Engineered in Vitro Models of Post-Implantation Human Development to Elucidate Mechanisms of Self-Organized Fate Specification During Embryogenesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Engineered in Vitro Models of Post-Implantation Human Development to Elucidate Mechanisms of Self-Organized Fate Specification During Embryogenesis Engineered In vitro models of post-implantation human development to elucidate mechanisms of self-organized fate specification during embryogenesis by Mukul Tewary A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering University of Toronto © Copyright by Mukul Tewary 2018 Engineered In vitro models of post-implantation human development to elucidate mechanisms of self-organized fate specification during embryogenesis Mukul Tewary Doctor of Philosophy Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering University of Toronto 2018 Abstract During embryogenesis, cells in different positions of the embryo acquire different fates in a seemingly autonomous process called ‘fate-patterning’. Fundamental studies have identified important signaling molecules (morphogens) that play crucial roles in coordinating developmental fate-patterning, examples include members of the transforming growth factor beta family – like bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), and Nodals. However, mechanistic understanding of how these morphogens coordinate fate-patterning remains unclear. Here we aim to apply bioengineering strategies to develop an in vitro model of developmental fate-patterning and employ it to interrogate the underlying mechanisms that govern this critical process. We first developed a robust, high-throughput platform to enable geometric-confinement of adherent cell types and employed it to screen various BMP4 supplemented defined media to identify conditions that coaxed geometrically-confined human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC) colonies to undergo peri-gastrulation-associated fate-patterning. This screen resulted in identification of defined conditions that spatially segregated compartments in the differentiating hPSC colonies expressing fate markers of trophoblast-like, primitive-streak-like, endoderm-like, mesoderm-like, and ectoderm-like tissues. Using a combination of experimental and ii computational-modelling approaches, we identified a stepwise mechanism of reaction-diffusion and positional-information underlying the observed peri-gastrulation-like fate-patterning. Here, a BMP4-Noggin reaction-diffusion network self-organized BMP signaling gradient, and this gradient patterned peri-gastrulation-associated fates in a manner consistent with positional- information. Furthermore, we found that Nodal signaling was necessary to induce the expression of the primitive-streak compartment – the precursor of gastrulation-derived fates. Interestingly, we also observed that Nodal signaling dissected gastrulation-associated and neurulation-associated gene expression profiles in differentiating hPSC lines. Specifically, in differentiating hPSCs, upregulation of Nodal signaling was observed in cells that upregulated a gene profile associated with gastrulation whereas absence of Nodal signaling correlated with upregulation of a neurulation-associated gene profile. We hypothesized that treatment of geometrically-confined hPSC colonies with BMP4 in the absence of Nodal signaling would induce fate patterning associated with neurulation. We observed experimental results consistent with this hypothesis and identified a conserved underlying mechanism of a stepwise model of reaction-diffusion and positional-information underlying the pre-neurulation-associated patterning as well. Taken together this work provides deep insight into how morphogens regulate early developmental stages of human embryogenesis – which have been previously inaccessible for experimentation. iii Acknowledgments Over the course of this PhD project, I have been incredibly fortunate to be mentored by several amazing scientists who have shaped my progress both in this project, and as an early career scientist; and to whom I am deeply indebted. First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor, Dr. Peter Zandstra for not only providing me with the opportunity to be trained in one of the best stem cell bioengineering labs in the world, but also for the remarkable level of support and patience that he has displayed both for me, and for this project. Peter, thank you very much for being a shining example and role model of a great scientist and a great leader; and thank you for continuing to challenge and inspire me to be better in many different aspects of my life. I will forever cherish and look back fondly at my time spent in the Zandstra lab. I would also like to thank my committee members – Drs. Janet Rossant, Penney Gilbert, and Aaron Wheeler. Thank you for investing a large amount of your time and effort to provide me with the support and constructive scientific critique I needed, and for remaining invested in my development and progress. Your contributions have been of immense value to how this project has evolved. I would like to convey my deep gratitude to all my remarkably talented lab-mates – Dr. Celine Bauwens, Dr. Charles Yoon, Curtis Woodford, Dr. Elia Piccinini, Dr. Emanuel Nazareth, Jennifer Ma, Joel Ostblom, Dr. Laura Prochazka, Dr. Nafees Rahman, Dr. Nika Shakiba, Nimalan Thavandiran, visiting trainees – Dominika Dziedzicka, Dr. Hirokazu Akiyama, and other colleagues from various other labs whom I have been lucky enough to be around over the course of my graduate training. Being in the company of a group of such high caliber has always motivated me to strive to be a better scientist. In addition, as I have progressed through this project, I have made what I hope are lifelong friends. Finally, I would like to thank my family – who have encouraged and supported me in ways that are far too numerous to list. My mother, Kumudini; my aunt, Anita; my sister, Priyanka – thank you all so very much. iv Table of Contents Contents Acknowledgments.......................................................................................................................... iv Table of Contents .............................................................................................................................v List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. xi List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... xii List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................................. xvii Chapter 1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Why study fate patterning during embryogenesis? ..............................................................1 1.1.1 Self-organization in embryogenesis .........................................................................1 1.1.2 A fundamental question ...........................................................................................1 1.1.3 Applications in regenerative medicine.....................................................................2 1.2 Signaling pathways in development ....................................................................................2 1.2.1 TGF-beta pathway ...................................................................................................3 1.2.1.1 BMPs and Nodals ......................................................................................3 1.2.1.2 Signaling via SMAD family ......................................................................4 1.2.1.3 Extracellular inhibitors of BMP and Nodal signaling ...............................5 1.2.2 Wnt pathway ............................................................................................................7 1.2.3 FGF pathway ............................................................................................................8 1.3 Brief introduction of early mammalian development ..........................................................9 1.3.1 Pre-implantation development in mice and humans ................................................9 1.3.2 Post-implantation embryonic development ...........................................................11 1.3.2.1 Gastrulation .............................................................................................14 1.3.2.2 Fate patterning in ectoderm / getting set for Neurulation ........................15 v 1.3.2.3 Markers of gastrulation and pre-neurulation ...........................................17 1.4 Mechanisms of Developmental fate patterning .................................................................18 1.4.1 Reaction-Diffusion .................................................................................................18 1.4.2 Positional-Information ...........................................................................................20 1.5 Bioengineering technologies to control cellular environments .........................................22 1.6 In vitro models of early mammalian development ............................................................26 1.6.1 Mouse .....................................................................................................................27 1.6.2 Human ....................................................................................................................29 1.7 Thesis motivation, hypothesis, and approach
Recommended publications
  • AIRE Is a Critical Spindle-Associated Protein in Embryonic Stem Cells Bin Gu1, Jean-Philippe Lambert2, Katie Cockburn1, Anne-Claude Gingras2,3, Janet Rossant1,3*
    RESEARCH ARTICLE AIRE is a critical spindle-associated protein in embryonic stem cells Bin Gu1, Jean-Philippe Lambert2, Katie Cockburn1, Anne-Claude Gingras2,3, Janet Rossant1,3* 1Program in Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada; 2Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute at Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada; 3Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada Abstract Embryonic stem (ES) cells go though embryo-like cell cycles regulated by specialized molecular mechanisms. However, it is not known whether there are ES cell-specific mechanisms regulating mitotic fidelity. Here we showed that Autoimmune Regulator (Aire), a transcription coordinator involved in immune tolerance processes, is a critical spindle-associated protein in mouse ES(mES) cells. BioID analysis showed that AIRE associates with spindle-associated proteins in mES cells. Loss of function analysis revealed that Aire was important for centrosome number regulation and spindle pole integrity specifically in mES cells. We also identified the c-terminal LESLL motif as a critical motif for AIRE’s mitotic function. Combined maternal and zygotic knockout further revealed Aire’s critical functions for spindle assembly in preimplantation embryos. These results uncovered a previously unappreciated function for Aire and provide new insights into the biology of stem cell proliferation and potential new angles to understand fertility defects in humans carrying Aire mutations. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.28131.001 *For correspondence: janet. [email protected] Introduction Competing interests: The Self-renewal capability, defined as the ability of cells to proliferate while sustaining differentiation authors declare that no potential, is one of the defining features of stem cells (Martello and Smith, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Beacon in Developmental Biology
    NEWS Beacon in developmental biology n Cite as: CMAJ 2017 October 16;189:E1298-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5460 Posted on cmajnews.com on September 27, 2017. he identification of Gurdon, whom some people the genes responsi- may know recently received ble for controlling the Nobel Prize for his work Tcellular fate and embryonic cloning frogs; undertaking development in mice has research that demonstrates made Dr. Janet Rossant a that all of development is beacon in the field of written in our genes, and all developmental biology. of our cells contain DNA that Her work pioneered tech- has that information, yet niques that allowed genes somehow during develop- to be altered within ment, different genes are embryos. It also acceler- turned on and differentiation ated avenues in the fields occurs. That’s what really of stem cell biology and turned me on to the underly- regenerative medicine. ing problem of ‘how do we She was awarded the get from a fertilized egg to an 2015 Canada Gairdner organism?’ John is the per- Wightman Award, pre- son who really turned me on sented annually to a Cana- to that question and he has dian who has demon- been pursuing it ever since strated outstanding and so have I.” leadership in medicine and medical science. Rossant For the diverse audience was recognized “for her who read CMAJ, can you outstanding contributions explain what stem cells to developmental biology are? and for her exceptional “Stem cells are cells that international leadership in have the ability to self- stem cell biology and pol- renew, make endless copies icy-making, and in advanc- of themselves and yet also ing research programs for retain the potential to differ- children’s illnesses.” Courtesy of Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Fy 2018 Human Frontier Science Program Organization
    APRIL 2017 APRIL 2018 — MARCH 2019 ANNUAL REPORT FY 2018 HUMAN FRONTIER SCIENCE PROGRAM ORGANIZATION The Human Frontier Science Program Organization (HFSPO) is unique, supporting international collaboration to undertake innovative, risky, basic research at the frontier of the life sciences. Special emphasis is given to the support and training of independent young investigators, beginning at the postdoctoral level. The Program is implemented by an international organisation, supported financially by Australia, Canada, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, the Republic of Korea, New Zealand, Norway, Singapore, Switzerland, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Nothern Ireland, the United States of America, and the European Commission. Since 1990, over 7000 researchers from more than 70 countries have been supported. Of these, 28 HFSP awardees have gone on to receive the Nobel Prize. 2 The following documents are available on the HFSP website www.hfsp.org: Joint Communiqués (Tokyo 1992, Washington 1997, Berlin 2002, Bern 2004, Ottawa 2007, Canberra 2010, Brussels 2013, London 2016): https://www.hfsp.org/about/governance/membership Statutes of the International Human Frontier Science Program Organization: https://www.hfsp.org/about/governance/hfspo-statutes Guidelines for the participation of new members in HFSPO: https://www.hfsp.org/about/governance/membership General reviews of the HFSP (1996, 2001, 2006-2007, 2010, 2018): https://www.hfsp.org/about/strategy/reviews Updated and previous lists of awards, including titles and abstracts:
    [Show full text]
  • Balancing Potency and Differentiation in Mouse Embryo-Derived Stem Cells and in Vivo
    Balancing potency and differentiation in mouse embryo-derived stem cells and in vivo By Anne Christine Helness A thesis submitted to Imperial College London for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Surgery and Oncology Imperial College London September 2011 1 Abstract An inherent challenge for developing organisms is to maintain a critical balance between cell potency and differentiation. This is most obvious in embryonic stem (ES) cells where genetic, epigenetic and cell signalling pathways support ES cell ability to self-renew and to generate all embryonic lineages. Recently, a series of reports revealed how Polycomb-mediated repression might buffer the precocious expression of somatic lineage regulators in ES cells. Notably, these genes carry bivalent chromatin enriched in both repressive (H3K27me3) and permissive (H3K4me2) histone marks. They are targeted by the Polycomb repressive complexes PRC1 (Ring1B) and PRC2, which mediates H3K27me3 and assemble poised RNA polymerase II (RNAP II), conferring silencing of loci primed for future activation (or repression) upon ES cell differentiation. During early development the transition from morula to blastocyst is the starting point for lineage segregation into the inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm (TE). ES cells are derived from the ICM and are pluripotent. By contrast, TE-derived trophoblast stem (TS) cells are multipotent and contribute solely to placenta formation in vivo. To address whether ES cells epigenetic features are unique attributes of pluripotent cells in the early embryo, we compared the epigenetic status of key developmental genes in blastocyst-derived stem cells and in vivo. We provide direct evidence that bivalent histone markings operate in vivo from the eight-cell up to the blastocyst stage.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulation of Morphogen and Tissue Dynamics
    Simulation of morphogen and tissue dynamics M. D. Peters, L. D. Wittwer, A. Stopka, D. Barac, C. Lang, D. Iber Abstract Morphogenesis, the process by which an adult organism emerges from a single cell, has fascinated humans for a long time. Modelling this process can provide novel insights into development and the principles that orchestrate the developmental processes. This chapter focusses on the mathematical description and numerical simulation of developmental processes. In particular, we discuss the mathematical representation of morphogen and tissue dynamics on static and grow- ing domains, as well as the corresponding tissue mechanics. In addition, we give an overview of numerical methods that are routinely used to solve the resulting systems of partial differential equations. These include the finite element method and the Lattice Boltzmann method for the discretisation as well as the arbitrary Lagrangian- Eulerian method and the Diffuse-Domain method to numerically treat deforming domains. 1 Introduction During morphogenesis, the coordination of the processes that control size, shape, and pattern is essential to achieve stereotypic outcomes and comprehensive func- tionality of the developing organism. There are two main components contributing to the precisely orchestrated process of morphogenesis: morphogen dynamics and tissue dynamics. While signalling networks control cellular behaviour, such as pro- liferation and differentiation, tissue dynamics in turn modulate diffusion, advection and dilution, and affect the position of morphogen sources and sinks. Due to this interconnection, the regulation of those processes is very complex. Although a large arXiv:1806.04138v1 [q-bio.TO] 11 Jun 2018 amount of experimental data is available today, many of the underlying regulatory mechanisms are still unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • EMBO Encounters Issue43.Pdf
    WINTER 2019/2020 ISSUE 43 Nine group leaders selected Meet the first EMBO Global Investigators PAGE 6 Accelerating scientific publishing EMBO publishing costs Review Commons Making our journals’ platform announced finances public PAGE 3 PAGES 10 – 11 Welcome, Young Investigators! Contract replaces stipend Marking ten years 27 group leaders join the programme EMBO Postdoctoral Fellowships EMBO Molecular Medicine receive an update celebrates anniversary PAGES 4 – 5 PAGE 7 PAGE 13 www.embo.org TABLE OF CONTENTS EMBO NEWS EMBO news Review Commons: accelerating publishing Page 3 EMBO Molecular Medicine turns ten © Marietta Schupp, EMBL Photolab Marietta Schupp, © Page 13 Editorial MBO was founded by scientists for Introducing 27 new Young Investigators scientists. This philosophy remains at Pages 4-5 Ethe heart of our organization until today. EMBO Members are vital in the running of our Meet the first EMBO Global programmes and activities: they screen appli- Accelerating scientific publishing 17 journals on board Investigators cations, interview candidates, decide on fund- Review Commons will manage the transfer of ing, and provide strategic direction. On pages EMBO and ASAPbio announced pre-journal portable review platform the manuscript, reviews, and responses to affili- Page 6 8-9 four members describe why they chose to ate journals. A consortium of seventeen journals New members meet in Heidelberg dedicate their time to an EMBO Committee across six publishers (see box) have joined the Fellowships: from stipends to contracts Pages 14 – 15 and what they took away from the experience. n December 2019, EMBO, in partnership with decide to submit their work to a journal, it will project by committing to use the Review Commons Page 7 When EMBO was created, the focus lay ASAPbio, launched Review Commons, a multi- allow editors to make efficient editorial decisions referee reports for their independent editorial deci- specifically on fostering cross-border inter- Ipublisher partnership which aims to stream- based on existing referee comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Janet Rossant ANDREW F. HOLMES DEAN of MEDICINE DISTINCTION LECTURES
    Dr. Janet Rossant ANDREW F. HOLMES DEAN OF MEDICINE DISTINCTION LECTURES Dr. Janet Rossant, PhD, FRS, FRSC Chief of Research, SickKids Senior Scientist, Developmental & Stem Cell Biology, SickKids Lombard Insurance Chair in Pediatric Research University Professor, Department of Molecular Genetics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto Title Stem cells and early lineage development When Friday, October 18, 2013 11:30 a.m. – 1:00 p.m. Where CP Leblond Amphitheatre Strathcona Anatomy and Dentistry Building 3640 rue University Montreal, QC H3G 1Y6 Dr. Janet Rossant, SickKids Chief of Research and a world-renowned expert in developmental biology, is the definition of a trailblazer. Widely known for her studies of the genes that control embryonic development in the mouse, Dr. Rossant has pioneered techniques for following cell fate and altering genes in embryos. This work continues to resonate in medical genetic research. Her current research focuses on stem cell development and cell differentiation in the developing embryo, important areas for the study of birth defects as well as regenerative medicine. Firmly planted on the front lines of technological change, Dr. Rossant has established SickKids as a global forerunner in genetic research. Janet Rossant was born in Chatham, UK, and trained at the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, United Kingdom. In 1977, Dr. Rossant moved to Canada and joined the faculty at Brock University. From 1985 to 2005, she was a leading researcher at the Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto. She joined SickKids in 2005 and became Chief of Research of the Research Institute. She is also a University Professor at the University of Toronto.
    [Show full text]
  • Medea Sumoylation Restricts the Signaling Range of the Dpp Morphogen in the Drosophila Embryo
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 23, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Medea SUMOylation restricts the signaling range of the Dpp morphogen in the Drosophila embryo Wayne O. Miles,1 Ellis Jaffray,2 Susan G. Campbell,1 Shugaku Takeda,1,4 Laura J. Bayston,1 Sanjay P. Basu,1 Mingfa Li,3,5 Laurel A. Raftery,3 Mark P. Ashe,1 Ronald T. Hay,2 and Hilary L. Ashe1,6 1Faculty of Life Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, United Kingdom; 2School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, United Kingdom; 3Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts 02109, USA Morphogens are secreted signaling molecules that form concentration gradients and control cell fate in developing tissues. During development, it is essential that morphogen range is strictly regulated in order for correct cell type specification to occur. One of the best characterized morphogens is Drosophila Decapentaplegic (Dpp), a BMP signaling molecule that patterns the dorsal ectoderm of the embryo by activating the Mad and Medea (Med) transcription factors. We demonstrate that there is a spatial and temporal expansion of the expression patterns of Dpp target genes in SUMO pathway mutant embryos. We identify Med as the primary SUMOylation target in the Dpp pathway, and show that failure to SUMOylate Med leads to the increased Dpp signaling range observed in the SUMO pathway mutant embryos. Med is SUMO modified in the nucleus, and we provide evidence that SUMOylation triggers Med nuclear export. Hence, Med SUMOylation provides a mechanism by which nuclei can continue to monitor the presence of extracellular Dpp signal to activate target gene expression for an appropriate duration.
    [Show full text]
  • Web Conference with Dr. Janet Rossant
    Web Conference with Dr. Janet Rossant - 00:00 Thank you for taking the time to speak with us, so obviously we'd like to ask you some questions about your work and your research, but can you tell us about yourself and your research, how you got into stem cells in the first place? - 00:16 Okay, so I've been interested in early development for a very long time, sort of all my research career. I started as a graduate student at the University of Cambridge with Richard Gardner who was one of the first people who developed techniques to inject cells into blastocysts to make chimeras, and so I was always interested in how an egg develops into a complex organism, and over the years I've worked on the cell lineage in the early embryo. We've then been able to move in and identify some of the genes and pathways that specifies cell fate in the early embryo, and of course along the way, stem cells come into the picture because it's from the early mammalian embryo, the blastocysts, that you can derive embryonic stem cells, and it's really the work that I and my colleagues did early on in the embryo showing that there was a subset of cells that were pluripotent that gave people the idea that maybe you could capture that pluripotency and derive permanent cell lines from those cells and grow them in cultures. So we've worked on mouse embryonic stem cells, but we also have been able to show that we can derive stem cells from the other two types of the blastocysts, the trophoblast and the primitive endoderm, so in the mouse you can have three stem cell lines from the blastocysts, each of which replicates the properties of those lineages in vivo.
    [Show full text]
  • Pnas11052ackreviewers 5098..5136
    Acknowledgment of Reviewers, 2013 The PNAS editors would like to thank all the individuals who dedicated their considerable time and expertise to the journal by serving as reviewers in 2013. Their generous contribution is deeply appreciated. A Harald Ade Takaaki Akaike Heather Allen Ariel Amir Scott Aaronson Karen Adelman Katerina Akassoglou Icarus Allen Ido Amit Stuart Aaronson Zach Adelman Arne Akbar John Allen Angelika Amon Adam Abate Pia Adelroth Erol Akcay Karen Allen Hubert Amrein Abul Abbas David Adelson Mark Akeson Lisa Allen Serge Amselem Tarek Abbas Alan Aderem Anna Akhmanova Nicola Allen Derk Amsen Jonathan Abbatt Neil Adger Shizuo Akira Paul Allen Esther Amstad Shahal Abbo Noam Adir Ramesh Akkina Philip Allen I. Jonathan Amster Patrick Abbot Jess Adkins Klaus Aktories Toby Allen Ronald Amundson Albert Abbott Elizabeth Adkins-Regan Muhammad Alam James Allison Katrin Amunts Geoff Abbott Roee Admon Eric Alani Mead Allison Myron Amusia Larry Abbott Walter Adriani Pietro Alano Isabel Allona Gynheung An Nicholas Abbott Ruedi Aebersold Cedric Alaux Robin Allshire Zhiqiang An Rasha Abdel Rahman Ueli Aebi Maher Alayyoubi Abigail Allwood Ranjit Anand Zalfa Abdel-Malek Martin Aeschlimann Richard Alba Julian Allwood Beau Ances Minori Abe Ruslan Afasizhev Salim Al-Babili Eric Alm David Andelman Kathryn Abel Markus Affolter Salvatore Albani Benjamin Alman John Anderies Asa Abeliovich Dritan Agalliu Silas Alben Steven Almo Gregor Anderluh John Aber David Agard Mark Alber Douglas Almond Bogi Andersen Geoff Abers Aneel Aggarwal Reka Albert Genevieve Almouzni George Andersen Rohan Abeyaratne Anurag Agrawal R. Craig Albertson Noga Alon Gregers Andersen Susan Abmayr Arun Agrawal Roy Alcalay Uri Alon Ken Andersen Ehab Abouheif Paul Agris Antonio Alcami Claudio Alonso Olaf Andersen Soman Abraham H.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting the Measure of Positional Information Johannes Jaeger, Alfonso Martinez-Arias
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by PubMed Central Primer Getting the Measure of Positional Information Johannes Jaeger, Alfonso Martinez-Arias Of Fruit Flies and French Flags detection of concentration thresholds by cells in the target Understanding the mechanisms that underlie pattern tissue [9]. Early efforts to model the system indicated formation is one of the major challenges of developmental that target gene auto-activation [11], or more complex biology. The complexity and beauty of the patterns on interactions among downstream factors [12,13], would be butterfly wings, fish scales, or bird feathers are not only necessary to achieve the required robustness. However, remarkable products of developmental processes but these studies were hampered by the absence of reliable puzzles that tease our intellects. If we are to understand experimental evidence on the variability of gene expression these beautiful products of cellular activity, we need to against which the models could be tested. first investigate simpler patterns, which are more tractable Quantification at Last! experimentally. A good example is the subdivision of an embryo along its main axis, which can be represented as a Developmental biology is changing. Qualitative, descriptive polarized subdivision of a cellular field. Over 40 years ago, approaches are beginning to yield to quantitative, analytical Lewis Wolpert offered a conceptual solution to this problem ones, through the development of optical and analytical in the form of the French Flag model [1]. The central element techniques. These approaches allow us to state more precise of the proposal is that spatial gradients of substances called hypotheses (formulated as predictive models), which morphogens are the cause of such subdivision (Figure 1, left can be tested more rigorously.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Small Molecules for Neuroectoderm Differentiation & Patterning Using Factorial Experimental Design
    Evaluation of Small Molecules for Neuroectoderm differentiation & patterning using Factorial Experimental Design Master Thesis in Applied Physics For the degree of Master of Science in Biotechnology DIMITRIOS VOULGARIS Department of Physics, Division of Biological Physics CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Göteborg, Sweden 2016 Master thesis in Applied Physics Evaluation of Small Molecules for Neuroectoderm differentiation and patterning using Factorial Experimental Design Dimitrios Voulgaris Department of Physics Division of Biological Physics CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Göteborg, Sweden 2016 Evaluation of Small Molecules for Neuroectoderm differentiation and patterning using Factorial Experimental Design DIMITRIOS VOULGARIS © DIMITRIOS VOULGARIS, 2016 Supervisor: Anders Lundin, Industrial PhD candidate, Astra Zeneca and Karolinska Institutet Examiner: Julie Gold, Associate Professor, Division of Biological Physics, Department of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology Master thesis for the degree of M.Sc. in Biotechnology Division of Biological Physics Department of Physics Chalmers University of Technology SE-142 96 Göteborg Sweden Telephone +46 (0)31-722 1000 Cover: hiPSCs differentiated for 4 days on LN-521 in neural induction N2B27 medium stained with DAPI (blue) and the intermediate filament Nestin (green). Printed by Chalmers Reproservice Göteborg, Sweden 2016 Evaluation of Small Molecules for Neuroectoderm differentiation and patterning using Factorial Experimental Design DIMITRIOS VOULGARIS Department of Physics Chalmers University of Technology Evaluation of Small Molecules for Neuroectoderm differentiation and patterning using Factorial Experimental Design DIMITRIOS VOULGARIS Department of Physics Chalmers University of Technology ABSTRACT Screening for therapeutic compounds and treatments for diseases of the Brain does not only encompass the successful generation of iPS-derived homogenous neural stem cell populations but also the capacity of the differentiation protocol to derive on-demand region-specific cells.
    [Show full text]