DOCSLIB.ORG

THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY of AMERICA Technique for Reducing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY of AMERICA Technique for Reducing THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Technique for Reducing Laser Beam Divergence of Intra-Cavity Nonlinear Conversion A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences School of Engineering Of The Catholic University of America In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctor of Engineering By Alan D. Hays Washington, D.C. 2014 Technique for Reducing Laser Beam Divergence of Intra-Cavity Nonlinear Conversion Alan D. Hays, PhD Director: Scott Mathews, PhD During the past few years the Monoblock laser has become the laser-of-choice for laser range-finders. It’s eye-safe 1570 nm emission, high pulse energy, simple construction, and high efficiency, when pumped by a laser-diode stack, provide advantages that are not available with other laser types. Although the relative divergence of the Monoblock output beam is large, it can be reduced to the required <1 mR using a telescope with a large magnification. This solution, however, is not acceptable for applications where the laser and telescope size must be kept to a minimum. A simple and compact technique for achieving significant reduction in the Monoblock beam divergence using a partial reflector that is placed a short distance from the optical parametric oscillator (OPO) has been developed. Using an ultra-compact 38 mm Monoblock with a 10 mm long KTP OPO, we achieved a beam divergence of <4 mR, corresponding to a >2.5 X reduction from the unmodified laser. Modeling and experimental results are presented detailing the theory and performance for this novel technique. This dissertation by Alan D. Hays fulfills the dissertation requirement for the doctoral degree in Electrical Engineering approved by Dr. Scott A. Mathews, as Director, and by Dr. Jessica Ramella-Roman, and Dr. Lew Goldberg as Readers. _________________________________ Dr. Scott A. Mathews, Director _________________________________ Dr. Jessica Ramella-Roman, Reader _________________________________ Dr. Lew Goldberg, Reader ii Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Monoblock ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Optical Parametric Oscillators ............................................................................................. 13 2.2 Diode-Pumping of Solid-State Laser ................................................................................... 17 3. Etalon Theory ............................................................................................................................... 22 3.1 Composite Output Coupler ........................................................................................................ 27 4. Techniques for Transverse Mode Discrimination ........................................................................ 35 4.1 Variable Reflectivity Mirrors ..................................................................................................... 35 4.2 Polarization Dependent Output Couplers ................................................................................... 38 5. Results and Observations ............................................................................................................. 41 5.2 Experimental Results ................................................................................................................. 47 6. Feedback mirror applied to Nd:YAG laser .................................................................................. 63 7. Conclusions and Future Work ...................................................................................................... 70 8. Bibliography ................................................................................................................................ 73 iii List of Figures Figure 1 - Photograph of Monoblock assembly ............................................................................................ 5 Figure 2 - Schematic of Monoblock detailing optical components and surface coatings ............................. 5 Figure 3 CAD model of assembly and test fixture ........................................................................................ 6 Figure 4 - SMC Output energy distribution for lot shipped ........................................................................ 11 Figure 5 - SMC Divergence distribution for lot shipped ............................................................................ 11 Figure 6 - Tuning curves for x-cut KTP OPO [19], units shown with labels versus angle ........................ 15 Figure 7 - Absorption spectrum of Nd:YAG [24] ....................................................................................... 18 Figure 8 - Absorption convolution with single and three color pumps ....................................................... 20 Figure 9 - Laser diode array specifications, [27] ........................................................................................ 21 Figure 10 - Laser diode array spectrum and I-P curve ................................................................................ 21 Figure 11 - Schematic of etalon .................................................................................................................. 23 Figure 12 - Transmission through etalon versus phase R=0.7 .................................................................... 24 Figure 13 - Transmission of divergent light through etalon ....................................................................... 25 Figure 14 - Schematic of OPO and Feedback Mirror ................................................................................. 28 Figure 15 - Effective reflectivity of composite mirror versus angle, in radians. OPO mirror .................... 29 reflectivities of 60% and feedback mirror of 40%, length 10 mm .............................................................. 29 Figure 16 - Minimum reflection node versus composite mirror length ...................................................... 31 Figure 17 - Angular dependence of the effective reflectivity for three composite mirror .......................... 32 Figure 18 - Angular dependence of the effective reflectivity for feedback mirror reflectivites ................. 33 Figure 19 - Normal incident maximum reflection of composite mirror ..................................................... 34 Figure 20 - Variable Reflectivity profiles for n = 2, 4, 8 ............................................................................ 36 Figure 21 - Transmission vs radius for birefrinegent lens, radial units in mm ........................................... 39 iv Figure 22 - Schematic of experimental arrangement .................................................................................. 41 Figure 23 - Experimental arrangement showing laser diode array, Monoblock assembly, ........................ 42 feedback mirror and interference filter to pass only 1.57 µm energy. ........................................................ 42 Figure 24 - Laser diode pump current pulse (200µsec), 1.064 µm fluorescence build up, and Q .............. 44 switched output ........................................................................................................................................... 44 Figure 25 - Far field beam divergence using 40% R .................................................................................. 48 Figure 26 - Far field beam divergence using 60% R .................................................................................. 49 Figure 27 - Monoblock output energies versus feedback mirror position .................................................. 50 Figure 28 – Laser output energy showing pulse to pulse stability .............................................................. 51 Figure 29 - Beam divergence using convex feedback mirrors .................................................................... 53 Figure 30 - Output energy for convex feedback mirrors............................................................................. 53 Figure 31 - Beam divergence as a function of feedback mirror misalignment ........................................... 54 Figure 32 - Temporal pulselength of the Monoblock output. Peak intensities were normalized for both pulses. (normalized intensity, a.u.) ............................................................................................................. 56 Figure 33 - Monoblock emission spectra without feedback mirror ............................................................ 57 Figure 34 - Monoblock emission spectra with feedback mirror ................................................................. 57 Figure 35 - Far field image with no feedback mirror .................................................................................. 60 Figure 36 - Far Field image with feedback mirror at 5 mm ........................................................................ 61 Figure 37 - Far field image with feedback mirror at 50 mm ....................................................................... 62 Figure 38 - Divergence for 1.064 µm long pulse laser. .............................................................................. 64 Figure 39 - 1.064 µm far field divergence without feedback mirror. ........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Beam Profiling by Michael Scaggs
    Beam Profiling by Michael Scaggs Haas Laser Technologies, Inc. Introduction Lasers are ubiquitous in industry today. Carbon Dioxide, Nd:YAG, Excimer and Fiber lasers are used in many industries and a myriad of applications. Each laser type has its own unique properties that make them more suitable than others. Nevertheless, at the end of the day, it comes down to what does the focused or imaged laser beam look like at the work piece? This is where beam profiling comes into play and is an important part of quality control to ensure that the laser is doing what it intended to. In a vast majority of cases the laser beam is simply focused to a small spot with a simple focusing lens to cut, scribe, etch, mark, anneal, or drill a material. If there is a problem with the beam delivery optics, the laser or the alignment of the system, this problem will show up quite markedly in the beam profile at the work piece. What is Beam Profiling? Beam profiling is a means to quantify the intensity profile of a laser beam at a particular point in space. In material processing, the "point in space" is at the work piece being treated or machined. Beam profiling is accomplished with a device referred to a beam profiler. A beam profiler can be based upon a CCD or CMOS camera, a scanning slit, pin hole or a knife edge. In all systems, the intensity profile of the beam is analyzed within a fixed or range of spatial Haas Laser Technologies, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.Laser Vocabulary
    ! Laser Beam Measurement Vocabulary Wavelength: In physics, the wavelength of a sinusoidal wave is the spatial period of the wave— the distance over which the wave's shape repeats,[1] and the inverse of the spatial frequency. It is usually determined by considering the distance between consecutive corresponding points of the same phase, such as crests, troughs, or zero crossings and is a characteristic of both traveling waves and standing waves, as well as other spatial wave patterns.[2][3] Wavelength is commonly designated by the Greek letter lambda (λ). " λ: The Greek symbol lambda is used to express wavelength. Gaussian: The graph of a Gaussian is a characteristic symmetric "bell curve" shape. The parameter a, is the height of the curve's peak, b is the position of the center of the peak and c (the standard deviation, sometimes called the Gaussian RMS width) controls the width of the "bell". Gaussian functions are widely used in statistics where they describe the normal distributions, in signal processing where they serve to define Gaussian filters, in image processing where two- dimensional Gaussians are used for Gaussian blurs, and in mathematics where they are used to solve heat equations and diffusion equations and to define the Weierstrass transform. 3050 North 300 West North Logan, UT 84341 Tel: 435-753-3729 www.ophiropt.com/photonics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_function " A Gaussian beam is a beam that has a normal distribution in all directions similar to the images below. The intensity is highest in the center of the beam and dissipates as it reaches the perimeter of the beam.
    [Show full text]
  • Laser Beam Profile Meaurement System Time
    Measurement of Laser Beam Profile and Propagation Characteristics 1. Laser Beam Measurement Capabilities Laser beam profiling plays an important role in such applications as laser welding, laser focusing, and laser free-space communications. In these applications, laser profiling enables to capture the data needed to evaluate the change in the beam width and determine the details of the instantaneous beam shape, allowing manufacturers to evaluate the position of hot spots in the center of the beam and the changes in the beam’s shape. Digital wavefront cameras (DWC) with software can be used for measuring laser beam propagation parameters and wavefronts in pulsed and continuous modes, for lasers operating at visible to far- infrared wavelengths: - beam propagation ratio M²; - width of the laser beam at waist w0; - laser beam divergence angle θ x, θ y; - waist location z-z0; - Rayleigh range zRx, zRy; - Ellipticity; - PSF; - Wavefront; - Zernike aberration modes. These parameters allow: - controlling power density of your laser; - controlling beam size, shape, uniformity, focus point and divergence; - aligning delivery optics; - aligning laser devices to lenses; - tuning laser amplifiers. Accurate knowledge of these parameters can strongly affect the laser performance for your application, as they highlight problems in laser beams and what corrections need to be taken to get it right. Figure 1. Characteristics of a laser beam as it passes through a focusing lens. http://www.SintecOptronics.com http://www.Sintec.sg 1 2. Beam Propagation Parameters M², or Beam Propagation Ratio, is a value that indicates how close a laser beam is to being a single mode TEM00 beam.
    [Show full text]
  • Optics of Gaussian Beams 16
    CHAPTER SIXTEEN Optics of Gaussian Beams 16 Optics of Gaussian Beams 16.1 Introduction In this chapter we shall look from a wave standpoint at how narrow beams of light travel through optical systems. We shall see that special solutions to the electromagnetic wave equation exist that take the form of narrow beams – called Gaussian beams. These beams of light have a characteristic radial intensity profile whose width varies along the beam. Because these Gaussian beams behave somewhat like spherical waves, we can match them to the curvature of the mirror of an optical resonator to find exactly what form of beam will result from a particular resonator geometry. 16.2 Beam-Like Solutions of the Wave Equation We expect intuitively that the transverse modes of a laser system will take the form of narrow beams of light which propagate between the mirrors of the laser resonator and maintain a field distribution which remains distributed around and near the axis of the system. We shall therefore need to find solutions of the wave equation which take the form of narrow beams and then see how we can make these solutions compatible with a given laser cavity. Now, the wave equation is, for any field or potential component U0 of Beam-Like Solutions of the Wave Equation 517 an electromagnetic wave ∂2U ∇2U − µ 0 =0 (16.1) 0 r 0 ∂t2 where r is the dielectric constant, which may be a function of position. The non-plane wave solutions that we are looking for are of the form i(ωt−k(r)·r) U0 = U(x, y, z)e (16.2) We allow the wave vector k(r) to be a function of r to include situations where the medium has a non-uniform refractive index.
    [Show full text]
  • Diffraction Effects in Transmitted Optical Beam Difrakční Jevy Ve Vysílaném Optickém Svazku
    BRNO UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY VYSOKÉ UČENÍ TECHNICKÉ V BRNĚ FACULTY OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMMUNICATION DEPARTMENT OF RADIO ELECTRONICS FAKULTA ELEKTROTECHNIKY A KOMUNIKAČNÍCH TECHNOLOGIÍ ÚSTAV RADIOELEKTRONIKY DIFFRACTION EFFECTS IN TRANSMITTED OPTICAL BEAM DIFRAKČNÍ JEVY VE VYSÍLANÉM OPTICKÉM SVAZKU DOCTORAL THESIS DIZERTAČNI PRÁCE AUTHOR Ing. JURAJ POLIAK AUTOR PRÁCE SUPERVISOR prof. Ing. OTAKAR WILFERT, CSc. VEDOUCÍ PRÁCE BRNO 2014 ABSTRACT The thesis was set out to investigate on the wave and electromagnetic effects occurring during the restriction of an elliptical Gaussian beam by a circular aperture. First, from the Huygens-Fresnel principle, two models of the Fresnel diffraction were derived. These models provided means for defining contrast of the diffraction pattern that can beused to quantitatively assess the influence of the diffraction effects on the optical link perfor- mance. Second, by means of the electromagnetic optics theory, four expressions (two exact and two approximate) of the geometrical attenuation were derived. The study shows also the misalignment analysis for three cases – lateral displacement and angular misalignment of the transmitter and the receiver, respectively. The expression for the misalignment attenuation of the elliptical Gaussian beam in FSO links was also derived. All the aforementioned models were also experimentally proven in laboratory conditions in order to eliminate other influences. Finally, the thesis discussed and demonstrated the design of the all-optical transceiver. First, the design of the optical transmitter was shown followed by the development of the receiver optomechanical assembly. By means of the geometric and the matrix optics, relevant receiver parameters were calculated and alignment tolerances were estimated. KEYWORDS Free-space optical link, Fresnel diffraction, geometrical loss, pointing error, all-optical transceiver design ABSTRAKT Dizertačná práca pojednáva o vlnových a elektromagnetických javoch, ku ktorým dochádza pri zatienení eliptického Gausovského zväzku kruhovou apretúrou.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1410.8722V1 [Quant-Ph] 31 Oct 2014
    Divergence of an orbital-angular-momentum-carrying beam upon propagation Miles Padgett1, Filippo M. Miatto2, Martin Lavery1, Anton Zeilinger3;4, and Robert W. Boyd1;2;5 1School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom 2Dept. of Physics, University of Ottawa, 150 Louis Pasteur, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5 Canada 3Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information (IQOQI), Austrian Academy of Sciences, Boltzmanngasse 3, A-1090 Vienna, Austria 4Vienna Center for Quantum Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Boltzmanngasse 5, A-1090 Vienna, Austria and 5The Institute of Optics, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, USA (Dated: February 12, 2018) There is recent interest in the use of light beams carrying orbital angular momentum (OAM) for creating multiple channels within free-space optical communication systems. One limiting issue is that, for a given beam size at the transmitter, the beam divergence angle increases with increasing OAM, thus requiring a larger aperture at the receiving optical system if the efficiency of detection is to be maintained. Confusion exists as to whether this divergence scales linarly with, or with the square root of, the beam's OAM. We clarify how both these scaling laws are valid, depending upon whether it is the radius of the Gaussian beam waist or the rms intensity which is kept constant while varying the OAM. I. INTRODUCTION intensity of one of these modes, r(Imax), is given as [3] r ` Over the past 20 years there has been a growing in- r(Imax) = j jw(z); (2) terest in the orbital angular momentum (OAM) of light, 2 which is carried by any optical beam possessing helical p 2 2 1 2 where w(z) = w0 1 + z =zR and zR = 2 kw0 is the phase fronts [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Laser Far-Field Beam-Profile Measurements by the Focal Plane Technique
    Aii'i O ft % NBS TECHNICAL NOTE 1001 *"*€AU Of '' NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS The National Bureau of Standards^ was established by an act of Congress March 3, 1901. The Bureau's overall goal is to strengthen and advance the Nation's science and technology and facilitate their effective application for public benefit. To this end, the Bureau conducts research and provides; (1) a basis for the Nation's physical measurement system, (2) scientific and technological services for industry and government, (3) a technical basis for equity in trade, and (4) technical services to pro- mote pubhc safety. The Bureau consists of the Institute for Basic Standards, the Institute for Materials Research, the Institute for Applied Technology, the Institute for Computer Sciences and Technology, the OflSce for Information Programs, and the Office of Experimental Technology Incentives Program. THE INSTITUTE FOR BASIC STANDARDS provides the central basis within the United States of a complete and consist- ent system of physical measurement; coordinates that system with measurement systems of other nations; and furnishes essen- tial services leading to accurate and uniform physical measurements throughout the Nation's scientific community, industry, and commerce. The Institute consists of the Office of Measurement Services, and the following center and divisions: Applied Mathematics — Electricity — Mechanics — Heat — Optical Physics — Center for Radiation Research — Lab- oratory Astrophysics'' — Cryogenics" — Electromagnetics^ — Time and Frequency*. THE INSTITUTE FOR MATERIALS RESEARCH conducts materials research leading to improved methods of measure- ment, standards, and data on the properties of well-characterized materials needed by industry, commerce, educational insti- tutions, and Government; provides advisory and research services to other Government agencies; and develops, produces, and distributes standard reference materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaussian Beams • Diffraction at Cavity Mirrors Creates Gaussian Spherical
    Gaussian Beams • Diffraction at cavity mirrors creates Gaussian Spherical Waves • Recall E field for Gaussian U ⎛ ⎡ x2 + y2 ⎤⎞ 0 ⎜ ( ) ⎟ u( x,y,R,t ) = exp⎜i⎢ω t − Kr − ⎥⎟ R ⎝ ⎣ 2R ⎦⎠ • R becomes the radius of curvature of the wave front • These are really TEM00 mode emissions from laser • Creates a Gaussian shaped beam intensity ⎛ − 2r 2 ⎞ 2P ⎛ − 2r 2 ⎞ I( r ) I exp⎜ ⎟ exp⎜ ⎟ = 0 ⎜ 2 ⎟ = 2 ⎜ 2 ⎟ ⎝ w ⎠ π w ⎝ w ⎠ Where P = total power in the beam w = 1/e2 beam radius • w changes with distance z along the beam ie. w(z) Measurements of Spotsize • For Gaussian beam important factor is the “spotsize” • Beam spotsize is measured in 3 possible ways • 1/e radius of beam • 1/e2 radius = w(z) of the radiance (light intensity) most common laser specification value 13% of peak power point point where emag field down by 1/e • Full Width Half Maximum (FWHM) point where the laser power falls to half its initial value good for many interactions with materials • useful relationship FWHM = 1.665r1 e FWHM = 1.177w = 1.177r 1 e2 w = r 1 = 0.849 FWHM e2 Gaussian Beam Changes with Distance • The Gaussian beam radius of curvature with distance 2 ⎡ ⎛π w2 ⎞ ⎤ R( z ) = z⎢1 + ⎜ 0 ⎟ ⎥ ⎜ λz ⎟ ⎣⎢ ⎝ ⎠ ⎦⎥ • Gaussian spot size with distance 1 2 2 ⎡ ⎛ λ z ⎞ ⎤ w( z ) = w ⎢1 + ⎜ ⎟ ⎥ 0 ⎜π w2 ⎟ ⎣⎢ ⎝ 0 ⎠ ⎦⎥ • Note: for lens systems lens diameter must be 3w0.= 99% of power • Note: some books define w0 as the full width rather than half width • As z becomes large relative to the beam asymptotically approaches ⎛ λ z ⎞ λ z w(z) ≈ w ⎜ ⎟ = 0 ⎜ 2 ⎟ ⎝π w0 ⎠ π w0 • Asymptotically light
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Wave & Beam Optics
    Lecture 1 Wave and Beam optics Mostly from Chapters 2, 3, 5 The fundamentals of optics at the introductory level are mostly treated using the “plane wave” model. The plane waves have an infinite extent in the transverse direction. Plane waves, however, never existed in the real world. This lecture is to establish the basics of waves of finite cross section. Wave function Light propagates in the form of waves. In free space, the waves are governed by the wave equation, 1 ∂ 2U ∇ 2U − = 0 (1) c 2 ∂t 2 where u is a function of r and t. In a one-dimensional system, the solutions are u(x-ct) and u(x+ct). From the theory of electromagnetics, both the E and H fields of the electromagnetic waves in vacuum satisfies Eq. (1). The form of Eq.(1) for E and H can be derived from Maxwell’s equations. ∂E ∇ × H = ε 0 ∂t ∂H ∇ × E = −µ 0 Maxqwell 'sequation in free space ∂t ∇ ⋅ E = 0 ∇ ⋅ H = 0 Try to prove that both the E and H satisfy equation (1). The monochromatic harmonic waves can be expressed as jφ (r )− j 2πνt U (r,t) = a(r)e (2) where U is known as the complex wave function, and the real part, u(r,t), is given by u(r,t) = U +U * (3) Why using the harmonic waves? The “ wavefronts” are the surfaces of equal phase φ(r) = cons tan t . The optical intensity (power 2 per unit area) is given by I(r) = U (r) . The Helmhotz Equation: ( governing the spatial dependency of monochromatic waves) 1 For a given harmonic function U, the spatial-temporal differential equation in (1) can be reduced to a differential equation in space only.
    [Show full text]
  • Demonstration of Synergic Fresnel and Fraunhofer Diffraction For
    Demonstration of synergic Fresnel and Fraunhofer diffraction for application to micrograting fabrication Pritam P Shetty, Jayachandra Bingi* Bio-inspired research and development (BiRD) laboratory, Photonic Devices and Sensors (PDS) Laboratory, Indian Institute of Information Technology Design and Manufacturing (IIITDM) Kancheepuram, Chennai, India - 600127. Email: [email protected] , [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TABLE OF CONTENTS • Abstract ---------------------------------------------------------- P 1 • Introduction ------------------------------------------------------ P 1 • Results and Discussion ----------------------------------------- P 2 • Demonstration of Synergic diffraction----------------------- P 2 • Theoretical simulation of synergic diffraction--------------- P 5 • Application to Speckle Lithography-------------------------- P 6 • Conclusion ------------------------------------------------------- P 9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Abstract Diffraction is a manifestation of light at edge due to its wavelike nature. The well-known diffraction phenomena are Fresnel and Fraunhofer, they find variety of applications individually. But the synergy of two phenomena is not studied and understood, which is important to understand the compound optical instruments. This research studies and demonstrates the synergic patterns of Fresnel and Fraunhofer diffractions. The combined diffraction resulted in
    [Show full text]
  • Laser Beam Pathway Design and Evaluation for Dielectric Laser Acceleration
    UPTEC F 19029 Examensarbete 30 hp Juni 2019 Laser Beam Pathway Design and Evaluation for Dielectric Laser Acceleration Karwan Rasouli Abstract Laser Beam Pathway Design and Evaluation for Dielectric Laser Acceleration Karwan Rasouli Teknisk- naturvetenskaplig fakultet UTH-enheten After nearly 100 years of particle acceleration, particle accelerator experiments continue providing results within the field of high Besöksadress: energy physics. Particle acceleration is used worldwide in practical Ångströmlaboratoriet Lägerhyddsvägen 1 applications such as radiation therapy and materials science Hus 4, Plan 0 research. Unfortunately, these accelerators are large and expensive. Dielectric Laser Acceleration (DLA) is a promising technique for Postadress: accelerating particles with high acceleration gradients, without Box 536 751 21 Uppsala requiring large-scale accelerators. DLA utilizes the electric field of a high energy laser to accelerate electrons in the proximity of a Telefon: nanostructured dielectric surface. 018 – 471 30 03 The aim of this project was limited to laser beam routing and imaging Telefax: techniques for a DLA experiment. The goal was to design the laser 018 – 471 30 00 beam pathway between the laser and the dielectric sample, and testing a proposed imaging system for aiming the laser. This goal was Hemsida: achieved in a test setup using a low-energy laser. In the main setup http://www.teknat.uu.se/student including a femtosecond laser, the result indicated lack of focus. For a full experimental setup, a correction of this focus is essential and the beam path would need to be combined with a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) as an electron source. Handledare: Mathias Hamberg, Pontus Forsberg Ämnesgranskare: Mikael Karlsson Examinator: Tomas Nyberg ISSN: 1401-5757, UPTEC F 19029 Popular Summary Particle acceleration experiments began in the early 20th century and have since become an important tool in high energy physics and applications in for example medicine and materials science.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaussian Content As a Laser Beam Quality Parameter
    Gaussian Content as a Laser Beam Quality Parameter Shlomo Ruschin,1,2 Elad Yaakobi 2 and Eyal Shekel 2 1 Department of Physical Electronics, School of Electrical Engineering Faculty of Engineering, Tel-Aviv University,Tel-Aviv 69978 Israel 2 Civan Advanced Technologies,64 Kanfei Nesharim street Jerusalem 95464, Israel *Corresponding author: [email protected] We propose the Gaussian Content as an optional quality parameter for the characterization of laser beams. It is defined as the overlap integral of a given field with an optimally defined Gaussian. The definition is specially suited for applications where coherence properties are targeted. Mathematical definitions and basic calculation procedures are given along with results for basic beam profiles. The coherent combination of an array of laser beams and the optimal coupling between a diode laser and a single-mode fiber (SMF) are elaborated as application examples. The measurement of the Gaussian Content and its conservation upon propagation are experimentally confirmed. 1 1. Introduction The issue of characterizing the beam quality of a coherent beam has been a matter of study and discussion for more than two decades [ 1, 2]. Although several ways to characterize and evaluate the quality of coherent beams have been proposed, there is a widespread consensus that there is no single accepted beam quality parameter suitable for all applications and scenarios, and therefore, specific quality factors are often chosen by practical considerations and even "target oriented". Examples of established parameters [1] are the M 2 factor (or BPP-Beam Propagation Product related to it), the PIB ("Power in the bucket") and Strehl ratio parameters.
    [Show full text]