptocyon vulpinus 0.7 Leptocyon gregorii 1 Leptocyon douglassi Leptocyon mollis 0.32 Borophagus dudleyi 1 Borophagus hilli 0.98 Borophagus diversidens 0.97 Borophagus secundus 0.18 Borophagus parvus 1 Borophagus pugnator 1 Borophagus orc 1 Borophagus littoralis 0.96 Epicyon haydeni 1 0.92 Epicyon saevus Epicyon aelurodontoides Protepicyon raki 0.98 0.28 Carpocyon limosus 0.96 Carpocyon webbi 0.97 0.98 Carpocyon robustus Carpocyon compressus 0.17 0.87 Paratomarctus euthos Paratomarctus temerarius Tomarctus brevirostris 0.31 0.85 0.35 Tomarctus hippophaga 0.17 Tephrocyon rurestris Protomarctus opatus 0.24 0.58 Microtomarctus conferta Metatomarctus canavus Psalidocyon marianae 0.79 1 Aelurodon taxoides 0.32 0.27 Aelurodon ferox 1 Aelurodon stirtoni 0.14 Aelurodon mcgrewi 0.33 Aelurodon asthenostylus
    [Show full text]
  • Constraining the Time of Extinction of the South American Fox Dusicyon Avus (Carnivora, Canidae) During the Late Holocene
    Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 12, EGU2010-577-1, 2010 EGU General Assembly 2010 © Author(s) 2009 Constraining the time of extinction of the South American fox Dusicyon avus (Carnivora, Canidae) during the late Holocene. Francisco Prevosti (1), Fernando Santiago (2), Luciano Prates (3), Mónica Salemme (2), and Fabiana Martin (4) (1) División Mastozoología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, Angel Gallardo 470, Buenos Aires , Argentina ([email protected]), (2) CADIC, Ushuaia, Argentina, (3) División Arqueología, Museo de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina, (4) CEQUA, Punta Arenas, Chile The mass extinction at the end of the Pleistocene affected South America during the Late Pleistocene and the Early Holocene, when megamammals and large mammals disappeared. Several carnivores became extinct, like the sabretooth Smilodon, the short face bear (Arctotherium) and some large canids (i.e. Protocyon, Canis dirus). After this mass event virtually no carnivores became extinct in South America. The only exception is the fox Dusicyon avus, a middle sized canid (estimated body mass between 10-15 kg) with a more carnivore diet than the living South American foxes (i.e. Lycalopex culpaeus). The last record of the species comes from middle-late Holocene archaeological sites in the Pampean Region (Argentina) and Patagonia (Argentina and Chile). During the Late Pleistocene D. avus had a wide distribution, that covered part of Uruguay, Argentina (Buenos Aires province) and the southernmost Chile. Albeit some remains from late Holocene sites have been published, these remains lack of isotopic dates that could (allow?) constraint (to determine) the date of extinction of this fox. In this contribution we present several new records from the Pampean Region and Patagonia, and several taxon dates.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Characteristics of New York Coyotes
    GENETIC STATUS AND MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MAINE COYOTES AS RELATED TO NEIGHBORING COYOTE AND WOLF POPULATIONS1 PAUL J. WILSON, Natural Resources DNA Profiling & Forensic Center, Department of Biology, Trent University, 1600 East Bank Drive, Peterborough, Ontario, K9J 7B8 WALTER J. JAKUBAS, Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, Bangor, Maine, 04444 SHEVENELL MULLEN, Department of Wildlife Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, 04473 Summary This project was undertaken in response to discussions on wolf recovery in the Northeast and how hybridization with coyotes might affect the feasibility of wolf recovery, the ecological justification for wolf recovery, and coyote management. The original objectives of the study were to (1) characterize the types of Canis in Maine – i.e. coyotes, eastern Canadian wolves, gray wolves, or hybrids; (2) determine the geographic origin of these canids; and (3) locate historic specimens of New England wolves and determine their genetic profile. In addition to these objectives, we tested the hypothesis that wolf genes have not introgressed into the eastern coyote population by comparing the genetic profiles of 100 coyotes collected from Maine to wolves from Quebec and Ontario; eastern coyotes from New York and New Brunswick; and western coyotes from 1 This document should be cited: Wilson, P. J., W. J. Jakubas, and S. Mullen. 2004. Genetic status and morphological characteristics of Maine coyotes as related to neighboring coyote and wolf populations. Final report to the Maine Outdoor Heritage Fund Board, Grant #011-3-7. Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, Bangor, 58 pp. 1 Texas, Ohio, and North Carolina. Based on Bayesian cluster analysis and estimates of ancestry, 93% (n = 100) of Maine's canids had ancestries > 50% eastern coyote, 22% had a wolf ancestries >5%, one animal had a wolf ancestry of 89%, and only 4% of Maine coyotes had ancestries similar to western coyotes (i.e., >50% western coyote).
    [Show full text]