DOCSLIB.ORG

Crystallite Orientation Discontinuities and the Evolution of Mammalian Enamel – Or, When Is a Prism?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Scanning Microscopy Volume 3 Number 2 Article 28 6-20-1989 Crystallite Orientation Discontinuities and the Evolution of Mammalian Enamel – Or, When is a Prism? K. S. Lester Westmead Hospital Dental Clinical School W. von Koenigswald University of Bonn Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/microscopy Part of the Life Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Lester, K. S. and von Koenigswald, W. (1989) "Crystallite Orientation Discontinuities and the Evolution of Mammalian Enamel – Or, When is a Prism?," Scanning Microscopy: Vol. 3 : No. 2 , Article 28. Available at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/microscopy/vol3/iss2/28 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western Dairy Center at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scanning Microscopy by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Scanning Microscopy, Vol. 3, No. 2, 1989 (Pages 645-663) 0891-7035/89$3.00+.00 Scanning Microscopy International, Chicago (AMF O'Hare), IL 60666 USA CRYSTALLITEORIENTATION DISCONTINUITIES AND THE EVOLUTION OF MAMMALIANENAMEL - OR, WHENIS A PRISM? K.S. Lester • 1 and W. von Koenigswald 2 1 Westmead Hospital Dental Clinical School, Westmead, Australia 2 Paleontological Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, West Germany (Received for publication January 19, 1989, and in revised form June 20, 1989) Abstract Introduction The nature and relationship of crystallite The existence of an additional crystallite domains have been explored in fossil and extant orientation discontinuity, minor boundary plane, enFels spanning an evolutionary period of 200 x or seam has been described and illustrated by 10 years. Minor crystallite orientation discon­ scanning electron microscopy as a consistent tinuities, either linear or planar, were found to feature of the enamel of many Chiroptera and of be consistent characteristics of all specimens the dermopteran Cynocephalus (Lester and Hand, examined. 1987; Lester, et al., 1988). The seam occurs where The earliest minor discontinuity is linear the horse-shoe shaped prism boundary is incomplete (convergence line), shown here in Oligokyphus and and contiguous with the interprism {Fig. 1). Eozostrodon. The convergence line would be the Crystallites on either side of the seam lie at an result of the occasional development of a conical angle to it within the longitudinal axis of the Tomes' process to the parent ameloblast. An prism so as to subtend an acute angle with the increase in number and regularity of convergence enamel-dentine junction (usually 65-70°). The lines, shown here in Haldanodon, marks the appear­ seams are not evident where the prism boundaries ance of a regular pseudoprismatic enamel struc­ are complete. which. in Chiroptera, is most often ture. in the outer one third where the enamel is thick. The second minor discontinuity to appear is The developmental basis for seams has been des­ planar (seam), shown here in a dryolestid eupanto­ cribed in terms of the morphology of the formative there. The seam has previously been deduced to front, which, for most practical purposes, may be relate developmentally to a central groove on the taken to be the same thing as the mineralizing sloping floor-wall of the Tomes' process pit. front. A seam may be related to a consistent Coincident with the appearance of the seam is groove in the most superficial part of the that of a rudimentary major planar discontinuity developing floor wall of the Tomes' process pit which does not enclose a domain to constitute what (Lester and Boyde, 1987). would normally be acknowledged as a prism. Its A clue to the possible significance of the developmental basis would be the establishment of seam was found in the enamel of the vampire bat a steep wall and floor (however partial in (Desmodus rotundus murinus) {Lester et al., 1988). circumference) to the Tomes' process pit. Here, the degree of prism development is relative­ The extent of the major planar discontinuities ly poor throughout, with normal prism demarcation was found to increase subsequently to enclose a progressively lost in the outer third of the classically recognizable prismatic domain, shown cuspal enamel and progressively in the thinning here in Amphiperatherium, Hassianycteris, Smilodon cervical enamel. The seams, however, present in and Felis. This would be consistent with the conjunction with the prisms, persist in a recog­ further development of a definitive floor and wall nizable form in the absence of definitive prisms to the Tomes' process pit. both cuspally and cervically (Fig. 2). The sequential appearance of minor linear, We were subsequently impressed by the minor planar and major planar discontinuities in similarity of these non-prismatic areas of the crystallite orientation is seen as fundamental to enamel of Desmodus to the enamel of some fossil the evolution of mammalian enamel structure. mammals we had begun to examine. Our aim in this paper is to demonstrate the presence, and discuss the possible evolutionary significance of, both minor and major crystallite orientation KEYWORDS: enamel, evolution, mammals, prisms, discontinuities in the enamel of a range of fossil pseudoprisms, convergence lines, seams. and extant mammals and in an advanced therapsid. The description of these features, together with a •Address for Correspondence: recent analysis of Procerberus enamel which Keith S. Lester, Westmead Hospital Dental Clinical displays prismatic, pseudoprismatic and aprismatic School, Westmead, N.S.W. 2145 AUSTRALIA. Phone No: forms in the one surface (Lester, 1989b), prompt a {02)633.7173 fresh look at our conceptualization of the development and evolution of enamel. 645 K.S. Lester and W. von Koenigswald A scheme of descriptive terms, with suggested Materials and Methods preferred terminology in italics and alternative terms (in brackets), is offered below together Enamel from teeth or tooth fragments of the with some definitions. following taxa were examined. Crystallite orientation in enamel may be: Oligokyphus sp., ictidosaurian therapsid, continuous - aprismatic enamel (non-prismatic, Rhaeto-Liassic, Mendip Hills, Somerset, England. prisrnless) Several teeth provided by T. Rich, Melbourne. or Eozostrodon parvus, rnorganucodontid mammal, discontinuous - pseudoprismatic enamel# (pre­ Rhaeto-Liassic, Ewenny Bridgend, Glamorgan, Wales. prisrnatic); prismatic enamel Several teeth provided by K.A. Joysey, Cambridge. if discontinuous, the discontinuity may be: Haldanodon expectatus, docodont mammal, Kirnrne­ linear - convergence line* ridgian, Guimarota coal mine, Portugal. Several or tooth fragments provided by B. Krebs, Berlin. planar Eupantothere, dryolestid mammal, Kirnrneridgian, if planar, the discontinuity may be: Guirnarota coal mine, Portugal. Several tooth frag­ Geological\ minor - seam• (minor boundary plane) ments provided by B. Krebs, Berlin. or Amphiperatherium sp., didelphid marsupial, time major¢ Middle Oligocene, Moehren 13, Bavaria, W. Germany. if major, the discontinuity may be: Teeth provided by K. Heissig,. Muenchen. rudimentary Hassianycteris messelensis, palaeochiropteran, partial - partial prism boundary Middle Eocene, Messel near Darmstadt, W. Germany. definitive - prism boundary One tooth provided by G. Storch, Frankfurt. (major boundary plsne, border \ discontinuity, prism sheath, prism border) Definitions # Pseudoprisrnatic enamel: is a discontinuous Fig. 1. Syconycteris australis (chiropteran) enamel characterised by repetitive domains related enamel: oblique transverse section of prisms in a developmentally to conical Tornes' processes. Each polished, etched specimen showing the consistency domain (pseudoprisrn) is organised between minor and regularity of the seams (at arrows) in linear discontinuities in crystallite orientation association with the open ends of the horseshoe­ (convergence lines) each of which traces the path shaped prisms (p) and contiguous interprisrnatic of the tip of the Tornes' process of the parent enamel (ip). Bar= 10 µrn. ameloblast through the enamel during formation. * Convergence line: is a minor linear discon­ Fig. 2. Desmodus rotundus murinus (chiropteran) tinuity in crystallite orientation and appears as enamel: longitudinal section of outer third of a convergence of crystallite tips on a linear cuspal enamel in a polished, etched specimen focus. It is related developmentally to and traces showing the persistence of a seam (? convergence the withdrawal of the conical tip of the Tornes' line) (arrowed) in the absence of a definitive process of the ameloblast through enamel during prism. Bar= 1 µrn. development. + Seam: is a minor planar discontinuity in crys­ Fig. 3. Oligokyphus sp. (ictidosaurian therapsid) tallite orientation and appears as a convergence enamel: etched transverse fracture in cervical of crystallites to form a minor boundary plane region showing convergence lines (at arrows}, with often in association with a typical horseshoe­ associated angled crystallites, extending through shaped prism. It is related developmentally to the the bulk of the enamel thickness (edj enamel­ occurrence of a central groove on the more super­ dentine junction; oes outer enamel surface). ficial part of the sloping floor-wall of the Compare with Fig. 2. Bar= 10 µm. Tornes' process pit. ~ A major planar discontinuity in crystallite Fig. 4. Eozostrodon parvus (morganucodontid orientation is a plane in enamel at which crystal­ mammal) enamel: etched transverse fracture
Recommended publications
  • And Early Jurassic Sediments, and Patterns of the Triassic-Jurassic

    And Early Jurassic Sediments, and Patterns of the Triassic-Jurassic

    and Early Jurassic sediments, and patterns of the Triassic-Jurassic PAUL E. OLSEN AND tetrapod transition HANS-DIETER SUES Introduction parent answer was that the supposed mass extinc- The Late Triassic-Early Jurassic boundary is fre- tions in the tetrapod record were largely an artifact quently cited as one of the thirteen or so episodes of incorrect or questionable biostratigraphic corre- of major extinctions that punctuate Phanerozoic his- lations. On reexamining the problem, we have come tory (Colbert 1958; Newell 1967; Hallam 1981; Raup to realize that the kinds of patterns revealed by look- and Sepkoski 1982, 1984). These times of apparent ing at the change in taxonomic composition through decimation stand out as one class of the great events time also profoundly depend on the taxonomic levels in the history of life. and the sampling intervals examined. We address Renewed interest in the pattern of mass ex- those problems in this chapter. We have now found tinctions through time has stimulated novel and com- that there does indeed appear to be some sort of prehensive attempts to relate these patterns to other extinction event, but it cannot be examined at the terrestrial and extraterrestrial phenomena (see usual coarse levels of resolution. It requires new fine- Chapter 24). The Triassic-Jurassic boundary takes scaled documentation of specific faunal and floral on special significance in this light. First, the faunal transitions. transitions have been cited as even greater in mag- Stratigraphic correlation of geographically dis- nitude than those of the Cretaceous or the Permian junct rocks and assemblages predetermines our per- (Colbert 1958; Hallam 1981; see also Chapter 24).
  • What Really Happened in the Late Triassic?

    What Really Happened in the Late Triassic?

    Historical Biology, 1991, Vol. 5, pp. 263-278 © 1991 Harwood Academic Publishers, GmbH Reprints available directly from the publisher Printed in the United Kingdom Photocopying permitted by license only WHAT REALLY HAPPENED IN THE LATE TRIASSIC? MICHAEL J. BENTON Department of Geology, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. (Received January 7, 1991) Major extinctions occurred both in the sea and on land during the Late Triassic in two major phases, in the middle to late Carnian and, 12-17 Myr later, at the Triassic-Jurassic boundary. Many recent reports have discounted the role of the earlier event, suggesting that it is (1) an artefact of a subsequent gap in the record, (2) a complex turnover phenomenon, or (3) local to Europe. These three views are disputed, with evidence from both the marine and terrestrial realms. New data on terrestrial tetrapods suggests that the late Carnian event was more important than the end-Triassic event. For tetrapods, the end-Triassic extinction was a whimper that was followed by the radiation of five families of dinosaurs and mammal- like reptiles, while the late Carnian event saw the disappearance of nine diverse families, and subsequent radiation of 13 families of turtles, crocodilomorphs, pterosaurs, dinosaurs, lepidosaurs and mammals. Also, for many groups of marine animals, the Carnian event marked a more significant turning point in diversification than did the end-Triassic event. KEY WORDS: Triassic, mass extinction, tetrapod, dinosaur, macroevolution, fauna. INTRODUCTION Most studies of mass extinction identify a major event in the Late Triassic, usually placed at the Triassic-Jurassic boundary.
  • Reptilian, Therapsid and Mammalian Teeth from the Upper Triassic of Varangéville (Northeastern France) by Pascal GODEFROIT

    Reptilian, Therapsid and Mammalian Teeth from the Upper Triassic of Varangéville (Northeastern France) by Pascal GODEFROIT

    bulletin de l'institut royal des sciences naturelles de belgique sciences de la terre, 67: 83-102, 1997 bulletin van het koninklijk belgisch instituut voor natuurwetenschappen aardwetenschappen, 67: 83-102, 1997 Reptilian, therapsid and mammalian teeth from the Upper Triassic of Varangéville (northeastern France) by Pascal GODEFROIT Abstract isolated teeth, representing five mammalian families. Until recently, mammals were very rare in other localities Microvertebrate remains have been discovered at a new Late Triassic of the Paris Basin and, with rare exceptions, consisted locality in Varangéville (northeastern France). The material includes reptilian (Ichthyosauria indet., Phytosauridae indet., the pterosaur aff. mainly of Haramiyidae. Maubeuge (1955: 124) describes Eudimorphodon, Archosauria indet.), therapsid (advanced Cynodontia) a bone bed in the lower Rhaetian of Varangéville. At the and mammalian (Haramiyidae, Morganucodontidae, Sinoconodonti- present time, only fish teeth have been found in this layer dae and Woutersiidae) teeth, described in the present paper. The faunal composition, closely resembling that of the neighbouring locality of (pers. obs.). In Saint-Nicolas-de-Port, suggests a coastal or a deltaic depositional April 1995, Michel Ulrich, owner of a patch of land environment. in the vicinity of Varangéville, drew the author's atten¬ tion to the presence of fossil bones on his land. He Key-words: Reptiles, therapsids, mammals, teeth, Upper Triassic, very Varangéville. kindly authorized the Institut royal des Sciences natu¬ relles de Belgique to start excavations there. The sédi¬ ments were carefully washed and screened and the micro- remains were Résumé subsequently sorted under a binocular. This led to the discovery of a collection of isolated bones and teeth of Late Triassic vertebrates.
  • The Earliest-Known Mammaliaform Fossil from Greenland Sheds Light on Origin of Mammals

    The Earliest-Known Mammaliaform Fossil from Greenland Sheds Light on Origin of Mammals

    The earliest-known mammaliaform fossil from Greenland sheds light on origin of mammals Tomasz Suleja, Grzegorz Krzesinski b,1, Mateusz Tałandac, Andrzej S. Wolniewicza,d,Błazej_ Błazejowski_ a, Niels Bondee,f, Piotr Gutowskig, Maksymilian Sienkiewiczb, and Grzegorz Niedzwiedzkih,2 aInstitute of Paleobiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 00-818 Warsaw, Poland; bFaculty of Power and Aeronautical Engineering, Institute of Aeronautics and Applied Mechanics, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland; cDepartment of Paleobiology and Evolution, Faculty of Biology, Biological and Chemical Research Centre, University of Warsaw, 02-089 Warsaw, Poland; dDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, OX1 3AN Oxford, United Kingdom; eGeological Section, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; fFur Museum, 7884 Fur, Denmark; gDepartment of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Surgery and Implantology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland; and hDepartment of Organismal Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden Edited by Zhe-Xi Luo, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, and accepted by Editorial Board Member David Jablonski August 29, 2020 (received for review June 16, 2020) Synapsids are unique in having developed multirooted teeth and fossils are from the latest Norian and Rhaetian (Late Triassic), complex occlusions. These innovations evolved in at least two and are represented by isolated teeth (10), incomplete cranial or lineages of mammaliamorphs (Tritylodontidae and Mammalia- jaw remains, and postcranial elements (3). Significant differences formes). Triassic fossils demonstrate that close to the origins of between the earliest haramiyidans and other contemporary mammals, mammaliaform precursors were “experimenting” with clades of mammaliaforms have complicated the problem of tooth structure and function, resulting in novel patterns of occlu- haramiyidan ancestry and their purported relationships to other sion.
  • Aelurosaurus/Elinus 73, 74; ·Fig. 5.5 Alticonodon Lindoei 140

    Aelurosaurus/Elinus 73, 74; ·Fig. 5.5 Alticonodon Lindoei 140

    INDEX acanthodians I basicranium 119; Fig. 8.5 Adrover, R. 132 basioccipital 22, 25, 30 Aegialodon dawsoni 132,134,135,136; Fig. basisphenoid 30 9.1 Basutoland (Lesotho) 41,52 Aelurosaurus/elinus 73, 74; ·Fig. 5.5 Bathonian Stage 104 Africa I, II, 18, 19,21,23,24,25,27,39, Bauria 25; Fig. 2.4 40,72, Ill, 141 Bauriomorpha, bauriomorphs 25 Albian Stage 135 Beckles, S.H. 106, 108 alisphenoid 22, 23, 30, 54, 55, 56, 118 Beckles' Collection 106 Allen, P. 131 Beckles' Pit 106, 108 Allin, E.F. 84, 86, 93 Belesodon 37 alternation of tooth replacement 67, 71, 73 Beliajeva, E.!. 134 Alticonodon lindoei 140 Bettongia 120 America, North 10, 103, 108, 109, 135, 140, Bienotherium 41 141,142 birds, vii, 6, 140, 141 America, South I, 37, 72, 140, 141, 142 Bloemfontein 39 amnion 5; Fig. 1.3 Bolk, L. 77 amniotes 5, 6, 9, 10 Boonstra, L.D. 23, 27 amniotic fluid 5; Fig. 1.3 Branca, W. III Amphibia, amphibians I, 3, 5, 6, 7, II, Brancatherulum tendagurense III 74 braincase 14,27,28,29,30,31,39,41,53, Amphilestes broderipii 102, 103, 103n, 104, 54,55, 114, 118, 120 109, 114; Fig. 7.1 Brink A.S. 31, 32, 34, 35 Amphiodon 135 Broderip, W.J. 100, 102 Amphisbaenidae, amphisbaenids 93, 94 Brodie, P.B. 106 Amphitherium prevostii 101, 102, 103, 104, Broom, R. 27, 39, 40, 91 105, 125, 126; Fig. 7.1 Buckland, W. 100 Anacodon 72 Bug Creek, McCone County, Montana 140 anamniotes 5 Butler, P.M.
  • In Quest for a Phylogeny of Mesozoic Mammals

    In Quest for a Phylogeny of Mesozoic Mammals

    In quest for a phylogeny of Mesozoic mammals ZHE−XI LUO, ZOFIA KIELAN−JAWOROWSKA, and RICHARD L. CIFELLI Luo, Z.−X., Kielan−Jaworowska, Z., and Cifelli, R.L. 2002. In quest for a phylogeny of Mesozoic mammals. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 47 (1): 1–78. We propose a phylogeny of all major groups of Mesozoic mammals based on phylogenetic analyses of 46 taxa and 275 osteological and dental characters, using parsimony methods (Swofford 2000). Mammalia sensu lato (Mammaliaformes of some authors) are monophyletic. Within mammals, Sinoconodon is the most primitive taxon. Sinoconodon, morganu− codontids, docodonts, and Hadrocodium lie outside the mammalian crown group (crown therians + Monotremata) and are, successively, more closely related to the crown group. Within the mammalian crown group, we recognize a funda− mental division into australosphenidan (Gondwana) and boreosphenidan (Laurasia) clades, possibly with vicariant geo− graphic distributions during the Jurassic and Early Cretaceous. We provide additional derived characters supporting these two ancient clades, and we present two evolutionary hypotheses as to how the molars of early monotremes could have evolved. We consider two alternative placements of allotherians (haramiyids + multituberculates). The first, supported by strict consensus of most parsimonious trees, suggests that multituberculates (but not other alllotherians) are closely re− lated to a clade including spalacotheriids + crown therians (Trechnotheria as redefined herein). Alternatively, allotherians can be placed outside the mammalian crown group by a constrained search that reflects the traditional emphasis on the uniqueness of the multituberculate dentition. Given our dataset, these alternative topologies differ in tree−length by only ~0.6% of the total tree length; statistical tests show that these positions do not differ significantly from one another.
  • Review of the Early Allotherian Mammals

    Review of the Early Allotherian Mammals

    Review of the early allotherian mammals PERCY M. BUTLER Butler, P.M. 2000. Review of the early allotherian mammals. -Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 45,4, 317-342. Comparison of the early allotherian genera, Haramiyavia, Thomasia, Theroteinus, and Eleutherodon shows that their molarifom teeth are variants of a common pattern, justify- ing the inclusion of these genera in a single order Haramiyida. Haramiyavia is made the type of a new family Haramiyaviidae. The order Haramiyida is divided into two suborders: (1) Theroteinida (only family Theroteinidae), and (2) Haramiyoidea (families Haramiyaviidae, Haramiyidae, Eleutherodontidae). Dental resemblances support the hy- pothesis that the Multituberculata originated within the Haramiyida, in which case the Haramiyida would be paraphyletic. Derivation of multituberculates from within the Mammaliaformes would involve a highly improbable transformation of the dentition. It is therefore postulated that allotherian (Haramiyida + Multituberculata) and non-allo- therian mammaliaform clades separated before the Mammaliaformes developed a shear- ing dentition with unilateral occlusion and transverse jaw movements. This hypothesis implies that the two clades evolved to a large extent in parallel, to account for the appar- ent synapomorphies of multituberculates and therians. Key words : Haramiyida, Multituberculata, molars, occlusion, homoplasy. Percy M. Butler [percy @ butler92freesewe.co.uk], School of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 OEX, United Kingdom. Introduction The term Allotheria was used originally by Marsh (1880) for an order of mammals, embracing extinct forms characterized by the possession of cheek teeth with two or more longitudinal rows of cusps. They included not only those later known as multituberculates, but also Tritylodon (now removed from the Mamrnalia) and 'Microlestes', now Thomasia.

  • From the Upper Triassic of Saint-Nicolas-De-Port (France)

    A reappraisal of Theroteinus (Haramiyida, Mammaliaformes) from the Upper Triassic of Saint-Nicolas-de-Port (France) Maxime Debuysschere Centre de Recherches sur la Pale´obiodiversite´ et les Pale´oenvironnements (CR2P), UMR 7207 CNRS-MNHN-UPMC (SU), Paris, France ABSTRACT The earliest mammaliaforms are difficult to assess because the fossil record is poor and because their distinctive morphologies cannot be directly compared with more recent mammaliaforms. This is especially true for the haramiyid genus Theroteinus, only known in the Saint-Nicolas-de-Port locality (Rhaetian, France). This study presents a new definition of the type-species Theroteinus nikolai. A new species Theroteinus rosieriensis, sp. nov., is named and distinguished by the lingual shift of distal cusps, a larger size, and a stockier occlusal outline. Comparisons with Eleutherodon, Megaconus and Millsodon suggest that Theroteinus has potential close relatives among the Jurassic haramiyids. Subjects Biodiversity, Evolutionary Studies, Paleontology, Taxonomy Keywords Teeth, Rhaetian, Occlusal pattern, Theroteinida, Europe, Wear, Nomenclature, Theroteinidae INTRODUCTION The earliest mammaliaforms are notoriously poorly known because of the scarcity of specimens (most often isolated teeth) and the difficulty to assess their relationships with later mammaliaforms (including mammals themselves). Among them, haramiyids Submitted 1 July 2016 have long been considered as a very peculiar group that is difficult to study (e.g., Accepted 20 September 2016 Simpson, 1928; Kielan-Jaworowska,Cifelli&Luo,2004). However, even within Published 19 October 2016 haramiyids, the genus Theroteinus Sigogneau-Russell, Frank & Hemmerle´, 1986 is Corresponding author distinctive and has always been set apart. This genus was hitherto known only by Maxime Debuysschere, [email protected] a dozen isolated teeth, all from the locality of Saint-Nicolas-de-Port (Rhaetian, Academic editor north-eastern France), which has yielded a very diversified and abundant micro- Mark Young vertebrate assemblage (see below).
  • A Possible Late Cretaceous “Haramiyidan” from India

    A Possible Late Cretaceous “Haramiyidan” from India

    Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 26(2):488–490, June 2006 © 2006 by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology NOTE A POSSIBLE LATE CRETACEOUS “HARAMIYIDAN” FROM INDIA S. ANANTHARAMAN1, G. P. WILSON2, D. C. DAS SARMA1, W. A. CLEMENS3, 1Palaeontology Division, Geological Survey of India, Hyderabad, 500-068 India, [email protected]; 2Corresponding author, Department of Earth Sciences, Denver Museum of Nature & Science, 2001 Colorado Boulevard., Denver, Colorado 80205-5798 U.S.A., [email protected]; 3Museum of Paleontology and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-4780 U.S.A., [email protected] A new specimen from India represents the first mammal described Cretaceous specimen. The orientation adopted below should be consid- Lameta Formation), the first record of ered a working hypothesis adopted for the convenience of description. Its ס) from the Infratrappean beds “Haramiyida” from the subcontinent, and as much as a 90-million-year testing awaits further discoveries. extension of the temporal range of this poorly known group. The speci- Institutional Abbreviation—GSI/SR/PAL, Geological Survey of In- men is part of a collection of mammalian fossils from the Infra- and dia, Southern Region (Hyderabad), Palaeontology Division, which is the Intertrappean beds of Andhra Pradesh, India (Maastrichtian) that in- repository of the specimen. cludes more than 60 isolated teeth, dentulous jaws, and postcranial ele- ments of several new eutherians and at least one gondwanatherian. Here SYSTEMATIC PALEONTOLOGY we describe the isolated molariform from the collection and provisionally refer it to a new genus and species of ‘Haramiyida.’ The remainder of the ALLOTHERIA Marsh, 1880 collection will be described elsewhere.
  • University of Birmingham Mass Extinctions Drove Increased Global

    University of Birmingham Mass Extinctions Drove Increased Global

    University of Birmingham Mass extinctions drove increased global faunal cosmopolitanism on the supercontinent Pangaea Button, David; Lloyd, Graeme; Ezcurra, Martin; Butler, Richard License: Creative Commons: Attribution (CC BY) Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Button, D, Lloyd, G, Ezcurra, M & Butler, R 2017, 'Mass extinctions drove increased global faunal cosmopolitanism on the supercontinent Pangaea', Nature Communications, vol. 8, 733. <https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-017-00827-7> Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive.
  • Early Jurassic Allotherians from South Wales (United Kingdom)

    Early Jurassic Allotherians from South Wales (United Kingdom)

    Fossil Record 10(1) (2007), 50–59 / DOI 10.1002/mmng.200600018 Early Jurassic allotherians from South Wales (United Kingdom) William A. Clemens* Museum of Paleontology, 1101 Valley Life Sciences Building, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-4780, U.S.A. Received 7 June 2006, accepted 5 July 2006 Published online 30 January 2007 With 6 figures and 1 table Key words: Thomasia, Allotheria, Haramiyidae, Mammalia, Taxonomy, Early Jurassic, South Wales. Abstract Fossils from two fissure fillings in Pant Quarry (designated Pant 4 and Pant 5), South Wales, United Kingdom, probably of Early Jurassic age document a taxonomically diverse vertebrate fauna, the Morganucodon-sphenodont fauna, composed of several kinds of reptiles, non-mammalian synapsids, and mammals. Six isolated molariform teeth from Pant 4 and 5 fissures clearly record the presence of Thomasia (Mammalia, Allotheria, Haramiyidae), a genus previously known only from pur- ported Late Triassic faunas of southwestern England, France, Belgium, Luxemburg, Germany, and Switzerland. Small morpho- logical differences from teeth in the larger English and continental European samples warrant identification of the Welsh material as Thomasia cf. moorei. The highly derived morphology of an isolated molariform tooth from Pant 5 fissure indicates the presence of another, possibly allotherian, taxon. Schlu¨ sselwo¨ rter: Thomasia, Allotheria, Haramiyidae, Mammalia, Taxonomie, Unterer Jura, Su¨ d-Wales. Zusammenfassung Fossilien aus zwei wahrscheinlich unterjurassischen Spaltenfu¨
  • (Mammalia, Allotheria) from the Mesozoic of Gondwana

    (Mammalia, Allotheria) from the Mesozoic of Gondwana

    Mitt . Mus. Nat.kd. Berl ., Geowiss. Reihe 2 (1999) 159-170 19.10.1999 First Haramiyid (Mammalia, Allotheria) from the Mesozoic of Gondwana Wolf-Dieter Heinrich' With 5 figures Abstract A haramiyid tooth is described from the Upper Jurassic of Tendaguru in southwestern Tanzania, East Africa. The specimen, identified tentatively as a lower posterior premolar, is made the holotype of a new taxon, Staffia aenigmatica gen. et sp. nov. which is placed in the Haramiyida . Staffa gen. nov. shares several features with Thomasia from the Late Triassic to Early Jurassic of Europe, notably the arrangement of cusps in two parallel longitudinal rows bordering a central basin, cusp height which progressively decreases in both rows posteriorly, the different height of the rows, the U-shaped posterior rim, and the smooth enamel surface. The main difference between these taxa is the presence of well-developed synclines with rounded floors in Staffia gen. nov., especially that of the principal syncline LS 1. Resemblances in the basic tooth crown pattern indicate that occlusion and chewing might have been similar in both genera, but the synclines in Staffia gen . nov. suggest some subtle differences in food processing. Stafffa aenigmatica gen. et sp . nov. is the first record of a haramiyid from Gondwana, and also the youngest stratigraphic occurrence for this allotherian group so far. Key words: Mammalia, Allotheria, Haramiyida, Upper Jurassic, Tendaguru, Tanzania, East Africa . Zusammenfassung Ein unterer Backenzahn aus den oberjurassischen Tendaguru-Schichten von Tansania in Ostafrika wird als Stafffa aenigmatica gen. et sp . nov. beschrieben und zu den Haramiyida gestellt . Bei dem Fund handelt es sich wahrscheinlich um einen hinteren unteren Prämolaren .