The Press and the Bay of Pigs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Press and the Bay of Pigs FALL 1967 Reprinted from THE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY FORUM THE PRESS AND THE BAY OF PIGS VICTOR BERNSTEIN and JESSE GORDON Aside from its other mean- mountain town of Retalhuleu and said that the ings, the Bay of Pigs was "also important in whole affair had been aired on the front page the history of relations between the American of La Hora, Guatemala's leading newspaper. press and the U. S. Government," Clifton Daniel, The editorial ended : managing editor of The New York Times, told We ourselves, of course, pretend to no first-hand the World Press Institute last year. Mr. Daniel knowledge of the facts. If Washington is went on to reconstruct this history insofar as it ignorant of the existence of the base, or, know- ing that it exists, is nevertheless innocent of any involved his newspaper. This article attempts a involvement in it, then surely the appropriate reconstruction on a somewhat broader basis. authorities will want to scotch all invidious Such a history has permanent relevance to the rumors. On the other hand, if the reports democratic process; and, in any case, it is al- as heard by Dr. Hilton are true, then public ways useful to remind the press that if it wor- pressure should be brought to bear upon the Ad- ministration to abandon this dangerous and ried as much about its own credibility gap as hare-brained project. about the Administration's the country would There is a second reason why we believe the be well served. reports merit publication; they can, and should, V Early in November, 1960, Carey McWilliams, be checked immediately by all U.S. news media editor of The Nation, received a phone call from with correspondents in Guatemala. Paul Baran, Stanford University economist. He The issue containing the editorial went to said that Ronald Hilton, then director of Stan- press on Friday, November 11. On that day, 75 ford's Institute of Hispanic American and Luso- proofs, together with copies of a news release Brazilian Studies, "is just back from Guatemala. based upon the editorial, were distributed by In, the current issue of his Hispanic American Jesse Gordon to all major news media, including Report, he writes that it is common knowledge foreign news bureaus in New York. The more down there that the CIA is training Cuban important local offices were serviced by mes- exiles at a secret Guatemalan base in prepara- senger. Mr. Gordon followed the dispatch of the tion for an invasion of Cuba." Mr. McWilliams releases with telephone calls to various news checked back with Dr. Hilton, and the result was desks. an editorial which appeared in The Nation of The phone calls elicited some puzzling reac- Saturday, November 19. tions. The Associated Press was called three "Fidel Castro," the editorial began, "may have times ; each time a different desk man answered, a sounder basis for his expressed fears of a U. S.- professed interest in the story, but said he hadn't financed 'Guatemala-type' invasion than most of seen either the release or a proof of the edi- us realize." It went on to give the gist of Dr. torial. Could duplicates be sent immediately? Hilton's story, which located the base near the Three duplicates were sent in as many hours, apparently to end up on the desk of someone in Mr. Bernstein graduated from Columbia College in 1926 the AP hierarchy who didn't want them to go and from the Columbia School of Journalism in 1925. He any farther. In the end, neither the AP nor the was managing editor of The Nation from 1952 to 1963 United Press International used the story, nor and is the author of Final Judgement: The Story of Nuremberg. Mr. Gordon, who was educated at Columbia did they request any check on it that weekend and NYU, is an editorial consultant to The Nation and from their correspondents in Guatemala. has been a news correspondent in Cuba. On Monday, Mr. Gordon was again in touch with the UPI, this time speaking to Francis L. trained in guerilla warfare. The object of the training, he said, was to combat invasions of McCarthy, head of the service's Latin American the type that have occurred recently in Hon- desk. "Yes," said Mr. McCarthy, "there's a big duras, Nicaragua and Panama. base in operation in Guatemala and U. S. planes Five days later, on November 25, the York are flying in and out. But the Pentagon denies Gazette and Daily shed light on how the AP had any knowledge and the State Department says been handling developments: `no comment.' One story we hear is that the base The Gazette and Daily asked the AP . to is being built by the U.S. as a replacement for check [The Nation's] report. The AP said The Guantanamo." Nation article seemed "thin"—an adjective which, At this stage, knowledge of the base follows we think, fairly describes any story as it begins an interesting geographic distribution pattern. to develop from hearsay or second-hand sources La . But when we explained that we were not The readers of the Guatemalan newspaper requesting a rewrite of The Nation article but Hora knew there was a base. Indeed, according rather a check in Guatemala, the AP went to to Andrew Tully in his CIA: The Inside Story, work. Within a few days, the AP sent a story "Practically everybody in Central America knew which was printed on page two of the Gazette about this [Retalhuleu] training base and, of and Daily on November 17, headlined: "Guate- mala President Denies Reports of Anti-Castro course, so (lid Fidel Castro." In the United Force." The headline reasonably sums up the States, however, where by repute exists the story; the AP had interviewed President Ydigo- freest and most efficient press in the world, ap- ras of Guatemala and he had "branded as false" parently the only people who knew about the the things The Nation had published. base were Dr. Hilton, Mr. McCarthy, and the Now for the windup. In a letter from Stan- ford dated November 19, Dr. Ronald Hilton assorted readership (totaling fewer than 100,- writes as follows: "On Friday, November 18, 000) of the Hispanic American Report, The Mr. [Lyman B.] Kirkpatrick [Jr.], the Inspector Nation and the York (Pa.) Gazette and Daily General of the CIA, spoke in San Francisco at which—alone among the country's dailies—had the Commonwealth Club. He was asked, published The Nation's release in its issue of 'Professor Hilton of Stanford says there is a CIA-financed base in Guatemala where plans are November 12. being made for an attack on Cuba. Professor What of The New York Times, the 'anima Hilton says it will be a black day for Latin Thule of the publicist? Mr. Gordon sent four America and the U.S. if this takes place. Is this copies of the editorial to the Times—one each true?' After a long silence, Mr. Kirkpatrick to the city and national editors, another to replied: 'It will be a black day if we are found Herbert L. Matthews (editorial writer) and out. ' " another to Peter Kihss (a staff reporter who In lying to both the Times man and the AP was then covering domestic aspects of the Cuban reporter, President Ydigoras displayed the vir- situation). Additionally, the city and national tue of consistency, at least. But there is another, desks of the Times, as well as those of other more significant, observation to be made about rnaj m• news media, received copies over the PR these two dispatches. Neither reporter took the Newswire, a private Teletype circuit. Mr. Gor- - elementary journalistic step (or, if they took it, don followed dispatch of the proofs by phone failed to report that they did so) of interview- calls to Mr. Kihss and others; all professed in- ing anyone on the staff of La Hora, which had terest in the story, and Mr. Gordon was asked published the story the previous October 30. At where Dr. Hilton could be reached. the very least, they should have seen—or re- It took nine days for the Times to react. On ported an attempt to see—the newspaper's pub- page 32 of its issue of November 20, it printed lisher, Clemente Marroquin Rojas, who was then an unsigned dispatch from Guatemala City based a member of the Ydigoras cabinet (and is today on its correspondent's interview with President Vice President of Guatemala). Moreover, ac- Miguel Ydigoras Fuentes. The President was cording to Dr. Hilton, the base and its purposes asked about "repeated reports" of a "base estab- were "common knowledge" in the country ; should lished with U. S. assistance as a training ground not the reporters have been instructed, at the for military action against Cuba." The article very minimum, to test this "common knowl- continued edge"? It is precisely for this purpose, as any The President branded the reports as a "lot of journalist will tell you, that taxi drivers have lies." He said the base . was one of several been invented. But both correspondents chose to on which Guatemalan Army personnel was being go to the one man in the country who would be sure to deny the story—the President. soldier had dismissed all stories about the base There was, perhaps, some excuse for the AP as "Communist propaganda." correspondent, Albarao Contreras, who was a Even with these tentative conclusions, Mr. Guatemalan citizen and could hardly be expected Dudman had censorship troubles and in the end to probe into government secrets for the meager filed his story not out of Guatemala, but out of space rates paid to him as a "stringer." But neighboring El Salvador.
Recommended publications
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Anthony D'agostino Department of History
    CURRICULUM VITAE Anthony D’Agostino Department of History San Francisco State University San Francisco, CA 94132 home address: 4815 Harbord Drive, Oakland, CA 94618 phone: (415) 338 7535 e­mail: [email protected] EDUCATION B.A., University of California, Berkeley, 1959 M.A., University of California, Berkeley, 1962 Graduate Study, University of Warsaw, 1967­68 Ph.D., University of California, Los Angeles, 1971 HONORS AND AWARDS: Teaching Assistantship, UCLA, 1965­66 Teaching Assistantship, UCLA, 1966­67 Research Fellowship, University of Warsaw (Stanford­Warsaw Exchange), 1967­68 Research Assistantship, Russian and East European Studies Center, UCLA, 1968­69 Research Fellowship, Frederick Burk Foundation, San Francisco State University, 1971 Research Fellowship for Younger Humanists, National Endowment for the Humanities, 1973 Research Fellowship in Soviet and East European Studies (Title VIII), U.S. State Department and Hoover Institution, 1986­87 Meritorious Performance and Professional Promise Award, San Francisco State University, 1986­87 Meritorious Performance and Professional Promise Award, San Francisco State University, 1988­89 Choice cites Soviet Succession Struggles on its list of “outstanding academic books” for 1988­89. Encyclopedia Britannica 1989 Yearbook cites Soviet Succession Struggles in its select international bibliography. Performance Salary Increase, San Francisco State University, 1998. MEMBERSHIPS: World Association of International Studies (Stanford) American Historical Association The History Society International Institute of Strategic Studies (London) Royal United Services Institute for Defense Studies (London) Inter­University Seminar on Armed Forces and Society American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies Great War Society Western Social Science Association Northern California World Affairs Council Electronic mail groups H­Russia, H­Diplo, H­Ideas, H­World, Johnson’s Russia List and others.
    [Show full text]
  • Invasione Della Baia Dei Porci
    Invasione della baia dei Porci L'invasione della baia dei Porci fu il fallito tentativo da parte di esuli cubani e di mercenari, addestrati dal- la CIA, di conquistare Cuba, a partire dall'invasione del- la parte sud-ovest dell'isola, per rovesciare il governo di Fidel Castro[1]. L'operazione è conosciuta in inglese come “Bay of the Pigs Invasion” e localmente[2] in spagnolo come “La Batalla de Girón”. L'operazione, programmata dal direttore della CIA Allen Welsh Dulles durante l'amministrazione Eisenhower[3], venne lanciata nell'aprile 1961, neanche tre mesi do- po l'insediamento di John Fitzgerald Kennedy alla presidenza degli Stati Uniti, il quale non approvò l'assalto, infatti decise di non sostenere le forze della CIA con l'esercito americano. Le forze armate cubane, equipag- giate ed addestrate dalle nazioni filo-sovietiche del blocco orientale, sconfissero la forza d'invasione in tre giorni di combattimenti. La forza da sbarco principale prese terra in una spiag- gia chiamata Playa Girón, motivo per cui nei paesi su- damericani il fatto è noto anche come “battaglia di Gi- rón” o semplicemente “Playa Girón”. Il piano prepara- to dal 5412 Committee della CIA, il 16 marzo 1960, fu denominato “Programma per un'azione segreta contro il Il memoriale dell'operazione situato nel quartiere di Little regime di Castro” (A Program of Covert Action against Havana a Miami in Florida. the Castro Regime)[4],[5] ed in seguito chiamato “opera- zione Zapata”, dal nome geografico della zona da con- quistare (Ciénaga de Zapata) o dalla società finanziaria occidentali, ed erano decisi a riportare l'isola sotto la sfera Zapata di proprietà di Jeorge Bush.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Hill Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt809nd82d Online items available Register of the Charles Hill papers Finding aid prepared by Grace Hawes Hoover Institution Library and Archives © 2007 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6003 [email protected] URL: http://www.hoover.org/library-and-archives Register of the Charles Hill 89004 1 papers Title: Charles Hill papers Date (inclusive): 1898-2006 Collection Number: 89004 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Library and Archives Language of Material: English Physical Description: 157 manuscript boxes, 6 oversize boxes, 9 card file boxes, 1 cubic foot box, 2 envelopes(70.9 Linear Feet) Abstract: Collection includes correspondence, speeches and writings, dispatches, memoranda, reports, notes, printed matter, memorabilia, and photographs, relating to international relations and diplomacy, American foreign policy during the presidential administration of Ronald Reagan, and the Chinese Cultural Revolution. Also contains speeches and writings of Secretary of State George Shultz. Digital copies of select records also available at https://digitalcollections.hoover.org. Creator: Shultz, George Pratt, 1920- Creator: Hill, Charles, 1936- Hoover Institution Library & Archives Access "Boxes 39-51 closed. The remainder of the collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least two business days in advance of intended use." Publication Rights For copyright status, please contact the Hoover Institution Library & Archives Acquisition Information Materials were acquired by the Hoover Institution Library & Archives between 1989 and 2011. Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Charles Hill papers, [Box no., Folder no. or title], Hoover Institution Library & Archives Alternate Forms Available Digital copies of select records also available at https://digitalcollections.hoover.org.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cuban Missile Crisis: Trading the Jupiters in Turkey? Author(S): Barton J
    The Cuban Missile Crisis: Trading the Jupiters in Turkey? Author(s): Barton J. Bernstein Source: Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 95, No. 1 (Spring, 1980), pp. 97-125 Published by: The Academy of Political Science Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2149587 Accessed: 10-10-2016 11:05 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2149587?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms The Academy of Political Science, Wiley are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Political Science Quarterly This content downloaded from 95.183.180.42 on Mon, 10 Oct 2016 11:05:51 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms The Cuban Missile Crisis: Trading the Jupiters in Turkey? BARTON J. BERNSTEIN President John F. Kennedy has been variously praised and blamed for his handling of, the Cuban missile crisis in October 1962. For most, it was his great triumph: seven days of wide-ranging deliberations and careful planning; and six days of the shrewd use of cautious threats, limited force,- and wise diplomacy to achieve victory.1 For critics, however, it was an unnecessary crisis, or dangerously mishandled, or both: Kennedy should either have acceded to the Soviet missiles in Cuba, or at least tried private diplomacy before moving to the quarantine.
    [Show full text]
  • Trinity University Special Collections and Archives Finding Aid
    Trinity University Special Collections and Archives Finding Aid - Ronald Hilton Papers and Audio Materials (SC.010) Generated by Access to Memory (AtoM) 2.4.0 Printed: January 17, 2019 Language of description: English DACS Trinity University Special Collections and Archives 1 Trinity Place San Antonio, TX United States 78212 Telephone: 210.999.7355 Email: [email protected] http://trinity-archives.accesstomemory.org/index.php/ronald-hilton-papers-and-audio-materials Ronald Hilton Papers and Audio Materials Table of contents Summary information ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Administrative history / Biographical sketch .................................................................................................. 4 Scope and content ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Arrangement .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Notes ................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Access points ................................................................................................................................................... 6 Series descriptions ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • From Monarchy to Civil War an Eye Witness Account By
    Page 1 of 71 SPAIN, 1931-36 From Monarchy to Civil War An Eye Witness Account by Ronald Hilton Professor Emeritus, Stanford University President, World Association of International Studies FOREWORD I believe, alas, that I am unique in one way. I am the only living Hispanist who witnessed the drama of Spain’s second republic, from the fall of the monarchy to the Civil War, during which I was evacuated. Several distinguished living historians have written about that period, but they were either nor born or were children at the time of the Civil War. I deeply admire the way they have pieced documents together with great industry and skill to write detailed accounts of the period. They have urged me to write this account of my experiences, since I can convey my personal impressions. I therefore do so, feeling like Æneas ordered by Queen Dido to tell the story of the fall of Troy. As Book II of the Æneiad says in the opening line: “Infandum regina jubes renovare dolorem”—”Oh Queen, you ask me to renew an unspeakable sorrow”, and all the pain has come back as I describe the fall of the Spanish Republic. Or later “Sunt lacrimæ rerum, et mentem mortalia tangunt”—”They are the tears of things and mortal events wound the mind”. Some of my best friends died in the Civil War. “Mens meminisse horret”— “my mind shudders as I remember.” Writing this book has revived the bitter memories of those days, when I was lucky to escape with my life. While it is enlightening to read accounts of the political and military events of the period, the war was a human tragedy like the fall of Troy.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Press, the Central Intelligence Agency, and the Cold War
    “A Rising Clamor”: The American Press, the Central Intelligence Agency, and the Cold War Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By David Putnam Hadley, MA Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2015 Dissertation Committee: Peter L. Hahn (co-advisor) Robert J. McMahon (co-advisor) Jennifer Siegel Copyright by David Putnam Hadley 2015 Abstract This dissertation examines the development of relationships between the U.S. press and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) during the Cold War, from shortly before the official creation of the CIA in 1947 to the major congressional investigations of the CIA in 1975-76. This dissertation seeks to answer four related questions. First, what was the nature and origin of the relationships that developed between the press and the CIA? Second, to what use did the CIA attempt to put such relationships? Third, what was the actual impact of press/CIA relationships on reporting? Finally, how did the CIA’s relations with the press affect the development of the agency? The efforts to answer these questions involved two main methods. The first method was an extensive examination of the product of domestic newspapers and journals from 1945 to 1976 that examined the activities of the CIA and the development of the U.S. intelligence system. The second method was archival research in private and institutional collections. I conclude that there was no single relationship formed between the CIA and the press. The CIA did have a program of operationally using reporters, though details remain difficult to determine.
    [Show full text]
  • Ramparts, October 1969 ↓ Sinews of Empire by David Horowitz
    Space for Notes Ramparts, October 1969 ↓ Sinews of Empire by David Horowitz Following the student seizure of Harvard's University Hall last spring, Time magazine reported that Harvard Dean Franklin L. Ford "emphasized that continued rifling of University files could have compromised virtually the entire faculty." This mind- boggling admission (offered in defense of the swift unleashing of police) is but one measure of how far academia has fallen from the ideal of open, critical, independent scholarship. The universities were once thought to constitute a vital, independent, countervailing estate, but the modern university has been converted into an Office of External Research for the State Department, the Pentagon and the international corporations. The postwar takeover of the university was accomplished with less finesse and reserve than a corporate conglomerate customarily shows a newly acquired subsidiary, and it is symbolic that the new management team that was to reorganize the university from "within" was drawn largely from the unlikely and forbidding ranks of the crack American World War II intelligence arm, the OSS (Office of Strategic Services). The university is proverbially the most conservative of institutions - tradition-bound, unable to respond and adapt to changing times. But under the postwar tutelage of its powerful outside mentors, entirely new academic fields of social and political science have been created, which cut effortlessly across traditional academic lines and prerogatives that have so hampered innovations in, for example, black studies. These new international policy disciplines and "area studies" (e.g., Asian Studies) were provided with an avalanche of facilities - buildings, libraries, computer technology. Staffs and faculties were assembled, granted unprecedented autonomy and exalted in one jump to a kind of penthouse status in the academic hierarchy.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Brief Chronology
    Appendix A Brief Chronology 9 March 1952 Former president Fulgencio Batista seizes power in Cuba, suppresses political parties. 26 July 1953 Student militants led by Fidel Castro fail in attempt to take Moncada fort in Santiago de Oriente and set off a popular rebellion; most of those caught are killed. At his trial on 16 October, Castro gives 'History Will Absolve Me'speech. June 1954 CIA-organized Liberation Army stages 'invasion' of Gua­ temala, instigating coup against elected government of Jacobo Arbenz. May 1955 Following a general amnesty, Castro and supporters form 26th of July Movement, go to Mexico to begin planning insurrection. October 1955 Castro tours Cuban communities on US East Coast, or­ ganizing support. 2 December 1956 82 members of 26th of July Movement land from the yacht Granma in Oriente province; a dozen survivors reach the Sierra Maestra; Cuban government claims Cas­ tro is killed. 24-26 Feb. 1957 Series by Herbert L. Matthews in the New York Times proves Castro is alive, inspiring Cuban supporters and US press. March 1957 Three sons of US servicemen at Guantanamo base join rebel band in Sierra Maestra. 19 May 1957 Robert Taber's documentary, 'Rebels of the Sierra Maes­ tra: The Story of Cuba's Jungle Fighters', airs on CBS. 261 WHERE THE BOYS ARE CHRONOLOGY to Castro's charges of US involvement. March 1958 Denunciations of US support for Batista in Congress lead to Eisenhower administration embargo on further 17 March 1960 Eisenhower approves plan for exile invasion. weapons shipments to Cuba. 6 April 1960 New York Times advertisement announces formation of April 1958 General strike by 26th of July Movement in Havana fails.
    [Show full text]
  • LASA Forum Spring 2006
    Latin American Studies Association fSPRING 2006o| VOLUME XXXVII rum| ISSUE 2 IN THIS ISSUE On the Profession La construcción de significado en la historia by MIGUEL LEÓN-PORTILLA Revisioning Latin American and Caribbean Studies: A Geopolitics of Knowledge Approach by ARTURO ESCOBAR Debates Tumultuous Times: LASA in the 1960s The Never-Ending Cold War: The United States, Cuba, and LASA’s Battle for Academic Freedom Political Commentary ¡Más político que cultural! o ¿Cómo llegó en Chile una mujer a la Presidencia? by MARCELA RÍOS TOBAR President Sonia E. Alvarez, University of Massachusetts, Amherst [email protected] Vice President Charles R. Hale, University of Texas, Austin [email protected] Past President Table of Contents Marysa Navarro, Dartmouth College [email protected] EXECUTIVE COUNCIL For term ending April 2006 1 From the President | by SONIA E. ALVAREZ Merilee Grindle, Harvard University 3 LASA to President Bush Joanne Rappaport, Georgetown University George Yúdice, New York University 4 From the Incoming President | by CHARLES R. HALE For term ending October 2007 5 From the Associate Editor | by ARTURO ARIAS José Antonio Aguilar Rivera, Centro de Docencia e Investigación Económica Elizabeth Jelin, Consejo de Investigaciones Científicas ON THE PROFESSION y Tecnológicas 7 La construcción de significado en la historia | by MIGUEL LEÓN-PORTILLA Lynn Stephen, University of Oregon 11 Revisioning Latin American and Caribbean Studies: A Geopolitics of Ex Officio Knowledge Approach | by ARTURO ESCOBAR Frances Aparicio, University of Illinois-Chicago Amalia Pallares, University of Illinois-Chicago Milagros Pereyra-Rojas, University of Pittsburgh DEBATES Peter Ward, University of Texas, Austin Tumultuous Times: LASA in the 1960s FORUM EDITORIAL COMMITTEE Editor 14 Some Personal Trivia about the Early Days | by RICHARD N.
    [Show full text]
  • How Wealth Puts Knowledge in Its Pocket by David Horowitz
    The Universities And The Ruling Class: How Wealth Puts Knowledge In Its Pocket by David Horowitz David Horowitz is associate editor of Ramparts magazine and author of The Free World Colossus and Empire and Revolution. This article • f appeared originally in Ramparts published by: under the titles "Billion Dollar Bay Area Radical Education Project Brains," May 1969, and "Sinews of 491 Guerrero St. Empire," August 1969. It is reprinted San Francisco, Cal. 94ll0 by permission. 15~ The following articles are based upon certain very clear assumptions about the nature and exercise of power in American society. Most political and social scientists are "pluralists" who believe that power in America is widely dispersed and that any particular interest group is preventbd from monopolizing power by the "countervailing" force of other groups. David Horowitz offers a direct and effective challenge to "pluralism" with his assertion that power in America is exercised primarily by a small corporate "ruling class." In order to best understand his assumptions and his method­ ology ("power structure" analysis), one should consult G. William Domhoff, Who Rules America? (Prentice Hall pub., $2.45). In his book, Domhoff asks two important questions: Is there an American upper class, and, if so, is the upper class also a governing class? In both cases, his answer is yes. He finds that there is an upper class consisting of no more than one half of one percent of the American population, and that there is "a national corporate economy . .. run by the same group of several thousand men." These corporate magnates play a decisive role in shaping American domestic and international policy, in huge part through their direct access to government and their domination of such institutions as the mass media, the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Committee for Economic Development, and major universities.
    [Show full text]