DOCSLIB.ORG

Midterm Evaluation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Midterm Evaluation TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS .......................................................................................................................................................................... ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................. iii I. BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Context ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Project Description ..................................................................................................................................... 1 II. EVALUATION OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................ 4 2.1 Evaluation Objectives ................................................................................................................................ 4 2.2 Scope and Intended Users ........................................................................................................................ 4 2.3 Methodology .................................................................................................................................................. 4 2.4 Evaluation Limitations .............................................................................................................................. 6 III. EVALUATION FINDINGS ......................................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Relevance and Validity of Project Design .......................................................................................... 7 3.2 Project Effectiveness ............................................................................................................................... 20 3.3 Efficiency of Resource Use .................................................................................................................... 27 3.4 Sustainability .............................................................................................................................................. 32 IV. MAIN CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................................. 33 V. LESSONS LEARNED AND GOOD PRACTICES ................................................................................................ 35 5.1 Good Practices ........................................................................................................................................... 35 5.2 Lessons Learned ....................................................................................................................................... 35 VI. RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................................................................... 37 ANNEXES ANNEX 1: Overview of Project Progress in Nepal ............................................................................................ 39 ANNEX 2: Evaluation Terms of Reference .......................................................................................................... 45 ANNEX 3: Evaluation Question Matrix ................................................................................................................. 66 ANNEX 4: List of Documents Reviewed ............................................................................................................... 81 ANNEX 5: Schedule of Field Visits and Other Stakeholder Meetings ....................................................... 83 ANNEX 6: Stakeholder Workshop Agenda and Participants ....................................................................... 84 ANNEX 7: Good Practice Case Study ...................................................................................................................... 85 i ACRONYMS ARCH Actions to Reduce Child Labor Project (Liberia) CEACR ILO Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations CL Child Labor CLEAR II Country Level Engagement and Assistance to Reduce Child Labor II CLMS Child Labor Monitoring System CMEP Comprehensive Monitoring and Evaluation Plan CRC UN Convention on the Rights of the Child CSO Civil Society Organization DMP Disaster Management Plan (Nepal) DoL Department of Labor (Nepal) GLP Global Learning Platform IAC International Advisory Council IAWG-CL Inter-Agency Working Group on Child Labor (Nepal) ILO International Labor Organization ILS International Labor Standards IO Intermediate Objective LI Labor Inspection ILAB International Labor Affairs Bureau LRC Legal Reform Committee LWOB Lawyers Without Borders M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MOL Ministry of Labor (Burkina Faso) MOLE Ministry of Labor and Employment (Nepal) NACOMAL National Commission Against Child Labor (Liberia) NAP National Action Plan NGO Non-Governmental Organization NMP National Master Plan (Nepal) NPC National Planning Commission (Nepal) NSC National Steering Committee (Burkina Faso) PAN/PFTE National Action Plan to Combat the Worst Forms of Child Labor (Burkina Faso) PMP Performance Monitoring Plan RAP Regional Action Plan SAARC South Asia Association for Regional Cooperation SAIEVAC South Asia Initiative to End Violence Against Children SFS Sistemas, Familias y Sociedad – Consultores Asociados SCA Solicitation for Cooperative Agreement SO Supporting Objective TA Technical Assistance TDA Trade and Development Act ToC Theory of Change TOR Terms of Reference TPR Technical Progress Report USDOL United States Department of Labor WFCL Worst Forms of Child Labor ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report documents the main findings and conclusions of an independent interim evaluation of Country Level Engagement and Assistance to Reduce Child Labor II (CLEAR II), a four-year, United States Department of Labor (USDOL)-funded project that aims to support a global reduction in child labor (CL). The project, with a total budget of US$7,000,000 not including an additional US$294,000 of cost sharing, was initiated on September 30, 2014 and is currently scheduled to close on September 29, 2018. It is being implemented by Winrock International and its partners Verité International and Lawyers Without Borders (LWOB). CLEAR II proposes to partner with the governments of at least eight countries to enhance their capacity to reduce child labor in four main areas: (1) Strengthening legal frameworks in harmony with International Labor Standards; (2) Improving monitoring and enforcement of laws and regulations prohibiting child labor; (3) Implementation of national plans on child labor; and (4) Strengthening social programs and services that address the root causes of child labor. The interim evaluation assessed the project’s implementation since its launch in October 2014 until the time of the evaluation (February/March 2017), covering approximately the first 29 of the 48 months of the project. The evaluation findings, good practices, lessons learned, conclusions and recommendations are primarily intended for USDOL, Winrock and its partners. A team of three international consultants carried out the interim evaluation using document review, performance analysis and face-to-face interviews with national stakeholders in three countries (Nepal, Burkina Faso, and Liberia), with project management and USDOL representatives in Washington DC, and through calls to other stakeholders in Honduras, Mozambique, India and Geneva, among other places. The evaluators used the following evaluation criteria in their analysis of project achievements and outcomes to date: (a) relevance and validity of project design, (b) project effectiveness, (c) efficiency of resource use, and (d) sustainability. The evaluation was framed by the key evaluation questions contained in the evaluation Terms of Reference (TOR) (see Annex 2). Summary of Evaluation Findings At the time of the interim evaluation, CLEAR II had made limited progress against its overall objectives. The project was operational in one out of the eight countries planned to receive CLEAR II support. In Nepal, it had made moderate progress despite the massive earthquake that struck the country one day after the project’s official launch in Kathmandu. In contrast, in Burkina Faso, the other country that the project planned to provide with assistance early on, start-up was delayed for over two years due to political instability and security concerns. CLEAR II carried out a short intervention in one other country (Honduras) that was ended prematurely. Out of the five additional countries slated to receive project assistance, only Liberia has been formally approved to be added to the project with other beneficiary country candidates still in various stages of negotiation at the time of the evaluation. iii Relevance and Validity of Project Design Consistency of project objectives with national stakeholder needs: Although CLEAR II’s multi- country Theory of Change and results framework are coherent, the interim evaluation findings highlight the need to adapt project interventions to the opportunities, constraints and priority needs of stakeholders in each recipient country. Moreover, the project design’s entry point for establishing country level assistance strategies, which proposes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Law and Reality RIGHTS Progress in Judicial Reform in Rwanda WATCH
    Rwanda HUMAN Law and Reality RIGHTS Progress in Judicial Reform in Rwanda WATCH Law and Reality Progress in Judicial Reform in Rwanda Copyright © 2008 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-366-8 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org July 2008 1-56432-366-8 Law and Reality Progress in Judicial Reform in Rwanda I. Summary......................................................................................................................... 1 II. Methodology..................................................................................................................6 III. Recommendations........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Women in Conflict in Cabo Delgado: Understanding Vicious Cycles of Violence
    RURAL OBSERVER Nº 114 MAY 202 1 The Role of Women in Conflict in Cabo Delgado: Understanding Vicious Cycles of Violence (English Version) João Feijó www.omrmz.org This study was carried out by the Observatory of Rural Areas with the support from Friedrich Ebert Stiftung d Secur n ity a e S c e a r i e e s P FES João Feijó The Role of Women in the Conflict in Cabo Delgado: Understanding Vicious Cycles of Violence João Feijó The Role of Women in the Conflict in Cabo Delgado: Understanding Vicious Cycles of Violence About the Author João Feijó is a sociologist and PhD in African Studies, having researched on identities, social representations, labor relations, and migrations in Mozambique. He is the coordinator of the technical council of the Observatory for the Rural Environment, where he coordinates the research line on “Poverty, inequalities and conflicts”. The article results from a research of the Observatory for Rural Environment (Observatório do Meio Rural - OMR) in cooperation with the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. Cover Art Artwork of Malangatana Ngwenya AD 1626, without a title. Published with the autorization of the Center for Photographic Documentation and Training (Centro de Documentação e Formação Fotografica - FCF). Imprint Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Peace and Security Competence Centre Sub-Saharan Africa Point E, boulevard de l’Est, Villa n°30 P.O. Box 15416 Dakar-Fann, Senegal Tel.: +221 33 859 20 02 Fax: +221 33 864 49 31 Email: [email protected] www.fes-pscc.org © Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung 2021 Layout: Green Eyez Design SARL, www.greeneyezdesign.com Cover art: Malangatana Ngwenya ISBN: 978-2-490093-28-1 Commercial use of all media published by the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES) is not permitted without the written consent of the FES.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Trafficking in the United States Susan Burke Good Morning, I Am Susan Burke
    Human Trafficking in the United States Susan Burke Good morning, I am Susan Burke. I am a state court judge from Minneapolis, Minnesota. I am honored to be here with you today. Minnesota is on the northern border of the United States, halfway between the east and west coasts. I am especially glad to be here today because my house is already covered in snow, and the high temperature today is about 0 degrees Fahrenheit (or -18 degrees Celsius). Judge Ann Williams wanted to be here today. However, a training program for the entire judiciary of Zambia was unexpectedly moved to this week. Like all of us, Judge Williams is committed to eradicating modern slavery, preserving and protecting the dignity of the human body; fighting the “Globalization of Indifference,” and promoting justice and the common good. Let’s turn now to human trafficking in the United States. In the United States, increased awareness of human trafficking is shifting public perception. Where people used to see children and women as criminals and voluntary sex workers, more people now recognize them as victims of crime. The Victims of Trafficking and Violence Prevention Act (TVPA), passed in 2000, provided a holistic approach to countering human trafficking. The TVPA focuses on prevention by raising awareness both domestically and internationally. It increases protection for victims. It enhances prosecution of traffickers. Under the TVPA, the U.S. Department of State issues a Trafficking in Persons (TIP) Report. The State Department collects data on human trafficking from governments around the world and sorts them into three tiers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Statistical Consultant, We Present Two Articles on Pro Bono Consulting Efforts Being Made by the Statistical Consulting Community
    THE STATISTICAL CONSULTANT Section on Statistical Consulting American Statistical Association Christopher Holloman, Editor; Sarah Butler, Assistant Editor Winter 2010; Volume 27, No. 1 IN THIS ISSUE • Special Focus: Pro Bono Consulting • Introducing Statistics Without Borders • Update: Statistics in the Community • ASA Now Accepting Nominations for the W.J. Dixon Award for Excellence in Statistical Consulting • Statistics Resource Available for Purchase • Comments from the Past Chair • Comments from the Chair • Notes from the Editor Special Focus: Pro Bono Consulting Christopher Holloman , The Ohio State University 1 In this issue of The Statistical Consultant, we present two articles on pro bono consulting efforts being made by the statistical consulting community. In the first article, Jim Cochran provides an overview of Statistics Without Borders, a group providing statistical consulting to non-profit organizations around the world. In the second article, Meghan Honerlaw provides an update on Statistics in the Community (StatCom), the graduate student-run pro bono consulting program originating from Purdue University. 1 [email protected] Executive Committee of the ASA Section on Statistical Consulting Chair : Todd G. Nick, [email protected] Chair-Elect : James Grady, [email protected] Past Chair : Bruce Craig, [email protected] Program Chair (for 2010 JSM) : Walter Ambrosius, [email protected] Program Chair-Elect (for 2011 JSM) : Richard Ittenbach, [email protected] Secretary / Treasurer : Brenda Gillespie, [email protected] Publications Officer : Cynthia R. Long, [email protected] Webmaster : Chuck Kincaid, [email protected] Newsletter Editor : Christopher Holloman, [email protected] Assistant Newsletter Editor : Sarah Butler, [email protected] At Large Members : Larry D.
    [Show full text]
  • THESIS Version 12 Oktober 2012
    DISSERTATION Titel der Dissertation Traces of Inspiration - The Usage of Foreign Citations by Supreme Courts Verfasserin Mag.a iur. Marianne Schulze, LL.M. angestrebter akademischer Grad Doktorin der Rechtswissenschaften (Dr.in iur.) Wien, 2012 Studienkennzahl lt. A 083 101 Studienblatt: Dissertationsgebiet lt. Rechtswissenschaften Studienblatt: Betreuerin / Betreuer: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Clemens Jabloner IN MEMORIAM ROSINA SALZNER. ii iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS VII I. INTRODUCTION & THESIS 1 II. WHAT IS COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW? 3 1. Borrowing and other “Transfers” of Foreign Law(s) 4 2. The Institutionalization of Comparative Law 8 3. The Comparative “Method”? 12 4. Comparative Constitutionalism 15 5. Interim Findings 16 III. THE CURRENT EXCITEMENT ABOUT COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 18 1. “Globalization” 18 2. Human Rights 21 Excursus: The European Court of Human Rights 26 3. Dialogue of Judges 28 4. Interim Findings 29 IV. EXCEPTIONS TO THE CURRENT EXCITEMENT 31 1. The first special case: United States of America 31 a. Moods, Fads & Fashions: Recent Cases 32 b. Well Acquainted: A History of References 43 2. The Second Special Case: Austria by way of Germany 45 3. Interim Findings 52 V. PROBLEMS AND LIMITS OF COMPARATIVE LAW 54 1. Language 54 2. Structural limits 55 3. Transnational Law 56 4. Legal Families 57 5. Legal Culture 58 iv 6. “Civilized” World 59 7. Legal Imperialism 61 8. Civil and Common Law 64 9. Method(s) of Comparative Law 67 10. Functionalism 71 11. Selection 75 12. Providing Context 78 13. Interim Findings 82 VI. PURPOSE OF COMPARATIVE LAW 83 1. Predisposition of Judges 86 2. Legitimacy 88 Excursus: The (In)voluntary Nature of Comparative Constitutionalism 92 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Values Into Community Action Pro Bono and Community Affairs Annual Report 2007/2008
    Values into Community Action Pro Bono and Community Affairs Annual Report 2007/2008 2007-2008 I Values into Community Action Values into Community Action Pro Bono and Community Affairs Annual Report 2007/2008 Allen & Overy LLP One Bishops Square London E1 6AD United Kingdom Tel +44 (0)20 3088 0000 Fax +44 (0)20 3088 0088 © Allen & Overy LLP 2008 1 Values into Community Action | 2007-2008 2 © Allen & Overy LLP 2008 2007-2008 I Values into Community Action CONTENTS page INTRODUCTION 4 GLOBAL 6 PRO BONO & COMMUNITY WORK WORLDWIDE 10 Belgium 10 China 12 Czech Republic 14 France 15 Germany 17 Hong Kong 19 Hungary 27 Italy 28 Japan 29 Luxembourg 30 Netherlands 32 Poland 35 Russia 36 Singapore 37 Slovak Republic 38 Spain 40 Thailand 40 United Arab Emirates 42 United States 42 UNITED KINGDOM – COMMUNITY WORK 47 Education 47 General Community Work 58 Client Collaboration Projects 59 Work Placements 66 Community Partner of the Year 67 A&O Foundation 70 Give As You Earn 70 UNITED KINGDOM – PRO BONO WORK 70 Advisory Work 70 We Are What We Do 77 Human Rights Work 77 LawWorks 85 Private Client Department 85 US Law Group 86 Pro Bono Work in the East End 87 Business Development Mentoring Network 91 APPENDICES 92 Pro Bono and Community Work Policy 92 Pro Bono Statistics 95 Awards 97 Global Community Contacts 99 © Allen & Overy LLP 2008 3 Values into Community Action | 2007-2008 INTRODUCTION Welcome to the Pro Bono and Community Affairs Annual Report 2007/2008. Allen & Overy has an extensive global programme – Values into Community Action – which is an important part of who we are and the values we espouse.
    [Show full text]
  • Speke Resort Munyonyo • Kampala, Uganda August 26–28, 2015
    Speke Resort Munyonyo • Kampala, Uganda August 26–28, 2015 Research for The Long Road: Accountability for Sexual Violence in Conflict and Post-Conflict Settings was made possible by the generous support of: Open Society Foundations, Women’s Rights Program John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Humanity United August 26, 2015 Distinguished Participants, Welcome to Kampala. Thanks to the MacArthur Foundation, the Open Society Foundation, and the Norwegian Embassy in Kampala, we are gathered for this “Missing Peace Practitioners’ Workshop” to: 1. Review new research by the University of California – Berkeley’s Human Rights Center regarding challenges and strategies in reporting, investigating, and prosecuting sexual violence in conflict and post-conflict settings; 2. Workshop potential improvement of policies and practices to better respond to survivors of sexual violence during future emergency periods; 3. Exchange promising practices and lessons learned regarding the ability of local actors to recognize, investigate, and prosecute sexual violence committed as an international crime. We are honored to be convening such a distinguished group of key actors. As medical care pro- viders, police officers, forensic analysts, prosecutors, judges, policymakers and community-based organizations, you represent the front lines of response to sexual violence in your respective countries. You and your colleagues are the most important actors in the fight against sexual vio- lence day in and day out; no fight against “conflict-related sexual violence” or “rape as a weapon of war” is complete without your input and action. To harness your collective expertise, we have organized a dynamic series of discussions that will illuminate potential strategies to improving accountability for sexual violence, including that which occurs during periods of armed conflict or other political unrest.
    [Show full text]
  • User's Guide to Democracy, Human Rights and Governance Programming
    USER’S GUIDE TO DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS AND GOVERNANCE PROGRAMMING User’s Guide to DRG Programming 1 February 2019 An Overview: The Center of Excellence on Democracy, Human Rights and Governance (DRG) User’s Guide to DRG Programming In 2012, USAID formally launched the Center of Excellence on Democracy, Human Rights and Governance (DRG Center). The creation of the DRG Center resulted from the U.S. Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review (QDDR), which explicitly stated the need for USAID to establish the Center as the primary means of elevating and integrating democracy, human rights and governance within the Agency’s overall development portfolio. The DRG Center exercises broad oversight over the global $2.3 billion democracy, human rights, and governance Congressional budget directive, most of which is implemented by USAID. The DRG Center has a mission statement to “promote peace, prosperity, and freedom around the world through self-reliant, citizen responsive democratic government that respects human dignity, rights and rule of law.” The DRG Center organizes its work to achieve the three following strategic objectives: 1) Learn: Increase knowledge concerning the global advancement of DRG; 2) Serve: Improve the quality and impact of DRG technical assistance to the field; and 3) Influence: Elevate the role of DRG in key USAID, USG and multilateral strategies, policies and budgets. With a strong emphasis on rigorous learning, the DRG Center will promote and support evidence-based DRG programming. This User’s Guide to DRG Programming has been crafted to serve as a fundamental reference tool for USAID missions and bureaus to utilize in pursuit of advancing democracy, human rights and good governance.
    [Show full text]
  • Globalization and United States Law Practice
    Washington University Global Studies Law Review Volume 13 Issue 3 The Legal Challenges of Globalization: A View from the Heartland (Symposium Edition) 2014 Globalization and United States Law Practice Frank L. Steeves Emerson Electric Company Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_globalstudies Part of the Business Organizations Law Commons, Commercial Law Commons, International Law Commons, Legal Education Commons, and the Legal Profession Commons Recommended Citation Frank L. Steeves, Globalization and United States Law Practice, 13 WASH. U. GLOBAL STUD. L. REV. 469 (2014), https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_globalstudies/vol13/iss3/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Global Studies Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GLOBALIZATION AND UNITED STATES LAW PRACTICE FRANK L. STEEVES ABSTRACT This Article advances the idea that globalization of law is inevitable and that legal education and experience in the United States uniquely prepares attorneys to practice in an increasingly global legal environment. The reason is that the United States, with its fifty sovereign states, has allowed for the development of a full range of legal approaches to most modern business issues. As the laws and practices in other countries change to keep pace with the globalization of business, the results are often a reflection of elements previously debated, accepted, or rejected in one or more U.S. jurisdictions. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. GLOBALIZATION OF BUSINESS ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Violence Against Children with Disabilities
    OUT FROM THE shadows SEXUAL VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES draft Save the Children works in more than 120 countries. We save children’s lives. We fight for their rights. We help them fulfil their potential. Handicap International is an international federation specialised in the field of disability. Non-governmental, non-religious, non-political and non-profit making, it works alongside people with disabilities, whatever the context, offering them assistance and supporting them in their efforts to become self-reliant. Since its creation, the organisation has set up programmes in approximately 60 countries and intervened in many emergency situations. It has a network of eight national associations (Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Switzerland, United Kingdom, USA). Published by Save the Children UK 1 St John’s Lane London EC1M 4AR UK +44 (0)20 7012 6400 savethechildren.org.uk First published 2011 © The Save the Children Fund 2011 The Save the Children Fund is a charity registered in England and Wales (213890) and Scotland (SC039570). Registered Company No. 178159 This publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee or prior permission for teaching purposes, but not for resale. For copying in any other circumstances, prior written permission must be obtained from the publisher, and a fee may be payable. Cover photo: [???] (Photo: [???]) Typeset by Grasshopper Design Company Printed by [???] CONTENTS Acknowledgements iv Executive summary vi Introduction viii Part 1: Background 1 1. Violence against children with disabilities: a global overview 1 The scale of violence against children with disabilities 1 The roots of violence 4 Barriers to protecting children with disabilities 5 2.
    [Show full text]
  • RSF Safety Guide for Journalists
    SAFETY GUIDE FOR JOURNALISTS A handbook for reporters in high-risk environments United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization REPORTERS WITHOUT BORDERS 1 REPORTERS WITHOUT BORDERS 1 SAFETY GUIDE FOR JOURNALISTS A handbook for reporters in high-risk environments United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization CONTENTS PREFACE...........................................................................................................................................4 INTRODUCTION: RSF and the protection of journalists...........................9 CHAPTER 1: The growing risks for journalists................................................12 CHAPTER 2: Planning and preparation..................................................................14 1. Local knowledge and risk assessment..................................................14 2. Health precautions.................................................................................................17 3. First aid and hostile environment training...........................................19 4. Finances, formalities, family: set off with peace of mind.......19 5. Preparing your kitbag: checklists...............................................................22 CHAPTER 3: Keeping safe on assignment........................................................29 1. Accommodation, travel and communications..................................29 2. Safety precautions in war zones.................................................................34 3. Mines and cluster munitions..........................................................................43
    [Show full text]
  • 20-07-50 Jones Parcher
    CorporateThe Metropolitan Counsel® www.metrocorpcounsel.com Volume 20, No. 7 © 2012 The Metropolitan Corporate Counsel, Inc. July/August 2012 Jones Day: Pro Bono Without Borders The Editor interviews Laura Tuell our lawyers spend on On an international level, in addition to Parcher, Firmwide Partner-in-Charge of our pro bono cases PILPG, Lawyers Without Borders is a Pro Bono, Jones Day. count identically to favorite nonprofit. We’ve drawn in lawyers those spent on paying from several of our international and Editor: Laura, you have been Jones cases, both in terms of domestic offices to work together on mod- Day’s firmwide partner-in-charge of pro attorney evaluations ules for the trainings LWOB does in bono since 2008. What are your proud- and the compensation Kenya, and we’re also working on an est accomplishments during this time they receive. We inheritance and succession law project in period? encourage our Namibia. There, when the head of house- lawyers to do pro Laura Tuell hold male dies, all of his assets may tradi- Parcher: Overall there’s been significant bono work and sup- Parcher tionally go to his oldest living relative, who growth in pro bono for the entire firm, port them in the wide range of causes they might be an uncle with no interest in the which has been very rewarding and amaz- choose. wife or the children, resulting in the neglect ing to watch. While I undertake a fair of countless families. LWOB is helping amount of administrative work to manage Editor: What new areas of pro bono has Namibia not only improve its laws to pro- the program, I work with lawyers across the firm participated in over the last two tect these family members but also to edu- the globe who are undertaking increasing years? cate the public and implement more amounts of pro bono work, and seeing the effectively the succession laws they do results of their efforts is inspiring.
    [Show full text]