DOCSLIB.ORG

Pierce County Biodiversity Network Assessment August 2004

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pierce County Biodiversity Network Assessment August 2004 Pierce County Biodiversity Network Assessment August 2004 Pierce County Biodiversity Network Assessment – August 2004 Acknowledgements Pierce County Planning and Land Services Department-Advance Planning Division Katherine Brooks, Senior Planner Karen Trueman, GIS Specialist Chip Vincent, Principal Planner Pierce County Executive’s Office Debby Hyde, Special Projects Coordinator Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife John Jacobson, Senior GIS Analyst, Habitat Program Marc McCalmon, Landscape Conservation Analyst, Habitat Program Erik Neatherlin, Landscape Conservation Planner, Habitat Program Michelle Tirhi, Urban Biologist-South Puget Sound Region University of Washington, Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Unit Karen Dvornich, Public Education and Outreach Coordinator, NatureMapping Program and Washington GAP Analysis Project Assistant Chris Grue, Principal Investigator and Leader, WACFWRU Metro Parks Tacoma John Garner, Education Coordinator Tahoma Audubon Society Bryan Flint, Conservation Coordinator Puyallup River Watershed Council Dave Seabrook TerraLogic GIS Chris Hansen, Principal Levon Yengoyan, Principal Authors Katherine Brooks, Pierce County Planning and Land Services Karen Dvornich, University of Washington Michelle Tirhi, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Erik Neatherlin, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Marc McCalmon, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife John Jacobson, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Reference Citation Brooks, K., K.M. Dvornich, M. Tirhi, E. Neatherlin, M. McCalmon, and J. Jacobson. 2004. Pierce County Biodiversity Network Assessment: August, 2004. Report to Pierce County Council, Pierce County, 146 pp. 2 Pierce County Biodiversity Network Assessment – August 2004 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................. 6 Project Description.......................................................................................................................... 6 Findings........................................................................................................................................... 6 Purpose............................................................................................................................................ 6 Stakeholders .................................................................................................................................... 6 Implementation ............................................................................................................................... 7 Background................................................................................................................................................ 8 Overview of the Biodiversity Network...........................................................................................8 Geographic Information System (GIS) Review.............................................................................. 9 Predicted Habitat Field Assessment.............................................................................................. 10 Predicted Species .......................................................................................................................... 11 Ecoregional Assessments.............................................................................................................. 12 Biodiversity Management Areas and the Puget Trough Ecoregional Assessment....................... 13 Biodiversity Network Assessment.......................................................................................................... 41 Kitsap County BMA ..................................................................................................................... 41 North Bay BMA............................................................................................................................ 42 Gig Harbor BMA .......................................................................................................................... 44 Greenwater River BMA ................................................................................................................ 45 Lake Bay BMA ............................................................................................................................. 47 McNeil Island BMA...................................................................................................................... 48 Ketron Island BMA....................................................................................................................... 49 Upland BMA................................................................................................................................. 50 Norse Peak BMA .......................................................................................................................... 54 Nisqually Delta BMA ................................................................................................................... 55 Puyallup River BMA .................................................................................................................... 61 Shoreline BMA ............................................................................................................................. 62 Upper Nisqually River BMA ........................................................................................................ 63 Lewis County BMA ...................................................................................................................... 65 Rainier BMA................................................................................................................................. 66 White River BMA......................................................................................................................... 68 Lower White River BMA.............................................................................................................. 69 Conclusion.............................................................................................................................................. 117 Recommendations ................................................................................................................................. 121 Policy and Programmatic Actions............................................................................................... 121 Long-Term Monitoring and Data Collection.............................................................................. 122 Public Education and Outreach................................................................................................... 122 Acquisition, Restoration and Other Conservation Efforts .......................................................... 123 3 Pierce County Biodiversity Network Assessment – August 2004 Tables 1. Primary Land Cover Codes and Definitions ........................................................................... 15 2a. Primary Driver Habitats for the Puget Trough Ecoregion ...................................................... 17 2b. Primary Driver Habitats for the Southwest Cascades Ecoregion............................................ 19 3. Amphibians Predicted to Occur in Each BMA....................................................................... 28 4. Birds Predicted to Occur in Each BMA.................................................................................. 29 5. Mammals Predicted to Occur in Each BMA........................................................................... 34 6. Reptiles Predicted to Occur in Each BMA ............................................................................. 36 7. Summary of Tables 3 through 6 by BMA............................................................................... 37 8. Predicted Species for the Kitsap BMA ................................................................................... 71 9. Predicted Species for the North Bay BMA............................................................................. 73 10. Predicted Species for the Gig Harbor BMA ........................................................................... 75 11. Predicted Species for the Greenwater River BMA ................................................................. 77 12. Predicted Species for the Lake Bay BMA .............................................................................. 80 13. Predicted Species for the McNeil Island BMA....................................................................... 82 14. Predicted Species for the Ketron Island BMA........................................................................ 84 15. Predicted Species for the Upland BMA.................................................................................. 86 16. Predicted Species for the Norse Peak BMA ........................................................................... 89 17. Predicted Species for the Nisqually Delta BMA .................................................................... 91 18. Predicted Species for the Puyallup River BMA...................................................................... 94 19. Predicted Species for the Shoreline BMA .............................................................................. 96 20. Predicted Species for the Upper Nisqually BMA ................................................................... 98 21. Predicted Species for the Lewis County BMA ....................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nisqually Transmission Line Relocation Project
    Nisqually Transmission Line Relocation Project Preliminary Environmental Assessment Bonneville Power Administration Fort Lewis Military Reservation Nisqually Indian Tribe Bureau of Indian Affairs October 2004 Nisqually Transmission Line Relocation Project Responsible Agencies and Tribe: U.S. Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration (Bonneville); U.S. Department of Defense, Fort Lewis Military Reservation (Fort Lewis); the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA); and the Nisqually Indian Tribe (Tribe). Name of Proposed Project: Nisqually Transmission Line Relocation Project Abstract: Bonneville proposes to remove and reroute two parallel transmission lines that cross the Nisqually Indian Reservation in Thurston County, Washington. Bonneville’s easement across the Reservation for a portion of the Olympia-Grand Coulee line has expired. Though Bonneville has a perpetual easement for the Olympia-South Tacoma line across the Reservation, the Tribe has asked Bonneville to remove both lines so the Tribe can eventually develop the land for its community. The land fronts State Route 510 and is across the highway from the Tribe’s Red Wind Casino. In addition, the Tribe would like Bonneville to remove the two lines from a parcel next to the Reservation that Fort Lewis owns. The Tribe is working with Fort Lewis to obtain this parcel, which also has frontage on SR 510. Bonneville is proposing to remove the portions of these lines on the Reservation and on the Fort-owned parcel and rebuild them south of SR 510 on Fort Lewis property. Fort Lewis is willing to have these lines on their federal property, in exchange for other in-holdings currently owned by Thurston County that the Tribe would purchase and turn over to Fort Lewis.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021-23 Capital Budget
    PROPOSED SENATE 2021-23 BIENNIAL CAPITAL BUDGET PSSB 5083 Ways & Means Committee SENATE CHAIR/ RANKING MEMBER SENATE WAYS & MEANS COMMITTEE March 2021 http://www.leg.wa.gov/Senate/Committees/WM/Pages/default.aspx 1 AN ACT Relating to the capital budget; making appropriations and 2 authorizing expenditures for capital improvements; amending RCW 3 43.19.501, 28B.15.210, 28B.15.310, 28B.20.725, 28B.30.750, 4 28B.35.370, 28B.50.360, 28B.77.070, 43.63A.750, 39.35D.030, 5 43.88D.010, and 43.185.050; amending 2019 c 413 ss 1004, 1007, 1010, 6 1012, 1014, 1058, 1060, 1074, 1079, 1066, 1097, 1098, 1108, 1109, 7 2034, 2088, 2089, 3020, 3091, 3217, 3235, 3278, 3301, 4002, 4004, 8 5011, 5020, and 5047, and 2020 c 356 ss 6002, 1003, 1006, 1011, 1013, 9 1009, 1022, 1027, 3025, 5002, and 5011 (uncodified); reenacting and 10 amending RCW 43.155.050; creating new sections; repealing 2019 c 413 11 ss 1059 and 1107 (uncodified); making appropriations; and declaring an emergency.12 13 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON: 14 NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. (1) A capital budget is hereby adopted 15 and, subject to the provisions set forth in this act, the several 16 dollar amounts hereinafter specified, or so much thereof as shall be 17 sufficient to accomplish the purposes designated, are hereby 18 appropriated and authorized to be incurred for capital projects 19 during the period beginning with the effective date of this act and 20 ending June 30, 2023, out of the several funds specified in this act.
    [Show full text]
  • Chambers Creek
    Section 3 - Physical and Environmental Inventory 3.1 Chambers Creek – Clover Creek Drainage Basin 3.2 Puyallup River Drainage Basin 3.3 Sewer Service Basins in the Puyallup and White River Drainage Basins 3.4 Nisqually River Drainage Basin 3.5 Kitsap Drainage Basin 3.6 City of Tacoma - North End WWTP 3.7 Joint Base Lewis Mcchord Sewer System – Tatsolo Point WWTP Pierce County Public Works and Utilities – Sewer Utility Unified Sewer Plan Update Section 3 Section 3 – Physical and Environmental Inventory Section 3 documents the land-use and environmental tenants of the four major basins in Pierce County and are organized around those basins. Chambers Creek – Clover Creek Drainage Basin - Section 3.1 Puyallup River Drainage Basin – Section 3.2 Nisqually River Drainage Basin – Section 3.4 Kitsap Drainage Basin – Section 3.5 3.1 Chambers Creek – Clover Creek Drainage Basin The Chambers Creek - Clover Creek Drainage Basin (Basin) is located in central Pierce County, between Puget Sound on the west and the ridge above the Puyallup River Valley on the east. Point Defiance and the southwest shore of Commencement Bay serve as the basin’s northern boundary, and the City of DuPont lies on the southern boundary. The basin encompasses approximately 104,258 acres (117 square miles) of land including the Cities of DuPont, including Northwest Landing, University Place, Lakewood, and Northwest Tacoma, Fircrest, the Towns of Ruston, and Steilacoom, as well as portions of Fort Lewis and McChord Military Reservations, and the unincorporated communities of South Hill, Frederickson, Mid County, Graham, Parkland, and Spanaway. 3.1.1 Topography Lowland topography is generally flat to gently rolling.
    [Show full text]
  • MCNEIL ISLAND INVENTORY and LONG-RANGE PLANNING Process REPORT
    MCNEIL ISLAND INVENTORY AND LONG-RANGE PLANNING Process REPORT November 2012 Main dock and former McNeil Island Corrections Center complex Entrance to the Special Commitment Center Butterworth Reservoir “Helping Communities and Organizations Create Their Best Futures” To accommodate persons with disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats by calling the Office of Financial Management (OFM) at 360-902-0555. TTY/TDD users should contact OFM via the Washington Relay Service at 711 or 1-800-833-6388. “Helping Communities and Organizations Create Their Best Futures” Founded in 1988, we are an interdisciplinary strategy and analysis firm providing 2025 First Avenue, Suite 800 integrated, creative and analytically rigorous approaches to complex policy and Seattle, Washington 98121 planning decisions. Our team of strategic planners, policy and financial analysts, P (206) 324-8760 economists, cartographers, information designers and facilitators work together www.berkconsulting.com to bring new ideas, clarity, and robust frameworks to the development of analytically-based and action-oriented plans. Bonnie Berk, Principal Natasha Fedo, Project Manager/Lead Analyst Dawn Couch, Analyst Gary Simonson, Project Associate Alex Krieg, Project Associate Michele Eakins-TeSelle, Project Associate - November 2012 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Populations of Chinook Salmon in Puget Sound
    NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-78 Independent Populations of Chinook Salmon in Puget Sound July 2006 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS Series The Northwest Fisheries Science Center of the National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, uses the NOAA Techni- cal Memorandum NMFS series to issue informal scientific and technical publications when complete formal review and editorial processing are not appropriate or feasible due to time constraints. Documents published in this series may be referenced in the scientific and technical literature. The NMFS-NWFSC Technical Memorandum series of the Northwest Fisheries Science Center continues the NMFS- F/NWC series established in 1970 by the Northwest & Alaska Fisheries Science Center, which has since been split into the Northwest Fisheries Science Center and the Alaska Fisheries Science Center. The NMFS-AFSC Techni- cal Memorandum series is now being used by the Alaska Fisheries Science Center. Reference throughout this document to trade names does not imply endorsement by the National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA. This document should be cited as follows: Ruckelshaus, M.H., K.P. Currens, W.H. Graeber, R.R. Fuerstenberg, K. Rawson, N.J. Sands, and J.B. Scott. 2006. Independent populations of Chinook salmon in Puget Sound. U.S. Dept. Commer., NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-78, 125 p. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-78 Independent Populations of Chinook Salmon in Puget Sound Mary H. Ruckelshaus,
    [Show full text]
  • Greenwater Access and Travel Management Project Environmental Assessment
    United States Department of Agriculture Greenwater Access and Travel Management Project Environmental Assessment Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie Snoqualmie November Forest Service National Forest Ranger District 2016 For More Information Contact: Snoqualmie Ranger District 902 SE North Bend Way North Bend, WA 98045 (425) 888-1421 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD- 3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form.
    [Show full text]
  • Child Sexual and Physical Abuse Investigation Protocols for Pierce County Washington Table of Contents
    Revised June 2012 CHILD SEXUAL AND PHYSICAL ABUSE INVESTIGATION PROTOCOLS FOR PIERCE COUNTY WASHINGTON TABLE OF CONTENTS Mission Statement ................................................................................ I. Definitions ............................................................................................. II. Agency Roles and Responsibilities ..................................................... 1. Law Enforcement ........................................................................ a. Suspect interviews b. Protective custody 2. Child Protective Services ............................................................ 3. Emergency Medical Services ..................................................... 4. Medical Providers ...................................................................... 5. Medical Examiner ......................................................................... 6. Prosecuting Attorney ................................................................... 7. Attorney General’s Office ............................................................ 8. Mary Bridge Children’s Hospital and Health ................................ Center Children’s Advocacy Center/Child Abuse Intervention Department a. Joint Investigations 9. School ......................................................................................... 10. Crystal Judson Family Justice Center ........................................ 11. Sexual Assault Center for Pierce County ................................... 12. Comprehensive Life Resources
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 13 -- Puget Sound, Washington
    514 Puget Sound, Washington Volume 7 WK50/2011 123° 122°30' 18428 SKAGIT BAY STRAIT OF JUAN DE FUCA S A R A T O 18423 G A D A M DUNGENESS BAY I P 18464 R A A L S T S Y A G Port Townsend I E N L E T 18443 SEQUIM BAY 18473 DISCOVERY BAY 48° 48° 18471 D Everett N U O S 18444 N O I S S E S S O P 18458 18446 Y 18477 A 18447 B B L O A B K A Seattle W E D W A S H I N ELLIOTT BAY G 18445 T O L Bremerton Port Orchard N A N 18450 A 18452 C 47° 47° 30' 18449 30' D O O E A H S 18476 T P 18474 A S S A G E T E L N 18453 I E S C COMMENCEMENT BAY A A C R R I N L E Shelton T Tacoma 18457 Puyallup BUDD INLET Olympia 47° 18456 47° General Index of Chart Coverage in Chapter 13 (see catalog for complete coverage) 123° 122°30' WK50/2011 Chapter 13 Puget Sound, Washington 515 Puget Sound, Washington (1) This chapter describes Puget Sound and its nu- (6) Other services offered by the Marine Exchange in- merous inlets, bays, and passages, and the waters of clude a daily newsletter about future marine traffic in Hood Canal, Lake Union, and Lake Washington. Also the Puget Sound area, communication services, and a discussed are the ports of Seattle, Tacoma, Everett, and variety of coordinative and statistical information.
    [Show full text]
  • Dupont Heritage Plan
    1 DuPont Heritage Plan Presented to the City of DuPont By the DuPont Historical Society 2014 “In a nutshell, planning is the process of figuring out where you want to go, evaluating where you are now, and identifying how you can reach your destination……. Susan L. Henry Renaud, Preservation Planning, National Park Service 2 Introduction Historic places are important to every community. In an age of change, they help provide a sense of needed continuity. Indeed, they greatly contribute to a sense of place which can unite residents. Also historic places, when properly presented, can attract tourists to a town. This would naturally benefit the local economy. The City of DuPont is blessed with many significant historic places. They include both buildings and sites. Together these places tell the amazing story of the DuPont area. This story began with the Nisqually Indian occupation of the land. It continued with the Euro-American explorers of the late 18th and early 19th Centuries. Then the British owned Hudson’s Bay Company in the 19th Century established a sequential series of trading posts called Fort Nisqually that changed life forever in the Southern Puget Sound region. Encounters with Native Americans, Missionaries, and American Settlers brought cooperation and conflict. The Medicine Creek Treaty and Puget Sound Indian War shifted the power to the Americans and their homesteads. Change came again in the early 20th Century when the DuPont Company bought land and set up an explosives factory. The Company employees and their families were first housed in temporary tar paper shacks, but soon the historic village of DuPont took shape.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon River Access Management Plan
    United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Washington Fish and Wildlife Office 510 Desmond Dr. SE, Suite 102 Lacey, Washington 98 503 APR 2 6 20ll In Reply Refer To: 13410-2010-F-0488 Memorandum To: Superintendent, Mount Rainier National Park Ashford, Washington From: Manager, Washington Fish and Wildlife Lacey, Washington Subject: Biological Opinion for the Carbon River Access Management Plan This document transmits the Fish and Wildlife Service's Biological Opinion based on our review of the proposed Carbon River Access Managernent Plan to be implemented in Mount Rainier National Park, Pierce County, Washington. We evaluated effects on the threatened northern spotted owl (Sfrlx occidentalis caurina),marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus),bttll trout (Salvelinus confluentus), and designated bull trout critical habitat in accordance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Your July 29,2010 request for formal consultation was received on August 2,2010. This Biological Opinion is based on information provided in the June 28, 2010 Biological Assessment and on other information and correspondence shared between our respective staff. Copies of all correspondence regarding this consultation are on file at the Washington Fish and Wildlife Office in Lacey, Washington. If you have any questions about this mernorandum, the attached Biological Opinion, or your responsibilities under the Act, please contact Vince Harke at (360) 753-9529 or Carolyn Scafidi at (360) 753-4068. Endangered Species Act - Section 7 Consultation BIOLOGICAL OPINION U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Reference: 13410-2010-F-0488 Carbon River Access Management Plan Mount Rainier National Park Pierce County, Washington Agency: National Park Service Consultation Conducted By: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet for the NPDES Permit for the JBLM Solo Point WWTP
    Permit No.: WA-002195-4 Fort Lewis - Solo Point WWTP Fact Sheet NPDES Permit Number: WA-002195-4 Technical Contact: Tonya Lane 1-800-424-4372 (within Region 10) Email: [email protected] The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Plans To Reissue A Wastewater Discharge Permit To: Solo Point Wastewater Treatment Plant U.S. Department of Defense Department of the Army Joint Base Lewis McChord, WA 98433-5000 and The State of Washington Proposes to Certify the Permit and Issue a Consistency Determination EPA Proposes NPDES Permit Reissuance. EPA proposes to reissue a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit to the Solo Point Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) at the Fort Lewis Army Base. The permit sets conditions on the discharge--or release--of pollutants from the Solo Point WWTP to the Puget Sound. In order to ensure protection of water quality and human health, the permit places limits on the types and amounts of pollutants that can be discharged. This Fact Sheet includes: - information on public comment, public hearing, and appeal procedures - a description of the current discharge and current biosolids practices - a listing of past and proposed effluent limitations, and other conditions - a map and description of the discharge location - detailed technical material supporting the conditions in the permit The State of Washington Proposes Certification and Consistency Determination. The Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) intends to certify the NPDES permit for the Solo Point WWTP under section 401 of the Clean Water Act. Page 1 of 49 Permit No.: WA-002195-4 Fort Lewis - Solo Point WWTP Public Comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Naches Pass Trail
    NACHES PASS TRAIL. BARTLETT Student History Laura B. Downey Bartlett, "First immigrant train over the Cascade Mountains," Students history of the Northwest and the State of Washington. Tacoma: Smith-Digby, 1922. p. 161-166. http://books.google.com/books?id=K1pKAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Bartlett+Students +history+of+the+Northwest+and+the+State+of+Washington&source=bl&ots=GadQWoE2GL&sig =OiZgw6tbRohF5BDA1s9oOpvPj58&hl=en&ei=odqCTM-cFIb4swOQ- Kj3Bw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBYQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Epo ch%20XVI%201853&f=false In the early part of 1853, while the Territory of Washington was being brought into life, another most important move was being made, through and by which the newly made territory would be greatly benefitted. On the 15th day of April, 1853, at Independence, Missouri an immigrant train was leaving for great Oregon Territory, as they supposed, but which had, in the interim of their coining, become the Ter- ritory of Washington. The founders of this train, with their families, household goods, supplies and other necessary equip- ments, loaded into a dead-" wagon, drawn by oxen, though a few had horses, started on their long, laborious journey- to an unknown country-in number less than one hundred-people, all told. They were six months on the way, but increased their numbers enroute to one hundred and seventy- five people, by smaller companies joining them. On leaving Independence, the party realized the necessity of having a Captain, and to that end Mr. James Biles was chosen, with William R. Downey, Bartolomew Baker, Charles Biles, and Nelson Sargent as Assistants.
    [Show full text]