DOCSLIB.ORG

Regarding Energy Plant Built in Dandenong South

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regarding Energy Plant Built in Dandenong South From: Sent: Saturday, 7 December 2019 11:02 PM To: works.approvals Subject: Regarding energy plant built in dandenong south. To whom it may concern, My name is and I am a resident in the Somerville estate in keysborough. I am writing to express my concern about a waste Energy plant built so close to residential homes and what impact it would have on the people that lives around there. Firstly, the environment would be affected with possible pollution into the surrounding air, the prudent smell of waste might also be a concern. Secondly, it would affect the environment we are raising our vulnerable children, by products of the energy plant may affect our children's health. In conclusion, may this project be negotiated to be moved to an area with no residential presence. Thank you for your time and assistance. Yours sincerely, 1 From: Sent: Sunday, 8 December 2019 12:40 AM To: works.approvals Subject: Waste-to-energy facility in Dandenong South To whom it may concern, I am writing to express my concern and disapproval regarding the waste-to-energy facility that Great Southern Waste Technologies are trying to get approval to build in Dandenong South. I am a resident of Somerfield Estate in Keysborough and I strongly believe that the location in Ordish Road is not appropriate as it is much too close to residential area. People’s health and well-being should not be put at risk even if those risks are supposedly low as claimed by GSWT. There is far too much unknown with what GSWT is proposing to build and people’s lives should not be gambled with. Other than the location being close to residential, it also backs on to the Eastlink Freeway which is used daily by many people. The fact that the location is only a mere 160 metres away from Dandenong Creek should be enough to put a halt to this facility. Can GSWT prove undeniably that the creek will not get polluted? Maybe not via air emissions but certainly the creek would get polluted by the 24 heavy vehicles coming and going twice daily to the facility. Rubbish has an odd way of falling off trucks/vehicles and being blown by the wind in many different directions. Our earth is already suffering terribly with global warming and pollution. People are currently trying to find and push for more renewable ways of producing energy. Is producing energy by creating and releasing harmful and deadly contaminants really the way to go? I also question whether those from GSWT would themselves be happy living near this kind of facility? I would suspect not. Then there is also the issue of noise pollution and extra traffic that the heavy vehicles would create. Very concerned resident, 1 From: Sent: Monday, 9 December 2019 10:07 AM To: works.approvals Subject: Waste to Energy Plant- Dandenong South Hi Team, I would like to register my strong opposition to the set up of the waste to energy plant at Dandenong South. Although the concept of having waste converted to energy is good, the plant needs to be set up further from residential areas. Dandenong South and Keysborough South are densely populated are and many regions of both these areas have been marked for high density development. The risk to people's health is far significant and control measures are unlikely to mitigate all the risks. I would like the EPA to reject the proposal to set up the plant at 70 Ordish Road, Dandenong South. It should be considered to be set up further away from metropolitan Melbourne area. Regards Resident of Keysborough South 1 From: Sent: Monday, 9 December 2019 10:30 AM To: works.approvals Subject: RE: Waste to energy plant, Dandenong South To EPA, I am a resident living in one of the estates in Keysborough South and I am very concerned about the proposed plan to build a waste to energy plant in Dandenong south as it is 1.5km away from my house.. Please consider reviewing the environmental impact for the proposed waste to energy plant at Dandenong South or plan to build it at location that is at least 5 KM away from residential areas. Thanks and regards, Concerned Keysborough Resident. 1 From: Sent: Monday, 9 December 2019 10:52 AM To: works.approvals Subject: Waste to Energy Plant- Dandenong South Hi Team, I would like to register my strong opposition to the set up of the waste to energy plant at Dandenong South. Although the concept of having waste converted to energy is good, the plant needs to be set up further from residential areas. Dandenong South and Keysborough South are densely populated areas and many regions of both these areas have been marked for high density development with more residential buildings (houses, townhouses and apartments) being built along with childcares and schools! The risk to people's health is far too significant and control measures are unlikely to mitigate all the risks. I would like the EPA to reject the proposal to set up the plant at 70 Ordish Road, Dandenong South. The residents already to smell foul chemical smells time and again due to the proximity of the industrial area and would prefer this waste management facility should be set up further away from metropolitan Melbourne area. Kind Regards Resident of Keysborough South 1 From: Sent: Monday, 9 December 2019 3:25 PM To: works.approvals Subject: Waste to energy plant - objection To whom it my concern. I am hearby objecting to the proposed waste to energy plant in dandenong south based on the following: 1. My family and i live in keysborough and It is absurd to have such a plant emitting pollutants in the air so close to home. It will make our current generation and the future generation, kids,adults and elderly people sick from all the toxic gas. I did not sign up to come live here to have such a bad future health. 2. The noise and constant traffic from the plant will not only be a detriment to the existing traffic problems we have in the area but will also devalue the property we own today which will plummet due to pollution noise, health hazard- no one will want to come live here. 3. It will be a catastrophe if the plant is to have some sort of malfunction and all the toxic gas was to escape and could potentially kill people in an area where lots of population is so close and not enough warning for people to evacuate. I hope this email finds your utmost consideration Please consider the public at large , their safety , their health and wellbeing and stop being greedy for money. Thank you , keysborough resident Get Outlook for iOS 1 From: Sent: Monday, 9 December 2019 3:29 PM To: works.approvals Subject: Objection to waste to energy plant To whom it my concern. I am hearby objecting to the proposed waste to energy plant in dandenong south based on the following: 1. My family and i live in keysborough and It is absurd to have such a plant emitting pollutants in the air so close to home. It will make our current generation and the future generation, kids,adults and elderly people sick from all the toxic gas. I did not sign up to come live here to have such a bad future health. 2. The noise and constant traffic from the plant will not only be a detriment to the existing traffic problems we have in the area but will also devalue the property we own today which will plummet due to pollution noise, health hazard- no one will want to come live here. 3. It will be a catastrophe if the plant is to have some sort of malfunction and all the toxic gas was to escape and could potentially kill people in an area where lots of population is so close and not enough warning for people to evacuate. I hope this email finds your utmost consideration Please consider the public at large , their safety , their health and wellbeing and stop being greedy for money. Thank you keysborough resident Get Outlook for iOS 1 From: Sent: Monday, 9 December 2019 4:45 PM To: works.approvals Subject: Waste-to-energy facility in Dandenong South To whom it may concern: Regarding the Waste-to-energy facility in Dandenong South, out of the 3 methods to process waste using burning, incineration is by far the worst for the surrounding environment. This method is usually used in developing countries. Very harmful gases are produced as a byproduct of the process. Depending on how the wind blows these gases can travel in any direction. The incineration process leaves lots of ashes that should be dumped in a landfill. This ash is like nuclear waste, with the presence of heavy metals in it. so if this ash gets dumped at the proposed landfill, that would be another disaster waiting to happen in the future. The exclusion zone of 1.5 km must not have anything, no houses, no businesses, no industries etc. Also note harmful gases will reach far beyond this exclusion zone. The general waste would've to be dumped in to an open setting before conveyed into the incinerator. The open dumpster will never be cleaned fully and can accumulate both biological and chemical nasties. this incinerator was to be built alongside the Australian paper factory in Traralgon to produce electricity for their operations. And the ash could be tried to a landfill somewhere nearby that is not close to people.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Environment Protection Act 1970 Section 20B Conference Report
    Environment Protection Act 1970 Section 20B Conference Report Application: Development of a waste-to-energy facility at 70 Ordish Road, Dandenong South Applicant: Great Southern Waste Technologies Pty Ltd Produced for Conference Date: Tuesday 3rd March 2020 Conference Chair: Jennifer Lilburn Declaration Limitations of Use I am the Chairperson appointed under Section 20B of the This report has been prepared for EPA Victoria’s consideration as Environment Protection Act 1970 to preside over a consultation part of its assessment of the Works Approval Application by Great conference relating to a Works Approval Application by Great Southern Waste Technologies Pty Ltd. The author has included Southern Waste Technologies Pty Ltd for the construction of a new reflections and recommendations that represent an impartial, non- abattoir at 70 Ordish Road, Dandenong South. I hereby submit my expert view, based on the comments made by community members report to the Environment Protection Authority as required under at the Section 20B Conference held in Dandenong on 3 March 2020. the provisions of the Act. Considerable effort has been made to ensure that the report accurately reflects the discussions that took place at the 20B Conference. However, the feedback by its nature is subjective and not always consistent. It cannot necessarily be construed to be an accurate reflection of the weight of broader community or Jennifer Lilburn stakeholder opinion. No formal statistical analysis of data has been Director Kismet Forward undertaken. March 2020 No responsibility or liability can be taken for errors or omissions, or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party.
    [Show full text]
  • 21 Municipal Strategic Statement 21.01 Municipal
    LOCAL PROVISION GREATER DANDENONG PLANNING SCHEME 21 MUNICIPAL STRATEGIC STATEMENT 21.01 MUNICIPAL PROFILE 21.01-1 Overview The City of Greater Dandenong acknowledges the Kulin Nation people as the traditional custodians of land on which the City is located. The City of Greater Dandenong was established on 15 December 1994 by the merger of the former City of Dandenong, approximately seventy percent of the former City of Springvale and small parts of the former Cities of Berwick and Cranbourne. The City occupies 129.6 square kilometres and its centre is approximately thirty kilometres east of the Melbourne Central Activities District (CAD). It includes the suburbs of Dandenong, Dandenong North, Dandenong South, Springvale, Springvale South, Noble Park, Keysborough, Lyndhurst and Bangholme. The population is rapidly ageing and was estimated at 130,941 in 1997, with a projected decline to 128,028 in 2011. Fourteen percent of families are sole-parent. Greater Dandenong has an extremely culturally diverse population with 137 different nationalities represented, of which forty-six percent were born overseas. Thirty-eight percent are from non-English speaking backgrounds. The most significant ethnic grouping is the Asian-born population, which is one of the highest concentrations in metropolitan Melbourne. Migration patterns reflect areas of global conflict and world “hot spots”. Incomes in Greater Dandenong are characteristically low compared with metropolitan Melbourne. Unemployment has traditionally exceeded regional and State levels by three to four percent although there has been a decline in unemployment rates in recent years. The labour force is relatively low skilled, with sixty-seven percent of the population without tertiary qualifications.
    [Show full text]
  • Sixty-Sixth Annual Report
    VICTORIA COUNTRY ROADS BOARD Sixty-sixth Annual Report For the year ended 30 June 1979 Presented to Both Houses of Parliament Pursuant to Act No. 6229 MELBOURNE F. D. ATKINSON, GOVERNMENT PRINTER 1979 No. 45 f 60 Denmark Street, Kew 3101 28th September, 1979 The Honorable Robert Maclellan, MLA Minister of Transport 570 Bourke Street. Melbourne 3000 Sir In accordance with the requirements of Section 128 of the Country Roads Act 1958 No. 6229, the Board submits to you for presentation to Parliament the report of its proceedings for the year ended 30th June, 1979. The Board wishes to thank the Government for the support and interest in its activities and wishes to place on record its appreciation of the continued co-operation and assistance of State Ministers, Government departments, State instrumentalities and municipal councils. The Board also pays tribute to the continued loyal co-operation and work done by its staff and employees throughout the year. Yours faithfully T H Russell MEngSc (Hons.), BCE (Hons.), DipCE, FIEAust. Chairman WSBrake BCE, CE, M lE Aust. Deputy Chairman N LAIIanson AASA (Senior}, JP Member G KCox LLB, JP Secretary I' "t Country Roads Board Victoria Sixty-sixth Annual Report for year ended 30th June, 1979 Presented to both Houses of Parliament pursuant to Act No. 6229 The CRB is the State Road Authority of Victoria. The CRB's aim is to create an efficient road system within the context • of the overall transportation needs of the community. There are about 160,000 km of public roads in Victoria, of which 23,706 km comprise the CRB's network of the State's principal roads.
    [Show full text]
  • VCH Annreport FA.Qxd
    ANNUAL REPORT 2001–2002 VISION VicHealth’s vision is of a community where: health is valued as a primary resource for living; responsibility for creating conditions which support good health is shared across different sectors; and improved health outcomes are shared equally across the community. MISSION VicHealth’s mission is to build the capabilities of organisations, com- munities and individuals in ways that: change social, economic and physical environments so they improve health for all Victorians; and strengthen the understanding and the skills of individuals in ways that support their efforts to achieve and maintain health. The Victorian Health Promotion Foundation is an organisation committed to promoting the health of all Victorians. 2001-2002 ANNUAL REPORT VicHealth’s strategic directions list five anticipated outcomes by 2002: Recognised as a leader in health promotion innovation Demonstrable contribution to population health Greater investment in population groups most in need Shared responsibility for health across settings and sectors Innovative organisation The 2001-2002 Annual Report highlights activities that represent VicHealth’s efforts during the year towards achieving these aims. Cover Image: Young people are a key target group for VicHealth VicHealth Annual Report 2001–2002 CHAIR’S REPORT VICHEALTH BOARD CEO’S REPORT INVESTMENTS AT A OF GOVERNANCE GLANCE 2001–2002 02 04 06 08 15 YEARS OF VICHEALTH CASE STUDIES 2001 VICHEALTH AWARDS PRESENTATIONS 1987–2002 AND ARTICLES 10 12 32 33 PROJECT SUMMARIES VICHEALTH REPORT OF VICHEALTH FINANCIAL ORGANISATIONAL CHART VICHEALTH INVESTMENTS OPERATIONS 2001–2002 STATEMENTS 2001–2002 2001–2002 34 57 61 78 www.vichealth.vic.gov.au 1 CHAIR’S REPORT We are in the final year of the current strategic plan, and the summer agenda for board and staff is to reflect on its successes and weaknesses, and to craft the next strategic plan on the back of this analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • SCG Victorian Councils Post Amalgamation
    Analysis of Victorian Councils Post Amalgamation September 2019 spence-consulting.com Spence Consulting 2 Analysis of Victorian Councils Post Amalgamation Analysis by Gavin Mahoney, September 2019 It’s been over 20 years since the historic Victorian Council amalgamations that saw the sacking of 1600 elected Councillors, the elimination of 210 Councils and the creation of 78 new Councils through an amalgamation process with each new entity being governed by State appointed Commissioners. The Borough of Queenscliffe went through the process unchanged and the Rural City of Benalla and the Shire of Mansfield after initially being amalgamated into the Shire of Delatite came into existence in 2002. A new City of Sunbury was proposed to be created from part of the City of Hume after the 2016 Council elections, but this was abandoned by the Victorian Government in October 2015. The amalgamation process and in particular the sacking of a democratically elected Council was referred to by some as revolutionary whilst regarded as a massacre by others. On the sacking of the Melbourne City Council, Cr Tim Costello, Mayor of St Kilda in 1993 said “ I personally think it’s a drastic and savage thing to sack a democratically elected Council. Before any such move is undertaken, there should be questions asked of what the real point of sacking them is”. Whilst Cr Liana Thompson Mayor of Port Melbourne at the time logically observed that “As an immutable principle, local government should be democratic like other forms of government and, therefore the State Government should not be able to dismiss any local Council without a ratepayers’ referendum.
    [Show full text]
  • Building New Communities
    OUTER SUBURBAN/INTERFACE SERVICES AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE BUILDING NEW COMMUNITIES Ordered to be Printed By Authority Government Printer for the State of Victoria July 2006 No 218 of Session 2003-2006 Inquiry into Building New Communities The Committee records its appreciation to all who have contributed to the Inquiry and the preparation of this report. A number of individuals made their expertise available through the submission process, at the Committee’s briefings, public hearings and during site visits; they are listed in the Appendices. The cover was designed by Mono Design with the image supplied by The Selection Partnership, UK. Printing was by TDC3. The report was prepared by the Committee’s Research Officer, Mr Keir Delaney and the Committee’s Executive Officer, Mr Sean Coley. Administrative support and research assistance was provided by Ms Natalie- Mai Holmes, with the research program under the direction of Mr Coley. Outer Suburban/Interface Services and Development Committee (2006) Inquiry into Building New Communities ISBN: 0-9751825-5-2 Cover Image Courtesy of The Selection Partnership, UK Cover Design: Mono Design Outer Suburban/Interface Services and Development Committee Level 3, 157 Spring Street Melbourne, Victoria 3000 Phone: (03) 9651 8387 Fax: (03) 9651 8323 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/osisdc TABLE OF CONTENTS OUTER SUBURBAN/INTERFACE SERVICES AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP - 55TH PARLIAMENT ....................................................................VII
    [Show full text]
  • City of Dandenong Bush Land Reserves
    CITY OF DANDENONG BUSH LAND RESERVES Client: City of Greater Dandenong Location: Fotheringham Reserve, Dandenong, Victoria, Australia Scope: Design, illustration, writing, artwork, production, installation Team: Mike Heine, Steve Jones, Larni Williams Year: 2016 OVERVIEW THE SOLUTION The City of Greater Dandenong is home to numerous HeineJones designed an interpretive solution is simple, bush land reserves, many of which contain significant robust, and, like the surrounding bush land – unique remnant native bush land, and all of which are important and individual. Reclaimed iron bark timber posts with for recreation, conservation and cultural heritage natural edges are cut at a compound angle – creating reasons. distinctive angular top surface planes – no two of which are alike. Vitreous enamel top disks are then built to THE CHALLENGE precisely match the shape of the top plane, coated in a The city’s bush land areas, and their importance, base colour sympathetic to the bush land environment, have been poorly understood by the public – and in and printed with simple black and white text and turn undervalued. The City of Greater Dandenong illustrations. The timber posts are installed directly into required an interpretive solution which would reveal the the ground without concrete – ensuring minimal site significance of the reserves to the public; engender a impact and maximum sustainability. The angular top connection to place; fit appropriately into the natural plane, colour palette and natural weathered surface of bush land environment; be robust, long lasting and the reclaimed timber blend comfortably with the natural economical; and minimise soil disturbance during environment. Materiality ensures a long lasting solution.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Dandenong Planning Scheme Amendment C87 Panel Report: July 2008
    GREATER DANDENONG PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C87 PANEL REPORT JULY 2008 GREATER DANDENONG PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C87 PANEL REPORT Cathie McRobert, Chair Robin Saunders, Member Chris McNeil, Member July 2008 Contents OVERALL CONCLUSIONS AND CONSOLIDATED RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................. 5 Overall Conclusions........................................................................................................... 5 Consolidated Recommendations................................................................................... 10 1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................. 16 1.1 The Area ................................................................................................................... 17 1.2 Thompsons Road Retarding Basin........................................................................ 21 1.2.1 Background to the Proposal - Amendment C67............................................ 21 2. IS EXPANSION OF THE DANDENONG SOUTH INDUSTRIAL AREA STRATEGICALLY JUSTIFIED? ............................................................. 22 2.1 Discussion................................................................................................................. 22 2.1.1 Recognition of Potential for an Inland Port .................................................. 26 2.1.2 The Sita Site .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ileen Macpherson: Life and Tragedy of a Pioneer of Biodynamic Farming at Demeter Farm and a Benefactor of Anthroposophy in Australia John Paull
    Ileen Macpherson: Life and tragedy of a pioneer of biodynamic farming at Demeter Farm and a benefactor of Anthroposophy in Australia John Paull To cite this version: John Paull. Ileen Macpherson: Life and tragedy of a pioneer of biodynamic farming at Demeter Farm and a benefactor of Anthroposophy in Australia. Journal of Organics, 2017, 4 (1), pp.29-56. hal-01494792 HAL Id: hal-01494792 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01494792 Submitted on 24 Mar 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License Journal of Organics, 4(1), 2017 Ileen Macpherson: Life and tragedy of a pioneer of biodynamic farming at Demeter Farm and a benefactor of Anthroposophy in Australia John Paull School of Land & Food, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia [email protected], [email protected] “Ileen Macpherson accepted the impulse to assist in a venture for applying Bio-Dynamic methods and resolved with Ernesto Genoni to attempt a practical activity. A small farm was purchased on Princes Highway near Dandenong, approximately 18 miles from Melbourne, and a serious effort which lasted 18 years was attempted.
    [Show full text]
  • Iing Policies for the Melbourne Metropolitan Region Plan & Epa Library
    IING POLICIES FOR THE MELBOURNE METROPOLITAN REGION PLAN & EPA LIBRARY M0026673 MINISTRY FOR PLANNING AfJD ENVIRONMENT LIBRARY PLANNING POLICIES FOR THE MELBOURNE METROPOLITAN REGION NOVEMBER 1971 711.4099 731770 451 MEL:M Planning policies for the (1971) Melbourne metropolitan region MELBOURNE AND METROPOLITAN BOARD OF WORKS Chairman of the Board: A. H. Croxford, L.L.B. Honorary Commissioners (as at 14th September, 1971) R. Bassett, M.B.E., J.P. (City of Footscray) T. H. King (City of Malvern) A. E. Beckett, J.P. (City of Sandringham) G. F. Knowles, J.P. (Shire of Cranbourne) E. W. Best, C.M.G., J.P. (City of Melbourne) A. C. Laing, M.Sc, A.O.S.M. (City of Heidelberg) W. G. Boundy, J.P. (City of Camberwell) J. D. Langdon, J.P. (City of Richmond) G. R. Bricker, J.P. (City of Moorabbin) F. W. Le Page (City of Moorabbin) H. W. Cousins, I.S.M., J.P. (City of Essendon) E. O. Lundgren, J.P. (City of Box Hill) A. P. Donnelly, J.P. (City of Oakleigh) K. C. Marriott, J.P. (City of Springvale) G. C. Dreverman, J.P. (Shire of Eltham) L. W. Mason (City of Brighton) J. C. Duggan, J.P. (City of St. Kilda) V. R. Michael, J.P. (Shire of Whittlesea) D. W. Dumbrell (Shire of Bulla) K. E. Miller, J.P. (City of Dandenong) Sir Bernard Evans, Kt., D.S.O., E.D., F.R.A.I.A. (City of K. G. Mitchell (City of Broadmeadows) Melbourne) I. A. McNab (City of Keilor) M.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Housing Demand in Victoria by Region
    Public housing demand in Victoria by region Dr Duncan Rouch 3 September 2020 Demolition of public housing at Dunlop Avenue in the Ascot Vale Estate, 2020. The public housing waiting list in Victoria has continued to rise despite serial promises by the government to build more. By 31 August it is estimated that there were over 100,000 people waiting for safe and secure housing, consisting of 70,532 adults and 29,995 children. While the waiting list is rising the government has arranged demolishing of public housing at Dunlop Avenue, without a plan to rebuild, when it would have been better to renovate the then existing housing. 1 Summary • Public housing demand in general o Public housing demand, especially for priority access, by disadvantaged households, has continued to increase since the start of the Victorian Housing Register in September 2016 (Table 1a). o The waiting list of applications by disadvantaged households has continued to rise to a new peak of 45,698 in June 2020. o The average annual increase in numbers of applications since September 2016 is 3,489 (standard deviation 1,916). o These continuing increases have occurred despite various promises by the government to build more public and community housing. o The demand for priority access has increased faster than population growth, current at 1.46% of applicant people per capita, that is, over 1 in 100 of the population in the State of Victoria require public housing (Table 1b). • Number of people on housing waiting list o The average number of people per household in public housing was estimated as 2.17, Appendix A, based on data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics.
    [Show full text]
  • PARENTZONE SOUTHERN DIRECTORY Term 1, 2017 Information on Groups and Programs Offered by Parentzone and Community Services Across the Southern Region of Melbourne
    PARENTZONE SOUTHERN DIRECTORY Term 1, 2017 Information on groups and programs offered by Parentzone and Community Services across the Southern Region of Melbourne. PARENTZONE SOUTHERN DIRECTORY | Term 1, 2017 Table of contents Overview of Parentzone Term 2 Programs ............................................................................................. 2 PEER Networks, PEG Grants & Parents Building Solutions (formerly POP) Training ............................. 4 Groups and Programs ............................................................................................................................ 7 City of Bayside ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Cardinia Shire ............................................................................................................................................... 14 City Of Casey ................................................................................................................................................ 22 City of Frankston .......................................................................................................................................... 39 City of Glen Eira ............................................................................................................................................ 56 City of Greater Dandenong .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]