DOCSLIB.ORG

Degradation of Water Quality at Wakulla Springs, Florida: Assessment and Recommendations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Degradation of Water Quality at Wakulla Springs, Florida: Assessment and Recommendations Degradation of water quality at Wakulla Springs, Florida: assessment and recommendations Item Type conference_item Download date 26/09/2021 05:34:48 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/18868 DEGRADATION OF WATER QUALITY AT WAKULLA SPRINGS, FLORIDA: ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Report of the Peer Review Committee on the Workshop Solving Water Pollution Problems in the Wakulla Springshed of North Florida May 12–13, 2005 Tallahassee, Florida December 2005 PEER REVIEWERS David E. Loper, Ph. D., Chair Professor Emeritus Department of Geological Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Institute 18 Keen Building, MC 4360 Florida State University Tallahassee, FL 32306-4320 William M. Landing, Ph. D. Professor of Environmental and Marine Chemistry Department of Oceanography, 325 OSB Florida State University Tallahassee, FL 32306-4320 Curtis D. Pollman, Ph. D. Principal Scientist Tetra Tech, Inc. Research & Development Division 408 W. University Ave., Suite 301 Gainesville, FL 32601 Amy B. Chan Hilton, Ph. D. Assistant Professor Florida A&M University–Florida State University College of Engineering Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Associate, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Institute 2525 Pottsdamer Street Tallahassee, FL 32310-6046 i CONTENTS Peer Reviewers................................................................................................................................. i ABSTRACT.................................................................................................................................... v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... vi Introduction................................................................................................................................ vi Nutrient Loading ....................................................................................................................... vii Dark Water................................................................................................................................. ix Other Comments......................................................................................................................... ix Recommendations.........................................................................................................................x CHAPTER 1. Introduction and Background ................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose of this Report.......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Other Reports ....................................................................................................................... 2 1.2.1. Nitrate Loading and Non-point Source Pollution in the Lower St. Marks–Wakulla Rivers Watershed.................................................................................................................................. 2 1.2.2. Woodville Recharge Basin Aquifer Protection Study, Phases I and II...................................... 5 1.2.3. A Strategy for Water Quality Protection: Wastewater Treatment in the Wekiva Springs Area......................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.4. Florida’s Springs: Strategies for Protection & Restoration.................................................... 9 1.2.5. Protecting Florida’s Springs: Land Use Planning Strategies and Best Management Practices............................................................................................................................................. 10 1.3 Regulatory Framework ...................................................................................................... 10 1.4 Physical Setting .................................................................................................................. 11 1.4.1 Surface Water Features............................................................................................................. 13 1.4.2 Groundwater Features .............................................................................................................. 14 Chapter 2: Water Quality Problems in Wakulla Springs and River ............................................ 19 2.1 Nitrate Loading .................................................................................................................. 19 2.1.1 Nitrate and the Nitrogen Cycle................................................................................................. 19 2.1.2 Extent and Causes of Nitrate Contamination........................................................................... 19 2.1.3 Extent and Causes of Invasive Exotic Aquatic Plant Growth .................................................. 22 2.2 Extent and Causes of Loss of Water Clarity ...................................................................... 24 CHAPTER 3: Sources of the Problems ....................................................................................... 26 3.1 Summary and Evaluation of Nitrogen Limitation .............................................................. 26 3.2 Sources of Nitrate............................................................................................................... 26 ii 3.3 Wastewater Treatment Facilities. ...................................................................................... 29 3.3.1 Trend of Groundwater Flow...................................................................................................... 30 3.4 Nitrate Data........................................................................................................................ 31 3.5 Fertilizer and Livestock...................................................................................................... 37 3.6 Septic Systems .................................................................................................................... 37 3.7 Sources of Dark Water ....................................................................................................... 38 CHAPTER 4: Solutions to the Problems..................................................................................... 39 4.1 Mitigation Strategies for Nutrient Loading........................................................................ 39 4.1.1 Wastewater Treatment Facilities.............................................................................................. 40 4.1.2 Septic Systems........................................................................................................................... 41 4.1.3 Fertilizers and Livestock .......................................................................................................... 41 4.2 Mitigation Strategies for the Loss of Water Clarity........................................................... 41 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................ 42 References..................................................................................................................................... 43 Table 1: List of acronyms ............................................................................................................. 45 Web sites of interest...................................................................................................................... 46 APPENDICES .............................................................................................................................. 47 Appendix A: Questions for the Peer Review Committee.......................................................... 47. Appendix B: Key Peer Review Committee Questions and Answers......................................... 49 Appendix C. List of Reviewers.................................................................................................. 51 Appendix D. History of Hydrilla Removal Efforts at Wakulla Springs.................................... 53 E.1 The Case against N Limitation .................................................................................................... 55 E.2 The Case for N Limitation............................................................................................................ 55 E.3 The Case for Reducing Plant Growth by Limiting Nitrate Loading to the Springshed ............... 56 Appendix F: Phosphate in the Floridan Aquifer and Wakulla Springs ................................... 60 Appendix G. Specific Suggestions for Research on Nutrients and Biota................................. 67 Appendix H. Speculation on the Origin of Dark Water ........................................................... 68 Appendix I: Ongoing Programs, City of Tallahassee Water Utility ......................................... 69 iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Aerial photo of Wakulla Spring and River..................................................................... vi Figure 2: Average nitrate concentrations in ground water sampled from the SESF monitoring wells .......................................................................................................... 6 Figure 3: Nitrate data from 1986 to 2004 for the SESF well with the highest average nitrate concentrations................................................................................................... 6 Figure 5: Florida portion of the Wakulla–St. Marks watershed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Comprehensive River Management Plan
    September 2011 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WEKIVA WILD AND SCENIC RIVER SYSTEM Florida __________________________________________________________________________ The Wekiva Wild and Scenic River System was designated by an act of Congress on October 13, 2000 (Public Law 106-299). The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 USC 1247) requires that each designated river or river segment must have a comprehensive river management plan developed. The Wekiva system has no approved plan in place. This document examines two alternatives for managing the Wekiva River System. It also analyzes the impacts of implementing each of the alternatives. Alternative A consists of the existing river management and trends and serves as a basis for comparison in evaluating the other alternative. It does not imply that no river management would occur. The concept for river management under alternative B would be an integrated program of goals, objectives, and actions for protecting and enhancing each outstandingly remarkable value. A coordinated effort among the many public agencies and entities would be needed to implement this alternative. Alternative B is the National Park Service’s and the Wekiva River System Advisory Management Committee’s preferred alternative. Implementing the preferred alternative (B) would result in coordinated multiagency actions that aid in the conservation or improvement of scenic values, recreation opportunities, wildlife and habitat, historic and cultural resources, and water quality and quantity. This would result in several long- term beneficial impacts on these outstandingly remarkable values. This Environmental Assessment was distributed to various agencies and interested organizations and individuals for their review and comment in August 2010, and has been revised as appropriate to address comments received.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Exhibits
    CONSERVATION EXHIBITS: • Comprehensive Wetlands Management Program • Econlockhatchee and Wekiva River Protection Areas and Wekiva Study Area CON Comprehensive Wetlands Management Program Comprehensive Wetlands Management Program Goal #1: Direct incompatible land use away from wetlands. Goal #2: Protect the high quality mosaic of inter-connected systems in the Wekiva, Lake Jesup and East Areas. Special Areas Future Land Use Map Land Acquisition Designations East Rural Wekiva Econ Unique Conservation County Urban/Rural 42% of the River Basin Rivers Basin Planning Land Areas Boundary wetlands in Techniques Use Seminole County are in public Clustering, ownership Limited PUD Specifics, Riparian Uses No Rural Zoning Review Criteria W-1 Habitat Zoning encroachment Protection and and 50' Buffer Zone Rule Land Use Overlay The voters of Seminole County have recently Riparian Habitat approved an additional five Protection Zoning million dollar bond Zone Rule referendum for the purchase of Natural Lands. Special Zoning Development and Land Use Review Requirements Process WETLANDS Wetland PROTECTION Mitigation CONSERVATION CON Exhibit-1 Last amended on 12/09/2008 by Ord. 2008-44 U S LIN E D R S 4 W 4 BA LM Y BE AC H DR Last amended on byOrd. 2008-44 12/09/2008 CONSERVATION 1 E E S W K A I S E V R N K A D 4 I BEA R L AKE RD S V 3 L A P A 6 R T K R I N ED EN PAR K AV E B L G U R S Econlockhatchee River Protection Area Wekiva Area Area Study Boundary Protection River Econlockhatchee Area Protection River Wekiva Urban/Rural Boundary N D N R E D L L R
    [Show full text]
  • Study Area Development Part 2
    2. Study Area Guiding Principles The recommended study area is intended to meet the purpose and need of the project and minimize impacts to the social, cultural, natural and physical environment. A study area is a large area that is wide enough to contain several options for transportation improvements. The following “Guiding Principles” were used to identify the general study area within which a range of alternatives would be evaluated: • Follows, where feasible, existing road alignments through environmentally sensitive areas; • Minimizes direct impacts to wetlands; • Minimizes impacts on springshed and ground water recharge areas; • Serves an identified long-term regional transportation need; • Attempts to improve the connectivity of existing wildlife areas; • Relieves or removes traffic demands on SR 46 and provides a North-South connection from SR 46 to US 441 with limited interchanges; • Minimizes impacts to habitat and species; • Avoids, or mitigates if required, impacts on conservation lands and their proper management; • Seeks to minimize impacts on existing neighborhoods and residential communities; and, • Does not encourage or promote additional development from already approved land uses. 3. Composite Constraint Mapping The major features from the social, cultural, and natural environmental constraints were layered together to create a composite area map showing the major constraints and areas of concern (see Exhibit G-5). Areas without major constraints represent the most reasonable areas for alternatives development. These
    [Show full text]
  • Kings Bay/Crystal River Springs Restoration Plan
    Kings Bay/Crystal River Springs Restoration Plan Kings Bay/Crystal River Springs Restoration Plan Kings Bay/Crystal River Springs Restoration Plan Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................. 1 Section 1.0 Regional Perspective ............................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Why Springs are Important ...................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Springs Coast Springs Focus Area ........................................................................................... 2 1.4 Description of the Springs Coast Area .................................................................................... 3 1.5 Climate ......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.6 Physiographic Regions .............................................................................................................. 5 1.7 Karst ............................................................................................................................................. 5 1.8 Hydrogeologic Framework ...................................................................................................... 7 1.9 Descriptions of Selected Spring Groups ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • West-Central Florida's Aquifers: Florida's Great Unseen Water Resources
    West-Central Florida's aquifers: Florida's great unseen water resources Item Type monograph Publisher Southwest Florida Water Management District Download date 27/09/2021 20:30:45 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/19407 Southwest Florida Water Management District West-Central Florida’s Aquifers Florida’s Great Unseen Water Resources Th e abundance of Florida’s freshwater resources provides a great attraction for residents and tourists alike. Th e rivers, lakes and wetland areas found throughout the state serve as a water-lover’s paradise for fi shing, boating, hiking and many other recreational activities. However, the majority of Florida’s fresh water is inaccessible to the public for recreational purposes. In fact, most of the state’s fresh water lies underground in Florida’s aquifers. While the ground water within Florida’s aquifers remains unseen, it still serves a vital role in maintaining the quality of life for all Floridians. Th e District is responsible for protecting this important resource. A cave diver explores the Upper Floridan aquifer through a spring. What Is an Aquifer? An aquifer is a layer of underground rock or sand that stores water. Th e ground water within an aquifer can fi ll the spaces between grains of sand and gravel, or it can fi ll the cracks and fi ssures in solid rock. Th e water within an aquifer is constantly moving. How quickly the water moves depends on both the physical characteristics of the aquifer and the water-level gradient, or slope, in the aquifer. In aquifers with large caverns or many large fractures, water can travel very quickly.
    [Show full text]
  • Saltwater Intrusion and Quality of Water in the Floridan Aquifer System, Northeastern Florida
    SALTWATER INTRUSION AND QUALITY OF WATER IN THE FLORIDAN AQUIFER SYSTEM, NORTHEASTERN FLORIDA By Rick M. Spechler U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 92-4174 Prepared in cooperation with the CITY OF JACKSONVILLE and the ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Tallahassee, Florida 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Robert M. Hirsch, Acting Director The use of firm, trade, and brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services Suite 3015 Box 25286 227 N. Bronough Street Denver, CO 80225-0286 Tallahassee, FL 32301 800-ASK-USGS Additional information about water resources in Florida is available on the World Wide Web at http://fl.water.usgs.gov CONTENTS Abstract.................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Scope....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Previous Investigations...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Public Workshop for Minimum Flows and Levels Priority Lists and Schedules for the CFWI Area
    Joint Public Workshop for Minimum Flows and Levels Priority Lists and Schedules for the CFWI Area St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) September 5, 2019 St. Cloud, Florida 1 Agenda 1. Introductions and Background……... Don Medellin, SFWMD 2. SJRWMD MFLs Priority List……Andrew Sutherland, SJRWMD 3. SWFWMD MFLs Priority List..Doug Leeper, SWFWMD 4. SFWMD MFLs Priority List……Don Medellin, SFWMD 5. Stakeholder comments 6. Adjourn 2 Statutory Directive for MFLs Water management districts or DEP must establish MFLs that set the limit or level… “…at which further withdrawals would be significantly harmful to the water resources or ecology of the area.” Section 373.042(1), Florida Statutes 3 Statutory Directive for Reservations Water management districts may… “…reserve from use by permit applicants, water in such locations and quantities, and for such seasons of the year, as in its judgment may be required for the protection of fish and wildlife or the public health and safety.” Section 373.223(4), Florida Statutes 4 District Priority Lists and Schedules Meet Statutory and Rule Requirements ▪ Prioritization is based on the importance of waters to the State or region, and the existence of or potential for significant harm ▪ Includes waters experiencing or reasonably expected to experience adverse impacts ▪ MFLs the districts will voluntarily subject to independent scientific peer review are identified ▪ Proposed reservations are identified ▪ Listed water bodies that have the potential to be affected by withdrawals in an adjacent water management district are identified 5 2019 Draft Priority List and Schedule ▪ Annual priority list and schedule required by statute for each district ▪ Presented to respective District Governing Boards for approval ▪ Submitted to DEP for review by Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquifer System in Southern Florida
    HYDRGGEOLOGY, GRQUOT*WATER MOVEMENT, AND SUBSURFACE STORAGE IN THE FLORIDAN AQUIFER SYSTEM IN SOUTHERN FLORIDA REGIONAL AQUIFER-SYSTEM ANALYSIS \ SOUTH CAROLINA L.-S.. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1403-G AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the cur­ rent-year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Sur­ vey publications released prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" Publications that are listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" are no longer available. Prices of reports released to the open files are given in the listing "U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports," updated month­ ly, which is for sale in microfiche from the U.S. Geological Survey, Books and Open-File Reports Section, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225. Reports released through the NTIS may be obtained by writing to the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161; please include NTIS report number with inquiry. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices given below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations,
    [Show full text]
  • FLORIDA STATE PARKS FEE SCHEDULE (Fees Are Per Day Unless Otherwise Noted) 1. Statewide Fees Admission Range $1.00**
    FLORIDA STATE PARKS FEE SCHEDULE (Fees are per day unless otherwise noted) 1. Statewide Fees Admission Range $1.00** - $10.00** (Does not include buses or admission to Ellie Schiller Homosassa Springs Wildlife State Park or Weeki Wachee Springs State Park) Single-Occupant Vehicle or Motorcycle Admission $4.00 - $6.00** (Includes motorcycles with one or more riders and vehicles with one occupant) Per Vehicle Admission $5.00 - $10.00** (Allows admission for 2 to 8 people per vehicle; over 8 people requires additional per person fees) Pedestrians, Bicyclists, Per Passenger Exceeding 8 Per Vehicle; Per $2.00 - $5.00** Passenger In Vehicles With Holder of Annual Individual Entrance Pass Admission Economically Disadvantaged Admission One-half of base (Must be Florida resident admission fee** and currently participating in Food Stamp Program) Bus Tour Admission $2.00** per person (Does not include Ellie Schiller Homosassa Springs Wildlife State Park, or $60.00 Skyway Fishing Pier State Park, or Weeki Wachee Springs State Park) whichever is less Honor Park Admission Per Vehicle $2.00 - $10.00** Pedestrians and Bicyclists $2.00 - $5.00** Sunset Admission $4.00 - $10.00** (Per vehicle, one hour before closing) Florida National Guard Admission One-half of base (Active members, spouses, and minor children; validation required) admission fee** Children, under 6 years of age Free (All parks) Annual Entrance Pass Fee Range $20.00 - $500.00 Individual Annual Entrance Pass $60.00 (Retired U. S. military, honorably discharged veterans, active-duty $45.00 U. S. military and reservists; validation required) Family Annual Entrance Pass $120.00 (maximum of 8 people in a group; only allows up to 2 people at Ellie Schiller Homosassa Springs Wildlife State Park and Weeki Wachee Springs State Park) (Retired U.
    [Show full text]
  • Ballot Title, Summary and Proposed Amendment – Rights of the Wekiva River and Econlockhatchee River Committee
    Ballot Title, Summary and Proposed Amendment – Rights of the Wekiva River and Econlockhatchee River Committee A. Introduction. This Charter amendment would provide for definitions, create natural rights for the waters of Orange County, the right to clean water, a private right of action and standing for citizens of Orange County to enforce these rights and injunctive remedies. The proposed amendment prohibits any governmental agency, non-natural person or corporate entity from intentionally or negligently polluting the Wekiva River and Econlockhatchee Rivers, or any other Waters within Orange County. B. Ballot Proposal: The ballot title and question for Question #__ are as follows: PROHIBITING POLLUTION OF THE WEKIVA AND ECONLOCKHATCHEE RIVERS OR OTHER WATERS OF ORANGE COUNTY Amending the charter by providing charter protections for the natural rights of the Wekiva and Econlockhatchee Rivers or other Waters of Orange County by prohibiting pollution, providing a definition of Waters, providing a private right of action and standing for citizens of Orange County to enforce these protections against governmental agencies, non-natural persons or corporate entities that intentionally or negligently pollute the Waters, and providing for severability and exceptions. Comptroller estimated financial impact: __________________. _______ Yes ________No C. Text Revisions: Article 7 of the Orange County Charter is amended by adding Section 704.1. (Underline text is added to the charter). Section 704.1 – Right to Clean Water, Standing and Enforcement. A. Natural Rights of Orange County Waters and Citizens. (1) The Wekiva River and Econlockhatchee River, portions of which are within the boundaries of Orange County, and all other Waters within the boundaries of Orange County, have a right to exist and to be protected against Pollution.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Creek Crayfish (Procambarus Pictus) Species Status Assessment
    Black Creek Crayfish (Procambarus pictus) Species Status Assessment Version 1.0 Photo by Christopher Anderson July 2020 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service South Atlantic, Gulf & Mississippi Basin Regions Atlanta, GA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document was prepared by Kathryn N. Smith-Hicks (Texas A&M Natural Resources Institute), Heath Rauschenberger (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [Service]), Lourdes Mena (Service), David Cook (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission [FWC]), and Erin Rivenbark (Service). Other species expertise, guidance, and document reviews were provided by Paul Moler (FWC), Gary Warren (FWC), Lindsey Reisinger (University of Florida), Katherine Lawlor (FWC), Kristi Lee (FWC), and Kasey Fralick (FWC). Additionally, peer reviewers including Troy Keller and Chester R. Figiel, Jr. provided valuable input into the analysis and reviews of a draft of this document. We appreciate their input and comments, which resulted in a more robust status assessment and final report. Suggested reference: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2020. Species status assessment report for Procambarus pictus (Black Creek crayfish), Version 1.0. July 2020. Atlanta, Georgia. ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Black Creek crayfish (Procambarus pictus) are small to medium sized crayfish endemic to four northeastern Florida counties (Clay, Duval, Putnam, and St. Johns) in the Lower St. Johns River Basin. Black Creek crayfish rely on cool, flowing, sand-bottomed, and tannic-stained streams that are highly oxygenated. Locations that fulfill the species’ habitat requirements are typically headwater sections of streams that maintain a constant flow; however, they are found in small and large tributary streams. Within these streams, Black Creek crayfish require aquatic vegetation and debris for shelter with alternation of shaded and open canopy cover where they eat aquatic plants, dead plant and animal material, and detritus.
    [Show full text]
  • Wakulla and Sally Ward Springs
    Wakulla and Sally Ward Springs: Development of Composite Discharge Time Series Technical Memorandum Resource Management Division Bureau of Water Resource Evaluation March 2021 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Wakulla Spring ....................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Estimation of Discharge at Wakulla Spring .................................................................................... 4 2.2 Wakulla Spring Discharge Data Gap Infilling Techniques .............................................................. 5 2.2.1 Manual Discharge Measurements ......................................................................................... 6 2.2.2 USGS Station 02327022, Wakulla River near Crawfordville, Florida ..................................... 8 2.2.3 Wakulla Conduit Well .......................................................................................................... 21 2.3 Wakulla Spring Composite Discharge Time Series ...................................................................... 24 3 Sally Ward Spring ................................................................................................................................. 26 3.1 Estimation of Discharges at Sally Ward ....................................................................................... 27 3.2 Sally
    [Show full text]