25.8 Intermarium Ingles
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
I. Background Information the Cristero War Or Cristero
Historical Crisis Committee: Cristero War Members of the Dais: Myrna del Mar González & Gabriel García CSIMNU: September 23 & 24, 2016 I. Background Information The Cristero War or Cristero Rebellion (1926–1929), otherwise called La Cristiada, was a battle in many western Mexican states against the secularist, hostile to Catholic, and anticlerical strategies of the Mexican government. The defiance was set off by order under President Plutarco Elías Calles of a statute to authorize the anticlerical articles of the Mexican Constitution of 1917 (otherwise called the Calles Law). Calles tried to wipe out the force of the Catholic Church and associations subsidiary with it as an organization, furthermore smothering well known religious festivals. The gigantic prominent provincial uprising was implicitly upheld by the Church progressive system and was helped by urban Catholic backing. US Ambassador Dwight W. Morrow expedited transactions between the Calles government and the Church. The administration made a few concessions; the Church pulled back its support for the Cristero contenders and the contention finished in 1929. It can be seen as a noteworthy occasion in the battle among Church and State going back to the nineteenth century with the War of Reform, however, it can likewise be translated as the last real laborer uprising in Mexico taking after the end of the military period of the Mexican Revolution in 1920. II. Church-State Conflict The Mexican Revolution (1910–20) remains the biggest clash in Mexican history. The fall of Dictator Porfirio Díaz unleashed disarray with numerous battling groups and areas. The Catholic Church and the Díaz government had gone to a casual modus vivendi 1Whereby the State did not uphold the anticlerical articles of the liberal Constitution of 1857, and additionally did not cancel them. -
Father Malachi Martin's Visit to the Senate and Our Lady of Fatima
Dr. Robert Hickson 16 May 2016 Saint Brendan the Navigator (d.578) Saint Simon Stock (d. 1265) Saint John Nepomucene (d. 1393) Father Malachi Martin's Visit to the Senate and Our Lady of Fatima --Epigraphs-- On the Gift of Fear (Donum Timoris) as Part of the Order of Fear (Ordo Timoris): “One of the last verifiable [components] of the theses that define the image of man for our time holds that it is not seemly for man to be afraid. Waters from two sources are mingled in this attitude. One is an enlightened liberalism that relegates fearfulness to the realm of the unreal and in whose world view, accordingly, there is no room for fear except in a figurative sense. The other is an un-Christian stoicism that is secretly allied with both presumption and despair [i.e., the two forms of hopelessness, both of which are also grave sins against the Holy Ghost, in “the classical theology of the Church”] and [this stoicism] confronts in defiant invulnerability—without fear, but also without hope —the evils of existence, which it sees with admirable clarity. “The classical theology of the Church is especially removed from both the oversimplification of liberalism and the desperate rigidity of stoicism. It takes for granted that fears are a reality of human existence. And it takes equally for granted that man will respond to what is objectively fearful with fear [e.g., such as being permanently separated from the beloved, to include Our Beloved Lord and Vita Aeterna also with the Blessed Mother]....On the basis of this theology one must assume, then, that something is not quite in order [in the due and proportioned “ordo timoris”] when a man is afraid of nothing [“intimiditas”], and that the ideal of 'stoic' invulnerability and fearlessness is based on a false interpretation of man and reality itself. -
Lost in Translation?
La Historia, lost in translation? Actas del XIII Congreso de la Asociación de Historia Contemporánea EDICIÓN PREPARADA POR: Damián A. González Madrid Manuel Ortiz Heras Juan Sisinio Pérez Garzón La Historia, lost in translation? Actas del XIII Congreso de la Asociación de Historia Contemporánea Edición Preparada por: Damián A. González Madrid Manuel Ortiz Heras Juan Sisinio Pérez Garzón Cuenca, 2017 CONGRESO DE LA ASOCIACIÓN DE HISTORIA CONTEMPORÁNEA (13ª. 2016. Albacete) La Historia, lost in translation? : XIII Congreso de la Asociación de Historia Contemporánea, Albacete, 21 a 23 de septiembre de 2016 / edición preparada por, Damián A. González Madrid, Manuel Ortiz Heras, Juan Sisinio Pérez Garzón.– Cuenca : Ediciones de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 2017 3815 p. ; 24 cm.– (Jornadas y Congresos ; 9) ISBN 978-84-9044-265-4 1. Historia contemporánea - Congresos y asambleas I. González Madrid, Damián A., ed. lit. II. Ortiz Heras, Manuel, ed. lit. III. Pérez Garzón, Juan Sisinio, ed. lit. IV. Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, ed. V. Título VI. Serie 94(100)"18/..."(063) HBLW Cualquier forma de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública o transformación solo puede ser realizada con la autorización de EDICIONES DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE CASTILLA-LA MANCHA salvo excepción prevista por la ley. Diríjase a CEDRO (Centro Español de Derechos Reprográficos – www.cedro.org), si necesita fotocopiar o escanear algún fragmento de esta obra. ã de los textos: sus autores. ã de las imágenes: sus autores. ã de la edición: Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha. Edita: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha. Colección JORNADAS Y CONGRESOS nº 9 Diseño de la cubierta: C.I.D.I. -
The Cristero War and Mexican Collective Memory
History in the Making Volume 13 Article 5 January 2020 The Movement that Sinned Twice: The Cristero War and Mexican Collective Memory Consuelo S. Moreno CSUSB Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/history-in-the-making Part of the Latin American History Commons Recommended Citation Moreno, Consuelo S. (2020) "The Movement that Sinned Twice: The Cristero War and Mexican Collective Memory," History in the Making: Vol. 13 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/history-in-the-making/vol13/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in History in the Making by an authorized editor of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Articles The Movement that Sinned Twice: The Cristero War and Mexican Collective Memory By Consuelo S. Moreno Abstract: Many scattered occurrences in Mexico bring to memory the 1926-1929 Cristero War, the contentious armed struggle between the revolutionary government and the Catholic Church. After the conflict ceased, the Cristeros and their legacy did not become part of Mexico’s national identity. This article explores the factors why this war became a distant memory rather than a part of Mexico’s history. Dissipation of Cristero groups and organizations, revolutionary social reforms in the 1930s, and the intricate relationship between the state and Church after 1929 promoted a silence surrounding this historical event. Decades later, a surge in Cristero literature led to the identification of notable Cristero figures in the 1990s and early 2000s. -
Brief History of the Cristero War and Mexico's Struggle for Religious Freedom the Role of the U.S. Knights of Columbus in Resp
Brief History of the Cristero War and Mexico’s Struggle for Religious Freedom When President Plutarco Calles took over as president of Mexico in 1924, he did not want the Catholic Church to be a part of any moral teachings to its citizens. He did not want God to be a part of anyone’s life. He wanted to bring Mexico’s population to belong to a Socialist state, and wanted to ensure that all citizens were going to be educated under the government’s dictatorship and secular mindset. He also wanted to ensure that only the government would have the freedom to form the minds of its citizens and insisted that the Church was poisoning the minds of the people. He implemented the “Law for Reforming the Penal Code” or “Calles’ Law”, which severely restricted the free practice of religion in Mexico. Priests or religious wearing clerical garb in public, and clerics who spoke out against the government could be jailed for five years. The Mexican bishops suspended public religious services in response to the law, and supported an economic boycott against the government. Violence soon erupted, as bands of Catholic peasants battled federal forces. Priests were shot and hung, Church property seized, and many religious institutions closed. The Cristeros’ battle cry was “Viva Cristo Rey!” (“Long live Christ the King!”). During the three-year war (1926-1929), approximately 90,000 people were killed. There are a total of 35 Martyrs who have been canonized. The Role of the U.S. Knights of Columbus in Response to the Cristero War In August of 1926, days after the Calles Law took effect, the U.S. -
The Meaning of the Cristero Religious War Against the Mexican Revolution *
The Meaning of the Cristero Religious War Against the Mexican Revolution * JAMES W. WILKIE Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcs/article/8/2/214/842539 by guest on 01 October 2021 Fighting in the name of "Christ the King," thousands of Cath- olics engaged in armed revolt against the Mexican Revolutionary regime from 1926 to 1929. The meaning of the Cristero rebellion has never been well understood because scholars have generally considered the Roman Catholic Church and the Mexican govern- mentas monoliths. In fact, Mexican hierarchical and lay Cath- olic groups were sharply divided over the nature of the Church- state conflict; and deep political differences existed among the leaders of the Mexican Revolution. Consequently, a modus vivendi was negotiated in 1929 as moderate Church leaders re- jected Catholic military action andas government officials sought a welcome respite in the Revolution's campaign to regulate the Church. The purpose of this study is to reexamine the origins of the Cristero conflict, to identify its goals, and tO explain the strange outcome of the Church-state truce of 1929. Standard scholarly approaches to understanding the Cristero War, based upon the assumption of monolithic Church-state policy, have taken the following tacks. First, the Church's flagrant violation of the law forced the government suppression of unconstitutional practices of worship. 1 Alternatively, the government, searching for a pre- text to crush the Catholic religion, purposefully forced the Cris- teros into rebellion? Recently a third, composite view has de- picted the conflict as "inevitable" since "the lines had been drawn" between two intransigent forces "in agrarian reforms, in *This article is part of a larger study of the Mexican Revolution. -
The Splintering of Spain
This page intentionally left blank ii ii The Splintering of Spain This book explores the ideas and culture surrounding the cataclysmic civil war that engulfed Spain from 1936 to 1939. It features specially commissioned articles from leading historians in Spain, Britain and the USA which examine the complex interaction of national and local factors, contributing to the shape and course of the war. They argue that the ‘splintering of Spain’ resulted from the myriad cultural clea- vages of society in the 1930s. Thus, this book views the civil war less as a single great conflict between two easily identifiable sets of ideas, social classes or ways of life, than historians have previously done. The Spanish tragedy, at the level of everyday life, was shaped by many tensions, both those that were formally political and those that were to do with people’s perceptions and understanding of the society around them. CHRIS EALHAM is Senior Lecturer in History at Lancaster University. His previous publications include Policing the City: Class, Culture and Conflict in Barcelona, 1898–1937 (2005). MICHAEL RICHARDS is Senior Lecturer in Contemporary European History at the University of the West of England. His previous publica- tions include A Time of Silence: Civil War and the Culture of Repression in Franco’s Spain, 1936–1945 (1998). The Splintering of Spain Cultural History and the Spanish Civil War, 1936 –1939 Edited by Chris Ealham and Michael Richards cambridge university press Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge cb2 2ru,UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Informationonthistitle:www.cambridge.org/9780521821780 © Cambridge University Press 2005 This publication is in copyright. -
La Oposición Católica Conservadora Del Sinarquismo Cívico Al Aborto Y La Homosexualidad En La Ciudad De México, 2000-2007
La oposición católica conservadora del sinarquismo cívico al aborto y la homosexualidad en la Ciudad de México, 2000-2007 Austreberto Martínez Villegas* Universidad Panamericana RESUMEN: La Unión Nacional Sinarquista (UNS), organización nacionalista conservadora y antico- munista, tuvo su principal periodo de auge entre 1937 y 1944, año cuando una división interna dio lugar a dos facciones: la política y la cívica. Esta última existió en la en la capital del país, hasta 2009, mantuvo actividades dedicadas a la formación cívica y polemizó a través de volantes y boletines de prensa en contra de algunos de los temas que formaron parte de la agenda de izquierda de los gobiernos locales. Los sinarquistas cívicos plantearon un discurso ideológico totalmente contrario al Estado laico y condenaron abiertamente el aborto por no coincidir con las directrices de la moral católica. También, polemizaron sobre las uniones civiles entre personas del mismo sexo, equiparables legalmente al matrimonio, a las cuales se opusieron. Estas posturas no hicieron concesiones a la secularización de la sociedad y pretendieron mantener, en el siglo XXI, una lucha por lo que ellos planteaban como el reinado social de Cristo. El presente artículo es fruto de una investigación realizada en el archivo personal del autor, archivo que contiene documentos relacionados con el movimiento sinarquista que nunca antes habían sido puestos a consideración para una investigación de índole académica. PALABRAS CLAVE: Sinarquismo, Ciudad de México, conservadurismo, catolicismo, Pro-Vida. The conservative Catholic opposition of civic synarchism to abortion and homosexuality in Mexico City, 2000-2007 ABSTRACT: The Unión Nacional Sinarquista (UNS-National Synarchist Union), a conservative, anti-communist nationalist organization, experienced its boom between 1937 and 1944, the latter being when an internal division gave rise to two factions: the political and the civic. -
The Holy See, Social Justice, and International Trade Law: Assessing the Social Mission of the Catholic Church in the Gatt-Wto System
THE HOLY SEE, SOCIAL JUSTICE, AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW: ASSESSING THE SOCIAL MISSION OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IN THE GATT-WTO SYSTEM By Copyright 2014 Fr. Alphonsus Ihuoma Submitted to the graduate degree program in Law and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Juridical Science (S.J.D) ________________________________ Professor Raj Bhala (Chairperson) _______________________________ Professor Virginia Harper Ho (Member) ________________________________ Professor Uma Outka (Member) ________________________________ Richard Coll (Member) Date Defended: May 15, 2014 The Dissertation Committee for Fr. Alphonsus Ihuoma certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: THE HOLY SEE, SOCIAL JUSTICE, AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW: ASSESSING THE SOCIAL MISSION OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IN THE GATT- WTO SYSTEM by Fr. Alphonsus Ihuoma ________________________________ Professor Raj Bhala (Chairperson) Date approved: May 15, 2014 ii ABSTRACT Man, as a person, is superior to the state, and consequently the good of the person transcends the good of the state. The philosopher Jacques Maritain developed his political philosophy thoroughly informed by his deep Catholic faith. His philosophy places the human person at the center of every action. In developing his political thought, he enumerates two principal tasks of the state as (1) to establish and preserve order, and as such, guarantee justice, and (2) to promote the common good. The state has such duties to the people because it receives its authority from the people. The people possess natural, God-given right of self-government, the exercise of which they voluntarily invest in the state. -
Ramon Jrade State University of New York, Binghamton
INQUIRIES INTO THE CRISTERO INSURRECTION AGAINST THE MEXICAN REVOLUTION* Ramon Jrade State University of New York, Binghamton Interest in the Cristero insurrection against the Mexican Revolu tion has continued unabated since the 1960s. Until now all the major published studies have viewed the rebellion as the climactic outcome of the long-standing conflict between church and state in Mexico. 1 By adopting this perspective, these works have deepened knowledge of church-state relations and sharply delineated the composition and de velopment of Catholic and revolutionary factions. At the same time, these studies have offered a wide range of interpretations of the Cristero movement, interpretations that are incompatible with one another. This article examines the published works on the church-state conflict and the Cristero insurrection. Its aim is to show that their com peting interpretations of the uprisings derive from shared assumptions that entail assigning responsibility for the violent struggle to one or more of the contending groups and, with one exception, imputing a religious motive to the rural rebels. The article also examines two re cently published studies that focus more narrowly on the Cristero stronghold of the Los Altos region of Jalisco. The final section proposes an alternative line of inquiry that relies on a comparative approach to set aside existing contradictions and to place the Cristero phenomenon in its proper context. A principal concern of the major studies has been to reconstruct a sequence of events that subsumes under the church-state conflict the outbreak and termination of the violent struggle in specific sections of the countryside. -
The Nazi-Instigated National Synarchist Union of Mexico: What It
Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 31, Number 28, July 16, 2004 EIRSynarchy WHAT IT MEANS FOR TODAY The Nazi-Instigated National Synarchist Union ofMexico Part 2, by William F. Wertz, Jr. Part 1, which appeared in last week’s EIR, traced the origins D. Roosevelt had spoken in December 1932, and then again in of Synarchism in Mexico, including the founding of the Na- his Inaugural Address on March 1, 1933. The most important tional Synarchist Union (UNS) by the Nazis and the Spanish aspect of the agreement was that the United States officially Falangists, and its wartime role in support of the Axis cause. recognized Mexico’s sovereign ownership of its subsoil Here, a new chapter begins, after Pearl Harbor and the Mexi- wealth. The agreement contained six points: 1) an evaluation can declaration of war against the Axis powers: An anti- of the expropriated oil properties; 2) Mexico agreed to satisfy Roosevelt Anglo-American imperialist faction, acting all outstanding claims of U.S. citizens for revolutionary dam- through the Dulles-Buckley networks associated with Cardi- age and expropriated properties, through the payment of $40 nal Spellman and Bishop Fulton Sheen of the United States, million over 14 years; 3) negotiation of a reciprocal trade moved in to control the UNS. These networks remain active agreement; 4) the U.S. Treasury would stabilize currency to this day, including notably against the LaRouche forces in through the purchase of Mexican pesos, and would buy Mexi- Ibero-America. Two former LaRouche associates, Marivilia can silver at the fixed rate of 35¢ an ounce, renewing the Carrasco and Fernando Quijano, went over to the syn- arrangement it had prior to the oil expropriations; and 6) the archist camp. -
Pdf (Accessed January 21, 2011)
Notes Introduction 1. Moon, a Presbyterian from North Korea, founded the Holy Spirit Association for the Unification of World Christianity in Korea on May 1, 1954. 2. Benedict XVI, post- synodal apostolic exhortation Saramen- tum Caritatis (February 22, 2007), http://www.vatican.va/holy _father/benedict_xvi/apost_exhortations/documents/hf_ben-xvi _exh_20070222_sacramentum-caritatis_en.html (accessed January 26, 2011). 3. Patrician Friesen, Rose Hudson, and Elsie McGrath were subjects of a formal decree of excommunication by Archbishop Burke, now a Cardinal Prefect of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signa- tura (the Roman Catholic Church’s Supreme Court). Burke left St. Louis nearly immediately following his actions. See St. Louis Review, “Declaration of Excommunication of Patricia Friesen, Rose Hud- son, and Elsie McGrath,” March 12, 2008, http://stlouisreview .com/article/2008-03-12/declaration-0 (accessed February 8, 2011). Part I 1. S. L. Hansen, “Vatican Affirms Excommunication of Call to Action Members in Lincoln,” Catholic News Service (December 8, 2006), http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0606995.htm (accessed November 2, 2010). 2. Weakland had previously served in Rome as fifth Abbot Primate of the Benedictine Confederation (1967– 1977) and is now retired. See Rembert G. Weakland, A Pilgrim in a Pilgrim Church: Memoirs of a Catholic Archbishop (Grand Rapids, MI: W. B. Eerdmans, 2009). 3. Facts are from Bruskewitz’s curriculum vitae at http://www .dioceseoflincoln.org/Archives/about_curriculum-vitae.aspx (accessed February 10, 2011). 138 Notes to pages 4– 6 4. The office is now called Vicar General. 5. His principal consecrator was the late Daniel E. Sheehan, then Arch- bishop of Omaha; his co- consecrators were the late Leo J.