Minutes of the 18Th Meeting of Sham Shui Po District Council (5Th Term) Under the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
(Translation) Minutes of the 18th Meeting of Sham Shui Po District Council (5th Term) under the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Date: 6 November 2018 (Tuesday) Time: 9:30 a.m. Venue: Conference Room, Sham Shui Po District Council Present Chairman Mr CHEUNG Wing-sum, Ambrose, BBS, MH, JP Members Mr CHAN Kwok-wai Mr CHAN Wai-ming, MH, JP Ms CHAN Wing-yan, Joephy (Arrived at 10 a.m.) Mr CHENG Wing-shun, Vincent, MH Ms CHOW Wing-heng, Zoé Mr CHUM Tak-shing (Arrived at 10:35 a.m.) Mr HO Kai-ming, Kalvin (Left at 3:55 p.m.) Mr KONG Kwai-sang (Arrived at 10:15 a.m.) Mr LAM Ka-fai, Aaron, BBS, JP (Arrived at 11:45 a.m.) Ms LAU Pui-yuk Mr LEE Tsz-king, Dominic (Left at 4 p.m.) Mr LEE Wing-man Mr LEUNG Man-kwong Mr LEUNG Yau-fong Ms NG Mei, Carman (Left at 1:40 p.m.) Ms NG Yuet-lan (Arrived at 9:35 p.m.) Mr TAM Kwok-kiu, MH, JP Mr WAI Woon-nam (Left at 1:40 p.m.) Mr WONG Tat-tung, Dennis, MH, JP Mr YAN Kai-wing (Left at 4 p.m.) Mr YEUNG Yuk (Arrived at 9:40 a.m.) Mr YUEN Hoi-man - 2 - Action by In Attendance Mr LEE Kwok-hung, Damian, JP District Officer (Sham Shui Po) Miss MAN Ka-wing, Kelly Assistant District Officer (Sham Shui Po) 1 Miss LUI Hiu-wei, Michelle Assistant District Officer (Sham Shui Po) 2 Ms CHAN Tsz-yee, Emily Senior Liaison Officer 1, Sham Shui Po District Office Miss LAU Sze-nga, Vivicia Senior Liaison Officer 2, Sham Shui Po District Office Ms CHAN Siu-ping, Daphne Senior Liaison Officer 3, Sham Shui Po District Office Mr TAM Kin-fai, Simon Senior Liaison Officer 4, Sham Shui Po District Office Ms WONG Mei-yee, Amy Police Community Relations Officer (Sham Shui Po District), Hong Kong Police Force Ms CHAN Wing-mee Deputy District Commander (Sham Shui Po), Hong Kong Police Force Mr LEE Wai-man, Raymond Chief Engineer/South 1, South Development Office, Civil Engineering and Development Department Ms CHAU Fung-mui, Wendy District Social Welfare Officer (Sham Shui Po), Social Welfare Department Ms LEE Shuk-ling, Agnes District Leisure Manager (Sham Shui Po), Leisure and Cultural Services Department Mr SUM Siu-hin District Environmental Hygiene Superintendent (Sham Shui Po), Food and Environmental Hygiene Department Mr WONG Lap-yan, Ivan Chief Health Inspector 1 (Sham Shui Po), Food and Environmental Hygiene Department Mr TSE Chick-lam Chief Manager/Management (Kowloon West and Sai Kung), Housing Department Miss AU Mei-lin, Rebecca Senior Housing Manager (Kowloon West and Sai Kung 2), Housing Department Miss PO Pui-man, Karen Chief Transport Officer/Kowloon, Transport Department Mr WONG Chi-tak, Keith Senior Transport Officer/Sham Shui Po, Transport Department Mrs YEUNG HO Poi-yan, Ingrid, JP Permanent Secretary for Education Mr CHAN Fu-man Principal Education Officer (Hong Kong and Kowloon), Education Bureau Ms KAN Hoi-yan, Amanda Chief School Development Officer (SSP), Education Bureau Secretary Ms HO Kam-ping, Jennifer Senior Executive Officer (District Council), Sham Shui Po District Office - 3 - Action by Opening Remarks The Chairman welcomed Members and representatives of government departments to the eighteenth meeting of the Sham Shui Po District Council (“SSPDC”) (5th term). He also said that Ms Daphne CHAN, Senior Liaison Officer 3 and Mr Simon TAM, Senior Liaison Officer 4 of the Sham Shui Po District Office (“SSPDO”) would attend the future meetings; Ms CHAN Wing-mee, Deputy District Commander (Sham Shui Po) of the Hong Kong Police Force (“HKPF”) would attend today’s meeting in place of Mr HO Kai-hin, Tony; Mr Keith WONG, Senior Transport Officer/Sham Shui Po of the Transport Department (“TD”) would attend the meeting in the afternoon in place of Miss Karen PO; Miss Rebecca AU, Senior Housing Manager (Kowloon West and Sai Kung 2) of the Housing Department would attend the meeting in the morning in place of Mr TSE Chick-lam. The Chairman also took this opportunity to thank Ms NG Suk-min, Senior Liaison Officer 3 who had been transferred out for her contribution to this District Council (“DC”) during her tenure. Item 1: Confirmation of minutes of the 17th meeting held on 4 September 2018 2. The minutes of the 17th meeting were confirmed without amendment. Item 2: Permanent Secretary for Education meets with Members of Sham Shui Po District Council 3. The Chairman, on behalf of SSPDC, extended welcome to Mrs Ingrid YEUNG, JP, Permanent Secretary for Education, and the representatives of the Education Bureau (“EDB”) accompanying her to the meeting. 4. Mrs Ingrid YEUNG said that (i) she was happy to visit SSPDC and meet with Members. She hoped that Members could express their views on education issues; (ii) the Current-term Government valued quality education and was willing to invest in the hope that education quality in Hong Kong could be enhanced. 5. Ms Amanda KAN, with the aid of PowerPoint, introduced the latest situation of Hong Kong’s education, including resources allocated to education by the Government, types of schools in Sham Shui Po District (“SSP District”), kindergarten (“KG”) education, primary and secondary education, major improvement measures in primary and secondary education, post-secondary education, vocational and professional education and training (“VPET”), as well as the way forward in education. 6. Mr Vincent CHENG raised the following views and enquiries: (i) he asked whether EDB would renovate or rebuild old school premises as both supporting facilities - 4 - Action by and space of old school premises were inadequate; (ii) the “Opening up School Facilities for Promotion of Sports Development Scheme” (“Opening up School Facilities Scheme”) encouraged schools to open up their facilities to sports organisations for holding sports activities. However, there was no pairing for any schools in the district. He enquired about the number of applications submitted by schools in the district and hoped that the Bureau could assist in pairing; (iii) parents reflected that the subsidies to poor students were inadequate under the $2.5 billion Student Activities Support Fund (“SAS Fund”). He enquired whether the Bureau would raise improvement proposal so that more students would benefit from it. 7. Mr WAI Woon-nam raised the following views and enquiries: (i) school premises in the district, such as SKH Kei Oi Primary School (“KOPS”), were relatively old. He suggested renovating old or vacant school premises (“VSP”) for use by the aforesaid school. He also hoped that the Bureau could follow up on inadequate supporting facilities in school premises in the district; (ii) many KGs in the district had to borrow community halls for holding graduation ceremonies. However, it was not easy to make a booking. He hoped that the Bureau could assist in this regard. 8. Mr Dominic LEE said that residents of Yau Yat Chuen hoped that school net 41 could cover Yau Yat Chuen. He pointed out that: (i) Yau Yat Chuen was located closer to schools in school net 41. Based on the principle of vicinity in allocating school places, Yau Yat Chuen should be covered by school net 41; (ii) Yau Yat Chuen was located at the junction of SSP District and Kowloon Tong District. Residents were confused by different delineation of boundaries by different Government departments and organisations; (iii) population in SSP District would increase substantially. If Yau Yat Chuen was covered by school net 41, it would alleviate the shortage of school places in the district effectively. 9. Ms Carman NG raised the following views and enquiries: (i) school social workers were relatively important to school children receiving pre-school education. She enquired whether EDB would consider providing social workers in KGs; (ii) she enquired whether free education would be extended to include pre-primary education; (iii) working families without hiring domestic helpers had a strong demand for day crèches and day nurseries. She hoped that the Bureau could keep an eye on the supply of such schools; (iv) public housing estates like So Uk Estate and Pak Tin Estate would soon be ready for intake. She hoped that the Bureau could make proper arrangement in advance to avoid toddlers to attend schools in other districts. 10. Mrs Ingrid YEUNG gave a consolidated response as follows: (i) The Bureau was committed to enhancing the facilities of school premises - 5 - Action by and had implemented large-scale School Improvement Programme, benefitting many schools. Following the completion of the Programme, the Bureau had also allocated resources to schools for emergency or routine repair, etc. Constrained by their sizes, some school premises were more suitable for reprovisioning. Since the supply of temporary school premises was limited, the reconstruction of school premises had to be conducted gradually. The Bureau would build new school or reprovision old school premises according to the demand in the district. (ii) Quality Education Fund (“QEF”) Steering Committee, in response to the recommendation of the Government, had set aside $3 billion for the setting up of the Dedicated Funding Programme for Publicly-funded Schools. All publicly-funded primary and secondary schools (including special schools), schools under the Direct Subsidy Scheme, and the KGs under the KG Education Scheme (“KG Scheme”) could apply for the fund through simplified procedures to launch school-based curriculum and student support measures, as well as relevant school improvement works and procurement of supplies. A total indicative value was set by QEF for each school for reference purposes only. The indicative value of projects from the KG sector was $500,000 and that of projects from the primary and secondary schools sectors (including special schools) was $2 million.