DOCSLIB.ORG

Reviewing Turkish Administrative Structure Regarding Terrorism and Ftfs: a Comparative Analysis Ankara 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reviewing Turkish Administrative Structure Regarding Terrorism and Ftfs: a Comparative Analysis Ankara 2019 Bu proje Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye Cumhuriyeti tarafından finanse edilmektedir REVIEWING TURKISH ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE REGARDING TERRORISM AND FTFS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ANKARA 2019 Improving the Effectiveness of Turkish Legal Regulations on Foreign Terrorist Fighters in the Light of Comparative and International Law 1 Reviewing Turkish Administrative Structure Regarding Terrorism and FTFs: A Comparative Analysis Reviewing Turkish Administrative Structure Regarding Terrorism and FTFs: A Comparative Analysis REPORT Ferhat Ercümen Sean Griffin Ankara - TÜRKİYE icare4all © 2019 Bu çalışmaya ait içeriğin telif hakları icare4all’a ait olup, 5846 Sayılı Fikir ve Sanat Eserleri Kanunu uyarınca kaynak gösterilerek kısmen yapılacak makul alıntılar dışında, hiçbir şekilde önceden izin alınmaksızın kullanılamaz, yeniden yayımlanamaz. Bu çalışmada yer alan değerlendirmeler yazarına aittir; icare4all’ın kurumsal görüşünü yansıtmamaktadır. Ortadoğu Araştırmaları Merkezi Adresi : Mustafa Kemal Mah. 2128 Sk. No: 3 Çankaya, ANKARA Telefon: +90 850 888 15 20 Faks: +90 (312) 430 39 48 Email: [email protected] Tasarım: beyzaerden.com Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1 I. THE UNITED STATES’ COUNTER-TERRORISM STRUCTURE 3 1. THE PRESIDENT, THE NSC AND THE HSC ....................................................................................................... 5 2. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY .................................................................................................... 7 2.1. US Secret Service (USSS) ...................................................................................................................................... 10 2.2. US Coast Guard (USCG) ....................................................................................................................................... 10 2.3. Cyber Security and Infrastructure Agency (CISA) ................................................................................... 11 2.4. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) .................................................................................... 12 2.5. US Customs and Border Protection (USCBP) ............................................................................................ 12 2.6. Transportation Security Administration (TSA) ........................................................................................... 14 2.7. Office of Information and Analysis (OIA) ....................................................................................................... 15 3. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE (DOD) ................................................................................................................... 16 4. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (DOJ) ........................................................................................................................ 18 4.1. US Marshals Service (USMS) .............................................................................................................................. 19 4.2. National Security Division (NSD) ...................................................................................................................... 19 4.3. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) ............................................................................................................. 20 5. DEPARTMENT OF TREAUSRY ................................................................................................................................. 22 6. US INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY ........................................................................................................................ 23 6.1. Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) .......................................................................... 24 6.1.1. National Counter-terrorism Centre (NCTC) ...................................................................................... 25 6.2. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) ..................................................................................................................... 25 7. DEPARTMENT OF STATE ........................................................................................................................................... 28 Reviewing Turkish Administrative Structure Regarding Terrorism and FTFs: A Comparative Analysis II. THE COUNTER-TERRORISM STRUCTURE OF THE UNITED KINGDOM..................................... 29 1. HOME OFFICE (HO) .................................................................................................................................................. 30 1.1. Minister of State for Immigration ................................................................................................................... 31 1.2. Minister of State for Security and Economic Crime .............................................................................. 31 1.3. Minister of State for Policing and the Fire Service ................................................................................. 32 1.4. The Minister for Countering Extremism .................................................................................................... 32 1.5. Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Crime, Safeguarding and Vulnerability ........... 33 1.5.1. National Crime Agency (NCA) ................................................................................................................. 33 1.6. Office for Security and Counter-Terrorism (OSCT) .............................................................................. 34 2. MINISTRY OF DEFENCE ......................................................................................................................................... 35 2.1. Her Majesty’s TREASURY ................................................................................................................................. 37 3. LAW ENFORCEMENT IN THE UK ...................................................................................................................... 38 3.1. Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) ............................................................................................................... 39 3.2. Coordination Between Law Enforcement Agencies ............................................................................. 39 4. UK INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY .................................................................................................................... 41 4.1. The Security Service (MI5) ................................................................................................................................ 41 4.2. The Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) .......................................................................................................... 43 4.3. Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) ...................................................................... 43 4.4. Defence Intelligence (DI) ................................................................................................................................... 44 4.5. Joint Intelligence Organisation (JIO) ........................................................................................................... 44 III. COUNTER-TERRORISM STRUCTURE OF GERMANY ............................................................................ 45 1. Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community (BMI) ............................................................................ 47 1.1. Effects of September 11 ..................................................................................................................................... 48 2. LAW ENFORCEMENT ............................................................................................................................................... 49 2.1. Federal Law Enforcement Forces .................................................................................................................. 50 2.2. State Law Enforcement Forces .......................................................................................................................... 51 3. INTELLIGENCE ................................................................................................................................................................. 52 3.1. Federal Intelligence Service (BND) .................................................................................................................. 52 3.2. Military Counter Intelligence Service (MAD) ............................................................................................. 52 3.3. Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV) ................................................................ 53 4. COUNTERING EXTREMISM AND RADICALISATION ............................................................................... 54 5. COUNTER-TERRORISM COORDINATION AND COOPERATION ..................................................... 55 IV. COUNTER-TERRORISM STRUCTURE OF FRANCE .................................................................................... 58 1. MINISTRY OF ARMED FORCES .............................................................................................................................. 59 2. MINISTRY OF INTERIOR ............................................................................................................................................ 60 3. LAW ENFORCEMENT IN FRANCE ......................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EU and Member States' Policies and Laws on Persons Suspected Of
    DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT C: CITIZENS’ RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS CIVIL LIBERTIES, JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS EU and Member States’ policies and laws on persons suspected of terrorism- related crimes STUDY Abstract This study, commissioned by the European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs at the request of the European Parliament Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE Committee), presents an overview of the legal and policy framework in the EU and 10 select EU Member States on persons suspected of terrorism-related crimes. The study analyses how Member States define suspects of terrorism- related crimes, what measures are available to state authorities to prevent and investigate such crimes and how information on suspects of terrorism-related crimes is exchanged between Member States. The comparative analysis between the 10 Member States subject to this study, in combination with the examination of relevant EU policy and legislation, leads to the development of key conclusions and recommendations. PE 596.832 EN 1 ABOUT THE PUBLICATION This research paper was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and was commissioned, overseen and published by the Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs. Policy Departments provide independent expertise, both in-house and externally, to support European Parliament committees and other parliamentary bodies in shaping legislation
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Border Management: Indian Coastal and Maritime Security
    Contents Foreword p2/ Preface p3/ Overview p4/ Current initiatives p12/ Challenges and way forward p25/ International examples p28/Sources p32/ Glossary p36/ FICCI Security Department p38 Smart border management: Indian coastal and maritime security September 2017 www.pwc.in Dr Sanjaya Baru Secretary General Foreword 1 FICCI India’s long coastline presents a variety of security challenges including illegal landing of arms and explosives at isolated spots on the coast, infiltration/ex-filtration of anti-national elements, use of the sea and off shore islands for criminal activities, and smuggling of consumer and intermediate goods through sea routes. Absence of physical barriers on the coast and presence of vital industrial and defence installations near the coast also enhance the vulnerability of the coasts to illegal cross-border activities. In addition, the Indian Ocean Region is of strategic importance to India’s security. A substantial part of India’s external trade and energy supplies pass through this region. The security of India’s island territories, in particular, the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, remains an important priority. Drug trafficking, sea-piracy and other clandestine activities such as gun running are emerging as new challenges to security management in the Indian Ocean region. FICCI believes that industry has the technological capability to implement border management solutions. The government could consider exploring integrated solutions provided by industry for strengthening coastal security of the country. The FICCI-PwC report on ‘Smart border management: Indian coastal and maritime security’ highlights the initiatives being taken by the Central and state governments to strengthen coastal security measures in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • DEALING with JIHADISM a Policy Comparison Between the Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, France, the UK and the US (2010 to 2017)
    DEALING WITH JIHADISM A policy comparison between the Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, France, the UK and the US (2010 to 2017) Stef Wittendorp, Roel de Bont, Jeanine de Roy van Zuijdewijn and Edwin Bakker ISGA Report Dealing with jihadism: A policy comparison between the Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, France, the UK, and the US (2010 to 2017) Stef Wittendorp, Roel de Bont, Jeanine de Roy van Zuijdewijn and Edwin Bakker December 2017 (the research was completed in October 2016) ISSN 2452-0551 e-ISSN 2452-056X © 2017, Stef Wittendorp / Roel de Bont / Jeanine de Roy van Zuijdewijn / Edwin Bakker / Leiden University Cover design: Oscar Langley www.oscarlangley.com All rights reserved. Without limiting the right under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without prior permission of both the copyright owners Leiden University and the authors of the book. Table of Contents List with abbreviations................................................................................................ 5 List with tables and figures ....................................................................................... 10 Summary .................................................................................................................. 11 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 13 2
    [Show full text]
  • The French White Paper on Defence and National Security (2008) 3
    FRENCH DEFENCE 2009 Texts and exercises by Philippe Rostaing : 1. French Defence Organization 2. French Defence Policy : the French White Paper on Defence and National Security (2008) 3. The French Army 4. The French Air Force 5. The French Navy 6. The French Gendarmerie 7. Intelligence and the French Intelligence Community Update : March 2009 1 1. French Defence Organization Read this text carefully. You will then be able to do the following exercises : President of the French Republic Prime Minister Defence Minister Armed Forces Chief of Staff Army Chief Air Force Navy Chief Gendarmerie of Staff Chief of of Staff Director- Staff General 1. The Constitution of October 4th,1958, gives the President of the French Republic the position of Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces (Article 15). In his capacity as guarantor of national independence, territorial integrity and treaty compliance (Article 5), he alone may decide to commit nuclear forces. Within specific councils under his authority (the Council of Ministers, the Defence Council), the President defines national defence policies and makes decisions in defence matters. He is responsible for appointing senior civilian and military officials (Article 13). 2. The French government determines and executes national policies and thus may use armed force (Article 20). The Prime Minister has responsibility for national defence. He implements the decisions made by the President and is supported by the General Secretariat for National Defence (SGDN) in charge of interdepartmental defence coordination. 3. The Defence Minister has authority over the Ministry of Defence and executes military defence policies. He reports directly to the Prime Minister.
    [Show full text]
  • 1: Introduction
    Working Papers WP 2018-04 Centre for German and European Studies (CGES) Daria Kuklinskaia Social and political factors of the anti-terrorist legislation development: Cases of the United Kingdom, Germany and Russia WP 2018-04 2018 № 4 Bielefeld / St. Petersburg Working Papers WP 2018-04 Centre for German and European Studies Bielefeld University St. Petersburg State University Centre for German and European Studies (CGES) CGES Working Papers series includes publication of materials prepared within different activities of the Centre for German and European Studies both in St. Petersburg and in Germany. The CGES supports educational programmes, research and scientific dialogues. In accordance with the CGES mission, the Working Papers are dedicated to the interdisciplinary studies of different aspects of German and European societies. The paper is based on an MA thesis defended at the MA 'Studies in European Societies' in June 2018 and supervised by Dr. Elena Belokurova. This paper is dedicated to the analysis of the social and political factors that could have influenced anti-terrorist legislation development (by the examples of the United Kingdom, Germany and Russia). The political factors that were analyzed include the international obligations imposed on the countries by the international conventions and treaties, whereas social factors that were researched are the internal and external shocks and policy-oriented learning processes. The paper also puts a special emphasis on the comparative analysis of the contemporary anti-terrorist legislations in the chosen countries (since the end of 1990s until 2017). Publication of the thesis as a CGES Working Paper was recommended by the Examination Committee as one of the best theses defended by the students of the MA SES in 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Action Plan Against Terrorism
    PREMIER MINISTRE ACTION PLAN AGAINST TERRORISM LutterEurope Menace Entraver Victimes Protéger Jihadisme Cribler r TechnologiesLutter ée Cr er Résilience Terroriste Menace Cribler tt tés aitre Réprimer Résilience Cibles nn Armes Co ili Lu r Comprendre Menace Identifier ée Europe Cibles ComprendreTechnologies aitre Armes nn Explosifs LutterCréer Cr Identifier Co Protéger Identifier Terroriste Entraver Cibles Victimes Coordonner Renforcer Europe Réprimer Réprimer Armes Vulnérab Protéger Contrôler Europe er Cibles r tt ée Créer Victimes Cibles Cr Résilience Réprimer Cibles Technologies ContrôlerLu ArmeCréer s Entraver Entraver er Victimes Victimes tés Cibles Protéger tt ili Europe Lu Menace Identifier Explosifs CriblerCoordonner Comprendre Europe Créer Cibles RadicalisationMenace erroristeenace Vulnérab TerroristeCibles Armes T M 13 July 2018 « Jihadism has not weakened over the last twenty or more years, it has simply moved to new places and taken on new forms. Responses to the threat it poses require mobilisation of all public policies: intelligence, security, justice and diplomacy. It is the State as a whole, and, in addition, all the national community’s living resources – its local authorities, political forces, enterprises and youth – which must mobilise around these challenges. » (Strategic Review of Defence and National Security. 2017). ACTION PLAN AGAINST TERRORISM Contents FRANCE’S SECURITY STRATEGY: TACKLING TERRORISM TOGETHER 5 1 Since 2016, France has continued to face up to a high terrorist threat 7 2 The action plan against
    [Show full text]
  • Hoem Office Ministers' Return Jan-Mar 2011
    HOME OFFICE JANUARY – MARCH 2011 GIFTS GIVEN OVER £140 Rt Hon Theresa May – Home Secretary Date gift From Gift Value given Nil Return Damian Green – Minister for Immigration Date gift From Gift Value given Nil Return Rt Hon Nick Herbert – Minister for Policing and Criminal Justice Date gift From Gift Value given Nil Return 1 Rt Hon Baroness Neville-Jones – Minister for Security and Counter-Terrorism Date gift From Gift Value given Nil Return James Brokenshire – Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Crime Prevention Date gift From Gift Value given Nil Return Lynne Featherstone – Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Equalities and Criminal Information Date gift From Gift Value given Nil Return 2 GIFTS RECEIVED OVER £140 Rt Hon Theresa May – Home Secretary Date gift From Gift Value Outcome received Nil Return Damian Green – Minister for Immigration Date gift From Gift Value Outcome received Nil Return Rt Hon Nick Herbert – Minister for Policing and Criminal Justice Date gift From Gift Value Outcome received Nil Return Rt Hon Baroness Neville-Jones – Minister for Security and Counter-Terrorism Date gift From Gift Value Outcome received Nil Return 3 James Brokenshire – Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Crime Prevention Date gift From Gift Value Outcome received Nil Return Lynne Featherstone – Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Equalities and Criminal Information Date gift From Gift Value Outcome received Nil Return 4 HOSPITALITY1 Rt Hon Theresa May - Home Secretary Date Name of Organisation Type of Hospitality Received
    [Show full text]
  • Wd 3 - 3000 - 016/17
    Wissenschaftliche Dienste Ausarbeitung Parlamentarische Kontrolle der Nachrichtendienste in ausgewählten Staaten Aktualisierung der Ausarbeitung WF III G - 12/06 vom 23. Januar 2006 © 2017 Deutscher Bundestag WD 3 - 3000 - 016/17 Wissenschaftliche Dienste Ausarbeitung Seite 2 WD 3 - 3000 - 016/17 Parlamentarische Kontrolle der Nachrichtendienste in ausgewählten Staaten Aktualisierung der Ausarbeitung WF III G - 12/06 vom 23. Januar 2006 Aktenzeichen: WD 3 - 3000 - 016/17 Abschluss der Arbeit: 12. Mai 2017 Fachbereich: WD 3: Verfassung und Verwaltung Die Wissenschaftlichen Dienste des Deutschen Bundestages unterstützen die Mitglieder des Deutschen Bundestages bei ihrer mandatsbezogenen Tätigkeit. Ihre Arbeiten geben nicht die Auffassung des Deutschen Bundestages, eines seiner Organe oder der Bundestagsverwaltung wieder. Vielmehr liegen sie in der fachlichen Verantwortung der Verfasserinnen und Verfasser sowie der Fachbereichsleitung. Arbeiten der Wissenschaftlichen Dienste geben nur den zum Zeitpunkt der Erstellung des Textes aktuellen Stand wieder und stellen eine individuelle Auftragsarbeit für einen Abgeordneten des Bundestages dar. Die Arbeiten können der Geheimschutzordnung des Bundestages unterliegende, geschützte oder andere nicht zur Veröffentlichung geeignete Informationen enthalten. Eine beabsichtigte Weitergabe oder Veröffentlichung ist vorab dem jeweiligen Fachbereich anzuzeigen und nur mit Angabe der Quelle zulässig. Der Fachbereich berät über die dabei zu berücksichtigenden Fragen. Wissenschaftliche Dienste Ausarbeitung Seite 3 WD 3 - 3000 - 016/17 Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Einleitung 5 2. Dänemark 6 2.1. Überblick über die Nachrichtendienste 6 2.2. Kontrolle der Nachrichtendienste 6 2.2.1. Parlamentarische Kontrolle der Nachrichtendienste 6 2.2.2. Gremium für die Kontrolle der Nachrichtendienste 7 3. Frankreich 7 3.1. Überblick über die Nachrichtendienste 7 3.1.1. Dienst des Innenministeriums 8 3.1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 1 February 2021
    United Nations A/HRC/46/37/Add.2 General Assembly Distr.: General 1 February 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty-sixth session 22 February–19 March 2021 Agenda item 3 Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development Visit to France Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy, Joseph A. Cannataci*, ** Summary The Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy, Joseph A. Cannataci, carried out an official visit to France from 13 to 17 November 2017. In the present report, he highlights concerns about the emergency laws and recommends that French law be reformed further to entrench the oversight powers of the National Commission for the Control of Intelligence Techniques and to bring the safeguards and remedies applicable to foreign intelligence in line with those required for domestic intelligence. * The summary of the report is being circulated in all official languages. The report itself, which is annexed to the summary, is being circulated in the language of submission and French only. ** The present report was submitted after the deadline in order to reflect the most recent information. GE.21-01269(E) A/HRC/46/37/Add.2 Annex Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy, Joseph A. Cannataci, on his visit to France I. Introduction 1. The present report was finalized towards the end of 2020, after an evaluation of the preliminary results of the meetings held during the visit to France from 13 to 17 November 2017 and after having cross-checked those preliminary results against follow-up research and developments to date.
    [Show full text]
  • International Narcotics Control Strategy Report
    United States Department of State Bureau for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs International Narcotics Control Strategy Report Volume II Money Laundering and Financial Crimes March 2014 INCSR 2014 Volume II Common Abbreviations Table of Contents Volume II Common Abbreviations .................................................................................................... iii Legislative Basis for the INCSR ................................................................................... 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 3 Bilateral Activities ......................................................................................................... 4 Training and Technical Assistance ........................................................................................................... 4 Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System ................................................. 5 Department of Homeland Security .............................................................................. 6 Customs and Border Protection ................................................................................................................ 6 Homeland Security Investigations ............................................................................................................ 6 Department of Justice .................................................................................................. 8 Drug Enforcement
    [Show full text]
  • Considering the Creation of a Domestic Intelligence Agency in the United States
    HOMELAND SECURITY PROGRAM and the INTELLIGENCE POLICY CENTER THE ARTS This PDF document was made available CHILD POLICY from www.rand.org as a public service of CIVIL JUSTICE the RAND Corporation. EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit NATIONAL SECURITY research organization providing POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY objective analysis and effective SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY solutions that address the challenges SUBSTANCE ABUSE facing the public and private sectors TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY around the world. TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND Homeland Security Program RAND Intelligence Policy Center View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
    [Show full text]
  • The War and Fashion
    F a s h i o n , S o c i e t y , a n d t h e First World War i ii Fashion, Society, and the First World War International Perspectives E d i t e d b y M a u d e B a s s - K r u e g e r , H a y l e y E d w a r d s - D u j a r d i n , a n d S o p h i e K u r k d j i a n iii BLOOMSBURY VISUAL ARTS Bloomsbury Publishing Plc 50 Bedford Square, London, WC1B 3DP, UK 1385 Broadway, New York, NY 10018, USA 29 Earlsfort Terrace, Dublin 2, Ireland BLOOMSBURY, BLOOMSBURY VISUAL ARTS and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published in Great Britain 2021 Selection, editorial matter, Introduction © Maude Bass-Krueger, Hayley Edwards-Dujardin, and Sophie Kurkdjian, 2021 Individual chapters © their Authors, 2021 Maude Bass-Krueger, Hayley Edwards-Dujardin, and Sophie Kurkdjian have asserted their right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identifi ed as Editors of this work. For legal purposes the Acknowledgments on p. xiii constitute an extension of this copyright page. Cover design by Adriana Brioso Cover image: Two women wearing a Poiret military coat, c.1915. Postcard from authors’ personal collection. This work is published subject to a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives Licence. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher Bloomsbury Publishing Plc does not have any control over, or responsibility for, any third- party websites referred to or in this book.
    [Show full text]