Responsive Access to Space: Space Test Program Mission S26 Capt Holly Borowski, Mr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Responsive Access to Space: Space Test Program Mission S26 Capt Holly Borowski, Mr Responsive Access to Space: Space Test Program Mission S26 Capt Holly Borowski, Mr. Kenneth Reese DOD Space Test Program, Space and Missile Systems Center, Space Development and Test Wing 3548 Aberdeen Avenue SE, Kirtland AFB, NM 87117; (505) 846-2530 [email protected] [email protected] Mr. Mike Motola Orbital Sciences Corp. 3380 South Price Road Chandler, AZ 85248-3534 [email protected] Abstract— Space Test Program Mission S26 (STP-S26) is the twenty sixth dedicated small launch vehicle mission of 1. INTRODUCTION the Department of Defense Space Test Program.*† STP-S26 extends previous standard interface development efforts, The mission of the Department of Defense (DOD) Space implementing a number of capabilities aimed at enabling Test Program (STP) is to provide access to space for responsive access to space for small experimental satellites experiments from the DOD Space Experiment Review and payloads. The STP-S26 Minotaur-IV launch vehicle is Board (SERB). STP-S26 is the twenty sixth dedicated configured in a Multi-Payload Adaptor configuration which small launch vehicle mission for STP. In total, STP-S26 includes the following features: will launch 14 experiments on seven separate spacecraft, • The Multi-Payload Adaptor (MPA), which was one of the most for a single launch in the 40-year history of developed by Orbital Sciences Corporation for STP to STP. STP-S26 will be launched on a Minotaur-IV launch launch up to four ESPA-class satellites on the vehicle being developed by Orbital Sciences Corporation Minotaur-IV. (OSC) from the Kodiak Launch Complex under a contract • Provisions for the inclusion of up to four Poly-Picosat with the Alaska Aerospace Corporation (AAC). The Orbital Deployers (P/PODs) to be mounted on the current launch is expected late spring to summer 2010. Stage 4 avionics cylinder. • A dual orbit capability provided by the Hydrazine Auxiliary Propulsion System (HAPS). The design provides volume and mass for four additional payloads attached to the HAPS avionics cylinder. The actual payload manifest of STP-S26 includes four ESPA-class satellites manifested on the MPA and three cubesats. One of the four ESPA-class satellites is STPSat- 2, the first Standard Interface Vehicle. STP implemented a flexible, responsive “dual path” process for a late satellite manifest change. The goal was to delay the final manifest decision as late as possible while minimizing risk. STP-S26 is a complex multi-payload mission and incorporates many innovative capabilities enabling responsive access to space. TABLE OF CONTENTS Figure 1 – Fully Loaded ESPA Stack TABLE OF CONTENTS...........................................................1 on EELV Illustration 1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................1 2. MINOTAUR-IV MULTIPAYLOAD ADAPTOR DESIGN The STP-S26 mission extends previous standard interface REFERENCE MISSION...........................................................3 development efforts intended to maximize access to space 3. DESIGN REFERENCE MISSION ON STP-S26 ...................5 for experimental satellites and payloads. One such effort 4. RESPONSIVE LATE MANIFEST PROCESS.........................6 initiated by STP is the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle 5. CONCLUSION ....................................................................8 (EELV) Secondary Payload Adapter (ESPA). Many large REFERENCES ........................................................................8 EELV missions launch with unused mass and volume BIOGRAPHY ..........................................................................8 margin. The ESPA ring was developed to accommodate up to six satellites as secondary payloads on an EELV mission. 1 Figure 1 illustrates the ESPA ring and secondary payloads * 978-1-4244-3888-4/10/$25.00 ©2010 IEEE † IEEEAC paper # 1220, Updated January 4, 2009 on a notional EELV mission. 1 The Planner’s Guide also details the mechanical and electrical interface standards, environmental testing standards, and mission integration and documentation requirements. Satellites compliant with the ESPA standards greatly increase their probability of gaining access to space. Like ESPA, the STP Standard Interface Vehicle (SIV) was developed to improve access to space for SERB payloads. Itself an ESPA-class satellite, the SIV additionally defines a standard interface for payloads. Described in the STP-SIV Payload Users Guide (reference 2), adherence to these standard interfaces makes a payload compatible with SIV and increase the probability of manifest. The SIV is designed to operate over a range of low earth orbit altitudes and inclinations and meet the power, data, attitude and thermal requirements of a broad spectrum of potential payloads. It additionally is designed to integrate onto multiple launch vehicles, including the Minotaur I, Minotaur IV, Minotaur V, and an ESPA ring. The SIV can accommodate up to four payloads weighing 132 lbs (60 kg) and requiring 100 Watts of power on orbit in total. STPSat- 2 (described later in this paper) is the first SIV satellite and is manifested on STP-S26. The second SIV, STPSat-3, is Figure 2 – STP-SIV provides a currently under development. standard payload interface The Minotaur-IV family of launch vehicles is developed by The ESPA Payload Planner’s Guide (reference 1) defines Orbital Sciences Corporation under the Orbital/Suborbital standards for satellites planning to be compatible with the Program 2 (OSP-2) managed by the Space Development ESPA ring. Some of the key standards: and Test Wing. It builds upon previous low cost launch • Mass not-to-exceed (NTE) 400 lb (181 kg) with the initiatives such as Taurus and Minotaur-1. The first three center of gravity CG not more than 20 in (51 cm) from stages of the Minotaur IV consist of refurbished the interface plane government furnished equipment (GFE) Peacekeeper Stages • Volume NTE 24”x28”x38” (61 cm x 71 cm x 97 cm) 1, 2 and 3. The Stage 4 solid motor is the same Orion 38 Figure 3 – Minotaur IV Space Launch Vehicle 2 design used on Minotaur I, Pegasus, Taurus, and other Orbital Sciences Corporation between June – October 2007. Orbital launch vehicles. An optional Star 48V motor is The prioritized government goals for the study were: available for additional performance. Figure 3 depicts the 1. Provide access to space for STPSat-2 Minotaur-IV launch vehicle. Figure 4 shows the Minotaur- 2. Demonstrate dual-orbit capability of the Minotaur IV IV mass capacity to circular low earth orbit for a number of with Hydrazine Auxiliary Propulsion System (HAPS); inclinations from Kodiak, AK. same inclination, different altitude 3. Demonstrate multi-payload capability on Minotaur IV to fly additional ESPA-class SVs 4. Provide access to space for additional SERB rideshare experiments The primary orbit was specified to be 650 km at 72 degrees inclination driven by the primary payload, STPSat-2. The secondary orbit had the same inclination and was to be circular as high as possible to demonstrate HAPS performance. In conducting the MPA study Orbital also had some corporate objectives. These included meeting or exceeding all the study objectives, incorporating design flexibility so it could meet future mission needs and not be a single point solution, and maximizing commonality by building on existing Minotaur IV design and incorporating Minotaur-V conceptual design concepts. Figure 4 – Minotaur IV Performance from Kodiak Some of the deliverables of the study included: • Configuration layout for the standard fairing for the Minotaur IV launch vehicle including payload envelopes and the proposed adapters 2. MINOTAUR-IV MULTIPAYLOAD ADAPTOR • Trajectory data with margins specified DESIGN REFERENCE MISSION • Draft interface control document (ICD) for Minotaur IV MPA Design Reference Mission, including The Minotaur-IV Multiple Payload Adaptor (MPA) study mechanical and electrical Interfaces was sponsored by the Space Test Program and conducted by • Results of preliminary coupled loads analysis Figure 5 – Minotaur-IV MPA3 Design Reference Mission • Execution plan for Minotaur IV multi-payload missions including schedules and funding profile The result of the study was the Minotaur-IV MPA design reference mission. The results met all the Air Force objectives and incorporated commonality and reuse wherever possible. Figure 5 depicts the configuration layout for the MPA design reference mission. In this configuration the HAPS with its avionics cylinder sits atop a RUAG separation system on the HAPS interstage cone. On top of the HAPS cylinder is the non-separating multi- payload adaptor (MPA). Figure 6 shows an upper view of the MPA. Figure 7 – Arrangement of four ESPA-class satellites on the MPA fairing dynamic envelope. The Minotaur-IV MPA design reference mission also provides volume and mass for deploying space vehicles from the sides of the HAPS avionics cylinder. Figure 8 shows the configuration of the HAPS auxiliary payload space. There are locations for four payloads each having a Figure 6 – Minotaur-IV Multi-Payload Adaptor volume not to exceed 20” x 20” x 48” (51 cm x 51 cm x 122 cm). The HAPS cylinder can either accommodate a The MPA has the capacity to accommodate four ESPA class configuration of two payloads each up to 130 lb (59 kg), or satellites, each weighing up to 400 lbs (181 kg) and four payloads each up to 65 lb (30 kg). Future MPA measuring 24”x28”x38” (61 cm x 71 cm x 97 cm). Figure 7 missions could utilize this capability to deploy spacecraft depicts an arrangement
Recommended publications
  • Space) Barriers for 50 Years: the Past, Present, and Future of the Dod Space Test Program
    SSC17-X-02 Breaking (Space) Barriers for 50 Years: The Past, Present, and Future of the DoD Space Test Program Barbara Manganis Braun, Sam Myers Sims, James McLeroy The Aerospace Corporation 2155 Louisiana Blvd NE, Suite 5000, Albuquerque, NM 87110-5425; 505-846-8413 [email protected] Colonel Ben Brining USAF SMC/ADS 3548 Aberdeen Ave SE, Kirtland AFB NM 87117-5776; 505-846-8812 [email protected] ABSTRACT 2017 marks the 50th anniversary of the Department of Defense Space Test Program’s (STP) first launch. STP’s predecessor, the Space Experiments Support Program (SESP), launched its first mission in June of 1967; it used a Thor Burner II to launch an Army and a Navy satellite carrying geodesy and aurora experiments. The SESP was renamed to the Space Test Program in July 1971, and has flown over 568 experiments on over 251 missions to date. Today the STP is managed under the Air Force’s Space and Missile Systems Center (SMC) Advanced Systems and Development Directorate (SMC/AD), and continues to provide access to space for DoD-sponsored research and development missions. It relies heavily on small satellites, small launch vehicles, and innovative approaches to space access to perform its mission. INTRODUCTION Today STP continues to provide access to space for DoD-sponsored research and development missions, Since space first became a viable theater of operations relying heavily on small satellites, small launch for the Department of Defense (DoD), space technologies have developed at a rapid rate. Yet while vehicles, and innovative approaches to space access.
    [Show full text]
  • FASTSAT a Mini-Satellite Mission…..A Way Ahead”
    Proposed Abstract: Under the combined Category and Title: “FASTSAT a Mini-Satellite Mission…..A Way Ahead” Authors: Mark E. Boudreaux, Joseph Casas, Timothy A. Smith The Fast Affordable Science and Technology Spacecraft (FASTSAT) is a mini-satellite weighing less than 150 kg. FASTSAT was developed as government-industry collaborative research and development flight project targeting rapid access to space to provide an alternative, low cost platform for a variety of scientific, research, and technology payloads. The initial spacecraft was designed to carry six instruments and launch as a secondary “rideshare” payload. This design approach greatly reduced overall mission costs while maximizing the on-board payload accommodations. FASTSAT was designed from the ground up to meet a challenging short schedule using modular components with a flexible, configurable layout to enable a broad range of payloads at a lower cost and shorter timeline than scaling down a more complex spacecraft. The integrated spacecraft along with its payloads were readied for launch 15 months from authority to proceed. As an ESPA-class spacecraft, FASTSAT is compatible with many different launch vehicles, including Minotaur I, Minotaur IV, Delta IV, Atlas V, Pegasus, Falcon 1/1e, and Falcon 9. These vehicles offer an array of options for launch sites and provide for a variety of rideshare possibilities. FASTSAT a Mini Satellite Mission …..A Way Ahead 15th Annual Space & Missile Defense Conference Session Track 1.2 : Operations for Small, Tactical Satellites Mark Boudreaux/NASA
    [Show full text]
  • Astrobiology in Low Earth Orbit
    The O/OREOS Mission – Astrobiology in Low Earth Orbit P. Ehrenfreund1, A.J. Ricco2, D. Squires2, C. Kitts3, E. Agasid2, N. Bramall2, K. Bryson4, J. Chittenden2, C. Conley5, A. Cook2, R. Mancinelli4, A. Mattioda2, W. Nicholson6, R. Quinn7, O. Santos2, G. Tahu5, M. Voytek5, C. Beasley2, L. Bica3, M. Diaz-Aguado2, C. Friedericks2, M. Henschke2, J.W. Hines2, D. Landis8, E. Luzzi2, D. Ly2, N. Mai2, G. Minelli2, M. McIntyre2, M. Neumann3, M. Parra2, M. Piccini2, R. Rasay3, R. Ricks2, A. Schooley2, E. Stackpole2, L. Timucin2, B. Yost2, A. Young3 1Space Policy Institute, Washington, DC, USA [email protected], 2NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA, 3Robotic Systems Laboratory, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, USA, 4Bay Area Environmental Research Institute, Sonoma, CA, USA, 5NASA Headquarters, Washington DC, USA, 6University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, 7SETI Institute, Mountain View, CA, USA, 8Draper Laboratory, Cambridge, MA, USA Abstract. The O/OREOS (Organism/Organic Exposure to Orbital Stresses) nanosatellite is the first science demonstration spacecraft and flight mission of the NASA Astrobiology Small- Payloads Program (ASP). O/OREOS was launched successfully on November 19, 2010, to a high-inclination (72°), 650-km Earth orbit aboard a US Air Force Minotaur IV rocket from Kodiak, Alaska. O/OREOS consists of 3 conjoined cubesat (each 1000 cm3) modules: (i) a control bus, (ii) the Space Environment Survivability of Living Organisms (SESLO) experiment, and (iii) the Space Environment Viability of Organics (SEVO) experiment. Among the innovative aspects of the O/OREOS mission are a real-time analysis of the photostability of organics and biomarkers and the collection of data on the survival and metabolic activity for micro-organisms at 3 times during the 6-month mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights in Space 2010
    International Astronautical Federation Committee on Space Research International Institute of Space Law 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren c/o CNES 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren UNITED NATIONS 75015 Paris, France 2 place Maurice Quentin 75015 Paris, France Tel: +33 1 45 67 42 60 Fax: +33 1 42 73 21 20 Tel. + 33 1 44 76 75 10 E-mail: : [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Fax. + 33 1 44 76 74 37 URL: www.iislweb.com OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS URL: www.iafastro.com E-mail: [email protected] URL : http://cosparhq.cnes.fr Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law The United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs is responsible for promoting international cooperation in the peaceful uses of outer space and assisting developing countries in using space science and technology. United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs P. O. Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel: (+43-1) 26060-4950 Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5830 E-mail: [email protected] URL: www.unoosa.org United Nations publication Printed in Austria USD 15 Sales No. E.11.I.3 ISBN 978-92-1-101236-1 ST/SPACE/57 *1180239* V.11-80239—January 2011—775 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS UNITED NATIONS OFFICE AT VIENNA Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law Progress in space science, technology and applications, international cooperation and space law UNITED NATIONS New York, 2011 UniTEd NationS PUblication Sales no.
    [Show full text]
  • The O/OREOS Mission—Astrobiology in Low Earth Orbit
    Acta Astronautica 93 (2014) 501–508 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Acta Astronautica journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/actaastro The O/OREOS mission—Astrobiology in low Earth orbit P. Ehrenfreund a,n, A.J. Ricco b, D. Squires b, C. Kitts c, E. Agasid b, N. Bramall b, K. Bryson d, J. Chittenden b, C. Conley e, A. Cook b, R. Mancinelli d, A. Mattioda b, W. Nicholson f, R. Quinn g, O. Santos b,G.Tahue,M.Voyteke, C. Beasley b,L.Bicac, M. Diaz-Aguado b, C. Friedericks b,M.Henschkeb,D.Landish, E. Luzzi b,D.Lyb, N. Mai b, G. Minelli b,M.McIntyreb,M.Neumannc, M. Parra b, M. Piccini b, R. Rasay c,R.Ricksb, A. Schooley b, E. Stackpole b, L. Timucin b,B.Yostb, A. Young c a Space Policy Institute, Washington DC, USA b NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA c Robotic Systems Laboratory, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, USA d Bay Area Environmental Research Institute, Sonoma, CA, USA e NASA Headquarters, Washington DC, USA f University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA g SETI Institute, Mountain View, CA, USA h Draper Laboratory, Cambridge, MA, USA article info abstract Article history: The O/OREOS (Organism/Organic Exposure to Orbital Stresses) nanosatellite is the first Received 19 December 2011 science demonstration spacecraft and flight mission of the NASA Astrobiology Small- Received in revised form Payloads Program (ASP). O/OREOS was launched successfully on November 19, 2010, to 22 June 2012 a high-inclination (721), 650-km Earth orbit aboard a US Air Force Minotaur IV rocket Accepted 18 September 2012 from Kodiak, Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • Cubesat-Based Science Missions for Geospace and Atmospheric Research
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION (NSF) CUBESAT-BASED SCIENCE MISSIONS FOR GEOSPACE AND ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH annual report October 2013 www.nasa.gov www.nsf.gov LETTERS OF SUPPORT 3 CONTACTS 5 NSF PROGRAM OBJECTIVES 6 GSFC WFF OBJECTIVES 8 2013 AND PRIOR PROJECTS 11 Radio Aurora Explorer (RAX) 12 Project Description 12 Scientific Accomplishments 14 Technology 14 Education 14 Publications 15 Contents Colorado Student Space Weather Experiment (CSSWE) 17 Project Description 17 Scientific Accomplishments 17 Technology 18 Education 18 Publications 19 Data Archive 19 Dynamic Ionosphere CubeSat Experiment (DICE) 20 Project Description 20 Scientific Accomplishments 20 Technology 21 Education 22 Publications 23 Data Archive 24 Firefly and FireStation 26 Project Description 26 Scientific Accomplishments 26 Technology 27 Education 28 Student Profiles 30 Publications 31 Cubesat for Ions, Neutrals, Electrons and MAgnetic fields (CINEMA) 32 Project Description 32 Scientific Accomplishments 32 Technology 33 Education 33 Focused Investigations of Relativistic Electron Burst, Intensity, Range, and Dynamics (FIREBIRD) 34 Project Description 34 Scientific Accomplishments 34 Education 34 2014 PROJECTS 35 Oxygen Photometry of the Atmospheric Limb (OPAL) 36 Project Description 36 Planned Scientific Accomplishments 36 Planned Technology 36 Planned Education 37 (NSF) CUBESAT-BASED SCIENCE MISSIONS FOR GEOSPACE AND ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH [ 1 QB50/QBUS 38 Project Description 38 Planned Scientific Accomplishments 38 Planned
    [Show full text]
  • 120 Application of Nanosatellites in the Near
    SES 2013 Ninth Scientific Conference with International Participation SPACE, ECOLOGY, SAFETY 20 – 22 November 2013, Sofia, Bulgaria APPLICATION OF NANOSATELLITES IN THE NEAR-EARTH SPACE INVESTIGATION Daniela Boneva1, Lachezar Filipov1, Krasimira Yankova1, Deyan Gotchev1, Zhivko Zhelezov2, Georgi Chamov2, Mariya Bivolarska2, Spaska Yaneva2 1Space Research and Technology Institute – Bulgarian Academy of Sciences 2Space Research Ltd e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] Keywords: Nanosatellites; Near-Earth Space; Zodiacal Light; Abstract: We present based characteristics of the nanosatellites’ equipment and we point to the advantages of their usage. The purpose of this paper is to survey the applications of nanosatellites as a new and advanced technology. It is reviewed the most employable of them in space science and technology. We present the conception of our new project that will investigate the polarimetry of the Zodiacal light on a Sun-synchronous low Earth orbit. ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ НА НАНОСАТЕЛИТИ В ИЗСЛЕДВАНЕТО НА БЛИЗКИЯ КОСМОС Даниела Бонева1, Лъчезар Филипов1, Красимира Янкова1, Деян Гочев1, Живко Железов2, Георги Чамов2, Мария Биволарска2, Спаска Янева2 1Институт за космически изследвания и технологии – Българска академия на науките 2Спейс рисърч ООД e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] Ключови думи: Наносателити;Близък космос;Зодиакална светлина; Резюме: Представени са основни характеристики на наносателитите и са посочени предимствата на използването им. Целта на тази статия е да се проучат приложенията на наносателитите като нова и напреднала технология. Разгледани са най-пригодни за заетост от тях в областта на космическите науки и технологии.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronautilus-18.Pdf
    Kosmos to dla nas najbardziej zaawansowana nauka, która często redefiniuje poglądy filozofów, najbardziej zaawansowana technika, która stała się częścią nasze- go życia codziennego i czyni je lepszym, najbardziej Dwumiesięcznik popularnonaukowy poświęcony tematyce wizjonerski biznes, który każdego roku przynosi setki astronautycznej. ISSN 1733-3350. Nr 18 (1/2012). miliardów dolarów zysku, największe wyzwanie ludz- Redaktor naczelny: dr Andrzej Kotarba kości, która by przetrwać, musi nauczyć się żyć po- Zastępca redaktora: Waldemar Zwierzchlejski Korekta: Renata Nowak-Kotarba za Ziemią. Misją magazynu AstroNautilus jest re- lacjonowanie osiągnięć współczesnego świata w każdej Kontakt: [email protected] z tych dziedzin, przy jednoczesnym budzeniu astronau- Zachęcamy do współpracy i nadsyłania tekstów, zastrze- tycznych pasji wśród pokoleń, które jutro za stan tego gając sobie prawo do skracania i redagowania nadesłanych świata będą odpowiadać. materiałów. Przedruk materiałów tylko za zgodą Redakcji. Spis treści PW-Sat: Made in Poland! ▸ 2 Polska ma długie tradycje badań kosmicznych – polskie instrumenty w ramach najbardziej prestiżowych misji badają otoczenie Ziemi i odległych planet. Ale nigdy dotąd nie trafił na orbitę satelita w całości zbudowany w polskich labo- ratoriach. Może się nim stać PW-Sat, stworzony przez studentów Politechniki Warszawskiej. Choć przedsięwzięcie ma głównie wymiar dydaktyczny, realizuje również ciekawy eksperyment: przyspieszoną deorbitację. CubeSat, czyli mały może więcej ▸ 15 Objętość decymetra sześciennego oraz masa nie większa niż jeden kilogram. Ta- kie ograniczenia konstrukcyjne narzuca satelitom standard CubeSat. Oryginalnie opracowany z myślą o misjach studenckich (bazuje na nim polski PW-Sat), Cu- beSat zyskuje coraz większe rzesze zwolenników w sektorze komercyjnym, woj- skowym i naukowym. Sprawdźmy, czym są i co potrafią satelity niewiele większe od kostki Rubika.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Satellite Doldrums
    25 Years of Small Satellites AC4/5 MISSION Siegfried Janson The Aerospace Corporation Presented August 9, 2011 © The Aerospace© The Aerospace Corporation Corporation 2010 2011 Microsatellite Launch History: Last 25 years Microsatellite launch rates rose rapidly in the early 1960’s, and peaked in 1965. Non-Strela microsatellite launch rates hit bottom from 1977 to 1987; the “Small 2 Satellite Doldrums”. They’ve recovered over the past 25 years. Nanosatellite Launch History: About 3 nanosatellites were launched per year during the first decade of space exploration. Launch rates hit zero between 1972 to 1989, but stabilized at ~2 per year 3 through 2002. The CubeSat paradigm has enabled a rapid rise in launch rates. Picosatellite Launch History: Only two active picosatellites were flown before 2000. The Stanford Orbiting Picosatellite Automated Launcher (OPAL) ejected 6 picosatellites into orbit, kicking- st 4 off a 21 century return of picosatellites and the CubeSat Era. Small Satellite Launch History: The First 30 years • The 1960’s: Boom and Bust - Small satellite launch rates rapidly increase in early 1960’s as the Space Age unfolds - Small satellite launch rates decrease in latter half of decade as launch vehicle throw weight capability increases and satellites get bigger (on average). • The 1970’s: Soviet Microsatellites Dominate - Strela-1M constellation deployed; it eventually requires over 300 spacecraft - Western small satellite launch rates continue to decline as satellites grow in size • The 1980’s: Small Satellite Doldrums (1977-1987) - No nanosatellites or picosatellites launched - Less than 5 Western microsatellites launched per year - DARPA initiates LightSat program; holds workshop in 1987 - First AIAA/USU Small Satellite Conference in 1987 - “Doldrums” end in 1987 By 1986, the Soviet Union was actively launching military communications microsatellites, but the rest of the world was experiencing a dearth of new small 5 satellites.
    [Show full text]
  • STS-S26 Stage Set
    SatCom For Net-Centric Warfare September/October 2010 MilsatMagazine STS-S26 stage set Military satellites Kodiak Island Launch Complex, photo courtesy of Alaska Aerospace Corp. PAYLOAD command center intel Colonel Carol P. Welsch, Commander Video Intelligence ..................................................26 Space Development Group, Kirtland AFB by MilsatMagazine Editors ...............................04 Zombiesats & On-Orbit Servicing by Brian Weeden .............................................38 Karl Fuchs, Vice President of Engineering HI-CAP Satellites iDirect Government Technologies by Bruce Rowe ................................................62 by MilsatMagazine Editors ...............................32 The Orbiting Vehicle Series (OV1) by Jos Heyman ................................................82 Brig. General Robert T. Osterhaler, U.S.A.F. (Ret.) CEO, SES WORLD SKIES, U.S. Government Solutions by MilsatMagazine Editors ...............................76 India’s Missile Defense/Anti-Satellite NEXUS by Victoria Samson ..........................................82 focus Warfighter-On-The-Move by Bhumika Baksir ...........................................22 MILSATCOM For The Next Decade by Chris Hazel .................................................54 The First Line Of Defense by Angie Champsaur .......................................70 MILSATCOM In Harsh Conditions.........................89 2 MILSATMAGAZINE — SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2010 Video Intelligence ..................................................26 Zombiesats & On-Orbit
    [Show full text]
  • ASTRODYNAMICS 2011 Edited by Hanspeter Schaub Brian C
    ASTRODYNAMICS 2011 Edited by Hanspeter Schaub Brian C. Gunter Ryan P. Russell William Todd Cerven Volume 142 ADVANCES IN THE ASTRONAUTICAL SCIENCES ASTRODYNAMICS 2011 2 AAS PRESIDENT Frank A. Slazer Northrop Grumman VICE PRESIDENT - PUBLICATIONS Dr. David B. Spencer Pennsylvania State University EDITORS Dr. Hanspeter Schaub University of Colorado Dr. Brian C. Gunter Delft University of Technology Dr. Ryan P. Russell Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. William Todd Cerven The Aerospace Corporation SERIES EDITOR Robert H. Jacobs Univelt, Incorporated Front Cover Photos: Top photo: Cassini looking back at an eclipsed Saturn, Astronomy picture of the day 2006 October 16, credit CICLOPS, JPL, ESA, NASA; Bottom left photo: Shuttle shadow in the sunset (in honor of the end of the Shuttle Era), Astronomy picture of the day 2010 February 16, credit: Expedition 22 Crew, NASA; Bottom right photo: Comet Hartley 2 Flyby, Astronomy picture of the day 2010 November 5, Credit: NASA, JPL-Caltech, UMD, EPOXI Mission. 3 ASTRODYNAMICS 2011 Volume 142 ADVANCES IN THE ASTRONAUTICAL SCIENCES Edited by Hanspeter Schaub Brian C. Gunter Ryan P. Russell William Todd Cerven Proceedings of the AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference held July 31 – August 4 2011, Girdwood, Alaska, U.S.A. Published for the American Astronautical Society by Univelt, Incorporated, P.O. Box 28130, San Diego, California 92198 Web Site: http://www.univelt.com 4 Copyright 2012 by AMERICAN ASTRONAUTICAL SOCIETY AAS Publications Office P.O. Box 28130 San Diego, California 92198 Affiliated with the American Association for the Advancement of Science Member of the International Astronautical Federation First Printing 2012 Library of Congress Card No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dynamics and Control of the Cubesail Mission — a Solar Sailing
    © 2010 Andrzej Pukniel. THE DYNAMICS AND CONTROL OF THE CUBESAIL MISSION—A SOLAR SAILING DEMONSTRATION BY ANDRZEJ PUKNIEL DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy in Aerospace Engineering in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2010 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Victoria Coverstone, Chair Professor John Prussing Professor Rodney Burton Professor Gary Swenson ABSTRACT The proposed study addresses two issues related to the slow emergence of solar sailing as a viable space propulsion method. The low technology readiness level and complications related to stowage, deployment, and support of the sail structure are both addressed by combining the CU Aerospace and University of Illinois-developed UltraSail and CubeSat expertise to design a small-scale solar sail deployment and propulsion experiment in low Earth orbit. The study analyzes multiple aspects of the problem from initial sizing and packaging of the solar sail film into two CubeSat-class spacecraft, through on-orbit deployment dynamics, attitude control of large and flexible space structure, and predictions of performance and orbital maneuvering capability. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The following work would have not been possible without the continuous support and encouragement of my advisor, Professor Coverstone. Her patience, scientific insight, and enthusiasm are a rare combination that fosters a unique research environment. It allows the students to develop both as highly competent engineers as well as young individuals. Few advisors sincerely care for their students’ personal development as much as Professor Coverstone and I consider myself privileged to be part of her research group. I would also like to thank Professors Rod Burton and Gary Swenson as well as Dr.
    [Show full text]