DOCSLIB.ORG

Redevelopment Value of Landholdings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

03 June 2013 Asia Pacific/Japan Equity Research Integrated Telecommunication Services (Telecommunication Services (Japan)) / OVERWEIGHT Nippon Telegraph and Telephone (9432 / 9432 JP) Rating OUTPERFORM* Price (31 May 13, ¥) 5,050 INCREASE TARGET PRICE Target price (¥) (from 4,700) 6,000¹ Chg to TP (%) 18.8 Market cap. (¥ bn) 6,682.15 (US$ 66.48) Redevelopment value of landholdings with Enterprise value (¥ bn) 8,987.52 Number of shares (mn) 1,323.20 area 28x the size of Tokyo Dome Free float (%) 50.6 52-week price range 5,550 - 3,295 ■ Value of NTT’s landholdings: Based on our research, we calculate that *Stock ratings are relative to the coverage universe in each together, NTT East and NTT West own property covering roughly 400,000 analyst's or each team's respective sector. 2 ¹Target price is for 12 months. tsubo (around 1.34mn m , or 330 acres), 28x the size of Tokyo Dome and double the size of Disneyland in California. Assuming it is used for Research Analysts redevelopment into offices, we put the value of this land at approximately Hitoshi Hayakawa ¥5.4tn. We raise our target price from ¥4,700 to ¥6,000 (potential return 81 3 4550 9952 18.8%) to reflect changes in our estimates and valuation assumptions, and [email protected] maintain our OUTPERFORM rating. ■ Urging management to make use of idle land: NTT East and West own a number of vacant buildings, a consequence of branch office consolidation. Not all are suited to redevelopment, as in some cases these buildings still feature telephone exchange equipment and wireless antennae. We are amazed, however, to find that this volume of idle land exists. From a shareholder's perspective, we think management at both companies should take action to utilize these properties. ■ Catalysts/risks: Catalysts include utilization of idle assets, share buybacks, dividend hikes, and cuts in capex. The main risks, in our view, are deteriorating profits at NTT East and NTT West as a result of weak demand for optical fiber, and a setback in management policy on shareholder returns. ■ Valuation: Our ¥6,000 TP references: (1) the ¥5,070 theoretical share price based on FY3/14E EPS of ¥507 and a 10x fair-value P/E derived in turn by multiplying the 10.4x sector-average P/E for the past two years by the 0.95 average for NTT’s sector-relative P/E over the same period (10.4 × 0.95 = 10x); and (2) a ¥6,474 price derived by valuing the company’s real estate assets. Implied P/E is 12x FY3/14E EPS. Share price performance Financial and valuation metrics Year 3/13A 3/14E 3/15E 3/16E Price (LHS) Rebased Rel (RHS) Revenue (¥ bn) 10,700.7 10,817.5 10,869.1 10,914.9 6000 120 Operating profit (¥ bn) 1,202.0 1,205.7 1,216.1 1,260.6 5000 110 Pre-tax profit (¥ bn) 1,201.1 1,268.4 1,218.8 1,263.2 4000 100 Net income (¥ bn) 524.1 588.5 554.4 574.0 3000 90 EPS (¥) 432.4 507.1 503.8 562.6 2000 80 Jun-11 Oct-11 Feb-12 Jun-12 Oct-12 Feb-13 Change from previous EPS (%) n.a. 16.4 15.6 IBES Consensus EPS (¥) n.a. 474.7 500.2 555.9 The price relative chart measures performance against the EPS growth (%) 17.9 17.3 -0.7 11.7 TOPIX which closed at 1135.78 on 31/05/13 P/E (x) 9.5 10.0 10.0 9.0 On 31/05/13 the spot exchange rate was ¥100.51/US$1 Dividend yield (%) 3.9 3.4 3.6 3.8 EV/EBITDA(x) 2.5 2.9 3.1 3.1 Performance Over 1M 3M 12M P/B (x) 0.51 0.62 0.62 0.62 Absolute (%) 5.9 17.4 49.2 ROE(%) 5.1 5.5 5.1 5.3 Relative (%) 7.4 2.6 -11.0 Net debt/equity (%) 22.1 21.4 23.1 25.3 Source: Company data, Thomson Reuters, IFIS, Credit Suisse estimates. DISCLOSURE APPENDIX CONTAINS ANALYST CERTIFICATIONS AND THE STATUS OF NON US ANALYSTS. US Disclosure: Credit Suisse does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the Firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES RESEARCH & ANALYTICS BEYOND INFORMATION® Client-Driven Solutions, Insights, and Access 03 June 2013 What is the value of NTT's unrealized gains on property holdings? Amid mounting interest in how Abenomics will affect asset values, we have been bombarded by enquiries from investors around the world as to the value of NTT's property holdings. We could think of only two possible responses to this query: (1) market value, based on securities filings; and (2) an amount based on property tax evaluations, as per verbal disclosure by NTT's director of finance at the analyst meeting. The item "investment property" in the notes to NTT's Annual Securities Report cites a fair Based on securities filings, value of ¥1,433.4bn at end-FY3/12. As the end-FY3/12 book value of these properties was unrealized gains on property ¥801.8bn, unrealized gains on “investment property” owned by the entire NTT Group amount to ¥631.5bn amount to ¥631.5bn. As suggested by the wording, the fair value of “investment property” applies only to land held for the purpose of leasing out; unrealized gains on such property account for just a portion of gains on NTT's broader property portfolio. It would be remiss of us to use this data alone to draw conclusions about unrealized gains on property across the entire NTT Group. Furthermore, of the ¥631.6bn fair value of “investment property,” the fair value of NTT Urban Development “investment property” owned by NTT Urban Development amounts to ¥411.5bn. In short, accounts for roughly 80% of "investment property" owned by other NTT Group companies has a fair value of only group's unrealized gains ¥220bn. Both NTT East and NTT West have a number of idle properties used neither for Purpose of this report is to investment purposes nor business. Without taking into account these (effectively "hidden") smoke out value of NTT assets, we do not get the complete picture of asset value across the entire NTT Group. East and West's hidden assets, absent from These hidden assets constitute former NTT branch offices and telephone exchanges, securities filings scattered around the country. Under the structural reform program the company embarked on in 2001, NTT East and NTT West have undertaken progressive consolidation of their branch offices. This has left several former branch office buildings empty. Neither NTT East nor NTT West has disclosed exact locations for the buildings meeting this description; their addresses had remained a mystery. We conducted our own research using Google Maps to identify or estimate addresses in 376 cases. We then took up the challenge of nutting out values for these properties. Nippon Telegraph and Telephone (9432 / 9432 JP) 2 03 June 2013 Figure 1: Number of properties owned in Tokyo, Nagoya, Osaka, Kyoto, Fukuoka, and elsewhere Area No. of properties Tokyo 23 wards 110 Nagoya 45 Osaka 89 Kyoto 34 Fukuoka 23 Others 75 Total 376 Total of 5 major areas 301 Source: Credit Suisse Nippon Telegraph and Telephone (9432 / 9432 JP) 3 03 June 2013 Land owned by NTT would cover 28 Tokyo Domes Redevelopment value of ¥5.4tn Let us start with our conclusion. Our findings show that between them, NTT East and NTT Landholdings are 28x the West have idle land (former branch offices and the like) covering an estimated 400,000 size of Tokyo Dome, double tsubo (around 1.34mn m2, or 330 acres). This is 28x the size of Tokyo Dome and double the size of Disneyland in the size of Disneyland in California. If NTT were to redevelop all of this land and put it on California the market as investment property, we calculate the total value would be around ¥5.4tn. Figure 2: Book value and market value assumptions for NTT’s real estate holdings (¥ bn) 8,000 6,869 7,000 6,000 1,433 5,000 4,000 3,000 5,436 2,000 1,384 1,000 802 0 582 Book value Market value Real estates for business Real estates for rent Source: Company data, Credit Suisse Figure 3: Overview of building areas and market value Site area Market value Monthly Site area CAP Rate (Tsubo = of properties rent fee (㎡) 3.3 m2/tsubo) (¥mn) (%) (¥/tsubo) Tokyo 23 wards 396,153 120,046 2,751,239 5.3 22,455 Nagoya 161,700 49,000 397,730 6.5 15,000 Osaka 319,400 96,788 785,622 6.5 15,000 Kyoto 63,661 19,291 135,707 6.0 12,000 Fukuoka 130,482 39,540 278,152 6.0 12,000 Others 267,849 81,166 570,979 6.0 12,000 Total 1,339,244 405,832 5,435,562 6.0 14,742 Total of major 5 areas 1,071,396 324,665 4,348,450 6.1 15,291 Source: Credit Suisse estimates Note: Rent fees are for rental as offices In calculating the market value of properties owned by NTT East and NTT West, we set individual cap rates and rents taking into account regional characteristics, with advice from Credit Suisse real estate analysts Masahiro Mochizuki and Atsuro Takemura.
Recommended publications
  • Meguro Walking Map

    Meguro Walking Map

    Meguro Walking Map Meguro Walking Map Primary print number No. 31-30 Published February 2, 2020 December 6, 2019 Published by Meguro City Edited by Health Promotion Section, Health Promotion Department; Sports Promotion Section, Culture and Sports Department, Meguro City 2-19-15 Kamimeguro, Meguro City, Tokyo Phone 03-3715-1111 Cooperation provided by Meguro Walking Association Produced by Chuo Geomatics Co., Ltd. Meguro City Total Area Course Map Contents Walking Course 7 Meguro Walking Courses Meguro Walking Course Higashi-Kitazawa Sta. Total Area Course Map C2 Walking 7 Meguro Walking Courses P2 Course 1: Meguro-dori Ave. Ikenoue Sta. Ke Walk dazzling Meguro-dori Ave. P3 io Inok Map ashira Line Komaba-todaimae Sta. Course 2: Komaba/Aobadai area Shinsen Sta. Walk the ties between Meguro and Fuji P7 0 100 500 1,000m Awas hima-dori St. 3 Course 3: Kakinokizaka/Higashigaoka area Kyuyamate-dori Ave. Walk the 1964 Tokyo Olympics P11 2 Komaba/Aobadai area Walk the ties between Meguro and Fuji Shibuya City Tamagawa-dori Ave. Course 4: Himon-ya/Meguro-honcho area Ikejiri-ohashi Sta. Meguro/Shimomeguro area Walk among the history and greenery of Himon-ya P15 5 Walk among Edo period townscape Daikan-yama Sta. Course 5: Meguro/Shimomeguro area Tokyu Den-en-toshi Line Walk among Edo period townscape P19 Ebisu Sta. kyo Me e To tro Hibiya Lin Course 6: Yakumo/Midorigaoka area Naka-meguro Sta. J R Walk a green road born from a culvert P23 Y Yutenji/Chuo-cho area a m 7 Yamate-dori Ave. a Walk Yutenji and the vestiges of the old horse track n o Course 7: Yutenji/Chuo-cho area t e L Meguro City Office i Walk Yutenji and the vestiges of the old horse track n P27 e / S 2 a i k Minato e y Kakinokizaka/Higashigaoka area o in City Small efforts, L Yutenji Sta.
  • Railway Lines in Tokyo and Its Suburbs

    Railway Lines in Tokyo and Its Suburbs

    Minami-Sakurai Hasuta Shin-Shiraoka Fujino-Ushijima Shimizu-Koen Railway Lines in Tokyo and its Suburbs Higashi-Omiya Shiraoka Kuki Kasukabe Kawama Nanakodai Yagisaki Obukuro Koshigaya Atago Noda-Shi Umesato Unga Edogawadai Hatsuisi Toyoshiki Fukiage Kita-Konosu JR Takasaki Line Okegawa Ageo Ichinowari Nanasato Iwatsuki Higashi-Iwatsuki Toyoharu Takesato Sengendai Kita-Koshigaya Minami-Koshigaya Owada Tobu-Noda Line Kita-Kogane Kashiwa Abiko Kumagaya Gyoda Konosu Kitamoto Kitaageo Tobu Nota Line Toro Omiya-Koen Tennodai Miyahara Higashi-Urawa Higashi-Kawaguchi JR Musashino Line Misato Minami-Nagareyama Urawa Shin-Koshigaya Minami- Kita- Saitama- JR Tohoku HonsenKita-Omiya Warabi Nishi-Kawaguchi Kawaguchi Kashiwa Kashiwa Hon-Kawagoe Matsudo Shin- Gamo Takenozuka Yoshikawa Shin-Misato Shintoshin Nishi-Arai Umejima Mabashi Minoridai Gotanno Yono Kita-Urawa Minami-Urawa Kita-Akabane Akabane Shinden Yatsuka Shin- Musashiranzan Higashi-Jujo Kita-Matsudo Shinrin-koenHigashi-MatsuyamaTakasaka Omiya Kashiwa Toride Yono Minami- Honmachi Yono- Matsubara-Danchi Shin-Itabashi Minami-FuruyaJR Kawagoe Line Musashishi-Urawa Kita-Toda Toda Toda-Koen Ukima-Funato Kosuge JR Saikyo Line Shimo Matsudo Kita-Sakado Kita- Shimura- Akabane-Iwabuchi Soka Masuo Ogawamachi Naka-Urawa Takashimadaira Shiden Matsudo- Yono Nishi-Takashimadaira Hasune Sanchome Itabashi-Honcho Oji Kita-senju Kami- Myogaku Sashiogi Nisshin Nishi-Urawa Daishimae Tobu Isesaki Line Kita-Ayase Kanamachi Hongo Shimura- Jujo Oji-Kamiya Oku Sakasai Yabashira Kawagoe Shingashi Fujimino Tsuruse
  • Map of Areas with Risk of Flooding Due to Overflow of the Shibuya

    Map of Areas with Risk of Flooding Due to Overflow of the Shibuya

    Map of Areas With Risk of Flooding Due to Overflow of the Shibuya, Furukawa Rivers of the Furukawa River System and Meguro River of Meguro River System and Nomikawa River of Nomikawa River System (building collapse due to bank erosion) 1. About this map 2. Basic information Location map (1) This map shows the areas where there may be flooding powerful enough to (1) Map created by the Tokyo Metropolitan Government collapse buildings for sections subject to flood warnings of the Shibuya, (2) Risk areas designated on June 27, 2019 Furukawa Rivers of the Furukawa River System and Meguro River of Meguro River System and those subject to water-level notification of the (3) River subject to flood warnings covered by this map Nomikawa River of Nomikawa River System. Shibuya, Furukawa Rivers of the Furukawa River System (The flood warning section is shown in the table below.) (2) This river flood risk map shows estimated width of bank erosion along the Meguro River of Meguro River System Shibuya, Furukawa rivers of the Furukawa River System and Meguro River of (The flood warning section is shown in the table below.) Meguro River System and Nomikawa River of Nomikawa River System resulting from the maximum assumed rainfall. The simulation is based on the (4) Rivers subject to water-level notification covered by this map Sumida River situation of the river channels and flood control facilities as of the Nomikawa River of Nomikawa River System time of the map's publication. (The water-level notification section is shown in the table below.) (3) This river flood risk map (building collapse due to bank erosion) roughly indicates the areas where buildings could collapse or be washed away when (5) Assumed rainfall the banks of the Shibuya, Furukawa Rivers of the Furukawa River System and Up to 153mm per hour and 690mm in 24 hours in the Shibuya, Meguro River of Meguro River System and Nomikawa River of Nomikawa River Furukawa, Meguro, Nomikawa Rivers basin Shibuya River,Furukawa River System are eroded.
  • Environmental Impact Assessment System of the Tokyo Metropolitan

    Environmental Impact Assessment System of the Tokyo Metropolitan

    㩷 㩷 㩷 㩷 㩷 Environmental Impact 㩷 㩷 Assessment System 㩷 㩷 of 㩷 㩷 㩷 the Tokyo Metropolitan 㩷 㩷 Government 㩷 㩷 㩷 㩷 㩷 㩷 㩷 㩷 㩷 An Environmental Impact Assessment (Environmental Assessment) system is 㩷 a framework to estimate and minimize the possible impact that a proposed 㩷 project will have on the environment. Prior to a decision being made on a major 㩷 development project, an environmental impact assessment (EIA) is conducted 㩷 to estimate and evaluate the likely influence the project may have on the 㩷 environment and review how to minimize the impact. The result of the assessment is made open to the public and comments are invited from local 㩷 residents and relevant municipalities. It is also reviewed from the expert’s point 㩷 of view. 㩷 㩷 Pollution and loss of the natural environment may impair people’s health and 㩷 comfort. Sometimes it is difficult to restore the original natural environment. To 㩷 preserve a sound natural environment, it is important to put proactive and 㩷 preventive measures into effect, including the EIA system. 㩷 Since October 1981, the Tokyo Metropolitan Government has implemented 㩷 environmental impact assessment procedures before making decisions on 㩷 projects larger than a certain scale, in accordance with the Tokyo Metropolitan 㩷 Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance. The procedures are designed to 㩷 ensure that such projects incorporate reasonable considerations on the 㩷 prevention of pollution, preservation of the natural and historical environment, 㩷 and maintenance of the landscape. 㩷 㩷 In July 2002, TMG revised the ordinance to specify that an environmental impact assessment procedure must be followed in the planning phase for 㩷 projects larger than a specified scale.
  • Notice Concerning the Acquisition of Property

    Notice Concerning the Acquisition of Property

    Translation Purposes Only September 26, 2018 To All Concerned Parties Name of REIT Issuer: Hulic Reit, Inc. 2-26-9 Hatchobori, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan Eiji Tokita, Executive Officer (TSE Code: 3295) Contact: Asset Management Company Hulic Reit Management Co., Ltd. Eiji Tokita, President and CEO Person to Contact: Kazuaki Chokki, Director, General Manager of Corporate Planning and Administration Department Tel: +81-3-6222-7250 Notice concerning the Acquisition of Property TOKYO, September 26, 2018 – Hulic Reit, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Hulic Reit”) hereby announces that Hulic Reit Management Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Hulic Reit Management”), which is entrusted with the management of the assets of Hulic Reit, has today made the decision to acquire the property listed below (hereinafter referred to as the “Property”). 1. Overview of the acquisition (1) Category Tokyo Commercial Property (Office) (2) Property name KSS Gotanda Building (3) Location Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo (4) Assets planned for acquisition Real estate (5) Anticipated acquisition price 3,450 million yen (Note 1) (6) Date of purchase and sale agreement September 26, 2018 (7) Anticipated acquisition date October 1, 2018 (Note 2) (8) Seller Undisclosed (Note 3) (9) Acquisition funds Borrowings (Note 4) and cash on hand (10) Settlement method Full payment upon delivery Notes: 1. “Anticipated acquisition price” does not include consumption or local taxes or the costs and expenses related to the acquisition. 2. “Anticipated acquisition date” is the anticipated date of acquisition stated in the relevant purchase and sale agreement. 3. “Seller” is a general company in Japan. However, we have not received consent from the seller to disclose its identity.
  • Financial Instruments Intermediary Service Providers As of August 31, 2021

    Financial Instruments Intermediary Service Providers As of August 31, 2021

    Financial Instruments Intermediary Service Providers As of August 31, 2021 Jurisdiction Registration numbers Name JCN Address Telephone Affiliation financial instruments firm Hokkaido Local Finance Ace Securities Co., Ltd. Hokkaido Local Finance Bureau(FIISP) No.8 Masanori Watari（Financial Partners) － 4-5,Kamedamachi,Hakodate-shi, Hokkaido 0138-76-1692 Bureau Superfund Japan Co., Ltd. Hokkaido Local Finance Bureau(FIISP) No.26 Crest Consulting 4430001031195 324-46, Shinkou-cho, Otaru-shi, Hokkaido 011-231-5888 SBI Securities Co., Ltd. au Kabucom Hokkaido Local Finance Bureau(FIISP) No.30 JACCS CO., LTD. 2440001001001 2-5, Wakamatsu-cho, Hakodate-shi, Hokkaido 0138-26-4136 Securities Co., Ltd. Akatsuki Securities,Inc. Hokkaido Local Finance Bureau(FIISP) No.40 Yoshiko Ishii（Akashiya Kikaku） － 1-10-104, Minami12-jo Nishi23-chome, Chuo-ku, Sapporo-shi, Hokkaido 011-561-6596 Ace Securities Co., Ltd. Hokkaido Local Finance Bureau(FIISP) No.43 Hokkaidousougoukeieikennkyuusyo Co., Ltd. 5430001007434 4-3, Minami12-jo Nishi15-chome, Chuo-ku, Sapporo-shi, Hokkaido 011-551-7050 SBI Securities Co., Ltd. Hokkaido Local Finance Bureau(FIISP) No.44 Hadashi Company Limited 8430001029896 1-28, Kita4-jo Nishi12-chome, Chuo-ku, Sapporo-shi, Hokkaido 011-219-1955 Ace Securities Co., Ltd. Hokkaido Local Finance Bureau(FIISP) No.46 Financialfacilitators Company Limited 4430001046292 2-5-102, Minami3-jo Nishi25-chome, Chuo-ku, Sapporo-shi, Hokkaido 011-215-7901 Ace Securities Co., Ltd. Hokkaido Local Finance Bureau(FIISP) No.47 Ogawa Kazuya(Mclinic) － 6-10-6, Kita27-jo Nishi11-chome, Kita-ku, Sapporo-shi, Hokkaido 090-6999-0417 Ace Securities Co., Ltd. Hokkaido Local Finance Bureau(FIISP) No.52 Shigeki Sasaki － 1-15, Kita1-jo Nishi7-chome, Chuo-ku, Sapporo-shi, Hokkaido 011-596-9817 Ace Securities Co., Ltd.
  • Exploring Japanese Culture In

    Exploring Japanese Culture In

    JR Yamanote Line Suginami Ward Ikebukuro Kami Shimo Igusa Iogi Igusa Route Seibu-Shinjuku Line Chart JR Chuo Sobu Line 80min Narita Express Nishi Shinjuku Mitaka Kichijoji Ogikubo Ogikubo Asagaya Koenji Nakano NARITA Kugayama Minami Shin Higashi AIRPORT Asagaya Koenji Koenji Tokyo Metro Attention: JR Line Fujimigaoka Marunouchi Line 35min Keio Inokashira Keio Line Shibuya Limousine bus Chuo line express Line It does not stop at Koenji, Asagaya, or Nishi-Ogikubo Takaido Hamada Stations on weekends & holidays. -yama Nishi HANEDA Eifuku Eifuku Chuo Sobu line local Cho Meidai AIRPORT It stops at all stations unless terminating at Nakano. -mae Due to COVID-19, opening hours of stores may dier. We recommend checking their latest information before visiting. Suginami The information in this booklet is accurate as of March Map 2021. Ogikubo P28 Physical Space Academy Ogikubo Tokyo Metro Marunouchi Line 2 3 Kosugi-Yu Open hours: 15:30-1:45 * On Saturday and Sunday, 8:00-1:45 Closed on Thursday Address: 3-32-2, Koenji-Kita, Suginami Web: https://kosugiyu.co.jp/ Twitter: @kosugiyu Instagram: @kosugiyu_sento Facebook: @kosugiyu Tamano-Yu Open hours: 15:00-1:00 Closed on Monday and Tuesday Address: 1-13-7, Asagaya-Kita, * Standard Tokyo sento fee: ￥470 for an adult, ￥180 for up to12yrs, Sento - Public Bathhouse ￥80 for up to 6yrs The history of sento, public bathhouses, goes as far back It has been said that various other subjects were taboo, as the 6th century, originating as part of temple culture in such as monkeys (” saru” in Japanese, a homonym for the Japan.
  • JRA Volume 111 Issue 2 Cover and Back Matter

    JRA Volume 111 Issue 2 Cover and Back Matter

    ROYAL ASIATIC SOCIETY OF GREAT BRITAIN & IRELAND (FOUNDED MARCH, 1823) LIST OF FELLOWS, LIBRARY ASSOCIATES AND SUBSCRIBERS 1979 PUBLISHED BY THE SOCIETY 56 QUEEN ANNE STREET LONDON W1M 9LA Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.35.229, on 28 Sep 2021 at 11:09:51, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0035869X00135518 56 QUEEN ANNE STREET, LONDON, W1M 9LA (Tel: 01-935 8944) Patron HER MOST EXCELLENT MAJESTY THE QUEEN Vice-Patron HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS THE PRINCE OF WALES Honorary Vice-Presidents 1963 PROFESSOR SIR RALPH L. TURNER, MC 1976 PROFESSOR SIR HAROLD BAILEY 1976 PROFESSOR E. J. W. SIMON, CBE COUNCIL OF MANAGEMENT FOR 1979-80 President 1979 PROFESSOR SIR CYRIL PHILIPS Director 1977 MR D. J. DUNCANSON, OBE Vice-Presidents 1976 PROFESSOR E. H. S. SIMMONDS 1977 PROFESSOR K. A. BALLHATCHET 1978 MR E. P. SOUTHALL 1979 PROFESSOR C. F. BECKINGHAM Honorary Officers 1978 MR G. A. CALVER (Hon. Treasurer) 1977 MR N. M. LOWICK (Hon. Secretary) 1971 MR S. E. DIGBY (Hon. Librarian) 1979 DR A. D. H. BIVAR (Hon. Editor) Ordinary Members of Council 1978 MAJOR J. E. BARWIS-HOLLIDAY 1976 MR A. S. BENNELL 1979 MR R. M. BURRELL 1976 MR J. BURTON-PAGE 1979 MR A. H. CHRISTIE 1976 PROFESSOR C. J. DUNN 1977 MR J. F. FORD.CMG, OBE 1978 MR F. G. GOODWIN 1979 DR M. A. N. LOEWE 1976 MR P. S. MARSHALL 1979 PROFESSOR V. L. MENAGE 1977 MR B.W.
  • Organization and History ■

    Organization and History ■

    ■ Organization and History ■ Organization… …………………………………………… 74 Office Locations…………………………………………… 75 History of JFC……………………………………………… 80 JFC2020 73 Organization Organization Chart of Japan Finance Corporation Board of Directors Evaluation Committee Audit & Supervisory Board Advisory Council to the Governor & CEO Governor & CEO Personnel Committee Audit & Supervisory Board Members’ Office Corporate Governance Committee Deputy Governor ●Secretariat Planning and Micro Business and Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries Small and Medium Oce Administration Unit Individual Unit and Food Business Unit Enterprise (SME) Unit ●Promotion Oce for Diversity Business Promotion Sub-Unit Business Promotion Sub-Unit Business Promotion Sub-Unit ●Audit and Inclusion ●Business Promotion Department ●Business Promotion ●Business Promotion Department ●Personnel Department ●Loan Planning Department Department Department ●Corporate Governance Oce ●Business Start-Up Support ●Loan Planning Department ●International Operations ●Public Relations Department Department ●Information Planning Department ●System Audit ● (Branch) Micro Business and Department (Representative Oces) Oce Individual Unit, etc. ●(Branch) Small and Medium General Aairs and Planning Credit Sub-Unit Enterprise (SME) Unit, etc. Sub-Unit Environmental Health ●Credit Analysis Department ●Crisis Response ●General Aairs and Coordination Business Loan Sub-Unit ●Revitalization Support Credit Analysis Sub-Unit Finance Department Department ●Environmental Health Department ●Credit Analysis Management ●Corporate
  • Suginami Guide Book

    Suginami Guide Book

    SUGINAMI GUIDE BOOK Quick City Overview 1 2 Suginami City in Numbers Intention to Settle Find it Easy to Live Here Population 574,280 No. of Households 325,518 87.6% 96.1% * According to 2019 Suginami Population Pyramid 100+ City residential opinion survey 95～99 Male 90～94 Female 85～89 Suginami City 80～84 75～79 70～74 65～69 60～64 No. of Trees 55～59 35,914 50～54 45～49 40～44 1st 35～39 Cherry Blossom 5,945 30～34 Area ㎢ 25～29 34.06 20～24 2nd 15～19 Japanese Zelkova 5,373 10～14 5～9 0～4 3rd Ginkgo 3,499 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 0 5000 10000 15000 2000025000 (people) (people) * According to FY2017 Suginami City greenery fact- ¿QGLQJVXUYH\ 100+ 95～99 Male 90～94 Female Green Space Ratio 85～89 Japan 80～84 No. of Parks 75～79 ％ 70～74 327 21.77 65～69 *As of April 1, 2019 60～64 * According to FY2017 55～59 Suginami City greenery fact- 50～54 ¿QGLQJVXUYH\ 45～49 40～44 Park Area per Person 35～39 ㎡ 30～34 2.07 25～29 20～24 *As of April 1, 2019 15～19 10～14 5～9 0～4 The smallest 5000005 0004 0 000300340 20000200 10000100 010 00 10000 02000 002 300003 400004 5005000 （万人） As of（万人） October 2019 amount out of all Daily Amount of Garbage Generated per Resident 23 Special Wards for 8 years running! No. of Children Max. No. of Children Allowed to g/day Total Fertility Rate 466 (under age 15) enter the Certi ed Child Care Center *FY2018 No waiting list for childcare 60,323 1.03 12,080 since FY2018! * According to 2018 Tokyo *As of April 1, 2019 metropolitan demographic No.
  • Environmental Impact Assessment System of the Tokyo Metropolitan Government

    Environmental Impact Assessment System of the Tokyo Metropolitan Government

    Environmental Impact Assessment System of the Tokyo Metropolitan Government An Environmental Impact Assessment (Environmental Assessment) system is a framework to estimate and minimize the possible impact that a proposed project will have on the environment. Prior to a decision being made on a major development project, an environmental impact assessment (EIA) is conducted to estimate and evaluate the likely inuence the project may have on the environment and review how to minimize the impact. The result of the assessment is made open to the public and comments are invited from local residents and relevant municipalities. It is also reviewed from the expert’s point of view. Pollution and loss of the natural environment may impair people’s health and comfort. Sometimes it is difcult to restore the original natural environment. To preserve a sound natural environment, it is important to put proactive and preventive measures into effect, including the EIA system. Since October 1981, the Tokyo Metropolitan Government has implemented environmental impact assessment procedures before making decisions on projects larger than a certain scale, in accordance with the Tokyo Metropolitan Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance. The procedures are designed to ensure that such projects incorporate reasonable considerations on the prevention of pollution, preservation of the natural and historical environment, and maintenance of the landscape. In July 2002, TMG revised the ordinance to specify that an environmental impact assessment procedure must be followed in the planning phase for projects larger than a specied scale. 1 * e-mail. EAR. Opinions can be brought in personally or submitted bymail or the environment consideration report, the survey plan and the draft environmental preservation within acertain period of time, concerning Residents of may Tokyo submit opinions from the viewpoint of environmental assessment report (EAR).
  • Map of Areas with Risk of Flooding Due to Overflow of the Shibuya

    Map of Areas with Risk of Flooding Due to Overflow of the Shibuya

    Map of Areas With Risk of Flooding Due to Overflow of the Shibuya, Furukawa Rivers of the Furukawa River System and Meguro River of Meguro River System and Nomikawa River of Nomikawa River System (estimated high rainfall) 1. About this map 2. Basic information Location map (1) Pursuant to the provisions of the Flood Control Act, this map shows the (1) Map created by the Tokyo Metropolitan Government areas expected to flood and anticipated depth of inundation that can occur (2) Risk areas designated on June 27, 2019 when there is the level of rainfall used as a basis for flood control measures for sections subject to flood warnings of the Shibuya, Furukawa (3) Released as TMG announcement No.162 Rivers of the Furukawa River System and Meguro River of Meguro River (4) Designation made based on Article 14, paragraph 2 of the Flood System and those subject to water-level notification of the Nomikawa River Control Act (Act No.193 of 1949) of Nomikawa River System. (5) River subject to flood warnings covered by this map (2) This river flood risk map uses a simulation to show inundation that can Shibuya, Furukawa Rivers of the Furukawa River System occur due to overflow of the Shibuya, Furukawa Rivers of the Furukawa Sumida River (The flood warning section is shown in the table below.) River System and Meguro River of Meguro River System and Nomikawa River Meguro River of Meguro River System of Nomikawa River System resulting from the level of rainfall used as a (The flood warning section is shown in the table below.) basis for flood control measures with an annual exceedance probability of 1 percent.