Mineral Inclusions in Four Arkansas Diamonds: Their Nature And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mineral Inclusions in Four Arkansas Diamonds: Their Nature And AmericanMineralogist, Volume 64, pages 1059-1062, 1979 Mineral inclusionsin four Arkansas diamonds:their nature and significance NnNrBr.r.B S. PeNrareo. M. Geny NBwroN. Susnennyuoe V. GocINENI, CsnRr-ns E. MELTON Department of Chemistry, University of Georgia eNo A. A. GnnoINI Department of Geology, University of Georgia Athens,Georgia 30602 Abstract Totally-enclosed inclusions recovered from four Arkansas diamonds by burning in air at 820" C are identified by XRD and Eoex analysesas: (l) enstatite,olivine, pyrrhotite + pent- landite, (2) eclogitic garnet, (3) enstatite+ peridotitic garnet + chromite, olivine + pyrrho- tite, pyrrhotite, pentlandite,pyrite + pyrrhotite, pentlandite * a nickel sulfide,(4) diamond, enstatite,magnetite. This is the first report of nickel sulfide in diamond. A review of in- clusionsfound in Arkansasdiamonds showsa similarity with those from world-wide local- ities, and indicatesa global consistencyin diamond-formingenvironments. Introduction opaque and transparent totally-enclosedinclusions were apparentunder binocular microscopeexamina- impermeable, Since diamonds are relatively inert, tion. The 0.45 ct. stone was colorlessand of elon- pre- and hard, inclusions therein are about as well gated rounded shapewith a highly polished surface. pro- served as they could possibly be. Their study Four inclusions were detected.The 0.50 ct. crystal wherein vides entghtment about the environment was a colorlessrounded tetrahexahedronwith a diamondsformed. cleavageplane on one sideand containedtransparent A considerable literature exists on diamond in- and opaque inclusions. The 0.62 ct. diamond was Afri- clusions,but most of it dealswith diamondsof also colorlessand of rounded tetrahexahedralform. can, Siberian, and South American origin (e.9., Severalrelatively large flat opaque inclusions ("car- Meyer and Tsai, 1976;Mitchell and Giardtni,1977; bon spots") were observed.All the diamonds were Orlov, 1977).ln all, about thirty minerals have been free ofdetectable surfacecleavage cracks. identified. But for a few notable exceptions, e.8., qaartz in Brazilian diamonds, they can be classedas Experimental being derived from either eclogitic or ultramafic The diamonds were cleaned and burned by the rock. There have been,however, relatively few stud- same proceduresdescribed by Newton et al- (1977). ies on inclusions in North American diamonds.The The furnace temperature was 820"C. After com- purposeof this work was to investigatecrystalline in- bustion, residual matter from each diamond was re- clusions in four Arkansas diamonds. The diamonds coveredfrom the bottom of its platinum boat with a of 0.43, 0.45, 0.50, and 0.62 carat weight were ob- sharply-pointedwood stick moistenedwith distilled tained from Mr. Dicke Hughes,a former operator of water, transferredto a glassslide, examinedby opti- known the Arkansaskimberlite property that is now cal microscopy, then mounted on sharply-pointed as the Crater of Diamonds StatePark. The diatreme wood sticks with mucilage for XRD analysis. Sub- is located about 4 km SSE of Murfreesboro, Pike sequentto X-ray diffraction analyses,samples were County, Arkansas(Gogineni et al.,1978). recoveredand transferredto Sptr't/EDAxmounts for chemicalanalyses. The latter were conductedin con- Descriptionof the diamonds junction with co-mounted referencestandards pre- The 0.43 ct. diamond was a pale yellow rounded, viously analyzed with a MAC-400 electron beam flattened, apparently twinned hexoctahedron.Both probe. wo3 oo4x/79/09 lo-1059$o2.oo r059 1060 PANTALEO ET AL.: INCLUSIONS IN DIAM1NDS Analytical data mensions(Table l) and chemistry(Table 2) are simi- 0.43ct. diamond lar. Their end-membercomposition is almandine40, andradite 10, grossular 12, pyrope 38. They corre- Recovered inclusions are one enstatite crystal, spond to Group 3 garnet (common eclogite garnet) three olivine crystals, and one compositecrystal of according to the classificationmethod of Dawson pyrrhotite and pentlandite. The enstatitewas color_ and Stephens (1975). SEM examination revealed less and tabular-prismaticin form. Unit-cell dimen_ hillock-like irregularities on their rounded surfaces. sionsare given in Table l. The crystal was lost in at_ The latter may reflect a partial solution prior to their tempting transfer from XRD to EDAx mounts. Thus, inclusion in the diamond (Fig. l). chemical data are not available. A fourth crystal, tan to pale yellow, tabular and The three olivine crystalswere all castsof octahe_ flexible, was lost during recovery from the platinum dral form (Fig. l). Although initially colorless,all be_ boat. In appearanceit resembleda mica crystal. came orange-redas a result of the diamond burning process.All had similar unit-cell dimensions(Table 0.50ct. diamond 1) and chemistry(Fon,-Table 2). Six inclusions were recovered.The largest was a Due to the burning process,sulfide inclusionswere tricrystal composedof a colorlesstabular-prismatic convertedto oxides.Sutfrde identification is basedon the texture, chemistry, and crystal structuresof the residual oxides standardized against those derived from similar burnings of known referencesulfides. All sutflde residueswere crustaceousin texture. The residual shapeof the pyrrhotite * pentlandite resid_ uum was near-spherical,indicating a globular shape for the original sulfide. XRD analysisgave parrerns for magnetite and bunsenite.Eoax analysisihowed a composition of 95-l00%oFd., 5-OVoNi for pyrrho_ tite,and 25-50VoFe,75-5OVo Ni for pentlandite. 0.45ct. diamond Identified inclusions consist of three rounded. elongated,orange-brown crystals of iron-rich garnet, one of which is shown in Figure l. Their unit-cell di_ Table l. Single-crystal XRD data on mineral inclusions from Arkansas diamonds Inc 1us ion Source dianond Unit ce11 dinensions (A) Fe-rich garnet 0.45 carat a = 11.552(6)* Cr-lich garnet 0 50 carat a = 1I.522(L) O1ivine 0.43 carat a = 4-756(5) b = 10 r9s(8) Fig. l. (a) Octahedral cast ofFon, olivine from the 0.43 ct. dia- = c 5.965(8) mond. The inclusion is about 0.1 mm in length. (b) One of the Enstatite 0.43 carat a = 18.230(5) three almandine-rich garnets from the 0.45 ct. diamond. Its length b = 8 821(4) is about 0.06 mm. Their surfaces contained multitudes of hillock- c = 5 187(2) like irregularities. A 10,000x view of the latter on the garnet Enstatite 0 50 carat a = rB 248(2) shown is illustrated in (d). (c) 4000x view of rhe general octahe- b = 8.807(8) dral topography ofthe c = 5.I77(5) outward-facing chromite layer on the chro- mium-rich garnet from the 0.5 ct. diamond trirnineralic inclusion. (e) A restricted 20,000x view of the chromire. (f) The bimineralic inclusion composed of an octahedral cast of Foe2 olivine (left) and It Enraf-Nonium CAD-4 conputerized diffractmeter, CuKd radiatioD a crystal of pyrrhotite (attached **Bracketed nunbers are the standard deviations. homogeneous crustaceous residue of Fe and Ni oxides with a hexagonal shape on the right) from the 0.5 ct. diamond. The width of this inclusion is about 0.06 mm. PANTALEO ET AL.: INCLUSIONS IN DIAMONDS l06l crystal ofenstatite (Enn,)attached on one corner to a Four sulfide inclusions (pyrrhotite, pyrrhotite + larger central pink rounded chromian pyrope garnet, pyrite, pentlandite, a nickel sulfide + pentlandite) which in turn was cappedon a flat side oppositethe were similarly identified on the basis of residual enstatiteby a thin black layer of chromite (Fig. l). oxides relative to similarly-derived reference stan- The rounded garnet surfacealso showedan etch-like dards.The rectangularform ofthe oxide residuum of hillock texture (Fig. l). After initial single-crystal the pentlandite inclusion indicated an initial crystal XRD analysis,the enstatiteand garnet were broken form. The others showedrounded shapes,suggesting apart and re-analyzed separately.Unit-cell dimen- initial globular forms. XRD analysisof the residual sions for the enstatiteand garnet are given in Table oxide from the nickel sulfide * pentlandite inclusion l. Chemical analysesare given in Table 2. The gar- gaveonly a bunsenitepattern. Eoex analysisshowed net end-member composition is pyrope 32, knor- that the inclusion consistedof about 907onickel sul- ringite 30, uvarovite 5, khoharite 2, alrnandine31. It fide (95-1007oNi, 5-0Vo Fe) and lOVopentlandite correspondsto a Group l0 garnet of Dawson and (25VoFe,75VoNi).There is not sufficientevidence to Stephens(1975). Surfacesof the chromite layer make a mineral identification of the nickel sulfrde. showed mainly an octehedral topography (Fig. l), The pyrite showeda nickel content ranging from 5 to but dodecahedraland cubic topographieswere also l1%o. observed.EDAx analysesshowed a l:2 Fe:Cr cationic composition. 0.62ct. diamond An olivine * pyrrhotite bicrystal was about half This diamond was not completely burned. It was silicate and half sutfide (Fig. l). The olivine (Fon,, possible to eject from the remaining diamond two with a trace of Ni) has octahedralform. The hexago- small tabular colorlessinclusions that XRD analyses nal shapeofthe oxide residueofthe sulfide suggests showed to be diamond. A third small finely poly- an initial crystal form. The cationic chemistryof the crystalline inclusion, fluffy in appearance,was sub- sulfideis98Vo Fe. 27oNi. jected to powder X-ray diffraction analysis and found to contain enstatite and magnetite. "Carbon Table 2. Energy-dispersiveX-ray analysesof some mineral in- spots" observedin the diamond were apparentlycon- clusionsfrom Arkansasdiamonds sumed in the burning processand presumablywere carbon. Mineral
Recommended publications
  • Download PDF About Minerals Sorted by Mineral Name
    MINERALS SORTED BY NAME Here is an alphabetical list of minerals discussed on this site. More information on and photographs of these minerals in Kentucky is available in the book “Rocks and Minerals of Kentucky” (Anderson, 1994). APATITE Crystal system: hexagonal. Fracture: conchoidal. Color: red, brown, white. Hardness: 5.0. Luster: opaque or semitransparent. Specific gravity: 3.1. Apatite, also called cellophane, occurs in peridotites in eastern and western Kentucky. A microcrystalline variety of collophane found in northern Woodford County is dark reddish brown, porous, and occurs in phosphatic beds, lenses, and nodules in the Tanglewood Member of the Lexington Limestone. Some fossils in the Tanglewood Member are coated with phosphate. Beds are generally very thin, but occasionally several feet thick. The Woodford County phosphate beds were mined during the early 1900s near Wallace, Ky. BARITE Crystal system: orthorhombic. Cleavage: often in groups of platy or tabular crystals. Color: usually white, but may be light shades of blue, brown, yellow, or red. Hardness: 3.0 to 3.5. Streak: white. Luster: vitreous to pearly. Specific gravity: 4.5. Tenacity: brittle. Uses: in heavy muds in oil-well drilling, to increase brilliance in the glass-making industry, as filler for paper, cosmetics, textiles, linoleum, rubber goods, paints. Barite generally occurs in a white massive variety (often appearing earthy when weathered), although some clear to bluish, bladed barite crystals have been observed in several vein deposits in central Kentucky, and commonly occurs as a solid solution series with celestite where barium and strontium can substitute for each other. Various nodular zones have been observed in Silurian–Devonian rocks in east-central Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences in Montana
    Report of Investigation 23 Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences in Montana Richard B. Berg 2015 Cover photo by Richard Berg. Sapphires (very pale green and colorless) concentrated by panning. The small red grains are garnets, commonly found with sapphires in western Montana, and the black sand is mainly magnetite. Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences, RI 23 Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences in Montana Richard B. Berg Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology MBMG Report of Investigation 23 2015 i Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences, RI 23 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................................1 Descriptions of Occurrences ..................................................................................................7 Selected Bibliography of Articles on Montana Sapphires ................................................... 75 General Montana ............................................................................................................75 Yogo ................................................................................................................................ 75 Southwestern Montana Alluvial Deposits........................................................................ 76 Specifi cally Rock Creek sapphire district ........................................................................ 76 Specifi cally Dry Cottonwood Creek deposit and the Butte area ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Collecting Sites in North Carolina by W
    .'.' .., Mineral Collecting Sites in North Carolina By W. F. Wilson and B. J. McKenzie RUTILE GUMMITE IN GARNET RUBY CORUNDUM GOLD TORBERNITE GARNET IN MICA ANATASE RUTILE AJTUNITE AND TORBERNITE THULITE AND PYRITE MONAZITE EMERALD CUPRITE SMOKY QUARTZ ZIRCON TORBERNITE ~/ UBRAR'l USE ONLV ,~O NOT REMOVE. fROM LIBRARY N. C. GEOLOGICAL SUHVEY Information Circular 24 Mineral Collecting Sites in North Carolina By W. F. Wilson and B. J. McKenzie Raleigh 1978 Second Printing 1980. Additional copies of this publication may be obtained from: North CarOlina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development Geological Survey Section P. O. Box 27687 ~ Raleigh. N. C. 27611 1823 --~- GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SECTION The Geological Survey Section shall, by law"...make such exami­ nation, survey, and mapping of the geology, mineralogy, and topo­ graphy of the state, including their industrial and economic utilization as it may consider necessary." In carrying out its duties under this law, the section promotes the wise conservation and use of mineral resources by industry, commerce, agriculture, and other governmental agencies for the general welfare of the citizens of North Carolina. The Section conducts a number of basic and applied research projects in environmental resource planning, mineral resource explora­ tion, mineral statistics, and systematic geologic mapping. Services constitute a major portion ofthe Sections's activities and include identi­ fying rock and mineral samples submitted by the citizens of the state and providing consulting services and specially prepared reports to other agencies that require geological information. The Geological Survey Section publishes results of research in a series of Bulletins, Economic Papers, Information Circulars, Educa­ tional Series, Geologic Maps, and Special Publications.
    [Show full text]
  • A PROPOSED NEW CLASSIFICATION for GEM-QUALITY GARNETS by Carol M
    A PROPOSED NEW CLASSIFICATION FOR GEM-QUALITY GARNETS By Carol M. Stockton and D. Vincent Manson Existing methods of classifying garnets ver the past two decades, the discovery of new types have proved to be inadequate to deal with 0 of garnets in East Africa has led to a realization that some new types of garnets discovered garnet classification systems based on the early work of recently. A new classification system based gemologists such as B. W. Anderson are no longer entirely on the chemical analysis of more than 500 satisfactory. This article proposes a new system of classifi- gem garnets is proposed for use in gemology. cation, derived from chemical data on a large collection of Chemical, optical, and physical data for a transparent gem-quality garnets, that requires only representative collection of 202 transparent gemquality stones are summarized. Eight determination of refractive index, color, and spectral fea- garnet species arc defined-gross~~lar, tures to classify a given garnet. Thus, the jeweler- andradite, pyrope, pyrope-almandine, gemologist familiar with standard gem-testing techniques almandine~almandine-spessartine, can readily and correctly characterize virtually any garnet spessartine, and pyrope-spessartine-and he or she may encounter, and place it within one of eight methods of identification are described. rigorously defined gem species: grossular, andradite, Properties that can be determined with pyrope, pyrope-almandine, almandine, almandine-spes- standard gem-testing equipment sartine, spessartine, and pyrope-spessartine. Several varie- (specifically, refractive index, color, and tal categories (e.g., tsavorite, chrome pyrope, rhodolite, absorption spectrum) can be used to and malaia*) are also defined.
    [Show full text]
  • Minerals Found in Michigan Listed by County
    Michigan Minerals Listed by Mineral Name Based on MI DEQ GSD Bulletin 6 “Mineralogy of Michigan” Actinolite, Dickinson, Gogebic, Gratiot, and Anthonyite, Houghton County Marquette counties Anthophyllite, Dickinson, and Marquette counties Aegirinaugite, Marquette County Antigorite, Dickinson, and Marquette counties Aegirine, Marquette County Apatite, Baraga, Dickinson, Houghton, Iron, Albite, Dickinson, Gratiot, Houghton, Keweenaw, Kalkaska, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Monroe and Marquette counties counties Algodonite, Baraga, Houghton, Keweenaw, and Aphrosiderite, Gogebic, Iron, and Marquette Ontonagon counties counties Allanite, Gogebic, Iron, and Marquette counties Apophyllite, Houghton, and Keweenaw counties Almandite, Dickinson, Keweenaw, and Marquette Aragonite, Gogebic, Iron, Jackson, Marquette, and counties Monroe counties Alunite, Iron County Arsenopyrite, Marquette, and Menominee counties Analcite, Houghton, Keweenaw, and Ontonagon counties Atacamite, Houghton, Keweenaw, and Ontonagon counties Anatase, Gratiot, Houghton, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Ontonagon counties Augite, Dickinson, Genesee, Gratiot, Houghton, Iron, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Ontonagon counties Andalusite, Iron, and Marquette counties Awarurite, Marquette County Andesine, Keweenaw County Axinite, Gogebic, and Marquette counties Andradite, Dickinson County Azurite, Dickinson, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Anglesite, Marquette County Ontonagon counties Anhydrite, Bay, Berrien, Gratiot, Houghton, Babingtonite, Keweenaw County Isabella, Kalamazoo, Kent, Keweenaw, Macomb, Manistee,
    [Show full text]
  • And Almandine-Rich Garnets to 11 Gpa by Brillouin Scattering
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 109, B10210, doi:10.1029/2004JB003081, 2004 Single-crystal elasticity of grossular- and almandine-rich garnets to 11 GPa by Brillouin scattering Fuming Jiang, Sergio Speziale, and Thomas S. Duffy Department of Geosciences, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA Received 11 March 2004; revised 23 June 2004; accepted 2 August 2004; published 28 October 2004. [1] The high-pressure elasticity of grossular-rich Grs87And9Pyp2Alm2 and almandine- rich Alm72Pyp20Sps3Grs3And2 natural garnet single crystals were determined by Brillouin scattering to 11 GPa in a diamond anvil cell. The experiments were carried out using a 16:3:1 methanol-ethanol water mixture as pressure medium. The aggregate moduli as well as their pressure derivatives were obtained by fitting the data to Eulerian finite strain equations. The inversion yields KS0 = 165.0 ± 0.9 GPa, G0 = 104.2 ± 0.3 GPa, (@KS/@P)T0 = 3.8 ± 0.2, and (@G/@P)0 = 1.1 ± 0.1 for the grossular-rich composition and KS0 = 174.9 ± 1.6 GPa, G0 = 95.6 ± 0.5 GPa, (@KS/@P)T0 = 4.7 ± 0.3, and (@G/@P)0 = 1.4 ± 0.1 for the almandine-rich garnet. Both individual and aggregate elastic moduli of the two garnets define nearly linear modulus pressure trends. The elastic anisotropy of the garnets increases weakly in magnitude with compression. Isothermal compression curves derived from our results are generally consistent with static compression data under hydrostatic conditions, and the effects of nonhydrostaticity on previous diffraction data can be identified. The pressure derivatives obtained here are generally lower than those reported in high-pressure polycrystalline ultrasonic elasticity studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Victorian Almandine Garnet Pendant, PT-3044 Pearls Dance Around An
    Victorian Almandine Garnet Pendant, PT-3044 Pearls dance around an oval cabochon cut almondine garnet in this vintage pendant with tassels. 15k yellow gold tassels drip from this vintage jewelry piece like a shimmering comet shooting through the sky. Lending to this celestial theme is an oval cabochon almandine garnet that is topped with a diamond-studded star. The seven rose and old mine cut diamonds that accent the star total 0.11 carats. Twenty-seven spherical natural half pearls gleam around the Victorian garnet like a crescent moon. This vintage pendant is circa 1870 Item # pt3044 Metal 15k yellow gold Circa 1870 Weight in grams 12.93 Period or Style Victorian Special characteristics This hand wrought Victorian pendant features rose and mine cut diamonds which are bead set in a star shaped plate applied atop the garnet. The bail is set with 3 pearls. Thirteen tassels hang from the base. At one time a locket of hair was held in place on the back. Condition Very Good Diamond cut or shape rose Diamond carat weight 0.03 Diamond mm measurements 1.4 Diamond color G to H Diamond clarity VS2 to I1 Diamond # of stones 6 Diamond2 cut or shape old mine cut Diamond2 carat weight 0.08 Diamond2 mm measurements 2.7 Diamond2 color I Diamond2 clarity SI1 Diamond2 # of stones 1 Gemstone name Almandite Garnet Gemstone cut or shape oval cabachon Gemstone mm measurements 20.3 x 14.9 Gemstone type Type II Gemstone clarity SI2 Gemstone hue very slightly orange red Gemstone tone 6-Medium Dark Gemstone saturation 5-Strong Gemstone # of stones 1 Gemstone other
    [Show full text]
  • A Tale of Two Garnets: the Role of Solid Solution in the Development Toward a Modern Mineralogyk
    American Mineralogist, Volume 101, pages 1735–1749, 2016 A tale of two garnets: The role of solid solution in the development toward a modern mineralogyk Charles A. Geiger1,* 1Department of Chemistry and Physics of Materials, Salzburg University, Hellbrunnerstrasse 34, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria Abstract This article reviews the development of mineralogy as a science by focusing largely on the common silicate garnets of general formula {X3}[Y2](Si3)O12. It tells of important discoveries, analyses, and propos- als by various scientists relating to crystallography, crystal structures, isomorphism, and solid solution starting in Europe in the late 1700s. The critical recognition of the importance of ionic size of atoms in determining crystal-chemical properties and solid-solution behavior is emphasized. The two garnet species “pyralspite” and “(u)grandite,” which were considered to represent two independent solid-solution series, were introduced by N.H. Winchell and A.N. Winchell (1927) in their well-known book Elements of Optical Mineralogy. Critical comments on the assumptions behind the classification scheme have been pointed out for at least 50 yr, but it remains in use. There is more, though, behind this garnet classification scheme than just simple terminology. There are a long series of scientific dis- coveries and advances that are largely forgotten by the broader mineralogical community. They begin, here, with the work of the “father of crystallography,” René-Just Haüy, concerning the microscopic nature of crystals around 1780 and include later discoveries and proposals by Mitscherlich, Beudant, Wollaston, and Kopp relating to isomorphism and solid-solution behavior all before 1850. A second key era started with the discovery of X‑ray diffraction in 1912 that allowed the atomic structures of crystals and, furthermore, atomic and ion radii to be determined.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jurassic Tourmaline–Garnet–Beryl Semi-Gemstone Province in The
    International Geology Review ISSN: 0020-6814 (Print) 1938-2839 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tigr20 The Jurassic tourmaline–garnet–beryl semi- gemstone province in the Sanandaj–Sirjan Zone, western Iran Fatemeh Nouri, Robert J. Stern & Hossein Azizi To cite this article: Fatemeh Nouri, Robert J. Stern & Hossein Azizi (2018): The Jurassic tourmaline–garnet–beryl semi-gemstone province in the Sanandaj–Sirjan Zone, western Iran, International Geology Review To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2018.1539927 Published online: 01 Nov 2018. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 95 View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tigr20 INTERNATIONAL GEOLOGY REVIEW https://doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2018.1539927 ARTICLE The Jurassic tourmaline–garnet–beryl semi-gemstone province in the Sanandaj– Sirjan Zone, western Iran Fatemeh Nouria, Robert J. Sternb and Hossein Azizi c aGeology Department, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran; bGeosciences Department, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA; cDepartment of Mining, Faculty of Engineering, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Deposits of semi-gemstones tourmaline, beryl, and garnet associated with Jurassic granites are Received 5 August 2018 found in the northern Sanandaj–Sirjan Zone (SaSZ) of western Iran, defining a belt that can be Accepted 20 October 2018 traced for
    [Show full text]
  • Gems and Placers—A Genetic Relationship Par Excellence
    Article Gems and Placers—A Genetic Relationship Par Excellence Dill Harald G. Mineralogical Department, Gottfried-Wilhelm-Leibniz University, Welfengarten 1, D-30167 Hannover, Germany; [email protected] Received: 30 August 2018; Accepted: 15 October 2018; Published: 19 October 2018 Abstract: Gemstones form in metamorphic, magmatic, and sedimentary rocks. In sedimentary units, these minerals were emplaced by organic and inorganic chemical processes and also found in clastic deposits as a result of weathering, erosion, transport, and deposition leading to what is called the formation of placer deposits. Of the approximately 150 gemstones, roughly 40 can be recovered from placer deposits for a profit after having passed through the “natural processing plant” encompassing the aforementioned stages in an aquatic and aeolian regime. It is mainly the group of heavy minerals that plays the major part among the placer-type gemstones (almandine, apatite, (chrome) diopside, (chrome) tourmaline, chrysoberyl, demantoid, diamond, enstatite, hessonite, hiddenite, kornerupine, kunzite, kyanite, peridote, pyrope, rhodolite, spessartine, (chrome) titanite, spinel, ruby, sapphire, padparaja, tanzanite, zoisite, topaz, tsavorite, and zircon). Silica and beryl, both light minerals by definition (minerals with a density less than 2.8–2.9 g/cm3, minerals with a density greater than this are called heavy minerals, also sometimes abbreviated to “heavies”. This technical term has no connotation as to the presence or absence of heavy metals), can also appear in some placers and won for a profit (agate, amethyst, citrine, emerald, quartz, rose quartz, smoky quartz, morganite, and aquamarine, beryl). This is also true for the fossilized tree resin, which has a density similar to the light minerals.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PRECAMBRIAN ROCKS of TASMANIA, PART VII NOTES on the PETROLOGY of SOME ROCKS from the PORT DAVEY-BATHURST HARBOUR AREA by A
    PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF TASMANIA, VOLUME 99. THE PRECAMBRIAN ROCKS OF TASMANIA, PART VII NOTES ON THE PETROLOGY OF SOME ROCKS FROM THE PORT DAVEY-BATHURST HARBOUR AREA By A. SPRY' and W. E. BAKER' (With two plates and two text figurea.) ABSTRACT No formal stratigraphic terms will be used in Petrological examination SUggests ,that the rocks this paper and it seems that, until formal strati­ of the Port Davey-Bathurst HaDbour area may be graphic terms can be useti in an ,accurate, under­ divided into .two main groups: the regionally meta­ standable manner, the stratigraphic names for this morphosed schists, quartzites, phyllites and amphi­ area may have to be abandoned. bolites which are probably older Precambrian, and the essentially unmetamorphosed sediments which PRINCIPLES are probably younger Precambrian. The latter can be divided into three main types; subgreywacke The rocks are divided into a number of litho­ sandstones and slates (Ua. Bay, Bramble Cove and logical assemblages using the amount of meta­ north eastern Bathurst Harbour), greywacke sand­ morphism and deformation as criteria following stones, slates and conglomerates (Joe Page Bay) Spry (1962a) because the structural and strati­ and orthoconglomerates and quartzites (Mts. graphic relations are not yet clear from field Rugby, Berry, &c.). studies. The low ,to medium-grade metamorphics strongly resemble rocks at Frenchmans Cap, the upper Mersey-Forbh area and Ulverstone, and INTRODUCTION are assigned to the Older Precambrian (Spry The geology of the remote south-western corner 1962a) , Moderately deformed but unmeta­ of Tasmania is complex 'and observations by morphosed sediments resemble rocks between Twelvetrees (1906, 1908, 1909), Baker (957), Zeehan and Corinna and along the North-West Stefanski (1957), and Taylor (1959) have left Coast (Spry 1957a, 1964) and may be Younger major problems of structure and stratigraphy un­ Precambrian.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetite Exsolution in Almandine Garnet
    MINERALOGICAL MAGAZINE, DECEMBER 1986, VOL. 50, PP. 621-33 Magnetite exsolution in almandine garnet A. J. BREARLEY AND P. E. CHAMPNESS Department of Geology, The University, Manchester, M13 9PL A B S T R A C T. Three almandine-rich metamorphic garnets metamorphic histories. Sample localities and have been studied by analytical electron microscopy petrography are presented below. and electron microprobe analysis. Electron microprobe Sample RM5020 is a pelitic gneiss from the analyses with total Fe calculated as Fe2 + show that there Moine inlier on the Ross of Mull, Isle of Mull, are no significant departures from stoichiometry due to the presence of Fe 3§ in any of the garnets studied. Scotland and has been studied in detail by Brearley However, in the transmission electron microscope (TEM) (1984). The rock contains the assemblage garnet + all the garnets were found to contain myriad spherical, biotite + muscovite + plagioclase + quartz. Garnet iron-rich particles up to 400/~ in diameter. Microdiffrac- is abundant, occurring as small crystals less than tion techniques have revealed that the particles are a cubic 500/~m in diameter. The core regions are optically spinel phase, consistent with magnetite. There is no homogeneous (fig. la) and are separated from the crystallographic relationship between the host garnet and outer inclusion-free rim of the garnet by a zone full the particles, a rare situation for exsolution processes. The of inclusions, dominantly quartz with subordinate presence of such particles is interpreted in terms of the opaques. These distinct zones are probably exsolution of magnetite from almandine garnet during cooling. This can apparently occur at temperatures below attributable to periods of growth at different rates 550 ~ The size of the particles is a qualitative indicator of during the metamorphic evolution of the area.
    [Show full text]