DOCSLIB.ORG

KFLG Procedures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
KFLG Procedures 20086 FLAGSTAFF PULLIAM (FLG) AIRPORT DIAGRAM AL-5034 (FAA) FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA ATIS 125.8 FLAGSTAFF TOWER 134.55 239.25 GND CON 121.9 D BLAST PAD 200 X 190 35°09'N A 1 1 2 ELEV 6996 A ° .9 E 210 ° 3 . 10 R A VA 2 A SW-4, 07 OCT 2021 to 04 NOV JANUARY 2020 ANNUAL RATE OF CHANGE 0.1° W A 3 TWR 7069 A FIRE 4 RWY 03-21 STATION PCN 37 F/D/W/T A S-30, D-95, 2D-140 TERMINAL A 5 0 5 1 X 8800 HANGARS A 6 SW-4, 07 OCT 2021 to 04 NOV FBO A 7081 7 A A 8 35°08'N A ° .9 A 030 9 FIELD 3 ELEV ELEV 7015 BLAST PAD 7014 200 X 190 CAUTION: BE ALERT TO RUNWAY CROSSING CLEARANCES. READBACK OF ALL RUNWAY HOLDING INSTRUCTIONS IS REQUIRED. 111°41'W 111°40'W FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA AIRPORT DIAGRAM FLAGSTAFF PULLIAM (FLG) 20086 (FLG1.OATES)17341 FLAGSTAFF PULLIAM (FLG) AL-5034 (FAA) FLAGSTAFF ONE DEPARTURE FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA ATIS TOP ALTITUDE: 125.8 12000 PHOENIX DEP CON 126.375 236.775 FLAGSTAFF TOWER 134.55 (CTAF) 239.25 FLAGSTAFF GND CON 113.85 FLG 72 121.9 1 - Chan 85(Y) R TAKEOFF MINIMUMS ° Rwys 3, 21: Standard. 207 146 ° SW-4, 07 OCT 2021 to 04 NOV ° 2 7 1 7 . 16 OATES DRAKE N34°52.21' 114.1 DRK W111°42.56' Chan 88 L-8 61 R-0 10500 SW-4, 07 OCT 2021 to 04 NOV NOTE: Chart not to scale. T DEPARTURE ROUTE DESCRIPTION TAKEOFF RUNWAY 3: Climbing right turn heading 207° and FLG R-172 to OATES INT, cross at or above 10500, thence. TAKEOFF RUNWAY 21: Climbing left turn heading 146° and FLG R-172 to OATES INT, cross at or above 10500, thence. .as assigned by ATC, continue climb to MEA/MCA for direction of flight. FLAGSTAFF ONE DEPARTURE FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA FLAGSTAFF PULLIAM (FLG) (FLG1.OATES)07DEC17 FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA AL-5034 (FAA) 19115 Rwy Idg LOC I-FLG APP CRS 7000 TDZE 7003 ILS or LOC RWY 21 214° Apt Elev 7014 FLAGSTAFF PULLIAM (FLG) T Autopilot coupled approach NA below 7640 feet. DME MALSR MISSED APPROACH: Climb to 7500, then climbing A required. DME from FLG VOR/DME. Simultaneous reception left turn to 11000 on heading 130° and FLG R-172 to of I-FLG and FLG DME required. For inop ALS increase OATES INT/FLG VOR/DME 16.7 DME and hold, 7 A5 S-ILS 21 all Cats visibility to 8 . continue climb-in-hold to 11000. ATIS PHOENIX APP CON FLAGSTAFF TOWER GND CON UNICOM 125.8 126.375 236.775 134.55(CTAF) L 239.25 121.9 122.95 8957 FLG 25 N SA M 135 10418 M 8938 ° 14100 ° 9000 (IF) 225 11500 8000 ZAMAB INT INW 35.7 10600 10000 ° 315 R 045 -284 ° 9800 12633 4 3 ° 10200 0 (IAF) 9516 214° (6) CALGU INT 259° 10500 (IAF) INW 28 079° N 9000 FIMAL ° 284 oP 80 T ( ° 00 FLG 10.2 7. SW-4, 07 OCT 2021 to 04 NOV 214 7) 9388 Final approach course offset 3.00° 10500 to CALGU 284° (28) HEVMU 8047 12300 to FIMAL FLG 4.9 R-053 033° (10.2) WINSLOW FLAGSTAFF 112.6 INW 113.85 FLG 7389 Chan 73 Chan 85 (Y) 8045 SOLBE Procedure NA for arrivals at INW 7089 FLG 0.9 VORTAC on V12-264 eastbound. ) MISSED G Y L ( F APCH FIX 85 85 172 . - n R LOCALIZER 110.5 OATES a h 172 SW-4, 07 OCT 2021 to 04 NOV 113 - C I I-FLG FLG 16.7 R LF G ELEV 7014 D TDZE 7003 RK .1 D ° 114 214° 9.9 NM R-061 ° 172 n 88 from FAF Cha 352 7712 A5 7500 11000 OATES FIMAL 21 FLG FLG 10.2 Remain R-172 7071 hdg within 10 NM 130° 034 P ° LOC only HEVMU 10200 TWR * FLG 0 * 7069 FLG 4.9 12300 15 1.3 LOC X 214° SOLBE 8800 7081 FLG 0.9 10200 * GS 3.00° 8500 P TCH 52 3 0.4 0.5 3.7 NM 5.3 NM CATEGORY A B C D 1 1 S-ILS 21 7258-2 255 (300- 2 ) 1 1 S-LOC 21 7340-2 337 (400- 2 ) 7520-1 7560-1 8100-3 8560-3 C CIRCLING HIRL Rwy 3-21 L 506 (600-1) 546 (600-1) 1086 (1100-3) 1546 (1600-3) FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA FLAGSTAFF PULLIAM (FLG) Amdt 1 07DEC17 35°08'N-111°40'W ILS or LOC RWY 21 FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA AL-5034 (FAA) 19115 WAAS Rwy Idg 7000 APP CRS RNAV (GPS) RWY 21 CH 99341 TDZE 7003 214° W21A Apt Elev 7014 FLAGSTAFF PULLIAM (FLG) T For uncompensated Baro-VNAV systems, LNAV/VNAV NA below MALSR MISSED APPROACH: Climb to 7500 -19 °C (2°F) or above 44°C (111°F). DME/DME RNP-0.3 NA. A then climbing left turn to 10800 direct 7 A For inop ALS, increase LPV all Cats visibility to 8 SM. 5 HOXOL and hold. ATIS PHOENIX APP CON FLAGSTAFF TOWER GND CON UNICOM 125.8 126.375 236.775 134.55(CTAF) L 239.25 121.9 122.95 10000 W21 2 12633 R 5 N (IF) A S M ZAMAB M 9516 14100 ° 10200 9000 ) 80 214(6 00 10200 (FAF) 297 FIMAL (13 ° 9388 ) (IAF) CAXAN HEDRU Final approach course offset 2.99°. SW-4, 07 OCT 2021 to 04 NOV 5 NM to RW21 7389 JEPET 2.7 NM to RW21 8045 RW21 7089 7102 ° ) 8 . 007 10200 15 ( 7712 Procedure NA for arrival at HOXOL on V12-264 southwest bound. SW-4, 07 OCT 2021 to 04 NOV 7 NM ELEV 7014 D TDZE 7003 8745 076° 80 256° 00 HOXOL 214° to 7500 10800 HOXOL RW21 FIMAL ZAMAB CAXAN JEPET 5 NM to 10200 A 5 2.7 NM to RW21 21 LNAV only * RW21 *1 NM to 214° 10200 7071 RW21 RW21 10200 P 8640* TWR 7900* GP 3.00° 7069 50 TCH 52 1 X 1 NM 1.7 NM 2.3 NM 4.9 NM 6 NM 8800 7081 CATEGORY A B C D 1 1 P LPV DA 7258-2 255 (300- 2 ) 3 LNAV/ 5 5 DA 7319- 316 (400- 8 ) VNAV 8 1 1 5 5 LNAV MDA 7360-2 357 (400- 2 ) 7360- 8 357 (400- 8 ) 7520-1 7560-1 8100-3 8560-3 HIRL Rwy 3-21 L C CIRCLING 506 (600-1) 546 (600-1) 1086 (1100-3) 1546 (1600-3) FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA FLAGSTAFF PULLIAM (FLG) Orig 07DEC17 35°08'N-111°40'W RNAV (GPS) RWY 21 FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA AL-5034 (FAA) 19115 WAAS Rwy Idg APP CRS 8800 CH45718 TDZE 7014 RNAV (GPS) RWY 3 031° W03A Apt Elev 7014 FLAGSTAFF PULLIAM (FLG) T For uncompensated Baro-VNAV systems, LNAV/VNAV MISSED APPROACH: Climb to 7500 then climbing NA below -19°C (-2°F) or above 44°C (112°F). A right turn to 9500 direct TAWNE and hold. DME/DME RNP-0.3 NA. ATIS PHOENIX APP CON FLAGSTAFF TOWER GND CON UNICOM 125.8 126.375 236.775 134.55(CTAF) L 239.25 121.9 122.95 9388 8047 Procedure NA for arrivals at FLG VOR/DME on V291 eastbound. 7389 FLAGSTAFF 8045 FLG 7 NM 083 7089 ° 9900 to SEZCY RW03 209° (12) TAWNE 263 7101 ° YEDUV SW-4, 07 OCT 2021 to 04 NOV 3.5 NM to RW03 (FAF) TOHQU ° 8700 31) 0 6 (IF/IAF) ( 7712 SEZCY W03 2 R 5 A N 8745 S M M ° ° 80 14100 031 00 211 T 9600 P o N 7 NM ° 311 ) N ( 033 1 9 o 9600 . P .3 ° T (16 ) (IAF) SW-4, 07 OCT 2021 to 04 NOV OATES ELEV 7014 D TDZE 7014 (IAF) JUWSO 7500 9500 SEZCY TAWNE 7 NM TOHQU Holding Pattern A YEDUV 5 211° 21 9600 8700 3.5 NM to *LNAV only 031° RW03 031 7071 ° *0.9 NM to RW03 P 8700 RW03 TWR *8160 7069 GP 3.00° 150 X TCH 50 8800 6 NM 1.6 NM 2.6 NM 0.9 NM 7081 CATEGORY A B C D P 3 3 LPV DA 7264-4 250 (300- 4 ) 3 LNAV/ 7 7 DA 7282- 8 268 (300- 8 ) VNAV 031° to RW03 LNAV MDA 7360-1 346 (400-1) 7520-1 7560-1 8100-3 8560-3 C CIRCLING HIRL Rwy 3-21 L 506 (600-1) 546 (600-1) 1086 (1100-3) 1546 (1600-3) FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA FLAGSTAFF PULLIAM (FLG) Amdt 1 07DEC17 35°08'N-111°40'W RNAV (GPS) RWY 3 FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA AL-5034 (FAA) 19115 VOR/DME FLG Rwy Idg 7000 APP CRS VOR RWY 21 113.85 TDZE 7003 236° Chan 85 (Y) Apt Elev 7014 FLAGSTAFF PULLIAM (FLG) T Rwy 21 helicopter visibility reduction below 1 SM NA. MALSR MISSED APPROACH: Climbing left turn to A DME required. Inop table does not apply to S-21 Cats A/B. 11000 on heading 130° and FLG R-172 to Night landing: Rwy 21, operational VGSI required, remain A 5 OATES INT/16.7 DME, continue climb-in-hold. on or above VGSI glidepath until threshold. ATIS PHOENIX APP CON FLAGSTAFF TOWER GND CON UNICOM 125.8 126.375 236.775 134.55(CTAF) L 239.25 121.9 122.95 10418 8938 9000 8000 10000 12633 9516 DME REQUIRED (IAF) 9000 MAZDA 8000 FLG 17 9000 NoPT 236° (5) R-056 SW-4, 07 OCT 2021 to 04 NOV 9388 FLAGSTAFF 113.85 FLG ° 281 236 101 ° Chan 85(Y) 11500 to SHEFF ° 056° (12) 8800° 236 (IF/IAF) (6) SHEFF 7389 FLG 12 ZASIG FLG 25 A N FLG 6 S M M 135 8045 14100 ZESUP ° ° FLG 1 7089 225 11500 10600 5° 315 ) 04 MISSED G Y 9800 L ( F ° APCH FIX 85 85 172 SW-4, 07 OCT 2021 to 04 NOV .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • La Paz Transportation Planning Study
    LaLa PazPaz TTransportationransportation PlanningPlanning StudyStudy ExecutiveExecutive SummarySummary June 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PURPOSE .................................................................................................... 1 STUDY PROCESS.......................................................................................... 1 AGENCY COORDINATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ................................... 3 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE (TITLE VI) POPULATIONS...................................... 5 FUTURE GROWTH AREAS ............................................................................. 5 FUTURE ROAD AND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS .................................................... 8 FUTURE MULTIMODAL CONDITIONS............................................................12 FUTURE FREIGHT CONDITIONS....................................................................12 MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN .......................................................12 TRANSPORTATION VISION...........................................................................13 ALTERNATIVE ROAD NETWORK ANALYSIS...................................................13 RECOMMENDED ROAD PLAN ......................................................................21 RECOMMENDED MULTIMODAL ELEMENT....................................................27 RECOMMENDED FREIGHT ELEMENT............................................................30 IMPLEMENTATION .....................................................................................33 FUNDING SOURCES
    [Show full text]
  • Brenda SEZ Analysis: Draft PEIS
    1 8 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR 2 PROPOSED SOLAR ENERGY ZONES IN ARIZONA 3 4 5 8.1 BRENDA 6 7 8 8.1.1 Background and Summary of Impacts 9 10 11 8.1.1.1 General Information 12 13 The proposed Brenda Solar Energy Zone (SEZ) is located in La Paz County in west- 14 central Arizona (Figure 8.1.1.1-1), 32 mi (52 km) east of the California border. The SEZ has a 15 total area of 3,878 acres (16 km2). In 2008, the county population was 20,005, while adjacent 16 Riverside County to the west in California had a population of 2,087,917. The towns of 17 Quartzsite and Salome in La Paz County are about 18 mi (29 km) west of, and 18 mi (29 km) 18 east of, the SEZ respectively. The Phoenix metropolitan area is approximately 100 mi (161 km) 19 to the east of the SEZ, and Los Angeles is approximately 230 mi (370 km) to the west. 20 21 The nearest major road access to the SEZ is via U.S. 60, which runs southwest to 22 northeast, along the southeast border of the Brenda SEZ. The nearest railroad stop is 11 mi 23 (18 km) away. The nearest airports serving the area are the Blythe and Parker (Avi Suquilla) 24 Airports, both approximately 50 mi (80 km) from the SEZ, and neither of which have scheduled 25 commercial passenger service. The Sky Harbor Airport in Phoenix is 125 mi (201 km) to the 26 east, and Yuma International Airport in Yuma is 104 mi (167 km) to the south, of the SEZ.
    [Show full text]
  • Request for Joint Petition to Amend to Delete TRANS-8
    DOCKETED Docket Number: 09-AFC-06C Project Title: Blythe Solar Power Project - Compliance TN #: 232709 Document Title: Request For Joint Petition To Amend to Delete TRANS-8 Description: N/A Filer: Scott Galati Organization: DayZenLLC Submitter Role: Applicant Representative Submission Date: 4/10/2020 10:58:28 AM Docketed Date: 4/10/2020 BLYTHE SOLAR POWER PROJECT REQUEST FOR JOINT PETITION To AMEND DELETION OF TRANS-8 Submitted by: NextEra Blythe Solar Energy Center, LLC Submitted to: California Energy Commission April 2020 Prepared by: Section 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND NextEra Blythe Solar Energy Center, LLC (Blythe Solar), a wholly owned subsidiary of NextEra Energy Resources LLC, is the current owner of the Blythe Solar Power Project (BSPP). Blythe Solar files this Request For a Joint Petition To Amend1 (Petition) to delete Condition of Certification TRANS-8 which requires that Blythe Solar provide an avigation easement executed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). BLM will not encumber its land with such an avigation easement, therefore making it a legal impossibility for Blythe Solar to comply with TRANS-8. As discussed in this Petition, TRANS-8 was included in the original and amended Final Decisions in order to ensure compliance with a provision requiring an avigation easement in the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission Airport Master Plan (Airport Master Plan). The requirement was determined to be a Law, Ordinance, Regulation, or Standard (LORS) and was not included to mitigate any potential environmental impact. Further research definitely proves that the requirements of the Airport Master Plan are inapplicable to BLM land and therefore should not have been applied to the BSPP as a LORS.
    [Show full text]
  • Single Tenant Investment Opportunity
    1016 S. KOFA AVENUE, PARKER, ARIZONA SINGLE TENANT INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY ACTUAL SITE EXCLUSIVELY MARKETED BY JOE SCHUCHERT FIRST VICE PRESIDENT 610 Newport Center Drive, Suite 1500 Newport Beach, CA 92660 M: 310.971.3116 [email protected] | CA License No. 01973172 JIM SCHUCHERT FIRST VICE PRESIDENT 610 Newport Center Drive, Suite 1500 Newport Beach, CA 92660 M: 310.971.3892 [email protected] | CA License No. 01969414 ED BEEH EVP & MARKET LEADER 3131 E. Camelback Road, Suite 110 Phoenix, AZ 85016 [email protected] | AZ License No. BR032807000 2 REPRESENTATIVE PHOTO / ACTUAL SITE SRS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS-WEST, LLC CONTENTS 4 7 INVESTMENT SUMMARY PROPERTY OVERVIEW OFFERING SUMMARY | INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTS AERIALS | SITE PLAN | LOCATION MAP 17 19 AREA OVERVIEW FINANCIALS DEMOGRAPHICS RENT ROLL | BRAND PROFILE 3 ACTUAL SITE SRS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS-WEST, LLC INVESTMENT SUMMARY SRS is pleased to present the opportunity to acquire the fee simple interest (land and building ownership) in a Family Dollar property located in Parker, Arizona. In 2003, the building was remodeled for Family Dollar and in September 2018 Family Dollar extended the lease for an additional 10 years through December 31, 2028. The lease has three (3) – five (5) year options at 10% rental increases. The NN+ lease has minimal landlord responsibilities that are limited to structure & roof repairs in excess of $2,000 in any lease year. Family Dollar is responsible for the parking lot and HVAC Units. In addition Family Dollar is responsible for roof repairs until the aggregate costs equal $2,000 in any lease year. The lease is guaranteed by Dollar Tree, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Docket 09-Afc- 6 State of California Date Jul 12 2010
    DOCKET 09-AFC-6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DATE JUL 12 2010 Energy Resources Conservation RECD. JUL 12 2010 And Development Commission In the Matter of: Docket No. 09-AFC-6 Application for Certification For the Blythe Solar Power Project Palo Verde Solar, LLC Energy Commission Staff’s Supplemental Staff Assessment Part 2 Please find attached the following outstanding items: Air Quality – Supplemental Testimony and Declaration of Will Walters incorporating the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District’s Final Determination of Compliance. Traffic and Transportation, Aviation Assessment – Testimony of Marie McLean, James Jewell, Clifford Ho, Mark Johnson, and Will Walters. Resumes of James Jewell, Clifford Ho and Mark Johnson. Blythe Airport Risk Assessment, Supplemental Testimony of Dr. Alvin Greenberg. DATED: July 12, 2010 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Lisa M. DeCarlo_________ LISA M. DECARLO Senior Staff Counsel California Energy Commission 1516 9th Street, MS-14 Sacramento, CA 95817 Ph: (916) 654-5195 e-mail: [email protected] AIR QUALITY Supplemental Testimony of William Walters, P.E. INTRODUCTION This second Supplemental Staff Assessment (SSA) for air quality presents changes to the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District (District) Conditions of Certification (CoCs) based on changes contained in the Districts Final Determination of Compliance (FDOC), but does not impact the staff’s findings as presented in the Revised Staff Assessment. The revisions to the District conditions are shown below in underline/strikeout1. The District completed the FDOC for the project on July 8, 2010, which has addressed consistency issues with the conditions for the HTF piping system among other issues (MDAQMD 2010c). These revisions do not change the District’s or staff’s findings regarding compliance with Laws, Ordinances, Regulations and Standards (LORS).
    [Show full text]
  • LAND USE This Chapter Deals with Compatible Land Use
    This page intentionally left blank. Avi Suquilla Airport Master Plan Update 5. AIRPORT LAND USE This chapter deals with compatible land use. It seeks to establish land use patterns on airport property that promote the efficient operation and financial self-sufficiency of the airport while ensuring compatibility with the surrounding community. Off-airport land use planning involves coordinating with surrounding jurisdictions to ensure compatible development on land the airport does not control. This includes coordinating with adjacent communities on their growth plans and continuation of safety and noise overlay zoning that serves to protect the long-term viability of the airport. Land use compatibility refers to a pattern of land uses around the airport which will be most compatible with activities on the airport. The two primary concerns for land use compatibility are maintaining operationally safe and obstruction free approaches and minimizing impacts due to aircraft noise. Ensuring compatible land use is a condition of the grant assurances when accepting federal Airport Improvement Program grants. The applicable grant assurances are as follows: Compatible Land Use: It (the airport sponsor) will take appropriate action, including the adoption of zoning laws, to the extent reasonable, to restrict the use of land adjacent to or in the immediate vicinity of the airport to activities and purposes compatible with normal airport operations, including landing and takeoff of aircraft. In addition, if the project is for noise compatibility program implementation, it will not cause or permit any change in land use, within its jurisdiction, that will reduce its compatibility, with respect to the airport, of the noise compatibility measures upon which federal funds have been expended.
    [Show full text]
  • Region 9 Tribal Underground Storage Tank Sites
    AltFacilityID TankID TankStatusDesc SubstanceDesc OverfillInstalled SpillInstalled AGUA001 1 Permanently Out of Use Used Oil FALSE FALSE AGUA002 1 Permanently Out of Use Gasoline FALSE FALSE AGUA002 2 Permanently Out of Use Diesel FALSE FALSE AGUA002 3 Permanently Out of Use Gasoline FALSE FALSE AGUA002 4 Permanently Out of Use Used Oil FALSE FALSE AGUA003 1 Permanently Out of Use Used Oil FALSE FALSE AGUA003 2 Permanently Out of Use Gasoline FALSE TRUE AGUA004 1 Currently In Use Gasoline TRUE TRUE AGUA004 2 Currently In Use Gasoline TRUE TRUE AGUA004 3 Currently In Use Gasoline TRUE TRUE AGUA004 4 Currently In Use Diesel TRUE TRUE AGUA005 1 Permanently Out of Use Gasoline FALSE FALSE AGUA005 2 Permanently Out of Use Diesel FALSE FALSE AGUA006 1 Permanently Out of Use Used Oil TRUE TRUE AGUA006 2 Permanently Out of Use Gasoline TRUE TRUE AGUA006 3 Permanently Out of Use Gasoline TRUE TRUE AGUA006 4 Permanently Out of Use Gasoline TRUE TRUE AGUA007 1 Permanently Out of Use Diesel FALSE FALSE AGUA008 1 Permanently Out of Use Gasoline TRUE TRUE AGUA008 2 Permanently Out of Use Diesel TRUE TRUE AGUA009 1 Permanently Out of Use Gasoline FALSE FALSE AGUA010 1 Currently In Use Used Oil TRUE TRUE AGUA010 2 Currently In Use Gasoline TRUE TRUE AGUA010 3 Currently In Use Gasoline TRUE TRUE AGUA010 4 Currently In Use Gasoline TRUE TRUE AGUA010 5 Currently In Use Gasoline TRUE TRUE AGUA011 1 Permanently Out of Use Diesel TRUE TRUE AGUA011 2 Currently In Use Diesel TRUE TRUE AGUA012 1 Permanently Out of Use Diesel FALSE FALSE AGUA012 2 Permanently
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Existing Conditions
    This page intentionally left blank. Avi Suquilla Airport Master Plan Update 1. INVENTORY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS 1.1. Introduction The purpose of this Airport Master Plan Update is to present guidelines for development of the Avi Suquilla Airport to meet the needs of the Colorado River Indian Tribes (CRIT), the City of Parker, La Paz County and the surrounding trade area over the next 20 year period. Forecasts of aviation demand will provide the basis for recommended future physical development of airport facilities, including terminal development, instrument approach minimum improvements, future land needs, access requirements, and other infrastructure requirements for 5, 10, and 20 year planning periods. Economic feasibility, funding mechanisms, and timing of proposed developments will be reviewed so that the recommendations are economically practical. Environmental conditions will be documented and considered in the identification and analysis of airport development alternatives. An inventory of present airport facilities, usage, and local economic factors, along with input from airport users, will provide the necessary data and information required to forecast aviation activity and existing and future facilities requirements. Alternatives Development and Evaluation, Chapter 4, will identify and evaluate alternatives for meeting existing and future facilities requirements. Recommended development alternatives will be selected in Chapter 4. The existing airport layout plan drawings will be updated to show the recommended development alternatives in accordance with current FAA criteria. The latest Avi Suquilla Airport Master Plan was completed in April 1997. Numerous changes have occurred at the Airport since completion of the 1997 Master Plan. Major changes include the construction of a relocated Runway 1-19 and connecting taxiways, apron expansion, drainage improvements, and installation of security fencing surrounding airport property.
    [Show full text]
  • National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report
    National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report Location: EAGLE MOUNTAIN, CA Accident Number: LAX93FA149 Date & Time: 03/11/1993, 2020 PST Registration: N2656N Aircraft: CESSNA 421C Aircraft Damage: Destroyed Defining Event: Injuries: 3 Fatal Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General Aviation - Positioning Analysis A CESSNA 421 CRASHED AFTER AN INFLIGHT BREAKUP. INVESTIGATION DISCLOSED THAT THE LEFT OUTBOARD PORTION OF THE ELEVATOR ASSEMBLY (INCLUDING THE BALANCE WEIGHT) SEPARATED FIRST, RESULTING IN EMPENNAGE FLUTTER & SUBSEQUENT IN-FLIGHT BREAKUP OF THE EMPENNAGE. THE LEFT ELEVATOR OUTBOARD HINGE & SUPPORT STRUCTURE EXHIBITED EVIDENCE OF HINGE OVERTRAVEL. THE LEFT HORIZONTAL STABILIZER FRONT SPAR HAD FAILED DOWNWARD; RIVETS THAT ATTACHED THE LEFT OUTBOARD HINGE TO THE REAR SPAR OF THE LEFT STABILIZER HAD SHEARED; AND THE LEFT ELEVATOR CENTER HINGE HAD BEEN PULLED OFF THE REAR SPAR. ABOUT 100 FLIGHT HOURS BEFORE THE ACCIDENT, MAINTENANCE WAS PERFORMED TO REPAIR THE LEFT ELEVATOR BALANCE WEIGHT (WHICH WAS LOOSE) & TO REPAIR A DAMAGED STIFFENER IN THE CENTER STRUCTURE OF THE HORIZONTAL STABILIZER. HOWEVER, WHEN EXAMINED AFTER THE ACCIDENT, THE BALANCE WEIGHT WAS TIGHT & THE REPAIR TO THE STIFFENER WAS INTACT. Probable Cause and Findings The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident to be: FAILURE OF THE LEFT ELEVATOR FOR UNDETERMINED REASON(S), WHICH RESULTED IN FLUTTER AND FAILURE OF THE EMPENNAGE, AND SUBSEQUENT UNCONTROLLED COLLISION WITH THE TERRAIN. Page 1 of 9 Findings Occurrence #1: AIRFRAME/COMPONENT/SYSTEM FAILURE/MALFUNCTION Phase of Operation: CLIMB - TO CRUISE Findings 1. (C) FLIGHT CONTROL,ELEVATOR - UNDETERMINED 2. FLIGHT CONTROL,ELEVATOR ATTACHMENT - OVERLOAD 3. (C) STABILIZER - FLUTTER 4.
    [Show full text]
  • AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE Avi Suquilla Airport the Colorado
    AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE (May 2016 Addendum No. 1) Avi Suquilla Airport Parker, Arizona Prepared For The Colorado River Indian Tribes May 2016 FAA ALP Drawing Approval Prepared By 3302 East Harbor Drive Phoenix, Arizona 85034 “The contents of this plan do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the FAA or ADOT Multimodal Planning Division (MPD). Acceptance of this document by the FAA and ADOT MPD does not in any way constitute a commitment on the part of the United States or the State of Arizona to participate in any development depicted herein nor does it indicate that the proposed development is environmentally acceptable in accordance with applicable public laws.” Avi Suquilla Master Plan-TOC Title Page This page intentionally left blank. Avi Suquilla Master Plan-TOC Title Page Avi Suquilla Airport Master Plan Update A1. ADDENDUM No. 1 – FAA APPROVAL AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN DRAWINGS A1.1 INTRODUCTION Review comments from the FAA addressing the Final Draft of the Master Plan Update and the Airport Layout Plan (ALP) drawing set were received on December 10, 2015. No comments were received from the Arizona Department of Transportation. The FAA did not have any comments on the Master Plan Narrative. The FAA had 16 comments that suggested revisions to the ALP drawing set which were addressed by the Master Plan Team (Airport Management and Master Plan Consultant). A1.2 ADDENDUM HISTORY Addendum No. 1 revised the following in the Master Plan Update Report: • Cover and Title Page – added Addendum No. 1 and date of addendum • Revised Table of Contents – included Addendum No.
    [Show full text]
  • All KGCN Procedures (With Diagram)
    21168 GRAND CANYON NTL PARK (GCN) AIRPORT DIAGRAM AL-5381 (FAA) GRAND CANYON, ARIZONA ATIS 124.3 CANYON TOWER 119.0 35°58'N GND CON 121.9 D HS 1 PRIVATE FIELD PARKING ELEV 6609 21 A ° 1 . B 210 E N ° W 6 . 0 DO 1 % R .0 1 TERMINAL VA AIR CARRIER PARKING JANUARY 2020 ANNUAL RATE OF CHANGE C 6759 0.1° W SW-4, 07 OCT 2021 to 04 NOV GENERAL AVIATION PARKING D NON-MOVEMENT AREA 150 X P E TWR 8999 FIRE STATION 35°57'N P F SW-4, 07 OCT 2021 to 04 NOV ° .1 P P 030 U ELEV % .7 6533 0 3 G RWY 03-21 PCN 52 F/C/W/T S-88, D-108, 2D-160 CAUTION: BE ALERT TO RUNWAY CROSSING CLEARANCES. READBACK OF ALL RUNWAY HOLDING INSTRUCTIONS IS REQUIRED. 112°09'W 112°08'W GRAND CANYON, ARIZONA AIRPORT DIAGRAM GRAND CANYON NTL PARK (GCN) 21168 SW-4, 07 OCT 2021 to 04 NOV 2021 NOV 04 to 2021 OCT 07 SW-4, (PARKS4.PGS) PARKS FOUR DEPARTURE PARKS FOURDEPARTURE (PARKS4.PGS) ATIS TOP ALTITUDE: 124.3 ASSIGNED BY ATC GND CON 121.9 CANYON TOW ER 119.0 N LOS ANGELES CENTER GRAND CANYON 27APR17 111.65 GCN 124.85 319 .2 NCG 21224 ALBUQUERQUE CENTER Chan 53(Y) 128.45 298 .9 UNICOM GUCRU 122.95 .64' N 35°53 ' W 112°25.75 10000 R-239 3 MRA 10000 14 ° 273° 210 14 57 AL-5381 (FAA) -210 V208 10000 239° (57) GRAND CANYONNTLPARK GRAND CANYON NTLPARK R-058 TAKEOFF MINIMUMS 1 ' per NM to 7000.
    [Show full text]
  • La Paz County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
    2017 La Paz County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Developed by: La Paz County Town of Parker Town of Quartzsite LA PAZ COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 LA PAZ COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Background and Scope ..................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Plan Organization ............................................................................................................. 2 SECTION 2: COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................. 3 2.1 General ............................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 County Overview .............................................................................................................. 3 2.3 Jurisdictional Overviews ................................................................................................ 10 2.3.1 Parker ......................................................................................................................... 10 2.3.2 Quartzsite ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]