DOCSLIB.ORG

Black Hills National Forest Travel Analysis Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Black Hills National Forest Travel Analysis Report BLACK HILLS NATIONAL FOREST FOREST-WIDE TRAVEL ANALYSIS REPORT September 2007 1019 North 5 th Street Custer, SD 57730-7239 Phone 605-673-9200 FAX 605-673-9350 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or familial status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotapes, etc.) should contact the USDA’s TARGET Center at 202/720-2600 (voice or TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14 th & Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call 202/720-5964 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity employer. TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................VII PROCESS ..............................................................................................................................VII PRODUCTS ............................................................................................................................VIII STEP 1: SETTING UP THE ANALYSIS....................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Objectives of the Analysis ................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Scale of the Analysis............................................................................................ 1-1 1.3 Interdisciplinary Team Members and Participants .............................................. 1-1 1.4 Identification of Information Sources.................................................................. 1-2 1.5 Status of Current Data.......................................................................................... 1-2 1.6 Analysis plan........................................................................................................ 1-3 STEP 2: DESCRIBING THE SITUATION ................................................................... 2-1 2.1 General Setting..................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Existing Transportation System........................................................................... 2-1 2.2.1 General Description ................................................................................. 2-1 2.2.2 Regional Connectivity ............................................................................. 2-3 2.2.3 Forest Roads.............................................................................................2-3 2.2.4 Forest Road Density................................................................................. 2-5 2.2.5 Forest Service Trails ................................................................................ 2-5 2.2.6 Travel Management Objectives and Standards........................................2-6 2.2.7 Use Patterns .............................................................................................2-8 2.2.8 National Forest System Roads and Trails Budget ...................................2-8 2.2.9 Scenic Byways......................................................................................... 2-8 2.3 Physical Environment.......................................................................................... 2-9 2.3.1 Geographic Features ................................................................................ 2-9 2.3.2 Climate.....................................................................................................2-9 2.3.3 Soil Conditions.......................................................................................2-10 2.3.4 Surface Water.........................................................................................2-10 2.4 Biological Environment..................................................................................... 2-11 2.5 Social, Cultural, Economic, and Political Environment .................................... 2-12 2.5.1 Historic Use ...........................................................................................2-12 2.5.2 Economic Characteristics.......................................................................2-13 2.5.3 Private Land Development ....................................................................2-13 2.6 Roadless Areas................................................................................................... 2-13 2.6.1 Ecological Characteristics...................................................................... 2-14 2.6.2 Social and Cultural Values.....................................................................2-15 STEP 3: IDENTIFYING ISSUES.................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Identifying Issues................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1.1 Solitude ....................................................................................................3-2 3.1.2 Air Quality ...............................................................................................3-2 3.1.3 Managing Livestock................................................................................. 3-2 Black Hills National Forest i Forest-Wide Travel Analysis Report 3.1.4 Signing.....................................................................................................3-2 3.1.5 Environmental Health.............................................................................. 3-2 3.1.6 Wildlife Habitat .......................................................................................3-3 3.1.7 Recreational Opportunities ...................................................................... 3-3 3.1.8 Law Enforcement..................................................................................... 3-3 3.1.9 User Conflict............................................................................................3-3 3.1.10 Managing Roads and Trails .....................................................................3-3 3.1.11 Budget......................................................................................................3-4 3.1.12 Safety .......................................................................................................3-4 3.1.13 Economic Stability................................................................................... 3-4 3.1.14 Private Land and the Urban Interface ......................................................3-4 3.1.15 Botanical Resources................................................................................. 3-4 STEP 4: ASSESSING BENEFITS, PROBLEMS, AND RISKS................................... 4-1 4.1 Method................................................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Aquatics ............................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2.1 Affects on Surface and Subsurface Hydrology........................................4-2 4.2.2 Affects on Surface Erosion...................................................................... 4-2 4.2.3 Mass Wasting...........................................................................................4-3 4.2.4 Influence on Stream Channel and Water Quality ....................................4-4 4.2.5 Affects on Water Uses ............................................................................. 4-5 4.2.6 Affects on Wetlands................................................................................. 4-5 4.2.7 Affects on Physical Channel Dynamics...................................................4-6 4.2.8 Affects on Aquatic Organisms.................................................................4-6 4.2.9 Introduction of Non-Native Species ........................................................4-7 4.2.10 Affects on Unique Species....................................................................... 4-7 4.3 Terrestrial Wildlife............................................................................................... 4-8 4.3.1 Affects on Habitat.................................................................................... 4-8 4.3.2 Affects of Human Activities....................................................................4-9 4.3.3 Direct and Indirect Affects on Species ..................................................4-10 4.4 Ecosystem Functions ......................................................................................... 4-12 4.5 Botany................................................................................................................ 4-13 4.5.1 Affects on Habitat.................................................................................. 4-13 4.5.2 Affects of Human Activities..................................................................4-14 4.5.3 Affects on Riparian Vegetation .............................................................4-14 4.5.4 Affects on Unique Communities ...........................................................4-16 4.6 Economics.......................................................................................................... 4-17 4.7 Commodity Production.....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Secretary Richard Benda From
    To: Secretary Richard Benda From: Melissa Bump Date: 06/09/09 RE: May 2009 - 2010 Summary Accomplishing the 2010 Initiative will take the Office of Tourism, the visitor industry, and the State of South Dakota to a whole new level. Feedback and suggestions regarding this summary report are encouraged. GOAL ONE: Double Visitor Spending from $600 Million to $1.2 Billion by 2010 Tourism Office Funding Update: April 2008 April 2009 % Change Deadwood Gaming Tax $ 260,945 $ 244,384 -6.3% Tourism Promotion Tax $ 228,602 $ 252,709 10.5% Total Monthly Deposits $ 489,547 $ 497,093 1.5% FY 2008 vs. 2009 $8,345,367 $8,443,677 1.2% 1A. Change the way we market South Dakota. • Tour Operators: Hosted From the Prairies to the Mountains familiarization tour for 10 domestic tour operators: two from W. Bloomfield, Michigan; two from Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin; one from Mountain Home, Arkansas; two from Woodville, Mississippi; two from Winston-Salem, North Carolina; and one from Indianapolis, Indiana; plus three tour representatives from Suriname. 1C. greater use of partnerships and cooperative efforts. • Million Dollar Challenge: New projects for FY2010 include Cow-Spring Creek Peninsula Recreation Area for Tony Dean Festival, August 7-9; and Watertown CVB’s City Monopoly and Geocaching promotion. • MultiMedia Press Release Co-op: Fort Sisseton had an open rate of 31.84%; Mount Rushmore Facelift had an open rate of 39.45%; Mt. Rushmore Black Hills Gold Jewelry Co. had an open rate of 29.80%; and Reptile Gardens had an open rate of 36.31%. 1E. Capitalize on the existing outdoors opportunities in our state.
    [Show full text]
  • Climbing Inyan Kara
    SACRED MOUNTAIN Climbing Inyan Kara >> By Jerry Penry, PS Displayed with permission • The American Surveyor • Vol. 10 No. 10 • Copyright 2013 Cheves Media • www.Amerisurv.com rom many miles away, solitary mountains have captured the attention of explorers and surveyors. Undoubtedly, thoughts of climbing to the summit dominated their minds as they drew closer. Likewise, Native Americans were drawn to isolated mountains and even revered them with spiritual practices. Inyan Kara Mountain is located in northeastern Wyoming approximately five miles off the western edge of the Black Hills and 13 miles south of the town of Sundance. The mountain rises to a height of 6370 feet above sea level and, at well over 1300 feet above the surrounding terrain, can be described as a solitary peak. The name, Inyan Kara, is a modern term derived from the Lakota word, “Heeng-ya ka-ga”, which means “rock gatherer”, or “the peak which makes stone”. Inyan means “stone” in the Dakota language. The word Kara is not part of this language, but is thought to have been a corruption of “Ka-ga” which translates, “to make”. The name probably refers to the fact that the mountain has long been a place for native peoples to gather quartzite for knapping into projectile points and Above: Lt. G. K. Warren of the U. S. Topographical Engineers led the first military expedition to Inyan Kara in 1857 resulting in a tense standoff with the Sioux Indians. Library of Congress. Displayed with permission • The American Surveyor • Vol. 10 No. 10 • Copyright 2013 Cheves Media • www.Amerisurv.com The peak of Inyan Kara is hidden by the Above: Chief Red Cloud southeastern portion of the horseshoe- gave a clear message shaped outer rim that surrounds the to Sir George Gore at mountain.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment Agriculture
    United States Department of Environmental Assessment Agriculture Forest Service Byway Lakes Enhancement Project August 2013 Hell Canyon Ranger District, Black Hills National Forest Custer & Pennington Counties, South Dakota T02S, R05E Sections 11 T02S, R06E Sections 27, 28 T03S, R05E Sections 15, 22 Horsethief Lake 1938 For Information Contact: David Pickford 330 Mt. Rushmore Road Custer, SD 57730 Phone: (605) 673-4853 Email: [email protected] The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large-print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202)720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800)795-3272 (voice) or (202)720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Table of Contents SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... i CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • South Dakota's Forests Stores As Much Or More Carbon Than That in Neighboring States, Both Within and Across Forest-Type Groups (Fig
    South Dakota’s Forests 2005 Resource Bulletin NRS-35 United States Forest Northern Department of Agriculture Service Research Station Acknowledgments The authors thank the individuals who contributed both to the inventory and analysis of South Dakota’s forest resources. Staff with key responsibility for data management, processing, and estimation included Gary Brand, Mark Hansen, Pat Miles, Kevin Nimerfro, and Jim Solomakos. Staff with key responsibilities in selecting inventory plot locations and collecting field data included Bob Adams, Ryan Binder, James Blehm, Kelsie Chesley, Jessica Cline, Steve Flackey, Deborah Goard, Dick Kessler, Barbara Knight, Greg Liknes, Tim Halberg, Doug Hansen, John Hinners, Dan Huberty, Karlis Lazda, Greg Liknes, Matt Logghe, Mark Majewsky, Issac Moll, Adam Morris, Marc Much, Sheldon Murphy, Trent Murphy, Grant Nielsen, Cassandra Olson, Leah Raymond, Travis Rymal, Jeff Walle, and Kris Williams. Various individuals contributed their time and constructive comments during meetings and manuscript reviews: John Ball, Blaine Cook, John Coulston, Larry DeBlander, Gretchen Smith, and Tom Troxel. Note: Core tables, a glossary, and sample quality assurance/control methods will be included in a companion document, Plains States’ Forests, 2005: Statistics and Quality Assurance, Resource Bulletin NRS-xx, to be published online only. Data for the South Dakota forest inventory can be accessed at: http://fiatools.fs.fed.us Cover: Custer State Park. Photo used with permission by Gregory Josten, South Dakota Department of Agriculture. South Dakota’s Forests 2005 Ronald J. Piva, W. Keith Moser, Douglas D. Haugan, Gregory J. Josten, Gary J. Brand, Brett J. Butler, Susan J. Crocker, Mark H. Hansen, Dacia M. Meneguzzo, Charles H.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwestern Showy Sedge in the Black Hills National Forest, South Dakota and Wyoming
    United States Department of Agriculture Conservation Assessment Forest Service Rocky of the Southwestern Mountain Region Black Hills Showy Sedge in the Black National Forest Custer, Hills National Forest, South South Dakota May 2003 Dakota and Wyoming Bruce T. Glisson Conservation Assessment of Southwestern Showy Sedge in the Black Hills National Forest, South Dakota and Wyoming Bruce T. Glisson, Ph.D. 315 Matterhorn Drive Park City, UT 84098 email: [email protected] Bruce Glisson is a botanist and ecologist with over 10 years of consulting experience, located in Park City, Utah. He has earned a B.S. in Biology from Towson State University, an M.S. in Public Health from the University of Utah, and a Ph.D. in Botany from Brigham Young University EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Southwestern showy sedge, Carex bella Bailey, is a cespitose graminoid that occurs in the central and southern Rocky Mountain region of the western United States and Mexico, with a disjunct population in the Black Hills that may be a relict from the last Pleistocene glaciation (Cronquist et al., 1994; USDA NRCS, 2001; NatureServe, 2001). Southwestern showy sedge is quite restricted in range and habitat in the Black Hills. There is much that we don’t know about the species, as there has been no thorough surveys, no monitoring, and very few and limited studies on the species in the area. Long term persistence of southwestern showy sedge is enhanced due to the presence of at least several populations within the Black Elk Wilderness and Custer State Park. Populations in Custer State Park may be at greater risk due to recreational use and lack of protective regulations (Marriott 2001c).
    [Show full text]
  • Black Hills National Forest
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Rocky Black Hills Mountain Region Black Hills National National Forest Forest Custer South Dakota March 2006 Land and Resource Management Plan 1997 Revision Phase II Amendment LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS/ACRONYMS ACHP President’s Advisory Council on MMBF Million Board Feet Historic Preservation MMCF Million Cubic Feet A.F.F. Agricultural, Forestry, and Fishing MOU Memorandum of Understanding Services MPB Mountain Pine Beetle AMP Allotment Management Plan NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality AOI Annual Operating Instructions Standards ARC At-risk Communities NEPA National Environmental Policy Act ASQ Allowable Sale Quantity NF National Forest ATV All Terrain Vehicle NFMA National Forest Management Act AUM Animal Unit Month NFP National Fire Plan BA Botanical Areas NFPA National Forest Protection BA Biological Assessment Association BBC Birds of Conservation Concern NFS National Forest System BBS Breeding Bird Survey National Register National Register of Historic Places BCR Bird Conservation Regions NIC Non-Interchangeable Component BE Biological Evaluation NOA Notice of Availability BHNF Black Hills National Forest NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Black Hills Black Hills Ecoregion Administration BLM Bureau of Land Management NOI Notice of Intent BMP Best Management Practices NWCG National Wildland Fire Coordinating BOR Bureau of Recreation Group BTU British Thermal Unit OHV Off Highway Vehicle CEQ Council on Environmental Quality PCPI Per Capita Personal Income CF Cubic Feet PIF Partners
    [Show full text]
  • VPHS RCHPC Draft Essay Ri
    The Ridgeline and the Creek Landscape and Memory in Rapid City Executive Summary For millennia, the natural resources and allure of the Black Hills have drawn people to the region to hunt, explore, pray, recreate, and live in and around what is now Rapid City. The community sits where the open prairie meets rocky hills and thick forests. For generations, area residents have shaped their lives, in terms of both work and play, in response to the opportunities and limitations presented by these surroundings. High ridges on Skyline Drive and Cowboy Hill, flowing waters in Rapid Creek and Canyon Lake, and pine forests and grasslands fill the city limits. Rapid City’s scenery attracts visitors and transplants to the area. Although connections to place are articulated through different cultural and spiritual lenses, many residents feel a strong connection to the landscapes, waterscapes, and skyscapes in and around Rapid City. The settlement of Rapid City was part of the imposition of Euro-American land ethics onto the Northern Plains. Throughout Rapid City’s history, as in much of the American West, competition for land and natural resources has fueled tensions over public and private management, industry and development, and preservation and conservation. These tensions have shaped and reshaped the landscape even as natural forces have altered the environment through slow processes like erosion or climate change, as well as sudden disasters like floods, fires, and blizzards. The landscape that endures, reflected in public parks and open spaces, has played a critical part in building and sustaining community identity and character. In many cases, it has been preserved by private citizens and public policymakers at the behest of their constituents.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Hills, Badlands & Mount Rushmore
    COMPLIMENTARY $3.95 2019/2020 YOUR COMPLETE GUIDE TO THE PARKS BLACK HILLS, BADLANDS & MOUNT RUSHMORE ACTIVITIES • SIGHTSEEING • PRESERVATION EVENTS • TRAILS • HISTORY • MAPS • MORE OFFICIAL PARTNERS T:5.375” S:4.75” WELCOME S:7.375” SO TASTY EVERYONE WILL WANT A BITE. T:8.375” Welcome to the Black Hills and Badlands of South Dakota! As you explore our fine state, I’m confident you’ll find some of the best scenery, most unique attractions and friendliest people in the country. Our scenic drives, such as Spearfish Canyon and the 70-mile Peter Norbeck Scenic Byway, will surprise you with amazing views around every corner. Just 50 miles east, you’ll find a moon-like landscape in Badlands National Park. If you need to stretch your legs, you’ll find more than 400 miles of nature walks and hikes. South Dakota is also home to two of the world’s largest Chad Coppess/South Dakota Dept. of Tourism mountain carvings: patriotic Mount Rushmore National Me- Governor Dennis Daugaard & First Lady Linda Daugaard morial and Crazy Horse Memorial, a tribute to Native Ameri- cans. I encourage you to visit both and learn the history and story behind each of these magnificent sculptures. I also encourage you to take a drive through Custer State Park, the country’s second largest state park, where wildlife abounds. Along Wildlife Loop Road, you’ll have a chance to see antelope, deer, prairie dogs, “beg- ging” burros and the park’s 1,300-member bison herd. In fact, Austin-Lehman Adventures named Custer State Park one of the world’s Top 10 Wildlife Destinations.
    [Show full text]
  • Norbeck Wildlife Preserve Landscape Assessment
    Norbeck Wildlife Preserve Landscape Assessment Black Hills National Forest Completed by: Continuing Education in Ecosystem Management Group Module XII June 12 – June 23, 2006 Acknowledgements This assessment would not have been possible without the assistance and patience of numerous individuals. We hope we spelled your name correctly and we are extremely grateful for all your help and assistance. Shelly Deisch – Ecologist, SD Game, Fish and Parks Gerard Baker - Superintendent, Mt. Rushmore National Memorial Bill Hill – Forester, Custer State Park Joe McFarland - Custer County, County Commissioner Ken Davis - Pennington County, County Commissioner Jim Brickley - Mayor Hill City Gary Brundige - Wildlife Biologist, Custer State Park Craig Pugsley - Recreation, Custer State Park Greg Josten – SD State Forestry Coe Foss – SD State Forestry Mike Pflaun, Chief Ranger Mt. Rushmore National Memorial Dan Licht, Reg. WL Biologist, Custer State Park Al Johnson – Owner, Palmer Gulch KOA Dave Ressler - Custer Chamber of Commerce Jim Sellars - Keystone Chamber of Commerce Mike Verchio - Hill City Chamber of Commerce Bob Demerssenan - Rapid City Chamber of Commerce John Forney - SD Tourism Committee Aaron Everett - Black Hills Forest Resource Association Justin Cutler - Recreational Adventures Co. Mike Jacobs – Black Hills Aerial Adventures Mike Dennyson - Developer Brian Brademeyer - Defenders of the Black Hills Sam Clawson - Sierra Club Jeremy Nichols - Biodiversity Conservation Alliance Colin Paterson - The Norbeck Society Nancy Hilding - Audubon
    [Show full text]
  • Fire in the Black Hills Forest-Grass Ecotonel
    Fire in the Black Hills Forest-Grass Ecotonel F. ROBERT GARTNER AND WESLEY W. THOMPSON2 Associate Professor of Range Ecology and Range Research Assistant, Animal Science Department, West River Agricultural Research and Extension Center of South Dakota State University, 801 San Francisco Street, Rapid City, SD 57701 INTRODUCTION SOUTH Dakota is located in the geographical center of the North American continent, equidistant from the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, and midway between the North Pole and the equa­ tor (United States Dept. Interior 1967). The Black Hills are situated along the state's western border (Fig. 1) lying principally within parallels 43 and 45 degrees north latitude and meridians, 103 and 104 degrees, 30 minutes, west longitude, largely in South Dakota, partly in Wyoming (Johnson 1949). Total area is about 5,150 mi2, including the Bear Lodge Mountains in northeastern Wyoming (Orr 1959). After leading a scientific party through the Black Hills in the summer of 1875, Colonel R. I. Dodge (1876) concluded: The Black Hills country is a true oasis in a wide and dreary desert. The approaches from every direction are through long 1 Approved by the director of the South Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station as Journal Series No. 1115. • Associate Professor of Range Ecology and Range Research Assistant, Animal Science Department, West River Agricultural Research and Extension Center of South Dakota State University, 801 San Francisco Street., Rapid City, South Dakota. 37 F. R. GARTNER AND W. ·W. THOMPSON o o o (Y) (\J o<::t o o MONTANA ---···----··~~------~------~--------L45° SOUTH DAKOTA ~ ______--4------- ____-+-44° WYOMING SCALE o••• miles 45 FIG.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology, Siliviculture, and Management of Black Hills Ponderosa Pine
    United States Department Ecology, Silviculture, and of Agriculture Forest Service Management of Black Hills Rocky Mountain Research Station Ponderosa Pine General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-97 Wayne D. Shepperd and Michael A. Battaglia September 2002 Shepperd, Wayne D.; Battaglia, Michael A. 2002. Ecology, siliviculture, and management of Black Hills ponderosa pine. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-97. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 112 p. Abstract This paper presents a broad-based synthesis of the general ecology of the ponderosa pine ecosystem in the Black Hills. This synthesis contains information and results of research on ponderosa pine from numerous sources within the Black Hills ecosystem. We discuss the silvical characteristics of ponderosa pine, natural disturbances that govern ecosystem processes, wildlife habitat and management, various silvicultural methods to manage ponderosa pine forests, and watershed management of the Black Hills. Keywords: Black Hills, silviculture, ecology, ponderosa pine, even-aged management, uneven-aged management, reforestation, wildlife habitat, natural disturbance, snags, insects, disease, fire history Authors Wayne D. Shepperd is a Research Silviculturist, at the U.S. Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station in Fort Collins, CO. He is also administrator of the Manitou Experimental Forest, near Woodland Park, Colorado. He holds a B.S. in Outdoor Recreation, and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Silviculture from Colorado State University. A Colorado native, Dr. Shepperd has been with the Forest Service since 1969. The author of over 70 research publications, he is a recognized expert on the ecology, growth, and management of Rocky Mountain Forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Deadwood, South Dakota CLE Excursion, July 17-20, 2020
    Washburn University School of Law Deadwood, South Dakota CLE Excursion July 17-20, 2020 Lodge at Deadwood PARTICIPANT INFORMATION Washburn University School of Law Deadwood, SD CLE Excursion July 17‐20, 2020 COVID-19 UPDATE Masks will be provided and required for all attendees when in public spaces. Social distancing will be implemented and several CLEs are outside to increase safety of participants. SCHEDULE FRIDAY, JULY 17 Information Table – 5 – 7 p.m. | Oggie’s Sports Bar & Emporium Stop by Oggie’s Sports Bar between 5 and 7 p.m. to grab your Washburn Law CLE and social distancing materials. Karli Davis, director of Alumni Relations, will also be available to answer any last‐ minute questions you have about all the upcoming activities. SATURDAY, JULY 18 Attorney Mindfulness Through Yoga CLE – 1hr | 9 a.m. | Firepit near Lodge Pool (Rain Location – Conference Area Foyer) Dean Carla Pratt will discuss the benefits of lawyer mindfulness practice and use the construct of Yoga to conduct a mindfulness session. As our lives get busier and we are inundated with information throughout all hours of the day, it is important to step back to pause. Dean Pratt will share an update on the latest research on mindfulness, including how it benefits productivity, enhances relationships, and contributes to overall attorney wellness. This session will also teach a few basic yoga poses and include tips for being more mindful in everyday activities. Both attorneys and their guests are encouraged to attend. Yoga mats will be provided to each registrant for this CLE. Indigenous Perspectives CLE – 1hr | 1:30 p.m.
    [Show full text]