DOCSLIB.ORG

West Seti Hydroelectric Project (WSHEP)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
West Seti Hydroelectric Project (WSHEP) Resettlement Planning Document Resettlement Plan Document Stage: Draft Project Number: 40919 November 2008 NEP: WEST SETI HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT Reservoir Area and Downstream Project Components Prepared by West Seti Hydro Limited for the Asian Development Bank (ADB). The resettlement plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. WEST SETI HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Volume 3 RESETTLEMENT PLAN: RESERVOIR AREA AND DOWNSTREAM PROJECT COMPONENTS West Seti Hydro Limited 1611 Lamtangin Marg, Maharajgunj Kathmandu, Nepal October 2008 (Revision 4) WEST SETI HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT RESETTLEMENT PLAN: RESERVOIR AREA AND DOWNSTREAM PROJECT COMPONENTS (Rev-4) TABLE OF CONTENTS SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ............................................................................................................................. V LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................................................... V LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................ VII LIST OF PHOTOS ................................................................................................................................................ VII ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................................................. VIII GLOSSARY OF LOCAL TERMS ......................................................................................................................... IX LAND CONVERSIONS AND TERMINOLOGY .............................................................................................. X EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................... XI 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 PROJECT STUDIES ..................................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 PROJECT IMPACTS..................................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 AIMS OF THE RESETTLEMENT PLAN ........................................................................................................ 1-3 1.5 REPORT LAYOUT ...................................................................................................................................... 1-4 2. METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 EIA RESEARCH AND DATA COLLECTION ............................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 FOLLOW-UP RESEARCH, DATA COLLECTION AND CONSULTATION ..................................................... 2-2 2.3 CONSTRAINTS AND LIMITATIONS ............................................................................................................ 2-4 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 PROJECT COMPONENTS............................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.2 CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMME ................................................................................................................. 3-5 4. THE SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................................................ 4-1 4.1 REGIONAL CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................ 4-1 4.1.1 Population and Demography ............................................................................................................ 4-1 4.1.2 Caste/Ethnicity ................................................................................................................................. 4-2 4.1.3 Development Context ....................................................................................................................... 4-3 4.1.4 Economic Activities and Livelihoods ................................................................................................ 4-3 4.1.5 Poverty .............................................................................................................................................. 4-5 4.2 PROJECT AREA ......................................................................................................................................... 4-6 4.2.1 Settlement Patterns .......................................................................................................................... 4-6 4.2.2 Access and Movement Patterns ........................................................................................................ 4-8 4.2.3 Population and Demography ............................................................................................................ 4-9 4.2.4 Education ........................................................................................................................................ 4-12 4.2.5 Health and Sanitation ..................................................................................................................... 4-14 4.2.6 Land Tenure and Landholdings ...................................................................................................... 4-15 4.2.7 Use of Forest and Other Natural Resources ................................................................................... 4-17 4.2.8 Seti River Use ................................................................................................................................. 4-17 4.2.9 Occupational Patterns and Livelihoods .......................................................................................... 4-18 4.2.10 Income and Expenditure ................................................................................................................. 4-22 4.2.11 Poverty ............................................................................................................................................ 4-25 WEST SETI HYDRO LTD. OCTOBER 2008 I WEST SETI HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT RESETTLEMENT PLAN: RESERVOIR AREA AND DOWNSTREAM PROJECT COMPONENTS (Rev-4) 4.2.12 Vulnerable Groups/Social Categories ............................................................................................. 4-26 5. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT ............................................................... 5-1 5.1 RATIONALE FOR LAND ACQUISITION ..................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1.1 Motivation for the Project................................................................................................................. 5-1 5.1.2 Project Type and Design Alternatives .............................................................................................. 5-1 5.1.3 Efforts to Minimise Land Acquisition and Resettlement ................................................................. 5-2 5.2 PROJECT LAND REQUIREMENT ................................................................................................................ 5-2 5.3 KEY SOCIAL ISSUES AND IMPACTS ........................................................................................................... 5-3 5.4 HOUSEHOLDS AND POPULATION ............................................................................................................ 5-4 5.5 PRIVATE LAND ......................................................................................................................................... 5-8 5.6 POPULATION DISPLACEMENT AND RESETTLEMENT ............................................................................... 5-9 5.7 BUILDINGS/STRUCTURES .......................................................................................................................... 5-9 5.7.1 Houses and Buildings ....................................................................................................................... 5-9 5.7.2 Schools ............................................................................................................................................ 5-11 5.7.3 Other Social Infrastructure ............................................................................................................ 5-12 5.8 TREES ...................................................................................................................................................... 5-14 5.9 FOREST AND RIVER RESOURCES ............................................................................................................ 5-15 5.10 SOCIAL IMPACTS OF ALTERED RIVER FLOWS ........................................................................................ 5-15 5.11 ACCESS
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Food Security Bulletin 29
    Nepal Food Security Bulletin Issue 29, October 2010 The focus of this edition is on the Mid and Far Western Hill and Mountain region Situation summary Figure 1. Percentage of population food insecure* 26% This Food Security Bulletin covers the period July-September and is focused on the Mid and Far Western Hill and Mountain (MFWHM) 24% region (typically the most food insecure region of the country). 22% July – August is an agricultural lean period in Nepal and typically a season of increased food insecurity. In addition, flooding and 20% landslides caused by monsoon regularly block transportation routes and result in localised crop losses. 18 % During the 2010 monsoon 1,600 families were reportedly 16 % displaced due to flooding, the Karnali Highway and other trade 14 % routes were blocked by landslides and significant crop losses were Oct -Dec Jan-M ar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct -Dec Jan-M ar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep reported in Kanchanpur, Dadeldhura, western Surkhet and south- 08 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 eastern Udayapur. NeKSAP District Food Security Networks in MFWHM districts Rural Nepal Mid-Far-Western Hills&Mountains identified 163 VDCs in 12 districts that are highly food insecure. Forty-four percent of the population in Humla and Bajura are reportedly facing a high level of food insecurity. Other districts with households that are facing a high level of food insecurity are Mugu, Kalikot, Rukum, Surkhet, Achham, Doti, Bajhang, Baitadi, Dadeldhura and Darchula. These households have both very limited food stocks and limited financial resources to purchase food. Most households are coping by reducing consumption, borrowing money or food and selling assets.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Security Bulletin - 21
    Food Security Bulletin - 21 United Nations World Food Programme FS Bulletin, November 2008 Food Security Monitoring and Analysis System Issue 21 Highlights Over the period July to September 2008, the number of people highly and severely food insecure increased by about 50% compared to the previous quarter due to severe flooding in the East and Western Terai districts, roads obstruction because of incessant rainfall and landslides, rise in food prices and decreased production of maize and other local crops. The food security situation in the flood affected districts of Eastern and Western Terai remains precarious, requiring close monitoring, while in the majority of other districts the food security situation is likely to improve in November-December due to harvesting of the paddy crop. Decreased maize and paddy production in some districts may indicate a deteriorating food insecurity situation from January onwards. this period. However, there is an could be achieved through the provision Overview expectation of deteriorating food security of return packages consisting of food Mid and Far-Western Nepal from January onwards as in most of the and other essentials as well as A considerable improvement in food Hill and Mountain districts excessive agriculture support to restore people’s security was observed in some Hill rainfall, floods, landslides, strong wind, livelihoods. districts such as Jajarkot, Bajura, and pest diseases have badly affected In the Western Terai, a recent rapid Dailekh, Rukum, Baitadi, and Darchula. maize production and consequently assessment conducted by WFP in These districts were severely or highly reduced food stocks much below what is November, revealed that the food food insecure during April - July 2008 normally expected during this time of the security situation is still critical in because of heavy loss in winter crops, year.
    [Show full text]
  • Download 4.06 MB
    Environmental Compliance Monitoring Report Semi-Annual Report Project Number: 44214-024 Grant Number: 0357-NEP July 2020 Nepal: Building Climate Resilience of Watersheds in Mountain Eco-Regions Project Prepared by the Government of Nepal for the Asian Development Bank. This environmental Compliance Monitoring Report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Government of Nepal Department of Forests and Soil Conservation Building Climate Resilience of Watersheds in Mountain Eco-Regions (BCRWME) Project (ADB Loan/Grant No.: GO357/0358-NEP) Semiannual Environemntal Monitoring Report of BCRWME Sub-projects (January to June 2020) Preparaed By BCRWME Project Project Management Unit Dadeldhura July, 2020 ABBREVIATION ADB : Asian Development Bank BCRWME : Building Climate Resilience of Watersheds in Mountain Eco- Regions BOQ : Bills of Quantity CDG : Community Development Group CFUG : Community Forest User Group CO : Community Organizer CPC : Consultation, Participation and Communications (Plan) CS : Construction Supervisor DDR : Due Diligence
    [Show full text]
  • CONNECT Component Review
    CONNECT component review CONNECT component review Date: 4 May 2020 Authors: Gordon Freer and Edward Hedley Submitted by Itad Itad 4 May 2020 CONNECT component review Acknowledgements The review team acknowledges the support of the Connect programme team in providing documentation and helping the team to arrange interviews. The review team also expresses thanks to our field team in conducting interviews and collecting data in the field. Disclaimer The views expressed in this report are those of the evaluators. They do not represent those of Connect or of any of the individuals and other organisations referred to in the report. ‘Itad’ and the tri-colour triangles icon are a registered trademark of ITAD Limited. Itad 4 May 2020 i CONNECT component review Contents List of acronyms iii 1. Introduction and scope 1 1.1. CONNECT component background 1 1.2. Review purpose 1 1.3. Review methodology 1 1.4. Review limitations 2 1.5. Structure of the report 2 2. Theoretical framework Error! Bookmark not defined. 2.1. The M4P Theory of Change 3 2.2. The CONNECT Theory of Change 4 2.3. Intervention Theories of Change 5 2.4. Commentary on intervention design 6 3. Findings 8 3.1. Relevance 8 3.2. Effectiveness: were the interventions effective in promoting changes to practice? 11 3.3. Impact: did the changes have value for the beneficiaries? 13 3.4. Sustainability: Are the changes likely to be implemented in the future? 15 4. Conclusion 18 5. Lessons and recommendations 19 List of references 21 Table of respondents 22 Annex A: Case study – Belpata Dairy
    [Show full text]
  • PAHAL) Program
    Promoting Agriculture, Health and Alternative Livelihoods (PAHAL) Program Cooperative Agreement No.: AID-OAA-15-00001 Quarterly Report III (Q3, FY15) 1 April – 30 June, 2015 Submitted to: USAID Nepal Submitted by: Mercy Corps ACRONYMS COP – Chief of Party DCOP – Deputy Chief of Party GESI – Gender and Social Inclusion GoN – Government of Nepal iDE – International Development Enterprises innovATE – Innovation for Agricultural training and Education IPTT – Indicator Performance Tracking Table KISAN – Knowledge-based Integrated Sustainable Agriculture and Nutrition MC – Mercy Corps MoAD – Ministry of Agricultural Development MoFALD – Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development MoHA – Ministry of Home Affairs MoHP – Ministry of Health and Population NGO – Non-Governmental Organization NNFSS – National Nutrition and Food Security Secretariat NPAC – National Advisory Committee Meeting NPC – National Planning Council PAHAL – Promoting Agriculture, Health and Alternative Livelihoods SABAL – Sustainable action for Resilience and Food Security STRESS – Strategic Resilience Assessment SUAAHARA – ‘Good Nutrition’ TSU – Technical Support Unit (Mercy Corps) VDC – Village Development Committee PAHAL Program Overview The PAHAL Program, funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development’s Bureau for Democracy, Conflict and Humanitarian Assistance (DCHA)/Office of Food for Peace (FFP), is a five-year program that commenced in October, 2014. It seeks to strengthen livelihoods, improve nutritional status and increase the capacity of vulnerable households to mitigate, adapt to and recover from shocks and stresses in communities with deep poverty and high rates of malnutrition in critical zones of the Far-Western and Mid-Western Regions of Nepal. In recent years Nepal has made substantial strides toward reducing its overall poverty rate. However, many people in the Middle Hill and Mountain zones of western Nepal continue to struggle with the root causes of food insecurity.
    [Show full text]
  • 44214-024: Building Climate Resilience of Watersheds In
    Building Climate Resilience of Watersheds in Mountain Eco-Regions (RRP NEP 44214) Environmental Assessment and Review Framework ADB TA 7883-NEP July 2013 Nepal: Building Climate Resilience of Watersheds in Mountain Eco-Regions Prepared by Department of Soil Conservation and Watershed Management for the Asian Development Bank CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 1 December 2012) Currency unit – Nepalese Rupee (NR) NR1.00 = $0.0115 $1.00 = NR 86.9 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank CDG – Community Development Group CFUG – Community Forest User Group CPC – Consultation, Participation and Communications (Plan) DAGs – disadvantaged groups DDR – Due Diligence Reports DFO – District Forestry Office DSCO – District Soil Conservation Office DSCWM – Department of Soil Conservation and Watershed Management DSO – DSCO Safeguard Officer DSS – District Safeguard Specialist EARF – Environmental Assessment and Review Framework EIA – Environmental Impact Assessment GESI – Gender Empowerment and Social Inclusion (Plan) GON – Government of Nepal GPP – Grievance Point Person IEE – Initial Environmental Examination MoFSC – Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation NAPA – National Adaptation Program of Action NES – National Environmental Specialist PIC – Project Implementation Consultant PMU – Project Management Unit REA – Rapid Environmental Assessment R/LAP – Resettlement and Land Acquisition Plan SPCR – Strategic Program for Climate Resilience SEU – Social and Environmental Unit SWMC – Sub-watershed Management Committee VDC – Village Development Committee VDT – Village Development Team WEIGHTS AND MEASURES cm – centimeter cu m – cubic meters Ha hectare km – kilometer L – liter m – meter masl – meters above sea level sq m square meter NOTE (i) In this report, "$" refers to US dollars. This environmental assessment and review framework is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study of Kailash Sacred Landscape
    Kailash Sacred Landscape Conservation Initiative Feasability Assessment Report - Nepal Central Department of Botany Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Nepal June 2010 Contributors, Advisors, Consultants Core group contributors • Chaudhary, Ram P., Professor, Central Department of Botany, Tribhuvan University; National Coordinator, KSLCI-Nepal • Shrestha, Krishna K., Head, Central Department of Botany • Jha, Pramod K., Professor, Central Department of Botany • Bhatta, Kuber P., Consultant, Kailash Sacred Landscape Project, Nepal Contributors • Acharya, M., Department of Forest, Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation (MFSC) • Bajracharya, B., International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD) • Basnet, G., Independent Consultant, Environmental Anthropologist • Basnet, T., Tribhuvan University • Belbase, N., Legal expert • Bhatta, S., Department of National Park and Wildlife Conservation • Bhusal, Y. R. Secretary, Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation • Das, A. N., Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation • Ghimire, S. K., Tribhuvan University • Joshi, S. P., Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation • Khanal, S., Independent Contributor • Maharjan, R., Department of Forest • Paudel, K. C., Department of Plant Resources • Rajbhandari, K.R., Expert, Plant Biodiversity • Rimal, S., Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation • Sah, R.N., Department of Forest • Sharma, K., Department of Hydrology • Shrestha, S. M., Department of Forest • Siwakoti, M., Tribhuvan University • Upadhyaya, M.P., National Agricultural Research Council
    [Show full text]
  • 1.2 District Profile Kailali English Final 23 March
    "Environmnet-friendly Development, Maximum Use of Resources and Good Governance Overall Economic, Social and Human Development; Kailali's Pridefulness" Periodic District Development Plan (Fiscal Year 2072/073 − 2076/077) First Part DISTRICT PROFILE (Translated Version) District Development Committee Kailali March 2015 Document : Periodic District Development Plan of Kailali (F/Y 2072/73 - 2076/77) Technical Assistance : USAID/ Sajhedari Bikaas Consultant : Support for Development Initiatives Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. (SDIC), Kathmandu Phone: 01-4421159, Email : [email protected] , Web: www.sdicnepal.org Date March, 2015 Periodic District Development Plan (F/Y 2072/073 - 2076/77) Part One: District Profile Abbreviation Acronyms Full Form FY Fiscal year IFO Area Forest Office SHP Sub Health Post S.L.C. School Leaving Certificate APCCS Agriculture Production Collection Centres | CBS Central Bureau of Statistics VDC Village Development Committee SCIO Small Cottage Industry Office DADO District Agriculture Development Office DVO District Veterinary Office DSDC District Sports Development Committee DM Dhangadhi Municipality PSO Primary Health Post Mun Municipality FCHV Female Community Health Volunteer M Meter MM Milimeter MT Metric Ton TM Tikapur Municipality C Centigrade Rs Rupee H Hectare HPO Health Post HCT HIV/AIDS counselling and Testing i Periodic District Development Plan (F/Y 2072/073 - 2076/77) Part One: District Profile Table of Contents Abbreviation ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal
    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Jiri Pasz.Pdf
    UTRECHT UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF GEOSCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN GEOGRAPHY AND PLANNING INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT STUDIES MASTER OF SCIENCE THESIS The Starting Point in Life Towards inclusive birth registration in Nepal By Jiří Pasz Thesis supervised by Dr. Paul van Lindert 2011 2 Acknowledgements "Tell me, and I will forget. Show me, and I may remember. Involve me, and I will understand." Confucius The research in Nepal was one of my most valuable work and life experiences. I was amazed by the beauty of Nepal and its people. Besides being amazed, I have learned many valuable lessons, many people have influenced my life and I believe I have influenced theirs too. We have become each other’s guides and even friends during this academic adventure. I am first of all grateful to Paul van Lindert who became the mentor of my research and provided critical, yet friendly advice on all issues I had to deal with during the preparation, research and thesis writing. His input and guidance is very precious indeed and I deeply respect his wisdom and experience. Whenever we travel to another part of the world we wish to have someone there who would make ourselves feel welcome. I found such person in my Nepalese supervisor Indira Thapa. Indira not only introduced me to Plan Nepal but she was always helping me with my tasks, always keen and patient to answer my questions. I am grateful to all the other people in Plan office in Kathmandu for being so kind to me, especially to Donal Keane, Subhakar Baidya and Prem Aryal.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
    Chapter 3 Project Evaluation and Recommendations 3-1 Project Effect It is appropriate to implement the Project under Japan's Grant Aid Assistance, because the Project will have the following effects: (1) Direct Effects 1) Improvement of Educational Environment By replacing deteriorated classrooms, which are danger in structure, with rainwater leakage, and/or insufficient natural lighting and ventilation, with new ones of better quality, the Project will contribute to improving the education environment, which will be effective for improving internal efficiency. Furthermore, provision of toilets and water-supply facilities will greatly encourage the attendance of female teachers and students. Present(※) After Project Completion Usable classrooms in Target Districts 19,177 classrooms 21,707 classrooms Number of Students accommodated in the 709,410 students 835,820 students usable classrooms ※ Including the classrooms to be constructed under BPEP-II by July 2004 2) Improvement of Teacher Training Environment By constructing exclusive facilities for Resource Centres, the Project will contribute to activating teacher training and information-sharing, which will lead to improved quality of education. (2) Indirect Effects 1) Enhancement of Community Participation to Education Community participation in overall primary school management activities will be enhanced through participation in this construction project and by receiving guidance on various educational matters from the government. 91 3-2 Recommendations For the effective implementation of the project, it is recommended that HMG of Nepal take the following actions: 1) Coordination with other donors As and when necessary for the effective implementation of the Project, the DOE should ensure effective coordination with the CIP donors in terms of the CIP components including the allocation of target districts.
    [Show full text]
  • VBST Short List
    1 आिेदकको दर्ा ा न륍बर नागररकर्ा न륍बर नाम थायी जि쥍ला गा.वि.स. बािुको नाम ईभेꅍट ID 10002 2632 SUMAN BHATTARAI KATHMANDU KATHMANDU M.N.P. KEDAR PRASAD BHATTARAI 136880 10003 28733 KABIN PRAJAPATI BHAKTAPUR BHAKTAPUR N.P. SITA RAM PRAJAPATI 136882 10008 271060/7240/5583 SUDESH MANANDHAR KATHMANDU KATHMANDU M.N.P. SHREE KRISHNA MANANDHAR 136890 10011 9135 SAMERRR NAKARMI KATHMANDU KATHMANDU M.N.P. BASANTA KUMAR NAKARMI 136943 10014 407/11592 NANI MAYA BASNET DOLAKHA BHIMESWOR N.P. SHREE YAGA BAHADUR BASNET136951 10015 62032/450 USHA ADHIJARI KAVRE PANCHKHAL BHOLA NATH ADHIKARI 136952 10017 411001/71853 MANASH THAPA GULMI TAMGHAS KASHER BAHADUR THAPA 136954 10018 44874 RAJ KUMAR LAMICHHANE PARBAT TILAHAR KRISHNA BAHADUR LAMICHHANE136957 10021 711034/173 KESHAB RAJ BHATTA BAJHANG BANJH JANAK LAL BHATTA 136964 10023 1581 MANDEEP SHRESTHA SIRAHA SIRAHA N.P. KUMAR MAN SHRESTHA 136969 2 आिेदकको दर्ा ा न륍बर नागररकर्ा न륍बर नाम थायी जि쥍ला गा.वि.स. बािुको नाम ईभेꅍट ID 10024 283027/3 SHREE KRISHNA GHARTI LALITPUR GODAWARI DURGA BAHADUR GHARTI 136971 10025 60-01-71-00189 CHANDRA KAMI JUMLA PATARASI JAYA LAL KAMI 136974 10026 151086/205 PRABIN YADAV DHANUSHA MARCHAIJHITAKAIYA JAYA NARAYAN YADAV 136976 10030 1012/81328 SABINA NAGARKOTI KATHMANDU DAANCHHI HARI KRISHNA NAGARKOTI 136984 10032 1039/16713 BIRENDRA PRASAD GUPTABARA KARAIYA SAMBHU SHA KANU 136988 10033 28-01-71-05846 SURESH JOSHI LALITPUR LALITPUR U.M.N.P. RAJU JOSHI 136990 10034 331071/6889 BIJAYA PRASAD YADAV BARA RAUWAHI RAM YAKWAL PRASAD YADAV 136993 10036 071024/932 DIPENDRA BHUJEL DHANKUTA TANKHUWA LOCHAN BAHADUR BHUJEL 136996 10037 28-01-067-01720 SABIN K.C.
    [Show full text]