Opening Its Doors: India's Emergence on the Global Stage

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Opening Its Doors: India's Emergence on the Global Stage 1 Opening Its Doors: India’s Emergence on the Global Stage JERALD SCHIFF here can be little doubt that India is an emerging global economic Tpower. India’s economic growth has averaged some 8 percent over the past three years, placing it among the world’s fastest growing economies. As a result of more than a decade of solid growth, India’s share of world output, at purchasing-power-parity-adjusted exchange rates, has increased from 4.3 percent in 1990 to 5.9 percent in 2005. Growth has been robust in the face of shocks, including the Asian crisis of 1997–98, several below- par monsoons, and the recent sharp increases in energy prices. In line with good growth, poverty has declined dramatically, with estimates indicating a drop in the poverty rate from 41 percent in 1992–93 to less than 29 per- cent in 2000. The reform process that has helped make this possible—and which began in earnest in 1991—has made steady progress despite several changes in political leadership. Looking ahead, it appears that the broad path of reform—although not the pace or details—is firmly established. And success begets success. India is now more than ever a focus for inter- national investors, who are eager to take part in a new India. India’s recent rapid development has gone hand in hand with a marked opening of its economy. Tariffs have come down dramatically in the last decade, while capital account restrictions are being gradually lifted. During 2003/04–2004/05 India’s imports (including services) rose by 39 percent a year, twice as fast as in 1990–2002, buoyed by strong investment and consumer demand. Exports grew by 37 percent a year, up from 18 percent growth in 1990–2002, as India benefited from the commodity boom and 1 ©International Monetary Fund. Not for Redistribution 2 • OPENING ITS DOORS: INDIA’S EMERGENCE ON THE GLOBAL STAGE expanded into engineering goods, pharmaceuticals, and business services. There is also some evidence that India is increasingly tied into regional pro- duction processes, with Asia’s share in Indian imports rising steadily and with Asia becoming a major destination for India’s exports. Intra-industry trade with China, in particular, is rising rapidly helping plug India into global production networks. India is also integrating into global financial systems and has benefited from rapidly rising capital inflows, including into the Indian stock market. Reflecting these developments, India is playing a more important role in the global economy. A few examples only hint at the changes: • India contributed nearly one-fifth of Asian domestic demand growth over 2000–05. Looking forward, India is slated to be the second- largest demand driver in the region, after China. • India accounts for almost one-quarter of the global portfolio flows to emerging market economies, nearly $12 billion in 2005. • India is the world’s leading recipient of remittances, accounting for about 20 percent of global flows. • India is the world’s leading outsourcing destination and is fast emerg- ing as a top 10 tourism destination. • Indian corporates are emerging as key players in their own right. Reli- ance owns one of the largest refineries in the world, while Tata Steel is among the most efficient producers in the world. Indian firms, in industries including steel and oil, are looking abroad to acquire assets. And Indian corporates are increasingly carrying out their own research and development. In 2004 alone, Indian pharmaceutical companies filed about 200 patents. India’s demographics underline the potential for an extended period of rapid economic growth. India is an extremely young country, and is one of the few large countries forecast to sustain a growing labor force over the next 40 years (Figure 1.1). Estimates point to between 75 million and 110 million entrants to the labor force over the next decade, with the obvious potential to raise the economic output of the country and underpin India’s competitiveness. Also, because working-age people tend to have a higher propensity to save, India should benefit from a favorable saving trend that will help finance investment and fuel rapid growth. Opportunities, but Challenges as Well While India is poised for economic takeoff, continuing success is by no means assured. India’s development path thus far has been considerably ©International Monetary Fund. Not for Redistribution Jerald Schiff • 3 Figure 1.1. Working AgePopulation (In percent of total) 75 70 65 Thailand China 60 Philippines Brazil Indonesia India 55 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Source: United Nations, Population database. different from those of Japan, China, Korea, and the other “Asian tigers” in previous decades. And some of these differences present unique challenges to the country as it moves forward. Growth in India has been led by services rather than manufacturing. While India’s role as an information technology (IT) provider has been well documented, and is a major growth engine for the country, more rapid development of the manufacturing sector will be needed to generate the sort of lower-skilled jobs that can serve as a ladder out of poverty for many. The current employment elasticity of growth in India implies that a 5 percent rise in real GDP leads to only a 2½ percent rise in employment, and unless this is raised substantially, the large number of new workers can become a massive problem for India rather than a boon. India has the potential to be a manufacturing giant, but needs to remove the consider- able roadblocks that industry still faces—notably poor infrastructure, rigid labor laws, and relatively inhospitable business and regulatory environ- ments. Moreover, the reliance on services growth implies a need for a large pipeline of well-trained engineers and scientists, which may not be forth- coming without significant reform of higher education. Second, in contrast to most other Asian economies, almost two-thirds of the population still derives its income from agriculture. While this reflects in part the limited supply of manufacturing jobs, high levels of illiteracy and extreme poverty in rural areas also mean that individuals may lack information about employment opportunities or the means to move else- ©International Monetary Fund. Not for Redistribution 4 • OPENING ITS DOORS: INDIA’S EMERGENCE ON THE GLOBAL STAGE where. A large share of the population relies on subsistence agriculture, and farming remains heavily rain-dependent, with irrigation lacking in many areas. The high correlation between agricultural growth and rainfall in India (about 0.65), illustrates the dependence of growth on rainfall. For India to achieve and sustain the sort of high growth it is targeting—in the range of 8–10 percent a year—productivity in agriculture needs to be raised, but agricultural workers also need to be provided with the basic tools and opportunities to move to new jobs in manufacturing. Third, India’s fiscal deficit and debt remain large, constraining its ability to act in key areas. With general government deficits still in excess of 7 per- cent of GDP and government debt above 85 percent of GDP, the govern- ment’s ability to meet the many urgent needs of its population—notably in rural and urban infrastructure, education, and health care—will depend on its success in raising additional revenues without choking off economic growth and limiting inefficient and low-priority spending. The infrastruc- ture gap remains large with inadequate roads, ports, airports, and power increasingly constraining India’s potential growth (Figure 1.2). Finally, India remains—despite its ongoing reforms—a relatively closed economy. Even though India has received much attention for its role as an outsourcing destination, trade linkages remain comparatively weak. Trade is low when compared to that of other Asian countries that pursued more export-driven growth strategies. India still only accounted for about 1 percent of the global trade in goods and services in 2005. Although trade with other emerging countries in Asia has expanded rapidly, India’s partici- pation in global production chains, while growing, is in its infancy. While the share of intra-industry trade in East Asia trade rose to 75 percent in 1996–2000 from 42 percent in 1986–90 (Zebregs, 2004), it only rose to 18 percent from 12 percent between 1992 and 2001 in India (Cerra, Rivera, and Saxena, 2005). As emphasized throughout this volume, the authorities will need to continue to open the economy to take full advantage of global- ization and ensure that India reaches its full growth potential. The Indian authorities are well aware of the challenges they face and are moving to address them. For example, trade tariffs have been coming down for a decade—most recently in the context of the 2006/07 budget—and there are plans to bring these down further to levels of member coun- tries of the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN)—around 8 percent on average—by 2009. India is also active in bilateral and regional trade liberalization, with the South Asia Free Trade Agreement to begin in 2007, and with ongoing discussions with Mercosur, ASEAN, and China, among others. In addition, capital controls on foreign direct investment (FDI) in India and external commercial borrowing by domestic firms are ©International Monetary Fund. Not for Redistribution Jerald Schiff • 5 Figure 1.2. Measures of Infrastructure Access Telephone Mainlines (Per 1,000 inhabitants) 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Korea Malaysia China Thailand Indonesia India Least developed Roads, Goods Transported countries (Billion tons per km) 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0.96 0 China Korea India Electricity Production (Kwh per capita) 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Korea Malaysia Thailand China India Least Indonesia developed countries Air Transport, Freight (Billion tons per km) 10 8 6 4 2 0 Korea China Malaysia Thailand India Indonesia Source: World Bank, World Development Indicators database.
Recommended publications
  • Preventing Deglobalization: an Economic and Security Argument for Free Trade and Investment in ICT Sponsors
    Preventing Deglobalization: An Economic and Security Argument for Free Trade and Investment in ICT Sponsors U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE CENTER FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION Contributing Authors The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is the world’s largest business federation representing the interests of more than 3 million businesses of all sizes, sectors, and regions, as well as state and local chambers and industry associations. Copyright © 2016 by the United States Chamber of Commerce. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form—print, electronic, or otherwise—without the express written permission of the publisher. Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. 6 Part I: Risks of Balkanizing the ICT Industry Through Law and Regulation ........................................................................................ 11 A. Introduction ................................................................................................. 11 B. China ........................................................................................................... 14 1. Chinese Industrial Policy and the ICT Sector .................................. 14 a) “Informatizing” China’s Economy and Society: Early Efforts ...... 15 b) Bolstering Domestic ICT Capabilities in the 12th Five-Year Period and Beyond ................................................. 16 (1) 12th Five-Year
    [Show full text]
  • Selecting Import Products and Suppliers 409
    Chapter 17 SelectingSelecting Import Import Products andProducts Suppliers and Suppliers TYPES OF PRODUCTS FOR IMPORTATION One of the most important import decisions is the selection of the proper product that serves the market need. In the absence of the latter, one is left with a warehouse full of merchandise with no one interested in buying it. Nevertheless, importing can become a successful and profitable venture so long as sufficient effort and time is invested in selecting the right product for the target market. How does one find the right product to import? The following are differ- ent types of products to consider. Unique Products Products that are unique and different can be appealing to customers be- cause they are a welcome change from the standardized and identical prod- ucts sold in the domestic market. The fact that a product is imported and different is in itself sufficient for many people to purchase the item. However, some studies indicate product uniqueness in terms of cultural appeal to be a relatively less important variable in the purchasing decision of import man- agers (Ghymn, 1983). Less Expensive Products It is quite common to find imports that perform identically to the competi- tor’s product but can be sold at a much lower price. As customers quickly switch allegiance to buy the imported item, it is quite possible to capture a substantial share of the domestic market. Export-Import Theory, Practices, and Procedures, Second Edition 407 408 EXPORT-IMPORT THEORY, PRACTICES, AND PROCEDURES For firms selling in mature markets where there is little or no product dif- ferentiation, cost reduction provides a competitive advantage (Shippen, 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • The Outsourcing Handbook a Guide to Outsourcing
    The Outsourcing Handbook A guide to outsourcing Version 2.0 To start a new section, hold down the apple+shift keys and click to release this object and type the section title in the box below. Contents Introduction 4 Provides a brief overview of what outsourcing is, and describes Deloitte’s approaches to Outsourcing Advisory Services (OAS). 1 Phase 1 – Assess 10 The first phase of the process where requirements are defined and which vendors to engage with are reviewed. 2 Phase 2 – Prepare 16 The second phase of the process where initial vendor selection is undertaken and an RFP produced. 3 Phase 3 – Evaluate 22 The third phase of the process where vendor proposals are evaluated and a short-list of vendors for commercial negotiation is selected. 4 Phase 4 – Commit 30 The fourth phase of the process where contracts are negotiated and a deal agreed. 5 Phase 5 – Transition and Transform 38 The fifth phase of the process where the work and resources are transitioned to the successful vendor. 6 Phase 6 – Optimise 44 The final phase of the process covering the steady-state management of the outsourcing arrangement. To start a new section, hold down the apple+shift keys and click to release this object and type the section title in the box below. Foreword Love it or loathe it, outsourcing is now a permanent feature of business life. As companies search for cheaper and more effective ways of working, handing over non-core functions to lower cost specialists can be an alluring prospect. But before you bring in third parties to run parts of your business, it is worth pausing to consider the risks.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Offshoring and Productivity
    Service Offshoring and Productivity: Evidence from the US∗ Mary Amiti Federal Reserve Bank of New York and CEPR Shang-Jin Wei International Monetary Fund, CEPR and NBER Abstract The practice of sourcing service inputs from overseas suppliers has been growing in response to new technologies that have made it possible to trade in some business and computing services that were previously considered non-tradable. This paper estimates the effects of offshoring on productivity in US manufacturing industries between 1992 and 2000. It finds that service offshoring has a significant positive effect on productivity in the US, accounting for around 10 percent of labor productivity growth during this period. Offshoring material inputs also has a positive effect on productivity, but the magnitude is smaller accounting for approximately 5 percent of productivity growth. Keywords: offshoring, outsourcing, services, productivity JEL Classification: F1 F2 ∗International Research, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 33 Liberty Street, New York, NY 10045, email [email protected]; [email protected]. We would like to thank John Romalis, Caroline Freund, Gordon Hanson, Simon Johnson, Jozef Konings, Aart Kraay, Anna Maria Mayda, Christopher Pissarides, Raghu Rajan, Tony Venables, and seminar participants at the IMF, Georgetown University, the US International Trade Commission and the EIIE conference in Lubljana, Slovenia 2005, for helpful comments. We thank Yuanyuan Chen, Jungjin Lee and Evelina Mengova for excellent research assistance. The views expressed in this Working Paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the Federal Reserve System or the IMF. 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Outsourcing Tariff Evasion: a New Explanation for Entrepot Trade
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES OUTSOURCING TARIFF EVASION: A NEW EXPLANATION FOR ENTREPOT TRADE Raymond Fisman Peter Moustakerski Shang-Jin Wei Working Paper 12818 http://www.nber.org/papers/w12818 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 January 2007 * Associate Professor, 823 Uris Hall, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, phone: (212) 854-9157; fax: (212) 854-9895; email:[email protected]. **Senior Associate, Booz Allen Hamilton, 101 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10178, phone: (212) 551-6798, fax: (212) 551-6732, email: [email protected] *** Assistant Director and Chief of the Trade and Investment Division, Research Department, IMF, 700 19th Street NW, Washington, DC 20431, and Research Associate and Director of the Working Group on the Chinese Economy, National Bureau of Economic Research, phone: 202/797-6023, fax: 202/797-6181, [email protected]. www.nber.org/~wei. We thank Jahangir Aziz, Lee Branstetter, Mihir Desai, Martin Feldstein, Wensheng Peng, John Romalis, and participants at NBER and CEPR conferences and a World Bank-IMF joint seminar for helpful comments and Yuanyuan Chen for able research assistance. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. © 2007 by Raymond Fisman, Peter Moustakerski, and Shang-Jin Wei. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Outsourcing Tariff Evasion: A New Explanation for Entrepot Trade Raymond Fisman, Peter Moustakerski, and Shang-Jin Wei NBER Working Paper No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bhuj, India Earthquake of 26 January 2001
    The Bhuj, India Earthquake of 26th January 2001 A FIELD REPORT BY EEFIT Editors: S P G Madabhushi University of Cambridge S K Haigh University of Cambridge Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team Institution of Structural Engineers 11 Upper Belgrave Street London SW1X 8BH Tel: +44 (0)207-235 4535 Fax: +44 (0)207-235 4294 www.eefit.org.uk © EEFIT 2005 January 2005 ISBN 0 901297 37 2 EEFIT gratefully acknowledges the support of its corporate members: Arup Group British Geological Survey BNFL CREA Consultants EQE International Ltd Giffords Halcrow Contents 1. Overview of the Bhuj Earthquake of 26th January 2001 S P G Madabhushi 2. Geological and Seismological Data of the Bhuj Earthquake S P G Madabhushi & D Patel 3. Geotechnical Aspects of the Bhuj Earthquake S P G Madabhushi, D Patel & S K Haigh 4. Performance of Bridges, Ports and Industrial Facilities J M Barr & A Stewart 5. Building Structures A Thompson, A Kirby & P Greening 6. Performance of Low Rise Buildings R J Spence, D del Re & D Patel 7. Summary S P G Madabhushi Overview of the Bhuj Earthquake 1 Overview of the Bhuj Earthquake Dr S P G Madabhushi, Team Leader University of Cambridge 1.1 Background A powerful earthquake rocked the western state of Gujarat in India at 08:46 hours (Indian Standard Time) on the 26th January 2001. The earthquake was estimated by USGS to have a Moment Magnitude of 7.9. The epicentre was reported to be near a major town called Bhuj in the Kachchh region of Gujarat. Fig.1 shows the location of the epicentre.
    [Show full text]
  • Outsourcing Tariff Evasion: a New Explanation for Entrepôt Trade
    WP/05/102 Revised: 6/3/05 Outsourcing Tariff Evasion: A New Explanation for Entrepôt Trade Raymond Fisman, Peter Moustakerski, and Shang-Jin Wei © 2005 International Monetary Fund WP/05/102 Revised: 6/3/05 IMF Working Paper Research Department Outsourcing Tariff Evasion: A New Explanation for Entrepôt Trade Prepared by Raymond Fisman, Peter Moustakerski, and Shang-Jin Wei1 May 2005 Abstract This Working Paper should not be reported as representing the views of the IMF. The views expressed in this Working Paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the IMF or IMF policy. Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit comments and to further debate. Traditional explanations for indirect trade carried out through an entrepôt have focused on savings in transport costs and on the role of specialized agents in processing and distribution. We provide an alternative perspective based on the possibility that entrepôts may facilitate tariff evasion. Using data on direct exports to mainland China and indirect exports to it via Hong Kong SAR, we find that the indirect export rate rises with the Chinese tariff rate, even though there is no legal tax advantage to sending goods via Hong Kong SAR. We undertake a number of extensions to rule out plausible alternative hypotheses. JEL Classification Numbers: H2, F1 Keywords: Tax Evasion, Indirect Trade, Corruption Author(s) E-Mail Address: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] 1 The authors would like to thank Jahangir Aziz, John Romalis, Lee Branstetter, and participants in a National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) conference and a World Bank-IMF joint seminar for helpful comments and Yuanyuan Chen for able research assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Customs Compliance Procedures
    Since 2014, Irish Traders are required to provide customs CUSTOMS COMPLIANCE authorities with information, by way of an Electronic Manifest Declaration, of all vessels/aircraft PROCEDURES carrying goods into and out of Ireland, both Community and non- Community. The Union Customs Code is in place from May 2016. Penalties have been introduced in the 2011 Finance Act which focuses attention on the administration responsibilities for correct submission of SAD returns. Failure to make correct declarations also brings closer the possibility of a Customs audit. Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) certifications have achieved substantial take up across Europe. Mutual Recognition has been agreed between AEO and CTPAT in the USA. However Ireland AEO certification is lagging far behind other EU countries. Lack of AEO certification may encounter delays in clearance by Customs. Course Objectives Feedback from This two day course provides the Exporting, Importing and our participants Logistics companies with a has been valuable update to International Trade excellent in Documentation, Customs, VIES 11 Merrion Square - & INTRASTAT Procedures. Dublin 2 - Ireland assisting them with their Target Audience [email protected] This course is a must for Brexit issues. those management and operational personnel needing +353 (1) 676 6894 to become familiar with Austin Rutledge Customs developments. www.export-edge.com CEO / Educational Course Benefit Director Assurance A detailed review of your customs and trade issues will take place with a pre-course
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Liberalization, Identity Politics and Investment Policies in India
    Economic Liberalization, Identity Politics and Investment Policies in India ∗ Kanta Murali ∗ Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Toronto 100 St. George Street, Toronto M5S 3G3, Canada; Email: [email protected] 1. Introduction From the point of view of an extensive literature on redistribution, a focus on growth- oriented policies in poor democracies, including measures targeted to attract private capital, is very unlikely. Starting with the seminal models of Romer (1975) and Meltzer and Richard (1981), scholars have posited that individuals with lower incomes are likely to favor greater redistribution. At a more macro level, a related set of studies link democracies to redistributive outcomes (e.g., Acemoglu and Robinson 2005; Boix 2003). Some scholars also suggest that democracies are better for the welfare of the poor as they provide more social spending and public goods than non-democracies (e.g., Brown and Hunter 1999; Lake and Baum 2001).1 If the poor prefer greater redistribution and democracies have a proclivity to redistribute, we should expect to see poor democracies focusing predominantly on redistributive policies. Given resource constraints in developing countries, policymakers are unlikely to focus on strategies targeted specifically at growth, much less policies directed towards a privileged section such as business, under such circumstances. Yet, India’s growth transformation since 1991 poses a clear challenge to this hypothesis. Catalyzed by a shift in its policy framework, notably a move from a state-dominated system to one where private capital began to play a primary role, India has been one of the fastest growing economies in the world over the last two and a half decades.
    [Show full text]
  • INCOTERMS® 2020 SUMMARY SHEET Note That Clause a Still Excludes Coverage in a Range of Circumstances, Such As War and Strikes
    INCOTERMS® 2020 SUMMARY SHEET Note that Clause A still excludes coverage in a range of circumstances, such as war and strikes. Further, all cargo insurance generally excludes coverage for consequential loss (flow-on effects such as loss of profit or loss of opportunity as a result of lost or damaged goods, for example). Is it worth increasing costs with higher premiums for wider coverage? Or is better to expose your cargo to further risk at a more affordable premium? Consider which cargo insurance policy is more appropriate for your business goals. INCLUSION OF SECURITY REQUIREMENTS Incoterms® 2020 makes security obligations more prominent. Screening of containers in certain circumstances is now compulsory. New provisions in Incoterms® 2020 distribute security responsibilities between vendor and purchaser, so it is critical to review where each party is responsible and what measures must be introduced. MOVEMENT OF GOODS BY OWN TRANSPORTATION Incoterms® 2020 now enable that parties to use their own transport for carrying goods, rather than outsourcing transport to a third-party carrier (which had been assumed in Incoterms® 2010). The FCA, DAP, DPU and DDP have been updated to reflect this clarification. CHANGING THE WORDING OF THE INCOTERMS DOCUMENT Incoterms® 2020 have been reworded to make it more relevant and more easily understood. Now there are explanatory notes outlining the fundamental nature of each of the Incoterms®. Costs are better presented, creating an easy list of costs all in one place. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS It’s really important that both importers and exporters pay close attention their contract of sale. The Incoterm used needs to align with all the other terms used in the contract which deal with things like transportation and finance.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Housing in India- a Statistical Compendium 2013 Size
    lR;eso t;rs STATESTATE OFOF HOUSINGHOUSING ININ INDIAINDIA STATE OF HOUSING IN INDIA STATE AA STATISTICALSTATISTICAL COMPENDIUMCOMPENDIUM 20132013 A STATISTICAL COMPENDIUM 2013 A STATISTICAL lR;eso t;rs Director (NBO) & OSD (JNNURM & RAY) Ministry of Housing & Urban Poverty Alleviation Room No. – 210, G-Wing, NBO Building, lR;eso t;rs Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi – 110108 Government of India Tel:- +91-11-23061692, Fax : +-91-11-23061542 Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation E-mail:- [email protected] National Buildings Organisation Hkkjr esa vkoklksa dh fLFkfr STATE OF HOUSING IN INDIA A STATISTICAL COMPENDIUM 2013 Government of India Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation National Buildings Organisation 1 LIST OF TABLES 1 Total Number of Census Houses: Rural & Urban-2011. 2 Total Number of Households: Rural & Urban -2011. 3 Distribution of Occupied Census Houses -2011. 4 Distribution of Census Houses by Predominant Material of Roof -2011. 5 Distribution of Census Houses by Predominant Material of Wall -2011. 6 Distribution of Census Houses by Predominant Material of Floor-2011. Distribution of Occupied Houses used as Residence and Residence- cum -Other Uses by their 7 Habitable Condition -2011. 8 Distribution of Households Living in Census Houses by Predominant Material of Roof -2011. 9 Distribution of Households Living in Census Houses by Predominant Material of Wall -2011. 10 Distribution of Households Living in Census Houses by Predominant Material of Floor -2011. 11 Distribution of Households by Their Habitable Condition of Census Houses Occupied -2011. 12 Distribution of Households Having Number of Dwelling Rooms -2011. 13 Distribution of Households by Ownership Status of the Census Houses Occupied by them -2011.
    [Show full text]
  • The Benefits and Costs of Outsourcing Jobs
    The Park Place Economist Volume 12 Issue 1 Article 10 March 2008 Opinion: The Benefits and Costs of Outsourcing Jobs George Coontz '04 Illinois Wesleyan University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/parkplace Recommended Citation Coontz '04, George (2004) "Opinion: The Benefits and Costs of Outsourcing Jobs," The Park Place Economist: Vol. 12 Available at: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/parkplace/vol12/iss1/10 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Commons @ IWU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this material in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This material has been accepted for inclusion by faculty at Illinois Wesleyan University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ©Copyright is owned by the author of this document. Opinion: The Benefits and Costs of Outsourcing Jobs This article is available in The Park Place Economist: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/parkplace/vol12/iss1/10 Opinion: The Benefits and Costs of Outsourcing Jobs George Coontz With today’s consumer stretching the dollar try, then this country possesses the comparative ad- further and further, tremendous competitive pres- vantage. This country should elect to produce this sure has been put on U.S. companies trying to com- good or service, while the other country should pro- pete with foreign companies.
    [Show full text]