Cytogenetics: Nomenclature and Disease

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cytogenetics: Nomenclature and Disease Cytogenetics: Nomenclature and Disease Willis Navarro, MD Medical Director, Transplant Services National Marrow Donor Program Overview • Normal Chromosomes – Structure – Genes • Chromosomal Disruptions – Types ofCf Chromosomal Changes • Disruptions and Disease Structural Overview • DNA forms a double helix • Double helix structure is wound around histones • DNA/histone complex then forms the chromosome structure http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/handbook/illustrations/chromosomestructure Cell Division and Cytogenetics • Tissue cells of interest are grown in culture • Cell must be “frozen” at methtaphase – Mitotic inhibitor added – Chromosomes condensed – Cells harvested From: http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://nte-serveur.univ-lyon1.fr/nte/EMBRYON/www.uoguelph.ca/zoology/devobio/miller/mitosis1.gif&imgrefurl=http://nte-serveur.univ- lyon1.fr/nte/EMBRYON/www.uoguelph.ca/zoology/devobio/210labs/mitosis1.html&h=538&w=450&sz=24&tbnid=PXVEm8paeVwJ::&tbnh=132&tbnw=110&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dmitosis&hl =en&usg=__XTdVA_DgEhY6qk-d9HDMvHcVN9Q=&sa=X&oi=image_result&resnum=4&ct=image&cd=1 Human Chromosome Basics C metacentric submetacentric C C Acrocentric From: http://www.miscarriage.com.au/images/pages/karyotype_normal.jpg • 22 pairs plus 2 sex chromosomes (diploid number: 46): (46, XX) • Composed of DNA plus infrastructure (histones, proteins, RNA, sugars) • 3 groups of shapes based on centromere position, arm length Example of G-Banding: Chromosome 11 • GTL stain: Giemsa/Trypsin/Leishman p arm • Chr 11 is submetacentric • RttiidRepresentative ideogram Centromere • Stained to distinguish denser and less dense areas • Unique staining patterns for each chromosome q arm • Many genes coded • Banding ≠ genes From: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cf/Chromosome_11.svg/164px-Chromosome_11.svg.png How Do You Define a Gene? • DNA sequence begins with a start codon; ends with a stop codon • Amino acids (each with a 3-character code) then join to form a protein which then has a function • There i s “fill er ” DNA that codes for other stuff So Many Genes… • ARHGAP20 109952.97611q23.2ARHGEF12 119713.15611q23.3ATM 107598.76911q22-q23BAD 63793.87811q13.1BIRC3 101693.40411q22C11orf30 75833.71711q13.5CARS 2978.73511p15.5CASP1 104401.44711q23CBL 118582.20011q23.3-qterCCND1 69165.05411q13CHKA 67576.90211q13.1DDB2 47193.06911p12-p11DDX10 108041.02611q22-q23EXT2 44073.67511p12-p11FANCF 22600.65511p15HRAS 522.24211p15.5KAT5 65236.06511q13LMO2 33836.69911p13MAML2 95351.08811q21MEN1 64327. 57011q13MIRN125B1 121475. 67511MLL 117812. 41511q23MRE11A 93790. 11511q21MYEOV parmp arm 68818.19811q13.2NUMA1 71391.55911q13NUP98 3689.63511p15PAK1 76710.70811q13-q14PICALM 85346.13311q14POU2AF1 110728.19011q23.1RELA 65178.39311q13RSF1 77054.92211q13.5SDHD 111462.83211q23SPA17 124048.95011q24.2SPI1 47332.98511p12-p11.22WT1 32365.90111p13ZBTB16 113436.49811q23 ACAT1 107497.46811q22.3ACP2 47217.42911p11.2ADAMTS15 129824.07911q25ADAMTS8 129780.02811q25ADM 10283.21811ADRBK1 66790.48111q13AHNAK 62039.95011q12-q13AIP 67007.09711q13.3ALDH3B2 67186.20911q13ALKBH3 43858.97311p11.2ALKBH8 106880.54411q22.3AMPD3 10428.80011p15ANKK1 112763.72311q23.2ANO1 69602.05611q13.2APBB1 6372.93111p15API5 43290.10911APLNR 56757.64311q12APOA1 116211.67911q23-q24ARAP1 Centromere 72073.76211q13.3ARCN1 117948.32111q23.3ARFIP2 6453.50211p15ARHGAP1 46655. 20811p11. 2ARHGEF17 72697. 31711q13. 3ARL2 64538. 16211q13ARRB1 74654. 13011q13ART1 3622.93711p15ASCL2 2246.30411p15.5B3GAT1 133753.60811q25B3GNT6 76423.08311q13.4BARX2 128751.09111q24.3BCL9L 118272.06111q23.3BDNF 27633.01811p14.1BIRC2 101723.17611q22BRMS1 65861.38011q13-q13.2BRSK2 1367.70511p15.5BTG4 110843.46611q23C11orf17 8889.27711p15.3C11orf68 65440.85911q13.1C1QTNF4 47567.79211q11C1QTNF5 118714.86211q23.3CADM1 114549.55511q23.2CALCA 14946.62411p15.2CAPN1 64705.91911q13CASP4 104318.80411q22.2- q22.3CASP5 104370.17211q22.2-q22.3CAT 34417.05411p13CCDC73 32580.20211p13CCKBR 6237.54211p15.4CD151 822.95211p15.5CD248 65838.53411q13CD3E 117680.50511q23CD44 35116.99311p13CD5 60626.50611q13CD59 33681.13211p13CD6 60495.69111q12.2CD81 2355.12311pter- p11.2CD82 44543.71711p11.2CDC42EP2 64838.90711q13CDK2AP2 67030.54411q13CDKN1C 2861. 02411p15. 5CDON 125331. 92311q23-q24CENTD2 72073. 76211q13. 3CEP57 95163. 29011q21CFL1 qarmq arm 65378.86111q13.1CHEK1 125000.24611q24.2CHORDC1 89574.26511q14.3CHRDL2 74085.12211CKAP5 46721.66011p11.2CLCF1 66888.21511q13.3CLP1 57181.20611q12CNTF 58146.72111q12CNTN5 98397.08111q21-q22.2COP1 104417.263-COX8A 63498.65511q12-q13CPT1A 68278.66411q13.2CREB3L1 46255.80411q11CRTAM 122214.46511q24.1CRY2 45825.24511p11.2CRYAB 111284.56011q22.3-q23.1CST6 65536.03811q13CTNND1 57285.81011q12.1CTSD 1730.56111p15.5CTSF 66087.51111q13.2CTTN 69922.26011q13CUL5 107384.61811q22.3CXCR5 118259.75111q23.3CYB5R2 7642.90211p15.4DCPS 125678.85711q24DDB1 60823.49511q12-q13DDX25 125279.48211q24DDX6 118123.68311q23.3DEAF1 634.22511p15.5DGKZ 46339.72111p11.2DKK3 11941.11911p15.3DLAT 111400.74811q23.1DNAJC4 63754.32911q13DPF2 64857.92211q13.1DPP3 66004.45611q12-q13.1DRD2 112785.52711q23DUSP8 15311531.857.85711p1511p15.5.5DYNC2H1 102485102485.370.37011q21-q22q22.1.1EED 8563385633.463.46311q1411q14.2.2-q22q22.3.3EHF 3459934599.244.24411p12EI24 124944.50811q23EIF3F 7965.44311p15.4EIF4G2 10775.16911p15ELF5 34456.91811p13-p12ESRRA 63829.62011q12ETS1 127833.87011q23.3F2 46697.31911p11-q12FADD 69726.91711q13.3FADS2 61352.28911q12.2FAM111B 58631.28611q12.1FAM89B 65096.39611q23FAT3 91724.91011q14.3FAU 64644.67811q13FBXL11 66644.07411q13.1FCHSD2 72225.43811q13.3FEN1 61316.72611q12FEZ1 124820.85811q24.2FGF19 69222.18711q13.1FGF3 69333.91711q13FGF4 69296.97811q13.3FLI1 128069.02311q24.1-q24.3FLRT1 63627.93811q12-q13FOLH1 49124.76311p11.2FOLR1 71578.60711q13.3- q14.1FOLR2 71605.46711q13.3-q14.1FOSL1 65416.26811q13FOXR1 118347.62711q23.3FRAG1 Dessen P, Knuutila S, Huret JL Chromosome 11. Atlas Genet Cytogenet 3786.36011p15.5FSHB 30209.13911p13FTH1 61488.33311q13FUT4 93916.77511q12-qterFXC1 Oncol Haematol. 2002. 6459.25311p15.2-q15.5FZD4 86334.36911q14-q21GAB2 77603.99011q14.1GAL 68208.55911q13.2GAS2 22652.93111p14.3GCRG224 82211.05611q13-q14GNG3 62231.70911p11GRM5 87880.62611q14.3GSTP1 URL : http://AtlasGeneticsOncology.org/Indexbychrom/idxa_11.html 67107.64211q13-qterGTF2H1 18300.71911p15.1-p14H19 1972.98311p15.5H2AFX 118469.79511q23.3HBB © Atlas of Genetics and Cytogenetics in Oncology and Haematology 5203.27211p15.5HCCA2 1447.26911p15.5HEPACAM 124294.35611q24.2HEPN1 124294.356-HIPK3 33235.74411p13HPS5 18256.79311p14HRASLS2 63076.81811q12.2HRASLS3 63098.52011q12.3HSPA8 122433.41011q24.1HSPB2 111288.70911q22-q23HTATIP2 20341.86511HTR3A 113351.12011q23.1- q23.2HYOU1 118420.10611q23.1-q23.3ICEBERG 104513.87911q21-q22IFITM1 303.99111p15.5IFITM3 309.67311p15.5IGF2 2106.92311p15.5IGF2AS 2118.31311p15.5IGHMBP2 68427.89511q13.3IL10RA 117362.31911q23IL18 111519.18611q22.2-q22.3ILK 1132.47411p15.5MUC5B 1200.87211p15.5MUC6 1002.82411p15.5MUS81 65384.44811q13MYOD1 17697.68611p15NAALAD2 89507.46611q14.3-q21NAP1L4 … What can go wrong with a gene? • The correct sequence is critical to coding the right protein/protein structure • If the chromosome carrying a particular gene is altered, then the resulting mutated protein or control elements may cause problems What can go wrong with a ch?hromosome? • Constitutional vs acquired abnormalities • Numerical abnormalities – Monosomy: loss of a whole chromosome – Trisomy: gain of a whole chromosome • Structural abnormalities – Deletions – Inversions – Translocations Monosomy X: Turner Syndrome CiilLConstitutional Loss Trisomy 21: Down Syndrome CCiilGionstitutional Gain Deletion http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/handbook/illustrations Deletion 5q AidLAcquired Loss • Interstitial losses of the long arm of chromosome 5 • These losses resu lt in large numbers of genes being lost • Often associated with myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia From: http://atlasgeneticsoncology.org/Educ/Images/GeneticCancerFig7.jpg Inversions http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/handbook/illustrations Inversion (3)(q24q27) AAidAblicquired Abnormality From: http://members.aol.com/chrominfo/images/inv3ideo.gif • Int erstiti al segmen t i nver ts Translocations http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/handbook/illustrations Translocation t(9;22) AidAbliAcquired Abnormality • Material is exchanged between chromosomes 9 and 22, creating a new fusion gene: bcr/abl • Breakpoint may vary a bit such that the newly created fusion protein may be of several lengths – p190 (kDa) From: http://members.aol.com/chrominfo/images/inv3ideo.gif – p210 http://atlasgeneticsoncology.org/Anomalies/CML.html Dicentric Chromosome http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/handbook/illustrations Isochromosomes http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/handbook/illustrations Ring Chromosomes http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/handbook/illustrations Duplication http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/handbook/illustrations Recap of Basic Abnormalities • Loss or gain of entire chromosomes – Monosomy –Trisomy • Structural – Deletions – IiInversions – Translocations • Plus more uncommon types of abnormalities – Derivative chromosome (der) • Used when only one chromosome of a translocation is present or • One chromosome has two or more structural abnormalities – Dicentric chromosome (dic) [chromosome has two centromeres] – Duplicate (dup) [duplication of a portion of a chromosome] – Insertion (ins) – Isochromosomes (i) [both arms are the same] – Marker chromosome (mar) [unidentifiable piece of chromosome] – Ring chromosome (r) – Hyperdiploidy: greater than 48 chromosomes Interpreting Cytogenetic Reporting •In sequence: – the overall number of chromosomes identified – sex chromosomes
Recommended publications
  • Monosomy X Turner Syndrome Information for Patients
    Monosomy X Turner syndrome Information for patients The healthcare professional responsible for your care has given you this leaflet because you have been identified by the Harmony® Prenatal Test as having a high probability of a chromosome disorder in your pregnancy. This fact sheet contains more information about the particular genetic disorder mentioned in your Harmony report. We recommend that you also discuss your result with an experienced doctor or genetic counsellor. Turner syndrome, or Monosomy X, is a sex chromosome disorder that occurs in females when there is only one copy of the X chromosome instead of the expected two (Figure 1). It occurs in at least one in every 2,500 female births. Monosomy X may be associated with an increased risk of miscarriage in the first or second trimester. More than half of those withT urner syndrome will be mosaic, meaning some of their cells have just one X chromosome and the other cells have two X chromosomes. Features and symptoms of Turner syndrome include subtle changes in physical appearance, short stature, infertility and learning difficulties, as well as some potential health conditions, including cardiac conditions, hypothyroidism, diabetes and autoimmune disease. Babies who are born with Turner syndrome could have a number of the features and symptoms of the syndrome, however, not everyone will have them all and severity will vary significantly. Mosaicism also plays a role in the varied severity of the syndrome. Although there is no cure for Turner syndrome, many of the associated symptoms can be treated. Girls with Turner syndrome may need regular health checks of their heart, kidneys and reproductive system throughout their lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Cytogenetics, Chromosomal Genetics
    Cytogenetics Chromosomal Genetics Sophie Dahoun Service de Génétique Médicale, HUG Geneva, Switzerland [email protected] Training Course in Sexual and Reproductive Health Research Geneva 2011 Cytogenetics is the branch of genetics that correlates the structure, number, and behaviour of chromosomes with heredity and diseases Conventional cytogenetics Molecular cytogenetics Molecular Biology I. Karyotype Definition Chromosomal Banding Resolution limits Nomenclature The metaphasic chromosome telomeres p arm q arm G-banded Human Karyotype Tjio & Levan 1956 Karyotype: The characterization of the chromosomal complement of an individual's cell, including number, form, and size of the chromosomes. A photomicrograph of chromosomes arranged according to a standard classification. A chromosome banding pattern is comprised of alternating light and dark stripes, or bands, that appear along its length after being stained with a dye. A unique banding pattern is used to identify each chromosome Chromosome banding techniques and staining Giemsa has become the most commonly used stain in cytogenetic analysis. Most G-banding techniques require pretreating the chromosomes with a proteolytic enzyme such as trypsin. G- banding preferentially stains the regions of DNA that are rich in adenine and thymine. R-banding involves pretreating cells with a hot salt solution that denatures DNA that is rich in adenine and thymine. The chromosomes are then stained with Giemsa. C-banding stains areas of heterochromatin, which are tightly packed and contain
    [Show full text]
  • Trisomy 21 with a Small Supernumerary Marker Chromosome Derived From
    BJMG 13 (1) (2010) 10.2478/v10034-010-0020-x SHORT COMMUNICATION TRISOMY 21 WITH A SMALL SUPERNUMERARY MARKER CHROMOSOME DERIVED FROM CHROMOSOMES 13/21 AND 18 Niksic SB1, Deretic VI2, Pilic GR1, Ewers E3, Merkas M3, Ziegler M3, Liehr T3,* *Corresponding Author: Thomas Liehr, Institut für Humangenetik, Postfach, D-07740 Jena, Germany; Tel.: +49-3641-935-533; Fax: +49-3641-935-582; E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT influenced by maternal age and affected fetuses are at an increased risk of miscarriage [1]. Different theories We describe a trisomy 21 with a small are discussed how free trisomy 21 develops during supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) maternal meiosis [2,3]. In 35 reported DS cases instead derived from chromosomes 13/21 and 18 in which of a karyotype 47,XN,+21 there was a karyotype the karyotype was 48,XY,+der(13 or 21)t(13 48,XN,+21,+mar, i.e., a small supernumerary or 21;18)(13 or 21pter→13q11 or 21q11.1::18p marker chromosome (sSMC) was also present [4]. 11.21→18pter),+21. Of the 35 case reports in the The sSMC are a morphologically heterogeneous literature for a karyotype 48,XN,+21,+mar, in group of structurally abnormal chromosomes only 12 was the origin of the sSMC determined by which may represent different types of inverted fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and only duplicated chromosomes, minute chromosomes one was a der(13 or 21) and none were derived and ring chromosomes. They can be characterized from two chromosomes. The influence of the partial unambiguously by molecular cytogenetics and are trisomy 18p on the clinical outcome was hard to usually equal in size or smaller than a chromosome determine, however, there are reports on clinically 20 in the same metaphase spread.
    [Show full text]
  • GENETICS and GENOMICS Ed
    GENETICS AND GENOMICS Ed. Csaba Szalai, PhD GENETICS AND GENOMICS Editor: Csaba Szalai, PhD, university professor Authors: Chapter 1: Valéria László Chapter 2, 3, 4, 6, 7: Sára Tóth Chapter 5: Erna Pap Chapter 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14: Csaba Szalai Chapter 15: András Falus and Ferenc Oberfrank Keywords: Mitosis, meiosis, mutations, cytogenetics, epigenetics, Mendelian inheritance, genetics of sex, developmental genetics, stem cell biology, oncogenetics, immunogenetics, human genomics, genomics of complex diseases, genomic methods, population genetics, evolution genetics, pharmacogenomics, nutrigenetics, gene environmental interaction, systems biology, bioethics. Summary The book contains the substance of the lectures and partly of the practices of the subject of ‘Genetics and Genomics’ held in Semmelweis University for medical, pharmacological and dental students. The book does not contain basic genetics and molecular biology, but rather topics from human genetics mainly from medical point of views. Some of the 15 chapters deal with medical genetics, but the chapters also introduce to the basic knowledge of cell division, cytogenetics, epigenetics, developmental genetics, stem cell biology, oncogenetics, immunogenetics, population genetics, evolution genetics, nutrigenetics, and to a relative new subject, the human genomics and its applications for the study of the genomic background of complex diseases, pharmacogenomics and for the investigation of the genome environmental interactions. As genomics belongs to sytems biology, a chapter introduces to basic terms of systems biology, and concentrating on diseases, some examples of the application and utilization of this scientific field are also be shown. The modern human genetics can also be associated with several ethical, social and legal issues. The last chapter of this book deals with these issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Epigenetic Control of Mammalian Centromere Protein Binding: Does DNA Methylation Have a Role?
    Journal of Cell Science 109, 2199-2206 (1996) 2199 Printed in Great Britain © The Company of Biologists Limited 1996 JCS3386 Epigenetic control of mammalian centromere protein binding: does DNA methylation have a role? Arthur R. Mitchell*, Peter Jeppesen, Linda Nicol†, Harris Morrison and David Kipling MRC Human Genetics Unit, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK *Author for correspondence (internet [email protected]) †Present address: MRC Reproductive Biology Unit, Edinburgh, UK SUMMARY Chromosome 1 of the inbred mouse strain DBA/2 has a block of minor satellite DNA sequences on chromosome 1. polymorphism associated with the minor satellite DNA at The binding of the CENP-E protein does not appear to be its centromere. The more terminal block of satellite DNA affected by demethylation of the minor satellite sequences. sequences on this chromosome acts as the centromere as We present a model to explain these observations. This shown by the binding of CREST ACA serum, anti-CENP- model may also indicate the mechanism by which the B and anti-CENP-E polyclonal sera. Demethylation of the CENP-B protein recognises specific sites within the arrays minor satellite DNA sequences accomplished by growing of minor satellite DNA on mouse chromosomes. cells in the presence of the drug 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine results in a redistribution of the CENP-B protein. This protein now binds to an enlarged area on the more terminal Key words: Centromere satellite DNA, Demethylation, Centromere block and in addition it now binds to the more internal antibody INTRODUCTION A common feature of many mammalian pericentromeric domains is that they contain families of repetitive DNA The centromere of mammalian chromosomes is recognised at sequences (Singer, 1982).
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosome 18
    Chromosome 18 Description Humans normally have 46 chromosomes in each cell, divided into 23 pairs. Two copies of chromosome 18, one copy inherited from each parent, form one of the pairs. Chromosome 18 spans about 78 million DNA building blocks (base pairs) and represents approximately 2.5 percent of the total DNA in cells. Identifying genes on each chromosome is an active area of genetic research. Because researchers use different approaches to predict the number of genes on each chromosome, the estimated number of genes varies. Chromosome 18 likely contains 200 to 300 genes that provide instructions for making proteins. These proteins perform a variety of different roles in the body. Health Conditions Related to Chromosomal Changes The following chromosomal conditions are associated with changes in the structure or number of copies of chromosome 18. Distal 18q deletion syndrome Distal 18q deletion syndrome occurs when a piece of the long (q) arm of chromosome 18 is missing. The term "distal" means that the missing piece (deletion) occurs near one end of the chromosome arm. The signs and symptoms of distal 18q deletion syndrome include delayed development and learning disabilities, short stature, weak muscle tone ( hypotonia), foot abnormalities, and a wide variety of other features. The deletion that causes distal 18q deletion syndrome can occur anywhere between a region called 18q21 and the end of the chromosome. The size of the deletion varies among affected individuals. The signs and symptoms of distal 18q deletion syndrome are thought to be related to the loss of multiple genes from this part of the long arm of chromosome 18.
    [Show full text]
  • Derived from Chromosome 22, a Case Report
    1802 Case Report Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism associated with another small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) derived from chromosome 22, a case report Abdullah1#, Cui Li2#, Minggang Zhao2, Xiang Wang2, Xu Li2, Junping Xing1 1Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China; 2Centre for Translational Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China #These authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence to: Junping Xing. Department of Urology, School of Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China. Email: [email protected]. Abstract: The idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (IHH) is portrayed as missing or fragmented pubescence, cryptorchidism, small penis, and infertility. Clinically it is characterized by the low level of sex steroids and gonadotropins, normal radiographic findings of the hypothalamic-pituitary areas, and normal baseline and reserve testing of the rest of the hypothalamic-pituitary axes. Delay puberty and infertility result from an abnormal pattern of episodic GnRH secretion. Mutation in a wide range of genes can clarify ~40% of the reasons for IHH, with the majority remaining hereditarily uncharacterized. New and innovative molecular tools enhance our understanding of the molecular controls underlying pubertal development. In this report, we aim to present a 26-year-old male of IHH associated with a small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) that originated from chromosome 22. The G-banding analysis revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+mar. High-throughput DNA sequencing identified an 8.54 Mb duplication of 22q11.1-q11.23 encompassing all the region of 22q11 duplication syndrome. Pedigree analysis showed that his mother has carried a balanced reciprocal translocation between Chromosomes 22 and X[t(X;22)].
    [Show full text]
  • Searching the Genomes of Inbred Mouse Strains for Incompatibilities That Reproductively Isolate Their Wild Relatives
    Journal of Heredity 2007:98(2):115–122 ª The American Genetic Association. 2007. All rights reserved. doi:10.1093/jhered/esl064 For permissions, please email: [email protected]. Advance Access publication January 5, 2007 Searching the Genomes of Inbred Mouse Strains for Incompatibilities That Reproductively Isolate Their Wild Relatives BRET A. PAYSEUR AND MICHAEL PLACE From the Laboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706. Address correspondence to the author at the address above, or e-mail: [email protected]. Abstract Identification of the genes that underlie reproductive isolation provides important insights into the process of speciation. According to the Dobzhansky–Muller model, these genes suffer disrupted interactions in hybrids due to independent di- vergence in separate populations. In hybrid populations, natural selection acts to remove the deleterious heterospecific com- binations that cause these functional disruptions. When selection is strong, this process can maintain multilocus associations, primarily between conspecific alleles, providing a signature that can be used to locate incompatibilities. We applied this logic to populations of house mice that were formed by hybridization involving two species that show partial reproductive isolation, Mus domesticus and Mus musculus. Using molecular markers likely to be informative about species ancestry, we scanned the genomes of 1) classical inbred strains and 2) recombinant inbred lines for pairs of loci that showed extreme linkage disequi- libria. By using the same set of markers, we identified a list of locus pairs that displayed similar patterns in both scans. These genomic regions may contain genes that contribute to reproductive isolation between M. domesticus and M.
    [Show full text]
  • Pedigrees and Karyotypes Pedigree
    Pedigrees and Karyotypes Pedigree A pedigree shows the relationships within a family and it helps to chart how one gene can be passed on from generation to generation. Pedigrees are tools used by genetic researchers or counselors to identify a genetic condition running through a family, they aid in making a diagnosis, and aid in determining who in the family is at risk for genetic conditions. On a pedigree: A circle represents a female A square represents a male A horizontal line connecting a male and female represents a marriage A vertical line and a bracket connect the parents to their children A circle/square that is shaded means the person HAS the trait. A circle/square that is not shaded means the person does not have the trait. Children are placed from oldest to youngest. A key is given to explain what the trait is. Marriage Male-DAD Female-MOM Has the trait Male-Son Female-daughter Female-daughter Male- Son Oldest to youngest Steps: ff Ff •Identify all people who have the trait. •For the purpose of this class all traits will be given to you. In other instances, you would have to determine whether or not the trait is autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, or sex- linked. •In this example, all those who have the trait are homozygous recessive. •Can you correctly identify all genotypes of this family? ff ff Ff Ff •F- Normal •f- cystic fibrosis Key: affected male affected female unaffected male unaffected female Pp Pp PKU P- Unaffected p- phenylketonuria PP or Pp pp Pp pp pp Pp Pp Key: affected male affected female unaffected male unaffected female H-huntington’s hh Hh disease h-Unaffected Hh hh Hh hh Hh hh hh Key: affected male affected female unaffected male unaffected female Sex-Linked Inheritance Colorblindness Cy cc cy Cc Cc cy cy Key: affected male affected female unaffected male unaffected female Karyotypes To analyze chromosomes, cell biologists photograph cells in mitosis, when the chromosomes are fully condensed and easy to see (usually in metaphase).
    [Show full text]
  • Epigenetics in Clinical Practice: the Examples of Azacitidine and Decitabine in Myelodysplasia and Acute Myeloid Leukemia
    Leukemia (2013) 27, 1803–1812 & 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0887-6924/13 www.nature.com/leu SPOTLIGHT REVIEW Epigenetics in clinical practice: the examples of azacitidine and decitabine in myelodysplasia and acute myeloid leukemia EH Estey Randomized trials have clearly demonstrated that the hypomethylating agents azacitidine and decitabine are more effective than ‘best supportive care’(BSC) in reducing transfusion frequency in ‘low-risk’ myelodysplasia (MDS) and in prolonging survival compared with BSC or low-dose ara-C in ‘high-risk’ MDS or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with 21–30% blasts. They also appear equivalent to conventional induction chemotherapy in AML with 420% blasts and as conditioning regimens before allogeneic transplant (hematopoietic cell transplant, HCT) in MDS. Although azacitidine or decitabine are thus the standard to which newer therapies should be compared, here we discuss whether the improvement they afford in overall survival is sufficient to warrant a designation as a standard in treating individual patients. We also discuss pre- and post-treatment covariates, including assays of methylation to predict response, different schedules of administration, combinations with other active agents and use in settings other than active disease, in particular post HCT. We note that rational development of this class of drugs awaits delineation of how much of their undoubted effect in fact results from hypomethylation and reactivation of gene expression. Leukemia (2013) 27, 1803–1812; doi:10.1038/leu.2013.173
    [Show full text]
  • An Automated Pipeline for Inferring Variant-Driven Gene
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN MAGPEL: an autoMated pipeline for inferring vAriant‑driven Gene PanEls from the full‑length biomedical literature Nafseh Saberian1, Adib Shaf 1, Azam Peyvandipour1 & Sorin Draghici 1,2* In spite of the eforts in developing and maintaining accurate variant databases, a large number of disease‑associated variants are still hidden in the biomedical literature. Curation of the biomedical literature in an efort to extract this information is a challenging task due to: (i) the complexity of natural language processing, (ii) inconsistent use of standard recommendations for variant description, and (iii) the lack of clarity and consistency in describing the variant-genotype-phenotype associations in the biomedical literature. In this article, we employ text mining and word cloud analysis techniques to address these challenges. The proposed framework extracts the variant- gene‑disease associations from the full‑length biomedical literature and designs an evidence‑based variant-driven gene panel for a given condition. We validate the identifed genes by showing their diagnostic abilities to predict the patients’ clinical outcome on several independent validation cohorts. As representative examples, we present our results for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), breast cancer and prostate cancer. We compare these panels with other variant‑driven gene panels obtained from Clinvar, Mastermind and others from literature, as well as with a panel identifed with a classical diferentially expressed genes (DEGs) approach. The results show that the panels obtained by the proposed framework yield better results than the other gene panels currently available in the literature. One crucial step in understanding the biological mechanism underlying a disease condition is to capture the relationship between the variants and the disease risk1.
    [Show full text]
  • Barbara Mcclintock
    Barbara McClintock Lee B. Kass and Paul Chomet Abstract Barbara McClintock, pioneering plant geneticist and winner of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1983, is best known for her discovery of transposable genetic elements in corn. This chapter provides an overview of many of her key findings, some of which have been outlined and described elsewhere. We also provide a new look at McClintock’s early contributions, based on our readings of her primary publications and documents found in archives. We expect the reader will gain insight and appreciation for Barbara McClintock’s unique perspective, elegant experiments and unprecedented scientific achievements. 1 Introduction This chapter is focused on the scientific contributions of Barbara McClintock, pioneering plant geneticist and winner of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1983 for her discovery of transposable genetic elements in corn. Her enlightening experiments and discoveries have been outlined and described in a number of papers and books, so it is not the aim of this report to detail each step in her scientific career and personal life but rather highlight many of her key findings, then refer the reader to the original reports and more detailed reviews. We hope the reader will gain insight and appreciation for Barbara McClintock’s unique perspective, elegant experiments and unprecedented scientific achievements. Barbara McClintock (1902–1992) was born in Hartford Connecticut and raised in Brooklyn, New York (Keller 1983). She received her undergraduate and graduate education at the New York State College of Agriculture at Cornell University. In 1923, McClintock was awarded the B.S.
    [Show full text]