Femme Forte in Early Seventeenth-Century France

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Femme Forte in Early Seventeenth-Century France Marika Takanishi Knowles Tricky, Fine, and Trapped: Painting the Femme Forte in Early Seventeenth-Century France Between the late 1620s and late 1640s, the femme femme forte was piqued as a result of the presence forte (strong woman) was a favored subject of a on the royal stage of Marie de Medici, queen of new coterie of French painters working in Paris. France between 1601 and 1610 and then regent for The generic category of the femme forte com- her minor son Louis XIII between 1610 and 1614. prised women from diverse historical and reli- Within the distinctive cultural and social mi- gious backgrounds, including Lucretia, Cleopa- lieus of the Paris of Louis XIII, the femme forte tra, Dido, Portia, Sophonisbe, Esther, Judith, Joan was a subject of profound contemporary rel- of Arc, and Mary Queen of Scots.1 Femmes fortes evance, the representation of which revealed un- were of high birth (Joan of Arc and Judith being comfortable truths about myths of female hero- exceptions) and were distinguished for courage, ism and the seductions of flesh and paint.5 The beauty, and commitment to ideals of family, na- sensational nature of the strong woman’s heroic tion, and noble selfhood.2 For the French painters death interacted in problematic ways with artis- Claude Vignon (1593– 1670), Jacques Blanchard tic techniques, most notably with the use of col- (1600 – 1638), and Simon Vouet (1590 – 1649), the orist manners of painting. When artists working femme forte offered an opportunity to combine in a colorist idiom painted the femme forte, they the female nude with a historical subject.3 For the gave her a body that resonated with contempo- femme forte, however, pictorial representation rary moralists’ condemnation of women’s bodies had the tendency to make her suffering into the as dangerous instruments of seduction. If color- object of the viewer’s sensual delectation. ism was not at issue, other elements of the paint- The femme forte as exemplary type repre- ing’s mise-en-scène, in particular the setting of sented an outgrowth of the ongoing querelle des the bed and the ruelle, could work in similar femmes, the wide-ranging debate, initiated in the ways to ensnare the image of the femme forte in early fifteenth century by Christine de Pisan, re- a network of associations that challenged her ex- garding the merits of women and the role they emplarity. When put into conversation with pe- should play in society.4 Thefemme forte offered riod texts and cultural contexts, paintings of the one answer in the form of its pantheon of female femme forte by Blanchard, Vignon, and Vouet exemplars, none of whom were particularly rel- expose the problematic misalignments between evant to the experience of the average woman, the myth of the exemplary woman and social re- but who provided dramatic and often racy mate- alities specific to the early seventeenth century. rial for literature, art, and theater. Despite its ap- parently pro-woman inclination, the discourse of the femme forte was interlaced with misogyny. I. The Queen Between Allegory and Flesh The narratives of the lives of strong women fix- ated on violent forms of death, in which the In Peter Paul Rubens’ spectacular cycle of paint- woman was simultaneously exalted and annihi- ings illustrating the life of Marie de’ Medici, lated at the same time, bloody endings that ne- Marie cast herself as the latest member of the glected to imagine women’s social role beyond pantheon of femmes fortes.6 Through its per- instances of crisis. In France, interest in the formance of a delicate negotiation between the 92 Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte 82. Band / 2019 conventions of allegory and the representation of historically-specific female bodies, the cycle offers an essential precedent for the represen- tations of the femme forte that would follow.7 Two features are of particular note in Rubens’ contribution to the visual vocabulary of the femme forte. Rubens created a figure for Marie that constantly asserts its importance above and beyond the illustration of historical narratives. In addition, Rubens deployed his bravura color- ist technique in order to invest the female body with sensual appeal. Yet Rubens’ representation of Marie also opens the series to misogynistic readings that align a woman’s voracious appetite for power with her desire for sexual conquest. In the series’ great homage to allegorical figuration, The Happiness of the Regency, Ma- rie is both allegorical and historical at once (fig. 1). Her figure subsumes generic distinctions into its charismatic singularity. She sits on her throne, holding the scales of justice in one hand, the other hand resting on a globe. Even in this highly-populated composition, Rubens’ Marie 1 Peter Paul Rubens, The Happiness of the Regency, 1622 – 1625, seems to be alone with herself, her monopoly of oil on canvas, 394 × 295 cm. Paris, Musée du Louvre power expressed in the way her body seems to both generate and receive the composition’s di- rectional vectors. The line of the metal bar from of pink and white, with shadows darkening into which the scales of justice are suspended points blue, green, and vermillion, along with black. outward from her figure only to indicate figures The result was the appearance of smooth, pliable that look back towards Marie, their gazes follow- human flesh. This is the real breast that nursed ing the line of the scales. The bar of the scales the king, or, since Marie, like all aristocratic also points to Marie’s exposed breast, the sign of women, used a wet nurse, the breast serves as a her maternity as well as an allegorical represen- metonymic representation of the real body that tation of fecundity. The festoons of bulging fruits bore the king.8 Undoubtedly, Marie also desired above Marie’s head, in particular the lemon with the exposed breast to evoke a comparison with its nipple-like protrusion, and the fruits falling the Virgin Mary, another woman who combined from Plenty’s basket compose the allegorical reg- the historical realities of motherhood with ex- ister to which Marie’s exposed breast belongs. panded allegorical and religious significance.9 Through his application of oil paint, however, Marie may have welcomed this reminder of Rubens emphasizes the specific material char- her life as a physical body – her embodied exis- acteristics of Marie’s breast, which dampens the tence. She was canny enough to recognize that allegorical impact. For the representation of Ma- she owed a large part of her power to the suc- rie’s bare skin, Rubens used bluish underpaint- cessful functioning of her reproductive system, ing beneath the flesh tones, liquid top-strokes which had produced two male heirs to the throne Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte 82. Band / 2019 93 within a few years of marriage.10 However, Ma- tious discourse that cast this body as alternatively rie’s representation as embodied also yielded fecund, nourishing, terrifyingly tempting, and other, less positive readings, as Geraldine John- castrating. While Marie wanted to show that her son has shown.11 In general, period commenta- life and her achievements had already raised her tors did not regard a woman’s display of her body into the sphere of the femme forte, the vivid il- as a sign of healthful fertility, but rather as an lustration of her material incarnation aligned indication of concupiscence and lubricity. Dur- her figure with less elevated readings of female ing the early seventeenth century, in a continua- power. As Johnson suggests, if we read Marie’s tion of the ongoing querelle des femmes, numer- exposed breast according to period prejudice, ous publications sought to analyze, condemn, perhaps Marie displayed her body with the spe- or defend female nature and behavior.12 Pierre cific intent of distracting, disturbing, or ‘tricking’ Juvernay, in a widely read anti-woman diatribe, male viewers, including the statesmen who gazed Discours particuliers contre les femmes desbrail- at Rubens’ cycle while waiting to be granted an lées de ce temps, devoted an entire treatise to a audience.19 In this reading, certain paintings in condemnation of women who wore their dresses the cycle function as tricky traps, snares for male cut too low and showed their breasts (desbrail- desire baited by a woman’s exposed body part. lées). Juvernay attributed all of society’s ills, from Other, more positive readings were of course ordinary sins to wars, plagues, and famines, to possible, but however Rubens, or Marie, intended “this cursed nudity of the female breast”.13 As for the cycle to be read, the polemics surrounding the argument went, women exposed their bod- women made possible a wide variety of runaway ies in order to arouse male desire, which satisfied readings, many of which expressed traditional women’s insatiable vanity as well as their rag- fears of “women on top”.20 ing sex drive.14 In consequence, women’s bodies In the Medici cycle, Rubens explored the endangered the proper functioning of society. themes of the femme forte in the context of a Under the sway of physical passion, men made large-scale decorative ensemble. Other deco- bad decisions, which led to disorder.15 If men rative cycles also celebrated the femme forte in are expected to do their part and restrain their seventeenth-century France, but the trickiest impulses, women are cautioned against attempt- themes of Rubens’ cycle would manifest in the ing to arouse male passion.16 Unfortunately, as a relatively new (to France) medium of small-scale moralist like Jacques du Bosc indicated, women, easel paintings on canvas, intended for a col- because they are vain and concupiscent, are lector’s cabinet.21 The easel painting supposed a prone to debauchery.17 more intimate mode of viewership and encour- Arguments such as these, disseminated in aged prolonged contemplation of a single gesture.
Recommended publications
  • Of Painting and Seventeenth-Century
    Concerning the 'Mechanical' Parts of Painting and the Artistic Culture of Seventeenth-CenturyFrance Donald Posner "La representation qui se fait d'un corps en trassant making pictures is "mechanical" in nature. He understood simplement des lignes, ou en meslant des couleurs, est proportion, color, and perspective to be mere instruments in consider6e comme un travail m6canique." the service of the painter's noble science, and pictorial --Andre F61ibien, Confirences de l'Acadimie Royale de Pezn- elements such as the character of draftsmanship or of the ture et de Sculpture, Paris, 1668, preface (n.p.). application of paint to canvas did not in his view even warrant notice-as if they were of no more consequence in les Connoisseurs, ... avoir veus "... apr6s [les Tableaux] judging the final product than the handwriting of an author d'une distance s'en en raisonnable, veiiillent approcher setting out the arguments of a philosophical treatise.3 Paint- suite pour en voir l'artifice." ers who devoted their best efforts to the "mechanics of the de Conversations sur connoissance de la -Roger Piles, la art" were, he declared, nothing more than craftsmen, and 300. peinture, Paris, 1677, people who admired them were ignorant.4 Judging from Chambray's text, there were a good many A of Champion French Classicism and His Discontents ignorant people in France, people who, in his view seduced ca. 1660 by false fashion, actually valued the display of mere craftsman- In Roland Freart de his 1662 Chambray published IdMede la ship. Chambray expresses special
    [Show full text]
  • In Pursuit of Caravaggio
    IN PURSUIT OF CARAVAGGIO 21 November 2016 – 27 January 2017 38 Dover Street, W1S 4NL, London Robilant+Voena are pleased to present In Pursuit of Caravaggio at their London gallery from 21 November 2016 to 27 January 2017. Robilant+Voena is the premier international gallery for the Caravaggesque, paintings by the European artists who flocked to Rome around 1600 and fuelled an artistic revolution instigated by Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio (1573-1610). Timed to coincide with the National Gallery of Art’s exhibition Beyond Caravaggio, In Pursuit of Caravaggio is an exhibition which will display an exceptional group of Caravaggesque paintings as a vehicle to explore the profound way that art dealers have informed and influenced the reception of the controversial art of Caravaggio and his followers. The years proceeding Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio’s (1573-1610) arrival in Rome in the late summer of 1592 were transformative in the history of western art. Caravaggio landed in the Eternal City and both scandalised and delighted artistic patrons with his brutally naturalist style. His manner was revolutionary and stood counter to the classical idealism of traditional Roman painters. His influence was profound and he quickly garnered a following of both artists and patrons. So when Caravaggio, at the height of his fame, left Rome in 1606, his insistence not to take pupils or to run an organised workshop left no obvious successor to fill the extraordinary demand for commissions. But Rome was filled with artists who were inspired by Caravaggio’s methods. These artists adopted the tenets of Caravaggio’s art (a realistic depiction of figures, dramatic subject matter, and use of chiaroscuro, a high contrast of light to dark) and gave birth to one of the most expressive and beautiful artistic movements of all time.
    [Show full text]
  • Morganhallguide-Print.Pdf
    SOUTH WALL NORTH WALL 1 William Heysham Overend 8 Emanuel de Witte 15 Cigoli (Ludovico Cardi) 22 Jacob Pynas 28 Sir Thomas Lawrence 35 Claude Vignon and Studio 1 Emanuel Gottlieb Leutze 8 Unidentified Artist 15 Cristóbal Villalpando 20 Constance Mayer 26 John Trumbull 32 Carlo Dolci English, 1851–1898 Dutch, 1617 – 1692 Italian, Florence, 1559 – 1613 Dutch, c. 1590 – c.1648 English, 1769 – 1830 French, 1593 – 1670 German, active in America, Italian, Bologna Mexican, 1649 – 1714 (Marie–Françoise–Constance American, 1756 – 1843 Italian, Florence, 1616 – 1686 An August Morning with The New Fish Market in Adoration of the Shepherds, The Adoration of the Magi, 1617 Lady St. John as “Hebe,” c. 1808 Banquet of Anthony and 1816 – 1868 Fantastic Architectural The Archangel Michael, c. 1700 La Martinière) The Death of General Warren Christ Child with Flowers, Farragut; The Battle of Mobile Amsterdam, 1678 c. 1602 Oil on copper Oil on canvas Cleopatra, c. 1630 The Storming of the Teocalli by Perspective, c. 1730–40 Oil on canvas French, 1775 – 1821 at the Battle of Bunker’s Hill, c. 1670s Bay, August 5, 1864, 1883 Oil on canvas Oil on canvas The Ella Gallup Sumner and Mary Catlin Gift in memory of Mae Cadwell Oil on panel Cortez and His Troops, 1848 Oil on canvas The Ella Gallup Sumner and Mary Catlin Self–Portrait of the Artist with June 17, 1775, 1834 Oil on canvas Oil on canvas The Ella Gallup Sumner and Mary Catlin The Douglas Tracy Smith and Dorothy Sumner Collection Fund, 1959.103 Rovensky, 1961.194 The Ella Gallup Sumner and Mary Catlin Oil
    [Show full text]
  • Notice Biographique : French Painter and Draughtsman
    Musée des Beaux-arts de Nancy 274 L'Amour qui se venge Auteur Vouet Simon ; Nom : Vouet Prénom : Simon Lieu de naissance : Paris Date de naissance : 1590 Lieu de décès : Paris Date de décès : 1649 Notice biographique : French painter and draughtsman. Although at the time regarded as one of the leading French painters of the first half of the 17th century, he is now known more for his influence on French painting than for his actual oeuvre. He made his reputation in Italy, where he executed numerous portraits for aristocratic patrons and was commissioned for religious subjects. Although the early Italian works show the influence of Caravaggio, his work was subsequently modified by the Baroque style of such painters as Lanfranco and the influence of the Venetian use of light and colour. When he was summoned back to France by Louis XIII in 1627 he thus brought with him an Italian idiom hitherto unknown in France that revitalized French painting (see France, §III, 3). His style became highly popular among Parisian aristocrats who saw in Vouet a painter capable of decorating their hôtels and châteaux in a manner that would rival the palazzi of their Italian counterparts. He quickly established a large workshop through which passed many of the leading French painters of the mid-17th century. There followed numerous commissions for allegorical works, religious subjects and decorative paintings for royal residences and the burgeoning hôtels and châteaux in and around Paris. The schemes introduced a new type of illusionistic decoration with steep perspective that influenced a generation of decorative painters.
    [Show full text]
  • John Walker, Director of the National Gallery Of
    SIXTH STREET AT CONSTITUTION AVENUE NW WASHINGTON 25 DC • REpublic 7-4215 extension 247 For Release: Sunday papers November 6, 1960 WASHINGTON, D 0 C 0 November 5, 1960: John Walker, Director of the National Gallery of Art, announced today that the most important exhibition of French seventeenth century art ever presented in the United States will open to the public at the Gallery on Thursday, November 10,, The exhibition, entitled THE SPLENDID CENTURY, will be on view in Washington through December 15. 166 masterpieces - paintings, drawings, sculpture and tapes­ tries - the majority of which have never been shown in the United States, have been lent by more than 40 of the provincial museums of France, as well as 4 churches, the Musee du Louvre and the Chateau of Versailles,, The exhibition of THE SPLENDID CENTURY has been organized to illustrate the variety of painting in this great artistic period, which extended from the death of Henry IV in 1610 to the years just after the death of Louis XIV in 1715. It will also show the underlying unity of balance and restraint which appeal to modern taste It is only in the last 30 years s for instance, that the works of Georges de la Tour have suddenly received world acclaim after having been practically forgotten for several centuries, Five paintings by La Tour will be on view, including the famous canvas of The Young Jesus_and St, Joseph in the Carpenter's Shop. (more) - 2 - Six canvases of Nicolas Poussin are included in the exhibition. He is generally conceded to be France's greatest classical painter and the artist whose genius dominates the century.
    [Show full text]
  • Painting As a Form of Communication in Colonial Central Andes
    Painting as a Form of Communication in Colonial Central Andes Variations on the Form of Ornamental Art in Early World Society Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der Kultur- und Sozialwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Luzern vorgelegt von Fernando Valenzuela von Santiago (Chile) Eingereicht am: 7. September 2009 Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Rudolf Stichweh Zweitgutachterin: Prof. Dr. Cornelia Bohn Originaldokument gespeichert auf dem Dokumentserver der ZHB Luzern http://www.zhbluzern.ch Dieses Werk ist unter einem Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Switzerland Lizenzvertrag lizenziert. Um die Lizenz anzusehen, gehen Sie bitte zu http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ch/ oder schicken Sie einen Brief an Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California 94105, USA. Eine Kurzform der in Anspruch genommenen Rechte finden Sie auch auf der nachfolgenden Seite dieses Dokuments. Urheberrechtlicher Hinweis Dieses Dokument steht unter einer Lizenz der Creative Commons Namensnennung-Keine kommerzielle Nutzung-Keine Bearbeitung 2.5 Schweiz http://creativecommons.org/ Sie dürfen: das Werk bzw. den Inhalt vervielfältigen, verbreiten und öffentlich zugänglich machen Zu den folgenden Bedingungen: Namensnennung — Sie müssen den Namen des Autors/Rechteinhabers in der von ihm festgelegten Weise nennen. Keine kommerzielle Nutzung — Dieses Werk bzw. dieser Inhalt darf nicht für kommerzielle Zwecke verwendet werden. Keine Bearbeitung — Dieses Werk bzw. dieser Inhalt darf nicht bearbeitet, abgewandelt oder in anderer Weise verändert werden. Wobei gilt: Verzichtserklärung — Jede der vorgenannten Bedingungen kann aufgehoben werden, sofern Sie die ausdrückliche Einwilligung des Rechteinhabers dazu erhalten. • Public Domain (gemeinfreie oder nicht-schützbare Inhalte) — Soweit das Werk, der Inhalt oder irgendein Teil davon zur Public Domain der jeweiligen Rechtsordnung gehört, wird dieser Status von der Lizenz in keiner Weise berührt.
    [Show full text]
  • A Collector's Eye Cranach to Pissarro
    A Collector’s Eye Cranach to Pissarro 1 A Collector’s Eye 2 1 A Collector’s Eye Cranach to Pissarro First published 2010 by National Museums Liverpool 127 Dale Street Liverpool L2 2JH All images © 2010 David Lewis and family interests Introductory text and catalogue entries © 2010 Christopher Wright The authors’ rights have been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. A British Library CIP record is available. ISBN 978-1-902700-44-1 Designed by Pointing Design Printed and bound by Everbest 2 3 Contents A Collector’s Eye 7 David Lewis Introduction 13 Christopher Wright Catalogue editor Foreword 19 Reyahn King Director of Art Galleries, National Museums Liverpool Catalogue Impressionists 23 15th and 16th Centuries 33 17th Century 77 18th Century 137 19th Century 147 Index 158 4 5 A Collector’s Eye The creation of a private collection is an intensely personal exercise. The objects so gathered would exist whether or not brought together in one ownership. Such a collection may reflect the vanity of the collector, or it may, hopefully, reflect an intellectual curiosity which can to some extent be satiated by the juxtaposition of period, style, subject, medium, artist or creator. This fulfils a subjective desire to learn and appreciate in the comfort and accessibility of one’s own possessions, rather than within the public domain.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin Volume
    Allen Memorial Art Museum Oberlin College Bulletin Volume Number 2 Allen Memorial Art Museum Bulletin Oberlin Volume College XLIX Number 2 1996 3 Charles F. Olney Front Cover Jasper F. Cropsey, and the Collecting of Curiosities Temple of the by Marjorie E. Wieseman Sibyl, Tivoli, 1876, oil on canvas, 43 Charles Olney, Charles Freer, 23.2 x 30.8 cm, Gift of and the History of Asian Art Charles F. Olney, Collecting in America 04.1186. by Charles Q. Mason Back Cover Japanese, Meiji period (1868-1012), 52 Acquisitions 1994-1995 Dragon-Form Incense Burner, bronze, in.8 cm 57 Loans 1994-1995 high, Gift of Charles F. Olney, 59 Museum Staff and Publications 04.723. Published twice a year by the Allen Memorial Art Museum, Oberlin College, Oberlin, Ohio. Back issues available from the Museum. Indexed in the Art Index and abstracted by BHA (Bibliography of the History of Art) and ARTbibliographies. Reproduced on University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Printed by Austin Printing. Copyright © Oberlin College, 1996. ISSN: 0002-5739. Charles F. Olney and the Collecting of Curiosities With perspicacity and intent, during the last Charles Fayette Olney was born in Hartford, quarter of the nineteenth century Charles Fayette Connecticut, on August 27, i83t, and was raised Olney assembled a wealth of art and objects that in the nearby village of Southington (fig. i).1 He not only became the physical beginnings of an was the son of Jesse Olney, a teacher, geographer, art gallery at Oberlin College, but also formed and author of several popular nineteenth-century the conceptual school texts.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Layers in European Painting 1550–1750
    Ground Layers in European Painting 1550–1750 CATS Proceedings, V, 2019 Edited by Anne Haack Christensen, Angela Jager and Joyce H. Townsend GROUND LAYERS IN EUROPEAN PAINTING 1550–1750 GROUND LAYERS IN EUROPEAN PAINTING 1550–1750 CATS Proceedings, V, 2019 Edited by Anne Haack Christensen, Angela Jager and Joyce H. Townsend Archetype Publications www.archetype.co.uk in association with First published 2020 by Archetype Publications Ltd in association with CATS, Copenhagen Archetype Publications Ltd c/o International Academic Projects 1 Birdcage Walk London SW1H 9JJ www.archetype.co.uk © 2020 CATS, Copenhagen The Centre for Art Technological Studies and Conservation (CATS) was made possible by a substantial donation by the Villum Foundation and the Velux Foundation, and is a collabora- tive research venture between the National Gallery of Denmark (SMK), the National Museum of Denmark (NMD) and the School of Conservation (SoC) at the Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation. ISBN: 978-1-909492-79-0 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publishers. Every effort has been made to trace copyright holders and to obtain their permission for the use of copyright material. The publisher would be pleased to rectify any omissions in future reprints. Front cover illustration: Luca Giordano, The Flight into Egypt, c.1700, oil on canvas, 61.5 × 48.9 cm, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York City, inv.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Master Paintings Wednesday 10 April 2013 at 1Pm Knightsbridge, London Bonhams 1793 Limited Bonhams 1793 Ltd Directors Bonhams UK Ltd Directors Registered No
    Old Master Paintings Wednesday 10 April 2013 at 1pm Knightsbridge, London Bonhams 1793 Limited Bonhams 1793 Ltd Directors Bonhams UK Ltd Directors Registered No. 4326560 Robert Brooks Chairman, Colin Sheaf Deputy Chairman, Colin Sheaf Chairman, Jonathan Baddeley, Antony Bennett, Iain Rushbrook, John Sandon, Tim Schofield, Registered Office: Montpelier Galleries Malcolm Barber Group Managing Director, Matthew Bradbury, Harvey Cammell, Simon Cottle, Veronique Scorer, James Stratton, Roger Tappin, Matthew Girling CEO UK and Europe, Andrew Currie, David Dallas, Paul Davidson, Jean Ghika, Shahin Virani, David Williams, Michael Wynell-Mayow. Montpelier Street, Geoffrey Davies, Jonathan Horwich, James Knight, Charles Graham-Campbell, Miranda Grant, Robin Hereford, London SW7 1HH Patrick Meade, Caroline Oliphant, Hugh Watchorn. Asaph Hyman, Charles Lanning, Camilla Lombardi, +44 (0) 20 7393 3900 Fergus Lyons, Paul Maudsley, Gordon McFarlan, +44 (0) 20 7393 3905 fax Andrew McKenzie, Simon Mitchell, Jeff Muse, Mike Neill, Charlie O’Brien, Giles Peppiatt, Peter Rees, Julian Roup, Old Master Paintings Wednesday 10 April 2013 at 1pm Knightsbridge, London Bonhams Enquiries Customer Services Montpelier Street [email protected] Monday to Friday 8.30am to 6pm Knightsbridge +44 (0) 20 7468 8307 +44 (0) 20 7447 7447 London SW7 1HH www.bonhams.com Specialists Please see back of catalogue Andrew McKenzie for important notice to bidders Viewing +44 (0) 20 7468 8261 Sunday 7 April 11am to 3pm [email protected] Illustrations Monday 8 April 9am
    [Show full text]
  • Dos Lienzos ¿Originales? De Claude Vignon En La Catedral De Pamplona Amaya Alzaga Ruiz José Luis Requena Bravo De Laguna PRÍNCIPE DE VIANA
    2014 Año LXXV Núm. 259 SEPARATA Dos lienzos ¿originales? de Claude Vignon en la catedral de Pamplona Amaya Alzaga Ruiz José Luis Requena Bravo de Laguna PRÍNCIPE DE VIANA SUMARIO ARTE Amaya Alzaga Ruiz / José Luis Requena Bravo de Laguna Dos lienzos ¿originales? de Claude Vignon en la catedral de Pamplona .......... 7 José M.ª Muruzábal del Solar El pintor Eduardo Carceller: contribuciones al estudio de su figura y de su obra ............................................................................................................... 15 Teresa Barrio Fernández La participación de audiencias en museos de arte. Bibliografía general y estu- dio de caso del Museo de Navarra .................................................................. 37 HISTORIA Medieval José María Corella Iráizoz El Colegio de Navarra en París ...................................................................... 65 M.ª Raquel García Arancón La «otra» Blanca de Navarra, una reina entre tres reinos (c. 1248-1302) .......... 113 Juan Jesús Virto Ibáñez El testamento de la reina Blanca de Navarra. La copia de los Archivos de Pau ... 131 Moderna Jesús M.ª Zaratiegui Labiano La propuesta de reforma monetaria del navarro Diego Cruzat (1551) ............ 159 Miguel Ángel Lizaso Tirapu Datos para una biografía del Duende Crítico de Madrid ............................... 185 Contemporánea Francisco Miranda Rubio Navarra en 1813. Nuevos escenarios bélicos y políticos .................................. 239 Fernando Mikelarena Peña Sobre las dudas del Gobierno central acerca
    [Show full text]
  • The Male Gaze and Other Reasons for the Hypothetical End of Christian
    THE ETIENNE GILSON SERIES 26 The Male Gaze and Other Reasons for the Hypothetical End of Christian Art in the West KARL F. MORRISON 5 March 2004 PONTIFICAL INSTITUTE OF MEDIAEVAL STUDIES Karl F. Morrison is Lessing Professor of History and Poetics at Rutgers University. His books include The Mimetic Tradition of Reform in the West (1982), Holiness and Politics in Early Medieval Thought (1985), “I Am You”: The Hermeneutics of Empathy in Western Literature, Theology, and Art (1988), History as a Visual Art in the Twelfth-Century Renaissance (1990), and Understanding Conversion and Conversion and Text (1992). Front cover Detail from Jan Van Bijlert, The Calling of Matthew (ca 1620–1629). Budapest: Museum of Fine Art. The Etienne Gilson Series 26 ISSN 0–708–319X ISBN 0–88844–726–4 © 2005 Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies 59 Queen’s Park Crescent East Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 2C4 PRINTED IN CANADA www.pims.ca begin this talk in a contrite frame of mind. My intention was, and is, to pay tribute to Étienne Gilson (1884–1978), because we are here to honor I him and, speaking for myself, because, with a fragment by Xenophon of Colophon, his writings suggested a connection to my mind between the project of self-knowing and religious art as a kind of mirror that makes it possible for us to see, and know, ourselves. (After all, we cannot see our own faces without some kind of mirror.) However, Gilson’s writings offer little on the subject of medieval art. That is why, incongruously enough, I am offering to the Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies a talk that follows where Gilson’s enthusiasms led, to the Counter-Reformation and its aftermath down to Cubism.
    [Show full text]