DOCSLIB.ORG

Workplace Bullying: Causes, Consequences, and Intervention Strategies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Workplace Bullying: Causes, Consequences, and Intervention Strategies M. Sandy Hershcovis, Tara C. Reich, and Karen Niven Workplace bullying: causes, consequences, and intervention strategies Working paper Original citation: Hershcovis, M. Sandy, Reich, Tara C. and Niven, Karen (2015) Workplace bullying: causes, consequences, and intervention strategies. SIOP White Paper Series, Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, UK, London Originally available from Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/66031/ Available in LSE Research Online: April 2016 © 2015 Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Inc. LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. SIOP White Paper Series Workplace Bullying: Causes, Consequences, and Intervention Strategies M. Sandy Hershcovis - University of Manitoba Tara C. Reich - London School of Economics and Political Science Karen Niven - University of Manchester A White Paper prepared by the International Affairs Committee of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 440 E Poe Rd, Suite 101 Bowling Green, OH 43402 With support of the Alliance for Organizational Psychology (AOP) Copyright 2015 Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Inc. SIOP White Paper Series Special thanks to the White Papers Subcommittee of the SIOP International Af- fairs Committee (IAC): Angelo DeNisi (Chair) and Lynda Zugec. We also wish to express our appreciation to the IAC White Paper Series Board: John C. Scott, Stuart C. Carr, and Soo Min Toh. Table of Contents Authors ................................................................................................................... 3 Abstract ................................................................................................................... 4 Why Do People Bully at Work? ............................................................................... 5 Perpetrator Characteristics .............................................................................. 6 Target Characteristics ...................................................................................... 6 Situational Characteristics ............................................................................... 8 What Are the Consequences of Workplace Bullying? ............................................. 9 Human Costs ................................................................................................... 9 Organizational Costs ..................................................................................... 10 Spillover/Crossover Costs ............................................................................. 10 Cultural Considerations ......................................................................................... 11 What Can Organizations and Victims Do About Workplace Bullying? .................. 13 Primary Interventions ..................................................................................... 13 Secondary Interventions ................................................................................ 14 Tertiary Interventions ..................................................................................... 14 Practical recommendations ................................................................................... 15 References ........................................................................................................... 16 2 SIOP White Paper Series Authors M. Sandy Hershcovis University of Manitoba (University of Calgary beginning January 1, 2015) Sandy Hershcovis conducts research on the psychology of workplace ag- gression (e.g., abusive supervision, workplace incivility, workplace bully- ing), sexual harassment, and worker well-being. She is currently coediting a book on the research and theory of workplace aggression for Cambridge Univer- sity Press. Her research has been published in such outlets as the Journal of Ap- plied Psychology, the Journal of Organizational Behavior, and the Journal of Oc- cupational and Organizational Psychology. Tara C. Reich London School of Economics and Political Science Tara Reich is an assistant professor in the Department of Management at the London School of Economics and Political Science. She received her BA (Hons, 2005) in Psychology from the University of Western Ontario and her MA (2007) in Social Psychology and her PhD (2011) in Organiza- tional Behaviour from the University of Manitoba. Reich’s research focuses on employee reactions to witnessed mistreatment. She has published her work in the Journal of Applied Psychology, the Journal of Organizational Behaviour, and Work & Stress. Karen Niven University of Manchester [email protected] Karen Niven (PhD, University of Sheffield, UK) is an associate professor of Organizational Psychology. Her research focuses on emotion regula- tion and workplace aggression, and uses a variety of methods, including diary studies, social network analysis, and field experiments. She has published her work in journals such as Human Relations, Journal of Occupational and Organiza- tional Psychology, and Journal of Business Ethics, and has edited a popular sci- ence book on emotion. 3 SIOP White Paper Series Workplace bullying is detrimental to employees and organizations, yet in a meta-analytic review of studies representing a range of countries (North America, Scandinavian, and other European), ap- proximately 15% of employees report being victimized at work (Nielsen, Matthiesen, & Einarsen, 2010). Workplace bullying is de- fined as repeated exposure, over a period of time, to negative acts such as abuse, teasing, ridicule, and social exclusion (Einarsen, 2000). Researchers have traditionally conceptualized bullying to in- volve face-to-face interactions; however, the increasing use of tech- nology in the workplace has seen a rise in “cyberbullying,” whereby employees may be victimized over email or social networking web- sites (Weatherbee, 2010). Though bullying behaviors can originate from anyone at work (e.g., coworkers, supervisors, or subordinates), more often than not, the perpetrator has more power or perceived power than the target (Mikkelsen & Einarsen, 2002). In addition to research examining workplace bullying, a broad literature has started to develop that examines highly related constructs, including abusive supervision (abusive behavior from supervisors; Tepper, 2000), social undermining (negative be- havior that interferes with a target’s abilities to maintain positive relationships at work; Duffy, Ganster, & Pagon, 2002), and incivility (low intensity deviant acts with ambigu- ous intent to harm the target; Andersson & Pearson, 1999). Although these constructs all differ conceptually, meta-analytic research that compares these constructs against a series of consequences has found that, by and large, there is little to no difference in the magnitude of consequences from these different constructs (Hershcovis, 2011). As a result, we use terms like “bullying” and “aggression” interchangeably to refer to the range of aggression constructs studied in this literature. Some common examples of workplace bullying behaviors include: Taking away responsibility from someone or replacing it with more unpleas- ant tasks Ignoring someone’s opinions Persistently criticizing someone’s work Spreading gossip or rumors about someone Ignoring or excluding someone at work Hinting to someone that they should quit their job 4 SIOP White Paper Series Over the past 2 decades, researchers have examined extensively the predictors and consequences of workplace bullying. This body of research has found that predictors of workplace bullying typically fall into three broad categories: (a) perpetrator charac- teristics, (b) target characteristics, and (c) situational characteristics. Similarly, the consequences of workplace bullying have a range of costs including: (a) human costs, (b) organizational costs, and (c) spillover costs. The purpose of this white paper is to examine the key predictors and consequences of workplace bullying within each of the above categories. We will then discuss rec- ommendations aimed to help organizations and individuals prevent and cope with workplace bullying. “Although personality is indeed one factor that predicts this type of behavior, workplace bullying does not occur in a social vacuum.” Why Do People Bully at Work? This is a simple question with a complex answer. It is tempting to assume that bully- ing is a function of perpetrator personality. Although personality is indeed one factor that predicts this type of behavior, workplace bullying does not occur in a social vacu- um. Rather, it occurs in the context of an organizational environment that may aggra- vate or mitigate the incidence of workplace bullying. Workplace bullying also occurs in the context of a relationship, and both members contribute to that relationship. Therefore, the perpetrator–target relationship is likely to influence the enactment and experience of workplace bullying
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cross Disciplinary Issues in Workplace Bullying
    Answering workplace bullying’s key questions 1 Answering Five Key Questions about Workplace Bullying: How Communication Scholarship Provides Thought Leadership for Transforming Abuse at Work Pamela Lutgen-Sandvik (Ph.D., Arizona State University) is an Associate Professor in the Department of Communication & Journalism at the University of New Mexico, USA. She researches destructive communication in organizations and the communicative processes associated with positive organizing. Email: [email protected] Telephone: 505-331-4724 Fax: 505-277-2068 Mailing: Department of Communication & Journalism University of New Mexico MSC03 2240; 1 University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001 Sarah H. Tracy (Ph.D., University of Colorado, Boulder) is an Associate Professor and Director of The Project for Wellness and Work-Life in the Hugh Downs School of Human Communication at Arizona State University, USA. She studies emotion and work-life wellness. Email: [email protected] Telephone: 480-965-7709 FAX: 480-965-4291 Mailing: Hugh Downs School of Human Communication Arizona State University PO Box 871205 Tempe, AZ 87287-1205 Management Communication Quarterly Answering workplace bullying’s key questions 2 Abstract: Organizational communication research is vital for understanding and addressing workplace bullying, a problem that affects nearly half of working adults and has devastating results on employee well-being and organizational productivity. A communication approach illustrates the toxic complexity of workplace bullying, as it is condoned through societal discourses, sustained by receptive workplace cultures, and perpetuated through local interactions. Examining these (macro, meso, and micro) communicative elements addresses the most pressing questions about workplace bullying including: 1) how abuse manifests, 2) how employees respond, 3) why it is so harmful, 4) why resolution is so difficult, and 5) how it might be resolved.
    [Show full text]
  • A Theory of Biobehavioral Response to Workplace Incivility
    BIOBEHAVIORAL RESPONSE TO INCIVILITY THE EMBODIMENT OF INSULT: A THEORY OF BIOBEHAVIORAL RESPONSE TO WORKPLACE INCIVILITY Lilia M. Cortina University of Michigan 530 Church Street Ann Arbor, MI 48104 [email protected] M. Sandy Hershcovis University of Calgary 2500 University Drive NW Calgary, AB T2N 1N4 [email protected] Kathryn B.H. Clancy University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 607 S. Mathews Ave. Urbana, IL 61801 [email protected] (in press, Journal of Management) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors are grateful to Christine Porath, who provided feedback on an earlier draft of this article. Hershcovis acknowledges support from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Clancy acknowledges support from NSF grant #1916599, the Illinois Leadership Center, and the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science & Technology, and thanks her trainees as well as the attendees of the 2019 Transdisciplinary Research on Incivility in STEM Contexts Workshop for their brilliant thinking and important provocations. BIOBEHAVIORAL RESPONSE TO INCIVILITY 1 Abstract This article builds a broad theory to explain how people respond, both biologically and behaviorally, when targeted with incivility in organizations. Central to our theorizing is a multifaceted framework that yields four quadrants of target response: reciprocation, retreat, relationship repair, and recruitment of support. We advance the novel argument that these behaviors not only stem from biological change within the body, but also stimulate such change. Behavioral responses that revolve around affiliation, and produce positive social connections, are most likely to bring biological benefits. However, social and cultural features of an organization can stand in the way of affiliation, especially for employees holding marginalized identities.
    [Show full text]
  • Blaming the Organization for Abusive Supervision: the Roles of Perceived Organizational Support and Supervisor’S Organizational Embodiment
    Journal of Applied Psychology © 2012 American Psychological Association 2013, Vol. 98, No. 1, 158–168 0021-9010/13/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0030687 RESEARCH REPORT Blaming the Organization for Abusive Supervision: The Roles of Perceived Organizational Support and Supervisor’s Organizational Embodiment Mindy K. Shoss Robert Eisenberger Saint Louis University University of Houston Simon Lloyd D. Restubog Thomas J. Zagenczyk Australian National University Clemson University Why do employees who experience abusive supervision retaliate against the organization? We apply organizational support theory to propose that employees hold the organization partly responsible for abusive supervision. Depending on the extent to which employees identify the supervisor with the organization (i.e., supervisor’s organizational embodiment), we expected abusive supervision to be associated with low perceived organizational support (POS) and consequently with retribution against the organization. Across 3 samples, we found that abusive supervision was associated with decreased POS as moderated by supervisor’s organizational embodiment. In turn, reduced POS was related to heightened counterproductive work behavior directed against the organization and lowered in-role and extra-role performance. These findings suggest that employees partly attribute abusive supervision to negative valuation by the organization and, consequently, behave negatively toward and withhold positive contributions to it. Keywords: abusive supervision, perceived organizational support, workplace victimization Supervisors play an important role in the direction, evaluation, carried out on behalf of the organization (Aquino & Bommer, and coaching of employees. Some supervisors are supportive, 2003; Tepper, 2007). fostering subordinates’ abilities and empowering them to achieve Prior research has largely viewed the organization as an “inno- their goals (House, 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the International Ombudsman Association
    Journal of the International Ombudsman Association Journal of the International Ombudsman Association V O L U M E 3 , N U M B E R 2 , 2 0 1 0 volume 3, number 2, 2010 1 Journal of the International Ombudsman Association TABLE OF CONTENTS Editorial Staff ......................................................................................................5 I ntroduction ........................................................................................................6 JENN IFER L. MOUMNEH, PRESIDENT, IOA Editorial: Bullying — What Can Ombudsmen Do? ...........................................7 DAV ID MILLER Some Things You Need to Know but may have been Afraid to Ask: A Researcher Speaks to Ombudsmen about Workplace Bullying ................10 LORALE IGH KEASHLY Abstract: Workplace bullying is repeated and prolonged hostile mistreatment of one or more people at work. It has tremendous potential to escalate, drawing in others beyond the initial actor-target relationship. Its effects can be devastating and widespread individually, organizationally and beyond. It is fundamentally a systemic phenomenon grounded in the organization’s culture. In this article, I identify from my perspective as a researcher and professional in this area current thinking and research findings that may be useful for ombudsmen in their deliberations and investigations as well as in their intervention and management of these hostile behaviors and relationships. Key Words: Ombudsmen, workplace bullying, workplace aggression Cases Involving Allegations of Workplace Bullying: Threats to Ombuds Neutrality and Other Challenges ..................................24 TOM SEBOK AND MARY CHAVEZ RUDOLPH Abstract: Organizational ombuds who assist constituents in cases involving allegations of workplace bullying face a number of challenges. Some of the most significant challenges involve potential threats to ombuds neu- trality. This article will briefly review ombuds neutrality and then explore many factors which can promote bias, and threaten ombuds neutrality.
    [Show full text]
  • Supervisors' Toxicity As Predictor of Subordinates' Counter-Productive
    The Journal of Applied Business Research – September/October 2016 Volume 32, Number 5 Supervisors’ Toxicity As Predictor Of Subordinates’ Counter-Productive Work Behavior In Nigerian Public Hospitals Justin Mgbechi Odinioha Gabriel, Ph.D., Rivers State University of Science and Technology, Nigeria ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to empirically examine the association of Supervisors’ Toxicity and Subordinates’ Counter-productive Work-behaviour in the Nigerian Public Hospitals. Counter-productive Work -behaviour (criterion variable) is further operationalized using five measures – abuse, production deviation, sabotage, theft, and withdrawal. The cross-sectional survey design is adopted and data is generated using the structured questionnaire. 197 respondents comprising doctors, nursing staff, lab technicians and other administrative staff selected from an accessible population of 402 staff provided responses to the questions. A total of five hypotheses are proposed and tested using descriptive and inferential statistical tools. Results indicate significant relationships in all hypothetical instances, thereby implying an association between Supervisors’ Toxicity and Subordinates’ Counter-productive Work- behavior. The study therefore concludes that Subordinates are quick to reciprocate Supervisors’ Toxicity through Counter-productive Work- behavior of transferring aggression to either peers or other identifiable assets of the organization. The study further recommends a more emotionally oriented approach to the management of superior-subordinate relationships with emphasis on the training and retraining of supervisors regarding emotional intelligence as well as conflict and human relations issues. Keywords: Supervisors’ Toxicity; Subordinates; Counterproductive behaviour; Nigeria INTRODUCTION Army leaders must set high standards, lead by example, do what is legally and morally right, and influence other people to do the same.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Workplace Bullying on Workplace Deviant Behaviors
    CAPITAL UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, ISLAMABAD Impact of Workplace Bullying on Workplace Deviant Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Negative Affectivity and Moderating Role of Internal Locus of Control by Samiullah A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment for the degree of Master of Science in the Faculty of Management & Social Sciences Department of Management Sciences 2019 i Copyright c 2019 by Samiullah All rights reserved. No part of this thesis may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, by any information storage and retrieval system without the prior written permission of the author. ii Dedicated to my Mother, whose prayers enabled me to have success in all spheres of life CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL Impact of Workplace Bullying on Workplace Deviant Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Negative Affectivity and Moderating Role of Internal Locus of Control by Samiullah (MMS163033) THESIS EXAMINING COMMITTEE S. No. Examiner Name Organization (a) External Examiner Dr. Nadeem Talib NUML, Islamabad (b) Internal Examiner Dr. Sajid Bashir CUST, Islamabad (c) Supervisor Dr. Mueen Aizaz Zafar CUST, Islamabad Dr. Mueen Aizaz Zafar Thesis Supervisor May, 2019 Dr. Sajid Bashir Dr. Arshad Hassan Head Dean Dept. of Management Sciences Faculty of Management & Social Sciences May, 2019 May, 2019 iv Author's Declaration I, Samiullah hereby state that my MS thesis titled \Impact of Workplace Bul- lying on Workplace Deviant Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Negative Affectivity and Moderating Role of Internal Locus of Control" is my own work and has not been submitted previously by me for taking any degree from Capital University of Science and Technology, Islamabad or anywhere else in the country/abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • Abusive Supervision and Deviant Workplace Behavior: the Mediating Role of Work–Family Conflict
    Abusive Supervision and Deviant Workplace Behavior: The Mediating Role of Work–Family Conflict Aminah Ahmad, Institute of Social Science Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia Zoharah Omar, Department of Professional Development and Continuing Education, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia ABSTRACT The role of work–family conflict as a mechanism through which abusive supervision can trigger deviant workplace behavior has not been given much attention. Based on conservation of resources theory, reactance theory and previous research findings, a model has been developed to demonstrate that abusive supervision could increase the intensity of work–family conflict experienced by employees, which in turn could translate into deviant behaviors which are harmful to organizations. This model demonstrates how the integration of abusive supervision, work–family interface and deviant behavior literatures could provide a better understanding of employee engagement in deviant workplace behavior. Keywords: abusive supervision, work–family conflict, deviant workplace behavior INTRODUCTION Deviant workplace behavior continues to be a problem in organizations and has been reported to have a damaging impact on organizations (Appelbaum, Deguire, & Lay, 2005; Mawritz et al., 2012). There is a growing interest in this topic among researchers (Bennett & Robinson, 2000, 2003; Colbert, Mount, & Dalal, 2005; Dunlop & Lee, 2004; Harter, Witt, & Barrick, 2004; Marwitz et al., 2012) and evidence has shown that managers’ perceptions of employees’ overall performance are strongly affected by deviant behavior (Rotundo & Sackett, 2002). Deviant workplace behavior has been defined as an intentional behavior that violates organizational norms and poses a threat to the well-being of an organization or its members, or both (Robinson & Bennett, 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • When Leadership Fails – a View from the Lens of Four Employees Laurie L
    American Journal of Business Education – Third Quarter 2018 Volume 11, Number 3 When Leadership Fails – A View From The Lens Of Four Employees Laurie L. Barnes, Liberty University, USA Janice M. Spangenburg, Liberty University, USA ABSTRACT Leadership is a concept that has been used for decades and despite what we know about it there are many things left to the unknown. We must keep moving forward to search for answers as we seek to explain the many failures that exist today. For centuries, reports of lackluster and even abusive leadership in organizations have continued to be a negative force in organizations, adversely impacting culture and overall performance. Amid the challenges facing leaders as well as the necessity for rapid and continuous change in the organization, we see the development of many problems and consequent ails that need to be addressed. We are often left with supervisors that abuse without regard for the breakdown of loyalty, job satisfaction and the development of a solid and rich culture that can support thriving and positive organizational outcomes. This has been captured in the voices and experiences of individuals interviewed for this qualitative case study analysis, demonstrating the continued impact of leadership in modern day organizations and well as addressing the perplexing question of how to distinguish who would or would not be a best fit for leadership positions in today’s organizations. Despite years of research, theory and analysis, perhaps the greatest insight is gained through the lens of the employee. Keywords: Organizational Conflict; Leadership Styles; Leadership Behavior; Abusive Leadership; Abusive Supervision OVERVIEW eadership has been the foundation for many concepts, both positive and negative, that have surfaced in organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Abusive Supervision and Workplace Deviance and the Moderating Effects of Negative Reciprocity Beliefs
    Journal of Applied Psychology Copyright 2007 by the American Psychological Association 2007, Vol. 92, No. 4, 1159–1168 0021-9010/07/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1159 Abusive Supervision and Workplace Deviance and the Moderating Effects of Negative Reciprocity Beliefs Marie S. Mitchell and Maureen L. Ambrose University of Central Florida In this study, the authors examine the relationship between abusive supervision and employee workplace deviance. The authors conceptualize abusive supervision as a type of aggression. They use work on retaliation and direct and displaced aggression as a foundation for examining employees’ reactions to abusive supervision. The authors predict abusive supervision will be related to supervisor-directed deviance, organizational deviance, and interpersonal deviance. Additionally, the authors examine the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. They hypothesized that the relationship between abusive supervision and supervisor-directed deviance would be stronger when individuals hold higher negative reciprocity beliefs. The results support this hypotheses. The implications of the results for understanding destructive behaviors in the workplace are examined. Keywords: abusive supervision, workplace deviance, reciprocity In the last decade, there has been increased interest in harmful standing employee reactions. From a justice perspective, employ- or destructive behaviors in organizations. Much of this research ees react to the perceived unfairness of the abusive supervisor’s focuses on deviant behaviors of employees. (See Bennett & Rob- behavior. When employees feel they are treated unfairly, positive inson, 2003, for a review.) However, recently, research has exam- attitudes and behavior suffer (Tepper, 2000; Tepper et al., 1998). ined destructive behaviors managers commit—specifically, abu- Researchers also have used reactance theory as a foundation for sive supervision (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • New Perspectives on Third Party
    NEW PERSPECTIVES ON THIRD PARTY PERCEPTIONS OF MISTREATMENT By WARREN LEE COOK A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Carson College of Business JULY 2019 © Copyright by WARREN LEE COOK, 2019 All Rights Reserved i © Copyright by WARREN LEE COOK, 2019 All Rights Reserved i To the Faculty of Washington State University: The members of the Committee appointed to examine the dissertation of WARREN LEE COOK find it satisfactory and recommend that it be accepted. Kristine Kuhn, Ph.D., Chair Leah Sheppard, Ph.D. Thomas Tripp, Ph.D. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENT I would like to begin by acknowledging the support from my committee. Kristine Kuhn, the chair of my committee, has provided me with a wealth of professional advice, guidance in research, and assistance in navigating the job market. Her support has allowed me to develop foundational research skills, reach my professional goals, and start on the career that I entered this program to pursue. Tom Tripp has been my mentor since my time taking his courses as an undergraduate student and has been more influential than anyone else in developing my interest in organizational behavior and encouraging me to pursue a doctoral degree. From lending books to me as an undergraduate, to providing career advice, to sharing his teaching materials, he has deeply informed the way that I approach academia. Leah Sheppard has been an outstanding research collaborator, helping in the development of research ideas that have served as the core of my dissertation, and providing a wealth of valuable feedback that has helped me improve as a researcher.
    [Show full text]
  • Work Place Bullying on Deviant Work Behavior Among Nurses in Pakistan: Mediating Role of Interpersonal Conflict
    Impact of Workplace . Research WORK PLACE BULLYING ON DEVIANT WORK BEHAVIOR AMONG NURSES IN PAKISTAN: MEDIATING ROLE OF INTERPERSONAL CONFLICT Muhammad Umar Paracha1 & Khurram Shahzad2 Abstract This study investigates the relationship between workplace bullying, interpersonal conflict and deviant work behavior among nurses in the public sector in Pakistan. For this purpose the data were collected from 277 nurses working in government hospitals by using convenience sampling method. Findings showed that work place bullying results in deviant work behavior among nurses and this relationship is mediated by interpersonal conflict like negative emotional reaction, perceived disagreements and interference from and towards colleagues. The implications of the findings for hospital administrators and directions for future research are provided. Keyword: Work place bullying, interpersonal conflict and deviant work behavior, nurses. JEL Classification: Z 000 1 - Capital University of Sciences & Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan 2- Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan 887 PAKISTAN BUSINESS REVIEW JAN 2017 Impact of Workplace. Research Introduction “Bullying” has attained massive attention in organization research during the past era. Bullying has been repeatedly shown by researchers to have damaging consequences for the target, observers, and for the organization(Hauge et al.,2009). Fox and Stallworth (2004) stated that employees, who perceived to be target of bullying, experienced higher level of strain, anxiety and depression resulting in damaging emotions in their personalities. Scholars found painful consequences of bullying like harassment at workplace, turnover intention, absenteeism and low commitment, low job control, job insecurity, counterwork behavior (Yeun & Han, 2016; Hassan et al., 2015; Choi & Kim, 2015; Bano & Malik, 2013; Furnham & Siegel, 2012; Hoel et al., 2011;Hauge et al., 2010; Hauge et al., 2007; Sparks et al., 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Forgiveness and Attribution: When Abusive Supervision Enhances Performance
    Forgiveness and attribution: when abusive supervision enhances performance By: Jun Yang, Yonghong Liu, Madelynn Stackhouse, Wei Wang Yang, J., Liu, Y., Stackhouse, M. and Wang, W. (2020), "Forgiveness and attribution: when abusive supervision enhances performance", Journal of Managerial Psychology, 35(7/8), 575- 587. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-04-2019-0239 © Emerald Publishing Limited. This author accepted manuscript is deposited under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC) license. This means that anyone may distribute, adapt, and build upon the work for non- commercial purposes, subject to full attribution. If you wish to use this manuscript for commercial purposes, please contact [email protected]. Abstract: Purpose: While much research shows that abusive supervision reduces employee performance, the purpose of this study is to reverse the lens to question how and under what circumstances abusive supervision leads to enhanced employee performance. The authors argue that the linkages between abusive supervision and employee performance occurs via performance- promotion attributions and that employee levels of dispositional forgiveness alter the relationship between abusive supervision and employee interpretations of abuse, such that more forgiving individuals interpret abuse as more benign behavior designed to help them perform better (i.e. are performance promoting). Design/methodology/approach: In a three-wave field survey of 318 employees matched with 89 supervisors, employees completed measures of dispositional forgiveness (Time 1) abusive supervision (Time 1), and performance-promotion attributions of abusive supervision's motives (Time 2). Supervisors rated the job performance of their employees (Time 3). Multilevel structural equation modeling was employed to test a multilevel moderated mediation model.
    [Show full text]