Land Use and Ft Lewis.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Land Use and Ft Lewis.Pdf Van Perdue The Nature Conservancy of Washington 217 Pine Street, Suite 1100 Seattle, Washington 98101 Land-Use and the Fort Lewis Prairies Van Perdue Abstract Human land use is at once responsible for the very existence of the western Washington prairies of the Puget trough and for their extensive degradation. Lessons learned from studying the results of various land uses may point the way to recovery of the prairies to something approximating their pre-1800 condition. Native American land use is likely responsible for existence of the prairies and for much of their character. Their manipulation of the land included frequent use of fire, along with various techniques for cultivating native plants. Their use of fire retarded the advance of conifers onto the open plains. Agricultural techniques may have been responsible for some of the distribution of native plants and perhaps even for introduction from the interior of food plants now thought to be native. Later arrivals have used the land in a greater variety of ways, many of which have been destructive of traditional prairie characteristics. Among the most destructive have been the suppression of fire and the introduction, both intentional and accidental, of plants which have out-competed native prairie vegetation. Other destructive uses include accelerating development, introduction of livestock and allowing it to overgraze, draining of former wetlands, and various military training activities. Establishment of Fort Lewis in 1916 likely retarded the destruction by ending development on the prairies. Various mission changes have had varying impacts on the prairies, but the overall result is easy to see in many places, where subdivisions have begun to arise outside installation boundaries, and where continued heavy grazing has caused displacement of native grasses. Fort Lewis authorities have in recent years begun to reintroduce the use of fire in the prairies as means of controlling Scotch broom. Some incidental consequences may include the retardation of conifer invasion and suppression of other invasives that are not adapted to cyclic burning. Introduction survey the changing character of human There is much conjecture about the land use and its effects on the shape of origin of the prairies of the Puget trough. the prairies remaining at Fort Lewis. Even so, there can be little objection to the notion that human use of the prairie The Nisquallies land has caused the prairies to endure The present-day Nisqually Indians and to take the shape that characterizes represent part of the legacy of Native them today. This paper attempts to Americans known to have populated the Nisqually delta long before the white V. Perdue Land-use of Fort Lewis 17 settlers arrived. Derived from a much this loveliness. Evergreen cones are all greater group known as the Salish about, whose lower branches caress people, they comprise but one of a large buttercup, larkspur, violet, strawberry number of tribes descended from the blossom, and other sweet flowers amid Salish. By the 13th century A.D., the grasses at their feet and whose tops evidence suggests the Salish were firmly are already reaching to the shoulders of in control of an area that had been their progenitors.”2 dominated by the earlier Marpole Lyrical though it is, this piece assumes culture. Before arrival of the whites, the beauty they beheld was the Nisqually villages existed at several handiwork of God unassisted by places on and near Fort Lewis.1 humans. Modern-day residents of the area have Careful thought and an examination of come to think of the Salish as living off various records indicate this view is the “spontaneous product of nature” flawed. The most obvious example is the until the white settlers came. In popular invasion of the prairies by conifer lore the Indians moved easily across the forests. Since suppression of fire land leaving it as their forbears had became national policy, evergreen found it. This presumes the landscape forests have taken over thousands of was left entirely to natural processes acres of western Washington prairie. until whites began to shape it to their One could infer that without human needs. intervention, nature would have replaced Such an attitude reveals itself in writings the prairies with forests thousands of published early in this century. Early years ago. newspaperman and historian Clarence There is another way to determine Bagley wrote, “Lying in the northern whether indigenous peoples manipulated angle formed by the Nisqually river and the environment before the Europeans the Sound is one of the world’s beauty arrived. The food cycle for the spots. No grand park of human creation Nisquallies, and indeed for many of the rivals its charm of undulating plain; its Salish groups, was one in which they silvery lakes with pebbly beaches, depended primarily upon the fruits of nestling among detached or winding Puget Sound and its associated streams groves whose vivid green of oak, maple, 3 and rivers. They spent winters along the alder and dogwood brightens the somber shores where salmon and shellfish were hues of the prevailing evergreens. The there for the taking and the water mass old gray oaks, with silver-threaded moderated temperatures. During the mosses pendant from every gnarled spring and summer they moved to limb, are almost coeval with the snow- established village areas on the prairies capped mountains off toward sunrise. to gather the resources available there.4 Here and there big pines and firs, parents of the younger brood that crowd each other for breath of air and ray of 2 Meeker, Ezra. Pioneer Reminiscences of Puget sunshine, stand sentinel guard over all Sound. 3 Haeberlin and Gunther. ibid. 4 ibid. See also Eells, Myron. The Indians of 1 Haeberlin, Herman Karl, and Gunther,Erna. Puget Sound: the Notebooks of Myron Eells, The Indians of Puget Sound. edited by George Pierre Castile. V. Perdue Land-use of Fort Lewis 18 The food resources of the prairies were or otherwise disturbed land. Once largely dependent upon deliberate established, the dense rhizome network burning. Fire benefits prairie forbs in allows the colony to easily survive the several ways. One of the primary burning of the tops after they have died benefits is that fire eliminates back in the fall. Thus, when fire competition. By removing seasonally removes the dead bracken tops and dead vegetation, fire increases the competing plant species, the bracken likelihood that the radicles of spreads into ever larger areas. Fire may germinating seed will reach mineral soil. even trigger rhizome growth. Since the Moreover, burning releases nutrients. Salish valued bracken as a food source it is likely they set fire to the dead tops to Settlers and early surveyors found three increase its area. particular plants in abundance in areas inhabited by the Nisquallies and other Fire benefits camas in less direct ways. Salish people. Bracken fern (Pteridium Its top growth, too, dies off in late aquilinum L.), and camas lilies summer, and burning does not damage (Camassia quamash L.) existed on the its deeply buried bulbs. On the other prairies, and nettles (Urtica dioica ssp. hand, because it is a bulb plant, burning Gracilis var. Lyalli (Wats.) Hitchc.) does not encourage its spread, it merely thrived in riparian areas that ran through reduces competition. It takes direct the prairies. All three of these were human intervention to expand the plant’s crucial to Salish culture. range. (Who is to say the Salish or even the Marpole did not introduce the camas University of Washington historian to the Puget trough?) The very act of Richard White says the best evidence for harvesting probably helped the prairie burning was the abundance of accidental spread of camas when natives bracken and camas, which dominated 5 accidentally split, dropped or discarded large areas. Both were so plentiful that bulbs. White argues that the Salish they were staples of the Indian diet. would soon discover this and add Natives ground bracken rhizomes into cultivation to their repertoire of flour that they used for bread, and they agricultural practices. Indian testimony ate the camas bulb fresh, dried, or verifies some cultivation was followed.7 preserved. This abundance was not For instance, they dug in plant refuse likely the product of chance but of the around tiger lilies and wild carrot. result of burning. Indeed, records maintained by Hudson’s Bay Company After the potato reached the Puget document prairie fires almost every year Sound region, Salish tribes adopted its in late summer and early autumn.6 cultivation with no particular help from the whites.8 Bracken here, as throughout much of its They correctly assumed that range, is a major pioneer of burned-over soils rich enough to support a vigorous growth of nettles would be good for growing potatoes. Wherever there is 5 White, Richard. Land Use, Environment, and Social Change: The Shaping of Island County, human settlement over extended periods Washington. of time, decomposing waste enriches 6 Journals of Occurrences at Muck Station and Tlithlow Station. Journals maintained by clerks employed by the Pugets Sound Agricultural 7 White. Ibid. Company. 8 ibid. V. Perdue Land-use of Fort Lewis 19 the local soils. Plant refuse, human and opening up the forest edge so hunters animal excrement, ashes from fires, and could see game over greater distances.13 shells and bones provide the surrounding Burning did open up the floor for new soils with significant amounts of understory growth on which deer nitrogen, phosphorous, and potash. browsed, but this was probably a side Over time these inhabited areas develop effect. soils much richer in plant nutrients than (While the Indians modified vegetation surrounding soils, and it is in just such patterns on the prairies, they clearly did locations that the early settlers and not stop their activities at the prairie surveyors found huge populations of edge.
Recommended publications
  • DOCUMENTS Journal of Occurrences at Nisqually House, 1833
    DOCUMENTS Journal of Occurrences at Nisqually House, 1833 INTRODUCTION F art Nisqually was the first permanent settlement of white men on Puget Sound. Fort Vancouver had been headquarters since 1825 and Fort Langley was founded near the mouth of the Fraser river in 1827. Fort N isqually was, therefore, a station which served to link these two together. While the primary object of the Hudson's Bay Company was to collect furs, nevertheless, the great needs of their own trappers, and the needs of Russian America (Alaska), and the Hawaiian Islands and other places for foodstuffs, caused that Company to seriously think of entering into an agricultural form of enterprise. But certain of the directors were not in favor of having the Company branch out into other lines, so a subsidiary company, the Puget Sound Agricultural Company, was formed in 1838 for the purpose of taking advantage of the agri­ cultural opportunities of the Pacific. This company was financed and officered by members of the Hudson's Bay Company. From that time Fort Nisqually became more an agricultural enterprise than a fur-trad­ ing post. The Treaty of 1846, by which the United States received the sovereignty of the country to the south of the forty-ninth parallel of north latitude, promised the Hudson's Bay Company and the Puget Sound Agricultural Company that their possessions in that section would be respected. The antagonism of incoming settlers who coveted the fine lands aggravated the situation. Dr. William Fraser T olmie, as Super­ intendent of the Puget Sound Agricultural Company, remained in charge until 1859, when he removed to Victoria, and Edward Huggins, a clerk, was left as custodian at Nisqually.
    [Show full text]
  • Battlefields & Treaties
    welcome to Indian Country Take a moment, and look up from where you are right now. If you are gazing across the waters of Puget Sound, realize that Indian peoples thrived all along her shoreline in intimate balance with the natural world, long before Europeans arrived here. If Mount Rainier stands in your view, realize that Indian peoples named it “Tahoma,” long before it was “discovered” by white explorers. Every mountain that you see on the horizon, every stand of forest, every lake and river, every desert vista in eastern Washington, all of these beautiful places are part of our Indian heritage, and carry the songs of our ancestors in the wind. As we have always known, all of Washington State is Indian Country. To get a sense of our connection to these lands, you need only to look at a map of Washington. Over 75 rivers, 13 counties, and hundreds of cities and towns all bear traditional Indian names – Seattle, Tacoma, Yakima, and Spokane among them. Indian peoples guided Lewis and Clark to the Pacifi c, and pointed them safely back to the east. Indian trails became Washington’s earliest roads. Wild salmon, delicately grilled and smoked in Alderwood, has become the hallmark of Washington State cuisine. Come visit our lands, and come learn about our cultures and our peoples. Our families continue to be intimately woven into the world around us. As Tribes, we will always fi ght for preservation of our natural resources. As Tribes, we will always hold our elders and our ancestors in respect. As Tribes, we will always protect our treaty rights and sovereignty, because these are rights preserved, at great sacrifi ce, ABOUT ATNI/EDC by our ancestors.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropological Study of Yakama Tribe
    1 Anthropological Study of Yakama Tribe: Traditional Resource Harvest Sites West of the Crest of the Cascades Mountains in Washington State and below the Cascades of the Columbia River Eugene Hunn Department of Anthropology Box 353100 University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195-3100 [email protected] for State of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife WDFW contract # 38030449 preliminary draft October 11, 2003 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements 4 Executive Summary 5 Map 1 5f 1. Goals and scope of this report 6 2. Defining the relevant Indian groups 7 2.1. How Sahaptin names for Indian groups are formed 7 2.2. The Yakama Nation 8 Table 1: Yakama signatory tribes and bands 8 Table 2: Yakama headmen and chiefs 8-9 2.3. Who are the ―Klickitat‖? 10 2.4. Who are the ―Cascade Indians‖? 11 2.5. Who are the ―Cowlitz‖/Taitnapam? 11 2.6. The Plateau/Northwest Coast cultural divide: Treaty lines versus cultural 12 divides 2.6.1. The Handbook of North American Indians: Northwest Coast versus 13 Plateau 2.7. Conclusions 14 3. Historical questions 15 3.1. A brief summary of early Euroamerican influences in the region 15 3.2. How did Sahaptin-speakers end up west of the Cascade crest? 17 Map 2 18f 3.3. James Teit‘s hypothesis 18 3.4. Melville Jacobs‘s counter argument 19 4. The Taitnapam 21 4.1. Taitnapam sources 21 4.2. Taitnapam affiliations 22 4.3. Taitnapam territory 23 4.3.1. Jim Yoke and Lewy Costima on Taitnapam territory 24 4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Nisqually Transmission Line Relocation Project
    Nisqually Transmission Line Relocation Project Preliminary Environmental Assessment Bonneville Power Administration Fort Lewis Military Reservation Nisqually Indian Tribe Bureau of Indian Affairs October 2004 Nisqually Transmission Line Relocation Project Responsible Agencies and Tribe: U.S. Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration (Bonneville); U.S. Department of Defense, Fort Lewis Military Reservation (Fort Lewis); the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA); and the Nisqually Indian Tribe (Tribe). Name of Proposed Project: Nisqually Transmission Line Relocation Project Abstract: Bonneville proposes to remove and reroute two parallel transmission lines that cross the Nisqually Indian Reservation in Thurston County, Washington. Bonneville’s easement across the Reservation for a portion of the Olympia-Grand Coulee line has expired. Though Bonneville has a perpetual easement for the Olympia-South Tacoma line across the Reservation, the Tribe has asked Bonneville to remove both lines so the Tribe can eventually develop the land for its community. The land fronts State Route 510 and is across the highway from the Tribe’s Red Wind Casino. In addition, the Tribe would like Bonneville to remove the two lines from a parcel next to the Reservation that Fort Lewis owns. The Tribe is working with Fort Lewis to obtain this parcel, which also has frontage on SR 510. Bonneville is proposing to remove the portions of these lines on the Reservation and on the Fort-owned parcel and rebuild them south of SR 510 on Fort Lewis property. Fort Lewis is willing to have these lines on their federal property, in exchange for other in-holdings currently owned by Thurston County that the Tribe would purchase and turn over to Fort Lewis.
    [Show full text]
  • Nisqually Land Trust Land Trust Acquires Rare Nisqually River
    Winter 2016 NISQUALLY LAND TRUST Newsletter Land Trust Acquires Rare Nisqually River Salmon Property Has Potential for Extending Yelm-Tenino Trail to River he Land Trust continued its renewed push to protect “It was well over ten years ago that we first identified this Thigh-priority salmon habitat on the main stem of the valuable shoreline property as important for protection,” Nisqually River by acquiring a prized shoreline property in said Lands Committee Chair George Walter. “Over the the river’s Whitewater Reach, just below Yelm. years we have kept in contact with the owner, and we’re very happy to announce that we have now acquired the The ten-acre property includes over 2,000 feet of salmon- property for permanent protection. Securing this much producing shoreline, an exceptional run of habitat to find high-quality habitat in such a relatively developed area is a in a single property. The Whitewater Reach is rated highest rare opportunity.” priority for protection in both the Nisqually Chinook Salmon Recovery Plan and the Nisqually Steelhead (continued on page 7) Recovery Plan. The Land Trust has acquired a key property with 2,000 feet of Nisqually River salmon shoreline (right bank, above) and potential for extending the Yelm-Tenino Trail. Land Trust Acquires Ohop Creek Spawning Property - Page 5 President’s Letter ummertime, and the livin’ is…wait, it’s OUR MISSION Sautumn already! How’d that happen? The Nisqually Land Trust acquires and We had another great summer here in the manages critical lands to permanently Northwest. Maybe just a little too warm for benefit the water, wildlife, and people of a couple of days there, but not so warm that the Nisqually River Watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Chambers Creek
    Section 3 - Physical and Environmental Inventory 3.1 Chambers Creek – Clover Creek Drainage Basin 3.2 Puyallup River Drainage Basin 3.3 Sewer Service Basins in the Puyallup and White River Drainage Basins 3.4 Nisqually River Drainage Basin 3.5 Kitsap Drainage Basin 3.6 City of Tacoma - North End WWTP 3.7 Joint Base Lewis Mcchord Sewer System – Tatsolo Point WWTP Pierce County Public Works and Utilities – Sewer Utility Unified Sewer Plan Update Section 3 Section 3 – Physical and Environmental Inventory Section 3 documents the land-use and environmental tenants of the four major basins in Pierce County and are organized around those basins. Chambers Creek – Clover Creek Drainage Basin - Section 3.1 Puyallup River Drainage Basin – Section 3.2 Nisqually River Drainage Basin – Section 3.4 Kitsap Drainage Basin – Section 3.5 3.1 Chambers Creek – Clover Creek Drainage Basin The Chambers Creek - Clover Creek Drainage Basin (Basin) is located in central Pierce County, between Puget Sound on the west and the ridge above the Puyallup River Valley on the east. Point Defiance and the southwest shore of Commencement Bay serve as the basin’s northern boundary, and the City of DuPont lies on the southern boundary. The basin encompasses approximately 104,258 acres (117 square miles) of land including the Cities of DuPont, including Northwest Landing, University Place, Lakewood, and Northwest Tacoma, Fircrest, the Towns of Ruston, and Steilacoom, as well as portions of Fort Lewis and McChord Military Reservations, and the unincorporated communities of South Hill, Frederickson, Mid County, Graham, Parkland, and Spanaway. 3.1.1 Topography Lowland topography is generally flat to gently rolling.
    [Show full text]
  • Sequalitchew Creek Restoration Plan
    RESTORATION PLAN Sequalitchew Creek Watershed Prepared for: Environmental Caucus and CalPortland Project No. 040001 March 8, 2018 RESTORATION PLAN Sequalitchew Creek Watershed Prepared for: Environmental Caucus and CalPortland Project No. 040001 March 8, 2018 Contents Introduction .........................................................................................................1 Goals and Objectives ..........................................................................................3 Restoration Plan Elements .................................................................................6 1. Regulatory Actions ......................................................................................... 8 2. Flow Restoration ............................................................................................ 8 3. Flow Maintenance and Enhancement ......................................................... 10 4. Habitat Restoration ...................................................................................... 11 Governance ........................................................................................................ 13 Committee ........................................................................................................ 13 Meetings ........................................................................................................... 13 Scope of Authority ........................................................................................... 13 Information Sharing ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pierce County Biodiversity Network Assessment August 2004
    Pierce County Biodiversity Network Assessment August 2004 Pierce County Biodiversity Network Assessment – August 2004 Acknowledgements Pierce County Planning and Land Services Department-Advance Planning Division Katherine Brooks, Senior Planner Karen Trueman, GIS Specialist Chip Vincent, Principal Planner Pierce County Executive’s Office Debby Hyde, Special Projects Coordinator Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife John Jacobson, Senior GIS Analyst, Habitat Program Marc McCalmon, Landscape Conservation Analyst, Habitat Program Erik Neatherlin, Landscape Conservation Planner, Habitat Program Michelle Tirhi, Urban Biologist-South Puget Sound Region University of Washington, Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Unit Karen Dvornich, Public Education and Outreach Coordinator, NatureMapping Program and Washington GAP Analysis Project Assistant Chris Grue, Principal Investigator and Leader, WACFWRU Metro Parks Tacoma John Garner, Education Coordinator Tahoma Audubon Society Bryan Flint, Conservation Coordinator Puyallup River Watershed Council Dave Seabrook TerraLogic GIS Chris Hansen, Principal Levon Yengoyan, Principal Authors Katherine Brooks, Pierce County Planning and Land Services Karen Dvornich, University of Washington Michelle Tirhi, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Erik Neatherlin, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Marc McCalmon, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife John Jacobson, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Reference Citation Brooks, K., K.M. Dvornich, M. Tirhi, E. Neatherlin, M. McCalmon, and
    [Show full text]
  • Nisqually State Park Interpretive Plan
    NISQUALLY STATE PARK INTERPRETIVE PLAN OCTOBER 2020 Prepared for the Nisqually Indian Tribe by Historical Research Associates, Inc. We acknowledge that Nisqually State Park is part of the homelands of the Squalli-absch (sqʷaliʔabš) people. We offer respect for their history and culture, and for the path they show in caring for this place. “All natural things are our brothers and sisters, they have things to teach us, if we are aware and listen.” —Willie Frank, Sr. Nisqually State Park forest. Credit: HRA TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . 5 PART 1: FOUNDATION. .11 Purpose and Guiding Principles . .12 Interpretive Goals . 12 Desired Outcomes . .13 Themes. 14 Setting and Connections to Regional Interpretive Sites . 16 Issues and Influences Affecting Interpretation . .18 PART 2: RECOMMENDATIONS . .21 Introduction . 22 Recommended Approach . .22 Recommended Actions and Benchmarks . 26 Interpretive Media Recommendations . 31 Fixed Media Interpretation . .31 Digital Interpretation . 31 Personal Services . 32 Summary . 33 PLANNING RESOURCES . 34 HRA Project Team . 35 Interpretive Planning Advisory Group and Planning Meeting Participants . .35 Acknowledgements . 35 Definitions . 35 Select Interpretation Resources. 36 Select Management Documents . 36 Select Topical Resources. 36 APPENDICES Appendix A: Interpretive Theme Matrix Appendix B: Recommended Implementation Plan Appendix C: Visitor Experience Mapping INTRODUCTION Nisqually State Park welcome sign includes Nisqually design elements and Lushootseed language translation. Credit: HRA Nisqually State Park | Interpretive Plan | October 2020 5 The Nisqually River is a defining feature of Nisqually State Park. According to the late Nisqually historian Cecelia Svinth Carpenter, “The Nisqually River became the thread woven through the heart and fabric of the Nisqually Indian people.” —Carpenter, The Nisqually People, My People.
    [Show full text]
  • Dupont Heritage Plan
    1 DuPont Heritage Plan Presented to the City of DuPont By the DuPont Historical Society 2014 “In a nutshell, planning is the process of figuring out where you want to go, evaluating where you are now, and identifying how you can reach your destination……. Susan L. Henry Renaud, Preservation Planning, National Park Service 2 Introduction Historic places are important to every community. In an age of change, they help provide a sense of needed continuity. Indeed, they greatly contribute to a sense of place which can unite residents. Also historic places, when properly presented, can attract tourists to a town. This would naturally benefit the local economy. The City of DuPont is blessed with many significant historic places. They include both buildings and sites. Together these places tell the amazing story of the DuPont area. This story began with the Nisqually Indian occupation of the land. It continued with the Euro-American explorers of the late 18th and early 19th Centuries. Then the British owned Hudson’s Bay Company in the 19th Century established a sequential series of trading posts called Fort Nisqually that changed life forever in the Southern Puget Sound region. Encounters with Native Americans, Missionaries, and American Settlers brought cooperation and conflict. The Medicine Creek Treaty and Puget Sound Indian War shifted the power to the Americans and their homesteads. Change came again in the early 20th Century when the DuPont Company bought land and set up an explosives factory. The Company employees and their families were first housed in temporary tar paper shacks, but soon the historic village of DuPont took shape.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Nisqually Markers for His History of Washington, Idaho and Montana
    Fort Nisqually Markers 239 three thousand pages of manuscript. In Bancroft's bibliography for his History of Washington, Idaho and Montana is found "Morse, (Eldridge) Notes of Hist. and Res, of Wash. Territory 24 vols. ms." Mr. Morse also wrote reams of Indian legends which have disappeared from "the keeping of the last known custodian. His newspaper venture exhausted his savings and during the last years of his life he maintained himself by selling the products from his loved gardens near Snohomish. His son Ed. C. Morse is a mining engineer well known in Alaska and other parts of the Pacific Northwest. Fort Nisqually Markers On June 9, 1928, appropriate ceremonies commemorated the placing of markers at Fort Nisqually, first home of white men on the shores of Puget Sound. The settlement by the Hudson's Bay Company was begun there on May 30, 1833. The property now belongs to E. 1. Du Pont de Nemours & Company which corporation has sought to save and to mark the old buildings. The Washington State Historical Society, deeming this act worthy of public recognition, prepared a program of dedication. The presiding officer was President C. L. Babcock of the Washington State Historical Society. Music was furnished by the Fort Lewis Military Band. The address of welcome was given by Manager F. T. Beers of the Du Pont Powder works and at the request of President Babcock the response to that address was made by State Senator Walter S. Davis. W. P. Bonney, Secretary of the Washington State Historical Society, read from the old Hudson's Bay Company records the first day's entry in the daily journal of Fort Nisqually.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpretation and Conclusions
    "LIKE NUGGETS FROM A GOLD MINEu SEARCHING FOR BRICKS AND THEIR MAKERS IN 'THE OREGON COUNTRY' B~f' Kmtm (1 COfwer~ ;\ th¢...i, ...uhmineJ Ilt SOIl(mla Slale UFU vcr,il y 11'1 partial fulfiUlT'Ietlt of the fCqlJln:mcntfi for the dcgr~ of MASTER OF ARTS tn Copyright 2011 by Kristin O. Converse ii AUTHORlZAnON FOR REPRODUCnON OF MASTER'S THESISIPROJECT 1pM' pernlt"j(m I~ n:pnll.lm.:til.m of Ihi$ rhais in ib endrel)" \Ii' !tbout runt\er uuthorilAtlOO fn.)m me. on the condiHt)Jllhat the per",)f1 Of a,eocy rl;!'(lucMing reproduction the "'OS$. and 1:Jf't)vi~ proper ackruJwkd,rnem nf auth.:If'l'htp. III “LIKE NUGGETS FROM A GOLD MINE” SEARCHING FOR BRICKS AND THEIR MAKERS IN „THE OREGON COUNTRY‟ Thesis by Kristin O. Converse ABSTRACT Purpose of the Study: The history of the Pacific Northwest has favored large, extractive and national industries such as the fur trade, mining, lumbering, fishing and farming over smaller pioneer enterprises. This multi-disciplinary study attempts to address that oversight by focusing on the early brickmakers in „the Oregon Country‟. Using a combination of archaeometry and historical research, this study attempts to make use of a humble and under- appreciated artifact – brick – to flesh out the forgotten details of the emergence of the brick industry, its role in the shifting local economy, as well as its producers and their economic strategies. Procedure: Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis was performed on 89 red, common bricks archaeologically recovered from Fort Vancouver and 113 comparative samples in an attempt to „source‟ the brick.
    [Show full text]