DOCSLIB.ORG

Output 3.2 3 Report on State of the Art and Gap Analysis EN

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

State of the Art Report and Gap Analysis in the field of environmentally-friendly transport infrastructure development State of the Art Report and Gap Analysis in the field of environmentally-friendly transport infrastructure development Part of Output 3.2 Planning Toolkit TRANSGREEN Project “Integrated Transport and Green Infrastructure Planning in the Danube-Carpathian Region for the Benefit of People and Nature” Danube Transnational Programme, DTP1-187-3.1 April 2019 Project co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) www.interreg-danube.eu/transgreen Authors Cristian-Remus Papp (WWF Danube-Carpathian Programme, Romania) Marius Gavril Berchi (WWF Danube-Carpathian Programme, Romania) Contributors Csaba Domokos (Association Milvus Group, Romania) Ivo Dostál (Transport Research Centre, the Czech Republic) Maroš Finka (Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava – SPECTRA Centre for Excellence of EU) Katarína Gáliková (National Motorway Company, Slovakia) Adrian Grancea (WWF Danube-Carpathian Programme, Romania) Barbara Immerová (WWF Danube-Carpathian Programme consultant, Slovakia) Ján Kadlečík (State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic) Ivan Koubek (State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic) Radu Moț (Association Zarand, initiator of GreenWEB – Connecting people and landscapes, Romania) Gabriella Nagy (CEEweb for Biodiversity, Hungary) Erzsebét Ohegyi (CEEweb for Biodiversity, Hungary) Vladimír Ondrejička (Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava – SPECTRA Centre for Excellence of EU) Anatoliy Pavelko (Consultant, lawyer, EIA and environmental specialist, Ukraine) Goran Sekulić (WWF Adria, Serbia) Valeria Shcherba (WWF Danube-Carpathian Programme, Consultant) Michaela Skuban (State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic) State of the Art Report and Gap Analysis 3 Andrzej Sieminski (Ministry of Infrastructure and Construction, Poland) András Szirányi (National Infrastructure Developing Private Company Ltd., Hungary) Martin Strnad (Nature Conservation Agency, the Czech Republic) Tereza Thompson (State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic) András Weiperth (Szent Istvan University, Hungary) Taras Yamelynets (WWF Danube-Carpathian Programme consultant, Ukraine) Supervision Elke Hahn (Austrian Ministry of Transport, Innovation and Technology, IENE – Infra Eco Network Europe Gover- nance Board Member, Member of the Conference of European Directors of Roads) Lazaros Georgiadis (Biologist, Environmental Consultant, IENE – Infra Eco Network Europe Governance Board Member, Greece) Layout and graphic design: Alex Spineanu (Graphic designer, Romania) Marián Špacír (SPECTRA) with the support of Catalina Murariu (WWF Romania) English proofreading: Private Language School BS SCHOOL, Ondrej Straka, BSBA Acknowledgement This publication was elaborated as part of Output 3.2 Planning Toolkit of the TRANSGREEN “Integrated Transport and Green Infrastructure Planning in the Danube Carpathian Region for the Benefit of People and Nature” project (DTP1-187-3.1, January 2017 – June 2019) funded by the Danube Transnational Programme through European Regional Development Funds. Authors gratefully acknowledge the efforts of all TRANSGREEN project partners and stakeholders within the frame of the Carpathian Convention and trust that they will benefit from the result. Citation Papp, C. R., Berchi, M. G. et al., (2019): State of the Art Report and Gap Analysis in the field of environ- mentally-friendly transport infrastructure development, Danube Transnational Programme TRANS- GREEN Project, WWF Romania, Bucharest, Romania. This publication may be reproduced as a whole or in parts and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without any special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowl- edgement or the resource is made. This publication may in no case be used for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the main author. 4 Project co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) www.interreg-danube.eu/transgreen Disclaimer The content of this publication is the sole responsibility of the authors and does not express views of any single participating organisation, or the views of one individual, nor the positions of the European Union. About TRANSGREEN TRANSGREEN means a better connected Carpathian region with transport infrastructure that takes nature into account. The project aims to contribute to safer and environmentally-friendly road and rail networks that are being developed in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania, Slovakia, and Ukraine. www.interreg-danube.eu/transgreen Output 3.2 Planning Toolkit consists of the following parts: ◾ Wildlife and Traffic in the Carpathians - Guidelines how to minimize the impact of transport infra- structure development on nature in the Carpathian countries ◾ TRANSGREEN Policy Recommendations on integrated road and rail transportation planning in the Carpathians ◾ State of the Art Report and Gap Analysis in the field of environmentally-friendly transport infra- structure development ◾ Keeping Nature Connected – Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for Integrated Green Infra- structure Planning ◾ Public Participation – Scheme for an integrated linear transport infrastructure development/ planning ◾ Tools for registering animal-vehicle collisions State of the Art Report and Gap Analysis 5 Table of contents Foreword 10 1. Introduction 12 1.1 General Context 13 1.2 To whom is the report addressed? 13 2. Legislative Context 14 2.1 European Directives and strategies, relevant conventions 15 2.1.1 EU Nature Directives (FFH, BD) and the Biodiversity Strategy 15 2.1.2 Transportation Directives (road and rail) 16 2.2 Carpathian Convention 21 2.3 ESPOO Convention 22 2.4 National legislation in the field of nature protection and transport infrastructure development 23 2.4.1 The Czech Republic 23 2.4.2 Hungary 25 2.4.3 Poland 26 2.4.4 Romania 27 2.4.5 Serbia 29 2.4.6 Slovakia 29 2.4.7 Ukraine 31 2.5 Environmental procedures 33 2.5.1 SEA procedure 33 2.5.2 EIA procedure 34 2.5.3 AA procedure 34 3. Key Ecological Aspects 36 3.1 Ecological connectivity, networks and corridors 37 3.2 Role and importance of ecological corridors for animal movement and/or dispersal 39 3.3 Main threats to ecological connectivity 51 3.4 Effects of road infrastructure on biodiversity 52 4. Status of Ecological Corridors in the Project Area 56 6 4.1 Ecological corridors in the Czech Republic – status of identification (including the existence of a methodology), protection and management 57 4.2 Ecological corridors in Hungary – status of identification (including the existence of a methodology), protection and management 58 4.3 Ecological corridors in Poland – status of identification (including the existence of a methodology), protection and management 58 4.4 Ecological corridors in Romania – status of identification (including the existence of a methodology), protection and management 59 4.5 Ecological corridors in Serbia – status of identification (including the existence of a methodology), protection and management 59 4.6 Ecological corridors in Slovakia – status of identification (including the existence of a methodology), protection and management 60 4.7 Ecological corridors in Ukraine – status of identification (including the existence of a methodology), protection and management 61 4.8 Final conclusion 61 5. Status of the Road and Railway Network Development in the Project Area 64 5.1 Introduction 65 5.2 Status of the road network and railway development 66 5.3 Country specific information 71 5.3.1 Romania 71 5.3.2 Slovakia 72 5.3.3 The Czech Republic 73 5.3.4 Hungary 74 5.3.5 Ukraine 75 5.3.6 Poland 76 5.3.7 Serbia 77 6. Effects of Current Road and Rail Transportation on Ecological Corridors in the Project Area 78 6.1 Effects of current road and rail transportation on ecological corridors in the Czech Republic – overlaps between transport infrastructures and ecological corridors, barrier effect and habitat fragmentation, disturbance 79 7 6.2 Effects of the current roads and rail transportation on ecological corridors in Hungary – overlaps between transport infrastructures and ecological corridors, barrier effect and habitat fragmentation, disturbance 81 6.3 Effects of current road and rail transportation on ecological corridors in Poland – overlaps between transport infrastructures and ecological corridors, barrier effect and habitat fragmentation, disturbance 82 6.4 Effects of current road and rail transportation on ecological corridors in Romania – overlaps between transport infrastructures and ecological corridors, barrier effect and habitat fragmentation, disturbance 83 6.5 Effects of current road and rail transportation on ecological corridors in Serbia – overlaps between transport infrastructures and ecological corridors, barrier effect and habitat fragmentation, disturbance 84 6.6 Effects of current road and rail transportation on ecological corridors in Slovakia – overlaps between transport infrastructures and ecological corridors, barrier effect and habitat fragmentation, disturbance 85 6.7 Effects of current road and rail transportation on ecological corridors in Ukraine – overlaps between transport infrastructures and ecological corridors, barrier effect and habitat fragmentation, disturbance 86 7. Planning of Highways and Railways in the Project Areas 88 7.1 Minimizing fragmentation through appropriate planning 89 7.2 Planning of highways and railways in individual countries – practices including environmental
Recommended publications
  • Information Current As of November 18, 2020

    Information Current As of November 18, 2020

    Information Current as of November 18, 2020 Table of Contents SOURCEREE PERSPECTIVE ............................................................................................3 OVERVIEW .........................................................................................................................6 WEBSITES ...........................................................................................................................6 OWNERSHIP .......................................................................................................................6 OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................................6 FINANCIAL INTENTIONS .................................................................................................7 THE EFFECT ON AMERICA .............................................................................................8 ECONOMIC CORRIDORS .................................................................................................9 FUNDING .......................................................................................................................... 11 APPENDIX A: PROGRAM LEADERSHIP ....................................................................... 16 APPENDIX B: ASSOCIATED ENTITIES ......................................................................... 18 APPENDIX C: PARTICIPATING NATIONS.................................................................... 21 APPENDIX D: PROJECTS ...............................................................................................
  • WBIF Monitoring Report Published

    WBIF Monitoring Report Published

    MONITORING REPORT May 2021 MONITORING REPORT Abbreviations and acronyms AFD Agence Française de Développement KfW kfW Development Bank bn Billion MD Main Design CBA Cost-Benefit Analysis m Million CD Concept Design PD Preliminary Design CEB Council of Europe Development Bank PFG Project Financiers’ Group CF Co-financing / Investment Grant PFS Pre-feasibility Study DD Detailed Design PIU Support to Project Implementation Unit EWBJF European Western Balkans Joint Fund PSD Public Sector Development EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and RBMP River Basin Management Plan Development REEP/REEP Plus Regional Energy Efficiency Programme for EBRD SSF EBRD Shareholder Special Fund the Western Balkans EFA Economic and Financial Appraisal SC Steering Committee EIA Environmental Impact Assessment SD Sector Development EIB European Investment Bank SDP Sector Development Project EFSE European Fund for Southeast Europe SIA Social Impact Assessment ESIA Environmental and Social Impact SOC Social Sector Assessment SOW Supervision of Works ENE Energy Sector TA Technical Assistance ENV Environment Sector TMA Technical and Management Assistance EU European Union ToR Terms of Reference EWBJF European Western Balkans Joint Fund TRA Transport Sector FAA Financial Affordability Analysis WB EDIF Western Balkans Enterprise and Innovation FS Feasibility Study Facility GGF Green for Growth Fund WBG World Bank Group ID Identification WBIF Western Balkans Investment Framework IFI International Financial Institution WWTP Wastewater Treatment Plant IPA Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance IPF Infrastructure Project Facility IRS Interest Rate Subsidies This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the Western Balkans Investment Framework and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.
  • Population in the Slovak Carpathian Mountains

    Population in the Slovak Carpathian Mountains

    Monitoring protocol for the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) population in the Slovak Carpathian Mountains A1. Assessment and selection of sites and lynx for live-capture from the Carpathian source population in Slovakia D1. Monitoring the effects of lynx removal for translocations on the source populations Authors: Kubala J. Smolko P. Klinga P. Tám B. & Kropil R. September 2018 Report for the implementation of action A1 and D1 Realized in the frame of action A1: Assessment and selection of sites and lynx for live-capture from the Carpathian source population in Slovakia Authors: Kubala J. Smolko P. Klinga P. Tám B. & Kropil R. Content 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………….5 2. Objectives and attributes……………………………………………………………….7 3. Survey areas…………………………………………………………………………....7 4. Aims and principles of monitoring……………………………………………………11 5. What will be monitored?................................................................................................11 6. Monitoring network…………………………………………………………………...14 7. Passive monitoring: Collecting a chance (opportunistic information)………………..14 8. Active monitoring: Systematic surveys and monitoring system………………………15 8.1. Snow tracking………………………………………………………………………...15 8.2. Opportunistic and standardized collection of samples for genetic analysis…………..16 8.3. Camera trapping………………………………………………………………….......16 8.3.1. Opportunistic camera trapping……………………………………………………17 8.3.2. Deterministic camera trapping………………………………………………….....18 8.4. Captures and GPS/GSM telemetry…………………………………………………...20 9. Survey, monitoring and capture time-frame…………………………………………..22 References…………………………………………………………………………………….23 Foreword The purpose of this protocol is to provide detailed information about the objectives, attributes, sampling design and data management necessary for the implementation of the actions A1 and D1 within the LIFE LYNX - LIFE16 NAT/SI/000634 Together with the protocol on the A2 action in the Romanian Carpathians - Gazzola et al. (2018) it is required by the need to ensure a technical framework for the LIFE Lynx project team.
  • 1-Kongres 2014 ABSTRAKT CB.Pdf

    1-Kongres 2014 ABSTRAKT CB.Pdf

    ЗБОРНИК АБСТРАКАТА Први српски конгрес о путевима , 5-6 јун 2014. BOOK OF ABSTRACTS First Serbian Road Congress , June 5-6 2014. Издавач Српско друштво за путеве " VIA-VITA" Кумодрашка 257, 11000 Београд За издавача Душан Богојевић Уредници проф. др Милан Вујанић Биљана Вуксановић, дипл. инж. грађ. Графички дизајн: Омнибус, Београд Штампа: Дедрапласт, Београд Тираж: 300 ISBN: 978-86-88541-01-5 ЗБОРНИК АБСТРАКАТА Први српски конгрес о путевима , 5-6 јун 2014. BOOK OF ABSTRACTS First Serbian Road Congress , June 5-6 2014. Српско друштво за путеве " VIA-VITA" Београд , 2014. САДРЖАЈ Уводна реч Милан Вујанић... 15 Поздравна реч Биљана Вуксановић... 17 ТЕМА 1... Студије и пројектовање / Studies and Design SOIL TREATMENT WITH LIME FOR FINE CLAYEY SOILS: AN ECONOMICAL SOLUTION FOR SUBGRADE, SUB BASE, BASE & CAPPING LAYERS Christophe Denayer, Gabriele Tebaldi... 21 MAGISTRALNI PUT M18 (E 762) FOČA (BIH) - ŠĆEPAN POLJE (CG) KAO DIO GLAVNE PUTNE MREŽE REGIONA - PROJEKTOVANJE I MODERNIZACIJA Predrag Šarkinović, Elvir Alić, Mario Jerčinović... 21 ODABIR OPTIMALNOG SISTEMA NAPLATE PUTARINE ZA MREŽU AUTOPUTEVA REPUBLIKE SRPSKE "CASE STUDY" Draženko Glavić... 22 PREGLED DIMENZIONIRANJA SAVITLJIVIH KOLNIČKIH KONSTRUKCIJA U EUROPSKOJ I NAŠOJ REGULATIVI Boris Čutura, Ivan Lovrić, Branko Mazić... 23 EKSPERIMENTALNO ISPITIVANJE STABILNOSTI POTPORNIH ZIDOVA OD PREFABRIKOVANIH BETONBLOK ELEMENATA Nebojša Davidović, Zoran Bonić, Verka Prolović, Nikola Romić, Nikola Davidović... 24 PROJEKAT AUTOPUTA E-80 NIŠ – DIMITROVGRAD Milosav Rajković... 24 HIJERARHIJSKA KONTROLA PRISTUPA NA DRŽAVNE PUTEVE - OBAVEZA PLANERA/PROJEKTANTA Dušan Savković... 26 EVALUATION OF TRAVEL TIME DATA COLLECTION AND TRAFFIC MONITORING TECHNOLOGIES FOR A WIDE-AREA NETWORK Reza Omrani, Pedram Izadpanah, Goran Nikolic, Alireza Hadayeghi... 26 ИЗВОЂЕЊЕ ТУНЕЛА ''БАНЦАРЕВО'' Слободан Савић..
  • Public-Private Partnerships Financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020

    Public-Private Partnerships Financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020

    EUROPEAN PPP EXPERTISE CENTRE Public-private partnerships financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020 March 2021 Public-private partnerships financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020 March 2021 Terms of Use of this Publication The European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC) is part of the Advisory Services of the European Investment Bank (EIB). It is an initiative that also involves the European Commission, Member States of the EU, Candidate States and certain other States. For more information about EPEC and its membership, please visit www.eib.org/epec. The findings, analyses, interpretations and conclusions contained in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the EIB or any other EPEC member. No EPEC member, including the EIB, accepts any responsibility for the accuracy of the information contained in this publication or any liability for any consequences arising from its use. Reliance on the information provided in this publication is therefore at the sole risk of the user. EPEC authorises the users of this publication to access, download, display, reproduce and print its content subject to the following conditions: (i) when using the content of this document, users should attribute the source of the material and (ii) under no circumstances should there be commercial exploitation of this document or its content. Purpose and Methodology This report is part of EPEC’s work on monitoring developments in the public-private partnership (PPP) market. It is intended to provide an overview of the role played by the EIB in financing PPP projects inside and outside of Europe since 1990.
  • Individual Financial Statements 2017 Content 2

    Individual Financial Statements 2017 Content 2

    Individual Financial Statements 2017 Content 2 Content INDIVIDUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS AT 31 DECMEBER 2017 .................................................. 3 Balance sheet as at 31 December 2017 ......................................................................................... 3 Income statment for the 2017 financial year ................................................................................... 5 NOTES TO THE 2017 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF STRABAG SE, VILLACH ..................................... 6 Application of Austrian Business Enterprise Code ......................................................................... 6 Accounting policies ......................................................................................................................... 6 Notes to the balance sheet ............................................................................................................. 8 Notes to the income statement .................................................................................................... 10 Additional disclosures ................................................................................................................... 11 Statement of changes in non-current assets as of 31 December 2017 (Appendix 1 to the Notes of the financial statements) .................................................................. 13 List of participations (Appendix 2 to the Notes of the financial statements) ................................ 15 Management and Supervisory Board (Appendix 3 to the
  • 3Rd Workplan

    3Rd Workplan

    Baltic Adriatic Third Work Plan of the European Coordinator Kurt Bodewig APRIL 2018 Mobility and Transport APRIL 2018 This report represents the opinion of the European Coordinator and does not prejudice the official position of the European Commission. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for any potential use which may be made of the information contained herein. Publication date: April 2018 Reference source of analysis: 2015-2017 Baltic-Adriatic Corridor Study, Final Report, January 2018 Contents 1. Towards the third Baltic-Adriatic corridor work plan .................................... 5 2. Characteristics of the Baltic-Adriatic Corridor ............................................... 8 2.1. From the Polish to the Adriatic ports – corridor alignment ........................... 8 2.2. Compliance with the technical infrastructure parameters of the TEN-T guidelines in 2017 ........................................................................ 9 2.3. Progress of corridor development ............................................................17 3. Transport market analysis .......................................................................... 19 3.1. Results of the multimodal transport market study .....................................19 3.2. Capacity issues on the rail and road networks ..........................................23 4. Planned projects along the Baltic-Adriatic Corridor
  • Environmental and Social Data Sheet

    Environmental and Social Data Sheet

    Luxembourg, 21st October 2015 Environmental and Social Data Sheet Overview Project Name: D4R7 SLOVAKIA PPP Project Number: 2015-0059 Country: Slovakia Project Description: The project consists of the design, construction and financing of approximately 27 km of the D4 motorway around Bratislava, which will connect to the R7 expressway and is to be procured as part of the D4R7 PPP. EIA required: yes 1 Project included in Carbon Footprint Exercise : yes (details for projects included are provided in section: “EIB Carbon Footprint Exercise”) Summary of Environmental and Social Assessment, including key issues and overall conclusion and recommendation The D4 motorway is to be procured, together with the R7 expressway, as part of the D4/R7 public private partnership (PPP). The D4/R7 project was divided into five sections for preparation and assessment: D4 Jarovce – Ivanka Sever, D4 Ivanka Sever – Rača, R7 Prievoz – Ketelec, R7 Ketelec – Dunajská Lužná and R7 Dunajská Lužná – Holice. The project was included in the Programme of Highways and Expressways, amendment number 3 (2012), and also in the Strategic Plan for Development of Transport Infrastructure in Slovak Republic by 2020 (2014). Both programmes were subject to a strategic environmental assessment (SEA) in accordance with Directive 2001/42/EC. The D4 motorway is a class of development that falls under Annex I of the environmental impact assessment (EIA) Directive 2011/92/EU. The EIAs for all D4 and R7 sections were initially completed between 2008 and 2010 and received favourable opinion for development subject to conditions from the Slovak Ministry of Environment (MoE). Subsequently the project design was amended and further assessments were undertaken between 2013 and 2014 – including appropriate assessment in accordance with Article 6 of the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC.
  • Documents.Worldbank.Org

    Documents.Worldbank.Org

    46730 THE WORLD BANK GROUP WASHINGTON, D.C. TP-23 TRANSPORT PAPERS NOVEMBER 2008 Public Disclosure Authorized Road User Charges: Current Practice and Perspectives in Central and Eastern Europe Cesar Queiroz, Barbara Rdzanowska, Robert Garbarczyk and Michel Audige Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized TRANSPORT SECTOR BOARD ROAD USER CHARGES: CURRENT PRACTICE AND PERSPECTIVES IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE Cesar Queiroz, Barbara Rdzanowska, Robert Garbarczyk and Michel Audige THE WORLD BANK WASHINGTON, D.C. © 2008 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington, DC 20433 Telephone 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org This volume is a product of the staff of The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA; telephone: 978-750-8400; fax: 978-750-4470; Internet: www.copyright.com.
  • DLA Piper. Details of the Member Entities of DLA Piper Are Available on the Website

    DLA Piper. Details of the Member Entities of DLA Piper Are Available on the Website

    EUROPEAN PPP REPORT 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Report has been published with particular thanks to: The EPEC Executive and in particular, Livia Dumitrescu, Goetz von Thadden, Mathieu Nemoz and Laura Potten. Those EPEC Members and EIB staff who commented on the country reports. Each of the contributors of a ‘View from a Country’. Line Markert and Mikkel Fritsch from Horten for assistance with the report on Denmark. Andrei Aganimov from Borenius & Kemppinen for assistance with the report on Finland. Maura Capoulas Santos and Alberto Galhardo Simões from Miranda Correia Amendoeira & Associados for assistance with the report on Portugal. Gustaf Reuterskiöld and Malin Cope from DLA Nordic for assistance with the report on Sweden. Infra-News for assistance generally and in particular with the project lists. All those members of DLA Piper who assisted with the preparation of the country reports and finally, Rosemary Bointon, Editor of the Report. Production of Report and Copyright This European PPP Report 2009 ( “Report”) has been produced and edited by DLA Piper*. DLA Piper acknowledges the contribution of the European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC)** in the preparation of the Report. DLA Piper retains editorial responsibility for the Report. In contributing to the Report neither the European Investment Bank, EPEC, EPEC’s Members, nor any Contributor*** indicates or implies agreement with, or endorsement of, any part of the Report. This document is the copyright of DLA Piper and the Contributors. This document is confidential and personal to you. It is provided to you on the understanding that it is not to be re-used in any way, duplicated or distributed without the written consent of DLA Piper or the relevant Contributor.
  • Guidelines for Wildlife and Traffic in the Carpathians

    Guidelines for Wildlife and Traffic in the Carpathians

    Wildlife and Traffic in the Carpathians Guidelines how to minimize the impact of transport infrastructure development on nature in the Carpathian countries Wildlife and Traffic in the Carpathians Guidelines how to minimize the impact of transport infrastructure development on nature in the Carpathian countries Part of Output 3.2 Planning Toolkit TRANSGREEN Project “Integrated Transport and Green Infrastructure Planning in the Danube-Carpathian Region for the Benefit of People and Nature” Danube Transnational Programme, DTP1-187-3.1 April 2019 Project co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) www.interreg-danube.eu/transgreen Authors Václav Hlaváč (Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic, Member of the Carpathian Convention Work- ing Group for Sustainable Transport, co-author of “COST 341 Habitat Fragmentation due to Trans- portation Infrastructure, Wildlife and Traffic, A European Handbook for Identifying Conflicts and Designing Solutions” and “On the permeability of roads for wildlife: a handbook, 2002”) Petr Anděl (Consultant, EVERNIA s.r.o. Liberec, Czech Republic, co-author of “On the permeability of roads for wildlife: a handbook, 2002”) Jitka Matoušová (Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic) Ivo Dostál (Transport Research Centre, Czech Republic) Martin Strnad (Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic, specialist in ecological connectivity) Contributors Andriy-Taras Bashta (Biologist, Institute of Ecology of the Carpathians, National Academy of Science in Ukraine) Katarína Gáliková (National
  • Bronze Age Settlement Research in North-Eastern Hungary Bronzkori Településkutatások Északkelet-Magyarországon Klára P

    Bronze Age Settlement Research in North-Eastern Hungary Bronzkori Településkutatások Északkelet-Magyarországon Klára P

    Archeometriai Műhely 2015/XII./2. 117 BRONZE AGE SETTLEMENT RESEARCH IN NORTH-EASTERN HUNGARY BRONZKORI TELEPÜLÉSKUTATÁSOK ÉSZAKKELET-MAGYARORSZÁGON KLÁRA P. FISCHL1, TOBIAS L. KIENLIN2, BEÁTA TUGYA3 1Institute for History, Department of Prehistory and Archaeology, University of Miskolc, 3515 Miskolc-Egyetemváros, Hungary 2Institut für Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Universität zu Köln, Weyertal 125, 50923 Köln, Germany 3Thúry György Múzeum, 8800 Nagykanizsa, Zrínyi M. u. 62. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract In this paper we want to provide a brief introduction to our current research on the Early to Middle Bronze Age (Hatvan to Füzesabony period) settlement sites in the Borsod plain of North-eastern Hungary. Our work is based on intensive archaeological surface survey, aerial photography, topographical measurements and magnetometer survey that provide important data both on the intra and off-site level. With the results obtained so far, it is possible to provide a much more nuanced picture of both the internal structure of the tell and tell-like Bronze Age sites of our study area and their development through time than was hitherto possible. As an example of the ongoing research we will discuss some results of our work at the site of Tiszabábolna-Fehérlótanya including the surface finds, magnetometry and archaeozoological results. Auszug Nach einem kurzen Überblick über die methodischen Grundlagen des BORBAS Projektes (Borsod Region Bronze Age Settlements) wird in diesem Beitrag der Kenntnisstand zur früh- und mittelbronzezeitlichen Besiedlung (Hatvan- und Füzesabony-Periode) der Borsod-Ebene in Nordostungarn dargestellt. Neue Forschungsergebnisse im Rahmen des BORBAS Projektes erlauben es, ein differenzierteres Bild des Aufbaus der einzelnen Siedlungen und ihrer Entwicklung im Laufe der Zeit zu entwerfen als dies bislang möglich war.