Nathalie Neumann East Asian Art in the Gurlitt Collection – Tracing the Relationship Between Objects and Actors
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ISSN: 2511–7602 Journal for Art Market Studies 3 (2018) Nathalie Neumann East Asian Art in the Gurlitt Collection – Tracing the Relationship between Objects and Actors ABSTRACT focus of this article is on methods, resources, and results of provenance research, a selec- Research on East Asian objects found in the tion of bowls, prints and tsuba was chosen for so-called Gurlitt collection revealed new demonstration purposes, as they are missing information about the objects formerly in the individual signs (stamps, seals etc.) which stock-in-trade of the dealer Hildebrand Gurlitt, would allow establishing a direct connection to as well as almost forgotten collector’s histories, a previous owner. A summary of the research dealers’ channels and networks on the Europe- results about all works from Gurlitt’s holdings an market for East Asian art during the decades is continuously updated and available to the from 1930 to 1950. While Gurlitt’s main interest public. Even though some questions remain un- lay in Western pictures, there were also a small answered, the results of the author’s work may number of East Asian art objects found in this lead to increased access and further research of stock, most of which came from Japan. The ob- archives in museums, on the art market and on jects include ten ceramic bowls and a group of collectors, casting greater light on intertwined twelve tsuba, but also a bronze sculpture from relations, which is particularly challenging in Thailand and a scroll painting (Kakemono), the field of provenance research. and eighteen Japanese colour woodcuts. As the With regard to the so-called Gurlitt collection, which was seized in the spring of 2012 at the home of Cornelius Gurlitt (1932-2014), son of the art dealer Hildebrand Gurlitt (1895- 1956), research was concluded after five years of intense work, producing an extensive http://www.fokum-jams.org; DOI 10.23690/jams.v2i3.72 Journal for Art Market Studies 3 (2018) Nathalie Neumann East Asian Art in the Gurlitt collection – Tracing the relationship between objects and actors exhibition catalogue1 as well as four comprehensive publications on the stock-in-trade and biography of Hildebrand Gurlitt.2 Almost, it seemed as if everything was said and done. He was the son of the renowned art historian Cornelius Gurlitt (1850-1938) and trained as an art historian himself. When his career as a museum director ended with the National Socialists’ rise to power, he first ran a gallery in Hamburg before expanding his art market activities, soon becoming one of the most successful dealers on the French art market under Nazi occupation when tasked to act on behalf of the special buying commission “Sonderauftrag Linz” and museums in Germany. At his death in 1956 he left a large stock of about a thousand art works with unknown provenance to his family. The clarification of their provenance was the objective of the research project carried out on behalf of the German Ministry of Culture. A summary of the research results about all works from Gurlitt’s holdings is continuously updated and available to the public on the homepage www.lostart.de, hosted by the German Lost Art Foundation (DZK).3 The author of this article participated in the project as a freelance researcher on European and in particular on East Asian art. Reflecting his taste and strategies, the stock of the art historian and dealer Hildebrand Gurlitt currently holds several hundreds of prints of so-called “degenerate art”, but also paintings, drawings and prints from the sixteenth to the nineteenth centuries, by German, French, Dutch or Flemish artists. It is perhaps generally less known that there were also a small number of East Asian art objects among them, most of which came from Japan. The stock includes ten ceramic bowls and a group of twelve tsuba, but also a bronze sculpture from Thailand and a scroll painting (Kakemono), and eighteen Japa- nese colour woodcuts. As the focus of this article is on methods, resources, and results of provenance research, a selection of bowls, prints and tsuba was chosen by the author for demonstration purposes, as they are missing individual signs (stamps, seals etc.) which would allow a direct connection to a previous owner. Even though provenance research is close to the history of collecting, it also must consider the special context of the Nation- al Socialist regime legalising the looting of art works in the period from 1933 to 1945. An autopsy of these items will therefore be presented before placing them into the context of collection history. All objects presented in this article are multiples, i.e. each work may have been produced in several copies. Without individual marking, such as a seal or a stamp, the prior own- ership of these works is very difficult to determine clearly, presenting a special challenge 1 Gurlitt: Status report, edited by Kunstmuseum Bern and Kunst- und Ausstellungshalle der Bundesrepub- lik Deutschland GmbH (München: Hirmer Verlag, 2.2018). 2 Meike Hoffmann, Nicola Kuhn, Hitlers Kunsthändler: Hildebrand Gurlitt 1895-1956 (München: C.H.Beck 2016); Catherine Hickley, Gurlitts Schatz: Hitlers Kunsthändler und sein geheimes Erbe (Wien:Czernin Verlag 2016); and Maurice Philip Remy, Der Fall Gurlitt: Die wahre Geschichte über Deutschlands größten Kunstskandal (München: Europaverlag 2017); Oliver Meier, Michael Feller and Stefanie Christ, Der Gur- litt-Komplex: Bern und die Raubkunst (Zürich: Chronos Verlag, 2017). 3 The object ID numbers correspond to those of the project and allow to search the objects online. The image rights lie with the prosecutor of Augsburg and the Federal archives Bundesarchiv Koblenz. 2 Journal for Art Market Studies 3 (2018) Nathalie Neumann East Asian Art in the Gurlitt collection – Tracing the relationship between objects and actors for provenance research. However, research in collaboration with specialists made it possible to begin by identifying the objects and the respective artists.4 Ceramics For two of the ten Oribe-style ceramic bowls (ID 532986, ID 532987) no distinguishing features could be found on the objects. A multi-coloured ceramic bowl (ID 521805) in the shape of a Japanese tea bowl but with fine patterns in Arabic calligraphy points to Islamic culture, but as a mass object produced for export, it could not be clearly assigned to either a group of artists or a previous owner. On the bottom of the ceramic tea bowl in black and white glaze (fig. 1) there is the artist’s seal of Kato Shuntai (1802-1877), a Japanese potter from Seto. His real name was Katō Sōshirō, his nickname Nihei, he became known as Shuntai III.5 Already as a 15-year-old, he designed pottery in the Ofuke-yaki ceramic style and exe- cuted various techniques, such as red painting, Shino-yaki, and Oribe-yaki. He was a Mugiwa- rade-style master who used red, white and black motifs before burning. Being one of the last representatives of the local Seto-yaki ceramics “Hongyo”, his seal is a guarantee of a Fig. 1: Oribe bowl black, (ID 532990); quality brand (figs. 2 and 3). © Bundesarchiv Koblenz. The Karatsu-style ceramic bowl (ID 532985 ) in a light tone with speck- led glaze bears on the bottom the hand-stamp of the Zōroku family, named after the master potter Mashimizu Zōroku (1822-1877) from Kyoto. But since all members/ masters of this family from the fourth generation onward use this seal to this day, the bowl is difficult to date. It is a piece of monochro- Fig. 2: Oribe bowl (ID 532985) ; © Bundesarchiv Ko- blenz. 4 My special thanks go to the curator of Museum of Asian Art SMPK Berlin, Dr Alexander Hofmann, who supported my research with his extensive knowledge and network. 5 Turning Point: Oribe and the Arts of Sixteenth-Century Japan (New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2003), 200. 3 Journal for Art Market Studies 3 (2018) Nathalie Neumann East Asian Art in the Gurlitt collection – Tracing the relationship between objects and actors matic earthenware originally made in Kyoto, but also mass-produced and exported since the nineteenth century. Since ceramic bowls rarely bear owner’s signs, they cannot be easily traced as a single object with or with- out artist’s signature on the art market or in private collections, especially with regard to the period before 1933. For this reason it seemed helpful to investigate them as a group in context. A photograph of the East Asian ceramic bowls presented a starting point. Signed “Dr. Rumpf” and identifying the bowls on the back, the picture was part of the extensive estate of Hilde- brand Gurlitt, which included, in addition to his corre- spondence, more than 2,000 photographs (fig. 4). 6 At this point, the analysis of the art market in its respec- tive historical context and its actors becomes essential for provenance research in tracing objects, applying the same methods as a collector or a dealer would. Fig. 3: Stamped mark Zōroku (ID 532985); © Bundesarchiv Koblenz. The group photograph of ceramics was used here as a document just as the dealer would have done when offering his articles with a photograph. Conse- quently, a copy of the original photo was sent to all collections of East Asian art in the German-speaking countries and to museums in Paris, where Hildebrand Gurlitt acquired most of his art works during the German occupation. Unfortunately, no offers or corre- spondence with Gurlitt on East Asian items have been found in these public collections to date. Even though this result may seem disappointing, the absence of correspondence does not necessarily mean that there was no contact with Gurlitt. This result needs also to be put into historical context.