DOCSLIB.ORG

Çanakkale Turizm Envanteri Ve Strateji Çalışması

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Çanakkale Turizm Envanteri Ve Strateji Çalışması T.C. ÇANAKKALE ONSEKİZ MART ÜNİVERSİTESİ TURİZM ENVANTERİ VE STRATEJİ ÇALIŞMASI ÇANAKKALE DESTİNASYONU HAZIRLAYANLAR Doç. Dr. Lütfi ATAY Doç. Dr. Murat AKSU Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Hacı Mehmet YILDIRIM Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Halil KORKMAZ TURİZM FAKÜLTESİ GÜNEY MARMARA KALKINMA AJANSI VE ÇANAKKALE ONSEKİZ MART ÜNİVERSİTESİ KURUMSAL İŞ BİRLİĞİ PROTOKOLÜ KAPSAMINA GÖRE HAZIRLANMIŞTIR. KATKILARINDAN DOLAYI ÇANAKKALE İL KÜLTÜR VE TURİZM MÜDÜRLÜĞÜNE TEŞEKKÜR EDERİZ. 1 TEMMUZ-2019 2 İÇİNDEKİLER İÇİNDEKİLER ........................................................................................................................................ 3 KISALTMALAR LİSTESİ ......................................................................................................................... 7 TABLOLAR LİSTESİ ............................................................................................................................... 8 ÇANAKKALE DESTİNASYONU ÖNSÖZ ............................................................................................... 9 1. ÇANAKKALE KENT MERKEZİ DESTİNASYONU ................................................................ 12 1.1. MERKEZ DESTİNASYONU .................................................................................................... 12 1.1.1. Doğal Çekim Unsurları ....................................................................................................... 12 1.1.2. Yapay Çekim Unsurları ....................................................................................................... 13 1.1.3. Çanakkale Merkez Ulaşım .................................................................................................. 17 1.1.4. Arz Verileri: ........................................................................................................................ 17 1.1.5. Talep Verileri: ..................................................................................................................... 18 1.2. ÇANAKKALE KENT MERKEZİ DESTİNASYONU GZFT ANALİZİ ................................. 19 1.3. ÇANAKKALE KENT MERKEZİ HEDEF ve STRATEJİLER ................................................ 21 2. ADALAR DESTİNASYONU ......................................................................................................... 23 2.1. GÖKÇEADA.............................................................................................................................. 23 2.1.1. Doğal Çekim Unsurları ....................................................................................................... 23 2.1.2. Yapay Çekim Unsurları ....................................................................................................... 25 2.1.3. Gökçeada Ulaşım ................................................................................................................ 26 2.1.4. Arz Verileri ......................................................................................................................... 27 2.1.5. Talep Verileri ...................................................................................................................... 27 2.2. BOZCAADA .............................................................................................................................. 28 2.2.1. Doğal Çekim Unsurları ....................................................................................................... 28 2.2.2. Yapay Çekim Unsurları ....................................................................................................... 29 2.2.3. Bozcaada Ulaşım ................................................................................................................. 32 2.2.4. Arz Verileri ......................................................................................................................... 32 2.2.5. Talep Verileri ...................................................................................................................... 33 2.3. ADALAR DESTİNASYONU GZFT ANALİZİ ........................................................................ 34 2.4. ADALAR DESTİNASYONU HEDEF ve STRATEJİLER....................................................... 36 3. ASSOS DESTİNASYONU.............................................................................................................. 40 3.1. AYVACIK.................................................................................................................................. 40 3.1.1. Doğal Çekim Unsurları ....................................................................................................... 41 3.1.2. Yapay Çekim Unsurları ....................................................................................................... 42 3.1.3. Ayvacık Ulaşım ................................................................................................................... 44 3 3.1.4. Arz Verileri ......................................................................................................................... 44 3.1.5. Talep Verileri ...................................................................................................................... 45 3.2. EZİNE ........................................................................................................................................ 45 3.2.1. Doğal Çekim Unsurları ....................................................................................................... 45 3.2.2. Yapay Çekim Unsurları ....................................................................................................... 46 3.2.3. Ezine Ulaşım ....................................................................................................................... 48 3.2.4. Arz Verileri ......................................................................................................................... 48 3.2.5. Talep Verileri: ..................................................................................................................... 48 3.3. ASSOS DESTİNASYONU GZFT ANALİZİ ............................................................................ 49 3.4. ASSOS DESTİNASYONU HEDEF ve STRATEJİLER ........................................................... 50 4. KAZ DAĞLARI DESTİNASYONU .............................................................................................. 53 4.1. YENİCE ..................................................................................................................................... 53 4.1.1. Doğal Çekim Unsurları ....................................................................................................... 53 4.1.2. Yapay Çekim Unsurları ....................................................................................................... 53 4.1.3. Yenice Ulaşım ..................................................................................................................... 54 4.1.4. Arz Verileri ......................................................................................................................... 54 4.1.5. Talep Verileri ...................................................................................................................... 54 4.2. BAYRAMİÇ .............................................................................................................................. 56 4.2.1. Doğal Çekim Unsurları ....................................................................................................... 56 4.2.2. Yapay Çekim Unsurları ....................................................................................................... 57 4.2.3. Bayramiç Ulaşım ................................................................................................................. 59 4.2.4. Arz Verileri ......................................................................................................................... 59 4.2.5. Talep Verileri ...................................................................................................................... 59 4.3. KAZ DAĞLARI DESTİNASYONU GZFT ANALİZİ ............................................................. 59 4.4. KAZ DAĞLARI DESTİNASYONU HEDEF ve STRATEJİLER ............................................ 62 5. GELİBOLU YARIMADASI DESTİNASYONU ......................................................................... 64 5.1. GELİBOLU ................................................................................................................................ 64 5.1.1. Doğal Çekim Unsurları ....................................................................................................... 64 5.1.2. Yapay Çekim Unsurları ....................................................................................................... 65 5.1.3. Gelibolu Ulaşım .................................................................................................................. 67 5.1.4. Arz Verileri ......................................................................................................................... 67 5.1.5. Talep Verileri ..................................................................................................................... 67 5.2. ECEABAT ................................................................................................................................. 68 5.2.1. Doğal Çekim Unsurları ....................................................................................................... 70 5.2.2. Yapay Çekim Unsurları ......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ioannis S. Chalkos the 1912 Ottoman Elections and the Greeks in the Vilayet of Adrianople
    Ioannis S. Chalkos The 1912 Ottoman elections and the Greeks in the Vilayet of Adrianople: A view from the Greek Archives. The Young Turk governments of the Ottoman Empire (1908-18) are widely considered as a part of the latter’s modernization process.1 The reforms, which had been initiated in the midst of the 19th century, were aiming at the homogenization of the society under the principle of Ottomanism. This was an effort of the Otto- man administrations to attract the loyalty of all their subjects to a new “Ottoman Nation” so as to block the centrifugal tendencies threatening the very existence of the empire.2 However, there was an inherent dualism in this concept of egalitarian- ism promoted through the reforms: the millet system, the old classification of the Ottoman subjects in semi-autonomous religious communities governed by their own law, was preserved and gradually secularized resulting in the stimulation of the separatist nationalist movements.3 Regarding the Greek-Orthodox communi- ties, the Bulgarian ecclesiastical schism of 1870 and the resulting Greco-Bulgarian dispute over Macedonia had strengthened the Greek character of the millet (Rum millet) while the Greek Kingdom was gaining increasing control over its in- stitutions.4 Still the road to an open rift between the Greeks and their Ottoman context was a long one. Developments were shaped and evolved in a changing social and polit- ical landscape which was dominated by continuity rather than specific turning points. The examination of the 1912 Ottoman elections presents an excellent op- portunity for the exploration of this landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Her Mevsim Ayrı Bir Güzelliği Sunan Çanakkale, Içinden Deniz Geçen Coğrafyasıyla Topraklarının Bereketiyle, Tarihi Ihtişamıyla, Antik, Doğal Ve Modern Bir Kenttir
    GİRİŞ Her mevsim ayrı bir güzelliği sunan Çanakkale, içinden deniz geçen coğrafyasıyla topraklarının bereketiyle, tarihi ihtişamıyla, antik, doğal ve modern bir kenttir. Çanakkale, yaklaşık 5000 yıllık geçmişi ile eğitim, kültür, tarih kenti olmanın yanı sıra Homeros'un İlyada'sındaki gibi antik kültür hazinelerinin destanlarla beslenip gerçekliğe ulaştığı büyülü tarihi mekanları bünyesinde barındıran önemli bir turizm kentidir. Eski çağlarda "Dardanel" ve "Helles Pontus" olarak anılan Çanakkale Ege ve Marmara bölgesinde topraklan bulunan 671 km kıyı şeridine sahip tarih ve coğrafyanın anlamlı bir şekilde buluştuğu güzel bir kentimizdir. I. TARİHÇE Eski çağlarda DARDANEL ve HELLESPONTOS olarak anılan, erken Bronz Dönemi'nden bu yana önemli bir yerleşim merkezi olan Çanakkale; Çanakkale Boğazı sayesinde Anadolu ile Avrupa ve Akdeniz ile Karadeniz arasındaki bağlantıyı sağlayan iki geçit bölgesinden biridir. Bu özelliği nedeniyle oldukça zengin bir tarihi vardır. M.Ö. 3000 yılında kurulan L Troia, M.Ö. 2500 yıllarında bir depremle yıkılmıştır. Bundan önce de yörede eski yerleşmelerin bulunduğu bilinmektedir. Dardanos kentinin I. Troia'dan önce kurulduğu düşünülmektedir. Kuruluş önceliği 100‐150 yıl kadardır. M.Ö. 1200'lerde kuzeyden gelen "deniz kavimleri"nin göçü ile bölgede ve Anadolu'da yazılı tarih açısından karanlık dönem başlamıştır. Bölge, M.Ö. 7. yüzyılda Batı Anadolu'da büyük bir güç haline gelen Lydia Krallığı'nın egemenliğine girmiş, M.Ö. 5. yüzyılda Perslerin gelmesiyle, Pers etkisi artmaya başlamış, M.Ö. 386 yılında Persler ve Spartalûar arasında yapılan "Kral Barışı" ile bölgede kesin olarak Pers egemenliği sağlanmıştır. M.Ö. 334'te Makedonya Kralı Büyük İskender'in Pers ordusunu Biga Çayı (Granikos) yakınlarında bozguna uğratmasıyla Anadolu'da Pers hakimiyeti gerilemeye başlamıştır. İskender'in Ölümünden sonra İskender'in komutanları bölgede iktidar mücadelesine girişmişlerdir.
    [Show full text]
  • The Local and Central Administration in Imvros/Imroz and Lemnos in the Early 19Th Century
    THE KOCABAŞIS AS INTERMEDIARIES?: THE LOCAL AND CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION IN IMVROS/İMROZ AND LEMNOS IN THE EARLY 19TH CENTURY FERYAL TANSUĞ* Studies concerning center-periphery relations and the Ottoman rule of the Mediterranean islands of Crete and Cyprus have been well debated. The particular experience of the smaller Aegean islands, ilke Chios, Samos, Patmos, Andros and Rhodes, under the Ottoman rule also began to be analyzed by scholars. Studies about these smaller Aegean islands demonstrated communication of the islanders with the central government through Muslim local authorities.' Contributing to such discussions, this paper focuses on the relationship between local intermediaries/ civil community leaders and islanders in Imvros2 and Lemnos,' two small northem Aegean islands. It hopes to give voice to the overlooked ordinary insular lives under the Ottoman rule in the middle of the 19th century. Assistant Professor, Faculty of Arts and Science, Bahçeşehir University, İstanbul/TURKEY, [email protected] Gilles Veinstein, "Les documents &mis par le kap udan paşa dans k fonds ottoman de Patmos," Do- ceuments de Tiavail du CETOBAC, no. 1, Les archives de l'insularite ottomane, ed. Nicolas Vatin and Gilles Veinstein, CETOBAC, Paris 2010, pp. 13-19; Michael Ursinus, "I iı lPatinians in Their Qııest for Justice: Eighteenth Century Examples of Petitions Subrnitted to the Kapudan Paşa," in ibid., pp. 20-23; Elia% Kolovos, "Ottoman Documents from the Aegean Island of Andros: Provincial Administration, Adaptation and Limitations in the Case of an Island Society (late 16th - early 19th century)," in ibid., pp. 24-7; Nicolas Vatin, Gilles Veinstein, Insularits ottomans, Maisonneuver & Larose, Institue Français d'etudes anatolien- nes, Paris 2004; Ali Fuat örenç, Takm Dönem Tarihimizde Rodos ve Oniki Ada [Rhodes and the Dodecanese], Doğu Kütüphanesi, İstanbul 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • New Custom for the Old Village Interpreting History Through Turkish Village Web-Sites
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University History Theses Department of History Spring 5-27-2011 New Custom for the Old Village Interpreting History through Turkish Village Web-Sites Musemma Sabancioglu Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses Recommended Citation Sabancioglu, Musemma, "New Custom for the Old Village Interpreting History through Turkish Village Web-Sites." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2011. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses/48 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NEW CUSTOM FOR THE OLD VILLAGE INTERPRETING HISTORY THROUGH TURKISH VILLAGE WEB-SITES by MÜSEMMA SABANCIOĞLU Under the Direction of Isa Blumi ABSTRACT It is estimated that there are 35.000 villages in Turkey, and a great number of them have their own unofficial web-sites created as a result of individual efforts. The individuals who prepare these web-sites try to connect with the world via the internet, and represent their past with limited information. Pages on these web-sites that are titled "our history" or "our short history" provide some unique historical, cultural, and anthropological information about the villager's life in rural area. This thesis examines amateur historians' methods of reinterpretation in
    [Show full text]
  • User's Guide of Turkish Straits Vessel Traffic Service
    REPUBLIC OF TURKEY MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF COASTAL SAFETY USER’S GUIDE OF TURKISH STRAITS VESSEL TRAFFIC SERVICE Table of Contents DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................... iv LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................... v LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................................... v 1 GENERAL...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Operation ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.3 Competent Authority .............................................................................................................. 1 1.4 Administration ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.5 TSVTS Authority ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.6 Services Provided ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Historical Background of Unknown Eastern Jews of Turkey
    Ökten, S. (2008). Yahya Kemal’in Rüzgârıyle Düşünceler ve Duyuşlar. İstanbul: Mukaddime, 2017, 8(1), 67-82 Ötüken. doi: 10.19059/mukaddime.300003 Özdalga, E. (2009). Tarihsel Sosyoloji. Ankara: DoğuBatı. Revânî, Revânî Divanı. Avşar, Z. (n.d). erişim http://ekitap.kulturturizm.gov.tr/TR,78396/revani-divani.html. Söylemez, F. (1995). Anonim Tevârih-i Âl-i Osmân (1481-1512). Yayımlanmamış An Overview of Historical Background of Unknown Doktora Tezi, Kayseri: Erciyes Üniversitesi SBE. Eastern Jews of Turkey Şentürk, A. A. (1999). Osmanlı Şiiri Antolojisi (1.bs.). İstanbul: YKY. i Tarlan, A. N. (1981). Edebiyat Meseleleri. İstanbul: Ötüken. Süleyman ŞANLI Topal, S. A. (2008). Celalzâde Salih’in Târih-i Sultân Süleymân Adlı Eseri. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi SBE. Topçu, N. (1998). Kültür ve Medeniyet (2.bs.). İstanbul: Dergâh. Tursun Bey. (1977) Târih-i Ebu’l-Feth, haz. M. Tulum. İstanbul: İstanbul Fetih Cemiyeti. Abstract: Since ancient times Mesopotamia and Anatolia were a home for the Jews. During the Roman and Byzantine period there were small Jewish Uzun, S. (2011). Aşkî (Üsküdarlı) Divan, Tenkitli Metin, Nesre Çeviri Ve 16. yy. communities known as Karaite and Romaniot in Anatolia. After the Osmanlı Hayatının Divandaki Yansımaları. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, foundation of the Ottoman State they continued to survive. Afterwards İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi SBE. Ashkenazim Jewish communities from central and Eastern Europe began Yahya Bey. (1977). Divan, haz. M. Çavuşoğlu. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi to immigrate to the Ottoman Empire in the fifteenth century. With the Edebiyat Fakültesi. deportation of Jews from Spain, Anatolia became new home for Yılmaz, N. (1995). Selmân Câmi‘u’l-Cevâhir.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MODERNIZATION of the OTTOMAN NAVY DURING the REIGN of SULTAN ABDÜLAZİZ (1861-1876) By
    THE MODERNIZATION OF THE OTTOMAN NAVY DURING THE REIGN OF SULTAN ABDÜLAZİZ (1861-1876) by DİLARA DAL A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies Department of Classics, Ancient History and Archaeology College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham April, 2015 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT The main focus of this study is to examine the modernization of the Ottoman navy during the reign of Sultan Abdülaziz, exploring naval administration, education, and technology. Giving a summary of the transformation of shipbuilding technologies and bureaucratic institutions of the Ottoman naval forces between 1808 and 1861, it analyses the structure of the Ottoman navy, its level of development in comparison to previous periods of time, and the condition of the vessels making up the naval fleet from 1861 to 1876. It also intends to evaluate the character of existing administrative structures at the outset of Abdülaziz’s reign in 1861 and the nature of subsequent changes, including structural reorganization of the Imperial Naval Arsenal, the Ministry of Marine, and the Naval Academy, as well as advancements in military training and seafaring; all within the context of the impact of these changes on the military, political, and economic condition of the Empire during the reign of Sultan Abdülaziz.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Tsunamis in the Sea of Marmara 1. Introduction
    ITS 2001 Proceedings, Session 4, Number 4-2 527 Historical tsunamis in the Sea of Marmara Yildiz Altinok1, Sukru Ersoy2, Ahmet C. Yalciner3,BedriAlpar4, and Ugur Kuran5 1Geophysical Engineering Department, University of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey 2Department of Geological Engineering, University of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey 3Ocean Engineering Research Center, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey 4Institute of Marine Sciences and Management, University of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey 5Earthquake Research Department, General Directorate of Disaster Affairs, Ankara, Turkey Abstract. The fact that a tsunami might occur as the consequence of a probable large-scale earthquake in the region is a popular subject. A recent coseismic tsunami in Izmit Bay caused by the Kocaeli earthquake on 17 August 1999 has once more emphasized this fact and how the knowledge of historical tsunamis is important. When the tsunamigenic potential of the Sea of Marmara is assessed, over 40 tsunamis have taken place during the course of an observational period of about 2000 years. The areas in which such waves have concentrated are Izmit Bay, Istanbul coasts, Gemlik Bay, Kapidag Peninsula, and Gelibolu coasts. The tsunami created by the Kocaeli earthquake in the Izmit Bay is the last example of tsunamis in Marmara. A study of the last and previous tsunamis in detail will shed some light on the subject. 1. Introduction The Sea of Marmara is a complicated tectonic basin positioned in the western part of the right lateral strike-slip North Anatolia fault (NAF) zone. The westward escape of the Anatolian plate along the NAF zone, with an annual slip rate of about 25 mm (Stein et al., 1996; Straub and Kahle, 1997), causes earthquakes in and around the Sea of Marmara.
    [Show full text]
  • Homer, Troy and the Turks
    4 HERITAGE AND MEMORY STUDIES Uslu Homer, Troy and the Turks the and Troy Homer, Günay Uslu Homer, Troy and the Turks Heritage and Identity in the Late Ottoman Empire, 1870-1915 Homer, Troy and the Turks Heritage and Memory Studies This ground-breaking series examines the dynamics of heritage and memory from a transnational, interdisciplinary and integrated approach. Monographs or edited volumes critically interrogate the politics of heritage and dynamics of memory, as well as the theoretical implications of landscapes and mass violence, nationalism and ethnicity, heritage preservation and conservation, archaeology and (dark) tourism, diaspora and postcolonial memory, the power of aesthetics and the art of absence and forgetting, mourning and performative re-enactments in the present. Series Editors Rob van der Laarse and Ihab Saloul, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands Editorial Board Patrizia Violi, University of Bologna, Italy Britt Baillie, Cambridge University, United Kingdom Michael Rothberg, University of Illinois, USA Marianne Hirsch, Columbia University, USA Frank van Vree, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands Homer, Troy and the Turks Heritage and Identity in the Late Ottoman Empire, 1870-1915 Günay Uslu Amsterdam University Press This work is part of the Mosaic research programme financed by the Netherlands Organisa- tion for Scientific Research (NWO). Cover illustration: Frontispiece, Na’im Fraşeri, Ilyada: Eser-i Homer (Istanbul, 1303/1885-1886) Source: Kelder, Uslu and Șerifoğlu, Troy: City, Homer and Turkey Cover design: Coördesign, Leiden Typesetting: Crius Group, Hulshout Editor: Sam Herman Amsterdam University Press English-language titles are distributed in the US and Canada by the University of Chicago Press. isbn 978 94 6298 269 7 e-isbn 978 90 4853 273 5 (pdf) doi 10.5117/9789462982697 nur 685 © Günay Uslu / Amsterdam University Press B.V., Amsterdam 2017 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities for Tourism and Dialogue Between Civilisations
    Caliskan – Rums’ Fairs OPPORTUNITIES FOR TOURISM AND DIALOGUE BETWEEN CIVILISATIONS Rums’ Religious Fairs on the Islands of Gökçeada (Imbros) and Bozcaada (Tenedos), Turkey VEDAT ÇALI!KAN Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University <[email protected]> In the depths of the sea on the cliff Between Tenedos and craggy Imbros There is a cave, wide gaping Poseidon who made the earth tremble Stopped the horses there. Homer- Iliad Abstract This study concerns religious fairs that, in Turkey, are mainly limited to the islands of Gökçeada and Bozcaada. Continued by the resident Greek minorities (Rums), these traditional fairs attract the interest of not only off-island Rum communities but also of the Turkish public in general. Recently, the fairs’ religious, social, and cultural aspects have developed economic and political dimensions. Besides providing new opportunities for faith tourism in these small-economy islands, the fairs also prepare the ground for cultural and economic partnerships between Greece and Turkey. The cultural characteristics of Gökçeada and Bozcaada could set a global example for developing dialogue between civilizations. The centuries-old Greek Orthodox tradition of island fairs could function as a bridge between neighbouring civilizations today. These two Turkish islands in the North Aegean await the world’s interest and continue to contribute to positive relations between Greece and Turkey. Keywords Imbros (Gökçeada), Tenedos (Bozcaada), religious fair, faith tourism, dialogue between civilizations Introduction Located in the north of the Aegean Sea, the islands of Thasos, Samothrace, Limnos, Gökçeada (Imbros) and Bozcaada (Tenedos) are known as Bo!azönü, or the North Aegean islands. Of these, only Bozcaada and Gökçeada both belong to Turkey and are suitable for habitation.
    [Show full text]
  • Çanakkale Valiliği Çevre Ve Şehircilik Il Müdürlüğü
    T.C. ÇANAKKALE VALİLİĞİ ÇEVRE VE ŞEHİRCİLİK İL MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ ÇANAKKALE İLİ 2016 YILI İL ÇEVRE DURUM RAPORU HAZIRLAYAN ÇED VE ÇEVRE İZİNLERİNDEN SORUMLU ŞUBE MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ ÇANAKKALE-2017 1 ÇANAKKALE İLİ ÇEVRE DURUM RAPORU 2016 ÖNSÖZ Çevre ile ilgili sorunların çözümünde temel hareket noktası ise sorunların tespiti ve tanımlanmasıdır. Bu kapsamda, Çevre ve Şehircilik İl Müdürlükleri tarafından; çevre sorunları ile ilgili olarak, çevre mevzuatı çerçevesinde ekolojik sistemin korunması ve iyileştirilmesi, her türlü çevre kirliliğinin önlenmesi, doğal bitki ve hayvan varlığı ile doğal zenginliklerin korunması ve kamuoyunda çevre bilincinin oluşması için birçok kurum ve kuruluş ile işbirliği içerisinde çalışmalar sürdürülmektedir. Çevreyi korumak, çevre kirliliğini önlemek ve çevre sorunlarını, bunların önceliklerini ortaya çıkarmak için öncelikle çevre değerlerinin mevcut durumunun tespit edilmesi, çevreye ilişkin bilgi ve her türlü verilerin toplanması, sınıflandırılması ve verinin bilgiye dönüştürülmesi gerekmektedir. Bu gereklilikten yola çıkarak Çevre ve Şehircilik İl Müdürlükleri tarafından her yıl “İl Çevre Durum Raporları” hazırlanmaktadır. Hazırlanan Çevre Durum Raporunun; çevrenin korunmasında; hava, toprak, su ve gürültü kirliliğinin önlenmesinde, ilimize ait tarihi ve doğal güzelliklerin iyileştirilmesinde, bitki ve hayvan varlığının devamlılığında ve çevre bilincinin oluşturulmasında önemli bir rehber olacağı kanısındayım. İlimizdeki çevre bilincinin oluşmasında ve nitelikli bir çevrede yaşanmasına katkıda bulunacağına inandığım bu raporun
    [Show full text]
  • Çanakkale Tourism Investment Guide
    Study in Brief With its emerging economy, Turkey is becoming one of the most vibrant hubs in the global economy being able to offer many advantages to investors thanks to its geographical position, natural resources and qualified labor force. Based on its emerging economy and the benefits offered to investors, Turkey now ranks among the most popular countries in which to invest among global-scaled enterprises. Çanakkale is known for its ability to host sustainable eco-friendly investments, and for the many advantages on offer, such as a qualified labor force, land-air-sea transportation, its natural resources and its strategic location close to industrial hubs. The aim of this study is to promote the existing investment atmosphere in Çanakkale so as to increase its share of investments in Turkey, which has been a center of attraction in this regard. This guide provides a detailed analysis of the tourism sector in Çanakkale, providing data on the investment climate in tourism, while taking into account private sector sensitivities, and details the types of advantages offered investors in tourism in the province. Invest in Çanakkale In addition to this guide, prepared to promote the investment climate in the tourism sector in Çanakkale, investment guides prepared for the sectors of agriculture and livestock, industry and energy are also submitted for our esteemed investors’ information. The South Marmara Development Agency is able to offer support services to investors thanks to its technical infrastructure and expert staff, in addition to this guide, in order to promote the investment atmosphere in the region. It can also be considered a solution partner in terms of the investments to be made in Çanakkale.
    [Show full text]