DOCSLIB.ORG

NOTES in RESPECT of TALKS to TRAINEE MANX ADVOCATES (Talk at 6Pm on 28 April 2014)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NOTES in RESPECT of TALKS to TRAINEE MANX ADVOCATES (Talk at 6Pm on 28 April 2014) NOTES IN RESPECT OF TALKS TO TRAINEE MANX ADVOCATES (Talk at 6pm on 28 April 2014) MANX CASE LAW ON THE RULES OF THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE 2009 C O N T E N T S Pages Precedent in Manx law ……………………………………………………………………………… 2 - 6 The overriding objective and the new litigation culture ………………………………… 6 - 20 Summary judgment and strike out …………………………………………………………….. 20 - 24 Split trials ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 24 - 32 Disclosure of information, pleadings, further information and expert evidence .. 32 – 38 Litigation privilege ……………………………………………………………………………………. 38 Amendment of pleadings ………………………………………………………………………….. 38 - 49 Interim payments …………………………………………………………………………………….. 49 Relief from sanctions ………………………………………………………………………………… 49 - 51 Second appeals in respect of the assessment of costs …………………………………. 51 - 58 Universalism and Rule 4.16(1)(b) ………………………………………………………………. 59 - 60 Litigation friends ………………………………………………………………………………………. 60 General Civil Restraint Order ……………………………………………………………………… 60 Penal notices …………………………………………………………………………………………… 61 Exclusion of evidence ……………………………………………………………………………..… 61 - 62 Rule 14.9(1) of the 2009 Rules and extension of time to appeal ……………….….. 62 – 63 Extension of time …………………………………………………………………………………….. 63 Compliance with court orders ……………………………………………………………………. 63 - 65 Jurisdictional issues in maritime claims ………………………………………………………. 66 - 67 Service out of jurisdiction and appropriate forum issues ………………………………. 67 - 69 Enforcement of executions ……………………………………………………………………….. 69 Setting aside default judgment ………………………………………………………………….. 69 Security for costs………………………………………………………………………………………. 69 - 70 Rules 2.43 and 2.44 and service ………………………………………………………………… 70 Stale matters …………………………………………………………………………………………… 71 Stays ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 71 Letters of request …………………………………………………………………………………….. 71 - 72 Rule 14.14(2) ………………………………………………………………………………………….. 72 Offers to settle …………………………………………………………………………………………. 72 Costs in a small claims context ………………………………………………………………….. 72 Lord Dyson’s lecture in 2013 ……………………………………………………………………… 72 - 79 General ……………………………………………………………. ……………………………………. 79 – 81 1 Precedent in Manx law 1. Before turning specifically to Manx case law on the Rules of the High Court of Justice 2009 (the “2009 Rules”) reference should be made to precedent in Manx law. The Appeal Division in Dominator Limited v Gilberson SL (judgment 1 May 2009 subsequently referred to at paragraph 39 of the Appeal Division’s judgment in Hamblett delivered on the 12 September 2013) stated: “91. We note that Mr Jacobs also made reference to Frankland v R [1987-89] MLR 65, at 80, where Lord Ackner observed that : ‘Decisions of English courts, particularly decisions of the House of Lords and the Court of Appeal in England, are not binding on Manx courts, but they are of high persuasive authority … Such decisions should generally be followed unless there is some provision to the contrary in a Manx statute, or there is some clear decision of a Manx court to the contrary, or exceptionally, there is some local condition which would give good reason for not following the particular English decision.’ 92. For the purposes of this appeal it is unnecessary for this court to express any view as to whether or not such dicta have the same force today as they had over 20 years ago. However, even without the benefit of full argument on such issue, we are bound to express some doubt whether they do so in the context of a jurisdiction which is becoming increasingly independent of English statutes and procedure and is frequently choosing to be informed by or to adopt the common law and practices found in jurisdictions other than England. 93. Similarly it may be that this court`s decision in In the Matter of the Petition of Cussons [2001-03] MLR 539, at 548, where this court stated: ‘The correct approach seems to us to be to establish the English precedent … and to follow that precedent unless there is any justification to depart from it in line with Frankland v R.’ will need at some stage to be reconsidered.” 2. The following are extracts from Bitel v Kyrgyz Mobil (Deemster Doyle’s judgment 30 November 2007): “Precedent 529. Counsel have referred to authorities from various jurisdictions including the Isle of Man, England and Wales, Jersey, Guernsey, the United States of America, Australia, Canada and the British Virgin Islands. In such circumstances it may be of some assistance to set out the Manx law position in relation to precedents from other jurisdictions. 530. If a point of law is covered by local Isle of Man authority especially if that authority is from the Appeal Division or the Privy Council dealing with an appeal from the Isle of Man then it is to that authority which the court should turn in the first instance. 2 531. If however there is no local binding authority then it is appropriate for counsel and the court to look beyond local frontiers. 532. Lord Ackner sitting in the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in Frankland and Moore v R 1987-89 MLR 65 at page 80 stated: "Decisions of English courts, particularly decisions of the House of Lords and the Court of Appeal in England, are not binding on Manx courts, but they are of high persuasive authority, as was correctly pointed out by Glidewell, J.A. in giving the judgment of the Staff of Government Division (Criminal Jurisdiction). Such decisions should generally be followed unless either there is some provision to the contrary in a Manx statute or there is some clear decision of a Manx court to the contrary, or, exceptionally, there is some local condition which would give good reason for not following the particular English decision. The persuasive effect of a judgment of the House of Lords, which has largely the same composition as the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, the final Court of Appeal from a Manx court, is bound to be very high.” 533. Manx law has developed significantly since Lord Ackner uttered those words over twenty years ago now. 534. The traditional position in relation to English precedent in Manx law was briefly set out at pages 449-463 of Solly's Government and Law in the Isle of Man (1994). At page 463 a relatively young advocate endeavoured to summarise the position as follows: "In summary, it is clear that English decisions are not strictly binding on Manx courts but that they are of high persuasive value and will frequently be followed in the absence of special circumstances or local precedent to the contrary. It is to be hoped that Manx common law will develop independently in accordance with the needs, requirements and interests of the inhabitants of the Isle of Man and indeed the international community of which the Island is a part. It is to be hoped that Deemsters will not slavishly follow English decisions, which in certain cases may not be in the best interests of the Island, in areas where it would be more appropriate to develop Manx law in a different way to the way in which English law has developed and is developing.” 535. Judge of Appeal Hytner in Barr and Anglo International Holdings Limited 1990-92 MLR 398 at page 409 stated: "Since this court is not in any way bound by decisions of the English courts it should not be assumed that we would follow dicta abandoned by Parliament.” 536. In City and International Securities Limited 2001-03 MLR 239 Deemster Cain had little difficulty in not following the majority judgments in Home Office v Harman [1983] A.C. 280 (House of Lords) which had been challenged before the European Commission of Human Rights. 3 537. In Aguilar v Anglican Windows (IOM) Limited 1987-89 MLR 317 at 325 an advocate endeavoured to persuade Deemster Corrin not to follow the Privy Council decision in Selvanayagam v University of W Indies on the grounds that it had been the subject of criticism and that their Lordships had confused remoteness and mitigation. Deemster Corrin at page 325 stated that the decision "is, nevertheless, a decision of the Privy Council and, if not actually binding, is very persuasive authority in this court, and I propose to follow it.” 538. Deemster Corrin in Cusack, Cotter v Scroop Limited (judgment 16th January 1997) stated at page 9: "The Isle of Man is an active member of the Commonwealth and whilst historically it has tended to follow English law I feel quite free to look for guidance to other Commonwealth countries as there is no binding or persuasive authority to the contrary in England.” 539. The High Court of Australia in Cook v Cook (1986) 162 CLR 376 at 390 stated: "…the history of the country and of the common law makes it inevitable and desirable that the courts of this country will continue to obtain assistance and guidance from the learning and reasoning of United Kingdom courts just as Australian courts benefit from the learning and reasoning of other great common law courts.” 540. Thanks in the main to Deemster William Cain and to Dr Alan Milner of Law Reports International the Island has had an excellent system of local law reporting for some many years now. Increasingly it is to our own local judgments that we are turning in dealing with the legal issues of the day. 541. In addition to applying our own local precedents Manx courts will also continue to benefit from the learning and reasoning of judgments of the English courts and "other great common law courts" including the High Court of Australia.” 3. Manx law has come a long way since the words written by Attorney General Ramsey B Moore in his useful book on The Isle
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Standing Committee of Tynwald on Emoluments First Report for the Session 2020-21 Provision for an Independent Pay Body, and Other Matters
    PP 2021/0014 STANDING COMMITTEE OF TYNWALD ON EMOLUMENTS FIRST REPORT FOR THE SESSION 2020-2021 PROVISION FOR AN INDEPENDENT PAY BODY, AND OTHER MATTERS STANDING COMMITTEE OF TYNWALD ON EMOLUMENTS FIRST REPORT FOR THE SESSION 2020-21 PROVISION FOR AN INDEPENDENT PAY BODY, AND OTHER MATTERS 1. There shall be a Standing Committee of the Court on Emoluments. 2. The Committee shall be chaired by the Speaker of the House of Keys and composed of the Members of the Management and Members’ Standards Committee of the Keys, and three Members of the Council elected by that Branch. 3. The Committee shall - (i) consider and report to Tynwald on - (a) the emoluments of H E Lieutenant Governor, their Honours the First and Second Deemsters and the Judge of Appeal, H M Attorney General, the High Bailiff, the Deputy High Bailiff and the Clerk of Tynwald; (b) the Tynwald Membership Pension Scheme; and (c) in addition to its consultative functions set out in paragraph 8.3 (ii) and as it thinks fit, the emoluments of Members of Tynwald; (iii) carry out its consultative functions under section 6(3) of the Payments of Members’ Expenses Act 1989, as the body designated by the Payment Of Members' Expenses (Designation of Consultative Body) Order 1989. The powers, privileges and immunities relating to the work of a committee of Tynwald include those conferred by the Tynwald Proceedings Act 1876, the Privileges of Tynwald (Publications) Act 1973, the Tynwald Proceedings Act 1984 and by the Standing Orders of Tynwald Court. Committee Membership The Hon J P Watterson SHK (Rushen) (Chairman) Mr D J Ashford MHK (Douglas East) Miss T M August-Hanson MLC Ms J M Edge MHK (Onchan) Mr R W Henderson MLC Mrs M M Maska MLC Mr C P Robertshaw MHK (Douglas East) Copies of this Report may be obtained from the Tynwald Library, Legislative Buildings, Finch Road, Douglas, IM1 3PW (Tel: 01624 685520) or may be consulted at www.tynwald.org.im.
    [Show full text]
  • Duties of Advocates to the High Court of Justice of the Isle of Man
    NOTES IN RESPECT OF TALKS TO TRAINEE MANX ADVOCATES (Talk at 5pm on 16 October 2017) DUTIES OF ADVOCATES TO THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE ISLE OF MAN C O N T E N T S Pages The Advocate’s Oath ……..………………………………………………………………………… 1 The Manx legal profession ………………………………………………………………………… 1 - 5 The Advocate’s duty to assist the court ……………………………………………………... 5 - 7 R v C ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 8 - 15 Seeking to withdraw from a case ………………………………………………………………. 15 - 20 Assistance to the court …………………………………………………………………………….. 20 - 24 Nigel Teare’s lecture on The Advocate and the Deemster …………………………….. 24 - 26 Concise skeleton arguments ……………………………………………………………………… 26 - 33 Geoffrey Ma’s lecture on The Practice of Law : a Vocation Survives Amidst Globalisation ……………………………………………………………………………………………. 33 - 35 Unnecessary documentation …………………………………………………………….……….. 35 – 39 A useful Indian authority ………………………………………………………………………….. 39 - 40 Other authorities ……………………………………………………………………………………… 40 - 43 Request clarification of judgment where genuinely necessary .……………………… 43 Draw up draft order …………………..…………………………………………………………….. 43 - 45 Stand up to the Deemster ….……………………………………………………………………… 45 - 46 Disclosure duties ……………………………………………………………………………………... 46 - 53 The new litigation culture: expedition, proportionality and co-operation not confrontation ………………………………………..……………………..…………………………. 53 - 63 Recusal applications ……..…………………………………………………………………………. 63 Pressure ..………….……………………………………………………………………………………. 63 - 64 Lord Neuberger’s lecture on The Future of the Bar …………………………………….… 64 – 68 Rule of Law: special duty ………………………………………………………………………….. 68 - 71 Further reading ………………………………………………………………………………………… 71 - 72 DUTIES OF ADVOCATES TO THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE ISLE OF MAN The Advocate’s Oath 1. By his or her oath an advocate swears that the advocate “will truly and honestly demean myself in the practice and knowledge of an Advocate to the best of my ability.” This oath dates back to the Attorney’s Act 1777 and focuses on two crucial elements of the practice of an advocate.
    [Show full text]
  • 220155833.Pdf
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Oxford Brookes University: RADAR RADAR Oxford Brookes University – Research Archive and Digital Asset Repository (RADAR) Judicial Officers and Advocates of the Isle of Man, 1765-1991 Edge, P (2000) This version is available: https://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/items/2b20d2b0-3d6d-06ab-3090-36635db62328/1/ Available on RADAR: August 2010 Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. This document is the original version. Some differences between the published version and this version may remain and you are advised to consult the published version if you wish to cite from it. go/radar www.brookes.ac.uk/ Directorate of Learning Resources Judicial Officers and Advocates of the Isle of Man, 1765-1991. Page created by [email protected], from data gathered in 1992. Page created 1/1/2000, not maintained. Governors and Lieutenant-Governors. 1761 John Wood. (Governor) 1773 Henry Hope. 1775 Richard Dawson. 1777 Edward Smith. (Governor) 1790 Alexander Shaw. 1793 John Murray, Duke of Atholl. (Governor) 1804 Henry Murray. 1805 Colonel Cornelius Smelt. 1832 Colonel Lord Ready. 1845 Charles Hope.
    [Show full text]
  • Remuneration for Scrutiny Roles
    PP 2016/0111 STANDING COMMITTEE OF TYNWALD ON EMOLUMENTS FIRST REPORT 2015-16 REMUNERATION FOR SCRUTINY ROLES FIRST REPORT OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE OF TYNWALD ON EMOLUMENTS 2015-16: REMUNERATION FOR SCRUTINY ROLES The Committee shall - (i) consider and report to Tynwald on - (a) the emoluments of H E Lieutenant Governor, their Honours the First and Second Deemsters and the Judge of Appeal, H M Attorney General, the High Bailiff, the Deputy High Bailiff and the Clerk of Tynwald; (b) the Tynwald Membership Pension Scheme; and (c) in addition to its consultative functions set out in paragraph 4.3(ii) and as it thinks fit, the emoluments of Members of Tynwald; (ii) carry out its consultative functions under section 6(3) of the Payments of Members’ Expenses Act 1989, as the body designated by the Payment of Members’ Expenses (Designation of Consultative Body) Order 1989.” The powers, privileges and immunities relating to the work of a committee of Tynwald are those conferred by sections 3 and 4 of the Tynwald Proceedings Act 1876, sections 1 to 4 of the Privileges of Tynwald (Publications) Act 1973 and sections 2 to 4 of the Tynwald Proceedings Act 1984. Committee Membership The Hon S C Rodan SHK (Garff) (Chairman) Hon R H Quayle MHK (Middle) Mr D J Quirk MHK (Onchan) Mr C R Robertshaw MHK (Douglas East) Mr D M Anderson MLC Mr D C Cretney MLC Mr J R Turner MLC Copies of this Report may be obtained from the Tynwald Library, Legislative Buildings, Finch Road, Douglas IM1 3PW (Tel 01624 685520, Fax 01624 685522) or may be consulted at www.tynwald.org.im All correspondence with regard to this Report should be addressed to the Clerk of Tynwald, Legislative Buildings, Finch Road, Douglas IM1 3PW.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Committee on the Emoluments of Certain Public Servants First
    PP66/08 J o in t C o m m it t ee on th e E m o lu m en t s of C er t a in P u blic Ser v a n t s F ir st R epo r t fo r th e Se ssio n 2007-2008 FIRST REPORT OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON THE EMOLUMENTS OF CERTAIN PUBLIC SERVANTS 2007/2008 Constituted 2nd and 30th March 1965 as a Standing Joint Committee to examine the amount of expenses paid to Members and the salaries of Senior Government Officials and Crown Officers. The Keys representatives are the members of the Consultative Committee of the House. By its First Report 1992/ 93 the terms of reference were revised as follows - (i) to consider and report to the Council and Keys on - (a) the emoluments of H E Lieutenant Governor, their Honours the First and Second Deemsters and the Judge of Appeal, H M Attorney General, the High Bailiff, the Deputy High Bailiff and the Clerk of Tynwald; (b) the Tynwald Membership Pension Scheme; and (c) in addition to its consultative functions set out in paragraph (i) and as it thinks fit, the emoluments of Members of Tynwald; (ii) to carry out its consultative functions under section 6(3) of the Payments of Members’ Expenses Act 1989, as the body designated by the Payment Of Members’ Expenses (Designation of Consultative Body) Order 1989. The powers, privileges and immunities relating to the work of a committee of Tynwald are those conferred by sections 3 and 4 of the Tynwald Proceedings Act 1876, sections 1 to 4 of the Privileges of Tynwald (Publications) Act 1973 and sections 2 to 4 of the Tynwald Proceedings Act 1984.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee Report Template
    PP 2021/0052 TYNWALD MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE THIRD REPORT FOR THE SESSION 2020-2021 Tynwald Honours TYNWALD MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE THIRD REPORT FOR THE SESSION 2020-2021 Tynwald Honours There shall be a Standing Committee of the Court on Management of the Clerk of Tynwald's Office. The Committee shall be chaired by the Speaker of the House of Keys, the Vice- Chairman shall be the President of Tynwald and shall further be composed of two Members of the House of Keys and a Member of the Legislative Council. The Committee shall - (i) oversee the management of the secretariat of the Office of the Clerk of Tynwald; (ii) ensure that necessary services are provided for Members of Tynwald, that appropriate resources are made available to allow for such services and that such resources are properly used; (iii) oversee the efficient and effective use of resources by the Clerk of Tynwald, who shall be the Accounting Officer for the Tynwald budget; (iv) provide authority for setting staffing levels and overall terms and conditions of service of the staff of the Office of the Clerk of Tynwald; (v) for the purposes of the Public Records Act 1999 be the Committee authorized to make decisions in relation to Tynwald papers; (vi) be the Tynwald Management Committee referred to in section 3 of the Tynwald Auditor General Act 2011, with the relevant powers and responsibilities in relation to the Tynwald Auditor General; and (vii) be the Tynwald Management Committee referred to in section 3 of the Tynwald Commissioner for Administration Act 2011, with the relevant powers and responsibilities in relation to the Tynwald Commissioner for Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Item Number Item Action Required 1. OPENING of the MEETING 1.1
    PORT ST MARY COMMISSIONERS ORDINARY BOARD MEETING 27th NOVEMBER 2019 AGENDA – OPEN PUBLIC SESSION Item Item Action Required Number 1. OPENING OF THE MEETING As required by Board 1.1 Welcome, Apologies & Declarations members 2. MINUTES Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting held 2.1 For Board approval on the 23rd October 2019 3. MATTERS ARISING Matters arising from previous Clerk to provide 3.1 meetings necessary updates For Board discussion & 3.3 Complaints Policy & Procedure draft approval 4. MOTIONS - None 5. FINANCE 5.1 Invoices for payment November 2019 For Board approval 6. PROJECTS 6.1 Mariners Shelter For noting For discussion & Board 6.2 Manxonia House approval 6.3 Remembrance Service & Garden For noting Page 1 of 58 6.4 Skate Park For noting 6.5 Public Conveniences For noting 6.6 Highways For noting 6.7 Happy Valley For noting 6.8 Boat Park For noting 6.9 Reduction in Board numbers For noting 6.10 Jetty Repair For noting 6.11 Bay Queen Exhibition For noting Mona’s Queen III Exhibition – Verbal 6.12 For noting update from the Chair For discussion & Board 6.13 Christmas approval 7. PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE & COMMUNICATIONS 7.1 Letter of condolence For noting 7.2 Letter of thanks from Nick Watterson For noting 7.3 Tynwald Commissioner communication For noting Page 2 of 58 Communication from Manx Utilities re For Board discussion & 7.4 street light columns approval Communication from Waste 7.5 For noting Management Unit 7.6 3rd Supplemental Valuation List For noting Request from Rushen Silver Band re For Board discussion & 7.7 street collection approval Scoill Phurt le Moirrey Play Area – 7.8 Verbal item submitted by the Vice For Board discussion Chairman Correspondence from the Ministers 7.9 Watterson & Skelly regarding flood For discussion risks 7.10 Letter received from Mr Merchant For discussion 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Justice
    NOTES IN RESPECT OF TALKS TO TRAINEE MANX ADVOCATES [27 August 2019] OPEN JUSTICE OPEN JUSTICE “Publicity is the very soul of justice. It is the keenest spur to exertion and the surest of all guards against improbity” (Jeremy Bentham). 1. The Appeal Division (Judge of Appeal Storey and Deemster Doyle) in Reid v McNicholas (judgment [2] 24 July 2018) referred to the important principles of open justice and stressed the need for courts to be vigilant when the parties consent to derogations for open justice. The Appeal Division referred to Rules 9.2(1), (2) and (3) and stated: “25. Such procedural rules must, of course, be read in light of the leading judgments in this important area of the law. 26. The local jurisprudence is set out in numerous judgments including this court's judgment (differently constituted) in Taylor v Attorney General (No 2) 2012 MLR 199, Deemster Doyle's judgments in Harding and Re Delphi Trust 2014 MLR 51, Deemster Corlett's judgment in Gubay v Willers 2009/11 (J 1734: 3 December 2015) and this court's judgment in Attorney General v Kelly 2017/12 (24 November 2017). 27. The principle of open justice is well established in Manx law. An Act of Tynwald in 1731 referred to the opportunity to be present "in open Court". Deemster Farrant in Myers 1921-51 MLR 331 at page 337 stressed, in the context of apparent bias, that "justice must not only be done but must be seen to be done" (lines 14 – 15). In the 21st century Deemster Kerruish in Byrne 2005-06 MLR N14 (30 March 2006) at paragraph [14] put it succinctly when he stated: "The general rule is that all hearings ought to be in public." 28.
    [Show full text]
  • Appointment of Deemster Information Pack
    APPOINTMENT OF DEEMSTER INFORMATION PACK Cabinet Office October 2019 1 Contents 1. Advertisement ............................................................................................... 3 2. Office Description .......................................................................................... 4 3. Person Specification ....................................................................................... 5 4. Selection Procedure ....................................................................................... 7 5. Main Terms and Conditions of Appointment as Deemster ................................. 8 2 1. Advertisement Appointment of Deemster The Isle of Man prides itself on its values of democracy, good government and the importance of the rule of law. The judiciary is a key component of delivering these values and to the Island’s international reputation. Applications are invited from on and off-Island candidates for the position of Deemster. This is a Crown appointment made by His Excellency the Lieutenant Governor pursuant to section 3B (1) of the High Court Act 1991. This is a full time role, however consideration will be given to job share partnerships (which would not necessarily require full-time residence on the Isle of Man) and if interested you should discuss this with the First Deemster. The Deemster will be particularly responsible for presiding over the Court of General Gaol Delivery (which is broadly equivalent to the Crown Court in England and Wales). The Deemster will also be responsible for administration, ceremonial and other duties assigned by the First Deemster. The Deemster will hold office at the pleasure of His Excellency. The appointment will be on the advice of a Selection Panel. Candidates for this position must meet the following criteria:- • A qualified advocate, barrister or solicitor of at least 10 years standing. • Relevant judicial experience either in the Isle of Man or elsewhere within the British Isles for a minimum of 3 years (full or part time) prior to taking up office.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012-Pp-0079
    1 Contents Foreword .......................................................................... 2 2010-11: a year of comings and goings ........................ 3 Primary Legislation ........................................................11 Primary and Secondary Legislation .............................12 In Committee ................................................................. 13 Highlights of the Year ....................................................15 Tynwald Day ....................................................................16 Reaching out to young people and the wider community ............................................. 20 Clerk of Tynwald’s Office .............................................. 27 Appendices 1. List of Members with constituency and parliamentary appointments and parliamentary Committees as at 31st July 2011 ....................................................... 30 2. Officers in the Clerk of Tynwald’s Office ................ 31 3. Expenses of the Legislature .................................... 32 2 TYNWALD ANNUAL REPORT 2010-11 Welcome to the Tynwald Annual Report 2010-11 Foreword by the Presiding Officers TYNWALD ANNUAL REPORT 2010-11 3 Welcome to the Tynwald Annual Report 2010-11 This report covers the last year of the House Committees and debates, the continuing of Keys which was elected in November work of the legislature in the overall field of 2006 and dissolved in August 2011. engagement continued unabated. This area of activity comprises both engagement with In it we pay tribute to the outgoing
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Council Elections Bill Was One of Only Two Items to Pass Through Both Branches and Be Promulgated on Tynwald Hill Within the Same Year
    Tynwald Annual Report Parliamentary year 2016/2017 We hope you will find this report useful. If you would like to comment on any aspect of it, please contact: The Clerk of Tynwald Office of the Clerk of Tynwald Legislative Buildings Finch Road Douglas Isle of Man IM1 3PW Get in touch Twitter : @tynwaldinfo Telephone: +44 (0)1624 685500 Email: [email protected] An electronic copy of this report can be found at: www.tynwald.org.im © Office of the Clerk of Tynwald Copyright 2017 The text of this document may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading or derogatory context. The material must be acknowledged as copyright of the Office of the Clerk of Tynwald and the title of the document specified. PP 2017/0145 2 Tynwald Annual Report 2016/2017 Contents Foreword by the Presiding Officers 4 1867 Celebrations 6 Changes in Political Membership 8 The Work of the Legislature 10 Tynwald Day 18 Interparliamentary Engagement 26 Education and Outreach 34 The Clerk of Tynwald’s Office 42 Appendix 48 3 PRESIDENT OF TYNWALD The Hon Stephen Charles Rodan BSc (Hons) MRPharmS MLC SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF KEYS The Hon Juan Paul Watterson BA FCA CMgr FCMI SHK foreword 4 Tynwald Annual Report 2016/2017 Welcome to the Tynwald Annual Report 2016/7 2016 saw the 150th anniversary of the House of Keys Elections Act 1866. In 2017 we celebrated the 150th anniversary of the first elections which took place under that Act, with polling taking place in the first week of April 1867.
    [Show full text]
  • Report – Part 1 a M Thompson 2017 Skelly Shimmin Reduced
    REPORT OF REVIEW OF THE ACTIONS OF MINISTERS SHIMMIN AND SKELLY AND WHETHER THEY KNOWINGLY FAILED TO DECLARE A CONFLICT IN RELATION TO PLANNING APPLICATION 15/00124/B PART 1 ANGELA MAIN THOMPSON O.B.E. DATED 18 FEBRUARY 2017 The Complainant APPENDIX 4: Correspondence with the Ministers ........................................................................................ 64 3 The development and lodged his paper on 20 May 2015, complainantwas included as an "interested person". 6. The appointed independent Planning Inspector, Mr Stephen Amos, held an inquiry on 17 June 2015, following a site visit on 15 June. Meary Voar Developments Ltd was represented by Mr G. Steele QC who called evidence from the architect and a town planning consultant. g,:,plainant who had provided written objections also gave evidence and the senior planning officer, Witnessc , was also questioned. 7. Before dealing with the Inspector's recommendations, it is necessary to go back to the original application made in 2011 and approved in 2012. That application was contentious and, as indicated, opposed by �,ptainant. Between the application being lodged and its consideration by the Planning Committee, the then Minister for Infrastructure, Mr David Cretney, presented to Tynwald in February 2012 a consultation document on a draft planning policy statement C'PPS") which was to have immediate effect. The purpose of the statement was to ensure that the planning system supported economic and employment growth. The Department would have regard to the development plan and, in particular, would seek proposals to be supported by evidence demonstrating that the proposed development would secure sustainable, long-term, economic growth of Island-wide benefit.
    [Show full text]