DOCSLIB.ORG

Aronia Arbutifolia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aronia Arbutifolia Aronia arbutifolia - Red Chokeberry (Rosaceae) Aronia melanocarpa - Black Chokeberry (Rosaceae) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Aronia arbutifolia and Aronia melanocarpa are USAGE deciduous shrubs known for shiny green summer and red Function autumn foliage. Chokeberries have colorful, pendulous -mass plantings, borders, informal hedges, or low screens fruits, are very adaptable to moist/wet sites, and are -good near bodies of water appropriate for naturalizing and for attracting wildlife. Texture -fine texture in foliage and when bare FEATURES -thick density in foliage and when bare (when young), Form but open density in foliage and when bare (when mature, -small shrubs; to 5' tall x 4' wide (A. m.) or due to arching habit) to 8' tall x 4' wide (A. a.) Asset -multi-stemmed and spreading due to -wet site tolerant suckering -red or black, persistent fruits, depending on species -upright columnar when young, becoming arching vase- Liabilities shaped with age -suckering can be either desired or detrimental -medium growth rate Habitat Culture -Zones 3 to 9 -full sun to partial shade -Native to Eastern North America, Nova Scotia to -tolerant of poor soils and moisture (wet or dry) but Florida, west to Michigan. prefers rich, moist, well-drained, slightly acid soil -takes well to pruning SELECTIONS -generally stress tolerant Alternates -abundantly available in B&B or container -good-foliaged small shrubs with erect to arching multi- Foliage stemmed habit -dark green; deciduous -small shrubs with attractive and sometimes persistent -alternate arrangement; obovate; finely serrated; shiny fruits (Amelanchier, Viburnum trilobum) and glabrous above -autumn color - green to orange to wine-red, with all Cultivars – Variants- Related species three colors on the same shrub at the same time; Oct.; -A. arbutifolia - Red Chokeberry - is grown for its autumn color can be spectacular excellent red autumn color and profuse production of red Flowers fruits. This slow growing, suckering shrub transplants -white; May; 1" well. The 0.25" fruits are borne along the stem and diameter although highly ornamental are not eaten by birds. The inflorescences; white flowers precede the fruit but are not as ornamental. attractive but not The leaves turn bright red in the autumn. Red overwhelming Chokeberry will adapt to wet or dry soils. Fruits Cultivars: -small black or red -'Brilliantissima' - flowers and fruits are more abundant; fruits in pendulous striking persistent red fruits and flaming red autumn clusters; black color, both of which show up better in the landscape than fruits not effective Black Chokeberry; to 6-8' tall. unless viewed up- -'Erecta' - an upright cultivar reaching 7' x 4'. close or against a white background, -A. melanocarpa - Black Chokeberry - a suckering, but red fruits are thicket-forming shrub that adapts to wet or dry sites. The dazzling glossy foliage turns red in the autumn and is displayed -Oct. and winter with the purplish-black fruit. The plant can be used in persistent naturalistic plantings in sun or shade. -common name Cultivars and Varieties: comes from bitter taste of the fruits -'Autumn Magic' - bright red autumn foliage color. Twigs -A. m. var. elata (sometimes listed as 'Elata' ) - Glossy -brown-red; with striking bright red conical buds Black Chokeberry - A compact rounded shrub with white partially curling around the stem; lateral buds the same flowers. The black fruits persist well into winter. The size as terminal buds; stems numerous and upright variety is better than the straight species in its quality of foliage, flowers, and fruits - Iroquois Beauty™ ('Morton') - A dwarf about 3' tall. -'Viking' - A 4-6' shrub with glossy deep green foliage that turns red in the autumn. The plant also produces large black fruits. Trunk -not applicable .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Maleae (Rosaceae) Based on Multiple Chloroplast Regions: Implications to Genera Circumscription
    Hindawi BioMed Research International Volume 2018, Article ID 7627191, 10 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7627191 Research Article Phylogeny of Maleae (Rosaceae) Based on Multiple Chloroplast Regions: Implications to Genera Circumscription Jiahui Sun ,1,2 Shuo Shi ,1,2,3 Jinlu Li,1,4 Jing Yu,1 Ling Wang,4 Xueying Yang,5 Ling Guo ,6 and Shiliang Zhou 1,2 1 State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China 2University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100043, China 3College of Life Science, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China 4Te Department of Landscape Architecture, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China 5Key Laboratory of Forensic Genetics, Institute of Forensic Science, Ministry of Public Security, Beijing 100038, China 6Beijing Botanical Garden, Beijing 100093, China Correspondence should be addressed to Ling Guo; [email protected] and Shiliang Zhou; [email protected] Received 21 September 2017; Revised 11 December 2017; Accepted 2 January 2018; Published 19 March 2018 Academic Editor: Fengjie Sun Copyright © 2018 Jiahui Sun et al. Tis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Maleae consists of economically and ecologically important plants. However, there are considerable disputes on generic circumscription due to the lack of a reliable phylogeny at generic level. In this study, molecular phylogeny of 35 generally accepted genera in Maleae is established using 15 chloroplast regions. Gillenia isthemostbasalcladeofMaleae,followedbyKageneckia + Lindleya, Vauquelinia, and a typical radiation clade, the core Maleae, suggesting that the proposal of four subtribes is reasonable.
    [Show full text]
  • The Natural Communities of South Carolina
    THE NATURAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTH CAROLINA BY JOHN B. NELSON SOUTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE & MARINE RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FEBRUARY 1986 INTRODUCTION The maintenance of an accurate inventory of a region's natural resources must involve a system for classifying its natural communities. These communities themselves represent identifiable units which, like individual plant and animal species of concern, contribute to the overall natural diversity characterizing a given region. This classification has developed from a need to define more accurately the range of natural habitats within South Carolina. From the standpoint of the South Carolina Nongame and Heritage Trust Program, the conceptual range of natural diversity in the state does indeed depend on knowledge of individual community types. Additionally, it is recognized that the various plant and animal species of concern (which make up a significant remainder of our state's natural diversity) are often restricted to single natural communities or to a number of separate, related ones. In some cases, the occurrence of a given natural community allows us to predict, with some confidence, the presence of specialized or endemic resident species. It follows that a reasonable and convenient method of handling the diversity of species within South Carolina is through the concept of these species as residents of a range of natural communities. Ideally, a nationwide classification system could be developed and then used by all the states. Since adjacent states usually share a number of community types, and yet may each harbor some that are unique, any classification scheme on a national scale would be forced to recognize the variation in a given community from state to state (or region to region) and at the same time to maintain unique communities as distinctive.
    [Show full text]
  • Gether with a Significant Increase in the Lag Phase Preceding Plasma Lipid Oxidation [4]
    Journal of Berry Research 6 (2016) 159–173 159 DOI:10.3233/JBR-160127 IOS Press Multi-radical (ORACMR5) antioxidant capacity of selected berries and effects of food processing R.L. Priora,∗, M. Sintarab and T. Changb aDepartment of Food Science, University of Arkansas, Searcy, AR, USA bInternational Chemical Testing, Milford, MA, USA Received 30 December 2015; accepted 12 March 2016 Abstract. BACKGROUND: Fruits and berries are known to contain relatively high amounts of antioxidant/bioactive compounds. Several methods have been used for measurement of antioxidant capacity (AC), but not all methods have direct relevance to in vivo antioxidant status. OBJECTIVE: Determine AC in berry/fruit samples, processed berry products, and purified compounds by utilizing 5 different biologically relevant free radical/oxidant sources. METHODS: Samples were assayed for AC capacity using 5 different free radical/oxidant sources: peroxyl radical (ORAC), hydroxyl radical (HORAC), peroxynitrite (NORAC), superoxide anion (SORAC) and singlet oxygen (SOAC)]. Total AC (sum of AC with 5 individual radicals) was expressed as Oxygen Radical Absorption Capacity using Multiple Radicals (ORACMR5). RESULTS: SOAC contributed more than 60% of ORACMR5 in blackberries, sweet and tart cherries; and no detectable levels of SOAC were found in strawberries, black currants and raspberries. Whole fruit purees of mango, wild blueberry and cherry contained 95, 85 and 67% respectively of total ORACMR5 from SOAC. However, freeze dried wild blueberry powder from same production season had only 28% as SOAC and 42 and 22% as ORAC and HORAC. Blueberry/Pomegranate and Mango/Pineapple smoothies had 67% and 77% of ORACMR5 as SOAC. CONCLUSIONS: The antioxidant quenching potential using 5 different radical/oxidant sources of different berries and fruits varied widely and understanding this variation may be helpful in understanding health benefits of different berries and foods.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL REPORT Regenerating Longleaf Pine on Hydric Soils: Short- and Long-Term Effects on Native Ground-Layer Vegetation
    FINAL REPORT Regenerating Longleaf Pine on Hydric Soils: Short- and Long-term Effects on Native Ground-Layer Vegetation SERDP Project SI-1303 June 16, 2009 Joan L. Walker U.S. Forest Service Southern Research Station Susan Cohen U.S. Forest Service Southern Research Station Distribution Statement A:Approved for Public Release, Distribution is Unlimited This report was prepared under contract to the Department of Defense Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP). The publication of this report does not indicate endorsement by the Department of Defense, nor should the contents be construed as reflecting the official policy or position of the Department of Defense. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the Department of Defense. SI -1303 Regenerating Longleaf Pine on Hydric Soils: Short- and Long-term Effects on Native Ground-Layer Vegetation Final Report Principal Performers Joan L. Walker U.S. Forest Service Southern Research Station, Clemson, SC Susan Cohen U.S. Forest Service Southern Research Station, RTP, NC Prepared by Joan L. Walker, US Forest Service, Research Plant Ecologist Benjamin O. Knapp, Clemson University, Research Assistant April 22, 2009 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ACRONYMS ..................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................v
    [Show full text]
  • The Structure and Composition of Vegetation in the Lake-Fill Peatlands of Indiana
    2001. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 1 10:51-78 THE STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION OF VEGETATION IN THE LAKE-FILL PEATLANDS OF INDIANA Anthony L. Swinehart 1 and George R. Parker: Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907 Daniel E. Wujek: Department of Biology, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan 48859 ABSTRACT. The vegetation of 16 lake-fill peatlands in northern Indiana was systematically sampled. Peatland types included fens, tall shrub bogs, leatherleaf bogs and forested peatlands. No significant difference in species richness among the four peatland types was identified from the systematic sampling. Vegetation composition and structure, along with water chemistry variables, was analyzed using multi- variate statistical analysis. Alkalinity and woody plant cover accounted for much of the variability in the herbaceous and ground layers of the peatlands, and a successional gradient separating the peatlands was evident. A multivariate statistical comparison of leatherleaf bogs from Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, New York, New Jersey and New Hampshire was made on the basis of vegetation composition and frequency and five climatic variables. The vascular vegetation communities of Indiana peatlands and other peatlands in the southern Great Lakes region are distinct from those in the northeastern U.S., Ohio and the northern Great Lakes. Some of these distinctions are attributed to climatic factors, while others are related to biogeo- graphic history of the respective regions. Keywords: Peatlands, leatherleaf bogs, fens, ecological succession, phytogeography Within midwestern North America, the such as Chamaedaphne calyculata, Androm- northern counties of Illinois, Indiana and Ohio eda glaucophylla, and Carex oligospermia of- 1 represent the southern extent of peatland com- ten make "southern outlier peatlands ' con- munities containing characteristic plant spe- spicuous to botanists, studies of such cies of northern or boreal affinity.
    [Show full text]
  • Mysterious Chokeberries: New Data on the Diversity and Phylogeny of Aronia Medik. (Rosaceae)
    European Journal of Taxonomy 570: 1–14 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2019.570 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2019 · Shipunov A. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Research article Mysterious chokeberries: new data on the diversity and phylogeny of Aronia Medik. (Rosaceae) Alexey SHIPUNOV 1,*, Sofia GLADKOVA 2, Polina TIMOSHINA 3, Hye Ji LEE 4, Jinhee CHOI 5, Sarah DESPIEGELAERE 5 & Bryan CONNOLLY 5 1,4,5,6 Minot State University, Biology, 500 University Ave, Minot, ND, USA. 2,3 Department of Biology, Moscow State University, Russia. 7 Framingham State University, Biology, 100 State St, Framingham, MA, USA. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 3 Email: [email protected] 4 Email: [email protected] 5 Email: [email protected] 6 Email: [email protected] 7 Email: [email protected] Abstract. Aronia Medik. (chokeberry, Rosaceae) is a genus of woody shrubs with two or three North American species. Species boundaries and relationships between species of Aronia are frequently under question. The only European species in the genus, A. mitschurinii A.K.Skvortsov & Maitul., is suggested to be an inter-generic hybrid. In order to clarify the relationships between species of Aronia, we performed several morphometric and molecular analyses and found that the molecular and morphological diversity within data on American Aronia is low, and species boundaries are mostly not clearly expressed. Whereas morphology is able to separate American species from A. mitschurinii, there is no support for such discrimination from the molecular data; our analyses did not reveal evidence of A.
    [Show full text]
  • Aronia Melanocarpa)In Risk of Water Deficit for Subsequent Plantings
    JOBNAME: horts 43#2 2008 PAGE: 1 OUTPUT: February 13 20:52:49 2008 tsp/horts/158649/02625 HORTSCIENCE 43(2):494–499. 2008. Vestberg et al., 1999). However, small fruit production on cut-over peatlands can be challenging. Intensive drainage required dur- Growing Black Chokeberry ing peat harvesting results in a deep and unstable water table level that represents a (Aronia melanocarpa)in risk of water deficit for subsequent plantings. The water table level may periodically re- Cut-over Peatlands main high as a result of the low hydraulic conductivity of peat with associated risk Julie Bussie`res, Ste´phanie Boudreau, Guillaume Cle´ment–Mathieu, of anoxia in the root zone. Moreover, the Blanche Dansereau, and Line Rochefort1 remaining peat has a low thermal conductiv- De´partement de Phytologie, Universite´ Laval, Que´bec, QC, G1V 0A6, ity, is highly acidic, and has a low nutritional content (Myllis, 1996; Wind-Mulder et al., Canada 1996). Hence, fertilization is required for Additional index words. bog, peat, rehabilitation, reclamation, small fruit, northern berries plant growth and productive fruit yield in cut-over peatlands (Noormets et al., 2004; Abstract. This project was established to evaluate the feasibility of black chokeberry Paal and Paal, 2002). [Aronia melanocarpa (Michx.) Ell.] culture on Canadian cut-over peatlands and to define The objectives of this project were to its appropriate production practices. We tested the effects of different fertilizer rates, evaluate the feasibility of black chokeberry application methods, and mulches on the vegetative development and berry production (Aronia melanocarpa) culture on Canadian of seedlings over a 6-year period (2000 to 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Berry and Small Fruit Varieties and Markets in Montana
    Berry production in Montana: varieties and markets Dr. Zach Miller-Assistant Professor & Director at MSU-Western Ag. Research Center, Dr. Mac Burgess, Dr. Heather Estrada, Bridgid Jarrett, Durc Setzer MT Berry Growers’ Workshop , April 2019 Outline •Western Agricultural Research Center (WARC) • History • Mission •Goals, opportunities, and challenges for commercial fruit production •Examples of what MSU-WARC does to help • Berry results • Also Apples, Grapes, and More MSU-Western ARC •Corvallis, Montana •Excellent Growing Conditions • Zone 5a • >120 Frost Free Days • ~2000 Growing Degree Days •Irrigated: • 11 Inches of Precipitation/Year •Established in 1907 during a Bitterroot Apple Boom •Major production region • 10-15,000 ac • 750,000 trees Mission-Specialty Crops Goal Growing Fruit for Profit Opportunities: Challenges: •Growing demand •Marketing/Market access •High value per acre •High start-up and labor costs •Slow return on investment •Adapted cultivars •New and untested cultivars •Favorable climates •Variable climates •Steep learning curve- less forgiving, more risk than annual crops Growing Demand: Local Food (and Drinks) •Supporting local-grown and sustainable practices •Interest in eating healthy •#2 in microbreweries per capita Growing Demand: Agrotourism Synergizing the two largest segments of the states economy: •in 2016: •$4.3 billion in ag. production •$3.0 billion from tourism •12.4 million visitors • MT economic development report 2017 http://aeromt.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Agritourism-Manual.pdf Marketing/Market
    [Show full text]
  • Variability of Characteristic Components of Aronia
    Czech J. Food Sci. Vol. 32, 2014, No. 1: 25–30 Variability of Characteristic Components of Aronia Jitka ŠNEBERGROVÁ, Helena ČÍŽKOVÁ, Eva NERADOVÁ, Bahtinur KAPCI, Aleš RAJCHL and Michal VOLDŘICH† Department of Food Preservation, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, Faculty of Food and Bichochemical Technology, Institute of Chemical Technology Prague, Prague, Czech Republic Abstract † Šnebergrová J., Čížková H., Neradová E., Kapci B., Rajchl A., Voldřich M. (2014): Variability of char- acteristic components of aronia. Czech J. Food Sci., 32: 25–30. The variability of characteristic components of aronia (Aronia melanocarpa, black chokeberry) and to evaluate the chemical composition and quality of aronia products in order to complete the already available data and to facilitate authentication of fruit products were estimated. The mean values obtained for the set of aronia fruits were: soluble solids 19.9 °Brix, titratable acidity 9.8 g malic acid/kg, formol number 11.9 ml 0.1M NaOH/100 g, ash 6.7 g/kg, phos- phorus 0.34 g/kg, potassium 2.90 g/kg, calcium 0.27 g/kg, magnesium 0.16 g/kg, sucrose 0.10 g/kg, glucose 47.1 g/kg, fructose 37.8 g/kg, sorbitol 66.1 g/kg, malic acid 9.6 g/kg, citric acid 1.0 g/kg, quinic acid 5.0 g/kg, isocitric acid 0.02 g/kg. These values can potentially be a useful tool to determine aronia content in foodstuffs or to determine adulteration of other fruit-based products with aronia. The most promising markers appeared to be the content of sorbitol, quinic acid and characteristic profile of anthocyanins measured by HPLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Aronia Berries – What's Their Potential?
    Aronia Berries – What’s Their Potential? By Jacqueline King, WSU – Mount Vernon Aronia (Aronia melanocarpa / Photinia melanocarpa), sometimes called black chokeberry, is a deciduous shrub native to eastern North America, used by landscapers primarily for its clusters of creamy white flowers in late spring, and colorful flame-colored autumn foliage contrasting with dark berries. The thick bushes grow to 6 to 8 feet in height, and are sometimes used as a windbreak in border plantings. Aronia requires a damp, acid soil with sufficient rain during the growing season. The pea-sized, violet-black berries are harvested in autumn. Berries have a strong, stable and natural color, with a dry and sour strong flavor. For those interested in a dual- purpose plant for edible landscaping, the recent introduction "Autumn Magic" from the University of British Columbia was selected for large fruit size, superior fall color and overall form. Aronia was well known to natives and early settlers, but has not been commercially cultivated in the U.S. since the turn of the century. However, in Denmark, eastern Europe and Russia (especially Siberia) the strongly colored, pungently flavored fruit is quite popular for juice and even wine production. Breeding programs there have produced fruiting clones that are highly productive, and amazingly uniform in berry size and quality. For the best fruit production, clones that have been selected for high yield should be chosen, rather than those intended for landscaping. Plants from these breeding lines, for example "Nero" and "Viking," are available from several specialist nurseries such as Raintree and One Green World.
    [Show full text]
  • Cherry Fire Blight
    ALABAMA A&M AND AUBURN UNIVERSITIES Fire Blight on Fruit Trees and Woody Ornamentals ANR-542 ire blight, caused by the bac- Fterium Erwinia amylovora, is a common and destructive dis- ease of pear, apple, quince, hawthorn, firethorn, cotoneaster, and mountain ash. Many other members of the rose plant family as well as several stone fruits are also susceptible to this disease (Table 1). The host range of the Spur blight on crabapple fire blight pathogen includes cv ‘Mary Potter’. nearly 130 plant species in 40 genera. Badly diseased trees and symptoms are often referred to shrubs are usually disfigured and as blossom blight. The blossom may even be killed by fire blight phase of fire blight affects blight. different host plants to different degrees. Fruit may be infected Symptoms by the bacterium directly through the skin or through the The term fire blight describes stem. Immature fruit are initially Severe fire blight on crabapple the blackened, burned appear- water-soaked, turning brownish- cv ‘Red Jade’. ance of damaged flowers, twigs, black and becoming mummified and foliage. Symptoms appear in as the disease progresses. These Shortly after the blossoms early spring. Blossoms first be- mummies often cling to the trees die, leaves on the same spur or come water-soaked, then wilt, for several months. shoot turn brown on apple and and finally turn brown. These most other hosts or black on Table 1. Plant Genera That Include Fire Blight Susceptible Cultivars. Common Name Scientific Name Common Name Scientific Name Apple, Crabapple Malus Jetbead Rhodotypos
    [Show full text]