Beaufort Sea (Sale 71) Syrrthess Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Beaufort Sea (Sale 71) Syrrthess Report Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Assessment Program Beaufort Sea (Sale 71) SyrrtheSs Report US. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration Office of Marine Pdlution Assessment - ----- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - -- . -- -- - - - DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR of Lbnd Management - - - - -- - -- -z - - - -- - - - --- I Proceedings of a Synthesis Meeting: BEAUFORT SEA - SALE 71 - SYNTHESIS REPORT Chena Hot Springs, Alaska - April 21-23, 1981 D. W. Norton and W. M. Sackinger, Editors J. G. Strauch, Jr. and E. A. Strauch, Technical Editors Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Assessment Program Juneau, A1 aska December 1981 United States United States Department of Commerce Department of the Interior Malcolm Baldridge, Secretary James E. Watt, Secretary National Oceanic and Bureau of Land Management Atmospheric Administration Robert F. Burford, Director John V. Byrne, Administrator Office of Marine Pollution Assessment R. Lawrence Swanson, Director NORTHERN ALASKA -100 200 300KM FRONTISPIECE The location of the Sale 71 area on the Alaskan Arctic coast. NOTICES This report has been reviewed by the U.S. Depart- ment of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Assessment Program Office, and approved for publica- tion. Approval does not necessarily signify that the contents reflect the views and policies of the Depart- ment of Commerce or those of the Department of the Interior. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administra- tion (NOAA) does not approve, recommend, or endorse any proprietary product or proprietary material men- tioned in this publication. No reference shall be made to NOAA or to this publication in any advertising or sales promotion which would indicate or imply that NOAA approves, recommends, or endorses any proprietary product or proprietary material mentioned herein, or which has as its purpose an intent to cause directly or indirectly the advertised product to be used or purchased because of this publication. PREFACE The Alaskan Beaufort Sea is an unforgiving OCS frontier region, where continued exploration, discovery, and extraction of petroleum seem nevertheless to be highly probable events. The Department of the Interior's Proposed Sale 71 is the second major lease sale in a series of Beaufort Sea sales, and it is scheduled to follow that of the December 1979--Joint State/Federal Lease Sale by either 38 or 34 months. Although it might appear that because their acreages adjoin (see Frontispiece), Sale 71 will face the same environmental problems as did the Joint Sale, this is not the case, because both environmental and management condi- tions differ markedly between the two lease sales. Sale 71 is scheduled to offer more acreage and to offer tracts farther offshore, with more dynamic and severe sea ice conditions. It will involve a large region unprotected by offshore natural barrier islands, and would comprise an area of marine ecosystems influenced by freshwater influx from the largest river on the Alaskan North Slope. As the Joint Sale followed a concerted field program by OCSEAP that began in 1975, up to five years' intensive investigations in the central portion of the U.S. Beaufort had been made by the time of the sale. There were also three OCSEAP synthesis meetings and reports devoted to the Joint Sale: Weller et al., 1977, Arctic Project Bulletin #15; Weller et al., 1978, Interim Synthesis Report: Beaufort/Chukchi; and Weller et al., 1979, Arctic Project Bulletin #25. The first two were comprehensive reports on the full range of disciplinary and interdisciplinary under- standing of the environments and environmental hazards in the nearshore Beaufort Sea. The third was an analysis of 13 scientific issues relating to proposed stipulations and regulations governing the Joint Sale. Virtually every one of the recommendations made by the OCSEAP scientific community was adopted in stipulatory or regulatory provisions by the State or the Federal lease sale managers. Part of the reason for the strong influence of the scientists on the Joint Sale was their having had a reasonable period to investigate the environments in and around the rather modest acreage of the Joint Sale. The State had first proposed to lease submerged lands in the Beaufort between 1975 and 1977, to prop up a sagging revenue forecast. In 1975, the first proposed five-year lease plan of the Department of the Interior under the accelerated leasing program known as Project Independence called for a Federal Beaufort sale in October 1977. When the sale date was rescheduled for December 1979, OCSEAP thereby had 26 extra months to con- duct pre-sale environmental assessments. Such fortuitous timing does not apply to Lease Sale 71. Compared to the 1979 Joint Sale, the Sale 71 schedule has required the scientific community to address four times the area in one-fourth the time with one- tenth the funding, Whether the sale is held in February 1983, as per the Uarch 1980 federal proposed schedule plans, or is held in October 1982, under the current (1981) proposed acceleration of leasing, only a single 30-day field program has been conducted for all of the western Sale 71 region, in Harrison Bay. Even this brief field program in 1980 would not have taken place without provision of $1 million of extra FY 80 funding by the BL)I shortly after the announced inclusion of Sale 71 in the five-year schedule in mid-fiscal year. If there had not been three previous synthesis meetings and reports devoted to the Beaufort Sea, or if the principal contributors to those proceedings had not been funded (hence still available) through 1981, the present synthesis would not have been possible, or at least it would have been of dubious quality. The Beaufort Sea Sale 71 Synthesis Report that follows represents our attempt to condense into one document the general synthesis of under- standing, scenarios for development of the area, and a scientific issues analysis document that were three separate exercises for the previous Joint Sale synthesis process. During the preparation of this report, there has been some uncer- tainty about the geographic scope of the material to be included, which we hope has been clarified. Some authors have chosen to restrict their contributions and discussions to Harrison Bay itself, because it makes up the main area and geographic focus of the western part of Sale 71. Never- theless, the Federal sale does extend east as far as the easternmost off- shore tracts of the Joint Sale, off Flaxman Island, which are being reoffered (Fig. P.1). Sale 71 will also be the first offering of tracts directly offshore of the Simpson Lagoon-Jones Islands system which OCSEAP has studied intensively and reported on elsewhere, NOAA/OCSEAP Final Reports, Biological Studies, Volumes 7 and 8, 1981. For reasons of economy of space, we have dealt with as much of the eastern Sale 71 area as possible by referring to already published materials. David Norton, William Sackinger, Synthesis Volume Editors - Figure P.1. Sale 71 Geographic names. GENERAL TABLE OF CONTENTS* Page Preface.............................................................. vii List of Figures ...................................................... x List of Tables ....................................................... xv Section I . Characterization of Sale 71 Environments................ 1 Chapter 1. Ecological characterization.................. 1 Chapter 2. Circulation in the Sale 71 area ............. 57 Chapter 3. Physical characteristics of the Sale 71 area........................................ 79 Section I1. Interdisciplinary process analyses. impact predictions. and issue discussions ............................... 115 Chapter 4 . Ecological processes. sensitivities. and issues of the Sale 71 region................ 115 Chapter 5. Pollutant behavior and trajectories ......... 137 Chapter 6 . Hazards .................................... 159 Chapter 7. Gravel sources and gravel management options 169 Appendix A Quasi-open water spill movement prediction .............. A-1 Appendix B Ice properties.......................................... B-1 Appendix C Seasonal ice morphology maps ............................ C-1 Appendix D Disposal and Drilling Wastes ............................ D-1 Appendix E Attendees. Synthesis Meeting ............................ E-1 Issue Discussions At-A-Glance I Test Structures................................................. 163 I1 Monitoring Ice conditions. ...................................... 165 I11 Biologically Sensitive Areas ................................... 127 IV Siting of Facilities............................................ 129 V Seasonal Drilling Restrictions .................................. 130 VI Sand and Gravel Borraw .......................................... 172 VII Causeways ....................................................... 172 VIII Disposal of Drilling Wastes ................................. 151. D-3 IX Spill Countermeasures ........................................... 152 X Fresh Water Supply .............................................. 131 XI Aircraft and Noise Disturbance .................................. 131 XI1 Lease Duration .................................................. 165 XI11 Long-term Monitoring ............................................ 132 XIV All-year Transportation Capability .............................. 165 *This is an abbreviated table of contents; a more detailed table is to be found at the beginning of each chapter.
Recommended publications
  • Insurance Report of Activity September 2016
    Insurance Report of Activity For More Information Contact the Appropriate Regional Director or the Office of Public and Congressional Affairs (703) 518-6330 September 2016 Office of Consumer Protection INSURANCE REPORT OF ACTIVITY - SUMMARY 9/1/2016 THRU 9/30/2016 SINGLE COMMON BOND EXPANSION MULTIPLE COMMON BOND EXPANSION Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem 1 1001 0 1 117 0 0 21 17,405 2 1001 100 2 204 0 4 39 17,049 3 0000 0 3 70 0 0 26 20,583 4 0000 0 4 66 1 7 19 129,883 5 1001 57 5 156 0 1 16 20,702 Total 3003 157 Total 613 1 12 121 205,622 % 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% % 97.9% 0.2% 1.9% COMMUNITY EXPANSION COMMUNITY CONVERSION Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem # Dup. Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem # Dup. 1 0000 00 1 0000 00 2 1001800,909 0 2 0000 00 3 0010 00 3 1001 48,0570 4 0000 00 4 0000 00 5 1001185,079 1 5 1001 362,895 1 Total 2012985,988 1 Total 2002 410,952 1 % 66.7% 0.0% 33.3% % 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% LOW INCOME COMMUNITY EXPANSION UNDERSERVED AREA Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem # Dup. Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem # Dup. 1 0000 00 1 0000 00 2 0000 00 2 0000 00 3 0000 00 3 4004 361,965 0 4 0000 00 4 1001 44,9160 5 0000 00 5 10011,647,249 0 Total 0000 00 Total 60062,054,130 0 % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% % 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Prepared by NCUA 11/16/2016 INSURANCE REPORT OF ACTIVITY - SUMMARY 9/1/2016 THRU 9/30/2016 Charter Conversions Insurance Applications NICU to Non CU Non CU FISCU to FCU FCU to FISCU NICU to FCU FISCU to
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Cam Craddock January 25, 2003
    An Interview with Cam Craddock January 25, 2003 with John Fournelle I was born in 1930 and grew up in the city of Chicago on the north side. In 1941 my parents moved out to Glen Ellyn, a suburb. I finished high school there and went to DePauw University in Greencastle, Indiana and graduated there in 1951. I’ve just had my 50th reunion a year ago. I was the first one in the family to attend college. My father had come at 17 from Scotland in 1921, and immediately went to work to support his family. My mother had grown up near Duluth, Minnesota, and had trained there as a nurse. My parents got married there in 1927. In 1928 they moved to Chicago, and in 1930 I came along. Actually I was an adopted child. They had been unsuccessful in having children of their Sept. 27, 1979: Speaking at the own, I came along and was available for adoption, and so they groundbreaking of Weeks II, Cam Craddock, decided to sign me on. Department Chair, front, with Lou Maher, I started out as a chemistry student. In high school I had Building Committee Chair, rear. been encouraged by a chemistry teacher to enter the (photo–department archives) Westinghouse Science competition. We manufactured plastics working afternoons and Saturdays. We didn’t win anything, but he whetted my interest in chemistry. So when I went to college that’s what I studied—until I made the mistake of taking a geology course. After comparing the merits of geology with that of quantitative analysis, titrating away in the lab on spring afternoons, I decided geology would be worth a try.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States
    Bulletin No. 226 . Series F, Geography, 37 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES V. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR BOUNDARIES OF THE UNITED STATES AND OF THE SEVERAL STATES AND TERRITORIES WITH AN OUTLINE OF THE HISTORY OF ALL IMPORTANT CHANGES OF TERRITORY (THIRD EDITION) BY HENRY G-ANNETT WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1904 CONTENTS. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL .................................... ............. 7 CHAPTER I. Boundaries of the United States, and additions to its territory .. 9 Boundaries of the United States....................................... 9 Provisional treaty Avith Great Britain...........................'... 9 Treaty with Spain of 1798......................................... 10 Definitive treaty with Great Britain................................ 10 Treaty of London, 1794 ........................................... 10 Treaty of Ghent................................................... 11 Arbitration by King of the Netherlands............................ 16 Treaty with Grreat Britain, 1842 ................................... 17 Webster-Ash burton treaty with Great Britain, 1846................. 19 Additions to the territory of the United States ......................... 19 Louisiana purchase................................................. 19 Florida purchase................................................... 22 Texas accession .............................I.................... 23 First Mexican cession....... ...................................... 23 Gadsden purchase...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • RTA Spanish System Map.Pdf
    Stone Amtrak brinda servicios ferroviarios 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Scott 13 14 Regional Transportation Sheridan r LaSalle desde Chicago Union Station a las er D 270 s C ent 421 Division Division Authority es 619 272 Edens Plaza Lake 213 sin ood u D 423 422 422 ciudades a través de Illinois y de los w B Clark/Division La Autoridad Regional de Transporte e Forest y Central 423 151 a WILMETTE ville s amie n r 422 800W 600W 200W 0 E/W P w GLENVIEW sin paradas entre Michigan/Delaware Estados Unidos. Muchas de estas Preserve 620 C 421Union Pacific/North Line3rd 143 eeha l Forest Wilmette e La Baha’i Temple Elm F oll a D Green Bay 4th Green (RTA) se ocupa de la supervisión Antioch hasta v Glenview y Stockton/Arlington (2500N) T Glenview hasta Waukegan, Kenosha i Elm lo n r 210 Preserve 626 bard Linden Evanston sin paradas entre Michigan/Delaware rutas, combinadas con autobuses de e Dewes b 421 146 financiera, del financiamiento y s Dea Mil Wilmette Foster 221 vice y Lake Shore/Belmont (3200N) R Glenview Rd 94 Hi w 422 Thruway, están conectadas con 35 i i-State Chicago Cedar El Centro 221 Rand v r 270 au Emerson sin paradas entre Michigan/Delaware Oakton T Central Hill de la planificación del transporte e National- Ryan Field & Welsh-Ryan Arena 70 147 r k Cook Co y Marine/Foster (5200N) ciudades de Illinois. Para obtener Comm ee Louis Univ okie Central 213 Courts k Central 213 Maple 93 Sheridan sin paradas entre Michigan/Delaware regional para las tres operaciones de College S Presence 422 Gross 201 Hobbie 148 206 C Hooker y Marine/Irving
    [Show full text]
  • Insurance Report of Activity
    Insurance Report of Activity For More Information Contact the Appropriate Regional Director or the Office of Public and Congressional Affairs (703) 518-6330 December 2016 Office of Consumer Protection INSURANCE REPORT OF ACTIVITY - SUMMARY 12/1/2016 THRU 12/31/2016 SINGLE COMMON BOND EXPANSION MULTIPLE COMMON BOND EXPANSION Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem 1 0000 0 1 100 0 0 16 8,390 2 0010 0 2 184 0 3 36 20,926 3 0000 0 3 138 1 5 43 85,453 4 0000 0 4 54 0 5 19 47,590 5 0000 0 5 136 0 0 14 57,712 Total 0010 0 Total 612 1 13 128 220,071 % 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% % 97.8% 0.2% 2.1% COMMUNITY EXPANSION COMMUNITY CONVERSION Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem # Dup. Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem # Dup. 1 1011184,065 0 1 20021,032,787 0 2 0000 00 2 0000 00 3 0000 00 3 0010 00 4 20025,351,672 0 4 0000 00 5 0000 00 5 0000 00 Total 30135,535,737 0 Total 20121,032,787 0 % 75.0% 0.0% 25.0% % 66.7% 0.0% 33.3% LOW INCOME COMMUNITY EXPANSION UNDERSERVED AREA Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem # Dup. Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem # Dup. 1 0000 00 1 1001 162,272 0 2 0000 00 2 0000 00 3 0000 00 3 0000 00 4 0000 00 4 0000 00 5 1001954,568 1 5 10011,647,249 0 Total 1001954,568 1 Total 20021,809,521 0 % 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% % 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Prepared by NCUA 1/18/2017 INSURANCE REPORT OF ACTIVITY - SUMMARY 12/1/2016 THRU 12/31/2016 Charter Conversions Insurance Applications NICU to Non CU Non CU FISCU to FCU FCU to FISCU NICU to FCU FISCU
    [Show full text]
  • Insurance Report of Activity
    Insurance Report of Activity For More Information Contact the Appropriate Regional Director or the Office of Public and Congressional Affairs (703) 518-6330 August 2017 Office of Consumer Financial Protection and Access INSURANCE REPORT OF ACTIVITY - SUMMARY 8/1/2017 THRU 8/31/2017 SINGLE COMMON BOND EXPANSION MULTIPLE COMMON BOND EXPANSION Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem 1 1 0 0 1 758 1 147 0 0 15 25,587 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 262 0 2 52 51,362 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 154 0 7 33 8,989 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 39 0 4 15 48,356 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 215 0 1 15 39,230 Total 1 0 0 1 758 Total 817 0 14 130 173,524 % 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% % 98.3% 0.0% 1.7% COMMUNITY EXPANSION COMMUNITY CONVERSION Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem # Dup. Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem # Dup. 1 3 00 31,986,472 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 21,341,052 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 32,899,688 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 1 351,380 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2 0 0 22,988,321 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 11 0 0 11 9,566,913 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 % 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% LOW INCOME COMMUNITY EXPANSION UNDERSERVED AREA Region Approved Denied Deferred # of FCU Pot Mem # Dup.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of Alaskan Geology
    BIBLIOGRAPHY OF ALASKAN GEOLOGY 1960 = 1964 ..................,.....................SPECIAL REPORT 24 Compiled by : CRAbViYFOR IDE. FRITTS and MILDRED E. BROWN Division of Geological Survey College, Alaska 1941 STATE OF ALASKA William A. Egan - Governor DEPARmNT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Charles F. Herbert - Commissioner DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVI3 James A. Williams - Director BIBLIOGRAPHY OF ALASWU GEOLOGY, 1960-1964 Compiled by Crawford E. Fritts and Yildred E. Brown College, Alaska 1971 SPECIAL REPORT 24 CONTENTS Page Introduction ................................. 1. Purpose. source and format ........................ 1 Serial publications ............................ 2 Other publishing media ..........................12 Miscellaneous abbreviations ........................14 Bibliography .................................15 Index ........... Absolute age ...... Areal geology ...... Earthquakes ....... Economic geology .... Engineering geology ... General subjects .... Geochemistry ...... Geomorphology ...... Geophysical surveys ... Glacial geology ..... Hydrogeology ...... Maps .......... Mineralogy ....... Paleoclimatology .... Paleontology ...... Petrology ........ Sedimentary petrology . Sedimentation ...... Stratigraphy ...... Structural geology ... Volcanism and volcanology \.leather ing ....... ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Quadrangles and major geographic divisions of Alaska referred to inthisreport ..........................iv Figure 1. Quadrangles and major geographic divieione of Alaeka referred to in this report INTRODUCTION PURPOSE,
    [Show full text]