Macroevolutionary Dynamics of Dentition in Mesozoic Birds Reveal No Long-Term Selection Towards Tooth Loss

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Macroevolutionary Dynamics of Dentition in Mesozoic Birds Reveal No Long-Term Selection Towards Tooth Loss Journal Pre-proof Macroevolutionary dynamics of dentition in Mesozoic birds reveal no long-term selection towards tooth loss Neil Brocklehurst, Daniel J. Field PII: S2589-0042(21)00211-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102243 Reference: ISCI 102243 To appear in: ISCIENCE Received Date: 15 June 2020 Revised Date: 16 December 2020 Accepted Date: 25 February 2021 Please cite this article as: Brocklehurst, N., Field, D.J., Macroevolutionary dynamics of dentition in Mesozoic birds reveal no long-term selection towards tooth loss, ISCIENCE (2021), doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102243. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2021 Journal Pre-proof 1 Macroevolutionary dynamics of dentition in Mesozoic birds reveal no long-term 2 selection towards tooth loss 3 4 Neil Brocklehurst 1* , Daniel J. Field 2 5 1 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, UK 6 2 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, UK 7 8 *Lead Contact – Neil Brocklehurst, neil.brocklehurst@earth.ox.ac.uk 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Journal Pre-proof 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2 26 Summary 27 Several potential drivers of avian tooth loss have been proposed, although consensus remains 28 elusive as fully toothless jaws arose independently numerous times among Mesozoic avialans 29 and dinosaurs more broadly. The origin of crown bird edentulism has been discussed in terms 30 of a broad-scale selective pressure or trend toward toothlessness, although this has never been 31 quantitatively tested. Here, we find no evidence for models whereby iterative acquisitions of 32 toothlessness among Mesozoic Avialae were driven by an overarching selective trend. 33 Instead, our results support modularity among jaw regions underlying heterogeneous tooth 34 loss patterns, and indicate a substantially later transition to complete crown bird edentulism 35 than previously hypothesized (~ 90 MYA). We show that patterns of avialan tooth loss 36 adhere to Dollo’s law and suggest that the exclusive survival of toothless birds to the present 37 represents lineage-specific selective pressures, irreversibility of tooth loss, and the filter of 38 the K–Pg mass extinction. 39 40 Key Words 41 Birds; Teeth; Edentulism; Dollo’s Law; Phylogenetic Comparative Methods 42 43 Introduction Journal Pre-proof 44 The toothless beak is among the most characteristic features of the crown bird 45 bauplan, and toothlessness has been hypothesised to increase the evolvability of crown bird 46 jaws, partially underlying their sensational morphological disparity (Louchart & Viriot, 47 2011). Numerous potential drivers of avialan tooth loss have been proposed, including 48 selection for flight-related weight reduction (Diliger, 1957; Feduccia, 1998; Proctor & Lynch, 49 1998) (though see [Zhou et al., 2019; Lautenschlager et al., 2013]), selection for rapid 50 developmental rates precluding tooth formation (Yang & Sander, 2018), dietary shifts 2 51 favouring alternative modes of food processing (Louchart & Viriot, 2011; Lautenschalger et 52 al. 2013; Wang et al., 2017; Ksepka, et al. 2019), and selection for preening efficacy (Naish 53 2014; Mayr 2016). However, consensus remains elusive, as fully toothless jaws arose 54 independently numerous times among Mesozoic avialans and dinosaurs more broadly 55 (Louchart, A. & Viriot, L. 2011; Dilger, 1957). 56 The origin of crown bird edentulism has been discussed in terms of a trend or 57 selection toward toothlessness (Dilger, 1957; Zhou et al. 2019; Lautenschlager et al., 2013; 58 Yang & Sander, 2018), implying an overarching selective pressure favouring edentulism 59 throughout avialan evolutionary history as opposed to localised selection acting on subsidiary 60 lineages as interpreted in other studies (O’Connor, 2019; 2020). For example, Zhou et al. 61 (2019) justified their assumption of overarching selection favouring tooth loss in Avialae on 62 the basis that it evolved numerous times independently: “Tooth loss occurred independently 63 in several early avian lineages (Zhou and Zhang, 2006; Zhou et al., 2009; Davit-Béal et al., 64 2009), suggesting that reduction and eventual disappearance of the dentition might have 65 conferred some broadly applicable selective advantage” (Zhou et al., 2019, pg 39). However, 66 no studies had previously tested whether avialan edentulism was associated with increased 67 rates of diversification (i.e. higher speciation rates and/or lower extinction rates), as would be 68 predicted by overarchingJournal directional selection forPre-proof a toothless bill through the Mesozoic, nor 69 had they evaluated whether patterns of tooth loss across Avialae actually follow trend-like 70 patterns. Such an interpretation does not align with other clades in which edentulism has 71 arisen numerous times independently, such as crown mammals (Davit-Béal et al. 2019), 72 which have never been suggested to exhibit a generalised trend toward edentulism. 73 The hypothesis of long-term selection or a trend toward edentulism in Avialae can be 74 tested in two ways: identifying a shift in diversification rates associated with tooth loss could 75 indicate selection for toothlessness on a broad phylogenetic scale [Jablonski, 2008; Rabosky 2 76 & McCune, 2010), while demonstrating that regional losses of teeth within the jaws are more 77 likely to lead to further losses of teeth would support the progression of edentulism 78 throughout the jaws in a trend-like manner. We apply state-dependent diversification methods 79 and evolutionary modelling to show that tooth loss had a negligible impact on avialan 80 diversification, providing no evidence for a link between toothlessness and accelerated 81 cladogenesis. We also found no evidence for models whereby iterative acquisitions of 82 toothlessness among Mesozoic Avialae were driven by an overarching selective trend. 83 84 Results and Discussion 85 No Long-Term Selection Toward Toothlessness in Avialae 86 State-dependent diversification (SDD) methods (FiSSE [Rabosky & Goldberg, 2017)] 87 and HiSSE [Beaulieu & O’Meara, 2016]) reject the hypothesis that edentulism provided a 88 selective advantage throughout the evolutionary history of Avialae (operationally defined 89 here as the clade uniting Archaeopteryx and crown birds). Speciation rates inferred by FiSSE 90 were higher in toothed avialans than in toothless avialans (Fig.1a). However, these 91 differences were never significant (p<0.05), implying that diversification rates were not 92 substantially affected by the presence or absence of teeth (Supplementary Table 2). HiSSE 93 analyses fit a null model Journalbetter than a state-depen Pre-proofdent model, suggesting that avialan patterns 94 of speciation and extinction were unrelated to tooth loss (Fig 1b). These results are consistent 95 when considering transitions to complete toothlessness, as well as transitions to regional 96 edentulism in the premaxilla, maxilla, and dentary (Supplementary figs 1-6). We confirmed 97 that these results are not an artefact of incomplete sampling with a taxonomic jackknifing 98 approach (Close et al., 2015). Although the range of rate values and Akaike weight scores are 99 greater in jackknifed datasets, we still obtained overwhelming support for a null model over a 2 100 trait-dependant model of diversification (Supplementary Fig. 7) and found no significant 101 difference between speciation rates of toothed vs toothless taxa (Supplementary Fig 8). 102 We also found no evidence for a general trend toward edentulism throughout avialan 103 evolutionary history. Loss of teeth in one region of the upper jaw (e.g., premaxilla) did not 104 increase the likelihood of tooth loss in another region of the jaw (e.g., maxilla), and vice 105 versa. Instead, model fits supported the premaxilla and maxilla as discrete modules with 106 largely independent trajectories with respect to tooth loss and tooth retention (Fig. 2a), which 107 is understandable in light of the differing populations of primordia, tissues, and cells from 108 which these elements arise (Helm & Schneider 2003, Schneider & Helms 2003; Wang et al. 109 2020a). The independent patterns of tooth loss in the premaxilla and maxilla provide 110 evidence against strong directional selection driving transitions to toothlessness across 111 avialans. While there are several instances of tooth-loss in the premaxilla coinciding with that 112 in the maxilla (e.g., Confucuisornithidae, Gobipteryx , Schizooura ), there are also numerous 113 instances where the evolution of toothlessness in one region occurred independently of the 114 other (e.g., Jeholornis , Longipterygidae), or where the evolution of toothlessness in one 115 region preceded that in the other by more than 30 million years (Ornithurae). These 116 idiosyncratic patterns, combined with the results of our model-fitting analyses, indicate that 117 transitions toward regionalJournal or complete tooth loss Pre-proof in Avialae reflect lineage-specific patterns,
Recommended publications
  • Anchiornis and Scansoriopterygidae
    SpringerBriefs in Earth System Sciences SpringerBriefs South America and the Southern Hemisphere Series Editors Gerrit Lohmann Lawrence A. Mysak Justus Notholt Jorge Rabassa Vikram Unnithan For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/10032 Federico L. Agnolín · Fernando E. Novas Avian Ancestors A Review of the Phylogenetic Relationships of the Theropods Unenlagiidae, Microraptoria, Anchiornis and Scansoriopterygidae 1 3 Federico L. Agnolín “Félix de Azara”, Departamento de Ciencias Naturales Fundación de Historia Natural, CEBBAD, Universidad Maimónides Buenos Aires Argentina Fernando E. Novas CONICET, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia” Buenos Aires Argentina ISSN 2191-589X ISSN 2191-5903 (electronic) ISBN 978-94-007-5636-6 ISBN 978-94-007-5637-3 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5637-3 Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London Library of Congress Control Number: 2012953463 © The Author(s) 2013 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinosaur Incubation Periods Directly Determined from Growth-Line Counts in Embryonic Teeth Show Reptilian-Grade Development
    Dinosaur incubation periods directly determined from growth-line counts in embryonic teeth show reptilian-grade development Gregory M. Ericksona,1, Darla K. Zelenitskyb, David Ian Kaya, and Mark A. Norellc aDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4295; bDepartment of Geoscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 1N4; and cDivision of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024 Edited by Neil H. Shubin, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, and approved December 1, 2016 (received for review August 17, 2016) Birds stand out from other egg-laying amniotes by producing anatomical, behavioral and eggshell attributes of birds related to relatively small numbers of large eggs with very short incubation reproduction [e.g., medullary bone (32), brooding (33–36), egg- periods (average 11–85 d). This aspect promotes high survivorship shell with multiple structural layers (37, 38), pigmented eggs (39), by limiting exposure to predation and environmental perturba- asymmetric eggs (19, 40, 41), and monoautochronic egg pro- tion, allows for larger more fit young, and facilitates rapid attain- duction (19, 40)] trace back to their dinosaurian ancestry (42). For ment of adult size. Birds are living dinosaurs; their rapid development such reasons, rapid avian incubation has generally been assumed has been considered to reflect the primitive dinosaurian condition. throughout Dinosauria (43–45). Here, nonavian dinosaurian incubation periods in both small and Incubation period estimates using regressions of typical avian large ornithischian taxa are empirically determined through growth- values relative to egg mass range from 45 to 80 d across the line counts in embryonic teeth.
    [Show full text]
  • Sind Vögel Dinosaurier? Eine Kritische Analyse Fossiler Befunde
    W+W Special Paper B-19-4 SIND VÖGEL DINOSAURIER? EINE KRITISCHE ANALYSE FOSSILER BEFUNDE Reinhard Junker August 2019 https://www.wort-und-wissen.de/artikel/sp/b-19-4_dinos-voegel.pdf Bild: Ein rekonstruiertes und künstlerisch dargestelltes Paar von Microraptor gui (Dromaeosauridae , Micro raptorinae). (durbed.deviantart.com, CC BY-SA 3.0) Sind Vögel Dinosaurier? Inhalt 1. Einleitung ...................................................................................... 3. kompakt ..................................................................................................... 4 Methodische Vorbemerkungen ............................................................................... 5 Zitate zu schrittweisem Erwerb von Vogelmerkmalen ...................................................... 6 2. Vogelmerkmale bei Theropoden: Vorläufer oder Konvergenzen ............................................................................... 9 2.1 Federtypen und Flugfähigkeit ..................................................................... 9 2.2 Zähne und Schnabel ................................................................................ 14 Zitate zu Konvergenzen bei Zahnverlust und Ausbildung eines Schnabels ................15 2.3 Gehirn und EQ ........................................................................................ 17 2.4 Furkula ..................................................................................................... 18 2.5 Gastralia, Rippenkorb, Brustbein ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • On the Preservation of the Beak in Confuciusornis (Aves: Pygostylia)
    diversity Article On the Preservation of the Beak in Confuciusornis (Aves: Pygostylia) Amanda Falk 1, Jingmai O’Connor 2,3,* , Min Wang 2,3 and Zhonghe Zhou 2,3,* 1 Biology Department, Centre College, 600 W. Walnut St. Danville, KY 40422, USA; amanda.falk@centre.edu 2 Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Beijing 100044, China; wangmin@ivpp.ac.cn 3 CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Beijing 10010, China * Correspondence: jingmai@ivpp.ac.cn (J.O.); zhouzhonghe@ivpp.ac.cn (Z.Z.) Received: 27 October 2019; Accepted: 10 November 2019; Published: 11 November 2019 Abstract: The Confuciusornithiformes represent the most stem-ward avian occurrence of an edentulous rostrum. Although a keratinous beak is widely considered to have covered the rostrum in confuciusornithiforms, this feature is almost never preserved, having been previously reported only in the holotype of Confuciusornis dui and the holotype of Eoconfuciusornis zhengi. This strongly contrasts with the widespread preservation of the keratinous sheaths that cover the manual and pedal ungual phalanges. Here, we report on a third occurrence of a preserved rhamphotheca in a specimen of Confuciusornis sanctus. We illuminated the preserved traces using laser-stimulated fluorescence. Similarly to E. zhengi, the rhamphotheca has been preserved only as a two-dimensional trace, whereas ungual sheaths are preserved in three dimensions. In contrast to the traces preserved in C. dui, the rhamphotheca in the discussed specimen of C. sanctus is straight rather than upturned. This hints towards hidden morphological diversity within the thousands of Confuciusornis specimens, in which species may be further differentiated by soft tissue features or behaviors, much like many living birds, that cannot be detected in fossils, even with exceptional preservation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oldest Record of Ornithuromorpha from the Early Cretaceous of China
    ARTICLE Received 6 Jan 2015 | Accepted 20 Mar 2015 | Published 5 May 2015 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7987 OPEN The oldest record of ornithuromorpha from the early cretaceous of China Min Wang1, Xiaoting Zheng2,3, Jingmai K. O’Connor1, Graeme T. Lloyd4, Xiaoli Wang2,3, Yan Wang2,3, Xiaomei Zhang2,3 & Zhonghe Zhou1 Ornithuromorpha is the most inclusive clade containing extant birds but not the Mesozoic Enantiornithes. The early evolutionary history of this avian clade has been advanced with recent discoveries from Cretaceous deposits, indicating that Ornithuromorpha and Enantiornithes are the two major avian groups in Mesozoic. Here we report on a new ornithuromorph bird, Archaeornithura meemannae gen. et sp. nov., from the second oldest avian-bearing deposits (130.7 Ma) in the world. The new taxon is referable to the Hongshanornithidae and constitutes the oldest record of the Ornithuromorpha. However, A. meemannae shows few primitive features relative to younger hongshanornithids and is deeply nested within the Hongshanornithidae, suggesting that this clade is already well established. The new discovery extends the record of Ornithuromorpha by five to six million years, which in turn pushes back the divergence times of early avian lingeages into the Early Cretaceous. 1 Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, China. 2 Institue of Geology and Paleontology, Linyi University, Linyi, Shandong 276000, China. 3 Tianyu Natural History Museum of Shandong, Pingyi, Shandong 273300, China. 4 Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales 2019, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Morphology of Chiappeavis Magnapremaxillo (Pengornithidae: Enantiornithes) and a Comparison of Aerodynamic Function in Early Cretaceous Avian Tail Fans Jingmai K
    第55卷 第1期 古 脊 椎 动 物 学 报 pp. 41-58 2017年1月 VERTEBRATA PALASIATICA figs. 1-8 The morphology of Chiappeavis magnapremaxillo (Pengornithidae: Enantiornithes) and a comparison of aerodynamic function in Early Cretaceous avian tail fans Jingmai K. O’CONNOR1 ZHENG Xiao-Ting2,3 HU Han1 WANG Xiao-Li2 ZHOU Zhong-He1 (1 Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100044 jingmai@ivpp.ac.cn) (2 Institute of Geology and Paleontology, Linyi University Linyi, Shandong 276000) (3 Shandong Tianyu Museum of Nature Pingyi, Shandong 273300) Abstract We provide a complete description of the skeletal anatomy of the holotype of Chiappeavis magnapremaxillo, the first enantiornithine to preserve a rectricial fan, suggesting that possibly rectricial bulbs were present in basal members of this clade. Notably, Chiappeavis preserves a primitive palatal morphology in which the vomers reach the premaxillae similar to Archaeopteryx but unlike the condition in the Late Cretaceous enantiornithine Gobipteryx. If rectricial bulbs were present, pengornithid pygostyle morphology suggests they were minimally developed. We estimate the lift generated by the tail fan preserved in this specimen and compare it to the tail fans preserved in other Early Cretaceous birds. Aerodynamic models indicate the tail of Chiappeavis produced less lift than that of sympatric ornithuromorphs. This information provides a possible explanation for the absence of widespread aerodynamic tail morphologies in the Enantiornithes. Key words Mesozoic, Jehol Biota, Aves, rectrix Citation O’Connor J K, Zheng X T, Hu H et al., 2016. The morphology of Chiappeavis magnapremaxillo (Pengornithidae: Enantiornithes) and a comparison of aerodynamic function in Early Cretaceous avian tail fans.
    [Show full text]
  • Avialan Status for Oviraptorosauria
    Avialan status for Oviraptorosauria TERESA MARYAŃSKA, HALSZKA OSMÓLSKA, and MIECZYSŁAW WOLSAN Maryańska, T., Osmólska, H., and Wolsan, M. 2002. Avialan status for Oviraptorosauria. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 47 (1): 97–116. Oviraptorosauria is a clade of Cretaceous theropod dinosaurs of uncertain affinities within Maniraptoriformes. All pre− vious phylogenetic analyses placed oviraptorosaurs outside a close relationship to birds (Avialae), recognizing Dromaeo− sauridae or Troodontidae, or a clade containing these two taxa (Deinonychosauria), as sister taxon to birds. Here we pres− ent the results of a phylogenetic analysis using 195 characters scored for four outgroup and 13 maniraptoriform (ingroup) terminal taxa, including new data on oviraptorids. This analysis places Oviraptorosauria within Avialae, in a sister−group relationship with Confuciusornis. Archaeopteryx, Therizinosauria, Dromaeosauridae, and Ornithomimosauria are suc− cessively more distant outgroups to the Confuciusornis−oviraptorosaur clade. Avimimus and Caudipteryx are succes− sively more closely related to Oviraptoroidea, which contains the sister taxa Caenagnathidae and Oviraptoridae. Within Oviraptoridae, “Oviraptor” mongoliensis and Oviraptor philoceratops are successively more closely related to the Conchoraptor−Ingenia clade. Oviraptorosaurs are hypothesized to be secondarily flightless. Emended phylogenetic defi− nitions are provided for Oviraptoridae, Caenagnathidae, Oviraptoroidea, Oviraptorosauria, Avialae, Eumaniraptora, Maniraptora, and Maniraptoriformes.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproduction in Mesozoic Birds and Evolution of the Modern Avian Reproductive Mode Author(S): David J
    Reproduction in Mesozoic birds and evolution of the modern avian reproductive mode Author(s): David J. Varricchio and Frankie D. Jackson Source: The Auk, 133(4):654-684. Published By: American Ornithological Society DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1642/AUK-15-216.1 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1642/AUK-15-216.1 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Volume 133, 2016, pp. 654–684 DOI: 10.1642/AUK-15-216.1 REVIEW Reproduction in Mesozoic birds and evolution of the modern avian reproductive mode David J. Varricchio and Frankie D. Jackson Earth Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA djv@montana.edu, frankiej@montana.edu Submitted November 16, 2015; Accepted June 2, 2016; Published August 10, 2016 ABSTRACT The reproductive biology of living birds differs dramatically from that of other extant vertebrates.
    [Show full text]
  • Reanalysis of Putative Ovarian Follicles Suggests That Early Cretaceous Birds Were Feeding Not Breeding Gerald Mayr1*, Thomas G
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Reanalysis of putative ovarian follicles suggests that Early Cretaceous birds were feeding not breeding Gerald Mayr1*, Thomas G. Kaye2, Michael Pittman3, Evan T. Saitta4 & Christian Pott5 We address the identity of putative ovarian follicles in Early Cretaceous bird fossils from the Jehol Biota (China), whose identifcation has previously been challenged. For the frst time, we present a link to the botanical fossil record, showing that the “follicles” of some enantiornithine fossils resemble plant propagules from the Jehol Biota, which belong to Carpolithes multiseminalis. The botanical afnities of this “form-taxon” are currently unresolved, but we note that C. multiseminalis propagules resemble propagules associated with cone-like organs described as Strobilites taxusoides, which in turn are possibly associated with sterile foliage allocated to Liaoningcladus. Laser-Stimulated Fluorescence imaging furthermore reveals diferent intensities of fuorescence of “follicles” associated with a skeleton of the confuciusornithid Eoconfuciusornis zhengi, with a non-fuorescent circular micro-pattern indicating carbonaceous (or originally carbonaceous) matter. This is inconsistent with the interpretation of these structures as ovarian follicles. We therefore reafrm that the “follicles” represent ingested food items, and even though the exact nature of the Eoconfuciusornis stomach contents remains elusive, at least some enantiornithines ingested plant propagules. Over the past decades, the Jehol Biota in northeast China yielded an extraordinary diversity of fossils, which produced unprecedented insights into Early Cretaceous ecosystems. Even though the specimens from these localities are known for their exquisite sof-tissue preservation, the discovery of putative ovarian follicles in some of the bird fossils stands out and is otherwise unmatched in the avian fossil record.
    [Show full text]
  • Unenlagiid Theropods: Are They Members of the Dromaeosauridae (Theropoda, Maniraptora)?
    “main” — 2011/2/10 — 14:01 — page 117 — #1 Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (2011) 83(1): 117-162 (Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences) Printed version ISSN 0001-3765 / Online version ISSN 1678-2690 www.scielo.br/aabc Unenlagiid theropods: are they members of the Dromaeosauridae (Theropoda, Maniraptora)? , FEDERICO L. AGNOLIN1 2 and FERNANDO E. NOVAS1 1Laboratorio de Anatomía Comparada y Evolución de los Vertebrados Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia” Ángel Gallardo, 470 (1405BDB), Buenos Aires, Argentina 2Fundación de Historia Natural “Félix de Azara”, Departamento de Ciencias Naturales y Antropología CEBBAD, Universidad Maimónides, Valentín Virasoro 732 (1405BDB), Buenos Aires, Argentina Manuscript received on November 9, 2009; accepted for publication on June 21, 2010 ABSTRACT In the present paper we analyze the phylogenetic position of the derived Gondwanan theropod clade Unen- lagiidae. Although this group has been frequently considered as deeply nested within Deinonychosauria and Dromaeosauridae, most of the features supporting this interpretation are conflictive, at least. Modification of integrative databases, such as that recently published by Hu et al. (2009), produces significant changes in the topological distribution of taxa within Deinonychosauria, depicting unenlagiids outside this clade. Our analysis retrieves, in contrast, a monophyletic Avialae formed by Unenlagiidae plus Aves. Key words: Gondwana, Deinonychosauria, Dromaeosauridae, Unenlagiidae, Avialae. INTRODUCTION Until recently, the deinonychosaurian fossil record has been geographically restricted to the Northern Hemisphere (Norell and Makovicky 2004), but recent discoveries demonstrated that they were also present and highly diversified in the Southern landmasses, suggesting that an important adaptive radiation took place in Gondwana during the Cretaceous. Gondwanan dromaeosaurids have been documented from Turonian through Maastrichtian beds of Argentina (Makovicky et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Remarkable Fossils from the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota of China and How They Have Changed Our Knowledge of Mesozoic Life
    The remarkable fossils from the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota of China and how they have changed our knowledge of Mesozoic life Presidential Address, delivered 2nd May 2008 Michael J. Benton1, Zhou Zhonghe2, Patrick J. Orr3, Zhang Fucheng2 & Stuart L. Kearns1 BENTON, M. J., ZHOU Z., ORR, P. J., ZHANG, F. & KEARNS, S. L. 2008. The remarkable fossils from the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota of China and how they have changed our knowledge. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, 119, 209–228. Palaeontologists and others have been repeatedly amazed by reports of spectacularly well-preserved fossils from China, and one of the key sources has been the Jehol Biota of Liaoning, Hebei and Inner Mongolia in NE China. The Jehol Biota consists of three main horizons, the Dabeigou, Yixian and Jiufotang formations, spanning the late Hauterivian to early Aptian (131–120 Ma) of the Early Cretaceous and, collectively, these have produced thousands of essentially complete specimens of plants, insects, aquatic invertebrates, fishes, frogs, salamanders, turtles, lizards, choristoderes, pterosaurs, dinosaurs, birds and mammals. Most of the specimens show some aspect of exceptional preservation, ranging from clear impressions of the body outlines to traces of soft tissues (liver, teleost air sac, eye spots) and external body coverings (scales, feathers, hair). The claim was made that these discoveries have revolutionized our understanding of evolution through this critical part of the Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution. Key insights have come from the numerous specimens of dinosaurs with feathers, but numerical study shows that only the finds of birds and mammals have substantially changed our views about global diversity and patterns of evolution through the Early Cretaceous.
    [Show full text]
  • T Riassic Jurassic Cretaceous
    Millions of Years Ago 252.17 247.2 237.0 201.3 174.1 163.5 145.0 100.5 66.0 Avemetatarsalia Triassic Jurassic Cretaceous Early Middle Late Early Middle Late Early Late Scleromochlus Pterosauria Ornithodira Lagerpetidae Marasuchus Dinosauromorpha Genasauria Silesauridae Neornithsichia Nyasasaurus Dinosauriformes Thyreophora Ornithischia Eocursor ? Heterodontosauridae Pisanosaurus Dinosauria Sauropodomorpha Herrerasauria Saurischia Eodromaeus Theropoda Daemonosaurus Tawa Neotheropoda Millions of Years Ago 252.17 247.2 237.0 201.3 174.1 163.5 145.0 100.5 66.0 Triassic Jurassic Cretaceous Early Middle Late Early Middle Late Early Late Cerapoda Ornithopoda Marginocephalia Eocursor Parksosauridae Laquintasaura Kulindadromeus Othnielosaurus Jeholosauridae Neornithischia Leaellynasaura Hexinlusaurus Agilisaurus Stegosauridae Lesothosaurus Stegosaurinae Stegosauria Dacentrurinae Kentrosaurus Tuojiangosaurus Thyreophoroidea Struthiosaurinae Genasauria Huayangosauridae Eurypoda Gigantspinosaurus Panoplosaurinae Nodosauridae Sauropelta Polacanthinae Scelidosaurus Gargoyleosaurus Ankylosauridae Thyreophora Scutellosaurus Kunbarrasaurus Ankylosauria Hylaeosurus Shamosaurinae Ankylosaurinae Pinacosaurus Tianchiasaurus Ankylosaurini Millions of Years Ago 252.17 247.2 237.0 201.3 174.1 163.5 145.0 100.5 66.0 Triassic Jurassic Cretaceous Euhadrosauria Early Middle Late Early Middle Late Early Late Hadrosaurinae Hadrosauridae Hadrosauromorpha Lambeosaurinae Eotrachodon Tethyshadros Hadrosauriformes Hadrosauria Telmatosaurus Bactrosaurus Protohadros Styracosterna
    [Show full text]